OESDE vs RALA

-The whole of the Shifting can be boiled down into OESDE vs RALA. Each of them represents the overwhelming 'reason' behind their respective TTBs (Kreator and Theist). 
>OESDE by itself will win over RALA. Widest-Net leaves no other logical conclusion but OESDE/Kreator TTB. 
>The problem for OESDE has been letting The Darkness in. = The solution here is realizing that Theist's version of PK is jumping the gun. We know a mearest fraction of what God exists as. To take what little we know and declare broad, sweeping generalizations is the height of stupidity and a clear example of closing a case early in metaphysics. Theists PK version seems appealing tight-knit, but it falls apart when you remember First Risk and how little we know of God. 
>OESDE (Kreator) has its own, much simpler and more realisitic version of PK; recognizing that higher beings have little need for evil. (The Great Hope).
>
=== Truths-Unrevealed/Time-Machine Critique Kills RALA: ===
-The quesiton of RALA and Theistic-Supreme boils down to whether we should remain open to the idea of God introducing new truths that shift hte proper TTB away from Theist sometime in the future. Because all things are possible, this possibility exists at least in potential. God isn't finished teaching us yet!
-The answer to that question appears to be Time-Machine Critique, which shows that in the past God has allowed us to follow examples of natural theoogy (regardless of how good they might be, which is supposed to be irrelevent to PK or RALA) to positions which later needed to be changed.
-This isn't a threat to PK because we still have First Risk/Indivisability which gives us a Supreme, and the Great Hope. A Supreme and Great Hope is all that is needed to beat The Darkness, nothing else.
-Remember, PK protects from false theology, not incomplete ones. That difference is crucial!
-Theist likes to posit that any risk is too much and that STrict PK removes it, but there will alays be the First Risk.
-STrict PK is too brittle, doesn't jibe well with our grey world of many religions, and makes Theist highly vulnerable to TM-C.
-RALA tries to come off as common sense, that we should be abe to rely on God for basic answers or what's the point of PK; but remember that God is in the details, and most theoogy is the same but those few differences are often crucial!
-Ideally speaking, TM-C is the death of strict RALA.
-If anything is possible, we must be open to anything!
-
Category:Theism
Category:Anchors
Category:Anchor
Category:Infinity Theology