Report 785

Report #785
Skillset: Skill: Disrupt/EQ
 Org: Blacktalon Status: Completed Feb 2012
Furies' Decision:
We will implement solution 1.
Problem: It is currently possible for 2 people with active disrupt skills to
keep someone permanently off equilibrium with very little effort. This provides
situations where it is impossible to escape from or hinder either of the casters
to lead up to an escape as you need equilibrium to move or act. Here is a short
log where I am kept off-eq by two pyromancers for about 13
seconds...http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14340896/whispers2.html.
[A: 0 R: 0] Solution #1: While concentrating from a disrupt, make it so you
 can not be disrupted again until you regain
 equilibrium
[A: 0 R: 0] Solution #2: Add a period of 'disrupt immunity' like stun immunity
 for a period of 3 seconds from the moment you
 concentrate, this way you gain eq and have at least 1
 second to perform at action before you can be
 disrupted again
Player Comments:
---[Sidd on 2/9 @ 14:31 writes]:
This is intended to affect all fors of disruption from active disrupts(whispers
etc) to even unlucky tics from shivering.
---[Morshoth on 2/9 @ 18:30 writes]:
I like solution 1, as it will still be able to keep someone of EQ, but will
require a lot more thought and timing by those attempting it.
---[Neos on 2/9 @ 18:33 writes]:
Solution 1 for sure.
---[Shuyin on 2/9 @ 19:19 writes]:
Solution 1 is my preferred course of action, because it mimics sleep attacks
---[Akui on 2/9 @ 21:59 writes]:
Solution 1 addresses things nicely.
---[Xenthos on 2/9 @ 22:55 writes]:
Solution 1 is pretty good, though I also like 2.
---[Ushaara on 2/10 @ 00:13 writes]:
Solution 1 supported.
---[Shedrin on 2/10 @ 04:48 writes]:
Solution 1 sounds good.
---[Xena on 2/10 @ 04:49 writes]:
Solution 1 Agreed.
---[Viynain on 2/10 @ 05:39 writes]:
Solution 1.
---[Draylor on 2/10 @ 16:03 writes]:
I have no issue with either of the suggestions presented here
---[Azula on 2/10 @ 16:13 writes]:
Support for solution 1
---[Tacita on 2/10 @ 16:28 writes]:
Solution 1 works.
---[Ixion on 2/10 @ 18:12 writes]:
Sol 1, sure.
---[Sondayga on 2/10 @ 19:39 writes]:
Solution 1 sounds fine.
---[Llandros on 2/12 @ 19:49 writes]:
Solution 1, a small change that addresses the issue.
---[Janalon on 2/14 @ 11:54 writes]:
Support for solution 1.
---[Rivius on 2/15 @ 04:30 writes]:
Solution 1 is simplest, and this change is definitely necessary.