Capalert

Capalert is a website run by the "ChildCare Action Project" (CAP), a Christian "ministry" known mostly for reviewing movies from a Christian perspective. It was started in 1994 by Thomas Carder, who runs the website from his home in Texas.
==Mission==
Carder's mission is to review as much entertainment as possible, count all the examples of sin in each, and list them on his website. He feels that by doing this, he is informing all the other fundamentalist Christians about what sins are in the movie. He's mostly concentrated on film, but he's also rated at least one TV show (Dilbert), and he's hinted at covering other media as well, such as video games. He also includes a large "about the pastor" section where he points out that he has been in an adulterous relationship with his previously married and then divorced wife.From the Pastor, capalert.com. Apparently biblical injunctions are only for other people. He also has that "coming soon to an airport stall near you" air of protesting a wee bit too loudly about homosexuality.The portrayal of lesbian intimacy in the films Kissing Jessica Stein and Mulholland Drive made Carder walk out of the movie theater.
==Methodology==
The CAP methodology is, to say the least, complicated. If there is one thing that becomes apparent while reading the website (aside from Carder's odd reading of the Bible and his strange definition of "objective"), it's his love of numbers.
Every film starts out with 100 points, and each instance of sin causes it to lose points; the idea, of course, being that movies with higher scores are more suitable for Christian audiences (from Carder's perspective, anyway). He categorizes every sin into six investigation areas that form the clever acronym WISDOM: Wanton Violence/Crime, Impudence (originally Impunity), Sexual Immorality, Drugs/Alcohol, Offense to God, and Murder/Suicide. He then runs the data he's collected through over thirtyWherein Carder tells people that reviewing movies and griping about them is expensive. calculations on a computer. Apparently, without this, some films would earn a negative score in some areas.
All this is then compiled into his final review, containing five key elements: a traffic light meant to intend its ballpark palatability (almost always red), a thermometer that shows visually how the movie scored in the six investigation areas, the findings/scoring section that itemizes each sin shown in the movie, a summary/commentary section where Carder discusses the movie and often summarizes the plot, and a scriptural reference section where he cites scripture to back up his assertions. If the movie is a remake or sequel, Carder will also typically include a side-by-side comparison of the thermometer scores that each of the films have received.The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 review, capalert.com.Somehow, Carder managed to sit through all five movies. Poor sod.
Carder claims that everything listed in his Findings/Scoring section of a film's analysis is objectiveCAP Methodology, capalert.com. and that the CAP analysis model is objective. It can only be assumed that Carder feels that using math makes a film review objective, despite the fact that what calculations to use, how to categorize the various sins, and even how to interpret the Bible are all subjective in nature.
==Notable reviews==
Four movies have earned a score of 0: Scary Movie, Sin City, American Psycho, and Freddy vs Jason.
Six movies have earned a score of 100: Baby Miracle Volume 1: The Story of Creation, Grandpa Friendly's Workshop: Making Friends, Hurleyville, Episode 1: One God, Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution, Vol. 1,Sadly, this film does not give a profile of the crocoduck. Who Gets the House, and Mary Poppins.
Mary Poppins was the first movie Carder rated to have a perfect score, and it remains the only theatrically-released movie to have such a score. Poppins is, if you think about it, cut from the same cloth as the vile Harry Potter movies. It has magic, mischief, and children disobeying their elders, on top of the fact that series creator P. L. Travers dabbled in the occult; all things Carder has taken a strong stand against. Carder contrasts Poppins to Harry Potter - even though both characters use magic for good, Potter's explicit use of "witchcraft/sorcery/wizardry" marks him out as ultimately serving evil, but Carder feels Poppins "could have been portraying an angel".Mary Poppins review, capalert.com.
Carder's review of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the fourth Harry Potter movie, shows a kind of exasperation with Harry Potter and the wave of fantasy movies. In that movie review, Carder quotes Steven Kossor, his "Director of Child Psychology Support" (he never names Kossor, but he names the position) as saying:
He then goes on to say how bad that is and talk about Jesus throwing himself off a cliff and angels picking him back up.
The quote is used again, in a review of the movie Sky High (about a high school for superheroes). In that review, Carder said:
When he feels like being sophisticated, Carder turns to psychology instead of the Bible to make people not see movies about magic, and arbitrarily applies this to superpowers too. This seems to contradict his earlier statement about Mary Poppins.
In his review of Hellboy, Carder interpreted the title character to be the beast of the Apocalypse, and was offended by the idea that he could choose to be good.Hellboy review, capalert.com. Apparently free will is an un-Christian value.
==Fun with objectivity==
The Capalert website is rife with oddly-classified "sins" and examples of subjective Biblical interpretation. 
In his review of K-19: The Widowmaker, Carder lists "story tension episodes, action violence" under Wanton Violence/Crime, as though such things were both against the law and the teaching of Jesus Christ. No scriptural citations are made to support this.
In his review of Herbie: Fully Loaded, Carder classifies "open mouth kissing" under Sexual Immorality. Likewise, in his review of Disturbia, he classifies "teen girl in teen boy's bedroom without supervision" under Sexual Immorality. 'Nuff said.
Carder is also fond of listing tattoos and piercings under Impudence/Hate, but never cites scripture or otherwise elaborates on it.
==Relationship with the MPAA==
Carder is distrustful of the Motion Picture Association of America, who he feels does a disservice to children and parents by rating movies in a manner inconsistent with biblical teachings. This view was solidified by his "discovery" of "ratings creep". Carder noticed that some PG-13 movies had as much sin in them as some R rated movies,Carder's PG-13 -> R comparison. and calls these moves "R-13." Because of this, Carder has created a complicated CAP-to-MPAA rating guide where he notes the MPAA rating and the rating he feels it deserves based on the amount of sin in the film.
Harvard also seems to have "discovered" ratings creep,Sharon Waxman, Study Finds Film Ratings Are Growing More Lenient. Archived from The New York Times, 14 July 2014. but Carder claims to have discovered it first.Harvard Agrees with him! Four Years After He Proved It!
==The Bible==
A great many sins are described in the Bible, so by Carder’s standards, children would be best off avoiding this unsuitable material, but Carder will never admit this.here Carder explains why he won't apply the same methodology to the Bible and here we see his review of The Passion of the Christ and his treatment of religious subjects -- he gives it a barely-passable score of 69. For example, the Bible tells kids (and adults) to hate their parents.The Gospel According to Luke, Chapter 14, The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. Luke 14:26: "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." Carder takes off points for any suggestion of rebellion against parents.
==Quotes==
;The House on Haunted Hill
;Brokeback Mountain
;School of Rock
;Pinocchio
;Lord of the Rings
;The Nutty Professor II
;The Rocky Horror Picture Show
==Movies Carder has walked out on==
Sometimes, Carder is so offended by a movie that he leaves in the middle; in this case, he simply compiles a full review with the sins that he saw before leaving. Carder claims that this doesn't negatively impact the report, perhaps under the logic that every sound Christian would surely leave anyway after seeing such an offensive sight as… er, the Buddy Christ.
;Dogma
;In the Cut
;Kissing Jessica Stein
;Mulholland Drive
;Slackers
;Sleepover
== See also==
*Censorship
*Plugged-In Online, Focus on the Family's pop culture reviews site
==External links==
*The teacup of the storm. Updated to 2011! Dig that authentic late-'90s website design!
==Notes==
==References==
Category:Fundamentalist Christian websites
category:Christianity
Category:Censorship
Category:Webshites
Category:Homophobia
Category:Purity culture