nyuuzyou/wikis huggingface dataset:
Sand

*Coarse sand for LID construction shall be washed clean and free of toxic materials.
*The pH of the sand shall be ≤ 7.0. 
*The coarse sand shall have a fineness modulus index between 2.8 and 3.1 according to ASTM C33/C33M, or otherwise meet the gradation below.
 Particle size distribution
Sieve 	Percent passing
9.5 mm 	100
4.75 mm (No.4) 	95 - 100
2.36 mm (No.8) 	80 - 100
1.18 mm (No.16) 	50 - 85
0.60 mm (No.30) 	25 - 50
0.30 mm (No.50) 	5 - 30
0.15 mm (No.100) 	0 - 10
0.075 mm (No.200)	≤ 3
category: materials
Site assessment of industrial, commercial and multi-res

Understanding site conditions is critical when Screening LID Options. Gaining comprehensive knowledge of the proposed site requires a desktop review of relevant background information followed by field reconnaissance to verify the review and identify relevant site conditions not included in background information. 
==Desktop analysis==
Reviewing background information will help provide preliminary understanding of side conditions, scope technical investigations for the site and determine project targets. It’s best to collect and review this information prior to field reconnaissance so that it is a targeted and efficient use of time. 
Relevant background information includes but is not limited to:
* Construction drawings from site and adjacent properties
* Mechanical drawings identifying rain leader piping
* Structural reports and plans (to assess greenroof suitability)
* Servicing drawings (hydro, phone, gas, cable, and other utilities)
* Grading plans
* Stormwater management and drainage reports
* Sump-pump and/or foundation drain connection information
* Local stormwater management criteria
* Hydrologic models
* Hydraulic models
* Aerial photos
* Surveys
* Local Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
* Surficial soils and geology data
* Geotechnical investigations and reports
* Relevant local policies, by-laws and standards
* Snow plow/salting operations
* Snow storage
* Smoking areas
* Neighbouring landscapes
* Landowner/company vision and priorities
==Field Reconnaissance==
When documenting side conditions for commercial, industrial, and multi-residential sites, investigate the following:
*Drainage and grade
*Roof tops
*Parking Lots
**Parking lot islands
**Landscaping
**Parking availability and access
*Access, traffic, and pedestrian safety
*Building location
*Pollution sources and opportunities for pollution prevention
*Underground utilities
*Accommodation of surface elements (such as light standards, storage areas or other items)
*Transportation requirements
*Site aesthetics
*Shipping and receiving requirements
*Spill containment plans
*Operations and maintenance capabilities
*Municipal engineering standards
*Traffic safety issues
*Pedestrian safety and accessibility
*Snow removal and fire access requirements (minimum access road width and turning radius requirements)
*General impressions
This list is not meant to be exhaustive - keep your eyes open for other relevant factors, and let us know if there's anything we should add.
Once the analysis is complete, proceed to developing a list of recommended BMPs for implementation.
===See also===
LID opportunities in industrial, commercial and multi-residential types
Category:Planning
Slope table

Percent Slope	Horizontal/Vertical (slope gradient)	Degrees Slope
1 	100 	0.6
2 	50 	1.1
3 	33.3 	1.7
4 	25 	2.3
5 	20 	2.9
6 	16.7 	3.4
7 	14.3 	4.0
8 	12.5 	4.6
9 	11.1 	5.1
10 	10 	5.7
11 	9.1 	6.3
12 	8.3 	6.8
13 	7.7 	7.4
14 	7.1 	8.0
15 	6.7 	8.5
16 	6.3 	9.1
17 	5.9 	9.6
18 	5.6 	10.2
19 	5.3 	10.8
20 	5.0 	11.3
21 	4.8 	11.9
22 	4.5 	12.4
23 	4.3 	13.0
24 	4.2 	13.5
25 	4.0 	14.0
26 	3.8 	14.6
27 	3.7 	15.1
28 	3.6 	15.6
29 	3.4 	16.2
30 	3.3 	16.7
31 	3.2 	17.2
32 	3.1 	17.7
33 	3.0 	18.3
34 	2.9 	18.8
35 	2.9 	19.3
36 	2.8 	19.8
37 	2.7 	20.3
38 	2.6 	20.8
39 	2.6 	21.3
40 	2.5 	21.8
41 	2.4 	22.3
42 	2.4 	22.8
43 	2.3 	23.3
44 	2.3 	23.7
45 	2.2 	24.2
46 	2.2 	24.7
47 	2.1 	25.2
48 	2.1 	25.6
49 	2.0 	26.1
50 	2.0 	26.6
51 	2.0 	27.0
52 	1.9 	27.5
53 	1.9 	27.9
54 	1.9 	28.4
55 	1.8 	28.8
56 	1.8 	29.2
57 	1.8 	29.7
58 	1.7 	30.1
59 	1.7 	30.5
60 	1.7 	31.0
61 	1.6 	31.4
62 	1.6 	31.8
63 	1.6 	32.2
64 	1.6 	32.6
65 	1.5 	33.0
66 	1.5 	33.4
67 	1.5 	33.8
68 	1.5 	34.2
69 	1.4 	34.6
70 	1.4 	35.0
71 	1.4 	35.4
72 	1.4 	35.8
73 	1.4 	36.1
74 	1.4 	36.5
75 	1.3 	36.9
76 	1.3 	37.2
77 	1.3 	37.6
78 	1.3 	38.0
79 	1.3 	38.3
80 	1.3 	38.7
81 	1.2 	39.0
82 	1.2 	39.4
83 	1.2 	39.7
84 	1.2 	40.0
85 	1.2 	40.4
86 	1.2 	40.7
87 	1.1 	41.0
88 	1.1 	41.3
89 	1.1 	41.7
90 	1.1 	42.0
91 	1.1 	42.3
92 	1.1 	42.6
93 	1.1 	42.9
94 	1.1 	43.2
95 	1.1 	43.5
96 	1.0 	43.8
97 	1.0 	44.1
98 	1.0 	44.4
99 	1.0 	44.7
100 	1.0 	45.0
Smart Sponge

==What is it?==
Smart Sponge is a polymer technology produced by AbTech Industries. AbTech Industries. 2017. Smart Sponge. https://www.abtechindustries.com/smart-sponge Smart Sponge “uses renewable resource based metal nanocomposites extruded into an adsorptive sponge media. The media will bind with phosphorus and heavy metals resulting in removal rates as high as 98%”.Abtech Industries. Smart Sponge Heavy Metals (HM). https://www.abtechindustries.com/smart-sponge-hm. Accessed November 2, 2017.
==How is it being used?==
No projects have been found in Ontario to date.
==Benefits==
The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Louisiana State University in partnership with the Louisiana Transportation Research Center did an investigation of the contaminant removal efficiency of different materials to reduce the discharge of various pollutants from linear transportation systems. Stormwater treatment experiments were conducted using three laboratory columns filled with different combinations of filter medium layers, and the optimum filter medium combination was found to be a mixture of Smart Sponge and Hydro CX2 (a type of fibre mulch) in the top layer, with other layers of zerolite, sand, sawdust, and gravel. Results of the laboratory experiments indicate that this layer combination is able to remove 90% of total phosphorus (as well as a majority of the total suspended solids, fecal coliform bacteria and heavy metals).Deng, Z. First Flush Reactor for Stormwater Treatment for Elevated Linear Transportation Projects. Louisiana State University and Louisiana Transportation Research Center. 2009. Accessed November 2, 2017: http://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/pdf/2010/08_3tire.pdf 
The Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure tests have shown that Smart Sponge is a non-leaching product. This means that after its lifespan (1-3 years), it can be removed as solid waste and disposed of in waste-to-energy facilities, cement kilns, or landfills. 
Back to additives.
----
----
category: materials
category: phosphorus
category: water quality
Soil cells: Gallery

IMG_1349_550x550.jpg|Soil cells under construction.
Mississauga - Central Parkway - silva cell installation.JPG|Soil cell installation on Central Parkway in Mississauga.
Central Parkway - soil cell, stormwater planter.JPG|Built in 2014, this stormwater planter on Central Parkway in Mississauga uses supported soil cells and is functioning well.
File:Distribution pipes Soil Cells.PNG|Soil Cell installation along the Moynes and Berl Avenues on north side of The Queensway in Toronto. The picture depicts stormwater distribution pipes through the system, used to help provide water to the trees that will be later planted in the BMP feature. Photo credit: City of Toronto 
File:Soil cells - construction.PNG|Silva Cell “top” deck prior to organic layer and screenings for pavers. Photo credit: City of Toronto
File:Waterfrontsoilcell DeepRoot.PNG|400px|Soil Cells being installed along Edgewater Drive for Waterfront Toronto. Photo credit: DeepRoot
File:Stormwater Tree Trenches at East Bayfront Promenade, Toronto.jpg|Stormwater Tree Trenches at East Bayfront Promenade, Toronto. Photo credit: DeepRoot
File:Vancouver Waterfront.PNG|Seawall Soil Cells (Tree Trenches) located in Vancouver. Photo credit:City of Vancouver
File:Concrete pad stormwater tree trench.JPG|Stormwater tree trenches designed with a structural concrete pad over top of the installation. Photo credit:DeepRoot
category:Gallery
Stone

For advice on aggregates used in underdrains, see Reservoir aggregate.
Stone or gravel can serve as a low maintenance decorative feature, but it may also serve many practical functions on the surface of an LID practice.
===Stone for erosion control===
Aggregates used to line swales or otherwise dissipate energy (e.g. in forebays) should have high angularity to increase the permissible shear stress applied by the flow of water. Roger T. Kilgore and George K. Cotton, (2005) Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings Hydraulic Engineering Circular Number 15, Third Edition https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/05114/05114.pdf However, in some surface landscaped applications there may be a desire to use a rounded aggregate such as 'river rock' for aesthetic reasons. Rounded stones should be of sufficient size to resist being moved by the flow of water. Typical stone for this purpose ranges between 50 mm and 250 mm in diameter. The larger the stone, the more energy dissipation.
*Stone beds should be twice as thick as the largest stone's diameter.
*If the stone bed is underlain by a drainage geotextile, annual inspection and possible replacement should be performed as there is a potential for clogging of this layer to occur. 
===Stone mulch===
Finer inorganic mulch materials can be of value applied in areas with extended ponding times i.e. in the the centre of recessed, bowl shaped bioretention, stormwater planters, trenches or swale practices. Inorganic mulches resist movement from flowing water and do not float. Applying a thin layer of inorganic mulch over the top of wood based mulch has been shown to reduce migration of the underlying layer by around 25% Simcock, R and Dando, J. 2013. Mulch specification for stormwater bioretention devices. Prepared by Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd for Auckland Council. Auckland Council technical report, TR2013/056 . 
Inorganic mulches which may be available locally, include:
*Pea gravel
*River rock/beach stone
*Recycled glass
*Crushed mussel shells
----
Category:Materials
Category:Landscaping
Stormwater planters: Gallery

LSRCA planters.jpg|Stormwater planters are ideal for situating alongside buildings to capture rainwater from roof runoff. LSRCA headquarters, 2017. 
Planter PWD.jpg|Stormwater planter, treating downspout runoff, at Waterview Rec Center, Philidelphia Photo credit: PWD
SUNY-ESF-rain-garden-2014-b.jpg|Rain garden, Illick Hall, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NYPhoto credit: DASonnenfeld
Category:Gallery
Swales: Gallery

CVC Office, Grass Swale.JPG|Grass swale in CVC headquarters parking lot, Mississauga ON
Residential swale1.JPG|Water distributed into a wide grass swale with a rock level spreader
Residential swale3.JPG|Flow in this wide swale is being reduced by taller vegetation on some sections (See Manning's n) 
File:DAA Grass swales 1 550x550.jpg
Category:Gallery
Swales: TTT

It is recommended that grass and enhanced grass swales be modelled using the 'Swale' element in the TTT. A 'swale' has to connect two existing elements within the TTT 
Bioswales or dry swales, which have amended filter media, should be modelled as bioretention cells.
The alternative is to use the 'enhanced swale' within the LID toolbox, but this incorporates fewer design parameters (and doesn't account for infiltration). 
A 'swale' as a conveyance element in the TTT (key parameters)
General Info 	General Info
Upstream Node 	Name of node on the inlet end of the swale (higher elevation)
Downstream Node 	Name of node on the outlet end of the swale (lower elevation)
Manning's Roughness 	Lower numbers indicate less surface obstruction and result in faster flow. 
Suggested range for mown grass (dependent on density) 0.03 – 0.06 Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati ONRMRL. Storm Water Management Model Reference Manual Volume I Hydrology (Revised). 2016:233.https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100NYRA.txt Accessed August 23, 2017.
Upstream Invert (m) 	Depth of swale invert above node invert at inlet end of the swale
Downstream Invert (m) 	Depth or elevation of the swale invert above the node invert at the outlet end of the swale
Cross section 	Cross section
Maximum Depth (m) 	Depth of the swale
Bottom Width (m) 	Bottom width of the trapezoidal swale For a triangular channel, enter 0
Left Side Slope (m/m) 	Left side slope (run/rise). Suggested value of 3 or 4 if design permits.
Right Side Slope (m/m)	Right side slope (run/rise). Suggested value of 3 or 4 if design permits.
Seepage (mm/hour) 	Infiltration rate of native (or amended) soil
 
 Parameters for 'enhanced swales' in the LID toolbox of the TTT
Surface 	Surface
Berm height (mm) 	This is the height of the curb which constrains the overland sheet flow of water. Where the bottom of the slope discharges directly into another LID facility without impedance, the value is 0.
Surface roughness (Manning’s n)	Lower numbers indicate less surface obstruction and result in faster flow. 
Suggested range for mown grass (dependent on density) 0.03 – 0.06 Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati ONRMRL. Storm Water Management Model Reference Manual Volume I Hydrology (Revised). 2016:233.https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100NYRA.txt Accessed August 23, 2017.
Surface slope (%) 	If the slope > 3%, use Check dams to create temporary ponding, increase infiltration, and slow flow to reduce erosion.
Swale side slopes (run/rise) 	Suggested value of 3 or 4 if design permits.
Category: modeling
TRIECA2019

__NOTOC__
==Hydrogeological data in Ontario==
*Oakridges Water
*Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network
*Groundwater Information Network
*Ontario Groundwater
*Surficial geology of southern Ontario
==Darcy Drainage== 
==Groundwater Mounding==
==LID lifecycle costing==
*STEPs LID costing project page
==Other==
*MOE 2003 on Infiltration Trenches
*Source water Protection
*Free infiltration rate e-learning
===Relevant wiki pages===
*Infiltration trenches
*Infiltration chambers
Table of contents

__NOTOC__
Structural BMP types	Non-structural practices	Planning	Other topics
*Bioretention
*Bioswales 
*Blue roofs
*Downspout disconnection
*Dry ponds
*Enhanced swales
*Exfiltration trenches
*Filtration Manufactured Treatment Devices
*Gravel diaphragms
*Green roofs
*Infiltration basins
*Infiltration chambers
*Infiltration trenches
*Level spreaders
*Oil and Grit Separator
*Permeable pavements
*Pretreatment
*Rain barrels
*Rain gardens
*Rainwater harvesting
*Soakaways
*Soil cells
*Stormwater planters
*Stormwater tree trenches
*Swales
*Vegetated filter strips
*Wetlands	
*Absorbent landscapes
*Digital technologies
*Pollution prevention
*Turf	
*Source Water Protection
*Integrated design
*Better site design
**Existing hydrology
**Siting and layout of development
**Reducing impervious area
**Natural drainage
**Public lands site conditions
*LID opportunities
**Screening LID options
** Site considerations and constraints
**By road type
**On industrial and commercial properties
**On public lands
**On residential lands
*Treatment trains
* Key design and plan review considerations
* LID Planning and Design Fact Sheets
*LID Case Studies	
* Climate trends in Ontario
*Construction
*Cost analysis resources
*Design infiltration rate
*Definition of Low Impact Development
*Documentation
*Double ring infiltrometers
*Drainage time
*Drawings
* Evolution of SWM in Ontario
*Flood mitigation
*Flow control
*Funding
*Glossary of terms
*Grading
*Grain size analysis
*Groundwater
*History and context
*Infiltration
*Infiltration testing
*Inlets
* Inspection and maintenance
* Key design and plan review considerations
* LID Life Cycle Costing Tool
* LID Treatment Train Tool
*Low permeability soils
* Maintenance, rehabilitation and repair
*Monitoring
*Nutrients
*Other guides
*Percolation test
*Permeameters
*Phosphorus
*Plant lists
*Roadside safety
*Runoff volume control target
*Salt
* Stormwater thermal mitigation
*Testing
*Understanding rainfall statistics
*Water quality
*Wells
*Wildlife
*Winter
Or view Every single page of the guide!
Test pit

===Soil colours and hydrologyInterpreting Soil Colour, Agriculture Victoria http://vro.agriculture.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/soilhealth_interpret_colour Accessed 30 April 2019 ===
* Bright colours and strong reds indicate that the soil, or horizon, is well drained, or at least rarely suffers from prolonged saturation. 
* Dull colours: yellows, and greys, often found together in mottled horizons indicate that the soil is not well drained and does suffer from prolonged saturation. 
* Blue-grey and blue-green colours are a certain indication that the soil is saturated for most of the year. The colours are due to iron (normally red as oxide) being present in a reduced form (the opposite of being oxidised) and may be combined with sulphur, as a sulphide. Hence, such soils can often smell like bad eggs.
* Precipitation of iron compounds, usually orange or dull red, sometimes in association with manganese (black), is an indication of oxidation occurring in a generally waterlogged environment. Iron goes into solution in water that is low in oxygen, it can then be transported through the landscape until it reaches a more aerated zone when it precipitates. This iron movement process: solution, transport, precipitation/enrichment, is extremely common in soils and takes many different forms. It can occur as a groundwater discharge process, as a vertical leaching process of the upper part of the soil profile, or as a lateral (throughflow) process within the upper part of the soil profile. Concentrations of iron may occur as pans, as buckshot or ironstone and as laterite. The mottling of soils mentioned above occurs because of a more diffuse, small scale (a few centimetres) redistribution of iron within the material of the soil profile and the formation of iron hydroxides (yellow).
* White or grey horizons between the topsoil and a clay subsoil can result from a long process of leaching. These horizons are washed out and usually have less clay than the darker topsoil and are often sandy loams with a very high proportion of fine sand. Sand in these horizons is often over 70 % of the total mineral matter. The leaching occurs laterally, i.e. instead of water moving downwards through the soil it follows a path parallel to the ground surface and the upper surface of the subsoil. They invariably become saturated rapidly in winter and contribute to waterlogging. They are very rarely saline being so highly leached.
* White colours in the subsoil are often due to the presence of calcium carbonate. This can be tested for using a little hydrochloric acid. If carbonate is present a few drops of acid will cause the soil to fizz and bubble as carbon dioxide is formed by the reaction of acid and carbonate. The depth from the ground surface to such a layer is often a good indication of the amount of leaching that has occurred throughout the formation of the soil.
----
Topsoil

Topsoil may be material that was stripped from the project site and stored in stockpiles for re-use, or material imported to the site from a supplier provided the physical and chemical characteristics are within acceptable ranges.
Topsoil shall be in compliance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 Record of Site Condition standards for soil quality or as amended through Ontario Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices.
Soil laboratory reports shall certify the material to be suitable for re-use on residential, parkland, institutional, industrial, commercial, or community landscapes for the germination of seeds and the support of vegetative growth.
The factors to consider in determining if a topsoil is suitable for use as planting soil for a vegetated stormwater practice, or use in producing a bioretention filter media mixture include the following:
* Must be friable and capable of sustaining vigorous plant growth;
* Must be free from toxic material and roots, stones or debris over 50 mm (2") in diameter; 
* Should not have been passed through sieves or screens smaller than 50 mm (2”) to avoid eliminating peds; 
* Should have a Loamy Sand, Sandy Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Loam or Silty Loam soil texture;
* For use as planting soil for a vegetated stormwater practice , the topsoil must contain a minimum of 5% organic matter by dry weight or be amended so, through addition of an organic soil conditioner;
* For use in producing bioretention filter media Blend B (water quality treatment priority), the topsoil must contain at least 9%, and not greater than 36% clay-sized particles and at least 2% organic matter by dry weight. 
* Must have a pH of between 6.0 and 8.0; 
* Must have a sodium absorption ratio less than 15; 
* Must have a cationic exchange capacity greater than 10 milliequivalents per 100 grams (meq/100 g).
Specify that 4 litre samples of topsoil, from each source to be drawn upon, be provided to the consultant for visual inspection, along with topsoil quality test results from an accredited soil testing laboratory, or a quality assurance certificate from the supplier. 
We recommend a planting soil or filter media depth of 300 mm to support grasses, 600 mm for shrubs and perennials, and 1000 mm for trees.
category: materials
Trees: List

*STEP stars
These are species which have demonstrated good performance in projects designed, installed and monitored by the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program.
 Sortable table, click on header you wish to select tree by
Scientific Name 	Common Name 	Soil Moisture1=Dry2=Med3=Wet	Partial shade tolerance	Drought Tolerance1=Low2=Med3=High	Salt Tolerance1=Low2=Med3=High	Pollution tolerance	Compaction tolerance	STEP Star*	Illustration
Acer rubrum 	Red Maple 	2-3 	Y 	2 	1 	Y 	Y 	☆ 	
Acer saccharinum 	Silver Maple 	2-3 	 	2 	1-2 	 	Y 	 	
Acer saccharum ssp. saccharum 	Sugar Maple 	2-3 	Y 	2 	1 	 	 	 	
Acer x freemanii 	Hybrid Maple / Freeman Maple 	2-3 	Y 	2 	1-2 	 	Y 	☆ 	
Alnus incana 	Speckled Alder / White Alder 	2-3 	N 	2 	1-2 	Y 	Y 	☆ 	
Betula papyrifera 	Paper Birch 	1-2 	 	2 	2-3 	 	 	☆ 	
caroliniana 	American hornbeam / Blue Beech	2-3 	Y 	2 	1 	 	 	 	upright=0.35
Carya cordiformis 	Bitter-nut Hickory 	1-2 	Y 	2 	1 	 	 	 	
Carya ovata 	Shag-bark Hickory 	1-2 	Y 	3 	1 	 	 	 	
Celtis occidentalis 	Common Hackberry 	2 	 	2 	2 	 	Y 	☆ 	
Fraxinus americana 	White Ash 	2 	Y 	1-2 	2-3 	 	 	 	
Fraxinus nigra 	Black Ash 	2-3 	Y 	1-2 	2-3 	 	Y 	 	
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 	Green Ash 	2-3 	 	2 	1-2 	 	Y 	 	
Ginkgo biloba 	Ginkgo 	2 	Y 	2 	2-3 	Y 	Y 	 	
Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis	Thornless Honey Locust 	1-2 	Y 	3 	3 	Y 	Y 	☆ 	
Gymnocladus dioicus 	Kentucky Coffeetree 	1-2 	Y 	3 	3 	Y 	Y 	☆ 	
Juglans nigra 	Black Walnut 	1-2 	Y 	3 	1-2 	 	 	 	
Juniperus virginiana 	Eastern Red Cedar 	1-2 	Y 	3 	2 	Y 	 	☆ 	
laricina 	Tamarack / American Larch 	1-3 	Y 	3 	3 	 	 	 	
tulipifera 	Tulip Tree 	2 	Y 	1 	1 	 	 	 	
glauca 	White Spruce 	2 	 	2 	1 	Y 	 	 	
pungens 	Colorado Spruce 	2 	 	2 	3 	 	 	 	
Pinus mugo 	Mugo Pine 	1-2 	Y 	2 	3 	 	 	 	
strobus 	Eastern White Pine 	1-2 	 	2 	1 	 	 	 	
occidentalis 	Sycamore 	2-3 	 	2 	1 	 	Y 	 	
balsamifera ssp. balsamifera 	Balsam Poplar 	2 	 	2 	3 	 	 	 	
deltoides 	Eastern Cottonwood 	2 	 	3 	2-3 	Y 	Y 	 	
grandidentata 	Large-tooth Aspen 	2 	 	3 	2-3 	 	 	 	upright=0.35
tremuloides 	Trembling Aspen 	2 	 	2 	2-3 	 	 	 	
serotina 	Wild Black Cherry 	2 	 	2 	2-3 	 	 	 	
alba 	White Oak 	1-2 	Y 	3 	3 	 	 	 	
bicolor 	Swamp White Oak 	2-3 	 	3 	2-3 	 	Y 	☆ 	
macrocarpa 	Bur Oak 	1-3 	 	3 	2-3 	 	Y 	☆ 	
muehlenbergii 	Chinquapin oak / Yellow oak 	3 	 	3 	2 	 	 	 	
palustris 	Pin Oak 	2-3 	 	3 	1 	 	 	 	upright=0.35
rubra 	Red Oak 	1-2 	 	2 	3 	Y 	 	☆ 	
amygdaloides 	Peachleaf Willow 	3 	 	1-2 	3 	 	Y 	 	
lucida 	Shining Willow 	3 	 	1-2 	3 	 	Y 	 	
nigra 	Black Willow 	3 	 	1 	2-3 	 	Y 	 	upright=0.35
occidentalis 	Eastern White Cedar 	2-3 	 	3 	1-2 	 	 	 	
americana 	American Basswood 	2 	Y 	2 	1-2 	 	 	 	
americana 	American Elm 	2-3 	Y 	2 	2 	Y 	Y 	☆ 	
Category: Green infrastructure