Archives:Main Page Talk/2

==Suggestion for Requested sections==
I was curious if anyone had suggested a Requested Images or Templates page ? I'd think it would be a logical choice for those who've seen interesting pictures that might make perfect additions to articles, such as the recent "Family Guy/Simpsons" picture on this month's Mad Magazine, and are either unable to find or upload them. 70.88.218.145 17:59, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:There's a Requested Pictures page, though that's mainly been used to request photoshopped images. No requested templates page that I know. Of. Of which I know. -- 18:12, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::Until such a section gets created (although most people could just create the templates they need, and then request someone improve it on that template's talk page), the best place probably would be at Uncyclopedia talk:Templates, I think? -- 19:55, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Scabrous sea-dogs ahoy==
Scurvilicious makeover courtesy of Elvis and the letter arrrr. -- 06:58, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:Damn. Life got busy and I forgot all about this. Great work guys! I guess I'll go walk the plank... -- 13:50, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
From the Sydney Morning Herald:
"It was with interest that I read about 'Talk-Like-A-Pirate Day' and was wondering if there were any links between that and those folk from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?" writes Bec Hopkins, of Randwick. "These folk believe the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster with His noodley appendage, and teachers of these beliefs must wear His chosen outfit, which is full pirate regalia." There could well be, Bec. Both schools of thought exhibit the highest intellectual rigour, and clearly have a common purpose.--Bugmenot 21:52, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
==Featured Article Template==
Its overlapping with the news template, cutting off sections of the sentences in the featured article. Well on IE anyway. --Nytrospawn
:Ergh. Great. Think you could upload a picture of it? I changed the image coding on the template yesterday after Splaka found a way to link images directly with articles. That might be causing the weirdness. It looks right in Opera though. -- 17:28, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Possible UnNews Image ?==
x250|center|thumb|Breaking news as longtime Uncyclopedia vandal known as "El Barto" was captured recently. As he remains in custody, it is rumored his punishment may range from public execution by huffing to being sentenced to work in the limbo of 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet. More on this story as it develops.
Here you go: UnNews:Longtime Uncyclopedia Vandal "El Barto" Captured. I'll link to it on the main page too. Once it gets long enough someone can put it on the UnNews main page. -- 00:06, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Wootalorium, somebody mentioned my name for some reason!
It's become a bit Just Stupid and Not Funny though. (EDIT: Edited) --Carlos the Mean 18:56, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Main page format==
I made some (mostly minor) changes to the main page setup here. Tell me if anyone doesn't like the changes. I'm also beginning to think the main page is too big and cluttered with boxes. I've been trying to, for want of a better word, harmonize the various elements of the front page. If you look at Wikipedia, their front page is pretty sparse and quite attractive to my eye. Unfortunately I don't know that much code, so I'm having a lot of trouble shifting things around without screwing up the format completely, so if anyone wants to step in and try to make things a little easier on the eyes, please go ahead.
I think one of the main problems is that the featured article/recent news/etc. section keeps getting too long. We might want to be a bit more diligent in cutting those sections back. --Rcmurphy KUN 23:37, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:There isn't much there to really modify. All the "expendable" stuff is at the bottom, and thus doesn't make the page any more accessible if gone. Either we axe all the non-link stuff on the front page (Featured article, news, DYK, etc) or we have to force rigid limits on the lengths of those articles. I don't see another way of trimming this, short of killing all but one highlight box. 
:And now looking at wikipedia, we match it closely, and all I can see changing would be to streamline our massive ramble at the top of the page. However, if we keep the featured image there and the same size, it doesn't make a difference, as I'm guessing the image size dictates the space we have for our welcome at the top. Dunno, dunno. But bare minimum we need to fix our intro. It's a little too clunky as-is. 00:32, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::I may lose adminship for it, but I actually got off my ass (err, stayed on it, actually) and did something instead of just yap about it. I tweaked our help page, and streamlined the "read this first" stuff on the main page. It takes up less room, and I'm assuming that if people were ambitious enough to clickie-clickie before, they still will be. We'll see, I guess. The rest of my above rant stands. 00:45, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:::I thought about it, but I got too lazy to deop. --Chronarion 17:33, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::::I just hope you stay that lazy when you see the polish work I'm currently doing on the Wilde project. Killing/rewriting bad quotes, fixing formatting, etc. I've given up monitoring the Making up Oscar Wilde quotes page. I just swing by every month or so and delete all the really stupid-ass shit. Man, this is really anon-user work I'm doing. We need to get some more of those. -- 18:18, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::I don't necessarily mean we need to get rid of anything, but I think trying to combine a couple sections (like how I combined the language and sista projects sections on the alternate main page) might make it look a tad less cluttered. Regarding the featured article section, I'm going to try to shorten up the excerpts a bit, and hopefully that will lead people to keep the DYK and News box the name length as the featured article box. Because of its format, though, I can't really shorten the current featured article any more.
::There's also an awful lot of bold and italicized text, which I find sort of difficult to read (although much of it is actually necessary). --Rcmurphy KUN 04:50, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Uncyclopedia is going PLUS==
Main Page (Plus!)
When should we go live with the news? --Savethemooses 23:09, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:I think this news item should be restricted to Uncyclopedia Plus+ users. -- 23:14, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
This effin sucks. Why can't I view that page? Unauthorized username? WTF? I'm a god damn admin here. Howscome parts of the site are off limit for me? 00:00, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:But are you an Admin Plus+? -- 00:03, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::Admin plus what? Plus sizes? I guess I can buy more Cheetos, and now that you mention it, my Mountain Dew supply is getting low...00:23, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Two issues: One, we need a new logo to reflect the change. Two, we need to determine when to make this the main page. --Savethemooses 00:19, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:Now. Isn't it prime season for the historic AOL flood? 00:23, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:I took the liberty of using Splaka and Spintherism's 3D potato to make a logo. Elvis says the next "special day" is coming up pretty soon, so we'd better put this front page up within a couple days, or else hold off for a couple weeks. --Rcmurphy KUN 04:03, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::So do we have liftoff? --Savethemooses 16:06, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:::I say go ahead. I don't want to mess with changing the logo, though, so someone else will have to do that. I have a couple more ideas for the front page after it's been put up, too. --Rcmurphy KUN 16:31, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==International Blog Day Complaints==
Website Looks Cheap
The nice layout that once was is no more. The site looks like some 10 year old's attempt at HTML.
Please change it back to the original layout.! --Heavenlybubbles lunch time, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Blogger Style
This style is a big ouchy on the eyeballs. Please revert to the standard view ASAP.
And what happened to the Anniversary section anyway?? --Steve Johnsenson 05:58, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
It's OK folks. Breathe. It may shock you, but we do satire here. The goal of that page was satire of LJ and other atrocious blogs. It's over now. You can come back. And happy blog day 2005. --Famine 21:16, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I was quite unhappy about the premature abortion of the format --Nytrospawn 20:04, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:OMG the websitee was suxxors! Thanx 4 changin it back! LOLOLOL --Savethemooses 17:06, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Corny Jebus==
I believe Jebus died in something like 1931 A.D., so the date of his last corniess is wrong. Also, was Jebus corny at all. most modern Japusaians say no: he was born a man to die for our sins HOWEVER he neveractied human or had any normal emotions. This would be the vast loud group of fundamentalist Japusaians who have made it so you still can't rent "the Last Tempatation of JapUSA" at Blockbuster.
I have proof that Mr. Jebus was corny, because he did a comedy tour, vaudville style, in 1925, which was cut short because people tended to walk out of about 1/2 way through his performance.
:I am sure that while questions like, "Was Jebus ever really corny?" are encouraged here, in the context of the rest of your comment, I donae think anybody really gives a shee-yaht. And yes, modern Jebusologists confirm that Jebus was in fact quite corny, thus the hanging around with prostitutes. --210.246.30.52 05:26, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
But how do you explain how so many fundies think Jesus was completely asexual?
:How can he have been asexual if he was getting it on with Mary M? 
----
==Comments==
How do I leave comments in the text of an article, you know, non visible content?--Nytrospawn 16:01, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
: Surround them in HTML comment tags <!-- and -->--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 16:31, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
::Or use the alternate comment code which consists of three to four apostrophes on either side of your comment. --Famine 18:47, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
==Wikipedia vs. Uncyclopedia==
And no hilarity does not ensue. 
:Are you kidding? We kicked their ass!!! Golf rules, of course. --Famine 13:39, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
::I have lost faith in the internets--Nytrospawn 17:33, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I have regained my faith in the interweb --Nytrospawn 01:07, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
:*I was going to suggest that, but then I got blindsided by the feeble overwhelming attack by our very own Sherrod--Flammable CUN 01:27, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
::*Good lord man...even Wilde's grandmother could put the smackdown on Encyclopedia Dramatica - Lord Byron 
:::* 
::::(Note to self: Insert random "sleeping with (grand)mother last night" quote here) - Lord "And why the hell don't I have a template ?" Byron
:::::*
::::::*"That's what she said last night." - Lord Byron 
:::::::* 
::::::::*News Flash ! Byron get's last word over Wilde ! - Lord "If u can read this Wilde jus got pwn3d" Byon
*What a scoop ! (takes picture and runs off to UnNews) - Papparatso 
Dear reader, 
As you can see the author has obviously gotten in way over his head. Could some enterprising User please remove this conversation. Thank you. Where the deuce is Flammable when you need him. - Oscar Wilde
Heh heh. Lord Byron pwns all of you. --Savethemooses 01:17, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:As you can see the people have spoken. - Lord "of the Blingage" Byron. 
:: on stealing back quotes from The Simpsons (hey everyone else does it) 
==Wikerpedia==
Just curious if anyone's checked out Wikerpedia or does it not qualify as UNnews ? 64.12.116.202 04:54, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
:Somewhat limited in scope, but one can't help but admire their dedication. --Rcmurphy 
Beats Wikipedia anyday --Crest 01:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
KUN 05:24, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
==Weird Front Page Changes==
:I think its great to change front page boilerplates once in a while, to keep our interest, but do you think the change folks can check their spelling? I would have loved to correct the mistakes but I don't have admin access. Sorry! AnalAlien 11:11, 4 July 2005 (MST)
:: Speeling is bad on pupeouse it's from the uncyclopedia simple edition for Americans and other simpletons (it's our gift to you for the 4th of July.) normal service will be resumed when an American admin spots it and goes on a desysoping spree, I'm sure. --Elvis 21:24, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:Well, as an American sysop who not only approved but assisted, I hope that this initial poor, misguided attempt at holidaic humor will sow the seeds for more holiday-specific front pages. We need to make sure we damage people regardless of race, creed, or national origin. I may make it my new project, if I have enough other work that needs avoiding. --Famine 00:20, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::On Halloween we should make fun of Wiccans. --Savethemooses 20:55, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Today's main page is priceless. Kudos. I bow. --Famine 18:41, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:: I guess I'll take the kredit for starting today's page, what with the International Page Blanking day stuff. You can thank me with cash. --Savethemooses 18:47, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:::I tried to blank the monthly awards template but the page formatting went all funny, so I ;];]reverted it back, also I sorta figured it wasn't fair to LeeHarveyKennedy. --Elvis 21:42, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:::I'll take credit coining the term, then ;) Hooloovoo 13:06, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
It being July 31 normal service has been resumed, until..........--Elvis 01:09, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:Oh dear. Swiss? What have you been up to now, Elvis? General Specific 23:47, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::It will be (in about 10 mins) the swiss national holiday, we just didn't realise that International Page Blank day would be so soon :-) --Elvis 23:49, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:::Credits to User:Famine, User:Rcmurphy and User:Carlb --Elvis 23:56, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
This isn't a WikiWikiWeb, it's a WakiWakiWeb. --Alex
==Article Idea==
It would be interesting to have two articles arguing with each other over facts, each claiming the other is false. Are there any articles like this? If not, may I write them? -LSK
:I like that idea, very uncyclopedia style. If an article like this exists, I havn't come across it. --Paulgb Talk 01:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I don't agree, I think it's terrible. And I'm sure you've come across an article just like it. You're obviously utterly wrong. --Goomball 13:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Please write them, that would be great. We currently have one, which argues against Wikipedia's version. See Wikipedia. --Chronarion 23:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:The Ninja Page was like that a while ago only it's deteriorated into a delete-fest--iMacThere4iAm 13:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Ilikeit.Mevotesyeeees.. --Mathew 13:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I think Goomball should write an article that specifically argues in favor of avoiding argumentation. --Blat 16:39, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==Database Error==
I ran out of disk space and it caused a biiiig problem. If you see a 'database error' page, edit the page, add a space, and save it to fix it. --Chronarion 13:44, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
:Will previous diffs ever be available again? --Paulgb Talk 14:42, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
::I am not currently sure. I have a database backup from April 13th, but that's nearly a month ago.. I also have another backup from right before I purged the diffs. The problem is, ironically, I don't have enough storage space to store the diffs!! Until I have enough space, I can't restore the diffs, and by the time that I do, I probably can't restore them without significant effort. You can pick them out of the DB dump if you're crazy enough though, or if there are any mediawiki experts around, perhaps they can help me. --Chronarion 15:15, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
:::Diffs have been repaired. --Chronarion 02:03, 7 May 2005 (EDT)
==Featured Article Image==
Is it me, or is that picture in the middle of the screen, blocking the News collumn? --Nytrospawn 22:23, 29 May 2005 (EDT)
No, I'm having the same problem, but only using IE6. No problems in Opera.
(hey, but did you know that 90% of browsers are IE6... :) It looks very ugly and unprofessional... ) -User:Nemmo 2:43 AM
Er, did I mess something up? It also looks right for me in Opera 8.01. (And really, that's what everybody should be using.) Firefox 1.0.3 is fine too. Opening IE is a scary operation for me, but someone is welcome to try and fix the Template:Featuredimage page to make it safe for IE. I don't see that I did anything odd when I changed the image this morning, though... --Rcmurphy 03:03, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:I'm not seeing any problems here... And I just opened IE6 to check. So, I don't see what the fuss is about. It might have to do with your screen resolution. try running at least at 1024x768 if you can. Otherwise, I don't know what to tell you. --PantsMacKenzie 03:06, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==URL==
I am fiddling with the URL format. Let me know if there are bugs. --Chronarion 11:22, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I've protected the main page. Uncyclopedia:Beta to make changes you wish to appear.
I don't like the "Sauron is Lord of the Dance" picture. It is distracting, makes the main page uglier, and doesn't look anywhere as nice as the baked potato. I'm getting rid of it on Uncyclopedia:Beta . See if you like it better that way. --Singingcamel 14:34, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)
:It has been discussed before, and it was a unanimous decision that sauron would stay. See Uncyclopedia:Community Portal/archive1#Vote for Sauron
:Oops forgot to sign --Paulgb Talk 14:36, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)
== Screw Sauron! ==
The picture isn't funny. Remove it and, if possible, replace it with Mr. T, or something else people other than potheads find funny. --Evice 02:57, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
Seconded. However, Mr. T is equally unfunny. So is Oprah, a kitten, Jackson, Bush, a monkey, or anything else that people call "funny" that ends up in 70% of horse-beater shitty articles. Sheep 15:44, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
:I'm perfectly fine with there being no image at all. --Evice 18:49, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
:You are welcome to make the articles funnier. There is a sad truth that there's a lot of crap in here. However, this was known when the site went up, and difficult to avoid. I recommend, therefore, that you go for the very low end rather than trying to sharpen an article that's already declared "non crap". --Chronarion 01:25, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
A large argument for dropping it that the wikipedia main page dosn't have an image there.--Elvis 18:31, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
There was a huge vote about this a while ago, and it was decided unanomously that Sauron stays. Any changes should be agreed on by some of us who have been around since the old layout, because we would really miss Sauron. (Uncyclopedia:Community Portal/archive1#Vote for Sauron)--Paulgb Talk 18:39, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
:Just keep the retarded image on the alternate page and make the "real" main page imageless. Elvis is right about the imageless version making the main page look more like Wikipedia and less like a two-year-old's Geocities page. --Evice 18:53, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
::Unfortunately, I am a two year old, and this is hosted on geocities. No, not really. But neither am I a pothead, and I would recommend that those of you that claim not to be, phrase your arguments in a more eloquent fashion. I am open to another vote on the issue, however, name calling will not be tolerated. Words such as 'retarded' are unnecessary and do not help to stress your point. Please open a vote in the community portal if you wish to replace or remove the image present. --Chronarion 01:21, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
::The front page would be far more interesting with some dynamic interest. Everything else is dynamic, why not the 1st picture you see when you hit the site? Maybe 5 people voted for the immature looking Sauron picture, but what about the 100's of people who visit the site that might find it somewhat skittles-esque and outdated? Let people change it and add to the interest of the website. --user:anon
:::Open a vote on this, and if it passes, i'll go with it. Personally I don't feel that an audience that would have their personal taste threatened by a goofball picture would make a good match for the site anyway though, but vote if you will. You may wish to read the old vote, there's more than five users there.--Chronarion 02:06, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
::::...But it certainly isn't the whole site. Polls such as this should be exposed to the public, just as with the picture in question. --Evice 23:28, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
::::And just for the record, I count eleven users, when there appear to be 963 registered, most of which probably don't know what a community portal is, or that there even is one. Feel free to weed out sockpuppets, though. --Evice 23:33, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
:::::I really can't force people to vote, you know? So all I can do is go by whoever votes. It IS a public poll. It's right underneath the picture, there's a link. --Chronarion 17:42, 5 May 2005 (EDT)
::::::Nobody can force anyone to vote. Otherwise Bush may have not won the '04 election. --Evice 17:53, 5 May 2005 (EDT)
:::::::As Far as I'm aware the French are forced to vote.....--Elvis 18:31, 5 May 2005 (EDT)
By the way, I'll admit that I was in a bad mood when I started this section. --Evice 18:06, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==Constantly Vandalized Pages==
The page is pretty self-explanitory, but the policy isn't official so I was wondering what people think? --Paulgb Talk 15:04, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
----
:Being a relative newbie and needing the writing therapy Uncyclopedia provides, it's beyond me why users feel a need crap all over the place by vandalizing pages. --AnalAlien 21:15 2 July 2005 (EDT)
:What's the point of locking templates and the main page? Seems Uncyclopedic, especially since nothing from the Uncyclopedia:Beta page is ever implemented. --Evice 18:54, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
::This is incorrect. I believe you are referring only to the sauron image and distorting the truth to fit your argument. Although this is encouraged everywhere else, it is not on the talk pages. It is protected in a similar reason to wikipedia, that is, vandalism leaves a very bad impression on the main page itself. Particularly an issue is wikispam, which typically uses the mainpage as a target.
:::I was mainly referring to Template:Stub and Template:Wrongtitle, which are 100% public on Wikipedia. --Evice 23:35, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
:::And it would help if you would sign your posts, mmkay? --Evice 23:36, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
:The main page was protected after getting vandalised multiple times. I think we had a vote. Protecting the main page made sense because everything that would need to be changed was in templates. Things from Beta have been moved on to the main page lots of times. If you are referring to Sauron's removal, we need a good vote before somthing so extemely devistating is to happen. Some templates, like stub, are protected, which I disagree with but I don't want to unprotect it without a bit of discussion first. --Paulgb Talk 21:22, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
:Templates are protected mainly because I don't feel it's necessary to allow user access to to things like Stub, which are factual in nature, rather than nontruthful. If a particular template really wants to be unprotected, vote on it, and a sysop can oblige.--Chronarion 01:24, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
== Homepage style guide? ==
Quick qu - Over the past few weeks the hp's been looking kinda weird. The In the News section runs far beyond the vertical limit of the Featured Article section. This pushes the Recent Articles and Article Request sections down into the depths of my browser window. I'm all scrolled out.
Now I'm not one of those web monkeys and I'm viewing in 1024x768 which may be slightly odd, but should this be brought to the attention of the homepage dictators? --Commander Jameson 14:47, 16 May 2005 (EDT)
:Looks like the news section is getting too long. Recent articles should be more obvious. Feel free to do somthing about it, you can make edits here: Uncyclopedia:Beta.
::Looks ok to me? --Chronarion 22:10, 16 May 2005 (EDT)
:::I see nothing wrong with the layout of the main page. I'm using the same resolution as Commander Jameson. --Evice 22:54, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
::::People have been copy editing some of the news so that it dosn't end up quite so long so you may just have been lucky.--Elvis 05:11, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
:::::Yep, much improved now. I think folks are shortening their news items. *returns to lurking* --Commander Jameson 07:13, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
::::::Ah wait! I think it's looking good because Evil Zak is keeping on eye on the content. Well done him. --Commander Jameson 07:17, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
== roofles what the fuck ==
what the heck happened to the front page for July 4? heh
FAPPY WHORE OF JULY EVERYONE!!!
--Insertwackynamehere 16:33, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)
== That Clinjas link ==
Wouldn't it be better to code the link as [[Clinja]]s instead of [[Clinjas]]? The latter redirects, while the former doesn't. --Evice 23:10, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:It is so. --EvilZak 23:32, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==The main page sucks==
The main page sucks. :( Heh, actually I just felt like saying that. --Phroziac 16:02, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
:You mean sucks in the good way or in the bad way? --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 16:11, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
::Well, a little of both. --Phroziac 16:15, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
== . ==
I've been here for a few minutes, and I love it already.—JarlaxleArtemis 06:02, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)
== Consistency ==
Should there perhaps there should be an ignorable policy, asking readers to, if possible, stay consistent with other saga-level stuff?. Something like:
Be consistent
If you make an article referring to one of the below topics, please try to be consistent with existing information, for the sake of humour:
Oprah
Oscar Wilde
Whatever crap you want
Eh
This stuff is funny, so, if you can, stay consistent, but we don't reall care:
Again, whatever crap you want
== Bloggers main Page ==
All credit to User:Rcmurphy assisted by User:Famine, I was just the agent of change. --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:18, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
:I swear I didn't do it. it was all RCM. Take him out and shoot him for this travesty. If you can still see. I think my eyes are bleeding. --Famine 23:27, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
== Kill the Sarxx Technical Library ==
Kill the Sarxx is the number one flesh burning System in North America. Kill the Sarxx has the most production facilities, the widest network of distributors, the best support team, and the best product. In fact, Kill the Sarxx is the only method for Absolute Flesh Destruction (AFD) that provides a solid-to-solid attachment for all bloody appendages (arms, feet, even ear lobes). Our patented, exposed X-RAY Spectrometer is unique! Kill the Sarxx is the one with the stripes on the label.. 
--210.246.30.52 02:00, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
== ohhhemmmeffffjeee!!! ==
tTHAT IZ SO L33TZOR!!!!!!
== Big Problem ==
Why is "BOMFGLOL" on the top left corner? RyanCahn
:OMG WHAT IS THAT! --Rcmurphy KUN 05:08, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::General Specific uploaded a new logo for the day, BTW :File:Wiki.png to change it back, TBH I was slightly amazed that it wasn't automatically protected link the system messages.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 08:29, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
==Front Page Image==
That's my Razorglove there, that is. But does that count as a featured image? If so, I claim my CUN badge and cuddly toy -- Codeine 08:56, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:I don't think they give out cuddly toys for that... This was used for the flying spaghetti monster feature article tempate last week, and all I got was a bronzed spork. *sniff*. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 09:31, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::Ah well, never mind. It's all for the glory of Uncyclopedia, not my own. -- Codeine 10:12, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
== Fake Pages ==
Just because The Fox and the Hound Steal Money is deleted doesn't mean I can be blocked. RyanCahn
:Eh? Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Willis? --Rcmurphy KUN 23:07, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
:No need to be paranoid. No one's gonna block you unless you act like a dick (blank pages / spam rubbish everywhere / fuck with the admins). Or unless they just feel like it. -- Codeine 23:09, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
== XHTML ==
Uncyclopedia's Main Page is not XHTML-compliant, but Wikipedia's is. I created Main Page/XHTML as an XHTML-compliant version, but it's still not valid.
For it to be truly XHTML-compliant, the Stillwaters, Chronarion and "Some rights reserved" images' <img> tags must be closed (<img src="..." />) and an alternate text ("alt" attribute) provided for the latter. - Guest 15:35, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
*Okay, it's now almost XHTML-compliant. But someone de-XHTML'd Template:Featuredarticle :(. The correct version is here: Template:Featuredarticle/XHTML. - Guest 06:42, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
::I don't really know what this XHTML jive talk means, but I switched the template to your code. If the internets explode it's not my fault. -- 06:50, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)