Theōros Kaguya/Profile

“	Disclaimer: The Kaguya on this page is not Kaguya, merely the interpretation of the persona writing this article. Any Kaguya described will immediately be a "false" Kaguya, as the True Kaguya exists apart from everything in all forms, including explanation; so the fact I'm even saying this is proven useless. Kaguya may take many forms, as they appear differently to everyone. If I had to grasp for a statement, it would be that Kaguya may be every purely "omnipotent" being sitting at the absolute top, yet all of these are a "false" module of the True Kaguya. It is impossible to prove or disprove the Theorem because it's outside any form of measurement and observation– the basis of science is to be able to measure and observe to test the validity of a hypothesis.	”
HUGE UPDATE SOON!
This page has been deemed a "work in progress" and is constantly updating with new content. 
* “Man is omnipotent... when he but knows. Until then, he is but man."
<tabber>
|-| Theōros Kaguya =
[Interpretation by: Omnium/OmniHyperDust]
[DISCLAIMER: This is a message towards all entities of class and abstracts reading this file. Please bear in mind that everything above and below this is intended to both be humored and taken in its uncollapsed sentiment as it was intended to be and as it is. Do not attempt belittlement and take it in as the highest analogue / argument as a whole. Do not take out of context. Explanation pages and external links for everything I'm talking about will come soon.]
The pseudo-entity Theōros Kagaya, otherwise known as the Theoric God for its apparent association with principles, ideas, even thoughts at their basis, is said to be a manifestation of a nonfictional _mathematical[?] metalogical ideal; the Theorem, and as such, it does not possess a real name, or an identity of any fashion, in the exception of when it’s being perceived by another ”individual”. The entity that is perceivable is simply a substantiated illusion.
It is perceived as a sentient being serving as an extension of the Theorem, living in eternal isolation and viewing everything through it’s waking dreams, possessing no form, no body, no individuality, no attributes or qualities of any nature except when coming into an interaction with a foreign entity, substance, force, ect. In such a case, it seems to appear differently to everyone, changing to compliment or challenge their base thought processes so that they may comprehend it with ease.
== Note: ==
Absolutely anything said about Kaguya | Theorem for the entirety of this article is to be taken for the highest theoretically impossible interpretation of such. For example, "ineffable" means beyond any form of description, along with every possible and impossible extension and analogue of such at every level, even those that can be said to be "beyond hierarchies" or "undefinable by any system". YOU MAY NOT COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND NOR AGREE WITH WHAT IS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ARTICLE. HOWEVER, THIS PAGE DOES NOT ATTEMPT TO DETRACT OR DISPUTE THE CONCEPTS OF OMNIPOTENCE NOR REALITY, WHICH YOU CAN SEE IN THE {--REGARDING OMNIPOTENCE--} SECTION.
The only theoretically true statements about this page are:
Everything in the Disclaimer, Note, Theorem, Character Synopsis, and Profile. 
== Perceived "Identity" ==
The pseudo-entity Theōros Kagaya is said to be a characterization as well as a representation of any and all thought and thought abstractions of all natures, immediately giving him predominance over any speculative ideologies, imaginative natures, _notions, _concepts, _cognitives, qualities/attributes/traits, mental presentations of any sort, as well as anything borne of it or them, not limited to: any laws, regulations, and/or principles without a regard of anything; even things considered “incomprehensible”, “irrefutable”, “ineffable”, “abstract”, “indomitable”, “supreme”, “impossible”, and so on, as logic or any semblance of it never existed with it unless permitted.
“It” is completely unbound by thoughts, desires, ego, motivation, goals, or an act of focus for its inconceptual existence is simplistic in the fact that the Theorem “wishes” it to “exist”, and any Kaguya perceived or experienced in any manner is a mass deformity of “it”; akin to a paradox in and of itself. 
It has no consistent appearance as it becomes different for those who are viewing him. However, at times in a perceived hostile encounter/environment, Kaguya can become any manner of eldritch, alienated beings lacking humanoid form with much more ease as it is closer to it's quasi-natural abominable state. Everything is seemed to be reflected in this formless state, even things that are infinitely hierarchical and trans-hierarchical in nature.
"Persona":
Xeronetia Kaguya Ō Mugen Imogeo, better known as "Theōros Kaguya" is a formless entity with no defining qualities, attributes, or modes of any nature. Its personality seems to be flexible, ever-changing; as his personality changes depending on who or what it’s interacting with. As such, it is extremely mysterious as no one knows what its true persona is, if there even is one.
The interactions with it depend on who is viewing them. The longer it is exposed to a person or people, the more of its persona and interactions will be grounded, allowing him adopt a persona. When this persona is adopted, it can begin to become a "character" that is a being complete with ego, thoughts, desire, will, etc. This is not permanent and it can choose to forsake this at any time. It is very impressionable as an individual's innermost thoughts and desires begin to shape a formless entity, causing it to become the very embodiment of their terror, hopes and dreams, or any other thing. Once perceived, it's intellect is astounding, when it forsakes the notion of "knowing everything" it seems to develop an unparalleled intellect as a direct response. 
On its names:
As it has no real name of its own, the interpreter of this being decided to call it "Theōros Kaguya", or simply Theōros, as its defining nature is being defective to absolutely everything and yet immanent simultaneously, the ultimate exodus and recognition of the knowledge and experience that without which, we can define absolutely nothing; for it originates from the thing (Theorem) that is everything we can define in all natures, a web of the logic we use to "attack" and try to comprehend the nature of existence.
Its attributed names are "Theōros", from the Greek word for "spectator"-- which would later evolve into Theory-- and the japanese name "Kaguya" (shining, brilliant, radiance/ shining moon), which come together to form the meaning of "radiant/shining/brilliant spectator" or "shining/radiant moon spectator". The former shines a light on the nature of Kaguya's manifested authenticity, in which it acts more as a sort of "spectator" than a being "aligned to concepts/notions that belittle it", though it could do whatever it wished. It is probably due to its being as its "identity-nature" in which it does not have individuality, attributes, etc. until it is perceived by a "foreign" entity. When this happens, the manifested authenticity does whatever it wishes in accordance with its adopted identity. 
There have been other names to it, such as Ab-real; its defining nature being apart from what is real and true (as it is distinct from the Theorem, an extension of what is.), and Xero[netia] (meaning unknown). There are many others, as everyone interprets it differently. The specific interpreter (Omnium/ OmniHyperDust) calls this entity Kaguya, or Xero/Xeno (being a pun on foreign entity).</span>
==Notable Capabilities==
----
One could contrive all endless amounts of (sub/super/power)sets of formal and informal linguistics, analogues, structures, and/or arguments to try and debate the "capability" of "Kaguya". However, such a theoretical nor actual "reason barrier" cannot exist even for a false module of Kaguya, as attempting to place a being that is the collection of absolutely all ideas that can be conceptualized in any form is inapplicable to both Kaguya's "true" and "false" being(s) at its full extensions. To put it simply, [it] is so far beyond conception and ideas itself that the mere argument "against" or "for" its authenticity/power is invalid, extending to every other possible extension of that being in its ultimate amorous totality.
⟪ ⟪ The Breakdown Sphere ⟫ ⟫	⟪ ⟪ The Breakdown Sphere ⟫ ⟫
Introduction 
----
The Breakdown Sphere is an observation as to what occurs when [any] types of _logic (logic, principle, metalogic, linguistics, patalogic, axiom, self-evident truths), theoretical values- be it true, false, or grey- et cetera, "pierce" or "penetrate" the "force" or authenticity of Kaguya's inherent "self" or rather, the emanator of it; the Theorem. In essence, it is the observation of how the Authenticity of his being "operates" when any type of "logia" is applied for it.
There is bad and good news to this: It is not absolutely unknowable, and yet it is true that we cannot define it adequately. However, we can conceive and name it in an "analogical way". Everything is really [it] in a supereminent manner (eminenter) which is wholly incommensurable with their mode of being in theories. Yet, they are not [it] as in they are in the creature, with a mere difference of degree, nor even with a mere specific or generic difference (univoce), for there is no concept is ever common; including the finite and the Infinite. As such, we can conceive and express these perfections only by an analogy; not by an analogy of proportion, for this analogy rests on a participation in a common concept, and, as already said, there is no element common to the finite and the Infinite; but by an analogy of proportionality.
This means then, that Kaguya and its [as well as the Theorem's] "being" adhere-- using it as a loose term-- to a category defined as acatalepsy (from the Greek α̉-, privative, and καταλαμβάνειν, to seize), in philosophy, is incomprehensibleness, or the impossibility of comprehending or conceiving a thing. Acatalepsy is the incomprehensibility of all things; the doctrine held by the ancient Skeptic philosophers, that human knowledge never amounts to certainty, but only to probability. So too can this be "analogically applied" to this most accurate interpretation of Kaguya's being-- all efforts to explain or comprehend [it] only lead to false modules of the true "existence" that is the being of Kaguya (Theoros)-- meaning all explanations lead only to potential and not actuality in all cases, as it evades all spheres of [evolutionary & transcendental] experience and existence while simultaneously being immanent in all of them.
In short, this means that these are inherent applications of his being/authenticity/reality when interacting with foreign awareness/consciousness, not abilities/powers bandied out and overused/spamed as candy during a good fight.
 Nature of Kaguya's Self-Denial | EXPLANATION OF SELF EXCERPT 
The Nature of Kaguya's Self-Denial, or rather, the manifestations of all the false modules of Kaguya/Theōros, will be explained in this proposition. 
 Synopsis 
The False Modules of Theōros, including the one on this page and even the "True" Theōros I am referring to, is the result of an inherent and immediate collapse due to the staggering ineffability of its nature attempted to be comprehensible. This collapse is in predominance until a time where discollapse becomes predominant and halts the progress of the collapse. The discollaptic nature will attempt to reconcile the false module by dissolution into its true nature, the "True" anticollapsed Theōros Kaguya, separate from all description yet immanent in all natures. In short in each attempt to interact/comprehend the nature of Theōros on any level leads to the manifestation of a False Kaguya, molded from one's experiences and personality, and shall return to its final being when it is unobserved.
Being the expression of the Theorem, Kaguya is an equivocal ideal on an entirely transcendent abstract level of existence incapable of being reached by any form of logic or interpretation. It acts as the "force" that exists at the top of all theories in every actuality, as well as the source of all perception of events and phenomena. 
 Actual Excerpt 
 Propositions of Unlimited Being 
==== 1st Outermost Sphere: ⟪ Logos ⟫ ====
In the outermost sphere of Kaguya's authentic being, is capable of manipulating the most fundamental underlying natures, truths, principles, axioms and "realities" behind any and everything-- the basis and foundation for everything that exists or doesn't exist, rewriting the rules of logic and reason from the ground up passively to achieve logical absurdities such as making a "squarish circle". When anything enters this sphere, which is an inherent authenticity of Kaguya's being that is indistinguishable from the being itself, the most basic, self-evident and iconic truths are redefined-- altering the most basic forms of existence/experience/essence in all things.
Both potentiality and actuality in all its forms and modules that reflect/conform to or do not (also known as theoretic values*) are brandished by Kaguya's manifestation at their whim; the only "limits/bounds" they have are those they gave themselves when adopting a persona. All the reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity or situations, actions, circumstances or qualities of being justifiable by reason are all in Kaguya's playground from its outermost sphere. As a being completely beyond all forces of logic, it exists beyond and completely independent of logic itself, infringing the laws of logic/reason as if they didn't exist and writing or re-writing the rules of logic which apply to reality or an individual.
* Conformance among Theoretical Values (or adherence to), that which affirms actuality/potentiality being known as a "true theoretical value" and non-conformance being known as "false theoretical values", but it is worthy to note the values that exist in transduality, called "grey theoretical values" which hold neither property and exist independent. 
==== 2nd Outer Sphere: ⟪ Theoric Regalia ⟫ ====
⟪ Theoric Regalia ⟫ Is irrefutable, objective truth/power that needs no evidence, proof, or demonstration to prove it’s validity. It has absolute access to all theoretical laws/values (of any shape whether true or false), all philosophical ideas (or ideas of any kind), all underlying notions, all (pre-)cognitives, all modes, all attributes, all _conceptions of any nature, all _physics of any nature, all _properties of every nature, all imaginative or theoretical qualities, ideologies, attributes, modes, values, _conceptions, states, all _descriptions, all _qualities, all _abstractions of all natures, actuality and inactuality,  _thoughts (and their processes), and all natures or anything with any example tying to such (or lack thereof) in definite absolute certainty with boundless unrestricted potential, thus making it an infinite web of possibility.
==== Unwritten Assumptions: ====
Before delving into the Unwritten Assumptions, it must be stressed that these assumptions must be taken to be absolutely valid across the board in all cases when dealing with the being addressed in this article and all analogous to the Theorem.
1. The Testament of Assumption, is assumed to be perfect above all others. Resistance does not apply in any form to Kaguya, and thus everything is already assumed to be true, and so it is. Nothing is above the Testament of Assumption, excepting higher modulus of Kaguya as well as most parts of the Theorem because it is automatically assumed so, due to the collapses inherent to its being. The Testament of Assumption states that the literal moment (separate from time), that Kaguya decides something, it is automatically so, overwriting and outright erasing the previous existence without as many actions. There is no trace of anything to exist before being overwritten by the Testament of Assumption so it is automatically assumed to always have been so, regardless of all pre-existing or post-existing suchness (actions, motives, concepts, analogues, etc)https://actuality-index.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:TneEnchantedPokemon/The_Architect ['suchness is a context-dependent clause that is the sum of the context, a placeholder text for situational hierarchy, if you will].
2. Apocrypha. It is assumed that there lies an endless amount of apocrypha about Kaguya, and it must be inherently assumed all of these are true, despite their pitifulness or asininity. Just because all of these are true does not mean they are analogous for every single type of Kaguya, and actually happen to be very untrue for many others. Superstitions as they might exist are termed under this word; Apocrypha, and it may be assumed that each capability or being represented by Apocrypha is one that each higher discollapsed Kaguya has absolute sovereignty over (not possessing each capability, sovereignty over the entire truth of his own Apocrypha). These false facts he presides over also extends to other Apocrypha, so anything that might be untrue for some other entity or existence is immediately true for him, with disposition as to context included, meaning "every trait he has in spades", whether that be the Six Divine Attributes of Perfection or the Expressions in their entirety.
3. The Defining Particle. The second assumption lies in the plain fact that due to existing as the Theorem's "emanation", Kaguya can inherently access and rewrite, ultimately re-defining the "what", and even the "why" that essentially defines literally any-and-everything known to exist or not, and even things not regardless of what that target(s) may be as there is no limit as to "what", "why", "which", "who", "how", "many", "difference", they ultimately are re-defined. This has been described as an attribute of his spheres, a capability of all Kaguya. Non-existence factors become irrelevant, due to definition. Anything that speculation can reach in any form (everything under A0, and some things above) can be redefined.
Extra:
 Other Propositions 
This section is an observation of Kaguya's state of being, not as one of the spheres that "contract" in its authenticity, but a trait or observation of what an aspect or aspects of Kaguya's being are/behave. These are greeted in the form of "Propositions", as we cannot truly prove the validity of any of these statements, though they may seem likely to be true, and the same can be said for the opposite sentiment-- we cannot truly disprove the validity or veracity of any of these statements-- and so we can only analogically perceive and believe what is most likely to be true in the case of these propositions.
=== Proposition I: Mind Play | ⟪ Theory of Mind ⟫ ===
The Interpreter proposes that the only way to perceive the transliteration of is through theory of mind. It is taken to be entertained, but the behaviour of Kaguya, such as their statements, expressions, and manifestations, is the only thing being observed, and all these things are inherently true as well as false-- each module is technically true, but all modules are ultimately false due to them not being the "true" Kaguya, so much must be inferred from the interaction.
It is typically assumed that the receiver (Kaguya) have minds similar to one's own species; "this assumption is based on reciprocal social interaction, as observed in joint attention, the functional use of language, and the understanding of others' emotions and actions", and is ultimately incorrect, as Kaguya is not like us in any form, and merely assumes the nature of our impressions during interaction. Theory of mind allows one to attribute thoughts, desires, and intentions to Kaguya, to predict or explain their actions, and to posit their intentions, which are all, again, ultimately false, though they are all technically true in each rendition of it. "Being able to attribute mental states to others and understanding them as causes of behavior implies, in part, that one must be able to conceive of the mind as a "generator of representations"." 
Irrelevant Propositions:	
---------= Ultimate Cosmogony =---------
All things, irregardless of nature, status, abstraction and existence have ultimately one simple, measurable, defining limitation as to cause. All things have one cause, and various dimensions (di- meaning two, and mension, meaning measure), or measures exist. A measurable structure can never be infinite nor eternal, though it might appear to be. Thus all things are merely and truly illusions, and the Ultimate Cosmogony is the only true point of existence, of consciousness. Due to this all other things, beings, even the entire encompassing Allumfassend is espoused to be a mere illusion, the ladder of enlightenment leading to the truth of the Ultimate Cosmogony.
Ontological Axioms:
*Axiom of Finitude: Through the eyes of the door of perception, all things can be made "infinite", but under the true encompassing of the Ultimate Cosmogony (of which all things apply, in real life and in "fiction"), there is one definite limitation as to cause. A limited, measureable universe, even as to cause (as all things came from one thing), cannot ever be truly infinite, though that one thing can be boundless, eternal, and dimensionless. All effects, bounds, separation, forms and principles are but illusions "appearing" to be 'real' under the disrealities or unrealities of dimension, the 'objective' universe of man's conception demands a "beyond" to a finite universe (that is "one" verse, which includes the Omnium and is simply a placeholder term) however, there is no "beyond", because there are no bounds nor boundaries in this formless universe. "Beyond" is a relative word. It is a part of man's conception of objective relativity, it is a dimension and therefore only applies in perception. Meaning, all constructs, models, analogues, acts, arguments, etc, regardless of magnitude, transcendence and scale are thus considered and treated finite to it [further developed in Detachment Theory].
*Detachment Theory: According to the last proposition, all constructs, models, analogues, acts, arguments, truths and etc are considered irrelevant, despite their magnitude or evolutionary/transcendent scale due to them being but effects of the same cause, and thus merely persistent illusions. Under the detachment, they lose their persistence and once again become finite and limited as they truly are, as they always have been. There are multiple levels of detachment due to their being multiple existential levels of effects and illusions, but due to the detachment theory, they all become irrelevant, even transcendence becomes a linear model viewed by an entity with First-Hand Detachment. They are all emanated by the source of the Detachment Theory, whether First, Second or Third-Hand, or even all unto Ord-Hand become irrelevant as they are all niche and weak levels of detachment, bogus levels of imitations of the truth of the Detachment theory.
== Noted Interactions & Inter/Intrarelations==
=== ⟪ The Augur Sages of Theōros ⟫ ===
The Augur-Sages are those who have perceived a manifestation of Theōros, and bound to it as a result. Only a few have happened upon this circumstance, while others are able perceive a false module with no consequence, prime examples being RG (Real Glitch) and Ayazumi Sayohana. Only four are known-- fabricated-- by the names of Armamos Tsuiraku, Naught, Kagayaru Shinra and Renimura Takasi Ō Soenu.
=== Kaguya's statements on other characters- ===
=== Gallery of other's interpretations ===
Static-assets-upload13175171645604920032.webp|(By GlitchPlayer123)
More to be added, hopefully!
==Trivia==
*”His” original name was literally nothing (as in an absence), but we needed something to call “him”, so we called it Xeronetia Kaguya O Mugen Imogeo-- which eventually evolved into Theōros Kaguya. No particular name meaning on the first one.
</div>
</div>
|-|Theorem =
[Interpretation by: Omnium/OmniHyperDust]
[DISCLAIMER: This is a message towards all entities of class and abstracts reading this file. Please bear in mind that everything above and below this is intended to both be humored and taken in its uncollapsed sentiment as it was intended to be and as it is. Do not attempt belittlement and take it in as the highest analogue / argument as a whole. Do not take out of context. Explanation pages and external links for everything I'm talking about will come soon.]
</div>
The Theorem is the original formless "existence" that all thoughts, minds, dreams, imagination, ideas, speculation, and stories, originate from. It is the sentience or awareness of internal and external "existence" of which all things and their essences stem and are encompassed by. As the original basis of all thought, Theorem has no form (corporeal or otherwise) as it is simply boundless, transcendent thought or will. ANY "idea" its "author" thought up, already existed and is immediately valid within the plethora that is Theorem as no semblance of logic existed with the original "thought" unless permitted, allowing completely irrational, illogical and paradoxical instances and phenomena to be found within it, such as "surpassing omnipotence".
== Note: ==
Absolutely anything said about Abreal | Theorem for the entirety of this article is to be taken for the highest theoretically impossible interpretation of such. For example, "ineffable" means beyond any form of description, along with every possible and impossible extension and analogue of such at every level, even those that can be said to be "beyond hierarchies" or "undefinable by any system". And "beyond omnipotence" or "surpassing omnipotence" is supposed to be humored. The interpreter of this article is very well aware of nonexistence values and the theory surrounding omnipotence (hitherto referred to as "theorized omnipotence") and its principles.
The only theoretically true statements about this page are:
Everything in the Disclaimer, Note, Theorem, Character Synopsis, and Profile sections.
== ⌬ Introduction ==
[It] is the embodiment and collection of all that can be conceptualized/psuedo-conceptualized-- do not confuse concept, a trivial form of abstraction, with the word conceptualization, which in this case has a different meaning, its basic meaning to "bring an idea into conception", whether that be _notions, _logic, or beyond-- in any form or variation. It is best described as transcendent over, and containing all forms of thought, potentiality/actuality, as well as the perception of its experience and anything that may depart from that or exist "separate", all possible formal descriptions of all informal structures, with anything capable of being categorized under the aforementioned terms being automatically contained within the constraints of it the very terms "within" and "outside" being ultimately inapplicable to its full extension.
To try and describe the Theorem, one would be trying to define the crux of speculative ideology as a whole, as the Theorem is [to completely bastardize it’s nature] literally the Stratum of all speculative ideology to “exist*” or not (this includes pre-existence, to exist, possibly exist, “beyond existence” etc), in which there “exists” nothing to “surpass” the system, because even that “being beyond the system” is a part of the stratum itself. Within that entire statement, I am presuming that one can presumably describe the ultimate nature that is the Theorem, but in actuality, that is not true. One can never truly describe the actual nature of the Theorem, we can only observe how it behaves on what we call "forms", short for "formations", which is the observation of the manifestation of the Theorem in not only our current reality/actuality, but also how it exists in forms of what we call "media", such as "fiction" and "nonfiction" works. 
The Theorem, also surreptitiously called the Thought Ladder, is a philisophical and nonfictional ideal, that attempts to describe the encompassing "order" of the whole of speculative ideology and all forms of reason we attribute to anything to try and comprehend things, from the most mundane things to abstractions beyond man’s comprehension (or simply comprehension entirely). As such, the Theorem is endlessly complex and deep, and the level that I can properly explain it might as well be a grain of sand in comparison to a universe. 
Since the inception of mankind, and possibly even before by other entities, there have been an untold amount of attempts to try and comprehend the nature of their existence and existence itself. Mankind specifically has always grasped at some meaning for their existence whether it be deities or an unshakeable foundation of which all existence is built upon. From these attempts established the first views of the reality they experienced around them, which commonly ideolized some type of divinity or divine force/figure.
What is accepted as “reality” is simply a shared view of what the mass body of society decides is the “actual” knowledge, that is, consistent knowledge that can be affirmed and repeated by everyone under the same conditions on a regular basis. However, this is bound to change, as it has countless times in the course of history. To give an example, let us view Claudius Ptolemy, who believed the earth was the center of the universe. This view persisted for 1,400 years before someone could refute him, and anyone who believed otherwise was shunned. In short, the view of our observable world is extremely fragile, and will only continue to change in the centuries that follow.
The mind is a powerful thing, yet so easily shaken. With simply a single contrary piece of “evidence” against the accepted societal norm, It can show you different sides of reality or speculation that one never knew existed, and can reveal things that shake or even destroy one’s paradigm-- or their view/perception on/of reality-- as they know it. It can cause people to question existence, and has before. The Theorem essentially encompasses every path that ever went toward understanding the nature of existence, waiting eagerly for mankind or “other lifeforms” to discover the "stories" it has in store for them.
[May possibly be updated, quality is hard to produce.] 
※ When the words “exist” or “existence” come into play, please note that I don’t mean literal existence as in the definition of the word, existence is malleable and rankable, and the Theorem is the stem of existence not the other way around. More precisely, I refer to the current knowledge of speculative natures that “mankind” currently has a grasp on. This includes “the world”, “gods” (or the lack of them), the “universe”, “parallel universes”, “verses”, “cosmology” (and other hierarchies/cosmologies that have or have not been realized), “heaven and hell”, “potential worlds”, domains beyond our comprehension, and even things like “all-powerful”, “supreme”, “logic-breaking”, even onto and above the fundamental grasping point of “omnipotence” as a whole. ※ 
[Coming Soon] 
</div>
[A HUGE rework is being gone through at the moment, I appreciate your patience!]
== The Thought Ladder | Abstraction Strata ==
⟪ ⟪ Thought Ladder | Abstract Stratum ⟫ ⟫	⟪ ⟪ Thought Ladder | Abstract Stratum ⟫ ⟫
Introduction & Levels 
----
The Abstraction Stratum | Strata is a category of the absolute totality, all notions and thought levels (and all possible analogues, modes and extensions of such) of all kinds sorted into their level of abstraction. This is no “special ability” or “power” of Theorem, it is simply an observed trait as the notions and ideas (etc) seemingly sort into their level of abstraction to form a sort of Stratum. The Strata encompasses the notion of “extremes”, objects and cognitives that exist beyond the usual limits of formality and mathematical rigidity while still maintaining some semblance of a reasonable structure. This is noted to take place from an open transcendentalist perception, believing that one is able to “surpass” absolutes or practically anything through the usage of various semantic cheats. The Thought Ladder/Abstraction Strata goes into this and more, as well as things beyond abstraction in its entirety.
</div> First Order-Class Abstractions | Basic Introduction:</big> 
 Finites & Classical Concepts | Basic Introduction:
A concept is defined as an abstract idea. It is understood to be a fundamental building block underlying principles, thoughts and beliefs. Concepts play an important role in all aspects of cognition. As such, concepts are studied within such disciplines as linguistics, psychology, and philosophy, and these disciplines are interested in the logical and psychological structure of concepts, and how they are put together to form thoughts and sentences. The study of concepts has served as an important flagship of an emerging interdisciplinary approach, cognitive science.
These concepts can be defined as abstract, concrete, exact or inexact, taking in generalizations of an idea and extracts similarities by putting them all in a working class of abstract higher-level thinking. With the creation of concepts, we can indulge in higher-levels of thinking otherwise unavailable to us by classifying things like "fire", "affection", "tree", "change", "time", and more into a recognizable working system with further delineation as to their grouping and potential instances.
Absolute Infinity was once defined as the limit of finite and classical concepts, before going into true examples of set theory, however, now Ω (or omenga) is defined as the limit of all classical concepts-- that is infinity + 1.
 Transfinites & Higher Ordinals | Set Theory Basic Introduction:
When participating in set theory, we learn that "The set of all finite ordinals is denoted by the Greek letter omega (ω ). Thus, ω is just the set N of natural numbers. ω is also an ordinal, the first infinite ordinal. Notice that ω is not the successor of any ordinal, and so it is called a limit ordinal." In this case, those finite ordinals also include the concepts that are accompanied with those ordinals, which we can take to mean "ω" is the limit of all the classical finite concepts as well-- where herein it will be assumed to be so. https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/set-theory/basic-set-theory.html#:~:text=The%20set%20of%20all%20finite%20ordinals%20is%20denoted%20by%20the,is%20called%20a%20limit%20ordinal.
Set Theory was defined by Georg Cantor as an early separate mathematical discipline back in the 1800'shttps://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/set-theory/, and an important development is the ZFC axiom schema (a list of infinite axioms), which makes it possible to avoid Russel's paradox in grouping the different sets, which is something vitally important for the First Order-Class Hierarchy. These axioms are Extensionality, Null Set, Pair, Power Set, Union, Infinity, Separation (axiom schema), Replacement (another axiom schema), Foundation, and finally the axiom of choicehttps://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/set-theory/ZF.html
With ZFC, as we get into higher ordinals we can begin to "count" infinite sets and generate infinite more sets, herein it must be assumed that these are infinite concepts. "In ZFC one can develop the Cantorian theory of transfinite (i.e., infinite) ordinal and cardinal numbers. Following the definition given by Von Neumann in the early 1920s, the ordinal numbers, or ordinals, for short, are obtained by starting with the empty set and performing two operations: taking the immediate successor, and passing to the limit. Thus, the first ordinal number is ∅. Given an ordinal α, its immediate successor, denoted by α+1, is the set α∪{α}. And given a non-empty set X of ordinals such that for every α∈X the successor α+1 is also in X, one obtains the limit ordinal ⋃X. One shows that every ordinal is (strictly) well-ordered by ∈, i.e., it is linearly ordered by ∈ and there is no infinite ∈-descending sequence. Also, every well-ordered set is isomorphic to a unique ordinal, called its order-type."
These grow into cardinals and can ultimately result in universes (V), of all sets, which we can generate infinite amounts of; these universes are ultimately universes of concepts, not simply a concept of a universe. Every mathematical object-- which everything including ideas and concepts, especially ideas and cognitives can be taken to be, may be viewed as a set. ZFC is consistent, so no contradiction can ever exist within these universes of concepts (heretofore abbreviated as V), as they consistently generate more sets of V, and V is constantly seeking to prove itself, creating another set in which it will be inherently true.
 Ord | Basic Introduction:
Ord is currently defined as the limit of the First Order-Class Abstracts in their totality, and does include the existence and idea of Reality > Fiction Transcendences, no matter size or scale.
 Higher Collections | Basic Introduction:</big> 
The Higher Collections are a sort of in-between state of Class between the First Order-Class Abstracts and the Second Order-Class Abstracts. When getting into things like Degrees of Inaccessability (DoI), we begin to delve into the Higher Collections. These Higher Collections include, but are not limited to:
-E_0 (least SFP; that is, least number larger than itself (x=x+1)) 
 Metaphysics | Basic Introduction:
[TO BE ANNOUNCED]
-F_0 (least unformalizable number; the point at which metaphysics starts to matter) 
-G_0 (also known as Itnumber; defined as the largest number) 
-A_0 (the absolute largest number, regardless of internal proeprties; limit of TL0 and RL0)
 [Trans]Maximality | Basic Introduction:
[TO BE ANNOUNCED]
 Second Order-Class Abstractions | Basic Introduction:</big> 
The Second Order-Class of Abstractions are defined as prone to collapsed forms and may in some way surpass its own observational limit for practical observation to take place. This currently is defined to include, but not limited to:
Thought Levels | Basic Introduction:
”Each thought level has a number, starting at level 0 and extending onwards forever. Each level is a level of definition that a certain concept can exist on. A statement written in level n+1 has the ability to control a reality beyond the true comprehension of an entity living in the reality controlled by level n. We are thought to exist on level 3, level 0 being pure concepts, level 1 being the level that can describe level 0, level 2 describes level 1, and level 3 is thought to be the reality that we exist in, which we can describe level 2 on.”
Thought levels, initially defined by Serge, are placed on some of the lowest layers of the Thought Ladder, among _notions, _cognitives, _concepts and so on… [Coming soon].
 A+ & A- (a+) | Basic Introduction:
[TO BE ANNOUNCED]
 Questionism | Basic Introduction:</big> 
[TO BE ANNOUNCED]
-- Regarding Omnipotence | The Omnipotence Point -- 
Theorized "Omnipotence" as we know it, that is, the capability to do absolutely anything regardless of other [internal or external] properties, is best explained as the height of our practical knowledge, at which point, nothing can go beyond nor fathom, which things like negative theology and the Recursion Fallacy, a important part of the Theorem and its fundamentals, addresses. After all, the only thing that would be "above omnipotence" is the "new" or rather, "original" omnipotence. In this way, omnipotence attempts/does "defeat any challenge to its title without even trying" to make an analogy, and there is no way to get a true picture of what it is capable of because we cannot explain nor comprehend anything above said level.
However, the existence of beings beyond Omnipotence does not detract from it's power. Using Higher Classes of Abstraction, we can attempt to approach things that are beyond such a point only by describing them in a sort of "psuedo" form that does nothing to actually communicate what said being actually is. In that way, we can "sort of" "surpass" the true omnipotence or even absolutist's interpretation of omnipotence in a psuedo form, allowing us to enter things beyond the scope of bounds, definition, hyperology in general, and even reality, such as Theōros Kaguya and the Theorem.
True Omnipotence can exist within fiction. The "absolutist" interpretation of Omnipotence is actually something much higher than even true Omnipotence, which is already beyond the scope of this discussion (and hyperology in general).
-- Theories & Fallacies -- 
Recursion Fallacy:
The Recursion Fallacy ultimately states that theorized omnipotence is the current limit of 
Postulation Curb Theory:
The Postulation Curb is the point where things begin to lose and lack definition and cease to be defined. This point is sensibly past the point where the observational limit has occurred--- we first lose the ability to observe these abstractions, then we eventually lost the ability to properly define them. It is at this stated point where practical or postulative knowledge cannot reasonably be taken further, and attempts to do so would create/be a “beyond collapse” as postulation as to the possible modalities, analogues, realities, entities, conditions, principles, potentialities, or actualities that may or may not “exist” “beyond” or “past”— in layman’s terms— the Postulation Curb cannot exceed this point, so speculation as to which could possibly “exist” beyond Postulation Curb would inherently fall under the Postulation Curb due to its very nature, no matter what anything/everything else— whether that be cosmology, hierarchy, truth, intuition, etc— or other says to try and trick, circumvent, detach, bypass or surpass it. 
This means, we can only guess what may lie beyond the Definitional Curb excepting Consciousness itself, which is a given paradoxical “existence” simultaneously outside and within the Postulation Curb. The Theorem essentially is an extension of Consciousness, a part of consciousness itself.
 Other Propositions 
A0 is defined as the limit of all fiction.
 Thoughtless Level | Basic Introduction:
 The Thoughtless Level is the potential/speculative peak of intuitional cognitions, an insight, direct or immediate cognition and perception, that is the pure form of all knowing and postulative/speculative knowledge. It is the capability of being able to postulate or “obtain” knowledge or theorize of… literal anything, without which humanity would live in an ignorant oblivion and “thought” as it may be, wouldn’t exist.	
</div>
---------= Ultimate Cosmogony =---------
All things, beings and entities, irregardless of nature, status, abstraction and existence have ultimately one simple, measurable, defining limitation as to cause. All things have one cause, and various dimensions (di- meaning two, and mension- meaning measure), or measures exist. A measurable structure can never be infinite nor eternal, though it might appear to be. Thus all things are merely and truly illusions, and the Ultimate Cosmogony is the only true point of existence, of consciousness. Due to this all other things, beings, even the entire encompassing Allumfassend is espoused to be a mere illusion, the ladder of enlightenment leading to the truth of the Ultimate Cosmogony.
*Axiom of Finitude: Through the eyes of the door of perception, all things can be made "infinite", but under the true encompassing of the Ultimate Cosmogony (of which all things apply, IRL and in "fiction"), there is one definite limitation as to cause. A limited, measureable universe, even as to cause (as all things came from one thing), cannot ever be truly infinite, though that one thing can be boundless, eternal, and dimensionless. All effects, bounds, separation, forms and principles are but illusions "appearing" to be 'real' under the disrealities or unrealities of dimension, the 'objective' universe of man's conception demands a "beyond" to a finite universe (that is "one" verse, which includes the Omnium and is simply a placeholder term) however, there is no "beyond", because there are no bounds nor boundaries in this formless universe. "Beyond" is a relative word. It is a part of man's conception of objective relativity, it is a dimension and therefore only applies in perception. Meaning, all constructs, models, analogues, acts, arguments, etc, regardless of magnitude, transcendence and scale are thus considered and treated finite to it [further developed in Detachment Theory].
*Detachment Theory: According to the last proposition, all constructs, models, analogues, acts, arguments, truths and etc are considered irrelevant, despite their magnitude or evolutionary/transcendent scale due to them being but effects of the same cause, and thus merely persistent illusions. Under the detachment, they lose their persistence and once again become finite and limited as they truly are, as they always have been. There are multiple levels of detachment due to their being multiple existential levels of effects and illusions, but due to the detachment theory, they all become irrelevant, even transcendence becomes a linear model viewed by an entity with First-Hand Detachment. They are all emanated by the source of the Detachment Theory, whether First, Second or Third-Hand, or even all unto Ord-Hand become irrelevant as they are all niche and weak levels of detachment, bogus levels of imitations of the truth of the Detachment theory.
== Older Interpretations ==
Just because "text" is in the older interpretations does not mean that it isn't necessarily valid. It is simply qualitatively outdated.
</tabber>
</div>
</div>
References