nyuuzyou/wikis huggingface dataset:
North

*Gary North, Dominionist writer
*Oliver North, involved in the Iran-Contra scandal
*One of the poles of a magnet, including the Earth's geomagnetic north pole.
**A direction on the compass that indicates geographic proximity to said pole. Often used as a disambiguator in place names such as North America, North Carolina, North Dakota, North Korea, North Macedonia, etc.
**Hyperborea — a mythical far northern location on Earth
**Arctic — the actual far North
*; a value free label for the developed countries of the world that is meant to replace the old Cold War-era label "first world"
Northcom

Northcom, or the United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), is the unified command for North America under the Department of Defense (DoD). It is in charge of military operations on the North American continent and is largely integrated with NATO.
Some conspiracy theorists (mainly Alex Jones) believe that this operational command is a symbol to the people that the government of the United States has declared war on its citizens. This is of course ignores all other foreign commands (AFCOM, CENTCOM, PACCOM, etc.) that we also have not declared war on. Unless the reality is that the United States has declared war on the entire globe, in which case the DoD has done a very good job of portraying global peace.
==External links==
*US Northcom website
Category:Conspiracy theories
Category:Military
Nosode

A nosode is a homeopathicUsing a strict definition of 'homeopathy', nosodes are in fact isopathic rather than homeopathic. therapy that could be described as an 'oral vaccine'. Nosodes are derived from pathological substances; i.e. tissue, blood, pus, mucus, sweat, urine, feces from a diseased human or animalThe Skeptic's Dictionary: Nosode but may also include fungi.Similima.com: A Study of Nosodes & Sarcodes
For example, a rabies nosode could be prepared from the saliva of a rabid dog which is then "potentized" through homeopathic succussion/dilution techniques. Ben Goldacre's Bad Science blog reported that Malaria Nosode 30 was made from rotting vegetation from marsh areas where the mosquito breeds.Bad Science: Sense About Science Malaria & Homeopathy Sting
The opposite of a nosode is a "sarcode" which is prepared from a healthy specimen.
==See also==
*Feces therapy
*Urine therapy
==References==
Category:Homeopathy
Nostalgia

Nostalgia in its primary sense refers to a longing for times past, which can range from fondly reminiscing on events of the past to obsessing so much over a past event that you try and build a time machine out of a DeLorean to travel back to relive the event over and over again.Although, that wasn't why Doc built the time machine. It is not to be confused with a pain in the nose, which would be nasalgia. Quite often, nostalgia is employed by an erstwhile privileged class (e.g. White dudes) complaining about being unable to lord it over everybody else in the current era.
==Triggering nostalgia==
Nostalgia is usually triggered by something which reminds one of a past event, or sometimes when one is doubtful about their present or future situations. People looking back nostalgically tend to see things selectively from a positive aspect, glossing over most, if not all, negative aspects in a memory.
==Nostalgia as a political tool==
Politicians, usually but not always of the reactionary variety, will sometimes invoke nostalgia for a "golden age" in order to try to roll back changes in the law or culture. A good example was Saint Reagan.
The 2016 Brexit referendum in the UK featured the "leave" side pandering to the kind of people who longed for the time when the United Kingdom colonised half of the world and people could leave their front doors open. This also appealed to that proportion of the population who are still fighting the Second World War and think that bringing back National Service/hanging/corporal punishment in state schools (select one or more as applicable) is going to solve all of the country's problems.
==Nostalgic==
A nostalgic refers to a person who suffers from nostalgia on a regular basis, frequently longing for times past to occur once again. In response to this, the friend of a nostalgic has a choice of a few routes to take in order to "cure" the person from his/her nostalgia:
#Show the nostalgic a good time to remind him that the future isn't so bleak after all.
#Remind the person that the past wasn't that great after all by reminding the person of the negative aspects of the time.
#Say angrily to the nostalgic, "Before! Before! You're living in the past, man! Quit living in the past!"
===Examples===
*A "Whenwe"; typically a white former Zimbabwean, or generally any British expat, who has moved to South Africa, and continually bores his new neighbours with tales of the old country, as in "when we lived in Rhodesia", or "when we were back home". It is not a term of endearment.
*People who get overly attached to Confederate monuments.
*"Make America great again!"
==Reality of nostalgia==
Remember how awesome everything was when you were a kid? Everybody lied to you.
==See also==
*Good old days
*Golden age
*Conservatism
*Republican Party
*Fascism
**Trumpism
==References==
==Notes==
Category:Psychology
Not Circular Reasoning

__NOTOC__
Jonathan Sarfati, of CMI, in the September 2008 issue of CMI's Creation magazine, made an attempt to argue his way out of the circle pictured below. In typical Sarfati style, what he writes is so off the wall that it is not even wrong. In this side-by-side, we examine the article in its entirety.
==Starting assumptions==
===Self-consistency===
===Consistent with the real world===
==Breaking the circle==
==How evolutionary reasoning undercuts itself==
==Jesus affirmed Scripture!==
==Conclusion==
==References==
==Notes==
Category:Creationism
Category:Fallacious arguments
Category:Misnomers
Category:Side-by-side articles
Category:Refutations
Not all

Not all (also known as Not all X) is a turn of phrase that attempts to force unnecessary "nuance" into a subject that already has nuance, either by:
#Deflecting fully specific criticism by pretending it's actually quite unspecific (first form), or
#Insisting that you need not be specific yourself when dishing out criticism to others (second form)
The Not all fallacy is employed in the hopes of shutting down conversation by making the opponent appear to lack all nuance.
==The first form==
===Example===
The first variant of the fallacy is when someone tries to deflect a specific example with a general blanket statement:
==The second form==
===Example===
The second variant of the fallacy, where Person A is at fault, instead denotes when someone tries to demand that a blatant overgeneralization not be questioned:
==Not all men==
"Not all men" is a specific form, and probably the most famous application of this phrase. It was coined by Twitter user sassycrass in 2013 but rapidly shot to fame after the 2014 Isla Vista killings in response to those who argued that Elliot Rodger's murder spree was being blamed on all men, instead of being the result of misogyny on Rodger's part. #NotAllMen became a shorthand to expose the "not all men" response, along with its many paraphrases, as a defensive knee-jerk reaction which just serves to derail conversations about sexism, and shift the focus from victims of sexism to a perceived but nonexistent slight to oneself, which is effectively a form of mansplaining.
However, in the rare case that the original complaint about sexism is indeed a blatant generalization which explicitly and unequivocally states something derogatory about "All men…", then this is the second form of the fallacy identified above, and "not all men" is a valid response.
==See also==
*No true Scotsman
*One of the good ones
*Rape culture#Addressing the "not all men" defense
*Manosphere glossary#Not all women are like that
==External links==
* 
==References==
Category:Fallacies
Not in Our Genes

Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature () is a 1984 book criticizing biological determinism, racialism, sociobiology, and related pseudosciences. It was written by Richard Lewontin, Steven Rose, and Leon Kamin, a geneticist, neuroscientist, and psychologist, respectively. It also takes a decidedly political stance, criticizing biological determinism etc. as supposedly being devised to justify social inequalities, and promoting a radical socialist alternative to such concepts.
==Reviews==
Unsurprisingly, prominent sociobiologist Richard Dawkins gave the book an unfavorable, tongue-in-cheek review. Some select quotes: "…to think that, through all these years working in universities, I had imagined that the purpose of science was to solve the riddles of the Universe: to comprehend the nature of existence, of space and time and of eternity; of fundamental particles spread through 100 billion galaxies; of complexity and living organisation and the slow dance through three billion years of geological time. No no, these trivial matters fade into insignificance beside the overriding need to legitimate bourgeois ideology."Review by Richard Dawkins of Not in Our Genes by S.Rose, L.Kamin, & R.Lewontin, Richard Dawkins, New Scientist, January 24, 1985, pp. 59-60 Also unsurprisingly, socialists were much bigger fans of the book, with one of them dubbing it an "indispensable ideological weapon" against "bigotry" like that espoused by Charles Murray.The Dialectical Biologists The book has been criticized for its discussion of IQ testing, and its dismissal of research supporting a genetic basis for schizophrenia.Not in Our Genes, by Richard C. Lewontin, Steven Rose, and Leon J. Kamin, Bernard D. Davis, Commentary, January 1985
==References==
Category:Books-related stubs
Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution

Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution is a book authored by Ray Comfort and published in 2009. Of course right in the title we have a rather major problem: evolution has nothing to do with the creation of anything from nothing, which is a well-known creationist strawman that conflates evolution with the origin of the universe.
==Preface==
==Chapter 1: The Evolution Illusion==
===Verbal Magic===
===The Eye===
===Let's Make an Eye===
 
==Chapter 2: The Intellectual Embarrassment==
==Chapter 3: How did life begin?==
===From Dust to Dust===
==Chapter 4: Intellectual Degradation==
===My "Dishonesty" and Evolution===
===Confessions of a Backsliden Atheist===
==Chapter 5: Ignorant knuckle-draggers==
==Chapter 6: The Dinosaur in the Bible==
===The Whale===
==Chapter 7: The Blind Faith in the Theory of Evolution==
==Chapter 8: The Straw Man==
==Chapter 9: Who killed JFK?==
==Chapter 10: The Mirror==
==Chapter 11: The Subject of Lying==
===Children and their Propensity to do wrong===
==Chapter 12: The Missing Link Finally Found==
===Charles Darwin Believed Man Evolved from Monkeys===
===The Catholic Church and Evolution===
===Smile Test===
==Chapter 13: The Atheist's Amazing Imagination==
===The Open mind of an Atheist===
 
===Getting Things Humming===
===Tough Answers for Atheists===
===How Big is the Universe?===
==Chapter 14: The Power of the Imagination==
===By the Light of the Silvery Moon===
===An Important Question===
===Berkeley Brainwashing - Trees Are Our Cousins===
===The Investigator===
===Painted Into A Corner===
===An Atheist's Honest Question===
==Chapter 15: Bird Brain==
===The Unanswered Prayer of the Atheist===
===Evolution and Beginnings===
===Which Came First===
===The God of the Old Testament===
==Chapter 16: Right on the Money==
==Chapter 17: What Really Matters==
===The Absurdity of Christianity===
===This is what you are saying...===
===Species-to-species definition===
===The Game of Speculation===
===Open-Minded Evolutionist===
Opens with a question from an anonymous person asking Ray if he labels everyone who disagrees with him as an "atheist".
==Chapter 18: Bikers, an Atheist, and Vampires==
===Conclusion===
==See also==
*Atheism
*Kirk Cameron
*Way of the Master
*You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, but You Can't Make Him Think
==External links==
*Google Books: Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution
*Idiot of the Week: Ray Comfort—This repeats themes of the book.
==References==
Category:Religious books
Category:Ray Comfort
Category:Refutations
Category:Side-by-side articles
Category:Purity culture
Nova

* Nova Scotia
* Joanne Nova
* A science show on PBS, which has been hosted by both Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson
* A model of Chevrolet automobile, known in Spanish as no va (does not work)
* A Marvel Comics superhero with the secret identity of Richard Rider
* A white dwarf star in a mass-exchange binary system that accretes enough material on its surface to undergo a burst of nuclear fusion
* A Latin adjective meaning "new"
November 3rd Seattle nuclear attack

The November 3rd Seattle nuclear attack is a conspiracy theory about a supposed false flag operation that was supposed to happen on 3 November 2019 in Seattle, Washington. The purported evidence for this consists of references taken from old episodes of The Simpsons (particularly S07E09 "Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming"), the 2002 film the 2018 J-pop song "Let's Start WW3" by and other random media.False flag attack, nuke strike on Seattle 3rd November 2019, YouTube, 24 September 2019.
The conspiracy theory was covered by the usual assortment of kooks and wingnuts.Has Another 9-11 Type False Flag Attack Been Planned For Seattle On Sunday November 3rd? christiansfortruth.com, 1 November 2019.Will the Apocalypse and WW3 start in Seattle? bennettleeross.com, 24 October 2019. An article in Before It's News, everyone's favorite paranoid conspiracy bullshit website, suggested that everyone play with "the Gematrinator" to understand the complex web of conspiracy forecasting the event.CenturyLink Field Seattle: "There's a Nuke Coming" (November 3rd, 2019) Before It's News, 1 November 2019.
On 3 November 2019, Seattle was not destroyed by nuclear weapons. However, the Ali Kuşçu astronomy center in Ankara, Turkey was damaged by fire on this day.Massive fire ravages astronomy center in Ankara, Turkey. sott.net, 3 November 2019. Because the facility has a spire-like structure that vaguely resembles the wingnuts claimed that this was proof of the conspiracy theory: remember this next time a conspiracy theorist tells you that their theory is falsifiable.
== See also ==
* November 4th Antifa Civil War
==References==
Category:Conspiracy theories
Category:Hoaxes
Nsnbc.me

:Not to be confused with MSNBC, who probably aren't aware this site copied 4/5ths of their name.
nsnbc.me, or nsnbc ìnternational, is a lowercase alternative news site created in 2013 by a Danish man named Christoff Lehmann as a replacement for his blog.about nsnbc international | nsnbc international The website is one of the more professional-looking crank sites. However, under the shiny exterior, the website supports a wide range of conspiracy theories and woo.
nsnbc features articles supporting 9/11 conspiracy theories,Confession - nsnbc international | nsnbc international9/11 Insider Trading Revisited | nsnbc international FEMA concentration camps,Syria, Amnesty Subversion and a Bit of Sarcasm | nsnbc international Bilderberg conspiracies,Who will be Attending the Bilderberg Meeting? What Will be Discussed | nsnbc international Zionist conspiracies,Give me Logic or Give me Terror | nsnbc international Rothschild conspiracies, Monsanto conspiracies,Monsanto: the unrepentant repeat offender | nsnbc international Séralini's discredited rat study,Ratted out: Scientific journal bows to Monsanto over anti-GMO study | nsnbc international vaccine-induced autism,Epidemic Rise in Autism Linked to Vaccine Induced Diabetes – Growing, Worldwide Concerns about Vaccine Safety | nsnbc international fluoride conspiracies,50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation | nsnbc international and cancer woo.GMOs Now Linked to Leukemia | nsnbc international
== See also ==
*Globalresearch.ca, another alternative news site whose stories are often featured on nsnbc.
==External links==
*nsnbc international
==References==
Category:Clogosphere
Category:Conspiracy theorists
Category:Websites
Category:Webshites
Nuclear disarmament

Nuclear disarmament refers to the efforts of political movements and states to reduce or eliminate nuclear weapons with the goal of achieving a world free of nuclear weapons. Whether this is possible given the apparent utility of nuclear weapons for (hypothesized) deterrence or if it would affect the likelihood of war waged with other weapons is unclear. In any case, most countries that currently have nuclear weapons aren't going to give them up any time soon.
After the fall of the USSR, the republics of Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan surrendered the Soviet nuclear weapons stationed on their territory to Russia in exchange for promises that Russia (and others) would respect their borders, which is part of why Russia's conquest "protection" of Crimea is such a problem. Many nonproliferation and disarmament treaties have been signed as well, which have helped the cause to some extent. However, the only country that has ever fully dismantled its nuclear arsenal is South Africa. In some cases, countries that were in varying degrees of closeness to achieving nuclear capability abandoned their nuclear projects or at least its military aspect. One example of this is Germany, that never resumed its wartime research into nuclear weapons. Brazil similarly got rid of its nuclear arms project when the regime changed from authoritarian to democratic.see 
==Peace Symbol==
The original meaning of the Peace Symbol was a combination of the semaphore letters N and D, for "Nuclear Disarmament". But of course, the symbol took on more meaning as time went on.
==See also==
*Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (the organization that originated the "peace sign")
==References==
Category:Nuclear energy
Category:Political movements
Nuclear energy denial

Nuclear energy denial is the belief that nuclear energy does not exist. Consequentially, nuclear weapons and nuclear power do not exist, and are simply hoaxes perpetrated by The Powers That Be for some undoubtedly nefarious reason. Yes, some people believe this, or at least it sure appears that way. Not to be confused with the anti-nuclear movement, who just don't want nuclear energy to be used.
== External links ==
* Nukelies, a site that used to live at nukelies.com. The forum was archived in 2012, but whoever is hosting the archive is continuing to update the page with new "proof".
* Heiwa Co, a beautifully frothing green ink website by Anders Björkman, "shows" that atomic bombs do not work, that peaceful nuclear power stations do work and of course also that the Moon landings and September 11 attacks were faked.
Category:Conspiracy theories
Category:Denialism
Category:Nuclear energy
Nuclear family

The nuclear family refers to a family with constant meltdowns typical Western family consisting of a father figure and a mother figure (of the male and female genders, respectively) and a couple of little kids (at least 2) running around. The nuclear family was the all-American Dream of the '50s: a working father, a stay-at-home mother, little Susie and Billy gettin' B's at school and the family dog Skipper eating mom's home-baked pies before the kids get in. These families are exemplified by such horrific sitcoms as The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet and the abominable Leave it to Beaver. Not even outer space was safe with the nuclear family of Lost in Space.
==Downfall==
The purported "downfall" of the nuclear family is an illusion, since the "nuclear family" as a mainstream model only ever existed in the minds of conservative Americans, trying to frame a world where their ideals were the norm.
The reality is that for most of human history (and throughout every culture) families are what happenstance tosses together, generally including the mother and father, the children, and grandparents who acted as the primary caregiver while the mother and father were trying to get enough food to feed everyone. Throughout most of human history, it would not be uncommon to see single parents needing to raise children, or adult siblings living together to better support the household, the farm, the king, or whatever other need presented itself.
But for a few short years, the conservative world view ruled (at least on TV), until the sexual revolution of the 1960s and rock 'n' roll music brought a shocking end to that sweet illusion. Today, families come in all kinds of Weapons of Mass Destruction, not just Nuclear, including gay couples or singles who've adopted kids, one-parent families created not just by circumstance but by choice, and, thanks to the modern economy, a return to adult children living at home.
So clearly, the destruction of the nuclear family is therefore the fault of the liberal agenda.
==See also==
* Golden age
* Nostalgia
== External links ==
* proposition43.org - "Outlaw Nuclear Families"
Category:Sociology
Category:Sexism
Nuclide

A nuclide is a class of atom: a collection of all atoms that have the same number of protons and neutrons in their nuclei, for example, 19F. Nuclear properties, such as neutron absorption cross-section, half-life of decay, nuclear spin, and atomic mass, are unique for each nuclide. Chemical properties depend only on the number of protons.To an approximation. Actually the number of neutrons also has an effect, although in most cases it is very small. See and . A group of nuclides with the same number of protons is called an element.
"Nuclide" is probably what most people mean when they say "isotope," which is something different. Two nuclides are isotopes if they have the same number of protons, but a different number of neutrons. This is equivalent to stating that they belong to the same element, so it is possible to say, for example, "isotope of carbon." The big difference is that the word "isotope" expresses a relation between nuclides, so using it alone is not strictly correct: "decay of radioactive isotopes" should actually be "decay of radioactive nuclides."
==Notes==