Конечно, лучше. То есть, это, конечно, тоже горе луковое, но Наместник Христа, не Петра - огромная разница. А отвечать на вопрос трудно, не зная, о каком мы периоде речь ведем. Если по "полной программе", то вот вам Флоренийская Уния 1439, роль Папы разжевана для православных:We also define that the holy apostolic see and the Roman pontiff holds the primacy over the whole world and the Roman pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter prince of the apostles, and that he is the true vicar of Christ, the head of the whole church and the father and teacher of all Christians, and to him was committed in blessed Peter the full power of tending, ruling and governing the whole church, as is contained also in the acts of ecumenical councils and in the sacred canons.отсюда http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/325/texts/florence.htmНу про каноны-то помолчим...А вот вам Первый Ватиканский (1870):So, then, if anyone says that the Roman Pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church, and this not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the Church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the Churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema.(3: 9 Pastor aeternus)Если нужны комментарии, я всегда горазда - лишь бы не забанили.))