Incidents/2022-04-26 cr2-eqord down

==Summary==
Since the previous evening (April 25), the Telia link from Eqord to Eqiad was down due to a fiber cut. At 05:00 the next morning, a Telia maintenance began that took down our remaining transports from Eqord, to Codfw and Ulsfo. As a result, we were entirely unable to reach the Eqord networking equipment. There was no end-user impact since Eqord is a network-only location with end-user traffic for Codfw and Ulsfo naturally going there directly instead of via Eqord.
cathal@nbgw:~$ ping -c 3 208.115.136.238 PING 208.115.136.238 (208.115.136.238) 56(84) bytes of data. --- 208.115.136.238 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2055ms
Telia circuit failure logs:
 Apr 25 17:32:42 cr2-eqord fpc0 MQSS(0): CHMAC0: Detected Ethernet MAC Remote Fault Delta Event for Port 5 (xe-0/1/5) 
 Apr 26 05:11:57 cr2-eqord fpc0 MQSS(0): CHMAC0: Detected Ethernet MAC Remote Fault Delta Event for Port 3 (xe-0/1/3)
 Apr 26 05:11:57 cr2-eqord fpc0 MQSS(0): CHMAC0: Detected Ethernet MAC Local Fault Delta Event for Port 0 (xe-0/1/0)
 Apr 26 07:15:19 cr2-eqord fpc0 MQSS(0): CHMAC0: Cleared Ethernet MAC Remote Fault Delta Event for Port 3 (xe-0/1/3)
 Apr 26 07:15:47 cr2-eqord fpc0 MQSS(0): CHMAC0: Cleared Ethernet MAC Local Fault Delta Event for Port 0 (xe-0/1/0)
Documentation:
* Network design
* Restricted document
==Actionables==
* Grant Cathal authorization to be able to create remote hands cases (DONE)
== Scorecard==
Incident Engagement™ ScoreCard
 	Question 	Score	Notes
People 	Were the people responding to this incident sufficiently different than the previous five incidents? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	0 	Info not logged
People 	Were the people who responded prepared enough to respond effectively (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	0 	Manually escalated to netops
People 	Were more than 5 people paged? (score 0 for yes, 1 for no) 	0 	
People 	Were pages routed to the correct sub-team(s)? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	0 	
People 	Were pages routed to online (business hours) engineers? (score 1 for yes,  0 if people were paged after business hours) 	0 	
Process 	Was the incident status section actively updated during the incident? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	1 	
Process 	Was the public status page updated? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	0 	
Process 	Is there a phabricator task for the incident? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	0 	
Process 	Are the documented action items assigned?  (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	1 	
Process 	Is this a repeat of an earlier incident (score 0 for yes, 1 for no) 	0 	
Tooling 	Was there, before the incident occurred, open tasks that would prevent this incident / make mitigation easier if implemented? (score 0 for yes, 1 for no)	1 	
Tooling 	Were the people responding able to communicate effectively during the incident with the existing tooling? (score 1 for yes, 0 or no) 	1 	
Tooling 	Did existing monitoring notify the initial responders? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	1 	
Tooling 	Were all engineering tools required available and in service? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	1 	
Tooling 	Was there a runbook for all known issues present? (score 1 for yes, 0 for no) 	1 	
Total score	Total score 	7