Interstat/Issues 061-070

<splist
 parent=Interstat
 showparent=no
 sort=asc
 sortby=title
 liststyle=bar
 showpath=notparent
 kidsonly=no
 debug=0
/>
==Issue 61==
Interstat 61 was published in November 1982 and contains 18 pages.
* art by Sat Nam Kaur Keahey, Ann Crouch
* Judith Gran addresses the letter from Syn Ferguson in the last issue and discusses profit and fair use: 
* Crystal Ann Taylor is a little resentful of fandom having to clean up a mess: 
* Lynna Bright proposes that Harve Bennett is not a fan of Star Trek: 
* Debbie G addresses something new in fandom, the ability to watch films somewhat "on demand": 
* Mary Lou Drach writes: 
* Don H addresses Barbara P. Gordon, and among other things, "accuses" her of being a fan of K/S: 
* Mark C. H wants to know about Star Trek and religion: 
==Issue 62==
Interstat 62 was published in December 1982 and contains 18 pages.
* contains no interior art
* the editor writes an Open Letter, called Where No Producers Have Gone Before, see that page
* Debbie G addresses Mark H's question about religion in Star Trek: 
* Bev C also addresses Mark H: 
* France F addresses Mark H and religion in ST: 
* Ruth Berman also addresses religion and ST: 
* Bev C comments on an earlier letter about Kirk not ever getting married 
* Bev L answers Mary Lou D's question of Kirk and lack of matrimony: 
* Kay K. D says of the movie: 
* Barbara P. G holds firm on her opinion about the movie: 
* Cathi B says about Spock staying dead: 
* Bev L comments on the movie and its lack of subtlety: 
* Bev C agrees that ST fans are "born nit-pickers": 
==Issue 63==
Interstat 63 was published in January 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* contains no interior art
* there is a progress report for the next MediaWest*Con
* Mary Lou Dodge, Leslie Fish and Ken Gooch are no longer listed as columnists
* Dawn Law comments on the current discussion topic of religion in Star Trek: 
* Bev L has some observations and advice: 
* Jan M. M apolgizes to another fan, Michele A: 
* Dawn Law writes of canon and acceptance of flaws: 
* Lynna Bright explains her views on the Kirk in the movie: 
* Cathy B addresses the open letter Teri Meyer wrote in the last issue: 
* Sonni Cooper writes a goodbye: 
* Deborah L. B sees an upswing in Trek zines: 
* Barbara P. Gordon addresses Linda S: 
* D. Booker addresses the question of Kirk and religion: 
==Issue 64==
Interstat 64 was published in February 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* contains no interior art
* Eric A. Stillwell addresses Joan M. Verba: 
* Linda S comments about Trek and religion: 
* Debbie G addresses Ruth Berman and Dawn Law's letters which in turn addressed religion in Star Trek: 
* Lisa W writes of religion and Star Trek: 
* Lynda C addresses D. Booker's comments on religion: 
* Mark C. H addresses D. Booker's comments: 
* Joan M. Verba addresses the subject of canon: 
* another view of "real" from Linda S: 
* more on canon, this time from Gloria-Ann Rovelstad: 
* Daniel W isn't for gimmicks: 
* Linda S addresses Don H: 
* Lisa W doesn't have a problem with nit-picking: 
* Don H on nit-picking: 
* Terry S speculates on a 1983 reality if it had happened that Star Trek was never created: 
==Reactions and Reviews: Issue 64==
==Issue 65==
Interstat 65 was published in March 1983 and contains 22 pages.
 
* Tim F writes: 
* Bev L addresses Barbara P. G: 
* Linda S tells Pat K: 
* a fan tells another: 
* Frances F has an issue with age: 
* two German fans, Susanne & Franziska D, are happy to have Interstat: 
* Eric A. Stillwell addresses Randall L: 
* Lisa W writes of Spock's possible return to life: 
* Don H offers this opinion: 
* there are a few reviews of the pro book, "Black Fire," and they are negative; one excerpt from S. L. R: 
* Bev L writes of the movie: 
* Debbie G points out: 
==Issue 66==
Interstat 66 was published in April 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* Ruth Berman addresses a letter in an earlier issue, one that speculates on a world where Star Trek had never been created: 
* Tom A writes of Spock's death: 
* Barbara R questions the idea of canon: 
* Kathy C writes a long letter commenting on what is canon and compares it to Sherlock Holmes: 
* Mark M comments about the letterzine itself: 
* Lynna Bright comments on the movie: 
* Bobbie Hawkins writes of the movie: 
* the last few issues have had much discussion about a fan club; one fan writes: 
* Don H addresses Eric S: 
* Bobbie Hawkins finds the feedback of the pro novel, "Black Fire" by a fan in a previous issue to be exceedingly harsh, and asks the editor to exercise some of her power: 
* another fan, Linda S, comments on pro books: 
* Tom A writes of "Black Fire": 
* Lisa W and Julia E write about the quality of pro books: 
* Don H doesn't like this letterzine plugging another show: 
* Gail P. E gives a history lesson, and a "boot-in-the-ass speech": 
* an example of fannish discourse: 
* another example of fannish discourse: 
* Dawn Law pleads for civility: 
==Issue 67==
Interstat 67 was published in May 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* art by Mike Verina and Sat Nam Kaur Keahey
* Teresa C would like more variety, and the editor explains: 
* Shirley Maiewski explains some things about the STW: 
* Lisa W explains a term: 
* Larry N writes of continuity: 
* Mark C. H comments on the show, memories, elevation of opinion and more: 
* Colleen C comments on the many fans who are discussing the use of, and lack of, realistic science in the ST movies: 
* Anne E. Batterby liked the pro book, "Black Fire": 
* Lisa W on "Black Fire": 
* Frances F comments on "Black Fire": 
* Suzanne M writes about "Black Fire": 
* Debbie G writes of the fan campaign that was suggested regarding Timescape Books: 
* Joan Verba writes of pro books in general: 
* an apology! -- Mark C. H writes: 
* Judith H suggests another topic of discussion: 
* Sylvia K would like an official fan club: 
* Debbie G thanks Interstat's editor: 
* Lisa W on Interstat's editorial policy: 
* Bev L comments on this letterzine's editorial policy: 
* Lisa W addresses Ruth Berman's earlier letter about SF and ST fandom: 
* Bev L brings up the topic of fans making copies of fanzines: 
* Shirley Maiewski writes of the changes and blessings she has seen: 
==Issue 68==
Interstat 68 was published in June 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* it contains no interior art
* this issue has piece of commentary from Teri Meyer called Minefield in which she discusses the leak and sale of a script outline for the third Star Trek movie, see that page
* S.L. R comments on Interstat's editorial policy: 
* Mary Ann Drach comments on editorial policy and addresses Bobbie H: 
* Daniel W offers an apology to a fan: 
* Debbie G doesn't want an official Star Trek fan club: 
* Barbara P. Gordon is glad not to have an official fan club either: 
* Carol F bemoans the lack of LoCs and communication: 
* J. Elizabeth G writes of Trek reading material: 
* more on a previous comment on "Black Fire" and of pro books in general from Mary Ann D: 
* Lisa W comments on pro books: 
* Carol F comments on pro books: 
* Dorothy L has an issue with division and vocabulary: 
* Debbie G comments on LoCers: 
* Cindy MaC writes: 
* Carol C wishes for more Chapel in a zine: 
* S.L. R offers up an explanation, and an apology that really isn't, about "Black Fire": 
* Mary Ann Drach takes what she can from Trek's inconsistencies: 
* Carol F addresses Bev L: 
* B. J. Gordon writes: 
* Mary Ann Drach would like to see way less conflict in this letterzine: 
==Issue 69==
Interstat 69 was published in July 1983 and contains 18 pages.
* there is no interior art
* this issue has a long comment by a fan who really enjoyed reading the pro book Web of the Romulans, see that page
* there are many comments about Association for Readable TREK and Minefield, see those pages
* Howard Weinstein tells fans that if they abide by the fan-proposed boycott of pro books, Association for Readable TREK, they will miss out on a new pro book by Ann Crispin called "Yesterday's Son": 
* Maria V is looking for fan fiction: 
* Trina M. A also buys the pro books out of desperation: 
* Brett B comments on "Black Fire," the pro book: 
* Judith Gran addresses two fans, Carol F and Bev L, on copyright and profit: 
==Issue 70==
Interstat 70 was published in August 1983 and contains 22 pages.
* there is no interior art
* there is a ballot for TrekStar Awards #3
* there are many comments about the pro book boycott proposal, see Association for Readable TREK for those
* there are comments about the leaked script controversy, see Minefield for those
* there is an announcement that fan, Carol Becker, has passed away, her friend Jan M. M writes: 
* Margaret A. M comments on another fan's comments: 
* Linda S speculates on Vulcan sexuality: 
* Sally F addresses comments by Mary Lou D in an earlier issue: 
* Tony L. W. also addresses Mary Lou D's comments: 
* Lucia J comments on pro books: 
* Gennie Summers comments on pro books: 
* Melissa M comments on pro books: 
* Daniel W comments on pro books: 
* Barbara P. Gordon addresses Harve Bennett: 
* Linda S addresses Judith G about fans' script approval: 
* Barbara P. Gordon addresses Judith G about fans' script approval: 
* Jean Lorrah has news: 
* Eric A. Stillwell addresses Interstat's editor: 
* Gennie Summers writes of a zine (unnamed) review that she found hurtful: 
* Vel Jaeger addresses Alice J. M about a previous letter: 
* Eric A. Stillwell tells another fan, Astra, that it was smart to read Interstat for seven months before writing a letter: 
* Carol F addresses a letter in an earlier issue by Judith G about zines and copyright: 
* Judith Gran writes a letter on copyright: 
* Barbara P. Gordon has these comments regarding why more fans don't write LoCs: 
==References==
Category:Star Trek TOS Non-fiction Zines
Category:Star Trek TNG Zines
Category:1982 Zines
Category:1983 Zines
Category:Spirituality & Fandom