Da'Trick?

-If the A-Ideal can be anything and do anything, than can't It exist as something with parts but break the laws of reality so that It counts as having no parts? Wouldn't this render all logic in Infinity Theology pointless?
>No, because Infinity Theology, like Platonism, takes place in the world of the ideals where things are obvious to the mind. The point is to figure out the world of the ideals and then see if that translates into our Actualized world.
-Besides, the A-Ideal is capable of anything, including always knowing how to exist as one thing which can do and be all things. Ergo, why would It ever exist as parts but make Itself count as parts?
Category:Creator
Category:Metaphysics