Баранки гну.Если такие неграмотные вы с вашими косметологами-изучайте сайт FDА...про разницу и рекомендации.Диспорт в лоб, Ботох в носогубные и у глаз.Аллерган и в Америке дорогой, да плюс работа не менее $900-1200. ДА, такие здесь укольчики, не только Ботокса, все стероиды от 1К.От себя скажу, я делаю раз 30 уже и вижу разницу между американским Аллерганом, гавном израильским и европейским..Ам.ботох лучше во 150т раз, нет отеков, разглаживается быстро, не надо щуриться 2 недели, но он дорогой, Диспорт с меньшей формулой, потому и дешевле и его ВСЯ american association of cosmetologists колeт в ЛОБ !Забыла добавить косметолог с МДИ читайте, если языком владеете, повторять через 3-6 месяцев, но это про Аллерган, а ваши 3 и выдохлось.I think by now we’re all familiar with Botox, an injectable that relaxes the muscles that cause wrinkles such as frown line, forehead lines, and crows feet. It’s made by a company called Allergan, has been around for over 20 years, and has an extremely high safety and efficacy profile.Overall Botox and Dysport are very similar. Both are a type of botulinum type A used to relax the muscles that cause frown lines and other over active muscles of the face, like forehead lines and crows feet. I tell my patients that it’s like comparing apples to apples. There’s a difference between a Fuji apple and a Gala apple, but they are still both apples. Dysport is a smaller-sized molecule so its unit measurement is different than Botox.Both have been in use for years (Dysport in Europe only until recently) and have a high safety profile, both can be used on other parts of the face and body, and both Dysport and Botox must be injected every 3-6 months. Dysport may be slightly less expensive in some offices, but it depends on the office and, of course, the total amount needed to accomplish your goals. Both show similar efficacy and side effects, and in most double-blind clinical studies both the patient and the doctor were unable to tell the results apart.Differences between Botox and DysportThere has been much discussion amongst physicians about the differences between Botox and Dysport Here are the main differences:– Dysport may not last quite as long (duration of efficacy).  – Dysport has a slightly quicker onset (2-5 days vs 4-7 days for Botox)– Dysport diffuses more (i.e., spreads to a wider area).  This is an advantage in some areas of the face and a disadvantage in others;– You need more Dysport to get the same result as Botox. Some physicians are happy that there is finally a Botox competitor, as Botox did monopolize the market for a long time. But the appearance of Dysport hasn’t brought pricing down as some thought it might. There are 3-5 other similar anti-wrinkle products in the FDA pipeline, so within the next few years we’ll have even more alternatives to Botox available. I view competition as a generally good thing as long as the quality of the products are similar. Safety is the key issue, and it remains to be seen if the new products can match the safety of Botox and Dysport.We do live in a society of brand recognition, and as Botox has been available for much longer in the US, many people are more comfortable using what they know. Both Botox and Dysport currently have rebates available from their manufacturer. The program from Allergan is called Brilliant Distinctions and the Medicis program Dysport Challenge.