Squidturd has a gun

An anthropomorphic octopus who is drawn to have 6 tentacles instead of 8 and has drawn incredible inspiration via a different anthropomorphic octopus from the popular young aged homo sapien animated television series SpongeBob SquarePants whose name is similar to the homo sapien of the male gender name Edward but is structured differently due to the fact that he is similar to a squid but not really a squid and also draws his name from the stool disposed of by an animal is in the possession of a ranged weapon that is typically designed to pneumatically discharge solid projectiles from a shooting tube that contains a massive level of gas pressure is the sixth episode of animated spin-off television series of "Life in Bikini Bottom," Life in Bikini Top.
==Transcript==
*squidturd: Case against PhillyDanTheG, Yangster, and The Terrible Travis:
At the birth of the United Server of Discord, then known as the Primitive Fun and Games, a channel known as "cave-chat-moderator-only" was supposedly created to supplement discussion and oversight of the server between fellow moderators. This now deleted channel was to supposed to replicate the purpose of <#354053605478629377>, which was another official staff channel created at the time of the purpose of official discussion of server affairs between server administrators ("Dinosaurs").
In November of last year, after the inauguration of several individuals (of which are being prosecuted in this case) as moderators ("Cave Chat Moderators"), they engaged in a series of rogue and inappropriate behavior, spanning over a time frame of months.
These events happened while the channel was only visible to moderators, and somehow was invisible to me, as an administrator and higher-ranking official.
Exploiting this weakness in the server's settings, they personally insulted and attacked me. Yangster decided to use an @ everyone ping, which presumably would've pinged the entire server. The Terrible Travis used some instances of vulgar language in the channel, while PhillyDanTheG backstabbed, gossiped, and personally attacked individuals who could not view the area, *presumably* assuming the privacy would last.
Earlier today, while privatizing the channels in the Basement of this server to be viewable exclusively to supporters of the specific candidate and their role, I gave myself the moderator role in order to be able to complete this task.
Upon discovery, I questioned the existence of the channel, which I felt was strangely bizarre as I had never noticed it, and was curious for an elaboration.
During mid debate, Yangster deleted the channel, erasing all evidence which is a serious obstruction of justice charge.
For clarification on the usage of the moderator channel in question, it would be classified as an official channel because it was a channel created before proposals and community consensus were implemented, but also because it was privatized for the explicit and unequivocal purpose for appropriate discussion between server moderators related to the appropriate oversight and wellbeing of the community.
Another reason it was an official channel was because all future moderators would be able to see it and discuss within it. The original purpose of this official channel was for discussion between the moderators on the oversight and wellbeing of the server.
With the points thereof, that was the official purpose of the channel. With the moderators being trusted with their rights, being sworn an oath to execute the duties of the office "without any mental reservation, or purpose of evasion" and "well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office," a violation of a confidential channel would be a violation of the oath of office itself.
As previously mentioned, they utilized the channel for inappropriate purposes behind closed doors. They argue they had "freedom of speech." Well, they would have if they proposed to the server community to make that channel a playground for moderators.
They started abusing that channel *after* consensus was introduced, and hence they violated policy and order by doing that. In fact, because they didn't have the guts to propose anything and keep it secret, it's an acknowledgment that they wanted to exploit the channel in secrecy for their own personal purposes.
They know full well a motion to change the purpose of that confidential channel would be strongly opposed by the community.
Therefore, this plot happened without anyone knowing, and was fully illegal.
In the channel itself, they acknowledged that I would not be able to see it (which I must say, is a technical error of itself, as I am a higher ranking official), and hence it's an acknowledgment that their usage of the private channel was to exploit, rant, and commit treason to the fullest without anyone, no law enforcement (me in this case) discovering this misuse of an official channel. So their acknowledgment is another example of them acknowledging that they are abusing their trust and power and that they are evading law enforcement utilizing their moderator role (which allowed them to chat there in absolute secrecy).
Just to reiterate on the illegality of their actions, no channel, other than <#354053605478629377>, was private at the time. <#354053605478629377> is another example of a channel created for the staff of this server. Dinosaurs-only and the chat moderation channel were both created for the same purpose at this server's foundation.
If I never gave myself the moderator role, as I have today, I would've never discovered this scheme and it would've been left untouched for who knows how long.
This is a deliberate violation that cannot be undermined, ignored, or dismissed.
All parties involved should face accountability for their misuse of the moderator role. The three original delinquents set a poor example. By misusing the channel, they essentially promoted more misuse of it by future counterparts.
I am calling on the Supreme Court today as President of the United Server to implement a suspension of at least three days for each of these gentlemen.
These privileges entrusted to them have been abused, and hence this is no dismissive matter for any party, whatsoever.
(note, midway through this, I pressed on the Headquarters channel to review any other parts to this incident, but that resulted in half of my case being erased due to the 2,000 characters limit per message. While I've done my best to rewrite all of it, please excuse me if I've missed anything out.)
Golfpecks256
President of the United Server
*succbob: That is not a true patriot. Someone who supports destroying homosexuality is disgusting to hear. And for him to support impeachment because of that?! I'm astounded. He's trying to use a judicial tool for his own partisan beliefs. It's just going to help Republicans and the White House strengthen their case *against* impeachment. Wait a second, is your comment a joke? <@!197349317172920320> Senators didn't vote on impeachment yet, and Timothy Peppermint isn't real.
*squidturd: <@!197551406817869825> Can you take a little humor every now and then?
*succbob: EXCUSE ME.
Why are you all pinging, attacking, and impatiently expecting me to magicly come to life?! I am dealing with a lot, right now, and am very busy.
And I CANNOT even demote myself or promote Primitive to Dinosaur or Owner because I DO NOT have ownership!
This server's community is constantly toxic and immature. Kelpy, your seizure of power was clearly illegal so I'm not even going to debate that with you. Leave the server. Do what you want. Troll me. Ping me. Spam me. Accuse me. The last thing I need in life is to try and argue with a rude and reckless community.
I'm not going to further defend myself. I have wasted so many hours dealing with these ruthless, insensitive, and black-hearted attacks!
The comments I've read right there and in previous conversations are disgracefully appalling.
I'm already an admin on the Bidencord, where I have more meaningful discussions on politics. After a very long day, the last thing I need is for users to be crass and disgraceful.
GIVE ME A BREAK. STOP PUTTING THE BLAME ON ONE USER, AND JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS QUICKLY. I am sickened and will not administrate a community that will not cooperate.
So, I CANNOT FULFILL THIS REQUEST BECAUSE I AM NOT EVEN OWNER OF THE SERVER, and stop this ridiculous malfeasance every time I check this commonwealth.
I rarely type in capital letters, but you folks couldn't care less about how other people feel.
*squidturd: I ORDER YOU TO CHANGE ALL THE CHANNELS BACK AND STOP SPAMMING.
*succbob: That’s not even funny. None of your jokes are funny.
*squidturd: YOU!
*succbob: I am about to blow up like Benson.
*squidturd: You're a troll, and I'm not giving you any attention that you so badly want.
*succbob: As of October 21, 2019, I am rescinding my support for The Terrible Travis.
Let me start off by saying I was misinformed of The Terrible Travis and his history on this wiki. Travis has faced more global blocks, suspensions, and local blocks than any other user in existence on this wiki ever has.
But those are not my main reasons for no longer supporting him. First of all, Travis is not making an effort to edit on this wiki sufficiently. Many of you who claim global blocks are an excuse likely wouldn't support someone else for that same reason. The position of bureaucrat is the highest local wiki position, and with it comes a commitment. If Travis last contributed fanon or an actual quality edit back in July 2018, that is unheard of for a bureaucratic prospect.
Secondly, there have been a series of allegations raised against him. These hurt the credibility a bureaucratic candidate needs before the community can consider having him in such high power. There was an incident where a demotion request was raised against Travis, a bureaucrat at the time. Travis abusively used his bureaucratic powers to alter votes, falsify consensus, and fraudulently ban his critics, and abusively changed the site layout to something inappropriate. That is completely obscene.
Finally, this appalling thirst for revenge and power is fueling this candidate to do whatever he wants to get it. He abused his powers when he got a demotion request, and now, because he no longer has them, he's threatening to rally up his base and remove TheJasbre202 for his opposition to his request.
I believe Travis' attempts at interfering with consensus and elections has damaged the wiki and has set a precedent for others to follow. I strongly disavow his comments on removing Jasbre as a community because he opposed Travis' request. I'm not sure whether his comment was a threatening suggestion to force him to change his vote, or a reality, but nonetheless, it is ridiculous.
His defense statements also cause ridicule. The SBFW is governed by direct democracy. Everyone on the wiki votes on everything. It's not like you elect leaders who decide everything for you, which is representative democracy. Your elected officials don't decide the bureaucrat of the wiki. The people do.
Travis is acting as if this is the United States Congress or U.S. society in general, where folks vote out and demote people in order to get their demands, such as electing Travis as a bureaucrat in this scenario. If that was legal in direct democracy, then there wouldn't be a point of having consensus. But not only that, what Travis is doing is abusing his popularity to help with his personal interests. Every vote on SBFW should be counted. Jasbre should not be removed from his rightful position in order to penalize him for his opposition.
Travis' abuse of consensus in the past, and his abuse of power right now, has made him unfit for the office of bureaucrat.
Earlier this week, he partook in hostile efforts to ambush a former member of this wiki and cyber-attack them in response to their behavior on this wiki. Coming from a victim of these community attacks, myself, I know what it's like to get a consequence, but then get more than just that.
Travis has not displayed a sense of moral ethics that define the course and direction of a wiki, if he's elected bureaucrat. SBFW has looser regulations, but that doesn't mean we should condone abuses of power. Or ignore them.
Based on the recent actions, my final conclusion is that I will not be supporting Travis for bureaucrat. He has made no effort at contributing, and has damaged consensus and has played around with some dangerous nonsense.
He's request bureaucrat, a leadership position. We already have four qualified individuals serving as one. I wouldn't want an incompetent individual in a position that can only be demoted by Fandom Staff in emergencies.
Travis is not qualified to lead this wiki after his disgraceful past and his latest actions. His contributions to the division on this wiki in the past and present have been unhelpful. He does not have the ability to unify this wiki once and for all.
That is all I will say for now. I veto his sudden application for Bureaucrat, after no valuable contributions and skipping all roles with the request.
*squidturd: Travis, it's clear what I meant when I said inappropriate. Do you think it's appropriate to put somebody's face as a background, or do you think it's inappropriate?
I already said my apologies if you thought I was saying that because it was specifically your face, when I was actually referring to the dangerous nonsense you were doing as a bureaucrat.
Instead of constantly violating the wiki policies, why can't you stop trying to get a leader position that you abusively abused a mere few months ago? You're trying to skip the commitment, dodge the criticism, and meddle with the consensus to advance your request to success and your interests.
How many times have you requested this position, Travis? What defense statement can you make that proves you are willing to serve on the position to the best of your ability? And how did those past tenures end? I've been on this wiki long enough to know that most (or maybe even all) of your tenures have ended on a demotion request, a global block, or some sort of chaotic controversy plaguing this wiki, and the values that you are running on in your request have not been the ones you've set in the past.
You've had many chances to serve well as a bureaucrat. You chose not to, and play around with the role, abusing the powers that come with it. There are four competent bureaucrats. That's already enough, so the only reason to have five is if you bring something extraordinary to the table. You've done no commitment. Why can't you let users who've worked their way up the hierarchy of roles and are fully committed to this wiki get a chance to become bureaucrat than you shamefully neglecting the commitment and skipping ahead to request like that? And how many chances have you had at being a decent bureaucrat, and how many more chances do you think you need?
Your clear desperation for power on this wiki doesn't resonate well with me, nor does your past or your actions.
*succbob: Dan, your response is hostile, toxic, and completely needless. It's what incites drama in the first place. Do you want to be the root or the fuel to the chaos that engulfs this wiki often? Do you always need to act so cruel and hostile towards people you disagree with?
That should not be coming from a SpongeBob Fanon Wiki bureaucrat.
*squidturd: wait a minute why are we still doing this i have a gun i can just pew pew you
[shoots succbob]'
*succbob: fucjeiwbendkckkkkkkkk
*EBs Dad: rip.... Impeachment of big bill hell's#7777, Vice President of the Server & Community:
This individual has a long history of personal attacks, insults, derogatory statements, obscene comments, widespread disturbances and disruption, and a lack of forethought.
When he was Vice President-Elect, he exemplified concerning statements that raised red flags, claiming to destroy the government, the constitution and our laws, and take a full strangle hold of all power here, completely disregarding consensus.
Today (or yesterday), he engaged in a massive act of vandalism, removing users, channels, dissolving the government, removing role colors, changing role names, demoting users, and making the presidency and vice presidency and the executive branch a tyrannical institution with sole and absolute power on this community.
When he was running for the office, he kept his intentions simple: to simply remove "red tape." He was the user that proposed restoring the government, and the community agreed. Now, without consensus, destroying the government infers he only wanted it restored so he could grab power and take it away from everyone else.
We have discussed a ban on him several times, and he has, in fact, been kicked / banned numerous times, and warned dozens more. However, I feel it would be imperative to this server and its prosperity to at least impeach and remove Bill from the office of Vice President and subject him to a normal optional review afterwards of his abusive conduct and whether he should still be allowed here (that will be a separate discussion, of course).
FYI. This discussion is for the impeachment of Bill, not his removal from the server.
I firmly believe, as I have in the past, that Bill is not competent and respectful of consensus here, and now some of his destructive actions may not be able to be reversed that easily. He has been warned more times than I can count. Including warnings that his manifesto he was spouting in the days leading up to his inauguration would be unconstitutional and fully and unequivocally illegal.
Therefore, with his deliberate actions and stronghold of the government, server, and community, he should impeached and removed from the office, immediately.
[episode finally fucking ends]
Category:DanzxvFan8275
Category:Episodes
Category:Episode transcripts
Category:Transcripts
Category:2020
Category:2020 Episodes
Category:2020 Transcripts
Category:Episodes written by DanzxvFan8275
Category:Life in Bikini Top
Category:UltraFuse
Category:Spectromite Studios
Category:@everyone DEADLINE 🚨🚨🚨🚨 Productions
Category:I Simp For Juicy Titties
Category:2020s