PART ONE

PART ONE
Uploaded to YouTube:
2017-09-28 18:24:01 UTC
"PART ONE" is the first part of John Canales' video series promoting an antisemitic conspiracy theory. The trailer for this video led 
==Transcript==
AFTER UPLOADING "THE JEWISH QUESTION" TRAILER, THAT VIDEO, AND NEARLY HALF OF MY TOTAL UPLOADS WERE DEMONETIZED.
[A three-column listing of the demonetized videos (the first two columns have nine videos and the third has three; the negative above the third, much shorter column is occupied by a YouTube "play" symbol. The videos' thumbnails and titles are displayed with view/comment/like counts (labeled with only a dark-gray barchart icon, speech baloon and thumbs-up icon, respectively) is shown. Beneath these counts, each video has a blue globe (indicating the video can be viewed worldwide) and yellow dollar sign (indicating the video has been demonetized). There are twenty-one videosAs listed in the video:
* The Jewish Question Part 0 (12,715 views/822 comments/967 likes)
* September Patron Stream! (1,567 views/34 comments/65 likes)
* Did PewDiePie Go Too Far? MB TALKS, (8,955 views/359 comments/718 likes)
* How Hbomberguy Lied About My Views & Yours (17,863 views/818 comments/1,452 likes)
* BLM Demands Statue Be Taken Down: A Short Documentary (14,029 views/437 comments/1,421 likes)
* How Stephen Colbert is Helping ANTIFA, (35,682 views/1,127 comments/2,981 likes)
* #charlottesville (27,143 views/1,047 comments/2,100 likes)
* Sam Harris Contradicts Himself on Race & Individualism (13,691 views/846 comments/705 likes)
* My Fascist Friend and I React to Murdoch's Mouthy Buddha VIDEO (38,033 views/1,140 comments/1,143 likes)
* PATRON STREAM: The JQ, Addiction, SJWs, Freedom (2,828 views/79 comments/98 likes)
* This ANTIFA Has PROFOUND Daddy ISSUES (20,091 views/452 comments/2,009 likes)
* An ANTIFA Interview Attempt GOES WRONG (81,393 views/968 comments/2,194 likes)
* MAGA Is But A Dream (8,504 views/293 comments/885 likes)
* Police Remove Man Who Disagrees With Protesters (5,902 views/122 comments/623 likes)
* I interview an ANTIFA who used to be a WHITE SEPARATIST (75,970 views/2,245 comments/1,858 likes)
* Dear Antifa... (56,874 views/1,200 comments/5,076 likes)
* The Islamization Of AMERICA: Coming Soon? (13,736 views/348 comments/1063 likes)
* Angela Merkel: Islam's Pet Dog (2,781 views/61 comments/193 likes)
* Do We Still Need Feminism? (5,705 views/104 comments/358 likes)
* SJW's: How They Will Destroy The World (5,974 views/91 comments/453 likes)
* Are You Offended By This? Anti-SJW (22,187 views/279 comments/1,405 likes)
 in all.]
WARNING
THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED DURING THIS SERIES DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF MOUTHY BUDDHA
THIS SERIES WILL BE AN ATTEMPT TO REPRESENT ALL SIDES AS ACCURATELY AND AS FAIRLY AS POSSIBLE
THIS IS NOT INTENDED TO CONDONE HATRED OR VIOLENCE
THIS IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
A SERIES FROM MOUTHY BUDDHA
IN COLLABORATION WITH CDR ROCKWELL'S GHOST
IN COLLABORATION WITH BRAVING RUIN
IN COLLABORATION WITH DAVID G. -ISRAELI JEW-
THE JEWISH QUESITON
Canales: Many of you have reached out to me annoyed at what I'm doing, and if I could sum up the criticism generally, it would sound something like this: "Why are you doing this?" Why get into this topic at all? Anti-Semitism is one of the most brutal and horrific notions in human civilization. Why not make more of your music? Why not talk about spirituality or introspection? Because the fact that you're addressing this topic at all says more about you than anything that could be said about the Jewish people or the Jewish religion, and seeing you get lured into this trap is disturbing. What the fuck is wrong with you? To those of you listening who also occupy this criticism, I understand. But I'm not making this to stir up anti-Semitism. Please let me ask you a question: Am I allowed to say anything about Judaism or Israel or Jewish culture or even individual Jews themselves without sounding like an anti-Semite, and if so, why is that the case? Given that on this channel, I talk about white people, and black people, and Asian people all the time, why is discussing the Jewish people, in a general way, or in the same way one might discuss black crime or Asian IQ rates or white guilt, different? Because it shouldn't be. But I know that it is
[Audio clips of two political commentators are played over images of news articles]
Kyle Kulinski: A German court sentenced an 87-year-old grandma to ten months in jail for denying the Holocaust. 
Announcer: That YouTube star, PewDiePie, who were dropped by Disney for anti-Semitism, I think there's a development there...
Canales: I acknowledge that this topic is mired in historical sensitivity, but god forbid I talk about a subject that, for better or worse, surrounds the Internet political subcultures we inhabit. And the idea of just burying it in the sand or pretending like it's not worthy of conversation is absurd; so I ask for your patience, and an open mind, as my intention is to present both sides as best my biased mind can, and to leave the rest up to you. That said, what is the Jewish Question?
PART 1
Canales: The Jewish Question is the belief that a preeminent influential force resides within the world's banks, governments and media corporations, and that those who dominate these institutions are Jewish leaders, most of whom hold interests that are antithetical to the West, with many favoring policies and influencing politicians who push for open borders and multiculturalism in the West while simultaneously funding programs that maintain Jewish homogeneity in Israel. One aspect of the JQ insists that Judaism is a religious system dedicated to achieving dominion over the goyim, or non-Jew, through coveted means, and say evidence for this claim rests in the Talmud, which is the primary source of Jewish religious law, with verses saying, quote, "even the best of the goyim should be killed". Many who ask the Jewish question are asking: should any small group that makes up less than two percent of the population have majority influence and control of that population? Starting with the U.S., the evidence one provides to substantiate the JQ is as follows: Ashkenazi Jews make up 90% of the Jewish population in the U.S., and according to the U.S. Census Bureau, Jews make up between 1.7 percent to 2.6 percent of the entire population. Here's the question: how many Jewish CEOs of major media corporations or owners of financial institutions or Hollywood production companies are there, and is this number reflective of a group that holds around 2 percent of the United States population? The answer is Jews are drastically overrepresented in positions of power. Abraham Foxman, national director of the ADL; Jeff Zucker, president of CNN; Robert Greenblatt, chairman of NBC; Rupert Murdoch, chairman and CEO of Fox News; Summer Rothstein, chairman of Viacom; Henry Kissinger, former U.S. Secretary of State; Robert Zoellick, former president of the World Bank; Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006; Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2014; Janet Yellen, the current chairman of the Federal Reserve; Lloyd Blankfein, chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs; Mark Zuckerburg, owner of Facebook; Larry Page, founder of Google and now the owner of YouTube; Gary Barber, CEO of MGM; Robert Iger, chairman and CEO of Disney; Michael Lynton, chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures; Brad Grey, chairman of Paramount Pictures; Leslie Moonves, chief executive of CBS; Harry Sloan, MGM chairman; Harvey Weinstein, co-chair of the Weinstein Company. I really could go on and on and on. Because the amount of Jews who own the most powerful banking and media companies in the world is stunning. Control over banks yields control over currency. Control overy currency yields control over media corporations. Control over the media yields control over the government, and control over the government yields control over the people. 
THE OTHER SIDE
Canales: But a common rebuke to this is as follows: these facts on their own say nothing of importance. Just because Jews are overrepresented in positions of influence says nothing about their intentions or their motives. In fact, one need only look at the average IQ rates of Ashkenazi Jews for a simple answer to all of this. Ashkenazi Jews are the smartest people in the world. Therefore, in any society they end up in, they are more able to climb the ranks of our capitalistic ladders and become successful. And for people who value free markets, one would think you would appreciate the rapid success of the Jewish people in America, not to mention the fact that most of these Jews who own banks or own media corporations are atheists who have nothing to do with their so-called "goy-hating" religion, or their culture, and are obviously fully assimilated to the West. Think of people like Steven Pinker or Sam Harris, or Gad Saad or Albert Einstein. Or comedians like Andy Samberg or Judd Apatow and Adam Sandler, people who obviously are a threat to no one, who have no secret agenda of Jewish dominance. Also, too often, the people who criticize Jews for being tribal, or having strong ingroup preferences, are the kind of people who wish for their own race to be just as tribalistic. And I haven't even mentioned all the libertarian Jews, like Milton Friedman, or Ayn Rand, or Ben Shapiro, or Dennis Prager, Jews who obviously love America and the values they represent. The truth is, Jews are smart, and they work together. Therefore, they are successful. It really is that simple. But many who see credence in the JQ respond to this critique by fully acknowledging the IQ disparity among Jews and all other races as a factor in Jewish success. Of course Jews are smarter than most of us. And this is part of the problem. But the bigger point is that Jewish influence in the West is not predicated on all Jews believing the same thing. There are obvious exceptions to every rule. But the exceptions, meaning the Jews who don't care that they're Jewish, or who seem to have no semblance of Jewish identity, says nothing about all the Jews in power who do. That said, some would claim that many of these so-called exceptions that were previously listed to debunk the JQ, are in fact full of tribal ingroup preferences. Judd Apatow, for example, with the exception of Steve Carell, has given all his starring roles to his fellow Jews. Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill, Jason Schwartzman, Sarah Silverman, Andy Dick, Paul Rudd, Jason Segel. Also, Sam Harris, Gad Saad, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Milton Friedman, and Ayn Rand are all pro-Israel, with Albert Einstein even donating to Zionist groups. But many JQers don't necessarily say this ingroup bias is a bad thing. If anything, they applaud it, and do in fact wish that many within their ingroup will live the same way. The argument is that obviously Jews represent a plurality of views, but their ingroup bias, no matter how mundane, is more sinister, calculated, and clever than others, claiming there is something inherent in Jewish identity, an identity mired in the Talmud, an identity mired in a culture continually forced into surviving by any means necessary, that makes it more problematic, overtly selfish and dishonest, giving rise to troublesome behaviors which have been mirrored and repeated in every society they travel to, and immediately get kicked out of -- something that will be expanded on in part two. But what exactly are Jewish interests? And how (or even, do) they differ from Americna interests? How many times exactly have Jews been kicked out of societies, and are they being removed solely because of jealousy and irrational fear? Is anti-Semitism the real problem? Does this reoccuring phenomenon of Jews having so much trouble throughout history have more to say about us or them? Or is it a mixture of both? All of this and more in part two.
THE JEWISH QUESTION PT. 2
COMING SOON...
THIS CHANNEL IS FUNDED ENTIRELY BY YOU
CONSIDER PLEDGING A DOLLAR ON PATREON
MUSIC BY:
DEATH VALLEY OASIS - D33J
CLINT MANSELL - THE FOUNTAIN THEME
SHALT - WARM CHAOS
==Notes==