McCormick v. Parkland

McCormick v. Parkland was a landmark decision of the R.R. Supreme Court in which the court ruled that the Robloxian Republic Constitution does not protect Sections I and II of the Rights Reserved to the States Act. Section I would completely block the federal government from handling elections and allow the states and their governments to handle them instead. Section II would completely block the federal government from collecting taxes and making tax bills. The decision nullified bills awaiting votes in state Assemblies that would amend tax or voting policies and fueled an ongoing debate about abortion.
The case was filed by Vice Minister Amanda McCormick after the House voted to pass Alex Parkland's "Rights Reserved to the States Act". She filed the case against Alex Parkland challenging the constitutionality of the bill.
On January 30, 2022, in a 5-1 ruling, the court ruled that the states had no right to amend voting as it was written in the Constitution that the FEC, a federal agency, would handle elections, nothing else. Justice Henry Jackson was the only dissenter.
On January 30, 2022, in a 4-2 ruling, the court ruled that the states had no constitutional right to amend tax policies or collect taxes in any way, shape or form. Justices Jackson and Giulani dissented.
On January 30, 2022, in a 4-2 ruling, the court ruled that the states did have a right to regulate abortion as abortion has no absolute right in the Constitution, JUstices Pison and Gonovan dissented. The decision effectively overturned the Smart v. Banks ruling in 2013 and Casey v. Kimura ruling in 2017.