AcloselookAtNaturalSelection

Category:TauTology 
TableOfContents
=== adsf ===
http://omgili.com/newsgroups/talk/origins/ed9efa5c-af88-4ecb-a157-1ce1a54c974cp15g2000vblgooglegroupscom.html
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:19:21 -0700 (PDT), All-seeing-I <...@email.com
On Oct 29, 8:34 am, John Harshman <...@pacbell.net
First, No one said anything about who was "physically" the strongest. But it should be common knowledge that the younger and stronger of the species has a better chance of passing their genes on. For evolution to work, it needs all the hope and chances there are. Crossing one's fingers helps too. The younger and stronger is the best chance for evolution to carry those susposed slight changes foward which in turn allows a better chance for species survival.
=== asdf ===
ItsNotDarwinWallaceTheory
A closer look by poster ZOE with replies by wilkins
http://groups.google.co.za/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/a5bda8eed0c6fa0?hl=en&tvc=1&q=%22natural+selection%22
http://groups.google.co.za/group/talk.origins/tree/browse_frm/thread/0a5bda8eed0c6fa0/cc9242cd7b2e3165?hl=en&rnum=1&q=%22natural+selection%22&_done=%2Fgroup%2Ftalk.origins%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fa5bda8eed0c6fa0%3Fhl%3Den%26tvc%3D1%26q%3D%2522natural%2Bselection%2522%26#doc_c6a3cb5660212cfb
=== post 7 by John Harshman ===
http://groups.google.co.za/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/a5bda8eed0c6fa0?hl=en&tvc=1&q=%22natural+selection%22&pli=1
First, selection doesn't filter populations. It filters individuals
within populations. Populations (or their aggregate genetic makeups) are
the results of this filtering, not the objects. It's open to debate
whether it's better to consider the objects of the filter to be alleles, genotypes, or individuals.
"....I could make a case for all three. Individuals are the entities that reproduce and are directly subject to selection, i.e. differential reproduction ....." - TRUTHINESS TAUTOLOGY
"...But the ones that successfully reproduced best are those with the advantageous traits....." ,"...And that's natural selection. ..."
=== 15 ===
No, that doesn't follow logically. You seem to believe in general that properties of wholes must be properties of parts and vice versa. That's
simply not true. Individuals are selected, and the result is that allele frequencies change within populations. The former is selection, the
latter is evolution. 
=== 6 Frank Reichenbacher Jun 15 2004 ===
"...The choice of date, as far as you are concerned was completely random, but you still had a choice. ...
NO it wasnt' because the outcome was predetermined , you knew you would get a date. the agency made a selction at random
=== rnorman ===
http://groups.google.co.za/group/talk.origins/tree/browse_frm/thread/0a5bda8eed0c6fa0/cc9242cd7b2e3165?hl=en&rnum=1&q=%22natural+selection%22&_done=%2Fgroup%2Ftalk.origins%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fa5bda8eed0c6fa0%3Fhl%3Den%26tvc%3D1%26q%3D%2522natural%2Bselection%2522%26pli%3D1%26#doc_382195837d8eaf89
".....Still the notion of selection as a filter seems useful. ..."
=== rnorman ===
http://groups.google.co.za/group/talk.origins/tree/browse_frm/thread/0a5bda8eed0c6fa0/cc9242cd7b2e3165?hl=en&rnum=1&q=%22natural+selection%22&_done=%2Fgroup%2Ftalk.origins%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fa5bda8eed0c6fa0%3Fhl%3Den%26tvc%3D1%26q%3D%2522natural%2Bselection%2522%26pli%3D1%26#doc_72fca349202e46a3
Category:TauTology