Philosophical Computational English

== Aphors ==
1.     I prepared to use the knowledge from
my master’s lineage of masters.  I did this by worshipping God (in fact,
thanking my master).  First, I walked to
my master.  Second, I greeted him.  Third, I thanked him.  In this way, I prepared to use the knowledge
from my master’s lineage of masters by worshipping
God (in fact, thanking my master).
2.    I prepared to support my students.  I did this by praying for (in fact, writing)
a 10 (in fact, an 80) breasoning A each day for my students.  First, I wrote the topic of the first student’s first thought.  Second, I wrote the first breasoning on the
topic.  Third, I wrote the rest of the
breasonings on the topic.  In this way, I
prepared to support my students by praying for (in fact, writing) a 10 (in
fact, an 80) breasoning A each day for my students.
3.     I prepared to lead the person.  I did this by hugging the thinking head.  First, I asked the lady whether I could touch
her head.  Second, I placed my left hand
on one side on her head.  Third, I placed
my right hand on the other side of her head. 
In this way, I prepared to lead the person by hugging the thinking head.
4.    I prepared to write a philosophical
argument.  I did this by writing the
philosophy.  First, I wrote the influence
of the philosophy.  Second, I wrote the
aim of the philosophy.  Third, I wrote
the philosophy.  In this way, .
5.    I prepared to analyse an English
narrative in a journalism article.  I did
this by writing an A.  First, I wrote an
English narrative.  Second, I programmed
a computational algorithm in the narrative. 
Third, I wrote the philosophy about the algorithm.  In this way, I prepared to analyse an English
narrative in a journalism article by writing an A.  First, I wrote an English narrative.
6.    I prepared to present the cake.  I did this by placing the candles on the
cake.  First, I read the person’s age. 
Second, I placed the first candle on the cake.  Third, I placed the rest of the required
number of candles on the cake.  In this
way, I prepared to present the cake by placing the candles on the cake.
7.    I prepared to eat the vegan
cake.  I did this by presenting the
cake.  First, I turned off the
lights.  Second, I presented the
cake.  Third, I told the birthday boy to
blow out the candles.  In this way, I
prepared to eat the vegan cake by presenting the cake.
8.    I prepared to program a robot
mind.  I did this by writing an Ontology Web
Database.  First, I wrote the objects’ registration numbers.  Second, I recorded the ontology (data
structure) of the objects.  Third, I
recorded the ontology’s position in the universal ideology
(ontology).  In this way, I prepared to
program a robot mind by writing an Ontology Web Database.
9.     I prepared to program a computer mind
network.  I did this by writing an
Ontology Web Database Game for people. 
First, I placed a binary ontology on my local starting position on my
turn.  Second, I placed the next binary
ontology connecting with the end point of a sequence of ontologies in my
ideology (hierarchy) on my next turn. 
Third, I won the game when I was first in the group to have the longest
sequence of ontologies that numbered five in my ideology.  In this way, I prepared to program a computer
mind network by writing an Ontology Web Database Game for people.
10.   The self prepared to intertextualise
the other.  The self did this by
connecting a text with the other’s
text.  First, the self jazzed it.  Second, the self winkled it.  Third, the self helped it.  In this way, the self intertextualised the
other.  The self did this by connecting a
text with the other’s text.  In this way, the self prepared to
intertextualise the other by connecting a text with the other’s text.
11.    I prepared to wrote new
philosophical algorithms in academia.  I
did this by stating that the self should connect a sentence's part with the
other’s other part of that sentence.  First, I wrote the start, middle and end of
the sentence in the row headings.  Second,
I wrote the start, middle and end of the sentence in the column headings.  Third, I connected each combination of pairs
of sentence parts.  In this way, I
prepared to wrote new philosophical algorithms in academia by stating that the
self should connect a sentence's part with the other’s other part of that sentence.
12.   I prepared to determine the
philosophical complexity (longest chain, including expanded recursion) of the
algorithm.  I did this by stating that
the self should expand his or her idea into the other's idea algorithm.  First, I thought of the overall function of
the algorithm.  Second, I thought of the
individual predicates of the algorithm. 
Third, I simplified each predicate into two parts going well
together.  In this way, I prepared to determine
the philosophical complexity (longest chain, including expanded recursion) of
the algorithm by stating that the self should expand his or her idea into the
other's idea algorithm.
13.    I prepared to place a map of the
shop in the map of the city.  I did this
by stating that the self should write an ontology that scales the complexity of
algorithm from simple to as complex as the other requires, e.g. by making data
structures more detailed.  First, I drew
a square.  Second, I divided it into
quarters.  Third, I divided each quarter
into quarters.  In this way, I prepared
to place a map of the shop in the map of the city by stating that the self
should write an ontology that scales the complexity of algorithm from simple to
as complex as the other requires, e.g. by making data structures more detailed.
14.  
I
prepared to verify that the algorithms had the same qualities.  I did this by stating that the self should
find similarities of ontologies in the other's five algorithms.  First, I observed that the ontologies of the
five algorithms had the same branching point.  Second, I observed that the ontologies of the
five algorithms had the same length. 
Third, I observed that the ontologies of the five algorithms had the
same number of items in total.  In this
way, I prepared to verify that the algorithms had the same qualities by stating
that the self should find similarities of ontologies in the other's five
algorithms.
15.   I prepared to connect differences in
ontologies of different algorithms of the other.  I did this by affirming that the self should
find differences in ontologies of different algorithms of the other.  First, I observed that the ontologies of the
different algorithms had a different number of levels.  Second, I observed that the ontologies of the
different algorithms had a different number of items per level.  Third, I observed that the ontologies of the
different algorithms had a different item type at the same position.  In this way, I prepared to connect
differences in ontologies of different algorithms of the other by affirming
that the self should find differences in ontologies of different algorithms of
the other.
16.   I prepared to compress algorithmic
complexity.  I did this by stating that the
self should write ontologies of the other's algorithms’ parts. 
First, I wrote the structure of the algorithm’s parts (functions, or Prolog predicates).  Second, I wrote the order of the groups of
commands in each predicate.  Third, I
wrote the command types in each predicate (call, recursive or mathematical).  In this way, I prepared to compress
algorithmic complexity by stating that the self should write ontologies of the
other's algorithms’ parts.
17.   I prepared to examine the meaning of
the ontologies of the data structures.  I
did this by writing that the self should write ontologies of the other’s algorithms’ data structures.  First, I wrote in the ontology that the algorithm’s data structure was a point.  Second, I wrote in the ontology that the algorithm’s data structure was a line.  Third, I wrote in the ontology that the algorithm’s data structure was a tree.  In this way, I prepared to examine the
meaning of the data structures’ structures by writing that the self
should write ontologies of the other’s
algorithms’ data structures.
18.   I prepared to read the book.  I did this by turning to the right page.  First, I opened the book.  Second, I turned the pages.  Third, I repeated this until I had I had found
the correct page.  In this way, I
prepared to read the book by turning to the right page.
19.    I prepared to read the page that
fell open.  I did this by turning to the
page that fell open.  First, I rested the
book edition on its spine.  Second, I
allowed the book edition to fall open. 
Third, I observed the page that fell open.  In this way, I prepared to read the page that
fell open by turning to the page that fell open.
20.  I prepared to read the chapter.  I did this by turning to the first page.  First, I opened the volume.  Second, I turned the title page.  Third, I turned to the first page.  In this way, I prepared to read the chapter
by turning to the first page.
21.   I prepared to write quickly and
clearly.  I did this by stating that I
was mentally fit to write many As. First, I consulted the doctor.  Second, he gave me a certificate.  Third, I wrote many As.  In this way, I prepared to write quickly and
clearly by stating that I was mentally fit to write many As.
22.   I prepared to form the movie poster.  I did this by preventing the mistake becoming
a big idea to earn an acting role. 
First, I wrote the mistake (correction). 
Second, I wrote the big idea appearance (movie poster).  Third, I prevented writing that the mistake
would be transformed into a big idea.  In
this way, I prepared to form the movie poster by preventing the mistake
becoming a big idea to earn an acting role.
23.   I prepared to teach meditation in
France.  I did this by translating
meditation into other languages, for example French.  First, I looked up the word in the first
language.  Second, I found the word in
the second language.  Third, I wrote down
the word in the second language.  In this
way, I prepared to teach meditation in France by translating meditation into
other languages, for example French.
24.   I prepared to teach pedagogy in Italy.  I did this by translating pedagogy into other
languages, for example Italian.  First, I
looked up the word in the first language. 
Second, I found the word in the second language.  Third, I wrote down the word in the second
language.  In this way, I prepared to
teach pedagogy in Italy by translating pedagogy into other languages, for
example Italian.
25.  I prepared to teach medicine in Germany.  I did this by translating medicine into other
languages, for example German.  First, I
looked up the word in the first language. 
Second, I found the word in the second language.  Third, I wrote down the word in the second
language.  In this way, I prepared to
teach medicine in Germany by translating medicine into other languages, for
example German.
26.   I prepared to teach Computational
English in Spain.  I did this by
translating Computational English into other languages, for example Spanish.  First, I looked up the word in the first
language.  Second, I found the word in
the second language.  Third, I wrote down
the word in the second language.  In this
way, I prepared to teach Computational English in Spain by translating Computational
English into other languages, for example Spanish.
27.   I prepared to paint the child’s nursery. 
I did this by thinking of meeting 50 influential people before
conceiving the baby.  First, I thought of
famous categories.  Second, I thought of
their personalities.  Third, I thought of
their thoughts.  In this way, I prepared
to paint the child’s nursery by thinking of meeting 50
influential people before conceiving the baby.
28.   I prepared to developedly (sic) rebreason
out (think of the verb that connects the subject and object) the combination of
two sentences.  I did this by
undevelopedly (sic) breasoning out two sentences that I would combine.  First, I developedly breasoned out
undeveloped breasonings.  Second,
undeveloped breasonings were developedly breasoned out.  Third, the undeveloped breasonings were
attributed to the students.  In this way,
I prepared to developedly rebreason out (think of the verb that connects the
subject and object) the combination of two sentences by undevelopedly
breasoning out two sentences that I would combine.
29.   I prepared to write a secondary text.  I did this by writing a 20-breasoning
(80-breasoning) long sequence for a sentence with original content, rather than
referenced content.  First, I looked up
breasonings for the sentence and the argument corresponding to these
breasonings.  Second, I wrote an
algorithm connecting the sentence with the pointed to developed breasoning.  Third, I wrote an algorithm connecting the
sentences together, and omitted the connection in the text.  In this way, I prepared to write a secondary
text by writing a 20-breasoning (80-breasoning) long sequence for a sentence
with original content, rather than referenced content.
30.   I prepared to list influences on the
philosophy chapter (contra by in English). 
I did this by writing 5 190 breasoning As per chapter.  First, I wrote an A as the chapter.  Second, I wrote a theologically themed
A.  Third, I wrote a politically themed
A.  In this way, I prepared to list
influences on the philosophy chapter (contra by in English) by writing 5 190
breasoning As per chapter.
31.    I prepared to meet professional requirements
for selling a book.  I did this by writing
50 As per book.  First, I breasoned out
50 As as the publisher.  Second, I wrote
50 area of study As.  Third, I breasoned
out 50 As in the six month period leading up to publication as the author.  In this way, I prepared to meet professional requirements
for selling a book by writing 50 As per book.
32.   I prepared to buy products that I
added value to.  I did this by breasoning
out 5 As per day for sales.  First, I trialled
the product.  Second, I found a new use
for the product.  Third I used the product
for thus new use.  In this way, I
prepared to buy products that I added value to by breasoning out 5 As per day
for sales.