Science - Blue Stars Are Evidence of a Young Universe

== Introduction ==
This isn't a Bible article in that I will quote no scripture and I do not work from the premise that the Bible is true or that God exists. The purpose of this article and indeed articles in this section are to reason from evidence to God. To that end, I will only be using Physics and perhaps a bit of Chemistry and Biology to argue the main premise.
Premise: The Universe is relatively young compared to evolutionary assertions of billions of years.
In this article, I intend only to show that the universe cannot be more than a few million years old. This does not mean that I believe the universe is a few million years old, only that this is the upper limit based on Physics alone. Other evidence in conjunction with this will bring that number down.
== New Stars Never Form ==
The first piece of evidence to support the premise is the fact that new stars never form. This isn't just a bold assertion and yes, it's in spite of the claim of many in the fields of astronomy, astrophysics, and beyond that they see new stars forming all the time. Here are some observable facts:
# Even those who argue for new star formation acknowledge that this process takes millions of years (see this article from Cal Tech). No one lives long enough to observe this process in any meaningful measure.
# Nebula, the alleged birthplace for stars are very sparse. Though we can see them as a cloud from afar, if you were in one, you wouldn't know it. The air density at sea level on Earth is 19 quintillion molecules per cubic centimeter. The density of a nebula is anywhere from 1 million molecules down to 10 molecules per cubic centimeter. It's such a perfect vacuum, we can't replicate that sparsity with current technology. (University of Illinois, James Taylor - Prof. Emeritus of Astronomy)
# Gasses expand. Take any gas and put into an environment where it has low pressure and it will expand to fill the available space. This is due to available kinetic energy, but also due to electromagnetic repulsion of the gas molecules. Space is a really big container to fill. So the gasses from an exploding star that form a nebula, already moving outward at a high rate because of the explosion, will continue to expand into sparser and sparser regions of space. Add to this, that most hydogen atoms are ions at this point and so repel one another through electromagnetic force even more strongly than normal gas molecules.
# Electromagnetic force is stronger than Gravity. The gravitational constant (G) is 6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2. In contrast, the electromagnetic force constant (k) is 9.00x10^9 Nm^2/C^2. That's a difference in magnitude of 135 quintillion. So, for gasses in a nebula to contract due to gravity and form a star over millions of years, that gravity has to overcome an expansion force that is equal to 135 followed by 18 zeroes times greater than it. Even the astrophysicist acknowledge this problem and have asserted other possible methods for nebular contraction into stars, but they have no observable evidence or consistent models to support these assertions. They only have the assumption that the universe is really old so it must happen somehow. That's not science.
# Increasing Pressure Increases Temperature. According to the Ideal Gas Law (PV = nrT) as pressure increases, so does temperature. This is problematic for star formation because temperature is just the measure of average kinetic energy of a system. In other words, as the star allegedly collapses, it increases in pressure and therefore temperature (necessary for star ignition) which increases the gas's energy of motion, which causes the molecules to speed up and try to expand even more than before!
# Putting all this together, the obvious conclusion from the observable reality is that new stars can't form. There isn't a natural mechanism within the universe for this to happen.
== Blue Stars Burn Fast ==
Blue stars are among the hottest stars in the universe. They have lifespans limited to only a few million years at best. Despite having more fuel than our sun, because of the rate of fuel consumption, they live only 1/1000th the time. In a universe that is supposed to be 13.7billion years (at least that's the latest official number, though it keeps going up), that's a huge problem. Why are there any blue stars left in the universe at all?
== Conclusion ==
Given that blue stars just don't live very long in the grand scheme and having shown that new stars can't possibly form, there is a conclusion that must be drawn. If blue stars are still around and no new stars ever form, these blue stars must have formed at the beginning of the universe. If blue stars are the shortest-lived of all stars then their life span determines the maximum age of the universe. If their lifespan is demonstrably only a few million years old, then the universe cannot possibly be billions of years old. 
The universe is therefore relatively young compared to evolutionary assertions.
To my knowledge, there is no counterargument proffered to this.
In Truth and Love.