Board Thread:Community Discusson/@comment-5175866-20140405003330

Hello to viewers of this wiki. I know we have many viewers a week, nearing one to two thousand, but I being the primary community member (with the occasional contributions from a few users) and the Administraotr I would like some opinon on further neutrality of the content at which I will explain here in a minute. Those who are not contributors here who are reading this, I encourage you contribute to the site and register for an account (it its not required to edit, but there are benefits such as access to image uploads, less ads, access to the wiki's chatroom and more). 
I have self-established rules for the content of the wiki to be neutral (as in the since where it is not religiously biased, but more about the historicty of biblical content). Content such as the Yahweh page are written as Yahweh, instead of God to keep religious neutrality. I was wondering if users agreed, or disapproved of my descision to have articles such as Yahweh, Jesus, Lucifer, and other spiritual figures that could be religiously offensive, protected in order to keep religious neutrality. For this I allow users to post on the talk page to make suggestions. I would hope to in the future to enable a system where other users can contribute, but have approved posting system for those sorts of pages.
Second, I was wondering perhaps that certain content would not be covered, or interperted differently in the Jewish, and Christian views that aren't covered (in the sense of this sites neutrality ) in both bibles. I am referring to for example, whether Jesus would be documented as Yahweh's son, or not. Other content such as the existence of Lillith falls under these terms.  <ac_metadata title="Content Discussion" notify_everyone="1396993015"> </ac_metadata>