Conclusions - Science, Values, and Objectivity

Conclusions
David Hull probably speaks for most philosophers and scientists when he says he wants to “avoid the use of such problematic notions as ‘benefit’” in his treatment of natural selection because “their elimination from explanations of biological adaptations was one of Darwin’s major achievements” (Hull 2001, p. 57). I want to counter this attitude with a gestalt switch. In my view, Darwin does not remove value notions like benefit from our understanding of biological adaptation; he simply spells out the objective signs that reflect when those benefits play a certain kind of explanatory role. The gestalt switch I recommend is to treat Darwin’s achievement not as the elimination of value in biology but as its objectification or operationalization.
I have tried to spell out some of the fruits of one case of this sort of objectification of value in biology. That we can objectify values in science is no surprise. We do it all the time. One objectifies the aggregate economic value of a country’s commerce by measuring its gross national product, and one objectifies the social values of an individual or social group through appropriate public opinion surveys. Whether such objectifications of values in science are interesting depends mainly on the soundness of the objectification methodology and on the specific insights revealed (if any). The proof of this pudding is in the eating. If my case of objectification has any significant interest, it lies in the evolutionary activity statistics and their application in the new defense of adaptationism and the new ability to compare biological and cultural evolution. The main moral I draw from this one case study is that my value-centered view of teleology would never have born these fruits but for its objectification.18
References
Adami, C., and Brown, C. T. (1994), Evolutionary Learning in the 2D Artificial Life System "Avida". In Brooks, R. and Maes, P., eds., Artificial Life IV (Cambridge: MIT Press), 377-381.
Albert, M. B. 1998. The new innovators: Global patenting trends in five sectors. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., and McAllister, P. 1991. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy 20: 251-259.
Aunger, R., ed. 2000. Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. 1992. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beatty, John. 1987. Natural selection and the null hypothesis. In Dupré, J., ed., The Latest on the Best, Essays on Evolution and Optimization (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 53-75.
Bedau, M. A. 1990. Against Mentalism in Teleology. American Philosophical Quarterly 27: 61-70.
Bedau, M. A. 1991. Can Biological Teleology be Naturalized? The Journal of Philosophy 88: 647-655.
Bedau, M. A. 1992a. Where's the Good in Teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781-806.
Bedau, M. A. 1992b. Goal-Directed Systems and the Good. The Monist 75: 34-49.
Bedau, M. A. 1993. Naturalism and Teleology. In S. Wagner and R. Warner, eds., Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 23-51.
Bedau, M. A. 1995. Three Illustrations of Artificial Life's Working Hypothesis. In Banzhaf, W., and Eeckman, F. (eds.) 1995. Evolution and Biocomputation—Computational Models of Evolution (Berlin: Springer), 53-68. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/biocomputation.pdf
Bedau, M. A. 1996. The Nature of Life. In Boden, M., ed., The Philosophy of Artificial Life (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 332-357. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/life.OXFORD.html
Bedau, M. A. 1998. Philosophical Content and Method of Artificial Life. In T. W. Bynam and J. H. Moor, eds., The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy, pp. 135-152. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bedau, M.A. 2002. A new defense of adaptationism. Paper to be presented at the Northwest Philosophy Conference, Lewis and Clark College, October 2002.
Bedau, M. A., and Brown, C. T. 1997. Visualizing Evolutionary Activity of Genotypes. Artificial Life 5: 17-35. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/vis_gtypes_alifejournal.pdf
Bedau, M. A., S. Joshi, and B. Lillie. 1999. Visualizing Waves of Evolutionary Activity of Alleles. In A. Wu, ed., Proceedings of 1999 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Workshop Program (Orlando: GECCO Proceedings), pp. 96-98. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/vis_gecco99.pdf
Bedau, M. A., and Packard, N. 1992. Measurement of Evolutionary Activity, Teleology, and Life. In Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, J. D., and Rasmussen, S., eds., Artificial Life II (Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley), pp. 431-461. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/alife2.pdf
Bedau, M. A., Snyder, E., Brown, C. T., and Packard, N. H. 1997. A Comparison of Evolutionary Activity in Artificial Systems and in the Biosphere. In Husbands, P. and Harvey, I., eds., Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, ECAL97 (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 125-134. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/ecal97.pdf
Bedau, M. A., E. Snyder, N. H. Packard. 1998. A Classification of Long-Term Evolutionary Dynamics. In Adami, C., Belew, R., Kitano, H., and Taylor, C., eds., Artificial Life VI (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 228-237. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/alife6.pdf
Blackmore, S. 1999. The meme machine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brandon, R. N. 1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Boyd, R, and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burien, Richard M. 1992. Adaptation: Historical Perspectives. In E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd, eds., Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) , pp. 7-12.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dawkins, R. D. 1982. The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. D. 1983. Adaptationism was always predictive and needed no defense. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6: 360-361. Commentary on Dennett (1983).
Dennett, D. C. 1983. Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defended. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6: 343-355.
Dennett, Daniel. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Simon and Schuster: New York.
Dupré, J., ed. 1987. The Latest on the Best, Essays on Evolution and Optimization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Farmer, D, and Belin, A. 1992. Artificial Life: The Coming Evolution. In Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, J. D., and Rasmussen, S., eds., Artificial Life II (Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley), pp. 815-840.
Garfield, E., and Welljams-Dorof, A. 1992. Citation data: Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy making. Science and Public Policy 19: 321-327.
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2001. Three kinds of adaptationism. In Orzack, S. H., and Sober, E., eds., Adaptationism and Optimality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 335-357.
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 205, 581-598. Reprinted in Sober, ed., Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 73-90. References to this edition.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., and Vopel, K. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented innovation. Research Policy 81: 511--515.
Hull, D. L. 1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hull, D. L. 2001. Science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kimmura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewontin, Richard. 1977/1985. Adaptation. In R. Levins and R. Lewontin (1985), The dialectical biologist (Cambridge: Harvard University Press). Originally published as “Adattamento” in Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. 1, edited by G. Einaudi (Turin, Italy, 1977).
Lumsden, C. J., and Wilson, E. O. 1981. Genes, mind, and culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lynch, A. 1996. Thought contagion: How belief spreads through society. New York: Basic Books.
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. Optimization theory in evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 31-56.
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mayr, E. 1983. How to carry out the adaptationist program? American Naturalist 121 (March 1983): 324-333. Reprinted in Mayr, E., (1988), Towards a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), 148-159. References to this edition.
Monod, J. 1971. Chance and Necessity. New York: Vintage.
Narin, F. 1994. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30: 147-155.
Orzack, S. H., and Sober, E., eds. 2001. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Orzack, S. H., and Sober, E., 1994. Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. The American Naturalist 143: 361-380.
Pavitt, K. 1985. Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems. Scientometrics 7: 77--99.
Perko, J. S., and Narin, F. 1997. The transfer of public science to patented technology: A case study in agricultural science. Journal of Technology Transfer 22: 65--72.
Raup, D. M. 1987. Neutral models in paleobiology. In Nitecki, M. H., and Hoffman, A., eds., Neutral models in biology (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 121-132.
Ray, T. S. 1992. An Approach to the Synthesis of Life. In Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, J. D., and Rasmussen, S., eds., Artificial Life II (Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley), pp. 371-408.
Rechtsteiner, A.and M. A. Bedau, 1999a, A Generic Model for Quantitative Comparison of Genotypic Evolutionary Activity. In D. Floreano, J.-D. Nicoud, F. Mondada, eds., Advances in Artificial Life (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), pp. 109-118. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/ecal99.pdf
Rechtsteiner, A. and M. A. Bedau, 1999b. A Generic Model for Measuring Excess Evolutionary Activity. In Banzhaf, W., Daida, J., Eiben, A. E., Garzon, M. H., Honavar, V., Jakiela, M., & Smith, R. E. (eds.), GECCO-99: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Vol. 2 (San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann), pp. 1366-1373. Available for download at http://www.reed.edu/~mab/gecco99.pdf
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. Fourth edition. New York: Free Press.
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1985. The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Skusa, A. and M. A. Bedau. 2002. Towards a comparison of evolutionary creativity in biological and cultural evolution. In Artificial Life VIII, R. Standish, M. A. Bedau, and H. Abbass, eds., pp. XX-XX. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sober, E. 1987. What is Adaptationism? In J. Dupré, ed., The Latest on the Best, Essays on Evolution and Optimization (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 105-118.
Sober, E. 1993. Philosophy of biology. Boulder: Westview.
West-Eberhard, Mary Jane. 1992. Adaptation: Current Usages. In E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd, eds., Keywords in evolutionary biology, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), pp. 13-18.
Wilson, E. O. 1978. On human nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. 1987. False models as means to truer theories. In Nitecki, M. H., and Hoffman, A., eds., Neutral models in biology (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 23-55.
Figure 1
Evolutionary activity waves in Evita (top) and its neutral shadow (bottom). Note that the activity scale on the neutral shadow is inflated by a factor of three, in order to highlight the neutral shadow waves (barely visible along the bottom).
|