Personhood

-The kernel of Theist TTB is the question of "why not just be about God?" After all, He's the infinite being. Why not make Him the center of your Umbrella-Model? 
>Because of Personhood.
>A person cannot be known. Concepts are clearly preferable to people because they are simple and can be concretely known. God is unknown, has allowed some evil in the past, and the exact level of intervention He exhibits is unknown.
>Personhood brings with it the baggage of the unknown.
>Theist will counter that we need to trust God and invoke Go-Negative/Protected-Knowledge. But isn't the reverse true? If we can't know the concept of Creator concretely, than can we honestly believe God protects knowledge enough for us to know Him or anything at all!?
== Notes General: ==
-The idea that the A-Ideal possesses a will of Its own will always introduce doubt in the form of freewill. You can never be wholly certain that God's actions or thoughts won't be something else than what you expected. 
-Any attempt to prove that God can never be anything than what any concept expectes fail in the face of Unknowability. You can never be sure there isn't something else in A-Infinity that *somehow* changes God's mind to something else than expected. 
-
Category:Metaphysics
Category:Creator
Category:Infinity Theology
Category:Anchors
Category:Anchor