Why Not Be About God Rather Than Creator In General?

== Because God Is Distant & Ephemeral (Hard Reality): ==
-This is basically the principle of Hard Reality for the purposes of Infinity Theology. 
-Theist shows why monotheism doesn't seem to last long outside of organized religions. 
== Basic Argument: ==
-It seems absurd but why not just be about 'God' rather than 'Creator' in general? Shouldn't the answer be obvious?
-Well, no, not really.
>God is distant and does not communicate often or outright.
>God does not always feel real. This often leads to a weak Connecting Factor. 
>For Man to be free, God must be distant.
-While Physically present since He is Existence, God is mentally distant from all of us. Therefore, this will always result in a weakened Connecting Factor.
>Existence and other Names always come with baggage, there will always be exceptions to them! 
>You cannot see all of Existence, and God can do anything, so there will always be doubt with this Name and an open question as to what exactly is Actualized out there. 
>I'm convinced this is why monotheism tends to dwindle outside of organized religion! 
== The Problem Of Using Multiple Names: ==
-The weakness of Theist is the practice of using multiple Names. 
-You must have the True Name to know for sure God exists, so once you have it, why waste time on other Names which are incomplete versions of the True Name? 
-More to the point, time spent 'studying' these incomplete Names, some of which will turn out to be false Names, will totally be a waste of time! 
- 
== If God Wanted Theist, Why Is Creator The Naturally Stronger Connecting Factor?: ==
-Category:Metaphysics