Examples of Bias in Conservapedia

Some feel that Conservapedia is a joke site for liberal elitists who makes fun of Conservative Americans. "Conservative American" is an old German term which roughly means "a intelligent, sensible person not wholly educated man with a mullet and a belt buckle of exaggerated size". Conservapedia is like Wikipedia, but with the satirical slant of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Hell, even most Christians (who aren't flag-waving idiots) think Conservapedia is biased! But of course, these Americans are dirty Communist swine who should burn in hell, according to Schafly. By contrast, according to New Conservapedia the Old Conservapedia is no longer truly conservative, and those who work with it are therefore destined for Hell alongside Liberals.
Curiously, being a straight-faced accidental satire of both Christians and Conservatives, it has almost the same humor potential as Uncyclopedia, even if that humor is unintentional. The site has only one accurate page.
==Statistics==
The wiki currently consists of approximately over 9000 articles, none of which are crap. We tried to add "crap" to Conservapedia, as well as pages on other important, socially relevant subjects such as Niggers, but were rebuffed, as users require a signed note from their pastor or minister stating that they love Jesus, love "science" or at least our version of science, and prefer Folgers Crystals over the house brand of coffee.
Of the 3,800 articles, 1,800 use the Bible as a reference and a full 3,100 use either Answers in Genesis or Christian homeschooling textbooks as references. AIG, a website, and Abeka, a publisher of textbooks for homeschooling, each cover a wide variety of subjects including Biblical History, American History, and American Biblical History, in a rational, evidence-based manner based on solid scientific research in such diverse fields as archaeology, physics and astronomy. Yeah, right.
==Examples of bias==
This list is divided into two sections: The first section lists examples of bias which are made by despicable people like atheists, Jews, liberal Christians, Muslims, and Uncyclopedians. The second section lists examples where conservatives claim that Conservapedia is too liberal. Note that many of these examples will be out of date, as Conservapedia is a wiki. Luckily, since Conservapedians are out of date, with their mullets, caterpillar baseball caps, and wife-beater t-shirts, this isn't a big problem.
==Examples of bias according to atheists, liberals and other scum==
# Uncyclopedia article claims that Uncyclopedia is a parody of Wikipedia, when in fact the opposite is true.
# Abraham Lincoln is missing the quote "If zealots ever take over my party, please shoot me in the head.". It also doesn't mention that there's no way in Hell he could win the Republican nomination if he were to run for president today. Which is probably for the best, as he's dead. But since he's dead, he's still eligible, of course. Also, he could scratch his knees without bending over (see fig. 1)
# Homosexuality is woefully incomplete. Perhaps not enough time has been spent by Conservatives researching this subject in the field. How can you condemn it if you haven't tried it? There isn't even any reference to Muff Diving or Gaydar.
# Adolf Hitler completely misses the fact that he was a Christian and, as a Christian, he killed six million Jews. And of course, since he was a Christian, Christians are all evil because he was. However, atheists are NOT to be compared to Stalin or Mao. If you do this, you will have to be healed in a mental institution. 
# IPs are unable to make edits of any kind, which indicates a bias against people who think that things are "Teh ghey".
# There are no articles on certain controversial yet extremely important and significant issues and people, such as most of these, handily organized by year for your viewing pleasure.
# There are no entries for sex, intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus or orgasm because such perverted subjects are COMPLETELY unnecessary which explains why True Christians™ are so twitchy all the time. This is probably for the best, as there are no pages on birth control, either. There is a page for abortion, but it consists primarily of the health risks, including cancer (their logic for this is infallible: women who breastfeed lower their risk of breast cancer + women who get abortions don't have babies to breastfeed = women who get abortions get cancer. Or maybe it's ineffable. It's so easy to get the two confused).
# There are no entries for BDSM or Bondage
# Unicorns says that they exist in the Bible (and may be alive today) but that they don't look like horses. This is totally backwards.
# Tower of Babel does not mention that the so called tower was actually only five inches tall and had a revolving restaurant on the top floor.
# Satan doesn't mention that his parties have the best cocaine.
# There are no articles for either Penis or Vagina because again, such pages are completely unecessary, but the pages are protected to prevent procreation.
# Being the ironic bastards they are, Neutrality is the most biased article on the website. ("not any more i changed it" sirjj)
# Neoconservative mentions the word libertarian four times. Libertarians are fictional, much like unicorns and Germany.
#Liberal lists many beliefs of all liberals. All of the beliefs are unconservative and, therefore, communist, godless and evil. These evil dogmas include: "...more rights for women than for men equal rights for men and women...teaching that we are nothing but animals and are to act as such with each other teaching of evolution...worship of animals and killing humans for their sake protection of endangered species...hating Americans racial equality...". Stupid Fuckin' liberals... It also uses the word 'liberal' out of context (ie. Drinking liberally). But that's not to say liberals AREN'T polygamist, communist, Che t-shirt sporting, abortionist atheists! Who hate America
# Kangaroos supposedly disembarked the ark in the middle east and travelled by land to Australia before Pangaea broke apart, or built rafts and floated over to the continent.
# Jesus suggests that Jesus is actually real, even though he obviously isn't. The same applies with God, and several other articles about people who don't exist or never existed, including most of the cast of the Old Testament and the rest of the heaven bedtime bunch. 
# Homosexual agenda assumes that "they" are here, that "they" are queer, and that "you" should get used to it. It also ignores that "they" broke for lunch at 12:05PM, and that while at lunch "they" had a delightful tossed salad with wine spritzers followed by petit fours that were positively to die for. Also, it fails to note that "Ted" pinched my bottom and that "I" was so stunned by "his" forwardness that "I" forgot to comment on "his" hair.
# Homeschooling has an audio attachment of a Christian Rock band covering "Hot for Teacher", but fails to give Van Halen credit for the original.
#Structured talk on gays don't get me started on this one. It's my favourite article. 
# God's page humorously pretends that he exists and that he gives a fuck what you do with your crotch.
# Earth Not really biased, but amusing enough to put on this page. Apparently, it is made of "rock" and has albino. They also make out the Earth is the centre of the Universe (no seriously, I am not making this up! Look up "geocentric theory") 
# Genesis completely ignores the considerable stylistic and lyrical contributions of Peter Gabriel.
# Christian apologetics does not mention the fact that atheist, skeptical Christian Apologists are big-time winners losers that have no lives not that tits like Earl Doherty or Acharya S have any more of a life than they do. It also mentions "rational" and "faith" in the same sentence because the two are perfectly compatible, unlike "rationalism" which is even more blind faith than Christianity, which is a little like a page that talks about "freezing flaming ice" or "healthy delicious vegetables".
# Common Era suggests that the CE dating system was "an attempt to erase recognition for the Christian basis of the calendar". The reality is that Conservapedia created the BC/AD system to erase recognition of the fact that Christianity is a load of crap.
# Charles Darwin has absolutely nothing to say about the length of his beard, possibly the most important fact about Mr. Darwin.
# Dick Cheney doesn't mention that he has carpal tunnel syndrome from pulling the President's strings for so long or that his Penguin impression still cracks up his wife after all these years.
# Dinosaurs gets at least some details right, like they were vegetarians while in the garden of Eden, and coexisted with Man after being created by the LORD on the sixth day approximately 6,000 years ago, as clearly proven by the legendary creature of the dragon, which has been depicted many times alongside human beings. However, they fail to extend this logic to proof of the existence of griffins, gorgons or centaurs. These creatures must have been liberals.
# Easter politely doesn't mention that the pagans stole the holiday and claim (to this very day) that they invented it first, years before the Son of God invented it. Damn pagans... It also fails to mention the Easter Bunny, the existence of which is clearly proven by the legend and numerous depictions alongside human beings.
# Examples of Bias in Wikipedia seems to suggest Wikipedia is a bad website. In actual fact, according to all Internet critics, it is a grand slam shithouse website (Whew! Good thing they didn't say anything about Uncyclopedia ;-).
# Uncyclopedia oh, bad luck there.
# Mike Huckabee does not give due credit to the man who made him, Stephen Colbert Jon Stewart Conan O'Brien Chuck Norris. No lie.
# Code Geass Consistently refers to Japanese people as "Elevens" and labels those who fight against the oppressive and racist Britannian occupation as "terrorists".
# The article on human evolution has been locked to prevent the left wing bastards from creating it. It is done to stop the liberals and atheists from worshipping Charles Darwin.
# The article on Boy George refuses to acknowledge his charitable work with National Cheese Federation, his removal of a thorn from a lion's ass, or anything else remotely positive about him.
# The article on Dick Cheney claimed that he was still vice-President of the United States for two whole days after he left office. The editors were such dicks that for a time they refused to accept the fact that he hd been replaced by a liberal.
#The only example of Open Mindedness is... Conservapedia! Surprise!
#their article on the video game industry seriously thinks Starcraft 2 promotes Islam but does not acknowledge that the Final Fantasy series is the gayest thing to ever come from Japan.
==Examples of Bias according to God-fearing patriotic Christians==
# There are articles for Red State and Blue State, but no article for 'JesusLand'.
# Actinium, #89 on the periodic table, fails to note that, among the metals, it's Pat Robertson's favorite element. His #1 favorite is Lithium, as that is like the Trinity, being third on the table. It's also the first thing those friendly doctors give him when he goes into the white, padded rooms! Yip
# Adolf Hitler He killed six million Jews, not because killing Jews is something that Christians have been doing for around two thousand years or so but because he was influenced by the evil Charles Darwin.
# Age of the Earth only devotes four sections of its list to the Truth™ that God made the universe six thousand years ago. Meanwhile the heresies of the Hindus, Chinese and Greeks get one whole paragraph each. Also, it spends a significant amount of time on radiocarbon dating, ignoring the fact that God messed with it, just to fuck with us. He's cool like that. YAY JESUS!
# An Inconvenient Truth used to state that "The film ignores the evidence that atmospheric temperature is cyclical in nature and has gone up and down hundreds of times in the last million years" while in reality the atmosphere could not have fluctuated over millions of years since the world is only 6000 years old. 
# The Rapture ignores that it will be a musical.
# The Renaissance uses terms like "humanism" and "science" without the accompanying emoticon indicating a raspberry (:P)
# Liberal media claims that many Americans have turned to blogs and talk radio for news. This is inaccurate, since most bloggers are more liberal than liberal Jewish gay niggers, and much of talk radio is talk, not news.
# Hell doesn't mention that they aren't going there. And doesn't mention enough about how all the gays are going there. Nor does it mention the cheap housing by the sea of lava.
# George W. Bush specifically notes that he (probably) did not rig the 2000 election, but does not mention how he should have because God would have wanted it that way. 
# Atheism fails to mention that all atheists are people who hate God. Every God-damned last one of 'em! And they deserve it! 
# Is the Bible Inerrant This article actually suggests that G-d's word may be fallible. Need I say more?
# Conservapedia often cites Answers in Genesis in their references. Though it is clearly stated in Aig website that it is satire it is a website that most Christians find offensive. 
#The article about Landover Baptist Church Godâs favorite church has been locked to prevent editing.
#The article for "Fetus" is longer than the article for "Unborn Child", and the "Unborn Child" article is being considered for deletion. This shows a preference for pro-abortion terminology.
#Sea level increase doesn't mention the most rapid sea level increase of all time, at the start of The Great Flood.
#Even some parts of the Bible are too Liberal for Andy Schlafly.
==See also==
*Conservapedia
*Conservatroll
*Crazy Jesus' Discount Evangelical Emporium
==Self-references==
*Examples of Bias in Conservapedia
Category:Wiki
Category:Conservapedia
Category:FA Internet
Category:FA Politics