Report 756

Report #756
Skillset: Elementalism Skill: Cleanse
 Org: Shofangi Status: Completed Jan 2012
Furies' Decision:
We will allow CAST CLEANSE ME to be cast while blind at a lower equilibrium
recovery. We decline to change anything else.
Problem: Currently there are significant differences between 'cast cleanse me'
and 'rub cleanse', and despite the fact that the cleanse enchantment is
available to everyone and sourced from the elementalism skill, all of these
changes favor the enchantment. Blindness stops 'cast cleanse me' (due to the
'me' part I'm guessing) but does not stop rub cleanse. Similarly broken arms
will stop cast cleanse but not rub. I think it is a bit silly that the source
skill would be worse than the enchantment available to everyone and feel that
the effects should be standardized.
[A: 0 R: 0] Solution #1: Allow both cast and rub cleanse while blind and with
 broken arms
[A: 0 R: 0] Solution #2: Allow both cast and rub cleanse while blind but
 require at least one free arm to rub or cast
Player Comments:
---[Draylor on 1/4 @ 15:28 writes]:
No problem with this at all
---[Ushaara on 1/4 @ 16:59 writes]:
I think Solution #1 would be the most equitable fix, though with #2 raising the
possibility of a softer 'greenlock' which still allows movement, it is an
interesting idea to consider.
---[Iytha on 1/5 @ 01:49 writes]:
This really seems like a bug.
---[Shedrin on 1/6 @ 03:26 writes]:
Solution 1.
---[Sidd on 1/6 @ 05:04 writes]:
For pure druidic selfishness, solution 2 seems the way to go, but I can deal
with solution 1
---[Rivius on 1/7 @ 05:49 writes]:
Solution 1 preferred.
---[Akui on 1/7 @ 16:31 writes]:
Solution 1 would make the fewest waves and resolve the issue. I prefer that.
---[Wobou on 1/9 @ 03:36 writes]:
When I first wrote solution 2 I was (selfishly) thinking of my self and I didn't
think that it would be any easier to do than a traditional greenlock, however
some other guilds would have a much easier time with it (nekotai comes to mind)
so I don't think it should really be considered. I'll leave it up for discussion
sake though.
---[Shuyin on 1/11 @ 20:24 writes]:
Solution 1 is fine
---[Talan on 1/15 @ 04:56 writes]:
Solution 1