Civil Rights Act of 1964

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ()di nya la  landmark civil rights ni labor law  United States tingbanni kadi outlaws bi deiri  boli yuoli zag kpa  ti nahin Gbana , ni ti nig gbenni kom , ni ti ninsal sili (doo bei pag a) ni ti da diini  puuni,  ni ti yinna tig shali . di bi zan tuhi Amaana dibo zag kpa application voter registibu requirements, racial segregation ti Shukuran  ,ni salo yig si ,ni  tuma Shei boli yoli . Act maa  "nyala din mali darza zag kpa legislative achievements American taarihi puunii kurinbuna ni ".

 Legislative history 

On  Yunni June 11, 1963, President Kennedy ni Republican leaders daa Zini la an gu ni bi di alizama zag kpa legislation yelli toa a poyi ko nan yinna televisa zug ti naa di lala alizama maa  din dalli maa yug. Daa baa Ayiii nyan ga , Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen mini Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield , bi zaa daa tab sog  president bill maa, gbaa yihi  provisions  guaranteeyibu din nya dede  access zanti solo beihigu Shei bei link solo ni Kalisi lug sha a . Di daa Che ka niribi Pam  I This lRepublican Representatives drafting a compromise bill to be considered. On June 19, the president sent his bill to Congress as it was originally written, saying legislative action was "imperative". The president's bill went first to the House of Representatives, where it was referred to the Judiciary Committee, chaired by New York Democrat Emanuel Celler. After a series of hearings on the bill, Celler's committee strengthened the act, adding provisions to ban racial discrimination in employment, providing greater protection to black voters, eliminating segregation in all publicly owned facilities (not just schools), and strengthening the anti-segregation clauses regarding public facilities such as lunch counters. They also added authorization for the Attorney General to file lawsuits to protect individuals against the deprivation of any rights secured by the Constitution or U.S. law. In essence, this was the controversial "Title III" that had been removed from the 1957 Act and 1960 Act. Civil rights organizations pressed hard for this provision because it could be used to protect peaceful protesters and black voters from police brutality and suppression of free speech rights.