Fanon Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171003142429/@comment-29564364-20171109193225

@Nekron1
«@TheAlphaHD»
Again, it's "AlphaTheHD," not "TheAlphaHD."
«Please properly go through your own definitions.It clearly deems verse as FICTIONAL WORLD and fiction meaning the entire franchise. A fictional world is a part of a fiction use your common sense.»
Did you not read the part in my previous reply where I mentione the word "world" having more than one definition?
«Well,in your comment you said "both the.....with different creaters and contributers".Well,then tell me can I use different meanings of immortality on two different pages?»
Yes, but you would be using two different definitions for the same word in the same context.
However, I said "different creators and contributors." As far as I'm concerned, you are not a different person than yourself.
«If it is agreed in one wikia that the definition of immortality is the power to live forever in prime state, then I can't introduce other definitions of immortality on other pages otherwise the pages will be edited to fit the agreed definition of immortality.»
Exactly. "If it is agreed in one [wiki]" is my point. If it is clearly defined on one page or another, then there's not much to argue about other than the validity of the definition. But in this wiki, I have yet to see a single page giving a proper definition for the word Verse, and so, it is a topic up to be discussed.
Also, the comparison Verse and Immortality is a false equivalence. For one, Immortality is a power with a multitude of variations while Verse is a term used to describe an aspect of the cosmology depicted in a work of fiction to witch a single definition should be used across the wiki. Then there's the fact that Immortality has an entire page dedicated to explaining the power, a page that the term Verse lacks.
«So,the only definition agreed by the whole community is applicaple to the whole wikia and not individual choices.»
Am I not part of the community? I have an account, I contribute to pages, make blog posts, participate in discussions and have been around for over a year. Am I missing something in order to be considered part of the community?
And I think you missed the part where I said I wasn't trying to impose my definitions on the wiki.
@Nekron2
«remeber there was a marvel-dc crossover once showing that if both franchises consent then even going into other fictions is possible. During the crossover many marvel and dc charecters went to each others verse,so even your theory of a charecter not being able to leave its respective fiction has been proven wrong.»
If it was depicted in the Marvel or DC comics (whichever it was), it is therefore part of the Marvel or DC-verse. Simple as that. That only means one or both company's Verses count a representation of the other's omniverse in which the events took place.