Hunters ranking of OSM startups

Note: If anyone without the name WE.DMAN.WAS.LOST adds a ranking or edits a ranking, then it will be reverted. If someone with WE.DMAN in their name edits this and WE.DMAN.WAS.LOST doesnt say their fake then they are the new account of WE.DMAN.WAS.LOST. This is also built on personal beliefs, 
Also, please add some startups and shutdowns for me to rate! However do not add your own ranking.
But first. Some ground rules:
== Ground Rules ==
I will rate the startup (and shutdown screens) of these OS's on a 0-10 ratio. The rating will be based on: How Readable it is, The logo's appeal, and the colors. Neon colors are usually a instant low ranking. Too much clutter on a boot screen is also a instant low ranking. Simplicity will give a high ranking at most times, If applicable, the time will be taken account of too. Example: Most OSes past 2019 cannot look like windows 2000. and absolutely no looking like windows 1.0. Realism can also be taken into account, Example: An OS shouldnt exist in the 1950s.
Although even though these rules still exist, i may not remember them. But thats alright as they are still genuine.
== WNR Bootscreens ==
Okay uhmm, What even is this? First of all, The color palette is inconsistent, The windows text is in black which makes it hard to read, and the "freed from Desire" text isnt even in the right font. And why is there that image behind there? Solid 3/10. Its visually appealing but its 1996.
This isnt much better, The image seems to be stretched...? and the blue windows logo doesnt fit in. This time it has a slightly better font, 4/10. Also, i ask again. WHAT IS THIS OS??? I would go on a rant to fill up space, But really i dont have a idea what to say.
Everything is good besides the V. Its in the wrong font and its way too dark. everything else is nice. Its kinda hard to say, So i guess ill just give it a 6/10? Maybe a 6.5/10 but im not really sure. It mightve got a 8.5/10 or 9/10 if that Ungodly V was fixed.
== NROS Bootscreens ==
== Other/Unknown Category Bootscreens ==
Decent 9/10. Although the microsoft logo could be smaller or outright removed, and some adjustments could be made. This is still very good and appealing for 1990. Its a nice bootscreen overall. The alt version is a 7/10, it just has worse colors.
Id say a 7/10. Everything is good for the time period, Besides the fact that WHY IS IT THAT LOW!?!?. Also the 6 could definitely be adjusted, It isnt correctly alligned with Windows. Also it says microsoft twice??