T-54/55

T-54/55 	T-54/55
 	
T-55 in some European redneck service	T-55 in some European redneck service
Type 	Medium Tractor/ Main Battle Tractor
Place Of Origin 	Kruschevstan
In Service 	1947–today
Main Armament 	100 mm D-10T/T2/T2G etc.
Secondary Armament 	7.62mm SGMT coaxial machine gun and 12.7mm DShK machine gun
Armor 	120 mm of Stalinium at front upper glacis (T-54-1)
Engine 	V-2-54 Diesel engine (500 HP)
Mass 	36 tons
T-54/55 is a soviet tractor-type tank which was developed for restructulization of ARMYA late 1940s. However, probably more of 100 000 of these things were made and they're still in combat use.
==Origins of T-54 (Object 137)==
During World War II, the Ivans realized that their KV-2 and T-34 tanks were no longer meeting the demands of the Rush B tactic. Therefore, in 1943, the first designs for their successor began to emerge. The new machine was meant to be large and equipped with the super-ecological V-2 diesel engine, which was, of course, extremely smoky. The T-34 tank was updated with a new, very rounded turret, allowing three Ivans to fit inside instead of two, and armed with a new 85mm D-5T gun (or the ZiS S-53 of the same caliber), all on the same chassis and hull as the T-34. These tanks were very simple (the only moving parts were the V-2-34 engine and the wheels) and super effective in the RUSH B(erlin) tactic, so many units were produced. However, they were easy prey for Tigers and Panthers. This was a problem, but not because of the Ivans inside, but because of the depletion of Stalin’s steel.
In 1944, the T-44 tank was developed. This was a step between the T-34/85 and the T-54, as it had a hull nearly identical to the T-54 and a turret almost identical to the T-34/85, including the armament. However, the Steel Man himself said the T-44 was too complicated, and only a very un-Russian 1,800 units were produced. This brings us to the T-54 tank.
The project began in 1945 when engineers worked on the concept of "what if we put an even bigger gun and more armor on it?" After several attempts that resembled more of a steamroller than a combat machine, they decided that the key to success was to enlarge everything that already worked on the T-34. The result was the first version of the T-54, which weighed almost as much as a small submarine and was capable of waking up an entire village just with its engine. Prototypes of the T-54 were tested in the harsh conditions of the Russian winter. One of the most memorable moments from these tests occurred when one prototype decided to dig its own hole in the middle of the night and stay there like a steel bear preparing for hibernation. Mechanics spent two whole days trying to get the tank out, eventually admitting that it might be better to leave it there as a warning to other tanks about what happens when they don’t listen.
thumb|T-34/85 was no longer good for RUSH B tactic.
One of the highlights of the development process was the famous "Battle for the Return from the Field," where the engineers decided to test the tank in combat conditions. After the first half-hour of driving, it became clear that the tank had rather unique ideas about the direction it wanted to go. Instead of heading toward the enemy, it veered toward the nearest town, smashing the local market and finally stopping after an unsuccessful attempt to park in the village pond. This incident led to a redesign of the control system, as it was said, "A tank that doesn’t want to fight isn’t a tank, but an expensive attraction."
==T-55 (Object 138)==
thumb|Factory-new T-55s
The development of the T-55 tank began in 1955, when Soviet engineers decided they could improve upon their previous miracle, the T-54. In addition to standard upgrades, they decided to add revolutionary technology: artificial intelligence that could make decisions on behalf of the crew. This innovation was supposed to make the T-55 not only more efficient but also an "intelligent" machine on the battlefield. Unfortunately, what was meant to be a technological triumph often devolved into an absurd comedy of errors, misguided judgments, and technical mishaps.
Right from the start, the T-55 decided it would have its own opinions about everything. For instance, during one test, the tank's AI concluded that instead of directly attacking enemy positions, it would be better to first clear the battlefield of potential traps. Unfortunately, it identified every large rock and bush in the area as traps, so the crew spent hours driving around, obliterating innocent flora, while the actual enemy calmly regrouped.
One of the biggest problems with the T-55 was its smoking engine. The engineers wanted to boost performance, but the result was an engine that smoked like an old steam locomotive. When the tank moved through the landscape, it looked like a mobile cloud factory, giving the enemy plenty of time to grab a snack and wait for the tank to arrive. One soldier dryly remarked, "The T-55 is the only machine you lose sight of only when it stops smoking."
Another frustrating feature of the tank was its cramped interior. The T-55's crew had so little room that even sardines in a can would have complained about the lack of space. When the soldiers needed to move inside the tank, they had to perform complex gymnastic maneuvers that would make Olympic athletes envious. During one military parade, officers noticed that a soldier would tumble out of the tank every five minutes, rolling across the ground instead of being combat-ready.
And then there was the turret—majestic, but lethally dangerous. When the tank was hit, the T-55's turret had a tendency to launch into the air like a rocket bound for Mars. Soldiers joked that the Soviet Union wasn’t trying to compete with the U.S. space program with rockets, but with tank turrets. One witness described an incident where, after the tank was hit, the turret shot off into the sky, never to be seen again. Some soldiers claimed they saw the turret orbiting the Earth as a new satellite.
Another legendary incident occurred when the tank was driving through a city, and its AI determined that the greatest threat to its mission was traffic signs. The tank decided to uproot every sign in the area and relocate them to a "safe" place. This led to total traffic chaos, with local residents, no longer knowing where parking zones ended and pedestrian areas began, deciding it might be better to stop driving altogether.
Despite all these failures, the T-55 went on to become one of the most successful and widespread tanks of the Cold War. Its development was a journey filled with absurd situations and unbelievable moments that remain a source of dark humor for military history enthusiasts. Because, as it turns out, sometimes it takes a lot of failures to create something truly remarkable.
==Specs (T-55)==
The T-55 tank, a product of Soviet engineering and a unique blend of technology and pure vodka, was one of the most iconic tanks of the Cold War. Armed with a powerful gun, robust armor, and an undeniable Soviet spirit, this machine became a symbol of strength, as well as a source of endless humor. Here are the specifications that show why the T-55 was so unique:
Armament:
*Main Gun: The 100mm D-10T2S log launcher, capable of destroying anything in its path—if it managed to hit it. Tanks often nicknamed the "big Russian hammer" could smash anything from enemy tanks to countryside garden fences.
*Machine Guns: Coaxial 7.62mm SGMT and anti-aircraft 12.7mm DShK, ideal for turning enemy units into fireworks or celebrating a successful hit on targets that didn’t move.
Propulsion:
*Engine: The V-55, a 12-cylinder diesel engine with 581 horsepower, turned the T-55 into a mobile smokestack. At full throttle, it produced enough smoke to rival a cigarette factory. When these tanks rolled by, visibility dropped to zero, and soldiers often had to wear gas masks to avoid being knocked out by the fumes.
Armor:
*Front Armor: 100mm thick, designed to withstand hits—or at least try. In practice, the crew prayed their tank wouldn’t get hit, as the turret often blasted off like a rocket into orbit, which happened quite frequently.
*Side Armor: 80mm thick, good for stopping machine-gun fire, but against modern anti-tank rounds, the T-55 was like a tin can on wheels.
Mobility:
*Top Speed: 50 km/h on roads, 30 km/h off-road—faster than most tractors, but a lot slower than the crew’s desire to flee from battle. When the tank got going, it smoked so much the enemy couldn’t even find it, which was, in a way, an advantage.
*Range: 500 km with auxiliary fuel tanks, enough to cross the vast emptiness of Siberia—if it didn’t break down halfway.
Interior Space:
*Crew Space: Inside, there was less room than in a phone booth. The crew often had to perform acrobatics to fit in. All members became experts in yoga and learned to endure the combined smells of diesel fumes and human sweat.
Turret:
*Explosiveness: The turret was like a ticking time bomb. Upon impact, it would shoot into the air and often disappear from sight, like an unwanted satellite. This "space program" was the Soviet Union’s unofficial contribution to space exploration.
The T-55 was an unforgettable mix of raw power, ridiculous practicality, and Soviet-era humor. Despite its quirks and flaws, it went on to become one of the most widespread and successful tanks of the Cold War. Because, in true Soviet fashion, even when everything goes wrong, you keep rolling forward—smoke, rockets, and all.
==Variants==
===The T-54 Series===
====1. T-54-1 (1947)====
*Armor Thickness: The T-54-1 was a bold first step with a 120 mm thick upper glacis plate, which was far thicker than the previous T-34-85. The idea was to provide superior protection, but this added weight made the front suspension so stressed that it was practically a built-in self-destruction feature.
*Turret: The turret was a distinctly egg-shaped design, with up to 180 mm of armor. The shape earned it the nickname "egg-head," and while the rounded form offered some ballistic benefits, it also created weak points around the gun mantlet. Perfect if you wanted a tank that was great on paper, but crack-prone in reality.
*Issues: The excessive weight led to frequent cracks in the hull and suspension, and the gun mantlet’s design created shot traps that made it ideal for catching enemy rounds rather than deflecting them. The Soviet engineers quickly realized that this was not quite the armored revolution they had hoped for.
====2. T-54-2 (1949)====
thumb|T-54-2. Look at that sleek, streamlined turret.
*Weight Reduction Plan: To address the T-54-1's "iron belly" issues, the designers decided to reduce the frontal armor to 100 mm, resulting in a lighter tank. This somewhat alleviated the stress on the front suspension, though reliability was still more theory than practice.
*Turret Redesign: The turret was reshaped to be more rounded, aiming to fix the shot trap issue. While the turret was still cast, 180 mm at its thickest, the smoother profile did offer some marginal improvements in survivability, making the tank just a little bit harder to kill—by both the enemy and its own weight.
*Effective Armor Thickness: About 190-200 mm, thanks to the 100 mm sloped glacis plate. This was enough to stop most WWII-era shells, but not exactly invincible against modern ammunition.
====3. T-54-3 (1951)====
*More Armor Refinements: The T-54-3 brought a new turret design, with a refined cast shape that further reduced shot traps. The gun mantlet was also reshaped to better protect the vulnerable areas around the gun.
*Turret Armor and Glacis: The 180 mm turret armor and 100 mm frontal glacis remained, but quality control improved, making the armor slightly more consistent in thickness and structure. By this point, the T-54 had become a bit more reliable, though it still wasn't the paragon of durability that the Soviet army had hoped for.
*Stabilization and Accuracy: The stabilization was still in its infancy, meaning the tank was best used when stationary. Anything faster than a walking pace would turn its accuracy into a matter of luck.
====4. T-54A (1955)====
*Gun Stabilizer: The T-54A was the first Soviet tank to include a gun stabilizer (STP-1 "Gorizont"), allowing the 100 mm D-10TG gun to be fired with some degree of accuracy while the tank was on the move. This stabilizer wasn't exactly cutting-edge, though, and aiming at a moving target while moving was still more of an art form than a science.
*Night Vision: The tank was equipped with infrared night vision for both the driver and the gunner. "Night vision" in this case meant that you could see vague outlines in the dark—if the stars aligned, quite literally.
*Improved NBC Protection: The tank was fitted with an early NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) filtration system, which didn’t exactly make it a radiation-proof bunker, but would at least delay the inevitable.
====5. T-54B (1957)====
*Two-Plane Stabilizer: The T-54B featured a two-plane stabilizer for the D-10T2S gun, offering slightly better stabilization on both the horizontal and vertical planes. In practice, this meant you could miss moving targets from greater distances.
*Enhanced Night Vision: Both the gunner and the commander received infrared searchlights, significantly improving the odds of spotting targets at night—assuming the crew had good eyesight and a lot of patience.
*Armor Thickness: The armor remained largely the same, with 100 mm of frontal armor and up to 180 mm on the turret.
===The T-55 Series===
====1. T-55 (1958)====
*Upgraded NBC Protection: The T-55 featured a much better NBC protection system, making it the first Soviet tank to offer any real protection against nuclear fallout. This wasn’t a luxury—it was a grim necessity in a world where nuclear war seemed like just another day at the office.
*Fuel Capacity and Engine Upgrades: A more powerful engine (V-55, 580 hp) was installed to compensate for the weight of new systems, and fuel capacity was increased to extend the operational range—perfect for when you needed to drive far away from an incoming mushroom cloud.
*Armor Changes: The armor thickness was kept the same, but the T-55 had better hull welding and slightly improved turret shape. Essentially, they just made the same tank, but tried harder not to mess it up.
*Gun Upgrades: The D-10T2S gun allowed the tank to fire newer types of ammunition, including armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds. Now, the T-55 could at least pretend to be competitive against Western armor.
====2. T-55A (1963)====
*Crew Compartment Armor: Extra armor was added over the crew compartment, aiming to increase survivability in the event of a hit. This was somewhat effective—if you were lucky enough to get hit in the right place.
*Fire Control Improvements: While still primitive by modern standards, fire control upgrades allowed for better target acquisition. If nothing else, the T-55A was becoming better at knowing what it was missing.
*Other Enhancements: Some models were fitted with a mine plow, suggesting that they were well aware of the likely route their armored forces would be taking.
====3. T-55AM/AM2 (1980s)====
*Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA): The T-55AM introduced "Kontakt-1" ERA blocks, adding an extra layer of protection against shaped charges. With ERA, the tank could claim to be "modern" in the same sense that a cassette player is "modern" if you stick a Bluetooth adapter on it.
*Bastion Upgrades: These included enhanced fire control systems, laser rangefinders, and an upgraded 100 mm gun capable of launching ATGMs (Anti-Tank Guided Missiles). Because if you can’t beat modern tanks conventionally, you might as well fling guided projectiles at them.
*Armor Thickness with ERA: Effective armor could exceed 300 mm in some areas, though the engine still struggled to keep pace with the extra weight.
===Licensed Variants and Foreign "Improved" Models===
#Type 59 (China)
#*The Chinese-built T-54 clone that began as an identical copy but later diverged into multiple sub-variants with better fire control, NATO-compatible guns, and even reactive armor
#Tiran 4/5 (Israel)
#*The Tiran series were captured T-54/55s upgraded with Western technology. Modifications included NATO 105 mm guns, better radios, and ERA packages. For captured enemy equipment, these were surprisingly effective, proving that even an old Soviet tank could shine with a little Western love.
==Combat use from Cold War until today==
The T-54 and T-55 tanks are like the cockroaches of the armored warfare world—ugly, outdated, and impossible to kill off. No matter how many times you think you've seen the last of these clunkers, they crawl back into the spotlight, dustier and creakier than ever, ready to participate in yet another conflict like they have some kind of inferiority complex about being left out. So, let’s take a darkly humorous, cynical stroll through their "illustrious" combat record, shall we?
===Hungary 1956:===
The T-54’s grand debut came in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, where Soviet forces thought it would be a brilliant idea to roll these steel coffins into the heart of Budapest to crush a civilian uprising. Sure, they looked terrifying and could flatten buildings, but it turns out tanks don’t do so hot when people are tossing Molotov cocktails at them from apartment windows. Despite being brand-new, the T-54s proved to be giant targets—mobile bonfires, if you will. They were great at "liberating" city streets by reducing them to rubble but not so good at dealing with angry civilians who had a knack for setting them on fire. So much for Soviet invincibility—turns out a bunch of students with homemade bombs could still ruin your day.
===Vietnam:===
Jump to Vietnam, where the T-54 and T-55 rolled into action against the Americans and their oh-so-modern M48 Pattons. On paper, the Pattons should have wiped the floor with these Soviet tin cans, but the jungle had other ideas. In the dense terrain, the Pattons were often like lumbering beasts—slower than a drunk elephant—while the T-55s, as basic and clunky as they were, just kept chugging along. The North Vietnamese crews didn’t need fancy gadgets or top-notch training; they just needed to point and shoot. And the T-55s, like the battlefield cockroaches they are, did their job. Not that it was a glamorous job, but hey, they weren’t out there to win beauty contests—they were out there to outlast. And, as always, they managed to annoy the hell out of a supposedly superior enemy.
===Africa and the Middle East:===
In Africa and the Middle East, the T-55 was like the junker car that every broke college student drives—cheap, beat-up, but somehow still running. These tanks were everywhere. If there was a civil war, a rebellion, or just a good old-fashioned dictatorship, you could bet your bottom dollar that someone was rolling around in a T-55, trying to act tough. They were the go-to tank for anyone with more ambition than budget. When you can’t afford a high-end tank, why not grab a T-55? Who cares if it’s 30 years old and held together with duct tape and prayers? It’s still a tank, right?
In the Yom Kippur War, Syrian T-55s were thrown into battle against Israeli Centurions and M60s, which were basically Ferraris compared to the T-55’s beat-up Ford Pinto. And while the T-55s got blown to bits with depressing regularity, they still managed to show up. The underdog status didn’t make them better, but it sure made them harder to get rid of. Africa saw the same story: T-55s trudging through deserts and savannahs, often crewed by fighters whose "training" amounted to "this is how you turn it on, now good luck."
===Syrian Civil War:===
In the Syrian Civil War, the T-55 has seen action on multiple sides—whether it's the Syrian government forces, various militias, or rebel factions, everyone seems to be getting in on the act. These tanks, some of which are older than the soldiers driving them, are still being used in direct combat. And why not? When you're fighting a war on a shoestring budget and your country is littered with rusting Soviet leftovers, why not dust off a T-55 and throw it into the mix?
Sure, they’ve been “upgraded”—and I use that term generously. Some have slapped on improvised armor or rejigged their targeting systems, but in essence, they’re still the same T-55s that were outdated by the late 20th century. They’ve become like the military equivalent of a classic car: looks good from a distance, but the minute you try to use it, you’re reminded why it belongs in a museum.
In Syria, the T-55’s performance is what you’d expect from a tank that’s been outclassed for decades—it’s tough and relatively easy to maintain, but it’s laughably outgunned by modern standards. Against more modern tanks or, worse yet, precision-guided missiles, it’s a sitting duck. Yet, in the chaotic battlefield of Syria, where everything from small arms to high-tech drones are in play, the T-55 can still be somewhat useful. Its simplicity makes it a workhorse, particularly in low-tech skirmishes, where just having a tank, any tank, can make a difference.
But let’s not kid ourselves—this isn’t the T-55’s glorious return to form. These tanks are mostly surviving out of sheer necessity. They’re being used because Syria has them, not because they’re actually good anymore. They can hold their own in smaller engagements, sure, but every time one of these old hulks goes up against a modern anti-tank weapon, it’s like watching a dinosaur get taken out by a meteor—inevitable and brutal.
===Ukraine:===
Now, over in Ukraine, the T-54 and T-55 have been making a surprise comeback, because apparently Russia’s tank stocks are running lower than expected. In a world where tanks like the T-90 or T-14 Armata are supposed to be the new kings of the battlefield, watching the Kremlin drag out these old dinosaurs is both hilarious and sad. It’s like a bad sequel—no one asked for it, and yet here we are.
The Russians are reportedly digging into their mothballed reserves, dusting off these antique tanks, and sending them off to the front lines. But instead of being used as actual combat tanks, many of them are getting a new job—UEVs (Uncrewed Explosive Vehicles). Essentially, they’re sending these things off without a crew, packed with explosives, hoping they’ll crash into Ukrainian positions and go out in a blaze of glory.
Except it’s not really glory, is it? More like a pathetic whimper as they get blown up by Ukrainian drones long before they reach their targets. These “suicide tanks” barely make it across no-man’s-land before a UAV spots them and vaporizes them in spectacular fashion. It’s a sad end for a tank that was never all that great to begin with.
But hey, with Russian tank stocks dwindling, maybe they’ll have no choice but to actually put T-55s back into service as real tanks. Imagine that—fighting modern wars with equipment that’s been obsolete for decades. It’s almost comical, if it weren’t so grim.
===Conclusion: From Rust Bucket to Bomb on Tracks===
Whether in Syria as mobile bombs or in Ukraine as disposable UEVs, the T-54 and T-55 have truly come full circle—from feared weapons of war to glorified sacrificial lambs. They’ve outlived their usefulness, yet somehow, they keep finding new, ridiculous ways to die. In both conflicts, these tanks are a symbol of desperation, a testament to how low a military force can sink when there’s nothing better left in the arsenal.
So here’s to the T-55: the tank that refuses to go quietly into the night, even if it’s being blown up in the most humiliating ways possible.
==Users==
===Historical Users:===
#Soviet Union: The birthplace of the T-54 and T-55, which became a staple of Soviet armored forces.
#Warsaw Pact Nations:
#*Poland
#*East Germany
#*Czechoslovakia
#*Romania
#*Bulgaria
#Hungary: Notably used by Soviet forces during the 1956 Hungarian Revolution.
#Egypt: Used extensively during the 1956 Suez Crisis, the Six-Day War (1967), and the Yom Kippur War (1973).
#Syria: Deployed in conflicts with Israel during the Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War.
#North Vietnam: Famously used in the Vietnam War, with T-54s and T-55s taking on American M48 Patton tanks.
#Iraq: Used during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) and by Saddam Hussein’s forces during the Gulf War (1990-1991).
#Angola: Deployed in the Angolan Civil War, where various factions used these tanks.
#Cuba: Participated in the Cuban Revolution and later served in conflicts abroad, such as Angola.
#India: Deployed in the Indo-Pakistani wars, including 1971.
#Pakistan: Operated T-55 tanks captured from India in conflicts.
===Contemporary Users:===
#Syria: Still actively used by government forces and militias during the Syrian Civil War.
#Russia: Reportedly bringing old T-55s out of storage due to depleted modern tank stocks, used for both combat and as UEVs (Uncrewed Explosive Vehicles) in the conflict with Ukraine.
#Yemen: Used by both Houthi rebels and government forces in the ongoing civil war.
#Sudan: Deployed in various internal conflicts and by factions in South Sudan.
#Libya: Multiple factions, including militias, are using T-54/T-55 tanks in the ongoing civil war.
#Ethiopia: Used in conflicts such as the Eritrean War of Independence and still part of the inventory today.
#North Korea: Maintains a large number of T-54/T-55 variants in active service.
#Vietnam: Though largely retired from active service, some T-55s are still in storage.
==="Redneck" Militias and Improvised Users:===
#African Rebel Groups: In conflicts across Africa (Liberia, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo), T-55s have found their way into the hands of poorly trained militias and "bush armies" whose maintenance and operational skills are questionable at best.
#Syrian Rebel Groups: In the Syrian Civil War, various poorly equipped militias, some with little formal training, have captured and repurposed T-54/T-55 tanks. They often use them with improvised modifications, including "DIY" armor.
#Libyan Militias: Similar to Syria, numerous factions in the ongoing Libyan Civil War have captured or inherited these tanks, often using them more as mobile artillery pieces or makeshift battering rams than as functional, well-maintained tanks.
Category:Tanks
Category:Tanks
Category:Communism
Category:Sad
Category:Stupidity
pl:T-55