Power Inquiry Report

Power to the People, the Power Inquiry report was launched on February 27 2006.
The POWER Inquiry was set up in 2004 to explore how political participation and
involvement can be increased and deepened in Britain. POWER is funded by the Joseph
Rowntree Trusts to mark their centenary year. POWER is completely independent of any political
party or organisation. POWER has taken evidence from all major political parties, facilitated
community debates across the country, conducted polling, consulted senior academics and
experimented with new forms of decision-making to explore ways of engaging people with
politics. It has also attracted over 1,500 written submissions from the general public.
=== What the Inquiry found ===
Power to the People says that millions are turning away from voting and parties to campaigning
and alternative action because they have little influence over decisions affecting their lives.
=== Full list of Power Inquiry Recommendations ===
==== Rebalancing Power ====
There needs to be a re-balancing of power between the constituent elements of the political
system: a shift of power away from the Executive to Parliament and from central to local
government. Much greater clarity, transparency and accountability should be introduced into
the relationship between the Executive and supra-national bodies, quangos, business, and
interest groups. Too much power goes unchecked. The aim here is to allow the freedom for our
elected representatives to be the eyes, ears and mouth of British citizens at the heart of
government.
1. A Concordat should be drawn up between Executive and Parliament indicating where key
powers lie and providing significant powers of scrutiny and initiation for Parliament.
2. Select Committees should be given independence and enhanced powers including the
power to scrutinise and veto key government appointments and to subpoena witnesses to
appear and testify before them. This should include proper resourcing so that committees can
fulfill their remit effectively. The specialist committees in the Upper House should have the power
to co-opt people from outside the legislature who have singular expertise, such as specialist
scientists, when considering complex areas of legislation or policy.
3. Limits should be placed on the power of the whips.
4. Parliament should have greater powers to initiate legislation, to launch public inquiries and to
act on public petitions.
5. 70 per cent of the members of the House of Lords should be elected by a ‘responsive electoral
system’ (see 12 below) - and not on a closed party list system - for three parliamentary terms. To
ensure that this part of the legislature is not comprised of career politicians with no experience
outside politics, candidates should be at least 40 years of age.
6. There should be an unambiguous process of decentralisation of powers from central to local
government.
7. A Concordat should be drawn up between central and local government setting out their
respective powers.
8. Local government should have enhanced powers to raise taxes and administer its own
finances.
9. The Government should commission an independent mapping of quangos and other public
bodies to clarify and renew lines of accountability between elected and unelected authority.
10. Ministerial meetings with representatives of business including lobbyists to be logged and
listed on a monthly basis.
11. A new overarching select committee should be established to scrutinise the Executive’s
activities in supranational bodies and multilateral negotiations, particularly in relation to the
European Union, and to ensure these activities are held to account and conducted in the best
interests of the British people.
==== Real Parties and True Elections ====
The current way of doing politics is killing politics. An electoral and party system which is
responsive to the changing values and demands of today’s population should be created. This
will allow the development of new political alliances and value systems which will both
regenerate existing parties and also stimulate the creation of others.
12. A responsive electoral system - which offers voters a greater choice and diversity of parties
and candidates - should be introduced for elections to the House of Commons, House of Lords
and local councils in England and Wales to replace the first-past-the-post system.
13. The closed party list system to have no place in modern elections.
14. The system whereby candidates have to pay a deposit which is lost if their votes fall below a
certain threshold should be replaced with a system where the candidate has to collect the
signatures of a set number of supporters in order to appear on the ballot paper.
15. The Electoral Commission should take a more active role in promoting candidacy so that
more women, people from black and minority ethnic communities, people on lower incomes,
young people and independents are encouraged to stand.
16. The voting and candidacy age should be reduced to sixteen (with the exception of
candidacy for the House of Lords).
17. Automatic, individual voter registration at age sixteen should be introduced. This can be
done in tandem with the allocation of National Insurance numbers.
18. The citizenship curriculum should be shorter, more practical and result in a qualification.
19. Donations from individuals to parties should be capped at £10,000, and organisational
donations capped at £100 per member, subject to full democratic scrutiny within the
organisation.
20. State funding to support local activity by political parties should be introduced based on the
allocation of individual voter vouchers. This would mean that at a general election a voter will be
able to tick a box allocating a £3 donation per year from public funds to a party of his or her
choice to be used by that party for local activity. It would be open to the voter to make the
donation to a party other than the one they have just voted for.
21. Text voting or email voting should only be considered following other reform of our
democratic arrangements.
22. The realignment of constituency boundaries should be accelerated.
==== Downloading Power ====
We should be creating a culture of political engagement in which it becomes the norm for
policy and decision-making to occur with direct input from citizens. This means reform which
provides citizens with clear entitlements and procedures by which to exercise that input - from
conception through to implementation of any policy or decision.
23. All public bodies should be required to meet a duty of public involvement in their decision
and policy-making processes.
24. Citizens should be given the right to initiate legislative processes, public inquiries and hearings
into public bodies and their senior management.
25. The rules on the plurality of media ownership should be reformed. This is always a controversial
issue but there should be special consideration given to this issue in light of the developments in
digital broadcast and the internet.
26. A requirement should be introduced that public service broadcasters develop strategies to
involve viewers in deliberation on matters of public importance - this would be aided by the use
of digital technology.
27. MPs should be required and resourced to produce annual reports, hold AGMs and make
more use of innovative engagement techniques.
28. Ministerial meetings with campaign groups and their representatives should be logged and
listed on a monthly basis.
29. A new independent National Statistical and Information Service should be created to provide
the public with key information free of political spin.
30. ‘Democracy hubs’ should be established in each local authority area. These would be
resource centres based in the community where people can access information and advice to
navigate their way through the democratic system.
=== Comment ===
*Power to the People - or Just Another Consultation Exercise. Comment in response to the Power Inquiry recommendations from David Wilcox via his Designing for Civil Society blog. David's blog also mentions Comment on Power where you can leave comments about the Power recommendations. 
*Comments about the recommendations or any other aspect of this article here in this wiki can be included on its talk page.
References
*Power Inquiry press releases
category:Sustpedia
category:Community involvement