CELEX ID: 52008XC0702(01)

--- ENGLISH ---

Document:
2.7.2008
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 167/1
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in cartel cases
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2008/C 167/01)
1.   INTRODUCTION
1.
This Notice sets out the framework for rewarding cooperation in the conduct of proceedings commenced in view of the application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty
 (
1
)
 to cartel cases
 (
2
)
. The settlement procedure may allow the Commission to handle more cases with the same resources, thereby fostering the public interest in the Commission's delivery of effective and timely punishment, while increasing overall deterrence. The cooperation covered by this Notice is different from the voluntary production of evidence to trigger or advance the Commission's investigation, which is covered by the Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases
 (
3
)
 (the Leniency Notice). Provided that the cooperation offered by an undertaking qualifies under both Commission Notices, it can be cumulatively rewarded accordingly
 (
4
)
.
2.
When parties to the proceedings are prepared to acknowledge their participation in a cartel violating Article 81 of the Treaty and their liability therefore, they may also contribute to expediting the proceedings leading to the adoption of the corresponding decision pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty
 (
5
)
 in the way and with the safeguards specified in this Notice. Whilst the Commission, as the investigative authority and the guardian of the Treaty empowered to adopt enforcement decisions subject to judicial control by the Community Courts, does not negotiate the question of the existence of an infringement of Community law and the appropriate sanction, it can reward the cooperation described in this Notice.
3.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty
 (
6
)
 lays down the core practical rules concerning the conduct of proceedings in antitrust cases including those applicable in the variant for settlement. In this regard, Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 bestows on the Commission the discretion whether to explore the settlement procedure or not in cartel cases, while ensuring that the choice of the settlement procedure cannot be imposed on the parties.
4.
Effective enforcement of Community competition law is compatible with full respect of the parties' rights of defence, which constitutes a fundamental principle of Community law to be respected in all circumstances, and in particular in antitrust procedures which may give rise to penalties. It follows that the rules established to conduct the Commission proceedings to enforce Article 81 of the Treaty should ensure that the undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned are afforded the opportunity effectively to make known their views on the truth and relevance of the facts, objections and circumstances put forward by the Commission
 (
7
)
, throughout the administrative procedure.
2.   PROCEDURE
5.
The Commission retains a broad margin of discretion to determine which cases may be suitable to explore the parties' interest to engage in settlement discussions, as well as to decide to engage in them or discontinue them or to definitely settle. In this regard, account may be taken of the probability of reaching a common understanding regarding the scope of the potential objections with the parties involved within a reasonable timeframe, in view of factors such as number of parties involved, foreseeable conflicting positions on the attribution of liability, extent of contestation of the facts. The prospect of achieving procedural efficiencies in view of the progress made overall in the settlement procedure, including the scale of burden involved in providing access to non-confidential versions of documents from the file, will be considered. Other concerns such as the possibility of setting a precedent might apply. The Commission may also decide to discontinue settlement discussions if the parties to the proceedings coordinate to distort or destroy any evidence relevant to the establishment of the infringement or any part thereof or to the calculation of the applicable fine. Distortion or destruction of evidence relevant to the establishment of the infringement or any part thereof may also constitute an aggravating circumstance within the meaning of point 28 of the Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003
 (
8
)
 (the Guidelines on fines), and may be regarded as lack of cooperation within the meaning of points 12 and 27 of the Leniency Notice. The Commission may only engage in settlement discussions upon the written request of the parties concerned.
6.
While parties to the proceedings do not have a right to settle, should the Commission consider that a case may, in principle, be suitable for settlement, it will explore the interest in settlement of all parties to the same proceedings.
7.
The parties to the proceedings may not disclose to any third party in any jurisdiction the contents of the discussions or of the documents which they have had access to in view of settlement, unless they have a prior explicit authorization by the Commission. Any breach in this regard may lead the Commission to disregard the undertaking's request to follow the settlement procedure. Such disclosure may also constitute an aggravating circumstance, within the meaning of point 28 of the Guidelines on fines and may be regarded as lack of cooperation within the meaning of points 12 and 27 of the Leniency Notice.
2.1.   Initiation of proceedings and exploratory steps regarding settlement
8.
Where the Commission contemplates the adoption of a decision pursuant to Article 7 and/or Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, it is required in advance to identify and recognize as parties to the proceedings the legal persons on whom a penalty may be imposed for an infringement of Article 81 of the Treaty.
9.
To this end, the initiation of proceedings pursuant to Article 11(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in view of adopting such a decision can take place at any point in time, but no later than the date on which the Commission issues a statement of objections against the parties concerned. Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 further specifies that, should the Commission consider it suitable to explore the parties' interest in engaging in settlement discussions, it will initiate proceedings no later than the date on which it either issues a statement of objections or requests the parties to express in writing their interest to engage in settlement discussions, whichever is the earlier.
10.
After the initiation of proceedings pursuant to Article 11(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, the Commission becomes the only competition authority competent to apply Article 81 of the Treaty to the case in point.
11.
Should the Commission consider it suitable to explore the parties' interest to engage in settlement discussions, it will set a time-limit of no less than two weeks pursuant to Articles 10a(1) and 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 within which parties to the same proceedings should declare in writing whether they envisage engaging in settlement discussions in view of possibly introducing settlement submissions at a later stage. This written declaration does not imply an admission by the parties of having participated in an infringement or of being liable for it.
12.
Whenever the Commission initiates proceedings against two or more parties within the same undertaking, the Commission will inform each of them of the other legal entities which it identifies within the same undertaking and which are also concerned by the proceedings. In such a case, should the concerned parties wish to engage in settlement discussions, they must appoint joint representatives duly empowered to act on their behalf by the end of the time-limit referred to in point 11. The appointment of joint representatives aims solely to facilitate the settlement discussions and it does not prejudge in any way the attribution of liability for the infringement amongst the different parties.
13.
The Commission may disregard any application for immunity from fines or reduction of fines on the ground that it has been submitted after the expiry of the time-limit referred to in point 11.
2.2.   Commencing the settlement procedure: settlement discussions
14.
Should some of the parties to the proceedings request settlement discussions and comply with the requirements referred to in points 11 and 12, the Commission may decide to pursue the settlement procedure by means of bilateral contacts between the Commission Directorate-General for Competition and the settlement candidates.
15.
The Commission retains discretion to determine the appropriateness and the pace of the bilateral settlement discussions with each undertaking. In line with Article 10a(2) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, this includes determining, in view of the progress made overall in the settlement procedure, the order and sequence of the bilateral settlement discussions as well as the timing of the disclosure of information, including the evidence in the Commission file used to establish the envisaged objections and the potential fine
 (
9
)
. Information will be disclosed in a timely manner as settlement discussions progress.
16.
Such an early disclosure in the context of settlement discussions pursuant to Article 10a(2) and Article 15(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 will allow the parties to be informed of the essential elements taken into consideration so far, such as the facts alleged, the classification of those facts, the gravity and duration of the alleged cartel, the attribution of liability, an estimation of the range of likely fines, as well as the evidence used to establish the potential objections. This will enable the parties effectively to assert their views on the potential objections against them and will allow them to make an informed decision on whether or not to settle. Upon request by a party, the Commission services will also grant it access to non-confidential versions of any specified accessible document listed in the case file at that point in time, in so far as this is justified for the purpose of enabling the party to ascertain its position regarding a time period or any other aspect of the cartel
 (
10
)
.
17.
When the progress made during the settlement discussions leads to a common understanding regarding the scope of the potential objections and the estimation of the range of likely fines to be imposed by the Commission, and the Commission takes the preliminary view that procedural efficiencies are likely to be achieved in view of the progress made overall, the Commission may grant a final time-limit of at least 15 working days for an undertaking to introduce a final settlement submission pursuant to Articles 10a(2) and 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004. The time-limit can be extended following a reasoned request. Before granting such time-limit, the parties will be entitled to have the information specified in point 16 disclosed to them upon request.
18.
The parties may call upon the Hearing Officer at any time during the settlement procedure in relation to issues that might arise relating to due process. The Hearing Officer's duty is to ensure that the effective exercise of the rights of defence is respected.
19.
Should the parties concerned fail to introduce a settlement submission, the procedure leading to the final decision in their regard will follow the general provisions, in particular Articles 10(2), 12(1) and 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, instead of those regulating the settlement procedure.
2.3.   Settlement submissions
20.
Parties opting for a settlement procedure must introduce a formal request to settle in the form of a settlement submission. The settlement submission provided for in Article 10a(2) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 should contain:
(a)
an acknowledgement in clear and unequivocal terms of the parties' liability for the infringement summarily described as regards its object, its possible implementation, the main facts, their legal qualification, including the party's role and the duration of their participation in the infringement in accordance with the results of the settlement discussions;
(b)
an indication
 (
11
)
 of the maximum amount of the fine the parties foresee to be imposed by the Commission and which the parties would accept in the framework of a settlement procedure;
(c)
the parties' confirmation that, they have been sufficiently informed of the objections the Commission envisages raising against them and that they have been given sufficient opportunity to make their views known to the Commission;
(d)
the parties' confirmation that, in view of the above, they do not envisage requesting access to the file or requesting to be heard again in an oral hearing, unless the Commission does not reflect their settlement submissions in the statement of objections and the decision;
(e)
the parties' agreement to receive the statement of objections and the final decision pursuant to Articles 7 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in an agreed official language of the European Community.
21.
The acknowledgments and confirmations provided by the parties in view of settlement constitute the expression of their commitment to cooperate in the expeditious handling of the case following the settlement procedure. However, those acknowledgments and confirmations are conditional upon the Commission meeting their settlement request, including the anticipated maximum amount of the fine.
22.
Settlement requests cannot be revoked unilaterally by the parties which have provided them unless the Commission does not meet the settlement requests by reflecting the settlement submissions first in a statement of objections and ultimately, in a final decision (see in this regard points 27 and 29). The statement of objections would be deemed to have endorsed the settlement submissions if it reflects their contents on the issues mentioned in point 20(a). Additionally, for a final decision to be deemed to have reflected the settlement submissions, it should also impose a fine which does not exceed the maximum amount indicated therein.
2.4.   Statement of objections and reply
23.
Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, the notification of a written statement of objections to each of the parties against whom objections are raised is a mandatory preparatory step before adopting any final decision. Therefore, the Commission will issue a statement of objections also in a settlement procedure
 (
12
)
.
24.
For the parties' rights of defence to be exercised effectively, the Commission should hear their views on the objections against them and supporting evidence before adopting a final decision and take them into account by amending its preliminary analysis, where appropriate
 (
13
)
. The Commission must be able not only to accept or reject the parties' relevant arguments expressed during the administrative procedure, but also to make its own analysis of the matters put forward by them in order to either abandon such objections because they have been shown to be unfounded or to supplement and reassess its arguments both in fact and in law, in support of the objections which it maintains.
25.
By introducing a formal settlement request in the form of a settlement submission prior to the notification of the statement of objections, the parties concerned enable the Commission to effectively take their views into account
 (
14
)
 already when drafting the statement of objections, rather than only before the consultation of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions (hereinafter the ‘Advisory Committee’) or before the adoption of the final decision
 (
15
)
.
26.
Should the statement of objections reflect the parties' settlement submissions, the parties concerned should within a time-limit of at least two weeks set by the Commission in accordance with Articles 10a(3) and 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, reply to it by simply confirming (in unequivocal terms) that the statement of objections corresponds to the contents of their settlement submissions and that they therefore remain committed to follow the settlement procedure. In the absence of such a reply, the Commission will take note of the party's breach of its commitment and may also disregard the party's request to follow the settlement procedure.
27.
The Commission retains the right to adopt a statement of objections which does not reflect the parties' settlement submission. If so, the general provisions in Articles 10(2), 12(1) and 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 will apply. The acknowledgements provided by the parties in the settlement submission would be deemed to be withdrawn and could not be used in evidence against any of the parties to the proceedings. Hence, the parties concerned would no longer be bound by their settlement submissions and would be granted a time-limit allowing them, upon request, to present their defence anew, including the possibility to access the file and to request an oral hearing.
2.5.   Commission decision and settlement reward
28.
Upon the parties' replies to the statement of objections confirming their commitment to settle, Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 allows the Commission to proceed, without any other procedural step, to the adoption of the subsequent final decision pursuant to Articles 7 and/or 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, after consultation of the Advisory Committee pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. In particular, this implies that no oral hearing or access to the file may be requested by those parties once their settlement submissions have been reflected by the statement of objections, in line with Articles 12(2) and 15(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004.
29.
The Commission retains the right to adopt a final position which departs from its preliminary position expressed in a statement of objections endorsing the parties' settlement submissions, either in view of the opinion provided by the Advisory Committee or for other appropriate considerations in view of the ultimate decisional autonomy of the Commission to this effect. However, should the Commission opt to follow that course, it will inform the parties and notify to them a new statement of objections in order to allow for the exercise of their rights of defence in accordance with the applicable general rules of procedure. It follows that the parties would then be entitled to have access to the file, to request an oral hearing and to reply to the statement of objections. The acknowledgments provided by the parties in the settlement submissions would be deemed to have been withdrawn and could not be used in evidence against any of the parties to the proceedings.
30.
The final amount of the fine in a particular case is determined in the decision finding an infringement pursuant to Article 7 and imposing a fine pursuant to Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
31.
In line with the Commission's practice, the fact that an undertaking cooperated with the Commission under this Notice during the administrative procedure will be indicated in the final decision, so as to explain the reason for the level of the fine.
32.
Should the Commission decide to reward a party for settlement in the framework of this Notice, it will reduce by 10 % the amount of the fine to be imposed after the 10 % cap has been applied having regard to the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003
 (
8
)
. Any specific increase for deterrence
 (
16
)
 used in their regard will not exceed a multiplication by two.
33.
When settled cases involve also leniency applicants, the reduction of the fine granted to them for settlement will be added to their leniency reward.
3.   GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
34.
This Notice applies to any case pending before the Commission at the time of or after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
35.
Access to settlement submissions is only granted to those addressees of a statement of objections who have not requested settlement, provided that they commit — together with the legal counsels getting access on their behalf — not to make any copy by mechanical or electronic means of any information in the settlement submissions to which access is being granted and to ensure that the information to be obtained from the settlement submission will solely be used for the purposes of judicial or administrative proceedings for the application of the Community competition rules at issue in the related proceedings. Other parties such as complainants will not be granted access to settlement submissions.
36.
The use of such information for a different purpose during the proceeding may be regarded as lack of cooperation within the meaning of points 12 and 27 of the Leniency Notice. Moreover, if any such use is made after the Commission has already adopted a prohibition decision in the proceedings, the Commission may, in any legal proceedings before the Community Courts, ask the Court to increase the fine in respect of the responsible undertaking. Should the information be used for a different purpose, at any point in time, with the involvement of an outside counsel, the Commission may report the incident to the bar of that counsel, with a view to disciplinary action.
37.
Settlement submissions made under this Notice will only be transmitted to the competition authorities of the Member States pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, provided that the conditions set out in the Network Notice
 (
17
)
 are met and provided that the level of protection against disclosure awarded by the receiving competition authority is equivalent to the one conferred by the Commission.
38.
Upon the applicant's request, the Commission may accept that settlement submissions be provided orally. Oral settlement submissions will be recorded and transcribed at the Commission's premises. In accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and Articles 3(3) and 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 undertakings making oral settlement submissions will be granted the opportunity to check the technical accuracy of the recording, which will be available at the Commission's premises and to correct the substance of their oral settlement submissions and the accuracy of the transcript without delay.
39.
The Commission will not transmit settlement submissions to national courts without the consent of the relevant applicants, in line with the provisions in the Commission Notice on the co-operation between the Commission and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 EC
 (
18
)
.
40.
The Commission considers that normally public disclosure of documents and written or recorded statements (including settlement submissions) received in the context of this Notice would undermine certain public or private interests, for example the protection of the purpose of inspections and investigations, within the meaning of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
 (
19
)
, even after the decision has been taken.
41.
Final decisions taken by the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 are subject to judicial review in accordance with Article 230 of the Treaty. Moreover, as provided in Article 229 of the Treaty and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, the Court of Justice has unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions on fines adopted pursuant to Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
Overview of the procedure leading to the adoption of a (settlement) Decision pursuant to Articles 7 and 23 of Regulation No (EC) 1/2003
I.   Investigation as usual
—
Parties may express their interest in a hypothetical settlement.
II.   Exploratory steps regarding settlement
—
Letter to all companies (and MS) informing of the decision to initiate proceedings in view of settlement (Article 11(6)) and requesting them to express their interest in settlement.
III.   Bilateral rounds of settlement discussions
—
Disclosure and exchange of arguments on potential objections, liability, fines range.
—
Disclosure of evidence used to establish potential objections, liability, fines.
—
Disclosure of other non-confidential versions of documents in the file, when justified.
IV.   Settlement
—
Conditional settlement submissions by the companies, jointly represented where applicable.
—
DG COMP sends acknowledgement of receipt.
V.   ‘Settled’ statement of objections
—
Notification of streamlined SO endorsing company's settlement submissions, where appropriate.
—
Company's reply to SO confirming clearly that it reflects its settlement submission.
VI.   ‘Settlement’ Decision pursuant to Articles 7 and 23 of Regulation No (EC) 1/2003
—
Advisory Committee on a draft streamlined final decision.
If College of Commissioners agrees:
—
Adoption of streamlined final decision.
(
1
)
  References in this text to Article 81 also cover Article 53 EEA when applied by the Commission in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 56 of the EEA Agreement.
(
2
)
  Cartels are agreements and/or concerted practices between two or more competitors aimed at coordinating their competitive behaviour on the market and/or influencing the relevant parameters of competition through practices such as the fixing of purchase or selling prices or other trading conditions, the allocation of production or sales quotas, the sharing of markets including bid-rigging, restrictions of imports or exports and/or anti-competitive actions against other competitors. Such practices are among the most serious violations of Article 81 EC.
(
3
)
  
OJ C 298, 8.12.2006, p. 17
.
(
4
)
  See point 33.
(
5
)
  
OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1
. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1419/2006 (
OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 1
).
(
6
)
  
OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 18
. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 (
OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 3
).
(
7
)
  Case 85/76, 
Hoffmann-La Roche
 v 
Commission
 [1979] ECR 461, at paragraphs 9 and 11.
(
8
)
  
OJ C 210, 1.9.2006, p. 2
.
(
9
)
  Reference to the ‘potential fine’ in Article 10a(2) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 affords the Commission services the possibility to inform the parties concerned by settlement discussions of an estimate of their potential fine in view of the guidance contained in the Guidelines on fines, the provisions of this Notice and the Leniency Notice, where applicable.
(
10
)
  For that purpose, the parties will be provided with a list of all accessible documents in the case file at that point in time.
(
11
)
  This would result from the discussions as set out in points 16 and 17.
(
12
)
  In the context of settlement procedures, statements of objections should contain the information necessary to enable the parties to corroborate that it reflects their settlement submissions.
(
13
)
  In line with settled case-law, the Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which the parties concerned have been able to comment and, to this end, they shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file, subject to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.
(
14
)
  In this regard, recital 2 of Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 states: ‘
(…) Such early disclosure should enable the parties concerned to put forward their views on the objections which the Commission intends to raise against them as well as on their potential liability
’.
(
15
)
  As required by Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 and Article 27(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, respectively.
(
16
)
  Point 30 of the Guidelines on fines.
(
17
)
  Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities (
OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p. 43
).
(
18
)
  
OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p. 54
; point 26.
(
19
)
  
OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43
.

Summary:
EU antitrust proceedings — rules for rewarding cooperation
SUMMARY OF:
Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of decisions pursuant to Articles 7 and 23 of Council Regulation (EC) 
No 1/2003
 in cartel cases
WHAT IS THE AIM OF THIS NOTICE?
It sets out the procedures and criteria for rewarding companies — through lower penalties — which admit to the 
European Commission
 that they have participated in an illegal cartel
1
.
It provides guidance for the legal and business communities.
The anti-competitive behaviour prevents the single market from operating smoothly and is illegal under 
Article 101
 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (formerly Article 81 of the Treaty on European Union).
KEY POINTS
The notice explains how the Commission applies the contents of the following 2 regulations in competition cases.
Regulation (EC) 
No 
1/2003
 (see 
summary
), especially Articles 7 and 23,
Regulation (EC) 
No 
773/2004
 (see 
summary
).
The Commission, in the settlement process:
does not negotiate whether EU law has been infringed; nor does it negotiate the appropriate sanction;
decides whether to explore a possible settlement or not, depending on the chances of a successful outcome, and may stop the procedure in certain circumstances;
may not impose a settlement procedure on the companies involved;
respects fully the parties’ right of defence to respond to the truth and relevance of the facts, objections and circumstances it puts forward — a principle underlined in Hoffmann-La 
Roche & Co
 AG v Commission of the European Communities (Case 
85/76
).
Procedure
Opening proceedings and exploratory steps
The Commission:
identifies the legal persons facing a possible penalty;
gives the parties concerned two weeks to reply in writing stating whether they envisage participating in settlement discussions;
acknowledges that an affirmative reply does not mean the parties admit they have broken EU law;
writes to all parties concerned, and EU countries, informing them of the start of the settlement process and asking them to express their interest.
Settlement discussions
The Commission:
may decide to have bilateral contact with those concerned;
determines the suitability and pace of the bilateral discussions;
must disclose information in a timely manner so the parties involved are aware of the alleged facts, their gravity and range of likely fines to enable them to make an informed decision on whether or not to settle;
grants a company a final time limit of 15 working days to table its definitive settlement submission, if it believes sufficient progress has been made in their discussions.
Settlement submissions
The companies involved formally request to settle by presenting a 
settlement submission
, which they may not unilaterally withdraw later. It contains:
clear and unequivocal acknowledgment of their liability for the illegal behaviour;
an indication of the maximum fines they envisage the Commission imposing and which they would accept within the settlement procedure;
confirmation they have been sufficiently informed of the Commission’s case against them and have had adequate opportunity to reply;
agreement that they do not envisage having access to the case file or an oral hearing, unless they consider the Commission, in the next phase, does not accurately reflect their submission;
agreement to receive the Commission’s reply (known as the statement of objections) to their submissions.
Statement of objections
The Commission:
takes into account the arguments of fact and law that the companies presented in their submissions;
accepts or rejects those arguments and may amend its preliminary analysis where appropriate;
gives the companies concerned at least 2 weeks to confirm they remain committed to following the settlement procedure, when it accepts the contents of their submissions;
grants a new time limit to a company whose submission was not addressed in order to allow that company, if it wishes, to present a new defence; the company may also possibly be granted access to the file and a request for an oral hearing;
may decide to adopt a statement that departs from a company’s submission, and so the case reverts to the ordinary procedure.
Commission decision and settlement reward
The Commission:
consults national officials on the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions;
reduces by 10% the fine levied on a company which cooperates throughout the settlement process.
may decide to adopt a final decision that differs from the statement of objections endorsed by the parties, where this happens the case reverts to the ordinary procedure. In such circumstances, it issues another statement of objections, allowing the company concerned to have access to the file, request an oral hearing and reply to the new statement.
In parallel, the Commission has issued a 
notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases
 (the Leniency Notice).
FROM WHEN DOES THE NOTICE APPLY?
It has applied since 
2 July 2008
.
BACKGROUND
The settlement procedure speeds up the Commission’s investigations into cartels by simplifying the various procedures when companies admit their guilt.
This allows the Commission to handle more cases with the same resources, deliver effective and timely punishment and strengthen overall deterrence.
For more information, see: 
Settlement procedure for cartels
 (
European Commission
).
KEY TERMS
Cartel:
 an agreement between 2 or more competitors to rig the market by fixing prices or quotas, restricting imports or exports and other anti-competitive behaviour.
MAIN DOCUMENT
Commission 
Notice
 on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) 
No 1/2003
 in cartel cases (OJ C 167, 
2.7.2008
, 
pp. 1-6
)
Successive amendments to the notice have been incorporated into the original text. This 
consolidated version
 is of documentary value.
RELATED DOCUMENTS
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Part Three — Union policies and internal actions — Title VII — Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws — Chapter 1 — Rules on competition — Section 1 — Rules applying to undertakings — 
Article 101
 (ex Article 81 TEC) (OJ C 202, 
7.6.2016
, 
pp. 88-89
)
Commission 
Notice
 on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (OJ C 298, 
8.12.2006
, 
pp. 17-22
)
Communication from the Commission — 
Amendments to the Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases
 (OJ C 256, 
5.8.2015
, 
p. 1
)
Commission Regulation (EC) 
No 
773/2004
 of 
7 April 2004
 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 123, 
27.4.2004
, 
pp. 18-24
)
See 
consolidated version
.
Council Regulation (EC) 
No 
1/2003
 of 
16 December 2002
 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 
4.1.2003
, 
pp. 1-25
)
See 
consolidated version
.
last update 
20.5.2020

--- DANISH ---

Document:
$da_document

Summary:
$da_summary