Report 723

Report #723
Skillset: Crow Skill: Eyepeck
 Org: Ebonguard Status: Completed Dec 2011
Furies' Decision:
We will investigate implementing this report.
Problem: Crow users harvest eyes from others to use for various effects.
However, there is no way to easily determine which eye is from whom (without
going through one-by-one probing).
[A: 0 R: 0] Solution #1: Add an ability to the Eyepeck skill that allows the
 user to generate a list of all held eyeballs
 including: 1) item #, 2) Who the eye came from, and
 3) Decay time left on the eye. End the list with the
 total number of eyes held.
Player Comments:
---[Enyalida on 12/13 @ 03:26 writes]:
Sure, sounds useful.
---[Ushaara on 12/13 @ 22:01 writes]:
No issues at all with this addition.
---[Janalon on 12/14 @ 01:46 writes]:
Not sure that I completely understand the need to identify eyeball with the
eyeless victim. Though, I outright support any problem/solution that eases the
burden of syntax. Adding an ITEMLIST style command specific to Crow is definetly
warranted, though might be interesting to have Discernment ITEMLIST BODYPART to
give the same info for eyeballs, ears, etc accessible to all. I know monk
Stealth users might appreciate knowing decay times on decapitated heads!
---[Sidd on 12/14 @ 21:13 writes]:
You can use the eye to track a persons movement in your nest, so knowing whose
eye it is makes it easier to drop in your nest to track
---[Shuyin on 12/16 @ 20:28 writes]:
Sounds good
---[Janalon on 12/18 @ 14:41 writes]:
Would there be any opposition to having Discernment Itemlist handle this
solution over a Crow-specific skill?
---[Xenthos on 12/19 @ 19:47 writes]:
Don't see a need for it to be an Itemlist for body parts. Eyes only matter to
Crow users, arms / legs / ears / scalps / etc. matter to nobody, and heads only
matter to stealth people. If heads are wanted in a list it would make more
sense for it to be Stealth related IMO.
---[Viynain on 12/20 @ 20:35 writes]:
Would be useful to keep track of eyes, definitely.
---[Wobou on 12/22 @ 04:49 writes]:
Sounds good to me