Derivability

== Aphors ==
1.     I prepared to visualise the
dimensions of the object that a word represented.  I did this by writing the words on the
pedagogy screen.  First, I set up the
pedagogy screen.  Second, I wrote down
the words on it.  Third, I drew the
object on the screen.  In this way, I
prepared to visualise the dimensions of the object that a word represented by
writing the words on the pedagogy screen.
2.    I prepared to disseminate
implication.  I did this by describing
the logical operator ^i (and-implication). 
First, I stated that And-Implication meant that A implies B is true when
A is true.  Second, I stated that
And-Implication meant that A implies B is true when B is also true.  Third, I stated that And-Implication meant
that A implies B is true when A^B
is also true.  In this way, I prepared to disseminate
implication by describing the logical operator ^i (and-implication).
3.     I prepared to analyse conjunction.  I did this by describing the logical operator
^ (and). 
First, I stated that And meant that A^B is true when A is true.  Second, I stated that And meant that A^B is true when B is also true.  Third, I stated that And meant that A^B is also true when “I am thirsty” and
“The tea is available”
is true.  In this way, I prepared to analyse
conjunction by describing the logical operator ^ (and).
4.    I prepared to examine
disjunction.  I did this by describing
the logical operator v (or).  First,
I stated that Or meant that AvB may be true when A is true.  Second, I stated that Or meant that A^B may be true when B is true.  Third, I stated that Or meant that AvB is true when “I
walked left”
or “I walked right”
is true.  In this way, I prepared to examine
disjunction by describing the logical operator v (or).
5.    I prepared to look at negation closely.  I did this by describing the logical operator
¬ (not). 
First, I stated that Not meant that ¬A is true when A is false.  Second, I stated that Not meant that ¬A is false when A is true.  Third, I stated that Not meant that ¬A is true when “I am
not a merchant”
is true.  In this way, I prepared to look at negation closely
by describing the logical operator ¬
(not).
6.    I prepared to consider whether
negated conjunction was correct.  I did
this by describing the logical operator ¬^ (not and). 
First, I stated that Not-And meant that (¬A)^B
is true when A is false.  Second, I
stated that Not-And meant that (¬A)^B is true when B is also true.  Third, I stated that Not-And meant that (¬A)^B
is also true when “I am not quenched” and
“The tea is available”
is true.  In this way, I prepared to consider whether
negated conjunction was correct by describing the logical operator ¬^ (not and).
7.    I prepared to test negated
disjunction.  I did this by describing
the logical operator ¬v (not or). 
First, I stated that Not-Or meant that (¬A)vB may be true when A is false.  Second, I stated that Not-Or meant that (¬A)vB may be true when B is true.  Third, I stated that Not-Or meant that (¬A)vB is true when “I didn’t walk right” or “I walked
right”
is true.  In this way, I prepared to test negated
disjunction by describing the logical operator ¬v (not or). 
8.    I prepared to determine a chessboard
state where two pieces could have moved, as one in which the piece had moved to
the further rank.  I did this by
interpolating the chessboard state between two different chessboard states.  First, I listed the moved pieces.  Second, I wrote the chessboard state in which
the piece had moved before the second piece had moved.  Third, otherwise, I wrote the two possible
chessboard states in which either piece could have moved.  In this way, I prepared to determine a
chessboard state where two pieces could have moved, as one in which the piece
had moved to the further rank by interpolating the chessboard state between two
different chessboard states.
9.     I prepared to write that there were
more 100% grades than 50% grades.  I did
this by drawing the probability curve for grades.  First, I drew a low middle of the curve.  Second, I drew a high right of the
curve.  Third, I labelled the high right
of the curve “100%”.
  In this way, I prepared to write that there were more 100% grades
than 50% grades by drawing the probability curve for grades.
10.   I prepared to align a line with the
most likely road route.  I did this by
determining the route that the driver had driven from A to B.  First, I drew the first point on the map.  Second, I drew the second point on the
map.  Third, I ruled the route between
them.  In this way, I prepared to align a
line with the most likely road route by determining the route that the driver
had driven from A to B.
11.    I prepared to test that the giraffe
had a long enough neck.  I did this by testing
the assignment with students.  First, I tested
the hypotenuse.  Second, I tested the
giraffe.  Third, I tested the hiraffe
(sic).  In this way, I prepared to test
that the giraffe had a long enough neck by testing the assignment with
students.
12.   I prepared to collect the floated
comments.  I did this by checking off the
floated comment in the online project management software.  First, I   found
the comments.  Second, I found the
floated comment.  Third, I checked it
off.  In this way, I prepared to collect
the floated comments by checking off the floated comment in the online project
management software.
13.    I prepared to satisfy a key
performance indicator.  I did this by proofreading
the document by breasoning it out. 
First, I gave the clause a 10 (in fact, 80) breasoning-long A.  Second, I checked the number of objects
matched the number of the verb.  Third, I
checked the language matched flow of objects through objects.  In this way, I prepared to satisfy a key
performance indicator by proofreading the document by breasoning it out.
14.   I prepared to taste-test the meal.  I did this by tasting the raspberry aggregate
part.  First, I picked the raspberry.  Second, I picked its aggregate part.  Third, I tasted the aggregate part.  In this way, I prepared to taste-test the
meal by tasting the raspberry aggregate part.
15.   I prepared to construct a chemical
molecule recognition machine.  I did this
by writing the name of the object on the pedagogy screen.  First, I looked at the pedagogy screen.  Second, I recognised the object on the
screen.  Third, I wrote its name.  In this way, I prepared to construct a
chemical molecule recognition machine by writing the name of the object on the
pedagogy screen.
16.   I prepared to write how the main
property of an object relates to space and value.  I did this by philosophically describing an
object in a sentence.  First, I wrote
down the structure of the object. 
Second, I wrote how the object related to me.  Third, I wrote the main property of how it
related to me.  In this way, I prepared
to write how the main property of an object relates to space and value by
philosophically describing an object in a sentence.
17.   The department prepared to be itself.  The department did this by applying perspectivism
to itself.  First, it applied Politics to
itself.  Second, it applied Economics to
itself.  Third, it applied History to
itself.  In this way, the department prepared
to be itself by applying perspectivism to itself.
18.   I prepared to value the object.  The subject did this by deeming herself
positive when the object was determined to be objectively positive.  First, I determined that the object worked.  Second, I determined that the object was
mechanically functional.  Third, I
determined that the object worked.  In this
way, I prepared to value the object by deeming herself positive when the object
was determined to be objectively positive.
19.    I prepared to determine that the
object was algorithmically bug-free.  I
did this by deeming the object objectively positive.  First, I recollected the object.  Second, I wrote that I had no bias in judging
the object.  Third, I determined that the
object, an apple was fresh.  In this way,
I prepared to determine that the object was algorithmically bug-free by deeming
the object objectively positive.
20.  I prepared to predict the output
from the input.  I did this by stating
that the self’s event was only caused by the other’s event, in fact, as in the input, not the
output, as in Simulated Intelligence. 
First, I found the variable with the plus sign (“+”) before it in the documentation, indicating it
was an input variable, where the variable was in the head of the called
predicate.  Second, I found the data item
corresponding to it in the query.  Third,
I wrote this data item down.  In this
way, I prepared to predict the output from the input by stating that the self’s event was only caused by the other’s event, in fact, as in the input, not the
output, as in Simulated Intelligence.
21.   I prepared to report the crime.  I did this by identifying the murder (in
fact, drinking tea).  First, I identified
that no one knew when the murder would occur. 
Second, I identified when it would happen.  Third, I identified that it happened.  In this way, I prepared to report the crime
by identifying the murder (in fact, drinking tea).
22.   I prepared to program a robot mind.  I did this by writing 10 80-breasoning
subjects to be with-it in a Conglish (Computational English) degree.  First, I wrote the robot subjects.  Second, I wrote the mind subjects.  Third, I wrote the robot mind subjects.  In this way, I prepared to program a robot
mind by writing 10 80-breasoning subjects to be with-it in a Conglish
(Computational English) degree.
23.   I prepared to be perfectly
healthy.  I did this by writing 10 80-breasoning
subjects to be with-it in a Medicine degree. 
First, I wrote the organ subjects. 
Second, I wrote the theological surgery subjects.  Third, I wrote the organ sutra subjects.  In this way, I prepared to be perfectly
healthy by writing 10 80-breasoning subjects to be with-it in a Medicine
degree.
24.   I prepared to be a Pedagogue.  I did this by writing 10 80-breasoning
subjects to be with-it in a Pedagogy degree. 
First, I wrote the philosophy subjects. 
Second, I wrote the writing subjects. 
Third, I wrote the job requirements subjects.  In this way, I prepared to be a Pedagogue by
writing 10 80-breasoning subjects to be with-it in a Pedagogy degree.
25.  I prepared to be a meditator.  I did this by writing 10 80-breasoning
subjects to be with-it in a Meditation degree. 
First, I wrote the philosophy subjects. 
Second, I wrote the 50 breasonings per utterance subject.  Third, I wrote the job requirements
subjects.  In this way, I prepared to be
a meditator by writing 10 80-breasoning subjects to be with-it in a Meditation
degree.
26.   I prepared to be a critic (in fact,
a positive commentator).  I did this by buying
the banana at the bargain basement. 
First, I walked down the stairs to the bargain basement.  Second, I ordered the banana.  Third, I paid for the banana.  In this way, I prepared to be a critic (in
fact, a positive commentator) by buying the banana at the bargain basement.
27.   I prepared to make sure the country
was safe.  I did this by observing the
law beckon the subject, like observing a person smell a pink flower.  First, I observed the left-wing lawyers
arrive at the office.  Second, I observed
them select a subject.  Third, I observed
them write the subject.  In this way, I
prepared to make sure the country was safe by observing the law beckon the
subject, like observing a person smell a pink flower.
28.   I prepared to find the centre of a
cross.  I did this by crossing over the
knitting needles.  First, I placed the
first knitting needle pointing to me on the table.  Second, I found the middle of the knitting
needle and another knitting needle. 
Third, I made a cross by placing the second knitting needle on the first
knitting needle on the table.  In this
way, I prepared to find the centre of a cross by crossing over the knitting
needles.
29.   I prepared to determine that
hydrogen had been produced by the reaction. 
I did this by conducting the hydrogen pop test.  First, I added magnesium to diluted acid in a
test tube in a rack, followed by placing my finger over the end of the test
tube.  Second, I observed bubbles of
hydrogen rise from the magnesium, followed by releasing the pressure from the
test tube while bringing a lit match to the end of the test tube.  Third, I listened to the “pop”
sound.  In this way, I prepared to
determine that hydrogen had been produced by the reaction by conducting the
hydrogen pop test.
30.   I prepared to make enough up.  I did this by closing the gate.  First, I wrote the first course.  Second, I prepared to write the next
course.  Third, I repeated this until I
had written all the courses.  In this
way, I prepared to make enough up by closing the gate.
31.    I prepared to transform vegetarians.  I did this by eating the vegan nuggets.  First, I served the vegetarian rice paper
roll.  Second, I walked to the next
table.  Third, I ate the vegan
nuggets.  In this way, I prepared to
transform vegetarians by eating the vegan nuggets.
32.   I prepared to dining with the vegan’s friends.  I did
this by eating with the vegan.  First, I
chose the restaurant.  Second, I chose
the vegan.  Third, I dined with the
vegan.  In this way, I prepared to dining
with the vegan’s friends by eating with the vegan.