Controversies in the Internatia Song Contest

During its history, the Internatia Song Contest has been a subject of various scandals and controversies. 
==Countries not qualifying by mistake==
There were numerous occasions of countries not qualifying by mistake and the ISC players not noticing it until the final results are published, whether that was due to another country's votes counted wrong, a country's set of votes miscounted or the host accidentally counting their votes as a separate juror and not an International Jury voter. This is the list of all such occasions:
* 17 - lost their final ticket to because of 's 12 accidentally being added to themselves and not .
* 23 - lost their final ticket to because of 's 6 points for were not counted in the Excel spreadsheet.
* 32 - lost their final ticket to because of 's Semifinal 1 IJ vote counted both as an IJ vote and as a regular vote and 's IJ vote counting as a regular vote instead.
* 44 - lost their final ticket to because of 's 12 accidentally being added to themselves and not .
* 67 - lost their final ticket to because of 's 8 accidentally being counted to instead of . If this was fixed then, would've been moved from IJ qualification to a regular one, thus throwing out from the regular qualification zone and making the IJ qualifier instead.
* 70 - lost their final ticket to because of 's IJ votes not being counted, despite being sent in one message to the host.
* 144 - lost their final ticket to because the 12th place tiebreaker wasn't solved by the number of voters, but rather the amount of 12s etc. points they had.
There were also cases of those things occuring but fixed right before the final:
*ISC 20 - the actual qualifiers were and , but due to the host counting IJ as a separate voter (like it used to be a rule before additional IJ qualification was made as a rule instead), the qualifiers were announced to be and . Both came from two different semifinals.
*ISC 37 - the actual qualifiers were and , but due to the host counting IJ as a separate voter, the qualifiers were announced to be and . Both came from the same semifinal.
*ISC 63 - the actual qualifier was , but due to the host making an unspecified mistake, the qualifier was announced to be . The ISC community then had a short voting time to decide whether to let join the final as the 28th qualifier or not. The majority voted against it, and therefore the number of finalists was kept as it is.
*ISC 109 - the actual qualifier was , but due to the host's Excel having added an unnecessary amount of points to all the countries, the qualifier was announced to be . Upon opening the final, the host opted to keep 28 countries in the final despite some people wishing the host to remove false qualifier, but the false qualifier chose to rightfully withdraw from the final because of them knowing they'd be an undeserved qualifier otherwise. Therefore, a 27 song final remained the status quo.
*ISC 115 - the actual qualifiers were and , but due to an Excel mistake of the queries pointing at the header and not the second row, causing the last country alphabetically of each semi go missing from it, the qualifiers were announced to be and . Both came from two different semifinals.
==Notable dramas with their own paragraphs==
===The host's disappearance===
During the final of ISC 10, everything went smooth until it was nearing the deadline day, when people have noticed that the host of the edition, Jeremy (owner of at the time), went absent. Many nations' rulers panicked heavily until Shawn, the owner of , stepped in and offered to finish everything as it is by letting everyone send their votes to him and determine the eventual ISC 10 winner eventually. Everything was resolved in the end that way up until one time, about 2 years later, when a user named Karhu showed up and confessed that he was Jeremy, and posted all the ISC 10 scoreboards, including the ones for the final. Since then the official ISC 10 results have been those that Karhu posted, and the ones presented in were the official ones for the 2 years period of "Jeremy's" absence.
===Not voting for a song one hyped===
During ISC 20 semifinal results show did not qualify, but ended up being close to it. Sometime after that, 's owner posted their non-qualifier votes and then the owner of , all bittersweet over their NQ, called out on not voting them despite having hyped the song numerous times and even having included their entry in their previous NFs. accused of doing a similar thing to them for the ISC 28 final.
===Votes sent to a wrong account===
In the middle of the ISC 57 final, the owner of , Browneyed, took off for holidays and appointed another account (Kimmy of ) to collect the final votes for him. He ended up presenting the results as normal until 4 nations (, , and ) came forefront to reveal that they have voted, but sent votes to Browneyed instead of Kimmy. Since then, a debate occured of whether there's a need to count all of their votes and include them as part of the actual results or not. The majority have voted on the official poll regarding this thing that the ISC 57 results should remain as Kimmy presented them, without all 4 of those nations involved getting a strike.
Though it adds absolutely nothing to the story, at some point during it all it was hinted that most likely hadn't sent any votes to any host at all, but had them ready regardless.
===Late vote acceptance costing a victory===
The host nation of ISC 59, , had informed that the deadlines for voting in the edition would be fairly strict. However, at the end of the ISC 59 final voting, the host nation allowed some countries to vote late afterall. After the results show of the edition, the owner of went out to investigate whether the late votes have changed anything based on curiousity, and it have turned out that without the votes of late voters being accepted, would have indeed won the edition, and the initial winner nation would have finished 3rd instead. This was made more suspicious when some of the voters for 's song said that they couldn't get their votes in. In order to make justice, it was agreed that would join as an automatic qualifier for the ISC 61.
===Blatant recap-voting===
At the beginning of ISC 65, the host nation publicly announced that voted strangely too early than the time for all the songs to be listened to would have taken. Deciding that he wanted to find out why, the host nation's owner Lonter simply asked 's owner PamSwynford about it, and she revealed that it was indeed because of her recap-voting, which is one of the worst ways of listening to the songs of a contest and basing your votes on, and that makes player out as a lazy person who can't even bother to listen to full songs and the ISC players would suffer from it without knowing if they'd have received some points had their song been listened to in full and loved that way. The host got outraged about it and publicly shamed 's owner for committing such action, as well as ISC players coming in on to mock the situation and the way PamSwynford answered the fatal question by ending her answer with "Problem?", which sounded a bit naively rude in tone. And even when PamSwynford slightly changed the votes, they weren't accepted and was disqualified from the edition, allowing absolutely no one to vote for their entry, which was "Shine" by Years & Years. Despite this, the entry remains being used in ISC, and cannot be sent to any future editions.
===Confession of not even listening to full songs===
During the JISC 33 show, the host nation revealed that one of the Waiting List members, , has been withdrawn. Later it was revealed that the owner of said country outright told the hosts of JISC 33 that they didn't even listen to full songs, only the snippets of them. With it following almost soon after the ISC 65 scandal, the reasons of the removal were kept quiet about until a group of concerned ISC/OSC players were begging to know the details. As a result the owner of , Serduchka, has been permanently removed from the Waiting List.
A similar case happened during the OSC 63 semis in which was disqualified (reducing their entry to a nul pointer) for voting strangely too early. This time, it was revealed that the owner of Polland confessed that he also did listen to snippets. As a result, the OSC mods have decided that would receive a strike and be banned from participating in OSC 63 and OSC 64 - which was supposed to host - but for some reason their hosting rights had to remain. In the end of it all, 's rights of participation in OSC 64 were somewhat reinstated, and the country was allowed to reuse their OSC 63 entry as their host entry for OSC 64.
===Triple account gate===
On the final day of ISC 85 voting, the moderator and the owner of , Nicolas, announced publicly that , and are banned from ISC and the forum itself due to the fact that the owner of has in fact controlled 's and 's owners' accounts, thus confirming the public suspicion that arose years ago about the possibility of the whole "Alteus clan" being just TheMooCows making different accounts with similar tastes just to vote for himself. It was being debated whether to do something about all the results all those 3 countries contributed to in ISC (including victories of their own) or leave the history as it is, but eventually it was decided that the history stays as it is.
Many ISC players were all up and arms about detecting on similar cases regarding the fact that some new Waiting List members are usually completely new people with their first post immediately being all about wanting to join the Waiting List, particularly members from the real life country Finland (while in reality they probably all come from the same Eurovision fan forum that has possibly collapsed by now). Same about a few of people that are like that joining all at once. But outside of the recent triple account gate, nothing similar has happened before besides the time in ISC 2 where suspicions about Vanessa 99 (owner of at the time) and Frank (owner of ) came about them being the same account due to them keeping on exchanging high points in a lot of ESCForum contest they've been to together a short period of time. The whole thing has been revealed as rather that both accounts were two different people, but both possibly being used on one computer, thus sharing the same IP, which in forum is pretty much illegal. Since then, took one edition off and Vanessa 99 kept participating up until her disappearance at the beginning of ISC 40 results show that she had to present as the host of that edition. Afterwards, 's owner Bryon finished off the result show and Frank came back (with a new account this time) to take over after Vanessa 99 somehow left the forum to continue on with everything. In the end it seems that many people have forgiven both of the people involved in that old case.
===Accusations of "stolen" hosting===
After ISC 133 ended, 's owner NancyAura went to privately ask 's owner Robbyg112 about if the latter country will host ISC 135, as they won the edition. Sometime later, NancyAura pitched an idea of double hosting (similar to how ISC 29 was hosted by and , and ISC 90 by and , the other host getting to host one semifinal and the remaining two shows go to the main host), with a theme planned out, and Robbyg112 ended up handing the hosting to NancyAura in the end. NancyAura then went to announce the news on the forum, making some of the roster members very suspicious and accusing NancyAura of being desperate to host, outright stealing the hosting, and pressuring Robbyg112 into giving up hosting, considering Robbyg112 released a statement about it where he stated that he had to make a "hard decision" and that it "was hard to say no" to NancyAura offering up. Robbyg112 also mentioned that he himself decided to not host due to lack of skills to do a good job, to which others responded that they could offer some help at hosting, because no country is pressured to host ISC with pimped out graphics and such - they could do everything simplistically instead. Later, Robbyg112 wrote to ISC Discord to ask to stop the drama and that he's fine with hosting as they came second, so naturally, they were the second in succession of hosting. Should the winner decline to do host an edition, the person that came second takes up the job; if they decline, the rights go to the third place, then to fourth, and so on until the suitable host comes up.
==Miscellaneous (smaller dramas)==
There's been various other smaller and less relevant drama occuring over the years of ISC that included:
*Various countries allowing themselves to send the same artist on the same edition: Shakira in ISC 6 ( and ), Avicii in ISC 13 ( and ), Yao Beina/Bella Yao in ISC 32 ( and ), Lisa Hannigan in ISC 35 ( and ), Anne-Marie in ISC 55 ( and ), RAYE in ISC 56 ( and ), Miley Cyrus/Ashley O in ISC 85 ( and ).
*Pointwhoring (sending a well-placing contest song a person doesn't like, or sending a well-placing contest song in general, in the sole purpose of just gaining votes) accusations (e.g.: 53 not even being liked by the country's owner apparently and them not giving points to it in OSC 23 when it came 2nd on there for ).
* failing to vote in their ISC 13 semifinal and losing not only their qualification, but also the 1st place in their semi. Similar occasions happened to in ISC 26 and in ISC 61.
*'s late votes for their ISC 19 semi being accepted and thus reportedly costing and even a qualification.
*'s owner's meltdown over sending Adelén and them coming 2nd with her in ISC 24.
* accusing of stealing their ISC 31 entry for ISC 30, and after that one ended up winning, they sent the song with the exact same lyrics to ISC 32 (which hosted) that could almost count as an ineligible entry for the fact that it's the song from the same universe, although it was a song made by a fan of the Hunger Games franchise after its lyrics were supposedly put in one of the books.
*'s owner Gianluca being permanently banned in the middle of the ISC 41 semifinal period for making less than acceptable comments. He was previously accused of biased voting and voting the Kosmallán clan over everything else (which has been toned down in order to not be accused of bias again).
*'s owner ragequitting at the end of ISC 49 final voting period and only posting an Excel file of the results, due to all the personal negativity.
*'s owner accidentally spoiling the winner of ISC 51 before the last scoreboard was presented, after having been responsible for the scoreboards of the evening. Also for taking a break to "clean the floor", which has become a meme on the ISC community.
* complaining that they did not win ISC 56 solely because only gave them 8 points.
*The sluggish speeds of hosting ISC 112 and presenting the final results, for which multiple people expressed impatience.
* getting away with sending a past edition song in its original version for ISC 142 - "Stanga" by Sagi Abitbul & Guy Haliva was already performed as "Logia omorfa (Stanga)" by Yianna Terzi in ISC 91 for . The host of ISC 142, , almost disqualified the song during the edition until it was pointed out that ISC 85 allowed both Miley Cyrus and her Black Mirror series character Ashley O to compete alongside one another in one edition. "Stanga" qualified and placed 11th in the final, the same final placing that was achieved by the version that was sent prior. Curiously, this entry was submitted after 's original choice was rejected upon the opening of the ISC 142 semifinals ("Utopia" by Bang La Decks, 76), therefore, they would've needed to submit a 3rd song if "Stanga" blunder was caught earlier.
**Similar case happened in ISC 151 when sent "Being Nobody" by Liberty X; a mashup cover that sings the song "Ain't Nobody" on a different instrumental, which was already sent as "Ain't Nobody" by Daniel & Natasha Bendingfield by to ISC 16 which was hosted by 's current owner back when he played as . However, this passed by without much fanfare, and didn't qualify to ISC 151 final.