Carolyn Miller

Carolyn Rae Miller (B. 29 April 1945) is SAS Institute Distinguished Professor of Rhetoric and Technical Communication Emerita at North Carolina State University. In 2006 she won the Rigo Award for Lifetime Achievement in Communication Design from the ACM-SIGDOC (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group in Design of Communication) and in 2016 the Cheryl Geisler Award for Outstanding Mentor, the Rhetoric Society of America. She is a Fellow of the Association of Teachers of Technical Writing (1995) and of the Rhetoric Society of America. Her “groundbreaking and influential article”Bawarshi, A. S. & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, p. 62. ISBN 978-1602351707 on “Genre as Social Action” Is foundational for Rhetorical Genre Studies. Three of her articles have been identified as essential works in Technical Communication.Alred, G. J. (2003). Essential Works on Technical Communication. Technical Communication 50:4, 585–615.
== Education ==
Carolyn Miller was born in Boston, grew up in State College, Pennsylvania, studied at Carleton College, and graduated Pennsylvania State University with Honors in English in1967. The following year she received her M.A. in English from the same institution and in 1980 received a Ph.D. in Communication and Rhetoric from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute with a dissertation on “Environmental Impact Statements and Rhetorical Genres.”
== Academic Career ==
Professor Miller began her teaching career at North Carolina State University as an Instructor in 1973, was advanced to Assistant Professor in 1980, Associate Professor in 1983, and Full Professor in 1990. There in 1988, she was the founding director of a master’s program in technical communication and in 2005 a doctoral program in communication, rhetoric, and digital media. In 2005 she was named SAS Institute Distinguished Professor of Rhetoric and Technical Communication, retiring in 2015. She has been visiting professor at Michigan Technological University (1988), Pennsylvania State University (1988), Georgia Institute of Technology (1991), Federal University of Pernambuco (2007), and University of Louisville (2013).https://chass.ncsu.edu/people/crmiller/
== Publications ==
Her article “Genre as Social Action” is cited as foundational for rhetorical genre studiesFreedman, A. (1999). Beyond the Text: Towards Understanding the Teaching and Learning of Genres. TESOL Quarterly 33 (4): 764–767. doi: 10.2307/3587890. and has been identified as an essential work in Technical Communication It is the most-cited article published in the Quarterly Journal of Speech. It has been translated into Norwegian,Miller, C. (2001). Genre som Sosial Handling. trans. Kjell Lars Berge. Rhetorica Scandinavica 18: 19–35. Portuguese,Miller, C. (2009). Gênero como ação social, trans. Judith Hoffnagel. Estudos sobre Gênero Textual, Agência, e Tecnologia. Recife, Brazil: Editora Universitária UFPE, 21–44. ISBN‎ 978-8579340468 and German,Miller, C. (2020). Gattung als soziale Handlung. Gattungsheorie, ed. Paul Keckeis and Werner Michle. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 212–241. https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/gattungstheorie-t-9783518297797 · ISBN 978-3518297797 has been reprinted in English three times,Freedman, A & Medway, P. (Eds.) (1994) Genre and the New Rhetoric. Ed. Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway.London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 3–42. ISBN 978-0748402571Farrell, T. B. (Ed.) 1998. Landmark Essays on Contemporary Rhetoric. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123–141. ISBN 978-1880393109 Miller, C. R. & Devitt, A. J. (Eds.) (2018). Landmark Essays in Rhetorical Genre Studies. New York: Routledge. pp. 36–54. ISBN 978-1138047709 and has been the subject of special issues of the journals Composition ForumDryer, D. (ed.) (2015). Special Issue: Rhetorical Genre Studies. Composition Forum Vol. 31, http://compositionforum.com/issue/31/ and the Canadian Journal for the Study of Discourse and Writing.Canadian Journal for the Study of Discourse and Writing Vol. 30, 2020; https://journals.sfu.ca/dwr/index.php/dwr/issue/view/81 In it Miller connects the concept of rhetorical situation characterized by Lloyd Bitzer with the phenomenological and sociological tradition of Alfred Schutz through the concept of typification. She sees genre as embodying typified rhetorical action which also has implication for perceived repetition or typification of situation, form, and motive. Rather than considering genre through a set of formal categories, this conception locates genres in social recognitions that are not finite in number nor determinate in form; rather, they change over time, both decaying and proliferating. 
In a 2009 overview of genre research, Karlyn Kohrs Campbell in a handbook chapter on genre included an extensive summary of this article, calling it “groundbreaking.” She wrote, “Miller’s conclusion emphasizes the ways in which social knowledge and language competence teach us how to adopt personae and perform appropriate symbolic acts and to recognize such action in others, which are essential elements in creating and interpreting the discourse that is a part of our daily life as communicators.”Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 2009. Genre. In 21st Century Communication: A Reference Handbook, edited by W. F. Eadie. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1: 262, 263. ISBN:9781412950305 In the introduction to his 1998 collection of landmark essays on contemporary rhetoric, which includes “Genre as Social Action,” Thomas Farrell said this essay “builds upon touchstone research in speech communication as well as compositional studies and philosophy of language. This essay works from one of the most wide-ranging bases of literature available to the field. Yet the result is a meticulously developed argument that gives new force to ‘genre’ as a governing term in rhetorical theory.”Farrell, Thomas B., ed. 1998. Landmark Essays on Contemporary Rhetoric. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. xx. ISBN 978-1880393109 Aviva Freedman in 1999 said that Miller's article "launched a new field of inquiry, most aptly named rhetorical genre studies (RGS). Her reconceptualization of genre did more than illuminate a heretofore neglected area of composition studies; it cast a new light on all the central issues of writing theory and pedagogy.” Freedman, Aviva. 1999. "Beyond the Text: Towards Understanding the Teaching and Learning of Genres." TESOL Quarterly 33 (4): 764. doi: 10.2307/3587890. She has written a series of other articles that have continued the study of genre, including “Rhetorical community: the cultural basis of genre”Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre. Genre and the New Rhetoric. Ed. Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway. London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 67–78. and “Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the Weblog”Miller, C. & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog, Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. Ed. Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, and Jessica Reyman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries, 2004. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action.html. 
Her 1979 article “A humanistic rationale for technical writing” won the National Council of Teachers of English Award for the Best Article in the Philosophy or Theory of Technical and Scientific Communication, 1975-1980 and is listed as an essential work in Technical Communication. It has been reprinted three times,Jones, D. (Ed.) (1996). Defining Technical Communication. Arlington, VA: Society for Technical Communication, pp. 113–118. ISBN 0914548921Selber, S. & Johnson-Eilola, J. (Eds.) (2004). Central Works in Technical Communication. Oxford University Press. pp. 47–54. ISBN 978-0195157055Dubinsky, J. M. (Ed.) (2004). Teaching Technical Communication. Bedford/St. Martin’s. pp. 15–23. ISBN 978-0312412043and is the subject of an article analyzing its influenceSmith, E. O. (1997). Intertextual Connections to 'A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing'. Journal of Business & Technical Communication 11 (2): 192–222. which identifies it as the most cited article in technical communication and the fourth most cited article in the history of the journal College English. Miller's article argues for a rhetorical approach to scientific and technical discourses that acknowledges their basis in communal goals, values, and conventions. Rather than accepting positivist understandings of science, which assume unproblematic relations between language and the external world, scholars and teachers of technical and scientific writing should seek to understand the basis of persuasive appeals for the relevant audiences of such discourse.
Miller’s other research has explored how concepts from the rhetorical tradition, such as topical invention, kairos or timing, and ethos or character, can interpret contemporary scientific, technical, and digitally-mediated discourse.
Category:American people
Category:American professors
Category;1945 births