nyuuzyou/wikis huggingface dataset:
Wolf

*The pre-domesticated version of a dog
*Werewolves, monstrous wolf creatures in folklore and cryptozoology
*Wolf hysteria, widespread panic caused by fear and hatred of normal wolves
*Women's Liberation Front (WoLF), an astroturf "radfem" organisation with connections to conservative lobbying groups
* Danny Wolf, an American alt-right activist
*"Lone wolf", an informal term for a terrorist who acts alone
Women's Violence Prevention Act (South Korea)

The Women's Violence Prevention Act (여성폭력방지기본법) is a South Korean law to punish violence against women and to prevent all violence related to women. The law was passed by the National Assembly of Korea in December 2018 and will go into effect on December 25, 2019.
The bill was proposed by the Minjoo Party and passed with overwhelming support from LKP lawmakers.
==Criticism== 
Article 3 of the Bill defines 'women's violence' as "성별에 기반한 여성에 대한 폭력으로-" (violence based on a gender named woman). The law therefore excludes violence against people assigned male at birth and trans people.
So... cisgender men and transgender people are not protected by this law. It's not because of gender violence, but because it only punishes violence against cisgender women.
The passing of this law has prompted some young men in their 20s to support the Western MRA and alt-right movements. Also, LGBT folks who supported the Minjoo Party withdrew their support and came to support the Justice Party.
==See also==
* Moonbat
* Regressive left
* Trans-exclusionary radical feminism
* Transphobia
* LGBT rights
* Misandry — It's not a delusion like the MRA, but it's really institutional male discrimination.
* Gender binary
==External link==
*국가법령정보센터 (National Statutory Information Center) — 여성폭력방지기본법 (Women's Violence Prevention Act) Full text (in Korean)
==Note==
Category:Sexism
Category:Transphobia
Category:South Korean law
Category:South Korean politics
Women (sura)

The Women (An-Nisa) is the fourth sura of the Qu'ran. And surprise surprise, it ain't no feminist tract.
The sura says that sons should inherit twice as much as daughters Allah enjoins you concerning your children: The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females, Women:11; and states that if women are found to be "guilty of lewdness", the correct punishment is to "confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them." Luckily, a whopping four men are required to witness this lewdness and testify on it. () 
At the same time, you are not to just take things away from women, not take them against their will. ()
Though women are property, nowhere in this Sura does it advocate dismembering much less honor killings, regardless of the "Qu'ranic justification" supposedly offered for those acts.
Women are as unclean as using the restroom: …do not go near prayer… if you are sick, or on a journey, or one of you come from the privy or you have touched the women ().
The Women allows polygamy though only where the husband's demeanor and finances allow him to care for all those he marries and their children (). The Women also contains instructions on exchanging one wife for another, as long as you provide for the first in proper gold and steal nothing from her. ()
One verse of the sura was quoted by Osama bin Laden in his letter to America following 9/11:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver
The sura contains discussions of Jesus and his human nature (as opposed to the supernatural sense that Christians claim), and establishes that the Crucifixion was faked: "and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, though it appeared to them so… But Allah took him up unto Himself. Allah was ever Mighty, Wise." ()
==See also==
*RationalWiki:Annotated Qur'an ()
*Qur'an
*Qur'anic scientific foreknowledge
*Qur'anic scientific errors
*Qur'anic contradictions
*List of actions prohibited by the Qur'an
==Notes==
==References==
Category:Suras
Word magic

Word magic is a logical fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that an entity exists, because the word for it exists.
The fallacy is a form of mistaking the map for the territory and an informal fallacy.
==Explanation==
There are words for God, reptoids, the NWO, unicorns, Klingons, faeries, the FSM, UFOs, the Celestial Teapot, and Bigfoot. Are they all real?
Oh, you want a little more detail? Okay. The fact that a word has been invented merely means that the concept that word represents is conceivable by the human mind — in other words, that it is possible to imagine the existence of that thing. It does not necessarily mean that the thing which embodies that concept actually exists. The word "dog" represents nothing more or less than the concept of a dog. However, dogs exist, and their existence is readily observable by just about anybody. The word "god" represents nothing more or less than the concept of a god. However, humanity has not yet found any way to observe the existence of a god, nor has it found a way to completely disprove the possibility that a god exists; no gods have ever made contact with humans in a way that is unambiguously a communication from a god (rather than a non-god entity or a simple delusion), nor has any technology developed by humans been able to find any evidence for or against the existence of a god. Given that gods are by definition supernatural entities (which, by definition, means that they are not explainable by science), it is highly unlikely that the existence of a god will ever be definitively proved or disproved.
==See also==
*Appeal to consequences
*Essentialism
*Etymological fallacy
*Mistaking the map for the territory
*Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
*Wishful thinking
*Word magic is not to be confused with Max Tegmark's ultimate ensemble hypothesis, which holds that anything that can be mathematically defined and is computable exists. "Word magic" does not require the concept named to be logically consistent, so it is a fallacy.
==External links==
*Logical Fallacy of Word Magic, SeekFind.net — unintentional examples of fallacious uses of word magic, i.e., fundamentalist Christian confusion about the difference between scientific terminology and word magic
*Word Magic, W. WARD FEARNSIDE & WILLIAM B. HOLTHER
*word magic, Philosophy in Action
*Word Magic, Logically Fallacious
==References==
__NOTOC__
Category:Informal fallacies
Category:Pseudolinguistics
Word of Faith Fellowship

Word of Faith Fellowship is a Pentecostal congregation in Spindale, North Carolina, run by Jane Whaley. According to the Associated Press, it is run like a gulag, with Whaley dictating every aspect of congregants' lives.Mitch Weiss, AP Exclusive: Ex-congregants reveal years of ungodly abuse. sfgate.com via the Associated Press, 26 February 2017. Group members were afraid to leave because Whaley, whom they considered a prophet, warned they would be struck dead by God if they did.
Whaley's distinctive teaching is that people routinely become infested by demons, who can only be banished by physically beating them out of the person. Thus, severe beatings, including of children and babies, are commonplace, yet members are forbidden to seek outside medical help. The group also ran a school, one wing of which was used as a de facto prison, where "rebellious" men and boys would be held for up to a year.
Former members have accused the Whaley of coercing members to commit fraud by filing false unemployment claims in order to keep funds flowing into the church starting with the Great Recession.Church stoked tithing with unemployment scam, ex-members say by Mitch Weiss & Holbrook Mohr (September 25, 2017 at 8:33 AM) The Washington Post.
==External links==
*Official website
*Profile at the Cult Education Institute
*Guide for new members… DON'T
*A World Without Devils – Moving on from a Christian Cult by Jill Evans
*Church members charged with beating gay man (December 15, 2014, 12:40 PM)
==See also==
*Kenneth Hagin — founder of the Word of Faith Movement, from which Whaley's church is derived
==References==
Category:Christianity
Category:Cults
Workers Revolutionary Party

The Workers Revolutionary Party is a British Trotskyist party founded in 1973 by . It was perhaps best known in the 1970s and 80s as the political home of actors Corin and Vanessa Redgrave, as well as some more minor British celebrities.
Healy was expelled from the party in 1989 following allegations of party members being physically assaulted and raped, and indecent ties between the party and Arab dictators. Specifically, in 1983 the BBC found that the party had taken £1.5 million from Colonel Gadaffi's government and that its paper, Newsline, had written approvingly of Saddam Hussein. In October 2011 the party's website declared that Gadaffi "died a hero".
Bob Pitt of Islamophobia Watch is a former member.http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2005/10/22/bob-pitt-watch.html
==Philosophy==
Some awful writings on philosophy (exhibiting deepity, technobabble and sciencey) were attributed to Healy though there is doubt over whether he wrote them or just used Michael Banda's writings:
===Cognition===
Chris Bailey observed:
Another commentator observes:
== The cult of WRP ==
The extreme left took itself very seriously in 1970s and 1980s Britain (although nobody else did, much). Nowhere was this more apparent than in the WRP which demanded cult-like commitment from its members. Journalist and former teenage member Gary Younge wrote:
==External links==
*Their rather garish website
==References==
Category:Communist political parties
Category:British political parties
Category:Far-left political parties
Workers World Party

The Workers World Party is an incredibly weird Marxist splinter group that split from the Socialist Workers Party in 1959. The points of contention were the SWP's opposition to the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956 and to the excesses of the Mao regime. While it still considered itself Trotskyist for a brief period after the split, it soon referred to itself as Marxist-Leninist. They have since gone down the loony path of embracing corruption and brutality the world over as long as it is not done under the authority of western capitalist power. If you're a corrupt, brutal despot with the right credentials, the WWP is gonna love ya! 
==International Honor Roll==
* Supported the Soviet invasion of Hungary (of course).
* Supported Mao's , which led to millions of Chinese starving.
* Supported the Chinese invasion of Tibet.
* Supported the Chinese Cultural Revolution. By the late 1960s, they were just acting like good little Maoists.
* Supported the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
* Supported the crackdown in Tiananmen Square, even though by that time, they regarded the Chinese government as "reactionary." Just fun seeing those tanks rolling and showing those pesky students who's boss, huh?
* Sang the praises of Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il as great revolutionary leaders while the starvation and repression of their subjects were well known. Unknown attitude towards Kim Jong-un.
* Sang the praises of Slobodan Milošević of Serbia as an anti-imperialist leader (WTF?).
* Sang the praises of Saddam Hussein of Iraq as an anti-imperialist leader (WTF?).
* Sang the praises of Muammar al-Gaddafi of Libya as an anti-imperialist leader (WTF?).
* Sang the praises of Bashar al-Assad of Syria as an anti-imperialist leader (WTF?).
* Sang the praises of Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus as an anti-imperialist leader (WTF?)
==But even a stopped clock is right twice a day…==
WWP organized the first demonstration against US involvement in Vietnam, in 1962.
The WWP front group, Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER), was at the forefront of organizing the first demonstrations against the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. They expressed a groundswell of opposition to that war that left the heads of the spineless Democrats who supported the war spinning. Fortunately, the relationship between ANSWER and the group that praised Saddam Hussein as an anti-imperialist leader was never disseminated by the mainstream media.
==References==
Category:Communism
Category:United States political parties
Category:Far-left political parties
WorldTruth.TV

WorldTruth.TV is a webshite run by a man called Eddie Levin,http://www.emailsherlock.com/emailsearch/eddie2769@hotmail.com/ who claims to have "spent the last 32 years researching Theosophy, Freemasonry, Kabbalah, Rosicrucianism, the Bavarian Illuminati and Western Occultism,"http://worldtruth.tv/aboutus/ which should immediately tip you off that everything on this site is utter bullshit (just in case the title didn't). Newsguard says that the webshite "severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency".worldtruth.tv, newsguardtech.com, May 2020. The site promotes such harebrained ideas as:
* "Cleansing" dietshttp://worldtruth.tv/32-detox-drinks-for-cleansing-and-weight-loss/
* Global warming denialismhttp://worldtruth.tv/global-warming-debunked/
* Antivax bullshithttp://worldtruth.tv/courts-quietly-confirm-mmr-vaccine-causes-autism%E2%80%8F/
* And most importantly, antisemitism, claiming that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is an authentic manual on how Jews are going to take over the world (rather than the crock that it really is).https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20120314015257/http://worldtruth.tv:80/the-protocols-of-the-learned-elders-of-zion
==References==
Category:Antisemitism
Category:Anti-vaccination movement
Category:Conspiracy theorists
Category:Crank magnetism
Category:Fake news
Category:Global warming denialists
Category:Internet
Category:Misnomers
Category:Pseudoscience promoters
World Socialist Party of the United States

The World Socialist Party of the United States (WSPUS) is a socialist political organization established in Detroit, Michigan as the Socialist Party of the United States in 1916 and which operated as the Socialist Educational Society in the 1920s and later the Workers' Socialist Party. The organization is the American companion party of the World Socialist Movement.
The WSPUS defines socialism as a moneyless society based on common ownership of the means of production, production for use, and social relations based on cooperative and democratic associations instead of bureaucratic hierarchies. Additionally, the WSPUS considers statelessness, classlessness, and the complete abolition of wage labor to be components of a socialist society, traits which are usually reserved to describe fully developed communism.
==Religion==
==Economics==
==Society==
===Cooperation===
==See also==
*Socialist Party of Great Britain
==External links==
*Official site
Category:Communism
Category:United States political parties
Category:Far-left political parties
World War III

World War III denotes another hypothetical world war, typically imagined as a way more devastating, nuclear one than any war ever fought previously. The numbering naturally follows from World War II, though any WW3 clearly hasn't happened just yet. The idea crops up in a number of books — for example: General The Third World War: August 1985 (1978), or Richard Nixon's The Real War (1980) — mostly written during the Cold War period.
==In fiction and speculation==
The common theme in speculation about a Third World War often involved "the West" fighting the Soviet Union, with the Soviets often having the initial upper hand (taking their presentation of military capacity at face value), at least until the nukes started falling. In post-Cold War examples, which evoke a "Clash of Civilizations" approach, the Western world is often threatened by Islamic terrorism or by China or perhaps Iran or India as the emerging superpowers of the early twenty-first century.
Despite the collapse of the Soviet Union, none of the authors of predictive WWIII books issued a retraction/an explanation of why their predictions were wrong. 
Nuclear weaponry is often most associated with the concept of WWIII. This has led to a lot of post-apocalyptic science fiction. The sheer scale of a nuclear world war has led numerous authors (as well as Albert Einstein) to quip that the fourth world war would be fought with sticks and stones, in reference to the devastation WWIII would bring about.
==Real WWIII?==
There are some schools of thought that say that World War III isn't hypothetical but is very, very real. Some speculate that the Cold War was in fact WWIII, while others describe the War on Terror as WWIII — as both are essentially global, although feature less attrition than the previous two world wars. In cases where people think both count, that makes the War on Terror actually World War IV. Defining what would constitute a "World War" is actually difficult, as the term was only in use from the Second World War onwards — the "First" World War was often referred to even as late as the 1930s as "The European War" or "The Great War," a phrasing that can still be found on many war memorials. The Napoleonic Wars that preceded both (and the earlier ) could also be included as "world" wars given their scale and duration.
Recently, paranoia and speculation over the likelihood of nuclear war and World War III reignited, in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 disaster, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia. The Russian intervention in Syria since 2016, and the in April 2017, created more paranoia and speculation to an extent that British tabloid newspapers, who gave voice to doomsday predictions (such as Nostradamus), unsurprisingly covered it.For example: 
==See also==
*WWI
*WWII
*Nuclear war
==References==
category:War
Category:End of the world
World report on violence and health

In 2002, the World Health Organization published its World report on violence and health in which it collated statistics from around the world on serious violent crimes, the first time that such a comprehensive exercise has been carried out. 
In particular, the report looked at deaths caused by violence and goes into some detail on the different types of violence and the people committing such crimes. For example, violence caused by intimate partners, child abuse, and sexual violence are each covered in the various chapters.
The report itself is lengthy and detailed and has some interesting statistics amongst its many tables of figures. These are not the sorts of figures that are likely to be reported by American conservative organizations, as they make uncomfortable reading for anyone advocating gun ownership.
==Death by intentional injury==
Of the 77 countries for which statistics were taken for death by intentional injury, the US was 29th, with 17.4 deaths per 100,000 of the population. This is considerably short of Colombia (65.1 deaths per 100,000), Russia (53.7), Cuba (23.5), but poor in comparison to the UK (7.6), Israel (7.3) and Greece (4.3)
==Death by homicide==
Death by homicide figures are somewhat less charitable to the US: of the 71 countries for which statistics were taken for death by homicide, the US was 27th, with 6.9 deaths per 100,000 of the population, putting it in the vicinity of such exalted company as Thailand, Guyana, Cuba and Costa Rica, although far short of Colombia's 61.6 deaths per 100,000. By contrast, Western European countries featured much lower down the list, such as Poland (2.7 per 100,000), Belgium (1.6), Italy (1.1) and the UK (0.8)
==Death by firearm==
Anyone against gun control in the US should look away now. The US is second in national rates of deaths by firearm, with 11.3 deaths per 100,000 in total. Of these, 6.4 per 100,000 were using their gun to check themselves out, with 4.4 using a gun to kill somebody else. Only Albania was higher, with a homicide rate of 17.6 per 100,000. Most of Western Europe is below 1 per 100,000, including the UK, with a homicide-by-firearm rate of only 0.1. Some would suggest that this is related to the number of guns per capitaWhich doesn't hold when Canada, a nation as richly endowed with guns as the US, is factored in They still have controls that would make every Republican cry hysterically in a corner, so... and is expected, but they are probably looking away right now anyway.
==External links==
*WHO's World report on violence and health
==References==
category:culture
category:sociology
Wrong direction

Wrong direction is a logical fallacy that occurs when a cause is mistakenly considered an effect.
The fallacy is a fallacy of causation.
==Alternate names==
*reversing causation
*confusing cause and effect
*faulty causal direction
==Examples==
*Chanticleer the rooster crows loudly enough to bring the sun up.
*Cancer causes smoking.
*The street lights turning on causes the Sun to set.
*Winds are caused by waving trees.
*Kids that play a lot of video games are the most violent. Clearly, video games make children more violent.
:Not only is this an unrepresentative sample, but it's possible that violent children play video games because they are violent.
*Evolution causes mutation
==See also==
*Confusion of the inverse
*Causalation
*Correlation does not imply causation
==External links==
*
*Wrong Direction, One Good Move
Category:Causation fallacies
Wronger than wrong

Wronger than wrong is a logical fallacy that occurs when it is asserted that different degrees of "right" or "wrong" are the same — a form of equivocation of degrees of truth.
The fallacy is a fallacy of ambiguity and an informal fallacy.
==Explanation==
The phrase "wronger than wrong" was coined by Isaac Asimov in The Relativity of Wrong (expanded and popularised by Michael Shermer, who called it "Asimov's Axiom").Scientific American: Wronger than wrong by Michael Shermer (November 1, 2006) Scientific American Wronger than wrong describes any idea that equates errors that clearly aren't equal. The example originally given is that a belief in a flat earth is wrong, but a belief in a spherical earth is also wrong (as it's actually an oblate spheroid) — however, saying that belief in a spherical or in a flat earth are equally wrong is more wrong than both those errors combined. Blurring concepts into the same category of "wrong" or "improbable", despite their obvious difference in the magnitude of how "wrong" and "improbable" they are, is an example of the continuum fallacy (the "fallacy of gray"). Another example to illustrate the difference is that it would be wrong to categorize bats as rodents but also to categorize bats as insects. However, bats as rodents is far less wrong as both are orders of mammals, and their superficial similarity to mice has led to a common misconception that bats and mice are closely related, an understandable mistake by someone who isn't well-read on the subject. However, categorizing bats as bugs is entirely wrong, arthropods and chordates are entirely different phyla and have very little in common with each other except that they're both part of the clade Nephrozoa.
File:Spherical coordinates on a globe dA.svg|The Earth as a sphere: wrong
File:Orlando-Ferguson-flat-earth-map edit.jpg|Flat Earth: wronger
File:FalseBalance.jpg|Thinking the two are equally valid: not even wrong
==Importance==
This phrase has important implications regarding the nature of scientific theories and aptly describes how the scientific method builds up knowledge and understanding — theories may change and adapt, but calling them outright wrong is not necessarily the right way to go about it. One reviewer of Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong asserted that such thinking was a great tool for "arming oneself against the inevitable anti-science attack that one often hears — [that] theories are always preliminary and science really doesn't 'know' anything".The Relativity of Wrong reviewed by John H. Jenkin (1998; archived from July 6, 2010)
==See also==
*Not even wrong
*Relativist fallacy
*Science was wrong before
*Fractal wrongness
*LessWrong
==External links==
*
==References==
Category:Fallacies of ambiguity