End-Goal Refuted

-You cannot use regular rules of logic when trying to figure out what the inner-nature is of the A-Ideal. Because you first have to determine if they are truly universal laws or merely ones confined to your own section of infinite existence. 
-End-Goal argues that the A-Ideal is composed of an infinite number of things which add their substances up to equal the nature of the A-Ideal and that this constitutes the Internal-Action. But there is no way to prove that this is a universal law. Things adding up may be entirely constrained to our own section of reality. All our conceptions of math might be? 
-Universal laws of reality work by anticipating the unknown, much as the A-Ideal claims to be the sum of all, anything unknown would instantly be added to it. Creator does not have this. 
-As such, we cannot know the inner nature of the A-Ideal because our tools to acquire it cannot all be shown to be definitively universal. 
-So what if A-Ideal is composed of addition? That could just be one system of infinity out of many! 
-End-Goal Refuted
>Addition may be inevitable, it may also be one of an infinite number of systems!
>What if Creaotr concept is too broad and goes beyond the nature of A-Ideal!? What then!?
*See Regional Vs Universal Principles. 
Category:Infinity Theology