Teppanyaki or Nintendo Switch?

The question omae wa teppanyaki ya nintendo suichi ga daisumasuka? (English: Do you prefer a teppanyaki or a Nintendo Switch? French: Voulez-vous un filet teppanyaki ou un Nintendo Switch ? Latin: Teppaniaco aut Nintendo-Switch velis? VML: Velis un teppanyaki aut un Nintendo Switch? LFVML: Veliste uno teppanyaki o uno Nintendo Switch? amongst other languages) is a rhetorical question presented during immigration in all states of Moricounie, including Little Fidesham.
== Details ==
The relation between the two objects are not only because they are Japanese, but because they are of the same price in most cases. This is specifically chosen because the choice of that vs. a phone would immediately default to the phone because people can simply order food through it, so the Social Météo deliberately chose a device that nowadays has ironically shitty access to the Internet through a browser, compared to even its predecessor, the Wii U.
The primary problem lies in the wants v. needs question. The teppanyaki will satisfy the need of food, but the wants part of the equation will terminate immediately after the consumption experience, making the person ironically want more, either because it was delicious, or because the serving sizes were hilariously small due to certain food sciences and literally the economy saying so. For the Nintendo Switch, the wants part is assumed to be infinitesimal, assuming the Switch has almost all of the games in the latest Nintendo Switch games catalogue, but it obviously cannot feed the person.
This would-you-rather question has been a staple for Moricounien culture.
It is used in Moricounien captcha systems, wherein if the person fails to pick a choice in time they will be assumed to be a robot. Otherwise, if the person solves way too quickly, they are assumed to be a robot likewise.
It has appeared in every Moricounien interview and psychological-sociological studies ever since Andrew just thought up of the question because he was bored. 
Sometimes, to make the choice harder, Andrew will intentionally add "but after the teppanyaki, you will starve," either due to his Christian background or because he meant it literally. It also demonstrates somehow, according to him, the illusion of free choice, wherein any choice will lead to the same negative outcome anyway. This version of the question is used in immigration. It is illegal to use this in psychiatry or psychological analyses due to its seemingly pessimistic outcome on both ends of the question, which hugely affects resulting data. Social Météo-approved surveys need to have the base-level version which simply state the comparison between wants and needs, without exposing that all will lead to the same outcome.