Crocoduck

The Crocoduck is a hypothetical animal, intelligently designed by Creationists, and intended to demonstrate two things:
#What evilutionists ACTUALLY BELIEVE
#That evolution fails to account for (so-called) "missing links"
Crocoduck inventors Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort argue that the (intentionally bizarre?) Crocoduck is representative of what evolutionary theory actually teaches.You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, but You Can't Make Him Think: Answers to Questions from Angry Skeptics, p. 30.
The idea behind mocking up this hilarious mongrel was to make nonbelievers look stupid — a plan which backfired completely. Unsurprisingly, the mere conception of anything as half-baked as a 'Crocoduck' successfully communicated the polar opposite message — with the Crocoduck fast becoming a running gag in the reality-based community.
Honorable mentions include PZ Myers owning a Crocoduck-patterned tie (which he hilariously wore at the Creation Museum),As seen on WikiMedia. and Atheist YouTuber "King Crocoduck" honoring this timeless Creationist as his nom de plume.https://www.youtube.com/user/kingcrocoduck Every October 28th, Potholer54 also hands out a Golden Crocoduck Award to one lucky Creationist;https://www.facebook.com/GoldenCrocoduckAward/
 
== A meme is born ==
thumb|left|"♫ TAA-DAAAH! ♫"
The Crocoduck's non-existence was first brought to light by Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort, during a 2007 debate on the existence of God (held at in Manhattan) — parts of which aired on — wherein the duo explained their brilliant scheme:
Consider their admission that the point of the Crocoduck was to "show exactly what evolutionists believe". No wonder the Crocoduck has become widely symbolic of the fact that evolution deniers tend not to understand even the basic principles of evolutionary theory.
While simply presenting the audience with their homebrew Crocoduck alone would clearly have been stupid enough to make their point, Kirk and Ray actually figured it was reasonable to present two additional creations of theirs — the "Sheep-dog" and "Bull-frog", respectively.
The lack of creative talent available to this dynamic duo becomes all the more obvious when considering that both " and " already name animals which even Ray and Kirk must reasonably know exist.
== Why it's bullshit ==
It goes without saying that the Creationist expectation of a transitional form being akin to "an individual chimaera of two random species" is not even wrong, and stems from their willful ignorance of how evolution even works. As such, the Crocoduck is a perfect example of the straw man fallacy of over-simplifying the opponent's argument — in this case, the scientific view on the nature of the fossil record.
Crocodiles and ducks have not had a common ancestor for 245 million years; their closest fossil common ancestor, was far more like a crocodile than a duck, but both crocs and ducks have a mix of primitive and advanced features from their common ancestor, the basal 
Just for the sake of argument, a purported Crocoduck (or similar chimaera) would be a most astonishing find indeed. Creationists purport that Crocoduck-type chimaeras are what evolutionary theory rests on. But if such a fossilized chimaera was ever uncovered, it would in fact serve as evidence against evolution as understood by modern biologists.
Hence, the Crocoduck argument demonstrates that Creationists fail to understand the most basic claims made by the theory of evolution, and as such, literally don't even realize that they don't know what they're talking about.
=="Real Crocoducks"==
Various fossil species can be argued to be "Crocoducks", due to convergent evolution:
* like and had feathers, which would kind of make them Crocoducks by any reasonable definition of the term. As dromaeosaurs were close cousins to birdshttp://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/2870 and were distantly related to crocodiles by virtue of both being archosaurs ancestrally... yeah, but, you know, whatever, it's not like Creationists know how taxonomy actually works. One group, , likely even swam like ducks!
* In 2009, fossils of duck-billed alligators were found. The genus has been named (literally, "duck crocodile"). Although it would be more accurately be called a "duckodile" as the positions of duck and crocodile are reversed between this and the original theory; we are anxiously waiting to see what chimaera Creationists will howl about next.
*False-toothed birds () were a family of seabirds with a superficially crocodile-like beak and teeth.
* was an aquatic-adapted dinosaur with a long jaw, described by one paleontologist as "a chimera — half duck, half crocodile."
* was a monotreme related to modern platypuses. Like them (as, as it turns out, unlike many extinct monotremes, which had no evidence of beaks), it has a beak, albeit full of teeth. It foraged pelagically, making it more akin to a crocodile or an otter than the mostly bottom-feeding modern platypus.
==Gallery==
File:PZ Myers (1).jpg|PZ Myers trolling Creationists with his Crocoduck tie at the Creation Museum.
File:Fred_Wierum_Velociraptor.png|Artist's impression of a feathered Velociraptor.
File:KingCrocoduck.png|Queen King Crocoduck's crowned version. The bowtie is a nice touch.
File:Spinosaurus attacking Onchopristis.jpg|Fossil reconstruction of a Spinosaurus attacking an Onchopristis numidus, a species of extinct sawfish.
File:GoldenCrocoduckAward.jpg|A Golden Crocoduck Award, as awarded annually by Potholer54 to one lucky liar.
File:Pelagornis miocaenus.jpg|Fossil reconstruction of Pelagornis miocaenus.
File:Спинозавр_-_новая_реконструкция.jpg|Artist's depiction of a Spinosaurus.
==See also==
*Potholer54, host of the Golden Crocoduck Awards.
*Not even wrong
*Peanut butter argument
*Banana fallacy
*Fractal wrongness
*Non sequitur
*Willful ignorance
*Wronger than wrong
===Want to read this in another language?===
==References==
Category:Creationism
Category:Ray Comfort
Category:Transitional fossils