Queen v. Handle

Queen v. Handle was a landmark case on the powers of the Vice President that was ruled on in 2035 by Chief Justice T.J. Nonsink in the District Court. Justice Nonsink ruled in favor of the plaintiff. 
Subject
Then Vice President Jim Handle overruled the dismissal of Senate Bill S.R 016, which had been approved with Unanimous Consent. He was then sued by Casper Queen, who stated that the Vice President cannot overrule an objection to Unanimous Consent.
Trial 
Copy of Queen's opening statement. 
Goodmorning members of the supreme court,
Last night a session in the senate has commenced where a bill, S0.16, has been unanimously dismissed by the US Senate. But was it? The Vice President, here present, has overruled an objection to an unanimous consent dismissal motion. When attended on it, he claimed that because he overruled the objection, he could still dismis the bill with UC (Unanimous Consent).
I ask for the court to overturn the dismissal of the bill due to the fact that UC can only be aquired when there are no objections from any given party. In the mean time i ask for a temporary injunction so this bill can go to the proper channels.
Handle immediately objected to this injunction, saying that the bill was "completely ridiculous". Later appealing this decision, saying "my wording was off what I’m trying to say is he has no grounds the bill was invalid". 
The court finally ruled in favor of Queen, citing "The bill comes out of dismissal since it should never be up to the VP to overrule a motion to UC. However, before it becomes back on the docket, the bill will be reformatted so it's more conform the template as most used. If a fixed template should be set, it should however be put in the new senate rules". S.R 016 was allowed to return to the Senate floor after reformatting the bill.
Category:District Court Cases