Lautsi v. Italy

Lautsi v. Italy is a case of the European Court of Human Rights, which ruled unanimously in 2009 that crucifixes in Italian public school classes are contrary to parents' right to educate their children in line with their convictions and to children's right to freedom of religion (art. 2 of the 1st Protocol, and art. 9 of the Convention). 
The Court did not impose the removal of crucifixes from school classes, which would have been beyond the power of the court, but condemned Italy to pay 5.000 euros for "moral prejudice". 
The case stems from a request of Mrs. Soile Tuulikki Lautsi, citizen of Finland and of Italy, against the School Council of a school in Abano Terme (province of Padua). After the dismissal of her request, Mrs. Lautsi filed appeal to the Regional Administrative Tribunal, which also dismissed the case. Mrs. Lautsi then appealed to the European Court of Human Rights.
It caused an uproar in the Italian politics, and prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's conservative government vowed to oppose the decision.Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgmentFinnish-born woman wins ECHR verdict over State of Italy in crucifix disputeItaly vows to fight for classroom crucifixes
==See also==
*CNCD Decision 323/2006 (similar case in Romania)
==References==
==External links==
*ECHR judgment
*Lautsi v. Italy: Religious Symbols and Parents’ Rights at the ECHR
*ECHR BLOG
*Irish Reactions to Lautsi v Italy
Category:Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Category:Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Category:European Court of Human Rights cases involving Italy
Category:Separation of church and state
Category:European politics
Category:Religion and education
Category:Religion and children
Category:Secularism
it:Lautsi v. Italia