Wheat Waffle's Attraction Scale

==Wheat Waffles' Three Tier Theory==
Wheat Waffles' Three Tier Theory divides men into three coarse tiers: Chads, Normies, and Subfives. This tier system is proposed in his videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azBEWpbtlxM as an alternative to the Decile scale, due to the fact that females are more likely to inflate the score by 2-3 points for "virtue signaling" (Platitude) and threat avoidance purposes (AKA offensiveness avoidance)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRCNxJvgu6Y. The concept of male-female rating deviations has ben reaffirmed though aggregation of multiple rating data.https://goldvalueideas.com/2021/03/17/sex-differences-in-romantic-selectiveness/ some data can be considered based on Indicator of interest and Fuck-off signals.
The table below shows typical female reactions to a male in each tier:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQOhRx3fDJ8
 	Chads 	Normies 	"SUBFIVE"
Emotion (Russell)https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Emotion_classification#/Circumplex_model	High Arousal and Positive Valence 	Low Arousal and Positive Valence, or Neutral Valence 	High Arousal, Negative or Neutral Valence
Emotion(Bradley)https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2001-10055-007 	Appetitive Motivation 	Low Arousal, Neutral Valence/Pleasure 	Defensive Motivation
Example 	Happy, Surprised 	Neutral, Relaxed 	Disgust, Anger
Physical 	Accentuation of Beauty 	(None) 	Misaligned Foot, Head or Naval
Psychological 	Female Desiring Skin Contact 	Soft Rejections (Friendzone) 	Arms Close to Body, Deterrence
Proxemics 	Close or Reducing Distance 	Stable Distance 	Far or Increased Distance
Traits 	Negatives as Positives (Halo effect) 	Meritocratic 	Positives as Negatives (Failo effect)
Complement 	"Attractive", "Hot" (present-oriented) 	"Fine", "Nothing Wrong" (past-oriented) 	"Some Day", "Find" (future-oriented)
Typology 	Type-Independent, "Gold Standard" 	Type-dependency and Niche Markets 	Universally identified as a unique category
Gymmaxxing 	Unnecessary 	Necessary 	Compensatory & Detremental
Height 	6 foot 4 (1.95m) increases attractiveness 	5 foot 11 (1.8m) as average 	5 foot 6 (1.65m) decreases attractiveness
Matches per day 	10+ 	1-3 	~0
Attention 	Flows From Female to Male 	Flows From Male to Female 	Disassociation
Jawline 	Sharp increases attractiveness 	Round 	Weak decreases attractiveness
Eyes 	"Hunter Eyes" increases attractiveness 	Regular Eyes 	Protruding Eyes decreases attractiveness
Relationships 	Polygyny permitted, female-funded, memorable	Needs commitment, "equal couples", forgetful 	Requires simping
Dating 	Easy With No Need For Game 	Flaking is Common, Game is Needed 	Direct Rejection, Game is Useless
Selection 	Elective (exposure) 	Competitive (amongst normies) 	Self-sabotage
Texting 	Leaves women frustrated if on read 	Gets left on read for hours 	Blocked & Filtered
Photos 	Mirror Selfies is Sufficient 	Photogenic Techniques Needed 	Completely Useless
High School 	Gets Dating Gossip, "Heart-Breaker" banter 	Self-Help & Platitudes, "The One" banter, Just Be First	Exclusion from the conversation
Aged Chances 	Dominate since the 20s 	Can Statusmaxx in the 30s 	(Lucky if in the 40s)
Lookism 	"Nothing to worry" 	"You'll find someone" 	Insistence on Personality
Tactic Preference 	Online and Cold Approach Works 	Warm Approach > Cold Approach > Online 	Approaches Will Fail
==Wheat Waffles' Exponential Attraction Theory==
His other idea is that when the decile scale is correctly calibrated, the match rate becomes exponential. An equation can be derived from his scaling factor to give resolution to values. His Theory coincides with Tinder researcheshttps://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9ahttps://senseoffairness.blog/2020/02/14/the-unfairness-of-online-dating/https://freedomandprosperity.org/2019/blog/attractiveness-income-sex-and-inequality/ However this rating system puts 4s, which should be by name "Subfive", to be a Normie.
Note:
* The matching chances between the Tinder study and his opinions are 2 points short.
* Female attention scales exponentially (2x as much) on decile-equivalent scalehttps://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/okcupid/yourlooksandyourinbox.html, but the population distribution is psuedo-linear (a shape between a uniform distributionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_uniform_distribution and a semi-circlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_semicircle_distribution).
Decile 	9 	8 	7 	6 	5 	4 	3 	2 	1 	EQUATION
1 in X chance of matching (WW Estimate)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRCNxJvgu6Y 	3 	5.5 	10 	19 	34 	61 	110 	200 	370 	3*(SQRT(10/3))^(9-RATING)
WW Naming Scheme 	Chad 	Chad 	Chadlite	Normie (Brad)	Normie (Tanner)	Normie (Melvin)	Subfive	Subfive	Subfive	
Top Percentile of Attractivenesshttps://goldvalueideas.com/2021/03/17/sex-differences-in-romantic-selectiveness/	1.25th	2.5th	5th 	10th 	20th 	30th 	55th 	65th 	80th 	10*SQRT(5/3)^(10-RATING)-14.5
Estimation, See 80/20 Rule
1 in X chance of matching (Tinder Experiment) 	11 	19 	35 	63 	110 	210 	380 	680 	1240 	100/EXP((B1-52.3)/16.8)
==Clarification on Proxemics and Skin Contact==
The problem with his idea is that it is not quantifiable. In order to reduce this problem, Proxemics of skin contacthttps://www.zmonline.com/the-latest/oxford-university-creates-map-of-appropriate-touching/ and social distancehttps://mangementchallenge.weebly.com/proxemicsspace-design.html can be used as an effective tool, and that their naming scheme can be matched well.
Proxemics 	Intimate Space 	Personal Space 	Social Space 	Public Space
Distance 	under 1.5ft or 0.45m 	1.5~4ft or 0.45~1.2m	4~12ft or 1.2~3.7m 	over 12ft or 3.7m
Roles (Hall) 	Partner 	Friends & Family 	Acquaintance & Extended Family 	Strangers
Dunbar's Definition 	Ego
Support Clique (Kin) 	Sympathy Group (Superfamily)
Affinity Group (Band)	Active Network (Clan)
Acquaintance (Megaband)	Memorable Faces (Tribe)
Casual Naminghttps://sethnichols.org/2020/11/09/17-relationship-gardens/http://www.pursuitofhisbest.com/2014/06/the-friendship-hierarchy.html	Boyfriend
Intimate Friends or "OG"s 	Anytime Friends or Close Friends
Party Friends or Good Friends	"Casual" Friends (Wedding/Funeral)
Frenemies or Acquaintances	"Faces" or Strangers
Allowed (Hall) 	Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin	Palms, Arms, or Face	Palms 	N/A
Occasion (Hall) 	N/A 	Torso/Legs 	Arms 	N/A
Never (Hall) 	N/A 	Chest/Groin 	Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin	Palms, Arms, Face, Torso/Legs, or Chest/Groin
Rating Estimation 	"Chad" 	"Normie" 	Upper "Subfive" 	Lower "Subfive"
==Possible Critiques==
The claim that "there is a leap in numbers" implies that either the theory of exponential attractiveness is not "smooth", or the accuracy of match rate measures decreases as it reaches the extremes, following a more sigmoidal pattern. The only other explanation that can explain this phenomenon is that either there is a "cap" (truncation) on maximum fitness.
== See Also ==
Category:Blackpill
Category:Lookism
Category:Theories