DemocritusFitnessPost

Category:TauTology
POST:
if every human were to die tomorrow and lets say all conciousness vanish would the number 4 also disappear? Does the number 7 exist in actual reality or does it only exist because somebody knows about it. 
== chaos theory ==
=== lasjkdf ===
=== asdf ===
=== post 30 ===
=== asdf ===
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/d5724a415b1845b6/5bc7412a2691003a#5bc7412a2691003a
On Feb 8, 11:50 pm, "David Hare-Scott" <sec...@nospam.com> wrote:
> In fact SQL is deliberately intended to be independent of its
> environment, for the environment to have no effect on it and it to have no
> effect on its environment.. 
SQL is the coda or semantics that conveys the idea of a master/slave database relationship or dictionary key:value pairs in Python. By saying SQL, signal sender and signal receiver understand a set of algorithms that achieves key:value iteration or database mapping. That's the concept , saying that "..SQL is intended to be independent of its condition of existence...." is just as meaningless as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorless_green_ideas_sleep_furiously and "...SQL is adapted to its condition of existence..." Your sentence is grammatically correct though. 
SQL as isn't separate, independent or adapted to anything. You can't be adapted or independent from your condition of existence because your "existence" is who you are. Cheese isn't "adapted" to being cheese, cheese condition of existence or environment is defined by its attributes (soft, tasty , yellow etc.) 
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/appdev.101/b10807/13_elems011.htm
"...A cursor variable declared in a PL/SQL host environment and passed to PL/SQL as a bind variable. The datatype of the host cursor variable is compatible with the return type of any PL/SQL cursor variable. Host variables must be prefixed with a colon......"
Explain how saying "....SQL is either adapted, independent,separate , linked or in love with its condition of existence......" relates to the Pragmatics of the above SQL tutorial. ? 
= kjhk =
=== sdf ===
=== asdf ===
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/DownloadDoc.aspx?doc_id=19966760
Cambridge University press
"....Viewing evolution as change in gene frequency can produce reasonable results
in terms of producing an FF&F(Fit of form and function (FF&F). For example, consider the case where
the fitness conferred by a gene on an individual is density independent
(independent of the population size) and frequency independent (independent
of gene frequencies).
In this case, the gene dynamics favor the genes that
confer the highest per capita rate of growth on the population. In the situation
where the fitness conferred by a gene is density dependent and frequency independent,
then gene dynamics favors genes that maximize the population’s
size. In both of these cases the gene dynamics favors survival of the fittest if
fitness is defined either as population growth rate or population size. However,
as soon as evolution is frequency dependent, that is the fitness conferred by
a gene on an individual is influenced by the frequencies of other genes in the
population, then the linkage between the consequence of natural selection operating
on genes and some corresponding measure of fitness at the population
level disappears. The endpoint of the gene dynamics no longer optimizes any
obvious measure of ecological success...."
"....In both of these cases the gene dynamics favors survival of the fittest if 
fitness is defined either as population growth rate or population size...."
Which is meaningless, lets rephrase: 
"....In both of these cases the gene as a cybernetic algorithmic processing abstraction favors survival of the fittest if 
fitness is defined either as population growth rate or population size...."
Suitability(what Darwin meant with fitness) isn't defined as growth rates of anything, it is context dependent subjective contrast between two or multiple states, that can't be measured on a scale like magnetic flux is measured in Gauss units. If magnetic flux is measured in Gauss would suitability then be measured in "naturals"? 
"....the fitness conferred by a gene on an individual is density independent and frequency independent...."
replace fitness with "suitability" 
"....the suitability conferred by a gene on an individual is ... frequency independent...."
replace fitness with "color"
"....the color conferred by a gene on an individual is ... frequency independent...."
Your skin color back in the 1800s on a scale of "suitability" would obviously be white in a white dominated world where white people decided who becomes slaves and who not. 
"....In both of these cases the gene dynamics favors survival of the fittest if 
fitness is defined either as population growth rate or population size...."
replace fitness with "white" and rephrase: 
"....In both of these cases the gene dynamics favors survival of the whitest if 
fitness is defined either as population growth rate or population size...."
Category:Democritus