Board Thread:Community Discusson/@comment-5175866-20160327030142/@comment-5175866-20160402202433

@Achild- I thought you were siding for the latter. I didn't quite get the point of giving an article format idea if the entire article isn't a biography. 
@SouthWriter- that can be agreeable, but the two things that need to be decided on are "Legacy" and "Characteristics". I am going to update the original message to make the focus on Legacy and Characteristics.
My opinion still stands that Legacy should be separate from biography. While death and legacy play in "Death" and "Legacy" are separate. The Death subheading should be one word unless you use a conjunction and then say the type of death (for example Death and Crucifixion, Death and Suicide. As stated earlier "Death" is about the things that lead to their death and how they died. This may include some biblical detail on the process of their death, for example how Judas's intestines spilled on the ground. The "Legacy" discusses there impact and any biblical detail concerning them after their death. The tricky thing to deal with here is if the mourning of someone and burial would be included under Legacy or Death? I would say that information, that immediately follows their death would go under Death.
As for characteristics, I still think there would need to a separate heading. If we included all such details in the intro, there would be cases where the intro would have to be much more detailed rather than that info being in its own heading. I would suggest to call the heading "Personality"
With regards to "Etymology" wouldn't it be useful to rename to "Name" (this applies to most articles). We need some clearer more "sided" feedback in order to make a decision