Green Task Force Survey Summary Report

Back to Sustainable Practices Homepage
=Summary Report Published on the AIC Website=
The information below is copied from the Green Task Force Survey Summary Report.
Presented at the Issue Session of AIC's 37th Annual Meeting by Patricia Silence, Chair
May 21, 2009, Los Angeles, CA
==Introduction==
There is no denying that a measure of sustainability must now be incorporated into our conservation endeavors. Given financial and time pressures, habit, and evolving opinions regarding tolerable conditions for collections, conservators must consider not only the interaction of materials and environment to the art and artifacts we treat, but also the production, use, and disposal of materials employed in our work. We must educate ourselves and become aware of our contribution to pollution and waste, and implement more sustainable practices.
In August 2008 AIC established the Green Task Force to evaluate US conservators’ current awareness of sustainability and how we are working towards more appropriate practices in museums and private businesses. We also aim to evaluate what you and the institutions you are associated with can and should do towards the worldwide goal of environmental sustainability. 
Our charge is to “investigate implementing Green practices for the AIC parent organization and encourage Green practices for the conservation profession”. We have two years to complete this study. Our team consists of conservators and one scientist, working in government and private institutions, as well as in private practice. Most of the conservation specialties recognized in the US are represented in this group. You can find a list of who we are on our Task Force web page.
The information that follows is derived from our first step: a survey sent out to the membership via Survey Monkey. The goal of the survey was to evaluate US conservator’s current awareness of this topic through 24 questions. Submissions were completed in November of 2008. 548 members started the survey, and 475 completed it, out of a total membership of over 3500. Some generalizations from this survey are reported here.
==Who Responded?==
* Over 75% of those who participated are staff conservators
* Almost 13% are interns or fellows
* Just under 10% are administrators, with a few curators and registrars thrown in for good measure
These individuals work in government agencies, historic sites, and academia. Most respondents indicated that they worked in museums, though many worked in private studios (the 2nd largest group) as well as libraries (the 3rd largest group). All specialty groups were represented, with the majority of respondents from book and paper or objects.
Geographically, AIC members are found all over the world, primarily in the US, with a heavy concentration in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions of the United States. Respondents to the survey reflected this. Given that our members are so widely scattered, we must consider that a wide range of government support/ encouragement/ discouragement, as well as access to services, are factors in how people approach and are able to implement “going green.”
==Level of Green Commitment==
* We found that over 50% of our respondents are very committed to adopting greener practices.
* About 25% described their workplace as very committed
* Over 50% described their workplace as somewhat committed
* 20% described their workplace as “not very” or “not” committed
==Current Green Practices==
We asked if respondents’ workplaces have incorporated or considered incorporating green practices. The big winner in this category was recycling – over 87% participate in this activity, including active redistribution of equipment and supplies within and outside their institutions. This is somewhat cost driven, as waste reduction and saving money go hand in hand.
After recycling, institutions have taken measures to reduce energy consumption. Rising fuel costs inspired much of this activity and continuing economic pressures give many facilities more than one good reason to reduce energy consumption. We asked about lighting, and found that over 55% of conservator’s workplaces still use incandescent lighting. Compact fluorescent and T8 tube fluorescents are on the rise in use, as are LEDs in exhibit situations.
==Examples of Wasteful or Environmentally Damaging Practices==
We asked our members if they feel that certain aspects of their employment are wasteful or potentially environmentally damaging. Over 60% responded, ‘yes’. Of these, 87% gave examples. Concerns, in order of frequency (highest to lowest) were: 
* Solvent, chemical and or hazardous materials use and disposal.
* Material waste, including wood, paper, plastic and foam products.
* Waste resulting from exhibition and transit of objects, such as one time use of exhibit furniture or crates.
* Paper consumption for office use and documentation.
* Energy consumption related to maintaining environmental controls – HVAC in particular.
* Use of less efficient or outmoded lights, and electrical or plumbing equipment.
* Water consumption and related waste particularly associated with paper or textile conservation treatments and water purification systems.
* Travel and transportation related to seeing clients and movement of collection materials for exhibition purposes.
* Inadequate or no recycling facilities. Some questioned whether materials were actually getting recycled
==Examples of “Greener” Products==
We asked if our members had found products that are “greener” than those typically used in conservation. While the yes responses were few (14%), they do cross over into multiple categories, and make a good start for our next phase: recommending “best practices”. Some of these products were described as follows:
* water based systems, or natural products
* less toxic solvents or paints
* recycled or re-purposed products, equipment, furniture and tools
* less toxic packing material
* lighting: better bulbs, utilizing natural light, or bouncing light for more impact
* organic cotton rags and towels
* pest management systems that rely on less chemical use
==Personal Steps Taken to Reduce Waste and Environmental Impact==
The survey asked if these conservators had developed procedures that reduce use, emissions or waste, and included other questions in our survey particular to re-use and recycling of materials. It is clear that many of the steps taken toward improved sustainability are personal impact steps (such as composting food scraps) that are carried over to the workplace. Descriptions of the following practices were received:
* Evaluation of environmental impact, and only perform treatments if necessary
* Reduction of power use, by means of more efficient equipment, timers/motion sensors, cutting off “vampire” equipment, modifying or segregating climate controlled areas
* Use of renewable energy such as solar or wind power
* Reduction of water use, or reusing graywater for cleaning brushes, rinses, office plants or outdoor landscaping
* Reduction and sometimes re-distillation of solvents
* Work in renovated buildings or employ environmentally friendly building materials.
* Creating and archiving electronic documents and records
* Reuse of materials, from scrap paper, mat board and blotter, to packing peanuts, Tyvek, and Reemay both within the lab and to share with others. One downside was finding storage for all the scraps
* Using washable materials such as towels or flannel to replace disposable paper towels or blotters, and glass containers to replace plastic
* Driving less and walking or biking when possible
* With regard to particular to AIC practices the only publication that the majority of respondents preferred to get in hard copy is the journal, JAIC
* With regard to Specialty Group publications, it is no surprise that the Book and Paper group still has a majority that prefers hard copies
==Waste & Ventilation==
What about disposal, particularly of hazardous waste? About 75% employ a means of regulated hazmat disposal, either contracting directly with a specialist contract company, including it with their larger facility, or via a community based program. The others let it evaporate, put it in the regular trash, or weren’t sure how to properly dispose of waste.
We find that a small number of respondents use no ventilation system. A large number use multiple sources (HVAC, trunks, fans, etc.). Fume hoods and trunks are the most commonly employed type of ventilation.
==Future work for the AIC Green Task Force==
The AIC Green Task Force needs to know what direction to take. To this end, we asked what barriers are to Going Green. 75% cited their administration or facilities. Cost, habit, and the perception that environmental impact was a necessary evil were all cited, as was lack of time and information. 
It is the latter, of course, information, that we are charged with providing. We will continue our research now that we have some idea of the state of the profession. Those who took the time to participate in our survey offered us many good suggestions, and we find that the issues that members are seeking more information about are consistent with the practices described earlier as “most damaging”. In general, it’s clear that people are interested in:
#minimizing waste (materials and energy)
#less toxic chemical and material alternatives
#re-evaluating the necessity of climate/RH controls
Many see an urgent need for a “best practices” guide for conservators.
We find a fair amount of enthusiasm for workshops and webinars on the topic. The AIC website will be the central location for Green ideas and advice. Reviews of meetings, papers and links will be posted. Questions, comments, and most importantly suggestions regarding sustainability and conservation can be sent to green(at)conservation-us.org.
This report was presented on behalf of AIC at the Going Green Conference held at the British Museum late last month. The fact that we are doing this work was well received. It was reassuring to find that we are not alone in our insecurities that we aren’t doing enough. The GTF is forging connections with conservators throughout the world, as well as colleagues in other professions in order to pull together the best information possible. The AAM Green Professional Interest Committee, which met last on May 1 also welcomes input as they address broader issues that concern museums.
=Summary Report Published in the July 2009 Vol. 34, No. 4 issue of AIC News pg. 12-14=
In August 2008, AIC established the Green Task Force (GTF) to evaluate conservators’ current awareness of sustainability and how we are working
towards more appropriate practices in
museums and private businesses. The
GTF also aims to evaluate what you
and the institutions you are associated
with can and should do towards
the worldwide goal of environmental
sustainability.
Our charge is to “investigate
implementing Green practices for the
AIC parent organization and encourage
Green practices for the conservation
profession.” We have two years to
complete this study. Our team consists
of conservators and one scientist,
working in government and private
institutions, as well as in private practice.
Most of the conservation specialties
recognized in the U.S. are represented
in this group.
Last fall, a survey was sent out
to the membership in order to evaluate
U.S. conservator’s awareness of
this topic through 24 questions. 548
members started the survey, and 475
completed it, out of a total membership
of over 3500. Some generalizations
from the survey are reported
here; the full survey report can be
found on the AIC website.
Over 75% of those who participated
are staff conservators, almost 13%
interns or fellows, and just under 10%
administrators, with a few curators
and registrars. Respondents reported
that they work in government agencies,
historic sites, and academia.
Most respondents indicated that they
worked in museums, though many
worked in private studios (the 2nd
largest group) as well as libraries (the
3rd largest group). All specialty groups
were represented, with the majority
of respondents from book and paper
or objects. Geographically, response
to this survey mirrored membership in 
Over 50% of respondents are
very committed to adopting greener
practices. About 25% described their
workplace as very committed, over
50% as somewhat committed and 20%
as ”not very” or “not” committed.
When asked if respondents’ workplaces
have incorporated or considered
incorporating green practices, the largest
category was recycling – over 87%
participate in this activity, including
active redistribution of equipment and
supplies within and outside their institutions.
Members were asked if they feel
that certain aspects of their employment
are wasteful or potentially
environmentally damaging. Over
60% responded, “yes.” Of these, 87%
gave examples. Concerns, in order of
frequency (highest to lowest) were:
* Chemical and or hazardous materials use and disposal
* Material waste, including wood, paper, and plastic products
* Waste resulting from exhibition and
transit of objects, such as one time use of exhibit furniture or crates
•	 Paper consumption for office use
and documentation
•	 Energy consumption related
to maintaining environmental
controls. Use of less efficient or
outmoded lights, and electrical or
plumbing equipment
•	 Use of less efficient or outmoded
lights, and electrical or plumbing
equipment
•	 Water consumption and related
waste particularly associated with
paper or textile conservation
treatments and water purification
systems
•	 Travel and transportation related to
seeing clients and shipping collections
•	 Inadequate or no recycling facilities
When asked if members had found products that are “greener” than those typically used in conservation, responses fall into the following categories.
•	 water based systems, or natural
products
•	 less toxic solvents or paints
•	 recycled or re-purposed products,
equipment, furniture and tools
•	 less toxic packing material
•	 lighting: better bulbs, utilizing
natural light, or bouncing light for
more impact
•	 organic cotton rags and towels
•	 pest management systems that rely
on less chemical use
Survey results clearly indicated that many of the steps taken toward improved sustainability are personal impact steps (such as composting food
scraps) and some are carried over to
the workplace. We received descriptions
of the following practices:
•	 Evaluation of environmental impact,
and only performing treatments
if necessary
•	 Reduction of power use, such as
use of more efficient equipment,
timers/motion sensors, modifying
or segregating climate controlled
areas
•	 Use of renewable energy such as
solar or wind power
•	 Efficient water use, or reusing graywater
for cleaning brushes, rinses,
office plants or outdoor landscaping.
•	 Reduction or re-distillation of solvents
•	 Work in renovated buildings or employ environmentally friendly building materials
•	 Creating and archiving electronic documents and records
* The only AIC publication that the majority of respondents preferred to get in hard copy is JAIC
* Reuse of materials, from scrap paper, mat board and blotter, to packing peanuts, Tyvek, and Reemay both within the lab and to share with others. One challenge is finding storage for all the scraps
* Use of washable materials such as cloth to replace disposable paper towels or blotters, and glass containers to replace plastic
* And of course, driving less and walking or biking when possible
For hazardous waste disposal, about 75% employ a means of regulated hazmat disposal, by contracting directly with a specialist contract company, including it with their larger facility, or via a community based program. Others let solvents evaporate, put waste in the regular trash, or weren’t sure how to properly dispose of waste.
Air quality concerns within the laboratory vary considerably. Some respondents use no ventilation system. A large number use multiple sources (HVAC, trunks, fans, etc.). Fume hoods and trunks are the most commonly employed type of ventilation.
For the future, the AIC Green Task Force needs to know what direction to take. We asked what barriers there are to “Going Green.” 75% cited their administration or facilities. Cost, habit, and the perception that environmental impact was a necessary evil were all cited, as was lack of time and information.
Those who took the time to participate in our survey offered us many good suggestions for future research. In general, it’s clear that AIC members are interested in minimizing waste (materials and energy), using less toxic chemical and material alternatives, and re-evaluating the necessity of climate/RH controls. There is a fair amount of enthusiasm for workshops and webinars on the topic. Many see an urgent need for a “best practices” guide for conservators.
The AIC website is the central location for “Green” ideas and advice. www.conservation-us.org/green [link no longer active] has reviews of meetings, links and papers including a more detailed report on this survey. Send questions and comments to [email removed].
This report was presented on behalf of AIC at the Going Green Conference held at the British Museum in late April, and at the AIC Annual Meeting in May. The GTF is forging connections with conservators throughout the world, as well as colleagues in other professions in order to pull together and disseminate the best information possible.
—Patricia Silence,
Green Task Force Chair