De masticatione mortuorum in tumulis

M. Michaelis Ranfftii, V. D. M.
DE MASTICATIONE MORTUORUM IN TUMULIS, 
(Oder von dem Bauen und Sdmaßen Der Todten in Gräbern,) 
LIBER SINGULARIS: Exhibens Duas Exercitationes, Prior HISTORICO-CRITICA Posterior PHILOSOPHICA Quarum Est.
LIPSIÆ, Sumptibus Augusti Martini, 1728
M. Michaelis Ranfftii, V. D. M.
DE MASTICATIONE MORTUORUM IN TUMULIS, 
(Oder von dem Bauen und Sdmaßen Der Todten in Gräbern,) 
LIBER SINGULARIS: Exhibens Duas Exercitationes,
Prior HISTORICO-CRITICA
Posterior PHILOSOPHICA Quarum Est.
LIPSIÆ, Sumptibus Augusti Martini, 1728	
M. Michael Ranfts
TRACTAT of the Chewing and smacking the dead in graves, 
In what the true nature their Hungarians
VAMPYRS and Blood sucker shown,
All of this matter exposed scriptures to be reviewed.
Prior historical-critical
The second PHILOSOPHICAL this is.
London: Printed Augustus Martini, 172
== Index ==
Coming Soon. This is as far as I've gotten -- 16th July 2020
Page: 	Jump to a	section: 	 	 	
Main Page: 	PRÆFAMEN 	PRAEFATIO	Copy Source	Translation Notes	Citations
Part 1 Sections 1-10 	§. I. 	§. II. 	§. III. 	§. IV. 	§. V.
 	§. VI. 	§. VII. 	§. VIII. 	§. IX. 	§. X.
Part 1 Sections 11-20 	§. XI. 	§. XII. 	§. XIII. 	§. XIV. 	§. XV.
 	§. XVI. 	§. XVII. 	§. XVIII. 	§. XIX. 	§. XX.
Part 1 Sections 21-30 	§. XXI 	§. XXII 	§. XXIII 	§. XXIV 	§. XXV
 	§. XXVI 	§. XXVII 	§. XXVIII 	§. XXIX 	§. XXX
Part 1 Sections 31-40 	§. XXXI 	§. XXXII 	§. XXXIII 	§. XXXIV 	§. XXXV
 	§. XXXVI 	§. XXXVII	§. XXXVIII 	§. XXXIX 	§. XL
Part 1 Sections 41-53 	§. XLI 	§. XLII 	§. XLIII 	§. XLIV 	§. XLV
 	§. XLVI 	§. XLVII 	§. XLVIII 	§. XLIX 	§. L
 	§. LI. 	§. LII. 	§. LIII. 	 	
Part 2 Sections 1-10 	§. I 	§. II 	§. III 	§. IV 	§. V
 	§. VI 	§. VII 	§. VIII 	§. IX 	§. X
Part 2 Sections 11-20 	§. XI 	§. XII 	§. XIII 	§. XIV 	§. XV
 	§. XVI 	§. XVII 	§. XVIII 	§. XIX 	§. XX
Part 2 Sections 21-30 	§. XXI 	§. XXII 	§. XXIV 	§. XXV 	§. XXVI
 	§. XXVII 	§. XXVIII	§. XXIX 	§. XXX 	§. XXIII
Part 2 Sections 31-40 	§. XXXI 	§. XXXII 	§. XXXIII 	§. XXXIV 	§. XXXV
 	§. XXXVI 	§. XXXVII	§. XXXVIII 	§. XXXIX 	§. XL
Part 2 Sections 41-50 	§. XLI 	§. XLII 	§. XLIII 	§. XLIV 	§. XLV 
 	§. XLVI 	§. XLVII 	§. XLVIII 	§. XLIX 	§. L
Part 2 Sections 51-59 	§. LI 	§. LII 	§. LIII 	§. LIV 	§. LV
 	§. LVI 	§. LVII 	§. LVIII 	§. LIX 	
Part 3 Sections 1-10 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
Part 3 Sections 1-10 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
Part 3 Sections 11-20 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
 	§.  	§.  	§.  	§.  	§. 
Part 3 Letters 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Notes Refs and Further Reading	 	 	 	 	
== Consecratio ==
Tres Romae scholarium magni Dei, sicut in magno, dominae, exaltauit et honorauit generosum recta MR Friedrich Börner,
Et scribam sancta Doctori Professori Publico Primario, et cervicem alta cathedralem ad Mysnensis dyocesis Canonico, et ad Curiae Hochfürstl. Assessori consistorii zu Leipzig Saxonum, qui Churfürstl. Saxonum eruditione singu Ephoro magna Collegiato Collegii-Fürsten, Universitatis Leipzig Decemviro Bibliothecario et sicut tota gente Francorum seniori etc.
Maxime exaltavit me viri nobiles patroni ephorates multifaceted.
Sicut Magnifico VI, Mysterium fidei, et exaltabitur Dominus lectulis et honoratus:
MR Heinrich Klausing, sancti, et scribæ Doctori Professori Publico Ordinario, ad cervicem alta cathedralem ad Mysnensis dyocesis Canonico, et operis suffragiorum facillime possessor Ephoro doctrina, in Facultate theologica p. T. Decano, magna-Prince Collegii Collegiato: de Universitate Tehn et in tota natione Saxonum seniori meo cetera praecipue exaltatum Domino et auferte omnem civitatem.
Et tandem ad magnifica, Mysterium fidei, Sit pius et exaltauit et honorauit Domino Deyling MR ad Salomonem: Sacrae Litterae et Doctori Professori Publico Ordinario, ex in altum Stiffts Zeitz Ecclesiae Canonico, & Regia Curiae, in Saxonici Lipsia per consistorii Assessori, Natione seniori ad Mysnensis dyocesis, in ecclesia S. Nicolai Pastori et tota pelagus Romae dioeces highly iussa erant fieri et praefecti satis fida etc.
Maxime exaltavit me viri nobiles ingenio ducis parochiali.
=== Dedication: ===
To the big ones Leipzig
Good scholars, As the great, venerable, Exalted Lord and Scholar, MR Christian Friedrich Börner,
Doctors and Professors
HERRN Christian Friedrich Börner, Doctors and Professors of the The Holy Scripture being Primary Audience of the high cathedral of Meißen canonical, Princely Saxon Consistorii Leipzig Assessori, which Chur fürstl. Saxon scholarship holders Ephori, the great prince college Collegiata, the University of Leipzig and librarian, as well as the entire Franconian nation seniors etc. My particularly exalted gentleman, noble patron and multifaceted ephorates. 
In the same The Magnifico, Venerable, Exalted Stretcher and Exalted Lord, MR Heinrich Klausing, The holy writings Doctori and Professori Publico Ordinario, the high cathedral stiff to Meissen Canonico, their electoral scholarship holders Ephoro, the theological faculty p. t. Decano, the great Prince Collegii Collegiato, the University of Tehn and the entire Saxon Nation Seniori etc. My particularly exalted Lord and make the church.
And finally To the great, high-honored, devout in God, exalted and honored Lord, MR Salomon Deyling, The holy writings of Doctori and Professori Publico Ordinario, the high Stiffts Church at Zeitz Canonico, the Chur and Prince Electoral Saxon Consistorii at Leipzig Assessori, the Meissen Nation Seniori, the main Church at St. Nicolai Pastori and the entire Leipzig Diœces and highly ordained highly respectable superintendents etc.
To my particularly exalted gentleman, noble parish and versatile leader.
== Legentibus. ==
Lectorem meum. Dissertatio medica de me tenuit in publicum Masticatione Mortuorum in in tumulis XXVII Septembris, MDCCXXV in Leipzig, et secundum eam mira quaedam ex Hungarn casum. Sed quia non omnis rei tunc contendo autem ius etiam repentina profectio mea Lipsia quo prohibitus sum formae Anno 1728. quae in carta inde educti a tractus titulus: de Masticatione Mortuorum in tumulis Liber singularis, continens duas Dissertationes, quarum prior Commentatio Historico-Critica, Philosophica Quae vero est posterius; patere. Etsi non puto quod ex stylo in hac causa opus est uti in relatione ad actum, sic, ut dicitur in Vampyres Servien, emerged quae olim mihi potestatem scribere in tractatu meo quae variis scriptis in lucem partim malos boni. Quae res ad defendere contra me iniquas hypothesi iudiciorum suorum aliquos, tum ex ea explicare fabulam Vampyres. Eoque consilio mundum curiosis manibus dedi litteras, que tria quasi. Germanica habet partem in prima translatione Latina mei in tumulis Tractats de Masticatione Mortuorum. Et aliud est tabella, quasi relatione ad Vampyres fundatur in principiis mihi in hypothesi et tertia dona omnia scripta ut non ad lumen Vampyres in brevi excerpt, simul et sumpserunt occasionem impugnare defendere impugnantes. Spero autem scripta sunt, ut non displiceat, aut iniucundum qui legit, et nihil possum reperire adde huc, quam ut me sibi commendatissimum habeat ad bene legit honore.
Nebra June X, MDCCXXXIII.
=== Dear Reader. ===
Benevolent Reader,
I had held a public dissertation de Masticatione mortuorum in tumulis on September 27, 1725 in Leipzig, and had based it on a certain wonderful Casum from Hungarn. But because I didn’t go into all this matter at that time, but reserved the right to dispute it again, which I was prevented by my unexpected departure from Leipzig, I have Anno 1728. everything that I brought of it in paper form a tract entitled: de Masticatione mortuorum in tumulis Liber singularis, continens duas Dissertationes, quarum prior Historico-Critica, posterior vero Philosophica est; exposed. Although I did not think that I needed to use the pen in this matter, the act-like relation of the so-called vampyres in Servien, which emerged some time ago, gave me the opportunity to write my tractate in various writings that have been brought to light, partly in good part in bad. This prompted me to defend my hypothesis against the unequal judgments of some adversaries, as well as to explain the story of the vampyres from it. And with this intention I put the curious world in the hands of the script, which consists of three parts, as it were. The first part contains the German translation of my Latin Tractats de Masticatione mortuorum in tumulis. The other explains the file-like relation of the vampyres based on the principles of my hypothesis, and the third presents all the writings that have come to light by the vampyres in a short excerpt, at the same time I took the opportunity to oppose some To defend opponents. I hope that these writings will not be displeasing or unpleasant to the reader, so I can find nothing more to add here than to recommend myself to the well-honored reader.
Nebra Nov. 10, 1733.
== PRÆFAMEN. ==
Primum gantzen De Praefatio ad Parthos tractatus decem.
Lector,
Libera nos in hoc tractu forma, quam promisit primum in dissertatione ostendimus. Nolite mirari hoc quia sub terris ita est periculosum iter quod ducit per tot vastas deserta invia. Si cognovissetis subterraneis locis cum primum de nobis, ut ea morum confusione dignum vitasse aut parum prosperis, qui prius cum suis Lipsiam Literatam quidam auctores sunt Actorum Lipsiensium dimisit illis Academica. Aegre eo quod forte videtur materiam manducationem et tulerunt cadaver sapientes quierunt. Alioquin non putavit nos cupiditas gloriae cupidine laudis instar est huiusmodi. Qui honos labore. Interim non terrentur visu tumulis cum fortuna nostra descenderit. Nos autem reversus es, et bene conscientiam ab his quae diximus esse peccatum. Sed non potest iudicare utrum fatum simul habuimus aliquando finguntur Orpheus, Eurydicen suam propter se subducit ex inferno, et priusquam id scirem adhuc. Quia modicam habes fiduciam habemus in nostra scientia censoris. Quod fieri non potest quicquam de Leyer quia insatiabilia vocibus. At te, lector, valete et nobis quoque fidus manet studiosi.
=== Preface. ===
The first preface to Das gantzen Tractate.
Dear reader,
We deliver this in the form of a tract, which we promised in our first dissertation. You should not be surprised that we have been under the earth for so long that the journey there is very dangerous because it leads us through many impassable wastes and deserted places. If we had known this when we went to the subterranean areas for the first time, we might have avoided the confusion that our censor worthy of us, or who is the one who gave his Lipsiam Literature with unsuccessful success than before certain authors have released their Acta Lipsiensium Academica. Perhaps he seems to have resented the fact that we took away the matter from chewing and smacking the dead in graves. Otherwise he would not have accused us of a desire for fame, as if we were only out of a desire for fame and the like. Honor that hard work. In the meantime we were not frightened by the sight of the graves, but with good luck we descended to them. Now we come back from those and are well aware of what we have been reminded of. However, others may judge whether we had the same fate as Orpheus once, because he was hauling his Eurydice from hell, and before he knew it again. Because we have little confidence in the skill of our censors. It is part of the Leyer and cannot be done by anything, because melodious voices are satisfied. But you, dear reader, farewell and remain loyal to our studios.
== PRAEFATIO ==
Die erstere Dissertation, Historisch und Critisch ist, ward auf der Universität zu Leipzig den 27. Sept. 1725. öffentlich gehalten, Wobey Hr. Christian Gottfr. Cleemann von Chemnitz, S. S. Theol. Stud. Respondente gewesen.	FIRST DEBATE: The former dissertation, historical and critical, was held publicly at the University of Leipzig on September 27, 1725. Wobey Hr. Christian Gottfr. Cleemann von Chemnitz, S. S. Theol. Stud. Respondent.
PRAEFATIO.
Miraberis, RENEVOLE LECTOR, non mireris, lector, quod circa hoc subjectum est profectus linteum magnum nempe tot controversias habent si ego satis faciam.
Ipsa natura docet consequenter disciplina quae maxime occulta cognoscere naturam sive culpa qui se dies noctesque occupatus modis. Quid igitur putas de me, qui sum reus verum Deum, et non dubitamus officia et examen de eius occultatum maxime vires in natura? Sed quoniam grammaticus audeat facere debet videri mirum tibi feci et sapientes mandendo aliena doctrina admodum gravis et sepulcra mortuorum, quantum potest.
Statim placuit scribere ad recensendum quaedam publica catheder defendere. Vix me solum quia capta est opus in manu: ego vidi, magna ita ut nihil in me remansit vir unus, repositum in penetralibus permanere. Vos igitur et interpretationem eius indicabimus unhappily non merito, amice lector, quia supplet vos cum duabus dissertationibus de hac re mihi, una est et discrimine rerum gestarum scriptor et alii, qui tam philosophicis maturetur. Primum fit, quod unus sit vena tua in facie arcus. Nec levabis oculos tuos ad opus prius, sed non tantum dant operam ad eam. Quod temporis angustiae plura fuisse impedimento quod eam diligentiam adhibere potui quam debuit. Ergo non ulla imaginatione ad aliquam eruditionis laudem gloriam et dum opus videtur Placet nequiquam carentibus lector. Promitto me omnia haec certa magis: quia cuiuslibet auctoris, qui est in momento, et non sciunt aliquid speciale hac re scripsi ad D. This document M., Titus Flavius ​​Marck Ranstadt, qui dedit etiam huius dissertationis A. Lipsiae MDCLXXIX ad Gymnasium nostrum, quod inscribitur: Diss. Commentatio Historico-Philosophica De Masticatione Mortuorum.
Multa prius ut serviant mihi expectabam supellectili Cum aspicerem acrius invenimus multa promiserat, sed parum. Huiusmodi facere velis credere atque commendari vena si accipiatur primo, magis magisque paulum fortasse est.
=== Prelim Translation: Foreword ===
YOU will be surprised, dear reader, why I set out to deal with such a subject in this sheet, which involves so many and great controversies that I will have to do it if I am to do it enough. It is part of the teaching of nature and consequently of a discipline, the secrets of which even the best person who quits nature will not investigate whether he is occupied with it day and night throughout life. 
So what will you think of me, who am responsible for the truth of God, and yet have no hesitation in undertaking the examination of its most hidden powers in nature? However, since a scholar should dare to do everything, it must not seem so strange to you that I have dealt with this heavy and extremely strange doctrine of chewing and smacking the dead in graves, as much as can be done. I have had a very good opportunity to do so, since we have recently been made aware of such a strange work of nature in the public newspapers that I believe that such things were hardly ever noticed on dead bodies. I immediately decided to write some of it and defend it for rehearsal on public catheder. Alone since I had hardly taken the work in hand, I saw myself in such a wide field that I could not stay in the closets of a one-thesis. 
You will therefore not interpret it unhappily, dear reader, that I am supplying you with two dissertations of this subject, one that is historical and critical, and the other that is so philosophical. The first is the one that comes to your face in current arches. You won't look at the work before, but you won't pay much attention to it. The shortage of time and other circumstances have been a hindrance to the fact that I could not apply diligence to it as it should have been. I therefore do not have the slightest imagination to gain some praise or glory for scholarship, but I am satisfied if only my work does not seem to you in vain and annoying, dear reader. I promise this all the more certain, because at the moment I do not know of any author who wrote anything special about this matter as Mr. M. Philip Rohr, von Marck-Ranstadt, who also gave a dissertation of this A. 1679 at our University of Leipzig, which is entitled: Diss. Historico-Philosophica de Masticatione mortuorum.
At first I looked for many in it that should serve in my stuff; but since I looked at her more closely, I found that although she had promised a lot, she had accomplished little. In doing things like this, you want to be recommended to current work and believe that, if this first attempt is accepted, you may have to wait a little more thoroughly and better with God.
== Contentus hac dissertatione. ==
Contentus hac dissertatione.
* §. I. occulta naturae viribus.
* §. II. Vel omnes, non propter Deum, sive diaboli.
* §. III. A valde specialis est ad exemplum Enthusiasmi poetici.
* §. IV. Potest ex ignorantia negationis rei ignarus.
* §. V. Omnium animos in corpora invicem.
* §. VI. VII. Variae formae sympathiae et antipathiae.
* §. VIII. Um sapientes et mortuorum cur dubites trahitur.
* §. IX. Et orthodoxissimus receptus est. De mirabilibus Dei a ABSURDUS quae in natura potest clare distinguantur.
* §. X. Papa Spiritus est fides.
* §. XI. Exemplum rememorando secum et sapientes ex mortuis.
* §. XII. Mirum apud ipsum de Hungarn exemplum.
* §. XIII. A. cursum instituendo rationem ponere.
* §. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. Et sapientes, et cibum mortuorum non est divinum miraculum approbetur.
* §. XVIII. XIX. XX. XXI. aliud signum diaboli.
* §. XXII. XXIII. XXIV. Daemonibus spiritus medii abdicavit. Quam multa tribuere, idem est hic. Garmannus.
* §. XXV. Pravas opiniones refutantur. Ruminant et mortui in sepulcris sapere?
* §. XXVI. Antiqua Sarmatarum regione vicerunt. Vox animarum. Homerus. Diogenes Laertius. Lucianus. Sophoclis Antigona.
* §. XI. XXVII. Quam multa superstitione habebant can facere? Ex qua sub bangs.
* §. XXVIII. Argenteus Meteoron.
* §. XXIX. XXX. Populi imagination. Et horror. Et pulsanti mortuorum in sepulcris.
* §. XXXI. Num mortuus cibum in vestimenta.
* §. XXXII. XXXIII. Et ille caprum emissarium, comedere carnes. Etiam Judaica mus.
* §. XXXIV. Et Muhamedans. Angelus mortuus est. Et sub terra nito.
* §. XXXV. Quod spiritus Eurynomus idoli. Quod spiritus Asuiti. Pausanias.
* §. XXXVI. Habere poterant animalia. Hyæna. 
* §. XXXVII. Et Striges, cruor-lactans aves. 
* §. XXXVIII. In carne vescuntur angues Pressit, utrum ex homine crescere Marck. Wolffgang Franzius.
* §. XXXIX. A monumentum ut Mysnensis dyocesis.
* §. XL. Mortuus est, et ebibent mantilibus linteo.
* §. XLI. Quod animalia sub terra. Et mures inclusi essent.
* §. XLII. XLIII Serpentes in corpora humana. De mortis causa a mortuis.
* §. XLV. XLIV. Quod genus feminam. Et Rohrius Pitzschmann. Superstitionis causas. Key arce. Garmann.
* §. XLVII. XLVIII. Rememorando secum, et quod sapientes ex eo tempore mortua est plaga. Huius atrocitas tanta sit quanta. Rivinus. Helmont. Geyer.
* §. XLIX. Turci uero, ut nolite timere a plaga. Carl vom-Insecta Engel.
* §. L. LI. Putredinem corpus siue plaga? A Lapide.
* §. LII. Et sapientes, et cibum mortuorum, sive related erit in morte?
* §. LIII. Finis. Dissertatio medica promitto tibi de aliis. 
Q.D.B.V.
=== This dissertation content. ===
* §. 1.  the hidden secret of nature.
* §. 2. Or else all, it is not for the sake of God, whether it be diaboli.
* §. 3. A very special model to fanaticisms poetici.
* §. 4. Can come from the ignorance of negation of the thing ignarus.
* §. 5. invicem. look for bodies. 
* §. 6. 7. Different types of sympathy and antipathiae
* §. 8. Um wise and the dead doubt that trahitur.
* §. 9. The most orthodox. Marvels of the grotesque in nature, which can be clearly distinguantur.
* §. 10. Pope is the fides.
* §. 11. An example of storing in his memory, and the wise men out of mortuis.
* §. 12. A strange about Hungarn exemplum.
* §. 13. The establishment of the ponere.
* §. 14. 15. 16. 17. The wise and the food is wonderful approbetur.
* §. 18. 19. 20. 21. Another sign diaboli.
* §. 22. 23. 24. Demons of the middle office. How much there is to distribute, willing inquiry is the same. Garmannus.
* §. 25. Erroneous beliefs are refuted. Chew the dead in their graves wise? 
* §. 26. Ancient Sarmatians. The voice of souls. Homer. Diogenes. Lucian. Sophoclis Antigona.
* §. 21. 27. How many things that they had a can perform a self-imposed worship? Out of the bangs.
* §. 28. Silver Meteoron.
* §. 29. 30. The imagination. The horror. It will be dead on sepulcris.
* §. 31. In vestimenta.§ dead meat. 32. 33. He was the goat to eat. The Jewish mus.
* §. 34. The Mohammedans. Angel died. The underground nito.§. 35. That spirit Eurynomus idol. That spirit Asui. Pausanias.
* §. 36. Carnivorous animals. Hyæna. 
* §. 37. Screech, blood-sucking birds. 
* §. 38. In the flesh eating snakes, whether the person grow Marck. Wolffgang Franzius.
* §. 39. A monument to the diocese dyocesis.
* §. 40. Died, and the robber towels linteo.
* §. 41. The animals underground. The rats essent.
* §. 42. 43 snake into human bodies. The cause of death from mortuis.
* §. 45. 44. And this kind of a female. The Rohrer Pitzschmann. Superstitious reasons. Key castle. Garmann.
* §. 47. 48. Storing in his memory, and that at that time, is dead, being the wise men from the plague. The relentlessness of truth, as was. Rivinus. HELMONT. Geyer.
* §. 49. The Turks, however, so do not be afraid of that plague. Carl vom-Engel.
* §. 50. insecticide. 
* §. 51. Putrefaction or stroke? A Lapide.
* §. 52. The wise, the meat of the dead, whether it be related to the death? 
* §. 53. The end Dissertation promise yourself from others.
Q.D.B.V.
== Copy Source ==
M. Michaelis Ranfftii, V. D. M. De Masticatione Mortuorum In Tumulis (Oder von dem Kauen und Schmatzen Der Todten in Gräbern,) Liber Singularis Exhibens Duas Exercitationes, Quarum Prior Historico-Critica Posterior Philosophica est 
* Ranft, Michael (1700-1774) 
* Lipsiae : Sumptibus Augusti Martini, 1728 
* https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-uba001502-0 
M. Michaelis Ranfftii, V. D. M.
DE MASTICATIONE MORTUORUM IN TUMULIS, 
(Oder von dem Bauen und Sdmaßen Der Todten in Gräbern,) 
LIBER SINGULARIS: Exhibens Duas Exercitationes
Prior HISTORICO-CRITICA Posterior
PHILOSOPHICA Quarum Est.
LIPSIÆ, Sumptibus Augusti Martini, 1728	Michael Ranfftius, M. V. D.
Treatise on the chewing and smacking of the dead in graves,
(Or of building and measuring the dead in graves)
BOOK OF INDIVIDUAL: A two exercises
prior historical-second PHILOSOPHICAL this is.
London: Printed Augustus Martini, 1728
* Universitätsbibliothek Augsburg 
* Universitätsstraße 22 86159 
* Augsburg digbib@bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de
* http://www.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de 
=== Additional Material: ===
Additional material and sections come from the German edition: Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern, Worin die wahre Beschaffenheit derer Hungarischen Vampyrs und Blut-Sauger gezeigt, Auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden 1734
* Title Michael Ranfts Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern worin d. wahre Beschaffenheit derer hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger gezeigt, auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden
* Author Ranft, Michael (1700-1774)
* Imprint Leipzig : Teubner, 1734
* Extent 291 S. : Ill.
* Shelfmark H61/TREW.Mx 95
* Link to This Work http://digital.bib-bvb.de/webclient/DeliveryManager?custom_att_2=simple_viewer&pid=2715028
* Standard Number VD18 11362324-003
* Further Link Digital Collections of the University Library Erlangen-Nueremberg In Online Public Access Catalogue http://gateway-bayern.de/BV009191967
== Translation Notes ==
I know. It's not that great, in fact some you are probably laughing at my attempts. 
I've got an OCR pen that hates this type set and I'm going line by line in Google Translate. It's not just copy-pasting though, I am trying to fix the ocr errors and shit where I can. 
== Citations ==
=== Text: (main) ===
* Chicago: Ranft, Michael. De Masticatione Mortuorum in Tumulis. Leipzig: August Martini, 1728.
* APA: Ranft, M. (1728). De masticatione mortuorum in tumulis. August Martini.
* MLA: Ranft, Michael. De Masticatione Mortuorum in Tumulis. August Martini, 1728.
* Harvard: Ranft, M. (1728) De masticatione mortuorum in tumulis. Leipzig: August Martini.
=== Source: (main) ===
* Chicago: "De Masticatione Mortuorum In Tumulis". 2020. Digiviewer V 0.6.4 Nbn-Resolving.Org. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-uba001502-0.
* APA: De Masticatione Mortuorum In Tumulis. Digiviewer V 0.6.4 Nbn-resolving.org. (2020). Retrieved 25 June 2020, from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-uba001502-0.
* MLA: "De Masticatione Mortuorum In Tumulis". Digiviewer V 0.6.4 Nbn-Resolving.Org, 2020, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-uba001502-0. Accessed 25 June 2020.
* Harvard: Digiviewer V 0.6.4 Nbn-resolving.org. 2020. De Masticatione Mortuorum In Tumulis. [online] Available at: <https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-uba001502-0> [Accessed 25 June 2020].
=== Text: (additional) ===
* Chicago: Ranft, Michael. Michael Ranfts Tractat Von Dem Kauen Und Schmatzen Der Todten in Gräbern: Worin d. Wahre Beschaffenheit Derer Hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger Gezeigt, Auch Alle Von Dieser Materie Bißher Zum Vorschein Gekommene Schrifften Recensiret Werden. Leipzig: Teubner, 1734.
* APA: Ranft, M. (1734). Michael Ranfts Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern: worin d. wahre Beschaffenheit derer hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger gezeigt, auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden. Teubner.
* MLA: Ranft, Michael. Michael Ranfts Tractat Von Dem Kauen Und Schmatzen Der Todten in Gräbern: Worin d. Wahre Beschaffenheit Derer Hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger Gezeigt, Auch Alle Von Dieser Materie Bißher Zum Vorschein Gekommene Schrifften Recensiret Werden. Teubner, 1734.
* Harvard: Ranft, Michael (1734): Michael Ranfts Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern: worin d. wahre Beschaffenheit derer hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger gezeigt, auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden. Leipzig: Teubner.
=== Source: (additional) ===
* Chicago: . “Michael Ranfts Tractat Von Dem Kauen Und Schmatzen Der Todten in Gräbern Worin d. Wahre Beschaffenheit Derer Hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger Gezeigt, Auch Alle Von Dieser Materie Bißher Zum Vorschein Gekommene Schrifften Recensiret Werden.” DigiTool Stream Gateway . Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg. Accessed July 16, 2020. http://digital.bib-bvb.de/webclient/DeliveryManager?custom_att_2=simple_viewer.
* APA: Ranft, M. Michael Ranfts Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern worin d. wahre Beschaffenheit derer hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger gezeigt, auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden. DigiTool Stream Gateway . http://digital.bib-bvb.de/webclient/DeliveryManager?custom_att_2=simple_viewer.
* MLA: Ranft, Michael. “Michael Ranfts Tractat Von Dem Kauen Und Schmatzen Der Todten in Gräbern Worin d. Wahre Beschaffenheit Derer Hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger Gezeigt, Auch Alle Von Dieser Materie Bißher Zum Vorschein Gekommene Schrifften Recensiret Werden.” DigiTool Stream Gateway , Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, digital.bib-bvb.de/webclient/DeliveryManager?custom_att_2=simple_viewer.
* Harvard: Ranft, Michael (n.d.): „Michael Ranfts Tractat von dem Kauen und Schmatzen der Todten in Gräbern worin d. wahre Beschaffenheit derer hungar. Vampyrs u. Blut-Sauger gezeigt, auch alle von dieser Materie bißher zum Vorschein gekommene Schrifften recensiret werden“. DigiTool Stream Gateway . Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg Retrieved am 16.07.2020 from http://digital.bib-bvb.de/webclient/DeliveryManager?custom_att_2=simple_viewer.
Category:De masticatione mortuorum in tumulis
Category:Full Text: De masticatione mortuorum in tumulis
Category:Michael Ranft
Category:Resource
Category:Citations Page