All-Nfeśfënm Discussion on Danish Sovereignty

"Comrades, today I ask the Delegation a question: who, or what, defines a nation and it's borders? Who defines a people - and their nationhood?
It seems many within our People's Assembley and United Republic, at large, have come to the conclusion that Manley Dëš does - so many have rallied around this figure -Butcher of Gelton, and Subjugator of "Foodburg"- on the matter of the so-called "Danish Nation" and I must ask, in ultimate sincerity: why?
Firstly, popular vote already had Dëš's Political Rights stripped, yet he's found influence -in effect- through a loophole in colluding with the Glimenhavən Revolutionary Committee; surely, we live in a society of Justice and People's Rule, if Dëš had any legitamte intention he'd have appealed the aformentioned ruling through Party means - by choosing elsewise, he's demonstrated flagrant disregard for the political line of the common people he's so many times claimed to adhere to and act upon.
Further, Dëš has claimed to act in my and our parties' names - this is a complete embarrasment for the United Republic on the international stage, and has made fools of us in Fredon and Danish (to a lesser extent) perception. I ask, again with complete sincerity, for what reason is this necessity? It seems the old, evil Anti-Blueism is stricking our nati0n again and in sending us to Left-Deviation has brought us to a most fictitious distortion of the events of the latest war against Jacobianism - although we do not agree with the UFSR's actions here, it is entirely destructive to try and see this escalate to war!
Do we not see this is Dëš's usual strategy - to divide up the common people and stoke the fires of base urge and impulse: the last times he did this we saw the destruction of Danish life and liberty, and before that heinous slaughter on Gelton's streets. Do we truly wish to invite Nfeśfënm to suffer these terrible fates, too?
Further yet, I should like to condemn Glimenhavən Revolutionary Committee, the adoption of this "Resolution for the Re-incorporation of Northern Fefnenia" represents a higher-yet stage of destructive deviationism - not only did they attempt to legislate command of troops outside of their jurisdiction to engage in matters outside their purview, but they also are causing abject risk to International Security, which could lead to a conflict between Sororal Socialist Countries that would doom the World Revolution.
Frankly, I must ask these forces of left-deviation in our country: why die for "Denmark"?
Thank you."
- Cassidy Lyle's Speech "Why Die for Denmark", Delivered to Nfeśfënmnë Peoples' Assembly on the 3rd of May, 165RE, initiated the All-Nfeśfënm Discussion on Danish Sovereignty