Hakin Dabobi

Hakkokin dabba ita ce falsafar da da yawa ko dukkan dabbobin da suke da kyawawan dabi’u ba tare da amfaninsu ga mutane ba, kuma cewa mafi yawan maslaharsu—kamar guje wa wahala—ya kamata a ba su la’akari da irin maslahar ‘yan Adam.Grazia (2002), ch. 2; Taylor (2009), ch Ana yawan amfani da hujja daga shari'o'in gefe don cimma wannan ƙarshe. Wannan gardamar ta yi nuni da cewa, idan aka ba wa ’yan Adam matsayi irin su jarirai, manya, da The SAGE Encyclopedia of Terrorism, Second Edition banakasassu masu hankali, to, dole ne a ba wa dabbobin da ba na mutum ba irin wannan la’akarin dabi’a, tun da dabbobi ba su da wata sananniyar dabi’ar da ta dace da mutum.That a central goal of animal rights is to eliminate the property status of animals, see Sunstein (2004), p. 11ff.
For speciesism and undamental protections, see Waldau (2011).coupled with disdain or irony: Pluhar, Evelyn B. (1995). "Human "superiority" and the argument from marginal cases". Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Book collections on Project MUSE. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 9. ISBN 9780822316480. Retrieved 16 April 2021. For example, in an editorial entitled 'Animal Rights Nonsense,' ... in the prestigious science journal Nature, defenders of animal rights are accused of being committed to the absurdity of 'bacteria rights.'
For food, clothing, research subjects or enterainment, see Francione (1995), p. 17.f>Singer (2000), pp. 151–156
Horta (2010) Horta (2010)
A faɗin magana, musamman a cikin shahararrun jawabai, ana amfani da kalmar "haƙƙin dabba" sau da yawa tare da "kariyar dabba" ko "'yantar dabbobi". A taƙaice, "haƙƙin dabba" yana nufin ra'ayin cewa dabbobi da yawa suna da haƙƙin haƙƙin da za a mutunta su a matsayin daidaikun mutane - haƙƙoƙin rayuwa, 'yanci, da 'yanci daga azabtarwa - waɗanda ƙila ba za a shafe su ta hanyar la'akari da jimillar jin daɗi baTaylor (2009), ch.  Cohen, Carl; Regan, Tom (2001). The Animal Rights Debate. Point/Counterpoint: Philosophers Debate Contemporary Issues Series. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 47. ISBN 9780847696628. Retrieved 16 April 2021. Too often overlooked in the animal world, according to Sapontzis, are insects that have interests, and therefore rights.
"Animal Law Courses". Animal Legal Defense Fund. Archived from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
Yawancin masu fafutukar kare haƙƙin dabba suna adawa da sanya darajar ɗabi'a da kariya ta asali bisa tushen kasancewar nau'in jinsin kaɗai.Compare for example similar usage of the term in 1938: The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 53. National Association of Biology Teachers. 1938. p. 211. Retrieved 16 April 2021. The foundation from which these behaviors spring is the ideology known as speciesism. Speciesism is deeply rooted in the widely-held belief that the human species is entitled to certain rights and privileges. Also see Sunstein, Cass R. (February 20, 2000). "The Chimps' Day in Court" Archived 2017-05-01 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times Scruton, Roger (Summer 2000). "Animal Rights". City Journal. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2005- Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12. (2005), pp. 11, 16.
Also see Frey (1980); and for a review of Frey, see Sprigge (1981) 

Tarihi
Babban labarin: Tarihin haƙƙin dabba
Tattaunawa mai mahimmanci game da haƙƙin dabba ya fara ne a cikin karni na 18 da 19 na Turai, amma ana iya samun mutunta dabbobi a yawancin al'adu da al'adu, ciki har da Hindu, Buddha, Jainism, da wasu al'adun Afirka da na asali."Animal Rights." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007 A cikin yammacin duniya, Aristotle yana kallon dabbobi a matsayin rashin dalili"Animal Rights." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. Tähtinen, Unto (1976). Ahimsa. Non-Violence in Indian Tradition. London. pp. 2–3 (English translation</ ] kuma akwai don amfanin ɗan adam, kodayake sauran tsoffin masana falsafa sun yi imanin dabbobi sun cancanci kulawa mai laushi. Yayin da malamai kamar Descartes suka ga dabbobi a matsayin automata suma, Grant, Catharine (2006). The No-nonsense Guide to Animal Rights. New Internationalist. p. 24. ISBN 9781904456407. These religions emphasize ahimsa, which is the principle of non-violence towards all living things. The first precept is a prohibition against the killing of any creature. The Jain, Hindu and Buddhist injunctions against killing serve to teach that all creatures are spiritually equal.  Animal rights". BBC. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2019. The main reason for Hindu respect for animal rights is the principle of ahimsa. According to the principle of ahimsa, no living thing should be harmed. This applies to humans and animals. The Jains' belief system takes the principle of ahimsa regarding animals so seriously that as well as being strict vegetarians, some followers wear masks to prevent them breathing in insects. They may also sweep paths with a small broom to make sure they do not tread on any living creatures. Owen, Marna A. (2009). Animal Rights: Noble Cause Or Needless Effort?. Twenty-First Century Books. p. 12. ISBN 9780761340829. da Kant sun ƙaryata game da ayyukan kai tsaye ga dabbobi, "Animal Consciousness, No. 2. Historical background". Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. 23 December 1995. Archived from the original on 6 September 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2014. Jeremy Bentham ya jaddada ikon su na shan wahala. yuwuwar wahalar dabbobi.Workman, L. (2013). Charles Darwin: The Shaping of Evolutionary Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-137-31323-2. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019. 177  Motsin anti-vivisection ya bullo akarshen karni na 19 da farkon karni na 20,[3"Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" da mata suka koraRoss, Karen (2014). "Winning Women's Votes: Defending Animal Experimentation and Women's Clubs in New York, 1920–1930". New York History. 95 (1): 26–40. doi:10.1353/nyh.2014.0050 Daga 1970s gaba, haɓaka masana da masu fafutukar sha'awar kula da dabbobi sun yi niyya don wayar da kan jama'a da sake fasalin dokokin don inganta haƙƙnsinRights (Lanham: University Press of America, 2010), p. 16 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 88 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 99 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
in dabba da dangantakar ɗan adam da dabbha.
Singer (2000), pp. 151–156
Martin, Gus (15 June 2011). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Terrorism, Second Edition. SAGE. ISBN 9781412980166 – via Google Books Kant, Immanuel (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence
Spencer, J., "'Love and Hatred are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation': Animal Feeling in the Century before Darwin," in A. Richardson, ed., After Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and the Mind (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2013), p. 37 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine

A  addini
Duba kuma: Dabbobi a Musulunci; Kiristanci da hakkin dabba; da Haƙƙin Dabbobi a Jainism, Hindu, da BuddhaPs 147
Ga wasu tushen haƙƙin dabba yana cikin addini ko bautar dabba (ko kuma gabaɗaya ibada), tare da wasu addinai sun hana kashe kowace dabba. A wasu addinan ana ɗaukar dabbobi marasa tsabta. Ƙungiyoyin Hindu da Buddha sun watsar da hadayar dabba kuma sun rungumi cin ganyayyaki daga karni na 3 KZ.Garner (2005), pp. 21– Ɗaya daga cikin muhimman takunkumi na bangaskiyar Jain, Hindu, da Buddhist shine ra'ayin ahimsa, ko ƙin lalata rayuwa. A cewar addinin Buddah, mutane ba su cancanci fifita fifiko fiye da sauran halittu ba.Grant, Catharine (2006). The No-nonsense Guide to Animal Rights. New Internationalist. p. 24. ISBN 9781904456407. These religions emphasize ahimsa, which is the principle of non-violence towards all living things. The first precept is a prohibition against the killing of any creature. The Jain, Hindu and Buddhist injunctions against killing serve to teach that all creatures are spiritually equal., Tafsirin Dharmic na wannan akida ya haramta kashe duk wani mai raiGrant, Catharine (2006). The No-nonsense Guide to Animal Rights. New Internationalist. p. 24. ISBN 9781904456407. These religions emphasize ahimsa, which is the principle of non-violence towards all living things. The first precept is a prohibition against the killing of any creature. The Jain, Hindu and Buddhist injunctions against killing serve to teach that all creatures are spiritually equal. Meenakshi Sundaram, T. P. (1957). "Vegetarianism in Tamil Literature". 15th World Vegetarian Congress 1957. International Vegetarian Union (IVU). Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022. Ahimsa is the ruling principle of Indian life from the very earliest times. ... This positive spiritual attitude is easily explained to the common man in a negative way as "ahimsa" and hence this way of denoting it. Tiruvalluvar speaks of this as "kollaamai" or "non-killing."
Craig (1988)
A Musulunci, Sharia ta amince da hakkin dabbobi da wuri. Wannan sanin ya dogara ne akan Alqur'ani da Hadisi. Alkur'ani ya kunshi bayanai da yawa game da dabbobi, inda ya yi bayani dalla-dalla cewa suna da rayuka, suna kafa al'umma, sadarwa da Allah, kuma suna bauta masa ta hanyarsu. Muhammadu ya hana mabiyansa cutar da kowace dabba kuma ya umarce su da su mutunta hakkin dabbobi"BBC - Religions - Islam: Animals". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2020-02-04. Retrieved 2019-12-20.Duk da haka, Musulunci ya yarda da cin wasu nau'in dabbobi.Weir (2009): see Clark (1977); Rollin (1981); Midgley (1984).
Rowlands (2009), p. 98ff; Hursthouse (2000a); Hursthouse (2000b), p. 146ff.
 30:24 and NW; Psalm 104:24, 25, 27 ] Ya ci gaba da cewa Allah “ya ba dabbobi abinci, kuma ya sa hankaka kuka.”Nussbaum (2006), pp. 388ff, 393ff; also see Nussbaum (2004), p. 299ff. Vallentyne (2005) Archived 2016-04-13 at the Wayback Machine; Vallentyne (2007).
Rowlands (1998), p. 118ff, particularly pp. 147–152.

Amfani
Ƙarin bayani: Daidaita la'akari da sha'awa da Utilitarianism
Nussbaum (2004) ya rubuta cewa amfani da amfani, wanda ya fara da Jeremy Bentham da John Stuart Mill, ya ba da gudummawa sosai wajen fahimtar halin ɗabi'a na dabbobi fiye da kowane ka'idar ɗabi'a.Nussbaum (2004), p.  Masanin falsafa mai amfani wanda ya fi alaƙa da haƙƙin dabba shine Peter Singer, farfesa a fannin ilimin halittu a Jami'ar Princeton. Mawaƙa ba mai ɗorewa ba ne, amma yana amfani da yaren haƙƙi don ya kamata mu bi da mutane ta hanyar da ya faru da abubuwan da abin ya shafa.For a discussion of preference utilitarianism, see Singer (2011), pp. 14ff, 94ff. Singer (1990), p  (1989), pp. xii, pp. 117–118; Rollin (2007) Archived 2020-07-28 at the Wayback Machine

Singer (1990), pp. Singer (1990), pp. Mawaƙi ya ɗauko wani masanin falsafa ɗan Ingila Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900): "Kyakkyawan kowane mutum ɗaya ba shi da wani mahimmanci, ta mahangar ... na sararin samaniya, fiye da alherin wani."Singer 1990, p

Peter Singer
Abubuwan sha'awa an ƙaddara akan ikon wahala.
Singer yayi jayayya cewa daidaiton la'akari shine takardar sayan magani, ba tabbatar da gaskiya ba: idan daidaiton jinsi ya dogara ne kawai akan ra'ayin cewa maza da mata suna da hankali daidai, dole ne mu watsar da aikin yin la'akari daidai idan an gano wannan a matsayin ƙarya. Amma ra'ayin daidaito na ɗabi'a ba ya dogara da al'amura na zahiri kamar r.Singer (1990), pp. 10–17, citing Stamp Dawkins (1980), Walker (1983), and Griffin  (1984); Garner (2005), pp. 13–14. Singer (1990) p. 12ff Francione (1995), pp. 4
Wayback Machine
sha'awar jin daɗi; ikon fara aiki don biyan sha'awarsu da manufofinsu; wani psychophysical ainihi a kan lokaci; da kuma jindadin mutum ta ma'anar cewa rayuwarsu ta yi kyau ko rashin lafiya a gare su, a hankali ba tare da amfaninsu ga wasu ba, kuma ba tare da kasancewarsu abin dogaron wani baRegan (1983), p. 243l
Regan (1983), p. 243
Ganin cewa Singer ya fi damuwa da inganta kula da dabbobi kuma ya yarda cewa, a wasu yanayi na hasashe, ana iya amfani da dabbobin ɗaya bisa doka don ci gaba da ƙarewar ɗan adam ko na ɗan adam, Regan ya yi imanin ya kamata mu bi da dabbobin da ba na ɗan adam ba kamar yadda za mu yi da mutane. Ya yi amfani da ƙaƙƙarfan ƙa'idar Kantian (wanda Kant da kansa ya yi amfani da shi ga mutane kawai) cewa bai kamata a yi hadaya da su a matsayin wata hanya ta ƙarshe ba, kuma dole ne a bi da su azaman ƙarewa.Regan (1983).
Francione (1990), pp. 4, 17ff.
Rowlands (1998), p. 118ff, particularly pp. 147–152.

wariyar mata da hakkin dabba
Ƙarin bayani: Ƙwararrun Mata da Dabbobi, Da'a na Kulawa, da Ƙa'idodin Mata
Singer (1990)
Masanin tattalin arzikin Amurka Carol Adams ya yi rubuce-rubuce da yawa game da alakar mata da yancin dabba, ta fara da Siyasar Jima'i na Nama (1990).Gruen (1993), p. 60ff Green, Elizabeth W. (10 October 2003). "Fifteen Questions For Carol J. Adams". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 22 November 2008. George Dvorsky. "The Ethics of Animal Enhancement". Archived from the original on 2017-04-25. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Mata sun taka muhimmiyar rawa wajen bayar da shawarwarin dabbobi tun daga karni na 19.Lansbury (1985); Adams (1990); Donovan (1993); Gruen (1993); Adams (1994); Adams and Donovan (1995); Adams (2004); MacKinnon (2004). ] Ƙungiyar anti-vivisection a cikin 19th da farkon 20th karni a Ingila da Amurka mata ne ke tafiyar da su, ciki har da Frances Power Cobbe, Anna Kingsford, Lizzy Lind af Hageby daKean (1995) Archived 2020-04-13 at the Wayback Machine. Caroline Earle White (1833-1916).Kean (1995) Archived 2020-04-13 at the Wayback Machine. bGarner ya rubuta cewa kashi 70 cikin 100 na membobin kungiyar Victoria Stnsnreet Society (ɗaya daga cikin ƙungiyoyin anti-vivisection da Cobbe ya kafa).Garner (2005), p. 141, citing Elston (1990), p.

Ƙungiyar da'awar dabba ta zamani tana da irin wannan wakilcin mata. Ba koyaushe suke cikin matsayi na jagoranci ba: a lokacin Maris don Dabbobi a Washington, D.C., a cikin 1990 - zanga-zangar 'yancin dabba mafi girma da aka gudanar har zuwa lokacin a Amurka - yawancin mahalarta mata ne, amma yawancin masu magana da dandamali maza ne.,Garner (2005), pp. 142–143,  Duk da haka, ƙungiyoyin bayar da shawarwarin dabbobi da yawa sun kafa ta ta hanyar mata, ciki har da British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection ta Cobbe a London a 1898; Hukumar Kula da Dabbobi ta Indiya ta Rukmini Devi Arundale a cikin 1962; da Jama'a don Kula da Da'a na Dabbobi, wanda Ingrid Newkirk ya kafa tare a cikin 1980. Giménez, Emiliano (January 4, 2015). "Argentine orangutan granted unprecedented legal rights". CNN. CNN Espanol. Archived from the original on April 3, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2015.

Gabatarwar mata a cikin motsi ya haifar da ɗimbin wallafe-wallafen ilimi da ke binciko yancin mata da na dabba, [Lansbury (1985); Adams (1990); Donovan (1993); Gruen (1993); Adams (1994); Adams and Donovan (1995); Adams (2004); MacKinnon (2004 Lansbury (1985); Adams (1990); Donovan (1993); Gruen (1993); Adams (1994); Adams and Donovan (1995); Adams (2004); MacKinnon (2004

Hakkokin dabbobi da akidu masu nisa
Hoton Baƙar fata da fari na Savitri Di sanye cikin kayan Indiya, kusan 1937 Regan: The Case For Animal Rights". The Vegetarian Site. Archived from the original on November 2, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
Savitri Devi ya kasance mai goyon bayan haƙƙin dabba kuma mai goyon bayan haɗuwa tsakanin Hindu da Nazism. Ta kasance mai tasiri a cikin da'irar Eco-Fascist a yau.
Yawancin mambobin jam'iyyar Nazi ta Jamus sun kasance masu goyon bayan cin ganyayyaki da 'yancin dabbobi. Adolf Hitler ya dauki kansa a matsayin mai cin ganyayyaki, kuma bisa ga kwafin dah daga cikin Tattaunawar Tebura na Hitler, ya ce "duniya ta gaba za ta zama mai cin ganyayyaki." Hitler, Adolf; Cameron, Norman; Trevor-Roper, Hugh R. (2000). Hitler's table talk, 1941-44: his private conversations (3rd ed.). New York City: Enigma Books. ISBN 978-1-929631-05-6. kamar kanta, wadda "ta firgita matuka game da halin mutum ga dabbobi ... don samun tausayi ga mutanen da ke shan wahala saboda kasancewarsu Yahudawa.".Best 2014
"Posthuman Rights: Dimensions  Transhuman Worlds", A yau ana samun ci gaba da yunƙuri na ƙwararrun ƴancin ra'ayi wanda masu sharhi na baya-bayan nan suka yi tasiri wanda ya haɗa haƙƙin dabba a cikin akidarsaManavis, Sarah (2018-09-21). "Eco-fascism: The ideology marrying environmentalism and white supremacy thriving online". New Statesman. Retrieved 2025-06-09. na wani aiki-saboda cewa dabbobi ba su da wani sha'awa. Frey yayi jayayya cewa bukatu sun dogara ne akan sha'awa, kuma babu wani sha'awar da zai iya kasancewa ba tare da imani daidai ba. Dabbobi ba su da imani, saboda yanayin imani yana buƙatar ikon yin imani na biyu - imani game da imani - wanda yake jayayya yana buƙatar harshe: "Idan wani ya ce, misali 'Cat ya yi imanin cewa an kulle ƙofar,' to, mutumin yana riƙe, kamar yadda na gani, cewa cat yana riƙe da sanarwa Frey (1989) .Nibert 2013 "Savitri Devi: The mystical fascist being resurrected by the alt-right". 2017-10-28. Retrieved 2025-06-09. ,pg. 94-100 Archived 2011-11-27 at the Wayback Machine. Cohen and Regan (2001) Singer (June 15, 2001) Archived September 14, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.

Halayen jama'a
Berg, Jennifer; Jackson, Chris (May 12, 2021). "Nearly nine in ten Americans consume meat as part of their diet". Ipsos. Archived from the original on July 20, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022
Wani civet, ko fox na teku, wanda aka dauki hotonsa a shekara ta 2001 a gidan Zoo na Zigong People's Park, Sichuan, ta Cibiyar Kariyar Dabbobi ta Asiya. An ajiye dabbar da yunwa domin baƙi su ciyar da shi raye-rayen raye-rayen da ke cikin leda.
A cewar wata takarda ta 2000 ta Harold Herzog da Lorna Dorr, binciken da aka yi a baya na ilimi game da halaye game da haƙƙin dabba ya kasance yana da ƙananan samfurori da ƙungiyoyi marasa wakilci. Herzog, Harold; Dorr, Lorna (2000). "Electronically Available Surveys of Attitudes Toward Animals". Society & Animals. 10 (2). da alama abubuwa da yawa suna da alaƙa da halayen mutane game da kula da dabbobi da haƙƙin dabbobi. Waɗannan sun haɗa da jinsi, shekaru, sana'a, addini, da matakin ilimi. Akwai kuma shaidun da ke nuna cewa kwarewa da dabbobin gida na iya zama sanadin halayen mutaneApostol, L.; Rebega, O.L.; Miclea, M. (2013). "Psychological and Socio-Demographic Predictors of Attitudes towards Animals". Social and Behavioural Sciences (78): 521–525.
DeLeeuwa, Jamie; Galen, Luke; Aebersold, Cassandra; Stanton, Victoria (2007). "Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination" (PDF). Society and Animals (15): 353–363. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2013.
Ka<mar yadda wasu bincike suka nuna, mata sun fi maza tausayin abin da ya shafi hakkin dabbobi fiye da mazaApostol, L.; Rebega, O.L.; Miclea, M. (2013). "Psychological and Socio-Demographic Predictors of Attitudes towards Animals". Social and Behavioural Sciences (78): 521–525. Herzog, Harold (2007). "Gender Differences in Human-Animal Interactions: A Review". Anthrozoös. 20 (1): 7–21. doi:10.2752/089279307780216687. S2CID 14988443.Wani bincike da aka gudanar a shekara ta 1996 ya nuna cewa abubuwan da za su iya bayyana wannan bambance-bambancen a wani bangare sun hada da halayen mata da kimiyya, ilimin kimiyya, da kasancewar fifiko mai girma kan "rayarwa ko tausayi" tsakanin mata[, Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
, Yon Soo; Valentino, Benjamin (July 26, 2019). "Who supports animal rights? Here's what we found". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
A) , Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04. Wani bincike da aka yi a shekara ta 2016 ya gano cewa tallafin gwajin dabbobi na iya zama ba bisa dalilai na falsafa ba kuma yana da garantin karin muhawarar da ake yi.Ethics - Animal ethics: Animal rights". BBC Online. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
Apostol, L.; Rebega, O.L.; Miclea, M. (2013). "Psychological and Socio-Demographic Predictors of Attitudes towards Animals". Social and Behavioural Sciences (78): 521–525.
Wani bincike da aka yi a shekara ta 2007 wanda yayi nazari akan ko mutanen da suka yi imani da juyin halitta sun fi tallafawa 'yancin dabba fiye da masu halitta da masu imani a cikin zane mai hankali ya gano cewa hakan ya kasance; a cewar masu bincike, kirista mai karfiJoffe, Ari R.; Bara, Meredith; Anton, Natalie; Nobis, Nathan (March 29, 2016). "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America". BMC Medical Ethics. 17: 17. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0100-x. ISSN 1472-6939. PMC 4812627. PMID 27025215. .Galvin, Shelley L.; Herzog, Harold A. Jr. (1992). "Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, And Attitudes Toward The Treatment Of Animals". Ethics & Behavior. 2 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1. PMID 11651362. Archived from the original on 2020-05-31. Retrieved 2020-08-29. binciken na 2017 ya sake maimaita shi ta hanyar masu bincike a Jami'ar Jihar Oklahoma, waɗanda suka sami irin wannan sakamakon: 73% na masu amsa sun amsa "eh" ga tambayar "Shin kun san cewa mayankan ne inda ake kashe dabbobi da sarrafa su zuwa nama, irin wannan, idan ba tare da su ba, ba za ku iya cin nama ba?"[92][93].
Ettinger, Jill (November 21, 2017). "70% of Americans Want Better Treatment for Farm Animals, Poll Finds". Organic Authority. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2022. Piper, Kelsey (November 5, 2018). "California and Florida voters could change the lives of millions of animals on Election Day". Vox. Archived from the original on 13 February 2022. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
A cikin Amurka, Ƙungiyar Manoman Ƙasa ta gudanar da kisan gilla ga jama'a da yawa a ƙarshen 1960s da farkon 1970s. Masu zanga-zangar rashin tsadar nama, manoma sun kashe dabbobinsu a gaban wakilan kafafen yada labarai. Gawarwakin sun lalace ba a ci ba. Wannan yunƙuri ya ci tura domin ya fusata mutane ganin yadda dabbobi ke kashewa ba tare da wata bukata ba"Compassion in World Farming – The farm animal welfare charity". Ciwf.org.uk. 16 December 2011. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
Reese Anthis, Jacy (November 20, 2017). "Animals, Food, and Technology (AFT) Survey 2017". Sentience Institute. Surveys. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved February
Binciken na 2017 ya sake maimaita shi ta hanyar masu bincike a Jami'ar Jihar Oklahoma, waɗanda suka sami irin wannan sakamakon: 73% na masu amsa sun amsa "eh" ga tambayar "Shin kun san cewa mayankan ne inda ake kashe dabbobi da sarrafa su zuwa nama, irin wannan, idan ba tare da su ba, ba za ku iya cin nama ba?"[Siegner, Cathy (January 25, 2018). "Survey: Most consumers like meat, slaughterhouses not so much". Food Dive. Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022 Norwood, Bailey; Murray, Susan. "FooDS Food Deman Survey, Volume 5, Issue 9: January 18, 2018" (PDF). Oklahoma State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2019. Retrieved February 13, 2022.

manazarta