Anna de Buisseret

Annamarie Harvey de Buisseret also known as Anna de Buiscuit (D 2024Mark Playne, "The Sad Loss of a Hero of the Freedom Movement", Not on the Beeb) was a non-practising, "confused," and "just wrong" solicitorAnnamarie Harvey de Buisseret Solicitors Regulation Authority with multiple misunderstandings of English case lawBell v Tavistock case is unrelated to vaccines for children (September 28, 2021) Reuters turned antivax activist, whose legal advice was described by experts as "false," "seriously misleading," and "errant nonsense."Anti-vaxxer launches nonsense rant that vaccines are 'murdering our children' by James Cheng-Morris (August 31, 2021) Yahoo! News
==Taking de Buiscuit==
De Buisseret came to prominence in July 2021, making the unsubstantiated claims to bemused-looking police officers outside an NHS vaccine centre that, stating, "We are a common law jurisdiction, [the vaccines] are causing harm. It’s against the law to cause harm and it’s also a duty to prevent harm from happening." And quickly escalating to claiming, "For the public record these [vaccines] are not legal, that’s precisely why we are here. They constitute crimes against humanity, they are bioweapons on the evidence that this is a eugenics programme, it’s genocide."
De Buisseret returned to the spotlight, following the expansion of the vaccine roll out to over-12s, in a video endorsed by celebrity contrarians Gillian "awful poo lady" McKeith and Waving an entirely unrelated high court ruling in the face of another bemused police officer outside of another NHS vaccination centre while demanding he think of the children:
Demanding to see the manager, she went on to state:
Following the overturning of the judgment by the Court of Appeal, de Buisseret maintained:
In September 2021, de Buisseret was part of an antivax brain trust, including Dolores Cahill, obstetrician turned ivermectin pusher Tess Lawrie, clottish funeral director John O'Looney, retired policeman turned sovereign citizen Mark Sexton, suspended GP turned holistic practitioner Sam White, and former Pfizer pharmacologist turned antivax activist which met with a “senior” Tory MP, said to have been head of the Sir to call for the COVID-19 vaccine rollout to be paused “as a matter of urgency” and for those vaccines to “at no point” be given to children. Brady, while not confirming the meeting had taken place, clarified that if it had, it would not amount to an endorsement of their views.Covid antivaxers ‘met senior Conservative MP’ Sir Graham Brady by Tom Whipple (September 30, 2021) The Sunday Times (archived September 30, 2021)Senior Tory MP Sir Graham Brady ‘met with anti-vaxxers’ by Zoe Tidman (September 30, 2021) The Independent
==Biting de Buiscuit==
In an email response to Reuters, de Buisseret challenged fact checkers to prove it “factually incorrect to state that both domestic and international laws are being broken here in the UK,” so they did and have continued to do so.
===International law===
The British Institute of Human Rights says that while enforced vaccination would be a violation of human rights, voluntary vaccination protects the right to life and to be safe from serious harm. Furthermore, vaccines and medicines are routinely monitored as they are rolled out en masse, and this does not mean that they are experimental or untested. Therefore, their administration does not constitute crimes against humanity or genocide as de Buisseret claimed.
===Domestic law===
The COVID-19 vaccines have been tested, licensed and monitored to ensure “the highest standards of safety are met and maintained” in accordance with UK law by the (MHRA). Severe side effects have been shown to be extremely rare, undermining the assumption of harm upon which de Buisseret's legal argument rests.
Law professor Michael Thomson of the University of Technology Sydney and University of Leeds, maintains: 
"She's just wrong," responded barrister to her comments about children being unable to give informed consent for vaccination, continuing:
Barrister Bianca Jackson added:
De Buisseret seemed confused about Bell v Tavistock, concluded Jackson, stating:
Law professor Suzanne Ost of Lancaster University responded to de Buisseret's use of the Bell v Tavistock judgement:
“Bell and Tavistock was about a very different scenario to the vaccine," concluded Wagner, "Waving a copy of a legal case and very inaccurately describing [it] does not count as the law."
 law firm told Reuters that regulation of medicines and vaccines, in which they specialise, is “complex” and requires “a very high degree of legal specialism”. “Without clear evidence of such expertise," they added, "we urge anyone who comes across such claims to report the post to the social media operator concerned.”
==See also==
*Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland — fellow British antivax solicitors.
==References==
Category:Anti-vaccination movement
Category:British people
Category:COVID-19 denialists
category:pseudolaw