Triecclesial Court

A Triecclesial Court is a rare legal instrument of Church law and about the only instance where church law can extend power over the nobility. 
==Constitution==
* a triecclesial court is convened when matters of high moral or political consequence need to be set up with the appropriate legal backing. 
* these courts always consists of one representative each of each human church, that is Temple Verata, Temple Belligra and Temple Jansahar.
* usually, the Belligra will represent the victim / prosecution, the Verata will defend the accused, while the Jansahar sit in judgement, though these roles can be shifted if the case demands
* a verdict is reached when all three parties / all three churches agree
* a triecclesial verdict is considered to be morally and theologically beyond reproach and while not technically binding to the nobility is usually respected. 
* most triecclesial verdicts have become the basis for a bannbulle, ie see The Condamnation of the Soul Eaters
==History==
* The basic idea stems from a famous quote of Emperor Ravindra Virasana: 'The day that noble law bows to church law is the day that the three churches agree on one thing'. It was based on the notion that at that time (the late 1600s), all three churches were fiercely battling each other and often enough gave the impression to disagree on general purposes. 
* It led to the first triecclesial verdict in 1767 ET, during the reign of his grandson Rupinder Virasana, who accepted the ruling with the equally famous words: 'You'll get away with it this time, but never again.'
==Snippets==
==Other Articles on the Triecclesial Court==
Triecclesial Court
Category:Events
Category:Religions
Category:Legalities