Full Spectrum Dominance

Russell Weigley talks about some of this in his book, "The American Way of War". After World War II (WWII), America controlled the seas (we were taught by the Germans and the Japanese how important that is). Since WWII, America has controlled the skies (Pearl Harbor taught that painful lesson). In the near future, America will not only control the skies and the seas, we will OWN them. Present UAV and UUV roadmaps validate this statement. Controlling the ground with robotic warriors is problematic, especially when you consider the rules of the Geneva Convention and the Hague World Courts. There's a plethora of international rules and laws concerning ground combat between armies. Comparatively, there's a paucity of international rules and laws about aerial and naval combat.Blog.DefThe United States Government, in partnership with State, local, and tribal governments
as well as private sector partners, will seek to continuously identify and characterize
economic, national security, and other risks posed by cyber threats to and
vulnerabilities in 5G infrastructure.R. 21. Maí, 2020. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/National-Strategy-5G-Final.pdf P. Mar, 2020.
Full-spectrum dominance also known as full-spectrum superiority or supremacy, is an organization's idea of control over all dimensions of a given marketspace, battlespace, or infospace, effectively possessing an overwhelming diversity of resources in such areas as terrestrial, aerial, maritime, subterranean, extraterrestrial, psychological, and bio- or cyber-technological resources.R. 21. Maí, 2020. Wikipedia.org/Full-Spectrum Dominance.G. Eiríksson, 21. Maí, 2020. The United States Department of Defense defines "full-spectrum superiority" as "The cumulative effect of dominance in the air, land, maritime, and space domains and information environment, which includes cyberspace, that permits the conduct of joint operations without effective opposition or prohibitive interference."Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (JP 3-0) page 96. Hosted at http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf.
Critics of US Imperialism have often referred to the term as proof of the ambitions of policymakers in the US and their alleged desire for total control.
== Rhizomata ==
* Dominance; Spectrum; Supremacy; Rule; Overrule; Control; Reach; Power; Access; Security; Statecraft; 
* Command; Cybernetics; Capacity; State capacity; State security; Security forces; National security; 
* Mastery; National intelligence; Globalism; Global rule; Megacorp 
* Organizational intelligence; Force; Dominant force; Overriding force; Statism; Monopoly
* Monopoly on force; 
* Cyber-security; Cyber dominance 
== References ==