When I become dictator, I will ban sex

There are many possible ways to enforce the banning of sex, however this will depend on how much power I, as a dictator, have. Am I an absolute dictator of the world with the ability to annihilate any city if I feel like it, with no threat of myself being overthrown? Or am I the leader of some small corner of the world that needs to satisfy many of my backers' desires rather than solely my own? I will assume the first case.
Then, what I mean by "sex" is also to be considered. Do I mean two people doing the sex with each other? Does this include masturbation? Do I mean the end goal of reproduction, and not necessarily the process involved to make it happen? Me saying "when I become dictator I will ban sex" is said in the context of "Amazing, we have generated so much hent- anime" so perhaps I mean the banning of pornographic materials or the production of them.
The intent behind my original statement about banning sex was to in part be negatively reacting to the mention of hentai, and in the process of doing so, conveying more about my own ideas that I dislike something that exists in the realm surrounding ideas of "sex" and "hentai." The simplicity of the message is also important, as it allows for someone looking in to easily look at the message and quickly come to some understanding of it. The message may also be vague, which may serve the purpose of easily allowing someone to project their own ideas onto the statement in a way more compatible to themselves since it could allow for many different interpretations.
A solution that covers every living human, for most of the cases for what I could mean by "sex," would take a significant amount of effort to implement.
There are a couple ways to approach the problem: Given I have significant power, the problem could be made easier by reducing the population. It's a lot easier to prevent some kind of "sex" among 10 people than among 1000 people. If "sex" means reproduction, then mass sterilization is also relatively simple.
I will go down the line of reasoning for your own suggestion, to use existing home assistant devices that could be repurposed as mass surveillance devices. The model I believe this implies is the banning of sexual activity everywhere between humans and potentially including masturbation. Devices to detect sexual activity also implies tools of enforcement that act based on what is detected, and this could likely be in the form of police that will respond to calls made by the detection system.
In order to cover everyone, we need to dramatically increase the number of home assistants, not just in people who don't have them, but also to cover the entirety of someone's living space. Visual surveillance rather than just listening to audio may also be necessary. We also likely won't trust the people living in their spaces themselves to properly set up the surveillance system, so there would need to be a massive body that manages ensuring the systems are set up properly. The systems themselves would also need tampering protections so that they can't be messed with when this large body isn't looking in their direction.
Living spaces aren't the only places people can commit sexual activity, and so far we've made the assumption that all people who do sexual activity have a place to live with the necessary resources (such as electricity) to support the surveillance system.
Vehicles, workplaces, and other public locations would need to be fitted with the surveillance system as well. Surveillance would also need to be in place for the less populated areas. There are some potential solutions, perhaps: increase quantity and quality of satellite surveillance, make it mandatory to have a listening device with someone any time they are away from the existing surveillance infrastructure, or perhaps create an absolutely massive drone network that is capable of following people around when they approach boundaries of the main surveillance infrastructure.
With a choice of the above system, it may not be necessary, but it would be a good idea to eliminate those that the surveillance system isn't initially made to fit such as homeless people. I mean eliminate in potentially many ways such as killing them or providing homes to them, but the outcome would be there would not exist any more homeless people.
Category:Trollpasta
Category:Copypasta
Category:Pages with grammar that doesn't suck
Category:Satire