nyuuzyou/wikis huggingface dataset:
Lists of creationist scientists/P

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Pallaghy, Charles
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|Botanist.
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Parker, Gary E.
|AIG, CMI, ICR
|Biology
|B.A., Biology/Chemistry, Wabash College. M.S., Biology/Physiology, Ball State University. Ed.D. in Biology with a cognate in Paleontology from Ball State University. Adjunct Faculty for the Institute for Creation Research.https://answersingenesis.org/bios/gary-parker/http://web.archive.org/web/20020601213333/http://www.icr.org/creationscientists/biologicalscientists.html#gparker
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Pennington, David
|AIG, Ex-CMI
|Medicine
|Plastic Surgeon. A doctor of medicine, not related to evolution or a young earth. Removed from the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Phillips, David
|ICR
|Biology
|B.A., Physical Anthropology with minors in Biology and Geology, California State University of Northridge (CSUN). M.A., Paleoanthropology, California State University of Northridge.http://web.archive.org/web/20020810185627/http://www.icr.org/creationscientists/physicalscientists.html#dphillips
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Phipps, Terry L.
|CMI
|Biology
|Ph.D., Environmental Biology, The Ohio State University. M.S., Biological Science, Wright State University. B.S., Biology, Cedarville College.www.cedarville.edu/personal/personalpages/tlp_www.htm
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Piercy, Mathew
|Ex-CMI
|Medicine
|Anaesthetist. A doctor of medicine, not related to evolution or a young earth. Removed from the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Poirier, Jules H.
|CMI
|Engineering
|Aeronautics, Electronics. A doctor of engineering, not related to evolution or a young earth.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Porter, Richard
|AIG, Ex-CMI
|Medicine
|World authority on the human spine. A doctor of medicine, not related to evolution or a young earth. Removed from the CMI list as of 2010-06-08.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Purdom, Georgia
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|Ph.D., Molecular genetics, The Ohio State University. Employee of Answers in Genesis.https://answersingenesis.org/bios/georgia-purdom/
|
|
|Yes
|}
Lists of creationist scientists/Q

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Quick, Graeme
|CMI
|Engineering
|Formerly Principle Research Scientist with CSIRO. A doctor of engineering, not related to evolution or a young earth. Added to the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|}
Lists of creationist scientists/R

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Rankin, John
|AIG, Ex-CMI
|Physics
|B.S. (Hons), Applied mathematics, Monash University. Ph.D., Mathematical Physics, University of Adelaide.https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/john-r-rankin-mathematical-physics/ "When we ask about the origins of everything, what are the choices? We basically really only have two choices: evolution or creation."https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/john-r-rankin-mathematical-physics/ Removed from the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Raske, Arthur
|AIG
|Biology
|Entomology.
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Reese, A.S.
|AIG, Ex-CMI
|Medicine
|M.D. A doctor of medicine, not related to evolution or a young earth. Removed from the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Rendle-Short, John
|AIG, Ex-CMI
|Medicine
|Pediatrician (AM, MA, MB, BChir, MD (Cantab.), FRCP, FRACP.)https://answersingenesis.org/bios/john-rendle-short/http://creation.com/professor-john-rendle-short A doctor of medicine, not related to evolution or a young earth. Removed from the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Reynolds, Daniel W.
|ICR
|Chemistry
|B.S. Chemistry, University of Texas. M.A. Synthetic Organic Chemistry, University of Texas. Ph.D. Physical Organic Chemistry, University of Texas.http://web.archive.org/web/20020810185627/http://www.icr.org/creationscientists/reynolds.html
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Rodda, David
|CMI
|Biology
|Ph.D., Population Genetics.
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Roe, Jung-Goo
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Rosevear, David
|AIG, CMI
|Chemistry
| Added to the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Ross, Marcus
|CMI
|Biology
|Paleontology. Added to the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Roth, Ariel A.
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|B.A., Biology, Pacific Union College. M.S., Biology, University of Michigan. Ph.D., Biology, University of Michigan. Editor for 23 years of Origins journal of the Geoscience Research Institute. "When I consider the great questions of origins from a broad perspective, the biblical model makes the most sense to me; it leaves fewer unanswered questions. [....] The presence of complexity—interdependent parts that do not function unless other parts are also present—poses another major problem for evolution."https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/ariel-a-roth-biology/
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Russell, Craig
|CMI
|Biology
|Soil science, plant nutrition, ecology. Added to the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|Yes
|}
Lists of creationist scientists/V

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Vardiman, Larry
|AIG, CMI, ICR
|Earth Science
|B.S. Physics, University of Missouri at Rolla. B.S. Meteorology, St. Louis University. M.S. Atmospheric Science, Colorado University. Ph.D. Atomospheric Science, Colorado University. Chairman of the Astro/Geophsics Department and Professor of Physics at the Institute for Creation Research.http://web.archive.org/web/20020622074301/http://www.icr.org/creationscientists/vardiman.html "Evolution implies chaos and meaninglessness. Creation implies order and value."https://answersingenesis.org/answers/books/in-six-days/larry-vardiman-meteorology/ A doctor of atmospheric science, not related to evolution or a young earth.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Veith, Walter
|AIG, CMI, ICR
|Biology
|Zoologist. Patently doesn't understand evolution. See main page.
|
|YEC
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Vetter, Joachim
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Vinay, Stephen J. (III)
|AIG
|Chemistry
|Chemical Engineering.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Vorpagel, Erich
|CMI
|Chemistry
|Biochemistry, Molecular Biology; computational protein function. Added to the CMI list as of the 29 October 2014 version.
|
|
|Yes
|}
Lists of creationist scientists/Y

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Yang, Seoung-Hoon
|AIG, CMI
|Physics
|
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Yi, Thomas (Tong Y.)
|AIG, CMI
|Engineering
|Ph.D., Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering. A doctor of engineering, not related to evolution or a young earth.
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Yoo, Ick-Dong
|CMI
|Biology
|Genetics.
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Yoon, Sung-Hee
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Young, Patrick
|AIG, CMI, ICR
|Chemistry
|B.S., Chemistry, University of Rio Grande. Ph.D., Analytical Chemistry (Minors in Organic and Physical Chemistry), Ohio University.http://web.archive.org/web/20021231113343/http://www.icr.org/creationscientists/young.html
|
|
|No (Field)
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Yu, Keun Bae
|AIG, CMI
|Earth Science
|B.A., Geography, Seoul National University, 1977. M.A., Geography, Seoul National University, 1981. Ph.D., Geography, University of Georgia, 1986.http://www.geog.snu.ac.kr/contents/bbs/bbs_content.html?bbs_cls_cd=003002001&cid=15021520402151
|
|
|Yes
|-style="background:#FFCCCC;"
|Yuan, Daiqing
|CMI
|Physics
|Theoretical Physics. After obtaining his Ph.D. in 1996, Dr. Yuan has since been a missionary, switched to studying theology, and is currently a pastor. His Ph.D. cannot be disputed but he's hardly what one would describe as a working scientist.http://www.reporternews.com/news/2009/aug/20/from-china-with-reverence-beijing-born-pastor-of/
|1996 ( YA)https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=Daiqing+Yuan&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C21
|
|No (Field)
|}
Lists of creationist scientists/Z

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-style="background:#D4F7D4;"
|Zuill, Henry
|AIG, CMI
|Biology
|Professor emeritus at Union College (Nebraska), a Seventh Day Adventist college whose science and mathematical division states, among other things, that this division "…concentrates on helping students to know God as the Creator while providing plenty of practical experience.http://www.ucollege.edu/science-and-mathematics A decidedly unscientific goal. "If biodiversity is as necessary for normal ecosystem operation as appears to be the case, it suggests that these services, and organisms providing them, had to have been simultaneously present right from the beginning. If these ecological interrelationships are really indispensable, then there is no easy evolutionary explanation. This suggests that ecology was designed."https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/henry-zuill-biology/
|
|
|Yes
|}
==References==
Littlewood's law

Littlewood's law (or Littlewood's law of miracles) is a mathematical conjecture by J E Littlewood - MacTutor of Cambridge University that relates to the frequency of a "miracle" occurring. It argues that events viewed as miraculous are actually commonplace if considered in the context of how much occurs in a person's life. 
Physicist and mathematician Freeman Dyson explains it in his review of the book Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, Other Pseudoscience:The Scientist as Rebel: A New York Review Collection by Freeman Dyson (2008) Random House. ISBN 1590172949.
Mathematically this is dependent on the arbitrary definition of "discrete events" and the arbitrary assignment of a probability for a miracle — although "one in a million" is a common sense estimate for something spectacularly unlikely. So, this is a heuristic, or rule-of-thumb approach. Furthermore, if one calculates the actual probability, it is approximately 0.632, meaning that there is 63.2% chance that some miracle(s) occurs, not close to 100%.
Of course, altering these arbitrary factors alters the frequency of a "miracle" happening. But that isn't really the point. The purpose of the law is to show if you define a miracle as any unlikely event, then miracles are bound to happen frequently, just by chance. To claim a genuine "hit" you have to define your expected event in advance.
==See also==
*Borel's Law
*Improbable things happen
==Notes==
==References==
Category:Eponymous laws
Category:Logic
Category:Mathematics
Category:Skepticism
Category:Statistics
Livingwhole.org

Livingwhole.org is yet another health and wellness website that falls in the alternative medicine camp. 
The site's mission, however, is more in line with functional and integrative wellness practices (i.e., aromatherapy, massage, and nutrition), which are becoming increasingly accepted as complementary treatments by health institutes like the Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic.
Prior to 2021 the website included anti-vaccination information that has since been removed. This domain has new management with all new woo content, but at least they accept science and that vaccines are a safe way to protect against certain diseases and illness.
Some of the older material, that has since been taken down, included genius medical advice as this:https://web.archive.org/web/20141005203943/http://www.livingwhole.org/dear-parents-are-you-being-lied-to/
On average 41,400 people died each year in the United States between 1979 and 2001 from influenza.
==External links==
*The webshite in question (archived).
*And never forget, active contempt for those they harm
* https://respectfulinsolence.com/tag/livingwhole-org/
* https://sci-techmaven.io/ascienceenthusiast/science/vaccines-don-t-work-an-infographic-debunked--tjemDnYS0K21HElE1dFGg
==References==
Category:Anti-vaccination movement
Category:Websites
Local Church

The Local Church is a Christian movement following the teachings of Chinese evangelists Watchman Nee and Witness Lee. Usually considered a restorationist movement, they shun denominational titles and believe that all Christians in each given city belong to "the Church" in that city, following the New Testament model. The movement became popular as an underground movement in Communist China, where Watchman Nee was imprisoned by the government from 1952-1972. Their affiliated publishing house Living Stream Ministry publishes the English-language Recovery Version of the Bible, which they give out for free. However, there are some evangelical Christians who consider the Local Church movement a cult, or at best slightly heretical. The Local Church sued John Ankerberg for including them in a book about cults and heresies, while Hank Hanegraaff on the other hand considers the Local Church movement to be within the bounds of orthodox Christian belief and not heretical.
==External Links==
*Website about Witness Lee's Work
*Website about Watchman Nee's Work
Category:Christian denominations
Category:Christianity
Category:China
Log Cabin Republicans

The Log Cabin Republicans is an association for gay members of the United States Republican Party. Its membership unites LGBT individuals who place a higher priority on defense or economic issues than in gaining equal rights as members of a minority group, or as they would put it, "overturning the traditional definition of marriage".
The name is a reference to Abraham Lincoln, not to the personal "logs" or "cabins" of its members, or who they use them with. They claim their name because Lincoln founded the Republican Party with ideas of liberty and equality in mind. Although it may be that 
The idea of a gay conservative may seem like an oxymoron, but this assumes that people with a particular shared sexual orientation must necessarily be a monolithic political bloc and that a minority, by default, supports its own demographic. There are certainly gay conservatives that internalize the bigotry directed at them. Others are simply comfortable with their economic position in society and are more concerned with preserving their comfort than helping other members of their demographic (aka "Fuck you, I've got mine").
According to their bylaws, the Log Cabin Republicans will only endorse Republican candidates, regardless of the issues or individuals in any specific political race. They also seem to oppose the outing of hypocritical anti-gay politicians.Here's the page (The CBC's Current with Anna Maria Tremonti).Here's the audio. GOProud, the first gay organization to sponsor CPAC, also gave gay conservatives a voice. GOProud's target audience were those who found the Log Cabin Republicans too moderate (for all-but-endorsing some Democrats anyway when the Republican candidates were utter bigots).
== Don't ask, don't tell ==
To their credit, the Log Cabin Republicans filed a lawsuit against the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy in 2004, during the George W. Bush administration. Their legal challenge to the policy (which only received a trial in July 2010) was successful, however Barack Obama campaigned on repealing the policy anyway.Dan Levine (September 29, 2011). "U.S. court vacates ruling on gays in military. Reuters.(October 19, 2010). "Timeline: Chronology of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy". Reuters.
== See also ==
*Tammy Bruce — An honest-to-God lesbian Republican talk-show host.
*Fred Karger — Who ran in the 2012 Republican presidential primary. 
==References==
Category:Homosexuality
Category:Right-wing activists
Logic and Creation

In the August 1998 issue of Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal (subsequently re-named Journal of Creation -- CMI's pseudoscientific rag, a so-called " peer reviewed science journal"), the famous chess-player Jonathan Sarfati tried his hand at writing a primer on the subject of logic, entitled Loving God with All Your Mind: Logic and Creation.
In keeping with the general observation that creationists cannot tell a proposition from a logical connective, let alone make a cohesive argument, this primer, um, leaves some things wanting.
In this side-by-side, we comment on the article in its entirety.
__TOC__
==Summary==
==Scriptural Considerations==
==Logic in Biblical preaching and witnessing==
==Accurate Definitions of Words==
==Equivocation==
==Truth and Falsity==
==Reasoned Arguments==
===1) Validity===
===2) Soundness===
===3) Contradiction===
===4) Conditional Statements and Implications===
Table 1: Affirming the Antecedent
English 	Symbolic
p implies q 	p⊃q
p is true 	p
therefore q is true 	q
Affirming the Antecedent	Modus ponens
Table 2: Denying the Consequent
English 	Symbolic
p implies q 	p⊃q
q is false 	~q
therefore p is false 	~p
Denying the Consequent	Modus tollens
Table 3: Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent
English 	Symbolic
p implies q 	p⊃q
q is true 	q
therefore p is true	∴ p
Table 4: Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent
English 	Symbolic
p implies q 	p⊃q
p is false 	~p
therefore q is false	∴ ~q
===5) Disjunctive Syllogism===
Table 5: Disjunctive Syllogism
English 	Symbolic
Either p or q 	p v q
p is false 	~p
therefore q is true	∴ q
 
==Other common fallacies==
===Hasty Generalisation===
===Genetic Fallacy===
===Fallacy of Division===
===Fallacy of Composition===
===Post hoc ergo propter hoc===
==The basis for logic==
==References==
Category:Creationism
Category:Fallacious arguments
Category:Misnomers
Category:Side-by-side articles
Category:Refutations
Logically Fallacious

Logically Fallacious is a website and book written and maintained by Bo Bennett, PHD that catalogues logical fallacies, common in both internet debate and real-life conversation. The site is an online version of his namesake book, which documents over 300 fallacies, complete with worked examples, logical forms and explanations on why they are fallacious. Some, such as Argumentum ad hominem, are relatively well-known (though Dr. Bennett divides it into several distinct fallacies for specificity), though others appear to be more obscure. This is partially due to his criteria for fallacieshttps://www.logicallyfallacious.com/questions/index.html allowing for variations of the same fallacy being given their own section in the book.
The site generally does a good job showing errors in reasoning, though some of the fallacies may be redundant (there are over 300 after all); an example is the 'Alternative Advance'https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Alternative-Advance fallacy, which is effectively a False dilemma with two options that are the same, yet worded differently. Another example is Ad Fidentiahttps://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Ad-Fidentia, which is an Ad Hominem attack on a person's confidence in order to undermine their faith in the arguments presented. The worked examples are often political in nature, which is to be expected, but Dr Bennett uses talking points from across the political spectrum. In non-political examples, he uses arguments from all sides, showing how no one is fully immune to faulty reasoning even if they believe their worldview is rational.
The site has a question-and-answer section where members can ask Dr Bennett and the community whether a specific statement or argument contains a fallacy.
RationalWiki cites it for a number of fallacies.
Dr. Bennett also offers a paid course on critical thinking, located on the same website.
==See also==
*Nizkor Project
*Fallacy Files
*Your Logical Fallacy Is
==External links==
*The website itself
*His profile
Category:Fallacy collections
Category:Fallacies
Category:Logic
==References==
Lolcow

Lolcow ( + "cow") (not to be confused with ), is a derogatory slang term used to describe an eccentric/foolish individual with an internet presence who is deemed highly exploitable and therefore susceptible to online trolling/harassment ("milked for laughs", hence the comparison to a cow), especially due to their gullible display of online behaviour (don't feed the troll). Communities of harassers such as Kiwi Farms often digitally stalk, dox, and discuss lolcow victims at their expense. The harassers are fascinated by the abnormality of their victims' personal lives, including beliefs, sexuality, and/or behaviours. Many "lolcows" are neurodivergent or have extreme social and political views, such as so-called SJW, MRA, or feminist beliefs. Because of this, the communities that are obsessed with "lolcows" tend to be right-wing leaning. Despite this, some (albeit much fewer) notable "lolcows" are right-leaning, such as Ethan Ralph and Nick Rikieta. 
Basically, a fancy word to say "This guy is easy to bully, go get'em!"
==Sites that obsess over lolcows==
*4chan
*8chan
*Kiwi Farms (and their associated wikis)
*Encyclopedia Dramatica
*LOLcow.farm 
*Dead Horse Interchange
==Notes==
==See also==
*Cringe culture
*Cyber-bullying
*Doxing
==External links==
*Urban Dictionary
*Know Your Meme
*An article about "lolcows"
Category:Internet culture
Category:Ableism
London Hammer

The London Hammer is a name given to a hammer made of iron and wood that was found in London, Texas in 1936. Part of the hammer is embedded in a limy rock concretion, leading to it being hailed in some quarters as an anomalous artifact: if an obviously man-made tool is old enough to have been encased in rock, the argument goes, then conventional history is wrong.
The creationist Carl Baugh latched on to the hammer in the eighties, even using it as the basis of speculation of how the atmospheric quality of a pre-flood earth could have encouraged the growth of giants.http://ncse.com/cej/5/1/if-i-had-hammer The hammer is now an exhibit in Baugh's Creation Evidence Museum, which sells replicas of it to visitors.http://www.badarchaeology.com/?page_id=315 Since then, various Internet cranks have used the hammer as evidence of ancient astronauts,http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread579166/pg2 a government conspiracy,http://reinep.wordpress.com/tag/london-hammer/ and Thor (yes, him, sadly).<capture>http://www.englisc-gateway.com/bbs/topic/33970-75-100-million-year-old-thors-hammer/</capture>
Baugh's claims were countered by researcher John Cole, who pointed out that the rock concretion could have been the result of dissolved sediment hardening around the hammer, something which can happen in a relatively short amount of time; Cole also concluded that, judging by its style, the artifact is a 19th century miner's hammer.
In the conclusion to his own debunking of the artifact, paleontologist Glen Kuban agreed with the recent age of the hammer and stressed that unless Baugh or any others could provide evidence that the hammer was once naturally situated in a pre-Quaternary stratum, it would remain a curiosity, not a reliable out-of-place artifact.The London Hammer: An Alleged Out-of-Place Artifact 
==References==
Category:Creationism
Category:Out-of-place artifact
Category:Pseudoarchaeology
Category:Texas