Discarded Notes (Theist)

The Darkness ---> Indivisability ---> Perfection (A.o.t.A.I.) ---> Culmination --->Theist!
Stick To An Anchor!!!:
-Make sure to check out the Infinity Theology category.
-Make sure to check out the Anchors category as well.
God Might Reveal A Later Truth That Makes Him Go-Negative?:
-WE can't know all that is or what God has done or what all His motiations are...
-That being said, the concept of A-Ideal definitely exists, always will exist at least in potential, and can never Go-Negative.
-Aim of the A-Ideal also answers this question: God must be the A-Ideal, for all else is imperfect copies of A-Ideal, and thus He will ever only need Himself and isn't going anywhere or changing.
-We've already established that God is the A-Ideal in order to beat The Darkness, and thus God will only ever truly need Himself for anything.
-
-What's the point of being open to all things if you can't have any of it?
-There are multiple existential needs and multiple arguments from God that can be used against them.
-I'm not saying it can't be done, God could totally change things to make Himself irrelevent or something else can fight The Darkness; but we should operate on prinpl and assume the worst, The Darkness robs us of everything unless The Supreme is there to defeat it.
>Assume the worst, The Supreme alone can defeat the Darkness, out of principle.
>
Question: Is Wandering From God A Real Threat?:
-Without God we can have nothing else.
-My years in the Darkness proves this.
-You can't pove that it never happens.
-There was a time when I didn't know this stuf, it's at least possible for me to forget some of it and need to redo it otherwise.
-
-Everything else is imperfect variants of the A-Ideal. One more reason we can know that The Supreme would want to be the A-Ideal!
-
-What if God creates a scenario where He is irrelevant? So what, technically as A-Ideal, God exists as all scenariors already active anyway?
-As long as The Supree exits, Solus Deus, Arbiter of Existence.
-Fear robs us of a without God. That is why Theist specifically.
== List Of Reasons Each TTB Fails: ==
-You turn from Creator because it is only about half of existence and does not connect with objects close to Destroyer.
-You turn from Theist because it is only about one Object and its not easy trusting God.
-Adept is the logical alternative. God is a single Object, and Creator a single concept, both of which could turn out to somehow be a negative in the future.
-Adept is truly about all things and is itself not a single object/concept. 
>Be Adept and specialize in Theist to give yourself an idenitty.
-
== Choose A Fucking Anchor Already!: ==
>Widest-Net, which translate into the question of which TTB has the most connectivity. Theist/Adept doesn't suffer from Only-Half, although Creator TTB does.
>Knowldge of either TTB is important but is a secondary question. We can know some things about God (Ind., etc.) and the Creator variant in your head can also be valid (but anything is possible...).
>You can waste away your entir elife going through all the quesitons. Just pick one already!
>Stop switching back and forth between connectivity and certainty! Neither Creator nor Theist can be known in their entirety!
>
*There must be a 'central' variant of Creator or else there is something that doesn't exist. And you can never be totally sure you know it!
>What's the point of knowing your TTB fully if it blocks you from knowing all of A-Infinity!?
>Historically, those are the 3 things that trouble me most when choosing a TTB: connectivity, certainty and trust.
>
== Keeping Up To Date on God: ==
-The reason we should be Theist is because without God there is no knowledge or certainty, and so we must keep up to date on what we know of God to maintain this. Without God, the Darkness guarantees there is nothing else! 
-Our knowledge of God does undergo revolutionary changes from time to time. Ind. was only realized just a few years ago! 
-
-God can indeed do anything, but for now, The Darkness is a thing and so we must be Theist to stay up to date on knowledge of God or risk losing our certainty of anything or everything.
-What's the point of being open to all things if you can't have any of it?
-
== Concept, Not A Person: ==
-When your Theist, you worry that disaster means God is displease at you not being Creator TTB or something else.
-And yet... when you're Creator TTB, you worry that God wants Theist.
-It's a Sisyphus Cycle, dumb ass.
-
== Which Is The TTB Of Everything?: ==
-Only-Half = The trick of Only-Half is what steals Everything from Creator and gives it to Theist. Creator/Existence TTB struggles to connect with things closer to destroyer or finite parts. Theist connects with everything immediatey, especially with the Natural Names.
>Thanks to Ony-Half, it is Theist that is the TTB of Everything!
>Theist does not suffer from Only-Half because it is apparent that being about God allws you to just objectively be about other things as they without ramming them into a dichotomy or scheme.
-The Endless-Questions don't affect this because we know the Supreme-Exists and that anything else is a copy of a portion of God, so studying anything always amounts to studying God anyway.
-While Creator claims to be the TTB of Everything, thanks to Only-Half it is actually Theist that is the TTB of Everything.
-
=== Overcoming the Endless-Questions: ===
-You need to stick to a single point of truth and use it as the Anchor. In the Sea of Infinity, nothing is without exception somehow. But since the obvious purpose of infinity is to be about all things, I would stick to Connectivity and the question of which is the TTB of Everything as your point of anchorage.
-
== God or Everything: Risk of Losing Everything: ==
-If the whole point behind infinity is to possess access to all objects, then surprisingly it is Creator that is at most risk of failing that objective. 
-Thanks to The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster, and if anything is possible, it is possible that s Creator we could wander from God and lose protection from those threats. But not as Theist which is principally only about the sole object of the Supreme.
-Nothing, no other truth or solution, can be trusted without knowing God first. He is the First-Thing. Only by having God can we have all things, ala The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster. If Creator introduces risk of losing that, than it actually fails at being the TTB of Everything. 
--Only-Half = The trick of Only-Half is what steals Everything from Creator and gives it to Theist. Creator/Existence TTB struggles to connect with things closer to destroyer or finite parts. Theist connects with everything immediatey, especially with the Natural Names.-
== No-Half: ==
-No-Half is Creator's answer to Only-Half and purports that since we cannot know what God exists as exactly or what His mind is, something in God could cause Him to either be untenable as an OOR to all objects or want Him to ban certain objects to us.
-The primary answer to this refutation is to restate that it all comes down to trusting in the Supreme. Whatever God exists as must be the best, and if He has a reason to ban objects to others, it is with good reason.
-Also remember Theist/Adept!
-God is already immediately relatable to all things for the simple reason that He is the Supreme and they only exist because He allows it. That alone is a proven connection with all objects.
-
-Creator TTB is dedicated to A-Infinity, so arguing that 'existence' might exist in a way to block some objects is patently false. Actualized existence might but potential existence is alreay about all things because that's how its definition works.
-You can never know the Mind of God, therefore you can never be certain there are objects you would be denied by dedicating yourself to Him alone.
-Just because God is supreme doesn't mean there are objects out there He or His nature wouldnt permit connecting with.
--
-If we have to trust that God is at lest somewhat involved, enough not to let a Cosmic-Trickster happen indefinitely, than it stands to reason He would not let us use false Names for any length of time.
-Trust in God's judgement.
-There was never a guarantee that any Name fits with what God exists as, nor any Aspect fits with how the fullness of existence is (be it in potential, actualized or both). We can only hope to dedicate ourselves to that which is true and good.
-
-The entire topic of No-Half comes down to trusting in God's judgement, that He chooses to exist as that which is best, etc. 
-
-The Name variants may exist in Potential but another truth could prevent the from ever be actualized. In such a case, would they still be useful?
-If anything is possible, it is totally possible for other truths (actualized or potential) to supercede and liit infinite-variation somehow.
-While all things relate to God, that doesn't mean He exists in such a way that dedicating yourself to Him exclusively won't still cut off access to objects. OESDE and all that.
-While it is definitely true that every name must exist in potential in infinite variation,
-As long as you don't know what exactly it is God exists as, you will never know for sure whether or not any particular Name is viable, because you will never be sure some other truth (actualized or potential) changes infinite-variation or keeps a Name forever in potential alone. If a Name is forever trapped in Potential, what use is it?
-
-“Connectivity is the Anchor, Only-Half and No-Half are the performance. Theist can win as long as No-Half dies.  Therefore, the current end game is to destroy No-Half permanently.  The current argument against No-Half is the A-Ideal.” 
=== The A-Ideal Is Inevitable: ===
-Eventually, something of God has to be known. We need it to combat the Darkness.
-The Supreme does exist, He would want to exist as the A-ideal because that alone has The Reasons in their entirety.
-The 'blueprints' of all things exist in the A-Ideal which has no parts. God must be only bout A-Ideal, as per Aim of the A-Ideal.
-Therefore, dedicating yourself to God alone still allows you to have access to all objects, at least their blueprints within God.
-
=== Aim of The A-Ideal Already Proves No-Half False: ===
-The Aim of the A-Ideal is already active. It is obvious to the mind that the Supreme, whatever He exists as, is all He needs to be about simply because He is the Supreme and therefore can do or be anything He would want or need.
-All things exist already within the Supreme's potential.
-Therefore God is about all things at least by being about Himself.
-
=== No-Half Negates Itself: ===
-Literally anything can be subject to No-Half. Creator also suffers from No-Half, regardless of how you define it.
-Creator may be "about all existence both in whole and in parts" but regardless of whichever definition you use for Creator, the sum of existence (be it actualized or potential) may exist in such a way as to block access to some objects should you dedicate yourself to it. The exact same problem No-Half presents to Theist.
-Therefore, No-Half fails as a test of any TTB because it can be applied to all of them. It's just a risk we have to live with it.
-At least with God, He is intelligent and is probably Good. Soe He would choose to exist in a way that is beneficial to us.
-
=== No-Half Refuted: ===
-Let's be honest, The Darkness makes No-Half and similar arguments pointless. We have to be Theist to some degree no matter what. Theist TTB is inevitable.
-We therefore must assume God is good and by extension that He chooses to exist in a way that is healthy and good for us to be about.
-
-Only-Half, The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickser are all natural truths which inexorably lead to the position of Theist. Why would God, if He genuinely cares about us, exist in a way that is unheatlhy for us (ie, limiting our access to objects, ala the point of infinity) if it is the logical conclusion of nature to be about Him and all things through Him?
-
-If being about all things (having access to all things) is good, and God is good and intervenes for us (ala Cosmic-Tricksters Principle) it stands to reason He chooses to exist in a way that lets us have access to all objects even if we dedicate ourselves to Him alone (which is the logical conclusion of Infinity and Only-Half put together).
-
-If God is good and intervening, it makes no sense He would care for us but not exist in a way that allows us to have access to all objects.
-
-Without an interventionist God, the threat of Cosmic-Trickster robs all TTBs of any kind of certainty. If people can be so incredibly evil, aat least some of the greater powers out there probably are too.
-So if we assume God is good and intervening, than it makes no sense to worry that He also chooses to exist in a way or hold to principles that counter what is good for us.
>If the point of infinity is to be about all things, have access to all objects, than God would not want us to not be about all things, through Him or otherwise.
-God could totally choose to exist in any way He wants and always, no matter what, do so in a matter that is good for us.
-Whatever God exists as, He chooses to exist as that.
-If God wants to do good by us, and the logical conclusion of infinity is to be about infinity through God (ala avoid Only-Half) than it makes no sense God would choose to exist in a way that limits access to objects if we dedicate ourselves to Him.
-Put simply, if God is good, and we need to be about Him to have access to all infinity (the logical conslusion of infinity and Only-Half) than it makes no sense for God to exist in a way that limits access to objects.
*Also, God is already immediately connected to all things simply by wont of being the Supreme. He already exists in a way that gaurantees access to all objects!
-
*Remember the A-Ideal argument.
-God could exist in a way that by being about Him alone limits access to objects. But the same could be said for existence in general.
>There is no way to know for sure which concept or object(s) you are dedicating yourself will or wont do this.
-
=== No-Half Counts Against Creator Too: ===
-The problem with No-Half is that it can be used gainst Creator as well. The fullness of existence could exist in such a way as to make connection with some objects impossible. There's no way to tell for us mere mortals. Ergo, it is a useless test, for any TTB cannot pass it in the strictest terms.
-The Supreme right now is capable of anything, which means a copy of everything already exists within His potential. To ban the study of any object would mean to ban a portion of Himself right now.
-In order to combat The Darkness, we must trust that God will allow us to study all of Him eventually or else that unknown element will cast doubt and allow The Darkness to spread.
-The idea of God banning masses of Names from us doesn't make sense because if Connectivity is what we need, why deny it to us if He is an Actively Good deity?
-Even if you use a Name and later God bands it for whatever reson, you still spent time in dedication to the right TTB. And knowing infinity, there are an infinite number of varient Names to use as well.
-Remember that the fullness of existence could later be revealed to be prevent access to certain objects as well. OESDE.
-Remember the A-Ideal!
-
=== Aim of the A-Ideal Kills No-Half: ===
-The Supreme would want to be the A-Ideal and would be all about the A-Ideal for that would be all that He would need to be about.
-The A-Ideal is, of course, just one "part" with no separation.
-All things exist within some portion of the A-Ideal, in "blueprint" form as it were.
-The A-Ideal alone would have all The Reasons to be anything at all.
-Because the A-Ideal has no parts, you are either all about It or not.
-Ergo, God is about all things by being only about the one part of the A-Ideal.
-
=== Infinite-Variation Kills No-Half: ===
-Even if God did dislike a particular Name or class of Names, for whatever reason, there would still be an infinite list of variations of that Name that He would like, OESDE.
-Ergo, there must be a variation of each and every Name that God does like OESDE!
-
*It's important to remember that within infinity, each Name is also a Name(s), a class of objects onto itself.
-
=== Infinite-Variations Regardless Of Any Other Truths ===
-Regardless of what other actualized truths are out there (or in potential), the fact is that there must be an infinite number of variations of any Name that are somehow still viable (even if only in Potential) OESDE.
-What is and is not Actualized is ultimately up to God, but in Potential all Names exist and are viable always (some version of them).
-Therefore, things like Unknowability do not affect No-Half or the arguments against it!
-
-It really comes down to this, is the Name you are using viable in the eyes of God? Does He want it? Infinite-Variation says yes.
-Even if you're using the wrong variant, your still spending time trying to work towards the right one.
-All effort spent in the Name of God is never wasted as it means we are at least trying to work ever closer to Him.
-
-The Almighty power of The Supreme guarantees that any Name must have a variant at least in Potential despite any other truths out there. 
-
=== Shouldn't This Count To Creator As Well?: ===
-How do we know Existence/A-Infinity doesn't exist in such a way as to negate any particular Aspect?
-
=== All Names Already Are A Part Of God By Being In His Potential: ===
-All Names are already a part of God, they exist wtihin His potential as the Supreme, if nothing else.
-This is obvious to the mind!
-
-As long as we don't know for sure what the Supreme exists as, there will always be doubt between any particular Name and God.
-
-We know all conepts exist within God already because they existi n His potential, and we know God is only about Himself because that is all He needs to be about.
-
=== Why Infinite-Variation Works: ===
-No matter what God exists as, no matter what His mind is, no matter what other truths are out there, there must always be a variation of any Name that is acceptable to God and that He would want.
>Therefore, following any Name means it or some close variant must be acceptable to God.
-But what if there's some other great truth out there that negates or changes Infinite-Variatio somehow? Keeps all variants of a Name stuck in potential?
>There would still have to be variants of that Name that somehow escaped that truth OESDE.
-At the end of the day, killing No-Half really means proving that all Names (some variants of them at least) are wanted by God. Nothing else really matters for purposes of Connectivity beyond that.
*Creator doesn't work, Only-Half is a thing.
*The idea of an infinite list of things against any Name is true but only to a point: potential reality is never set in stone but actualized reality is, whatever way things exist as rightnow, there is a variant of every Name that God would want.
-
=== Goodness of God Argument Against No-Half: ===
-If the purpose of infinity is to be about all things, at some point we just need to trust that God is both good and competent and so He lets us pursue other objects even if we dedicate ourselves to Him alone. Otherwise, if we can't trust Him with that, can He be trusted at all?
-
=== Totality of Connectivity: ===
-What we are aiming for here is totality of connectivity or total Connectivity. Access to all objets.
-If all objects are based off of concepts/Names within God (which we know exist at least within His potential or capacity to cause or create) then as long as we have all Names, we have achieved total connecitivity. No-Half is dead and Theist wins out over Creator TTB!
-Infinite-Variation gaurantees that however God may exist as, there must be a variant of any and all Names that He would find wantable. Ergo, all Names are at least somehow valid in God's eyes.
-Other truths out there get factored into Infinite-Variation. It must be possible for a varaint of any Name to be desirable to God despite however God exists as or any other truth sout there. OESDE.
-You could also take this a step further and say there ust be a variant of every Name out there that God want to share with us?
-We already know that Go connects to all things simply by want of Him being the Supreme and thus in charge of all other objects. If something in Him causes disconnect between any other onject and God or someow ho follows Him, there must be an infinite number of variants of that Name that somehow get passed that. OESDE.
-
=== Must We Know All Of God?: ===
-No, because infinite-Variation says there must be an infinite list of variant Names of any Name which are acceptable to God. So regardless of what is actualized now or will be, there will always be an infinite number of Name variants that are wanted by God.
-It must be possible or else God isn't Almighty.
-Whatever is the truth, actualized or otherwise, there must be acceptable Variants despite it. We know there must be or else God isn't Almighty (because of OESDE).
-
=== Cosmic-Trickster Makes No-Half Pointless: ===
-We need to rely on the Supreme alone to protect us from Cosmic-Trickster and ensure we can connect honestly with other objects. Therefore, if God allows Himself or anything associated with Him to block access... that doesn't make much sense.
-Dedicating ourselves to God is inevitable, ala The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster, so if dedicating ourselves to God limits access, we're f*cked. Of course, none of that makes any sense?
-Things like The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster make the Supreme the only thing we can reliably dedicate ourselves too. So we don't really have a choice if it turns out dedication to God limits access to some objects?!
-Foundational-Truths requires us to dedicate ourselves to God because we need to stay up to date on Him.
-
=== Why Not Include other OORs Just In Case? ===
-If God exists in a certain way that limits access to some objects, He chose to exist that way because He can do that, He's the Supreme.
-If God chose to limit access to certain objects, there's probably a good reason for that.
-There's also the issue of no man being able to serve two masters. Eventually, one OOR or TTB identity would have to become dominate.
-Also, if you choose Creator TTB, you bring Only-Half into the mix!
-If you start including other OORs, you're on the road to Creator TTB, which ends in Only-Half.
-
-
=== Cosmic-Trickster Combined With The Darkness Kills No-Half: ===
-If The Darkness forces us to rely solely on God, and Cosmic-Trickster means we need God for connectivity, than why would God allow No-Half to be a thing if He is good?
-The idea is that The Darkness shows that God designed reality so we need to depend on Him. If Cosmic-Trickster is a valid principle, why would God not ensure He exists to provide full connectivity then?
-Cosmic-Trickster proves God ensure connectivity, but for this to cinch shut we need to show that God wants us to be Theist specifically. The Darkness does that.
-These two principles have to be used together to kill No-Half. One to show that God ensures connectivity and the other to prove that God wants us to be Theist specifically.
-The Darkness proves God wants us to be Theist specifically because out of all the potential evil out there, the only thing we can know for sure is the cure against it is the Supreme Himself. It's intent perceived from design.
-
=== A Perfect-Being Must Allow Total Connectivity: ===
-For God to protect us from The Darkness in its infinite threates, He must be completely perfect by Himself.
-A perfect being must be capable of all things by Himself. Ergo, God alone must be usable, both to Himself and to others, for purposes of connecting with anything and everything. Or else God can't do something which makes Him imperfect.
-God could choose to exist in a way that is imperfect but that opens the door to The Darkness.
-Whatever The Supreme exists as, He exists as the Perfect-Being, otherwise He couldn't beat The Darkness.
*Remember that Creator TTB is broken by Only-Half and does not work. Otherwise, my projects would be off the ground by now.
-
=== No-Half Applies To Any TBB: Cancels Itself: ===
-Can Existence/A-Infinity exist in such a way as to make access to some objects impossible? EVen if only included in our TTB? Of course, anything is possible! Can we prove that it doesn't... No, of course not.
-Somehow, No-Half applies to any and all TTBs. But at least with Theist, your OOR is intelligent, chooses what to exist as, nd is supposed to be Good. So He probably actively helps us to connect. You don't have that with primitive Creator TTB.
-
=== Why God Must Be A-Ideal Actualized: ===
-If God doesn't exist as the best in potential, He may be susceptible to The Darkness!
-
=== Infinite-Variation Does Work: ===
-There must be an infinte number of other truths out there that somehow go against or change IV. But that doesn't change the fact that each Name must have variants that God would want. Which means pursuing any Name or concept is just questionof getting the right variant.
-For every possible some total of actualized truths out there, there must be a Name varient that God still wants!
-There must be a variant of every Name that denotes God somehow (so it falls under the purview of Theist), OESDE and which God doesn't deny!
*All things relate to God already simply by Him being The Creator or The Supreme. They denote some portion of His potential. We just need to know there are variants of each Name that can get past any "problems" thereotically inherent in how God has chosen to exist as.
-
-
=== Behavioral-Argument Against No-Half: ===
-God will direct through the object of Himself or direct to another. 
-This is because of the Goodness of God.
-And Cosmic-Trickster, etc.
-Living God vs Dead God - The Supreme is alive and active, while A-Infinity/Existence is a conglomerate of objects and has no unified will or even exists actualized all-together. This is important because it shows that God is the Agent of Connectivity. 
-Creator will try to argue "why not just be Creator?" but Creator is already proven to suffer from Only-Half, and existence/A-Infinity is lifeless and will not help you (dead god) unlike Theist which keeps your mind's eye on God who here is the Agent of Connectivity. 
-The Mind of God cannot be known, so Creator cannot argue from that against the Behavioral-Argument.
-If God doesn't allow connectivity with an object, we must trust He has His reasons. 
-
=== Can U Connect With A (Hypothetical) Unrelated Object?: ===
-Does the Behavioral-Argument allows you to connect with something that is not connected to God or have its 'Blueprint' within God?
>Trust in God's goodness, if He can be trusted for Cosmic-Trickster (if He is involved) He will provide a way.
>
-
=== Agent Of Connectivity: ===
-God will allow for us to have a path forward in connecting with an object in the unlikely event that He chooses to exist in a way that is unrelated to something things.
-
=== Counter To Behavioral-Argument?: ===
-If God might lead us to other OORs if He won't connect us to a object, why then have I spent so many years wandering in the Shifting?
>Training.
-
=== Counter To Agent of Connectivity Argument?: ===
-If anything is possible, the need for protection from Cosmic-Trickster may one day end. God could bring us into a phase where we do not, and should not, rely on Him alone for connectivity. Anything is possible, after all.
>Anything is possible, but we must choose a TTB of most likelihood. Even Creator could prove to be wrong if being all-inclusive is shown to be negative somehow. The point is that the Supreme alone can be known beyond any doubt to be the thing that is most important, so to stay up to date on Him, stay Theist and rest assured in your connectivity.
>No TTB is immune to Whataboutism, even Creator can face some uncomfortable hypothetical scenarios.
-
=== No Flaws Argument: ===
-All Names exist in God's potential, that is, they exist in God's capacity to be or make anything.
-God has no flaws. That is, there are no parts of God that are anything less than perfect.
-If God is flawed, The Darkness returns!
-God is all about Himself as per the Aim of the A-Ideal.
-Therefore, God must be open to all parts of His capacity or else there is something that is within God that is imperfect or unnecessary!
-
=== Trust In God's Judgement Argument: ===
-We don't really have a choice, we have to trust in God's judgement no matter what. Even if God (for whatever reason) did exist in a way to limit some connectivity,
God's Capacity Argument:
-All Names exist in God's potential or His capacity to be or do anything.
-As such, they do exist as part of God and are potentials which we can seek to actualized in our lives even if imperfectly.
-
=== Any Name Explores God's Capacity, No Matter What: ===
-Even A False Name Is Still Of God.
-Even if a Name that was important to you later is revealed to be of less than wanted status by God, that has still taught you something about Him.
-You've still managed to explore a portion of God's capacity if nothing else!
-You can at least trust that any Name, any Name at all, is still of God somehow, and any time spent using it will always yield something about God. Even if later you must discontinue it.
-Even if God asks you to forego a Name, surely given enough time there will be a Name that you can use that covers that same portion of God's capacity and substance?!
>There must be an infinite number of Names, with an infinite number of them open to us by God. OESDE.
-
=== Perfection-Argument + No-Half4Existence: ===
-Aim of the A-Ideal dictats that The Supreme is only about Himself for that is all He needs to be about.
>How can we be sure some other truth out there doesn't contradict or change this? Because we know this is already true: if God cannot fulfil some function for Himself or others, He is therefore lacking. It is obvious to the mind.
-The Supreme would only be about Himself and would want us to be about Himself too (this is the basis for protection against Cosmic-Trickster).
-Therefore, He would provide connectivity to us, because He wants us to be about Himself.
>Why Can't I Use God As A Chair? - This infamous argument is flawed because it ignores the caveat of our existence within this created, mortal universe - God has clearly limited us and His presence to us in this realm of ours. However, as per AotA, He would still want us to look to Him primarily.
-Why not just be Creator? = Because with Theist we have AotA, but with Creator we don't. It is totally possible that Existence, actualized or otherwise, could exist in a way to limit access to some objects. As Creator, you would need to include Existence and therefore find your connectivity gimped.
-
*Even if you don' want to get into the psychology of God's Mind and all that endless questioning, the fact remains that a Perfect-Being would still on Its own be sufficient for all things.
>How much access to Himself we get is up to Him, but it is obvious we are already dependent on God for that. There's no changing that. The point is that we can show that God doesn't exist with any internal-blockers to connectivity.
-
=== How Can We Be Sure A Supreme-Being Would Choose To Be A Perfect-Being?: ===
-There are an infinite number of reasons to be anything in potential, but only the concept of a Perfect-Being would have all of them, because 1.) Only a Perfect-Being must have all reasons or be lacking and 2.) Because a Perfect-Being has all abilities or features, everything else is essentially an incomplete copy of it. 
-Also, isn't being Supreme automatically being Perfect? If you can do anything, which is what makes you Supreme, doesn't that defacto make you perfect? 
-Remember, a Perfect-Being would lack nothing, so It alone would have all the reasons to be something. 
-To be perfect is to lack nothing, a Supreme-Being would require all powers to be Supreme, therefore to be one is automatically to be the other. 
-
=== Concept of God Does Exist: ===
-The A-Ideal exists in the world of potential, ad It alone is perfection and connects with all things (fulfilling Adept at least!).
-
=== Resting on Your Laurels: ===
-It's not enough to be Creator and step back from God. Eventually, you start to wander.
-The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster are never far away.
-
-
=== Why A Supreme-Being Must Be A Perfect-Being: ===
-If He is imperfect, this opens the door to The Darkness!
-
=== A-Ideal Proves Supreme-Being Must Be Perfect-Being: ===
-Everything in existence is either the A-Ideal or an incomplete copy of the A-Ideal.
-Whatever it is that God would use to make a decision on what to be, that thing can only find fulfilment in the A-Ideal, because there are an infinite number of reasons for anything and only the A-Ideal has all of them.
-To be A-Ideal is to be perfect, thus kickstarting Aim of the A-Ideal.
-
-
=== A Supreme-Being Must Also Be A Perfect-Being, Here's Why: ===
>To be Supreme means to be capable of anything and everything.
>There must be a Supreme-Being or we are all screwed (The Darkness, Cosmic-Trickster, etc.).
>It is obvious to mind that to be Perfect means to lack nothing, ergo, a being who is imperfect will be lacking something, and thus this will entail not being able to do or be something, wich means a lack of ability.
-The concepts of perfection and supremacy within metaphysics are therefore hand-in-hand with one another.
>Imperfection = Inability
>
=== Why Take The Risk of A Specific TTB?: ===
>Don't kid yourself, Creator entails some risk too!
-
=== But Human Logic Is Fallible?: ===
>This goes back to Cosmic-Trickster.
-
=== Uncompromising-Truth: ===
-How can we be sure there isn't some other Great Truth out there, actualized, which opposes AotA? Because as long as AotA is true, we know that no opposite truth can be true as well. Make sense?
>
=== Why Anything Capable Of Anything Would Be Perfect: ===
>The risk of not being capable of all things, of something unknown, applies to any finite being. Ergo, in theory, if anyone had the chance for godlike power, they would immediately choose to be Supreme for no other reason than The Darkness itself, which represents infinite unknown dangers.
-
=== Adepthood as Backup: ===
-Adept doesn't have No-Half or Only-Half! Full connectivity! 
-Theist does exist, at least the idea of the A-Ideal exists!
-
=== Adepthood Resurrected: ===
-Adepthood (Theist/Adept) is not the same as Creator, it doesn't suffer from Only-Half!
-It's true that Theist is your favorite Order, but you can totally be open to using and being about all of them.
-If Connectivity is the Anchor, Adept wins out over both Creator and Theist alone! (technically).
-
=== Theist/Adept Is Really Just About Theist: ===
-As Theist/Adept, you'll build all your most important stuff up as Theist?
>Yes, but even as Creator, you'll probably have a favorite Aspect that dominates your most important stuff. It's human tribal instinct to pick one as your favorite and stick to that.
>Doesn't change the fact that Adept has All-Half (and not No-Half) and that's what you are teaching, just from the perspective of a Theist Adept!
-
=== Doesn't Unknowability of Theist Introduce Doubt Into Theist/Adept?: ===
-We need a Supreme, there must be an Almighty-Being, or else we have no protection from The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster!
-
=== But Isn't Most Of Your Primary Stuff All Going To Be Theist!?: ===
-As Theist/Adept, most of your primary stuff will be Theist, but will always be presented alongside other Orders which is how the Adept system works. Theist's are your flagship Order for the purpose of Identity, but even Theists will always be presented alongside the other Adept Orders.
-As Adept, you will inevitably pick one Order as your primary Order. That Order will always suffer from uncertainty of something.
-
=== Protected-Knowledge Kills No-Half: ===
-If we can't trust the Supreme to make sure most of what we know of Him is incorrect or even right at all, than there's no chance He'll protect us from Cosmic-Trickster.
-And once you realize the probability of a Cosmic-Trickster, it interferes with all TTBs without the Supreme to keep it at bay.
-
=== Connecting Things To God: ===
-Connectivity is about having enough intermederries (ie, Names) and having them because of your TTB.
>Connectivity is meant to operate as a two-teir system of your TTB and its intermederries. In the case of Theist, these are your Names.
-If the Holy Names come cross as too silly, try using simpler Names, Names which are basically just concepts.
-All Names teach you about God, even the false ones.
-Existing On = As long as something exists, it effectively exists 'on' God Himself. All knowledge is facts of existence.
-
==== Chemistry Is Key In Material Realm: ====
>Chemistry invokes the mystery of existence and why things exist as they do.
>All Science is really just variations of chemistry.
>Chemistry is elements which originated from the Big Bang which is a direct act of God. At least the first Big Bang out there was His, sans the creation of lesser-creators out there.
-Ergo, the study of the elements always relates to God.
-
==== Things Of: ====
-Connectivity works by way of "things of," you have select things out there that are of your chosen TTB and you use them to interface with eveything else.
-For instance, your Names like Knowledge, Creator, Math, Chemistry; you make yourself about these things and interact with everything else through them.
-EAch of these things is 'of' God and you are interested in them because you are dedicated to God.
-
==== Intremederries You Have Because Of Your Dedication to God: ====
-The same as the last argument, it's about having things you can be about which connect with everything else. But you have these intermederries only because of your dedication to God.
-Intermederries like Math, Chemistry, Truth, Knowledge, Liberty, etc.
-You need to develop your own list of Name (whcih is what theset intermederries are).
-
==== Connectivity-Issues Means You've Wandered Away From your Intermederries: ====
-Ditto.
-
=== No True Opponent = Connectivity: ===
-Creator simply cannot connect with things closer to Destroyer because that's the point of Destroyer, to be the total antithesis to Creator.
-But Theist has distintiveness in another way, by being one Object against all others. Except that Object has the blueprints for all other objects within It!
-This is why Theist has more connectivity than Creator, becaue there are some things Creator simply cannot be about by itself, while Theist has access to all things. That's the very concept of connectivity itself.
-
=== Protected-Knowledge Does Indeed Kill No-Half: ===
-All things connect to God via Supremacy barring He decides otherwise. Ergo, we know God already exists in such a way that He connected with all things.
-The Darkness guarantees we will always need to be about Him. 
>We must trust He won't leave us to the Darkness.
-
=== Antithesis: ===
-Creator cannot connect with things closer to Destroyer without suffering cognitive dissonance. Theist is built to be about all things, but Creator is built from the start to be only about things closer to Creator!
-The principle of Antithesis in Infinity Theology is not the same as Connectivity-Issues. CI is a general issue with Intermederries. Antithesis implies that the TTB in question is structurally designed not to connected with or 'be about' a certain class of other objects. 
>Ie, Creator TTB is not meant to be about things closer to Destroyer.
-
-You Should'nt Have To "Find The Creator In It," Your TTB Should Already Have It.
-Theist does need to find the 'creator' in things closer to Destroyer, it can jsut be about the object as it conceptually is, because all things are found in God and are equally found in God.
-This is what leads to Antithesis or Only-Half.
-Creator needs to reconnect everything back its specific side of existence, but Theist can be about any object as it exists without having to drag it to any side of existence. Thus, Theist has more connectivity.
-Creator needs to jam everything into the Creator/Destroyer dichotomy, but Theist can just be about things as they are!
-
=== Connectivity Means Being About Objects As They Exist On Their Own: ===
-You Should'nt Have To "Find The Creator In It," Your TTB Should Already Have It.
-Theist does need to find the 'creator' in things closer to Destroyer, it can jsut be about the object as it conceptually is, because all things are found in God and are equally found in God.
-This is what leads to Antithesis or Only-Half.
-Creator needs to reconnect everything back its specific side of existence, but Theist can be about any object as it exists without having to drag it to any side of existence. Thus, Theist has more connectivity.
-Creator needs to jam everything into the Creator/Destroyer dichotomy, but Theist can just be about things as they are!
-
=== Connectivity = Color White: ===
-Theist is the Color White, all concepts and all dichotomies.
-Creator is only one dichotomy and must jam everything else into itself to function, but this limits connecitivty in practice.
-The simple reason Theist is best at connectivity is that it can take on any object as that object exists by itself and not by ramming it into some predetermined dichotomy or scheme.
-
=== Direct-Experience: ===
-Aspects themselves suffer from only half due to you having to feel like a Creator. So implying that Aspects get you passed Only-Half is false.
-Connectivity is defined by access to objects!
>Even if Creator can overcome Only-Half (via intermediaries, aspects, whatever), the fact that OH exists itself proves that Creator has less connectivity than Theist does! Theist starts out connecting with all objects!
-Direct experience, argumentation has no end.
-Creator has only one concept, Theist has all of them!
-
=== You Can Be Anything As Theist, Cannot Be Some Things As Creator (Demonstrably): ===
-There are demonstrably some things you can't be permanently as Creator, such as the Punisher, but you can as Theist. That's definitive.
-Even with Creator.Destroyer, the emphasis is on Creator. To be something mostly Destroyer will still cause cognitive dissonance eventually.
-Anything beyond this is Argumentation, and there is no end to argumentation!
-if using the thing itself, that TTB, does not yield total connectivity in the field, than to move beyond that is to start adding more parts and rush headlong into the Endless-Arguments.
-Also, we msut trust God to let us have the proper knowledge in this ife to follow Him correctly. So there's that too.
-
=== Updates On God Pretty Much Nails Any Question Of TTB: ===
-If you already need to be about Him and keep close to Him... that's two-thirds the battle right there.
-We need to be about Him, we need to be able to know Him...
-
=== Theist Doesn't Fulfill Point Of Infinity?: ===
-Theist is about God and God's stuff, and studying the absense of God is actually a part of studying God. So, yes, Theist lets you be anything and study anything.
-Any TTB will result in a constant. Point of Infinity and the need for an identity must be balanced against each other.
-The problem with PoI as Anchor is that any TTB is going to be automatially a constant, which means you will always need to be about that in the long run.
-Because the study of anything means studying its absence as well, pretty much any TTB can be about anything, even something beyond or the opposite of itself.
-
-Point of Infinity fails as an Anchor because all TTBs are *somehow* about all other objects, thus fulfilling PoI. Theonly real question is there a way that one is better at this than the rest?
-
=== Updates-on-God Kills No-Half: ===
-If God set things up so we must keep up to date on Him, and Protected-Knowledge is a thing, how does that not kill PK?
-Also, remember that even 'false Names' are still a kind of Name anyway.
-
=== Unknowability Affects All TTBs: ===
-There might be some portion of God that makes Theist not connect with something. There might also be something that limits Creator TTB or makes God want to limit Creator TTB. Who knows?
-The point here is that it is possible for any TTB to turn out to be wrong, either in whole or part.
-But Theist does have an advantage, we must already rely on God for Protected-Knowledge, so it stands to reason He actively guides knowledge of Himself.
-One day, it could turn out that there is a damn good reason being about all objects or even most objects is somehow Negative. It has to be at least poissible, so it might be!?
-
=== Color White Connectivity: ===
-For the Anchor of Connectivity to be fulfilled requires the Color White kind of connectivity.
-Creator can connect with all other objects but suffers from the difficulty of Only-Half. Meanwhile, Theist can connect with anything as that object exists, in and of itself.
-This is the crucial difference that wins Connectivity for Theist over Creator.
-
=== No TTB Is Completely Known: ===
-If anything is possible, any TTB has vast unknown portions to itself. Even the 'blueprint' of any TTB in your head could *somehow* be put the tip of the iceberg, and who knows what else that iceberg is or does!?
-So Unknoability or No-Half (really the same thing) affects all TTBs together.
-Except Theist has Protected-Knowledge.
-
=== Pure-Connectivity: ===
-AKA, Color White Connectivity, being able to be about anything as it exists by itself.
-No preconceived concepts or dichotomies, just that idea alone.
-
=== Connectivity Anchor Boiled Down: Worrying About Other Reasons Out There: ===
-The point of infinity is to posses all of infinity via a TTB. Which one lets you do this better?
-There are no other reasons because all reasons are objects included in this thought experiment.
-Creator lets you have all things but prefers one side over the other. Theist treats all of Infinity equally for all things can be found in God.
-
== Any Other TTB & I Don't Care About God: ==
-!!!!!!
-We need to stay up to date on God!!!
-
== Protected-Knowledge Kills No-Half: ==
-If we can't trust the Supreme to make sure most of what we know of Him is incorrect or even right at all, than there's no chance He'll protect us from Cosmic-Trickster.
-And once you realize the probability of a Cosmic-Trickster, it interferes with all TTBs without the Supreme to keep it at bay.
-
== Creator and Theist Are Not Equal In Connectivity: ==
-Creator likes to portray itself as also being about all things and yet more certain than Theist, but this is not true!
-Creator suffers from Only-Half!
-
=== Adept Is Your TTB: ===
-Adept doesn't have the artificial dichotomy of existence vs non-existence, therefore doesn't suffer from Only-Half.
-Adept therefore has immediacy of all things and is just a simple concept we know exists. Ergo, Adept has All-Half!
-Both Adept and Creator are about existence, but Creator has a sub-definition which hinders its connectivity!
-As Adept you will have something "to be about," which is the use of categorization.
>Creator has categorization too but that is after its inner-dichotomy.
-If the Anchor is Connectivity, Adept is the true TTB of existence and therefore has perfect connectivity.
-However, for purposes of identity, its best to have a chosen Order as your flagship Order; in this case Theist, which fulfills Solus-Deus.
-Remember, the reason not to be Creator is because the inner-dichotomy leads to Only-Half and hinders connecitivy.
-Yes, Creator has the Aspects and they may be able to overcome Only-Half, but why wrestle with a problem when you can skip it entirely by just being Adept?
-Basing all of your primary stuff on Theist is okay as long as you present the other Adepts alongside the Theists.
-Adept allows you to be about God and the rest of A-Infinity at the same time!
>This is true because some of your storie will also be about other Adept Orders!
-
=== Theist Relies on Categorization For Connectivity: ===
-Want to study something that feels 'far from God' as a Theist? Stick it in a category and find the Name that is foundational to that category.
>For instance, study plants in biology with God as the Prime-Mover. Chemistry is a Name and covers practically all of the sciences!
>Study computers with God as the Source of Energy, etc. Study history with God as the Author Of History, or Destiny, etc.
== OOR: ==
-In the face of absolute-infinity, it is obvious to the mind that we must be about all things.
-However, in order to have identity, we require an OOR (Object of Redirection).
-The two candidates are Creator and Theist.
-Creator is invalidated as a proper OOR by Only-Half. 
>As Creator TTB you can study things of Destroyer but you cannot be about them.
-Theist is the better OOR because It has multiple-Names to connect with.
>The A-Ideal guarantees that Theist is only a single object. 
>Even if God actualized turns out to exist as several objects, that is still an object class than be used as an OOR. Creator's flaw isn't a lack of Solidity but a lack of connectivity.
-
=== Relating to Other Objects: ===
-If the purpose of infinity is to be about all things, and we need an OOR, than it stands to reason that the question is which OOR is best at relating to other objects.
-Creator must scale other objects into its Creator/Destroyer dichotomy, but Theist can just approach any object and relate to it as it is.
-Theist is able to objectively just be about other objects. Creator can't.
-Theist can also relate to other objects with multiple Names, while Creator has only Creator.
-
-
=== Us Vs Them Principle: Treating Objects Objectively: ===
-OOR is the trick of having all of infinity but also not having a of it too.
-The Us vs Them need is a genuine one, which is genuiney felt. It's purpose is to allow to treat other objects as they rather than trying to scale them into the same dichotomy over and over again.
-The Us vs Them principle allows us to treat other objects objectively by having a hard break betewen your OOR and its object and everything else. This is proven objectively by personal expeience.
-It helps to treat other objects as they exist on their own rather than trying to see if their on your team or "bring out" the creator in them.
-Creator fails Us vs Them beause its principle is all objects. Everything becomes Creator vs Creator.
-The Us vs Them principle and the Trick of OOR is the balance between being about one thing and having all things.
-It is obvious to the mind that the Us vs Them principle is true across all of infinity, and while it will inevitably have exceptions, these are regional and as a whole infinity is subject to this principle.
-Creator OOR cnnnot treat objects objectively because it has to approach them from the Creator/Destroyer dichotomy. Aspects may mitigate this, but eventually it feels goofy using a concept to explore existence through another concept? There's also Creator's tendency to "bring out the Creator" in an object, thus meaning you treat that object only from that perspective.
-
-Us vs Them also allows you to have a more solid value system and to know what your priorities are.
-
-
=== Studying vs. Being About: ===
-You can study an object but being about it means making it a central part of what you stand for, what you are.
-
=== The Trick of OOR: ===
-The Trick of OOR is recognizing that you can trade primary objects as you exist. If you stand for a TTB/OOR, you have that as your common-denominator. If you want to study something another object, you can't keep that object forever, as you would forever be unable to tody or be about any other object. 
-This is important because it shows that, as Theist OOR, you can study or be about any other object temporarily, and temporarily is the only one that matters. You can't be about any singular object forever, that violates the spirit of infinity.
-
=== Because Of Multiple-Names & Only-Half: ===
-“Theist is the better OOR because it does not suffer from Only-Half and better yet it connects with other objects through multiple Names instead of just one concept.”
-
=== An OOR Is Inevitable: ===
-The need for an OOR is absolute and inevitable, A-Infinity does not allow for us to be about all things at once in a true sense. Infinity in its fullnese is contrdictory.
>One more reason that OOR is The Anchor and not Widest-Net.
>If the purpose of infinity is connectivity, than that is the test for an OOR. Theist has better connectivity as an OOR than Creator does because it has multiple Names with which to connect with other objects!
-To put it another way, Theist is an OOR that consists of all other OORs combined. That is why it is the best OOR. It has all Names.
-Theist gives us everything through multiple Names, but Creator is but one Name and suffers from Only-Half.
-
-The thing that really kills Creator is Only-Half.
-
-It is just obvious to the mind that Theist is a better OOR than Creator is!
-
=== OOR Before Widest-Net: Widest-Net Can't Function Without An OOR: ===
-There can be no Widest-Net without an OOR, not in any functional sense. Therefore, OOR is the Anchor and not Widest-Net.
-
=== Is The Anchor Widest-Net or OOR?: ===
-The problem with Widest-Net is that it does get to the heart of what I need, a single object to be about completely.
-Being able to "trade" objects negates the whole point of having either Creator o Theist. I need a single object to cement myself to, not be able to trade objects whenever I want too. The Widest-Net as Anchor mindset is well intentioned but does not fulfill a person's existential needs. 
-
-
=== One Actualized Object: ===
-Solidity is crucial for a TTB to be an OOR. 
-The object of Theist is either a single object or class of objects. But Creator is all objects, which obliterates Solidity.
-Even though Creator is itself a single object, with its own definition, its connotation makes it spread out over all things, thus ruining Solidity and the ability to be about it against other things.
>When every object is in your Connotation, you have no Solidity. 
-The trick to OOR is both having access to all things but also doing so by being about just one things for the purpose of an identity.
-
== Widest-Net vs OOR: ==
=== Temporarily Being About Any Object: ===
-Remember that all objects correspond to portions of God's potential. You can temporarily be about any object and reroute through that just fine, same as with Creator.
-You cannot be about any object forever as Creator, since that is exclusion of the rest of existence. So Creator and Theist both allow you to temporarily be about any object out there, but you can't stay that forever. No TTB can do that and maintain Widest-Net. 
-
=== OOR Superior To Widest-Net As Anchor: ===
-OOR gets to the heart of what I need faster than does WN.
-Also, Widest-Net just flat out fails as an Anchor since any TTB/OOR has WN. The purpose of the Anchor is to stop the shifting and distinguish one TTB over another, but all TTBs appear to have perfect Connectivity with all things somehow!
-Knowledge, Law, Kingship - all these TTBs also have perfect connectivity with all other objects, each for their own reason, all objects are somehow subject to them. Therefore, they all have perfect Widest-Net and so WN cannot distinguish among them which is best!
-
=== Exclusion Test Refuted: ===
-If passing the Eclusion Test means having all objects in your Connotation, Theist passes that too because Theist is about God and God's Stuff, which is everything.
-Remember that all objects correspond to portions of God's potential. You can temporarily be about any object and reroute through that just fine, same as with Creator.
-The Exclusion Test also fails because of the Endless Questions of the Shifting, since the Exclusion relies on so many assumptions such as the nature of Creator as the Color White, etc.
--
== Widest-Net: Object-Of-Redirection: ==
-Existence is Infinity, and the obvious point of infinity is to be about all things. To do that you need an OOR (Object-of-Redirection). This is why Widest-Net is The Anchor, because the need for Widest-Net leads directly to the idea of an OOR.
-The OOR is needed for identity in the sea of infinity. 
-Creator (whether you consider it one object or a class of variant objects) clearly suffers from Only-Half, thus limiting its ability for connectivity.
-Theist/God is immediately about all things, especially though Names like Perfection or Knowledge!
-
-The argument that Theist can't go on if God doesn't exist in theory can also be applied to Creator. If somehow the object(s) of Creator ceased to exist, you could be Theist just fine but not Creator. That kind of argumentation is bunk. 
-While Creator covers all things, not all thinsg are Creator. Other TTB covers all things like Law or Order or Ruler or whatever. Creator is a specific object in and of itself. 
-The mindset engendered by Creator TTB suffers from ONly-Half, thus invalidating it for purposes of Widest-Net/OOR. 
-Even if God ceased to exist, the potential for an A-Ideal would always remain. (As screwy as that line of thinking is). 
-
=== The Anchor Is OOR Specifically: ===
-Object-Of-Redirection.
-What I need specifically is an OOR.
-The problem with Creator is that it has all objects as its principal objects. But when everything is of your TTB, you lose that sense of Solidifty. A proper OOR must have a strict differentiation between your thing and everything else. Call it the Us vs Them Mindset. 
-
=== Doesn't Creator Have Greater Connotation?: ===
-Doesn't connotation give Wideset-Net to Creator TTB?
>Negative, Theist and Creator are equal in Connotation. Creator is defined as being about al existence and Theist is defined as being about God and God's stuff.
-
=== Diversity of Objects/Reroutes Refuted: ===
-See But Theist Chains You To Object Of God! down below.
-Theist and Creator both have immediacy with all objects, and you can study any object or reroute as Theist since it corresponds with a portion of God.
-All reroutes already exist in God and so you can study the two in tandem, Creator and created, at the same time. Helions and Sol Invictus, for instance.
-You can be about any object and also be about Theist too.
-You can study any object as Theist, since all objects are either God Himself or part of His stuff.
-All objects are also based on portions of God's potential anyway. Studying anything is therefore studying a portion of God de facto.
-In the face of infinity we realize we must study all things, but the only way to do that is to reroute through God who alone connects to all things in an infinite number of ways. Only He is capable of perfect rerouting.
-
=== But Theist Chains You To Object Of God!: ===
-Yes, and Creator TTB chains you to the concept(object) 0f Creator. What's your point?
-Can you exist as anything without the concept of Creator as Creator TTB? Of course not!
-In theory, if you could reourte to stuff separeate from Creator, could you do so as Creator TTB? Of course not!
-No matter which TTB you choose, you need that conceptual object 100% all the time.
-Better to choose Theist which has better redirection since Theist has multiple Names instead of one (better fulfilling Widest-Net).
-Remember, Theist wins Widest-Net by being a better OOR (has multiple Names, unlike Creator which has only one Name for connecting with things).
-
=== OOR Test for Widest-Net: ===
-The test for seeing which TTB is the best for Widest-Net is simply asking which one is a better OOR (object-of-redirection)?
-Creator has only one Name to relate with (The Creator) but Theist has many, including multiple known Natural Names (Perfection, Knowledge, etc.).
-If Creator and Theist/God are thought of as two distinct objects in infinity, which one is obviously better at connecting with other objects?
-
=== Studying A Destroyer-Object vs Being About It: ===
-Creator can study things of Destroyer, but you cannot be about Destroyer and its objects if you are Creator TTB. But you can as Theist TTB.
-Can you imagine if something very close to Destroyer was revealed to be extremely important and you had to make it a central part of you indefinitely? Creator TTB wouldn't function anymore!
-This distinction is important when Creator argues that it can overcome Only-Half.
-
=== What Gives Widest-Net?: ===
-This shouldn't be so complicated. Widest-Net is that which casts the widest net, so is that Theist or Creator?
>Creator suffers from only-half while the Natural Names of Theist make all things immediate (ie, Knowledge, Perfection, Math, etc.).
-Creator has only one Aspect/Name, while Theist has several!
-
=== Unknowability & Theist & Widest-Net: ===
-It is true that knowledge and connectivity go hand-in-hand.
-But it is also true that while it may seem like we fully know the concepts in our head, we actually don't. Any attempt to fully explain or definitively prove that there aren't parts unseen even to what we know in our head have fallen flat.
-Contrary to first appearance, Creator is not certain, not even the concept in your head.
=== All Things Subject: Gauranteed Certainty: ===
-We don't really know what concept are, what is and is not subject to them, or what might be out there and somehow totally evade or fuck with Creator concept somehow.
-We know there is a Supreme and it is obvious to the mind that all is subject to Him by want of Him being the Supreme.
-Ergo, Theist has assured connectivity, while Creator does not.
-
=== One Name Or Many: ===
-Creator has but one Aspect/Name to work with, while Theist works with several.
-
=== Unknown Prevents Creator From 'Owning' All Objects: ===
-Creator TTB may make the argment that Theist only redirects through one objects, while Creator itself claims lal objects through its definition... but how true is that really? Against the backdrop of infinity, with so much we don't know, isn't possible for something to be out there that can *somehow* screw with that? Definitions be damned, essentially.
-The Unknown prevents Creator from claiming all objects, and this coupled with its internal-error of Only-Half gaurantees that Theist wins Widest-Net!
-
=== The Test For Widest-Net Is What Makes You Truly Open To All Things Immediately: ===
>This is obvious to the mind, since we must have one object as our TTB in order to have an identity. It is the next logical step from the idea of Widest-Net.
-
=== Doesn't Theist Bind You to Just One Object?: ===
>Yes, but Creator does the same. Any TTB does that. You can only operate as Creator with creator-centric scenarios. Stuff that is non-Creator or very distant Creator will have connectivity issues with Creator. Creator may have all objects as its Connotation, but it is itself a single object(s).
>All TTBs connect to all other objects through their principal object (Connotation).
>Whether Creator truly covers all things or not, in theory, if there were somethings somehow totally disconnected from existence, Creator could not connect with them at all.
>
== Object-Deleted Argument Refuted: ==
-Even if God chooses to 'delete' Himself, the potential of an A-Ideal will always exist.
-
== Go Negative: ==
-The real Anchor is the test of which TTB can possibly 'go negative.'
>Theist and Creator both have the same 'Marks,' but the real difference is being able to trust which one won't Go Negative. 
-All TTBs are redirecting connectivity through a single object/concept.
-Creator does indeed have multiple objects through which to connect; but it is still possible they could all go negative someday.
-An infinite number of variations of Creator could still be co-opted by a malign power within existence, etc., just to demonstrate one such example.
-Whether one object or many, all things are possible, so it is still possible for Creator to somehow go negative. But Ind. and The Darkness gaurantees that God and Theist must be trusted. Therefore, Theist cannot go negative!
-Even a little risk is still more risk than none at all!
-
=== Creator Is Also Principally About God: ===
-But Creator TTB does not engender a mindset of only being about the one Object we know is true, good and almighty.
-Creator opens the door for other objects. We must assume the worst about human nature and assume people will slide away from God and spend their time being about other objects. Do you want that as your legacy!
-If God were to 'go negative' because He can't be trusted, than all the other objects in existence would be useless as well, because we wouldn't have PK.
=== Other Objects Just-In-Case: ===
-Arguing that something else might be wrong with God and thus make Him unsuitable as a TTB/OOR doesn't work becaue we need God for Foundational-Truths, especialy PK and to defeat The Darkness.
=== What If We Need Something Else Later On: ===
-This is called Future-Uncertain and is answered by God being a perfect OOR.
-You already have all objects as Theist, they just get redirected through the Object of God.
-
=== Doesn't Will Of God Invalidate Go-Negative?: ===
-The argument that God might not want Theist TTB mindset, for whatever reason, does not change the fact that you spend time in service to something we know exists and is Good. 
-As long as God exists and is Good, anything done towards His veneration or service is therefore on a real foundation of truth and goodness. 
-
-There may be a supreme manifestation of all acts of creating, an "Angel of Creating,' who turns out to not like the Creator TTB mindset? It is possible after all... Do you see where this argument goes?
-
-There are an infinite number of potential objections to any and all TTBs. But for us mortals who have limited time, we must decide to be about something we know exists and is good, even if that thing coud later turn out not even to want that TTB in the first place.
-
=== Can't We Appy This Principle To Allthings?: ===
-Being Creator means dedicating yourself to the concept of Creator, by itself, which may or may not be negative.
-Theist as a TTB may be unknown but its Object is known and is good, so redirect through that!
-Theist is already being about all things thanks to Adept.
-Creator ins't about "all things as a whole and individually," it is about all things through itself. If that self can be negative, that's a problem.
-Creator is etymologically addition. WE can't know if that is negative in the bigger picture. It's as simple as that.
-Any TTB can be about 'all things as a whole and individually,' that question is the object of redirection.
-
=== Theist Is A Separate Object From God: ===
-This argument is sophistry: both Theist and Creator are separate objects from their intended object. it's just a risk that has to be taken.
-Questions of the Shifting are endless and infinite, we must content ourselves with choosing an obect that is true and good and go with that.
-
=== Doesn't Creator Reroute Through The Aspects (Portions of God): ===
-While it is technically true that each act of creating does indeed correspond with an Aspect, which itself corrresponds with some portion of God's potential; however, the fullness of Go-Negative obviously demands a bit more than that. 
-All objects are reproductions of portions of God, that stop people from moving away from God as they make themselves about other objects. 
-It is possible to be Creator and be 'diistant' from God mentally and existentially, something which has already been demonstrated. In theory, if God ceased to exist, you could still go on being Creator. Et cetera. 
-You can also be Creator and actively dislike God without losing your TTB. You can actively try to remain distant from the Object of God and still perfectly be a Creator. But not as a Theist. 
-While Creator ultimately harkens back to God, as all TTBs do, it still does not demonstrate that strict reliance on the singular Object that is God. 
-
=== Percentages: ===
-Theist gaurantees 100% dedication to that which is true and good, while Creator must be of a lesser percentage because its full object is A-Infinity. Both have perfect Redirection (Theist/Adept). 
-
=== Object of Redirection: ===
-This is the question about whether Theist or Creator?!
-
=== Will Of God: What If God Decides To Change Himself?: ===
-Something has to be Almighty or The Darkness wins out.
-Also, this is why we have the A-Ideal. Whatever God is, that's all He ever needs.
-The potential for a Supreme, the concept of the A-Ideal, will always be there. 
-
=== Knowing the Mind of God?: ===
-Does our inability to know the mind of God mean He might change Himself in the future? Is this is a serious issue?
-First off, the idea of the A-Ideal will remain forever, even if only in Potential.
-Second off, God is the A-Ideal, so whatever He is now, that's all that He needs.
-Third off, this same argment can be turned around and used against Creator! God could keep changing anything or even everything!
-At the very least, the 'threat' of Mind of God is negated by the reality that the concept of the A-Ideal will always exist, and so something of Theist will always remain.
-
-
=== What If I Struggle To Connect As Theist!?: ===
-Monad (Sum Of Math), Sum Of All Knowledge and The Creator are three names alone that connect with all other objects!
-
Widest-Net:
-Theist allows you to be about everything but through redirection with Object of God.
-An OOR is necessary regardless of what tTB you choose!
-Creator is more than just being 'about existence.' All TTBs are somehow about all of existence, but each redirects through a different object.
-You can "be about all things" in several different ways. Why should Creator be special?
-
=== Isn't Creator Also Principally About God?: ===
-No, Creator TTB is about Creating, wose definition can be widened to include "changes" or "features" to existence. But God isn't the only 'part' of existence. Creator is about all creating, even those beyond the Object of God specifically.
-Therefore, while Creator includes God, Creator TTB itself is separate from God. After all, in theory if God ceased to exist but everything else didn't, you could still be Creator TTB and have stuff to work with. Therefore, Creator TTB is separate from God.
-Remember, Creator/A-Infinity could totally go negative somehow. But not God, and so the TTB your re-direct everything through should be solely based on God, which only Theist can because of its etymology.
-
But At Least Creator Includes God:
-Yes, but your OOR is something other than God, because if God doesn't exist you can still be Creator.
-Creator is about the concept of existence but not in the strict theological sense.
-
Creator Is Separate From God:
-Any TTB can "include" the Object of God somehow. But the idea behind Go-Negative is to base your life on Him.
-Being Creator TTB bases your life on the concept of creating which is a separate object apart from the Object of God. That's the point being made here with Go-Negative.
-Just answer this question, is God the same object as Creator or are they separate? The answer is obvious to the mind.
-God and the concept of creating are two separate objects because if God ceased to exist but everything else remained, you would still have creating and Creator.
-If God were to decide to go full Destroyer, or something like that, would Creator TTB still be based on God? Of course not!
-At the very least, we can never be sure that the Supreme-Being of Ind. is the same as the object/concept of Creator. Therefore, we should not base our life on it!
-
=== Drifting: ===
-Being about all things is good, but it requires an OOR.
-That OOR must be True and Good.
-That is God.
-Theist is only about the object of God, but Creator includes other objects.
-If your life purpose is to teach the object of God as OOR, it stands to reason your chosen TTB should only allow that one object as OOR.
-Creator allows for drifting, and we should assume the worst: that human fallibility will cause people to drift away from God as Creator, thus negating the entire principle of Go-Negative.
-Thus, while any TTB can somehow be about God, it is Theist which fulfills Go-Negative.
-
=== Creator Is Only One Object: ===
-One Description = One Concept = One Object.
-Whatever can be said of Theist failing as an OOR can also be said of Creator, but at least Theist has Ind. and PK!
-If anything is possible, there must be a core Creator concept, and it can be negative!
-And that core Creator concept can go negative and taint all other variations of Creator too!
-
=== Can Creator Concept Go-Negative?: ===
-Time to take the screws to Creator TTB like its so often done to Theist!
-Creator TTB, the concept of Creator, exists apart from God proper.
-There is no way to be certain that Creator, in its most broad definition (being about all things through an emphasis on addition) is not somehow negative outside our section of existence.
-Contrary to what Creator TTB has typically thought in the past, Creator only has one principal objects (foundational object) which is the very concept of creating itself.
--
== Adepts Over Creators As Literary Devices: ==
-It's the literary devices that once and truly win me over, and Adepts are better than Creators from a literary standpoint.
-
== Theist Can't Go Negative: ==
-Only the Supreme specifically can defeat all of The Darness!
-The Darkness, and other Founding-Principles, all require the Supreme specifically!
-
== Marks of the Anchor: ==
-Connectivity = Does the TTB connect with the rest of A-Infinity?
-Certainty = Does the TTB and its object actually exist? Can they be known, at least well enough?
-Connotation = Does the TTB actually have an object? 
>Creator is about all of existence immediately, but so is Theist because Theist is about both God and God's Stuff. 
-Cause = Can the TTB prove negative at some point in the future? 
>Remember, both Creator and Theist are themselves a single object, regardless of how good they are at Connectivity.
>God has to be good, ala Protected-Knowledge, so Theist is least likely to go negative. 
== Just Be 'About All Things': ==
-Having a TTB is specialization, the opposite of just 'being about all things.'
-Any TTB is really redirection through an object. 
-The problem with being about all things is that the fullness of existence is contradictory. 
-
=== Widest-Net: Object-Of-Redirection: ===
-We should be about that which is the best OOR, allowing us to be about all other things through it. Which is God and not the concept of creating!
-Creator suffers from Only-Half!
-
== Creator Is A Single Object: ==
-Creator in the past has masqueraded as being 'about all things' and therefore having all objects as its base, but this is not true. Creator is founded on the concept o creating which is itself a single object. In theory, should the concept of creating or addition ever go negative, that would spell the doom for all of Creator TTB, regardless of it having wider connectivity. 
-All TTBs are really founded on a single, unifying concept and therefore are founded on a single object. Just like Theist. 
-
== Who Can You Trust?: ==
-Creator could prove to have a personification some day. The Personhood argument carries no water.
-Remember that Creator, despite being connected to all objcts, is still itself just one concept, and therefore just one object in and of itself. 
== Adept Is Supreme: ==
-Adept alone as a TTB has all anchors, Certainty, Connotation and Connectivity.
-Theist works better with Adept than does Creator because of only-half. You can ignore the Theist Order to be about another one as Adept but as Creator, Aspects that are too far away from Creator can still having trouble connecting with.
-It's not Creator vs Theist but Creator vs Adept.
-3Cs:
>Certainty (how well is that TTB known, the "Blueprint" in your head)
>Connecitivity (how well does it fulfill Widest-Net)
>Connotation (it's Founding Object(s), does it have any or a lot?)
-With Creator, there is only one paradigm or concept in your life. With Theist/Adept, there are all of them, and all are interchangeable as needed!
-You can't put Destroyer first and be Creator, but you can as Adept!
-
=== Creator Is Not About All Objects: ===
-Creator is about addition and existence in general, but not Destroyer. It suffers from Only-Half which Adept doesn't!
== Certainty & Connectivity: ==
-CC because having a TTB means having (knowing fully) a single object to dedicae yourself to, and through that object connecting with all other objects as well). Thus, having all of A-Infinity via that chosen object!
>
-Certainty is how much do you know the object in question.
>Nothing can be known 100%, not event the ideas/variants in your head. What they are connected to further is also unknown, since all concepts are really approximations founded on other concepts.
>God cannot be distant and inactive even if He is good, otherwise you must fear Cosmic-Trickster.
>We must trust that God guides us to proper knowledge of Him.
>Hope is the only true knowledge, to put it symbolically.
*God allows people to worhip Him in false religions because He knows they will go no farther. I've seen this from personal experience.
>The variant of Creator in your head can always be susceptible to Cosmic-Trickster. Also, there is the issue of not knowing its full ramifications if Actualized, what it connectes to further, etc.
>Your variant of Creator, if actualized, could prove to be somehow negative. You can never be sure.
>The only one who nows for sure what to stand for is God, what knowledge is worthy. So dedicate to Him, and in supporting Him, you support whatever knowledge is worthy championing.
>Remember: the idea in your head and the idea as it stands actualized are not necessarily the same. There's no way you can know for sure that the idea in your head would actually work, either in potential or our actualized reality.
>Yes, you can make changes to the Creator Variant in your head, but after enough changes its going to be something totally different. So you still dedicated your life to something false anyway.
>So in terms of Knowedge as the Anchor; your options are Hope in the Divine (Theist) or the Idea in your Head (Creator).
*Both of the above options allw you to make changes to your TTB as you go along. By-the-by.
>The differnce is that what God champions must be good, while the idea in our head may not be good at all. Why risk dedicating your life to something that might turn out to be a dud, or worse, prove to be an unsalvageable negative in the future!?
>
-Theist has Connectivity through Theist/Adept.
=== Truth About Certainty (Knowledge): ===
-Both the object of Theist and Creator are infinite and mostly unknowable (very unknowable!).
-The actual TTB of Theist and Creator are concepts in your head. You can know those, yes. But the important thing is can you know their objects!
-We can know nothing about the actualized or full potential form of A-Infinity. But we can know some things about A-Ideal definitively, such as His Goodness and Indivisability.
-Therefore, statistically speaking, we can know more about God than infinity.
-Also, we can trust that God leads us to knowledge of Him, unlike with A-Infinity which appears to be lifeless and does no such thing for us.
-Knowledge alone as Anchor is a bit of a tie, with Theist taking a marginal lead. The objects of both TTB s are unfinity and mostly unknown.
-It looks like the role of Anchor flips back to Connectivity. Connectivity and Certainty (Knowledge) are the only two things I've ever really taken seriously as being an Anchor anyway.
-
-A TTB cannot be separated from its object entirely. Should the Fullness of Existence prove impossible to actualize, or to be always negative somehow, than Creator as TTB would be irrepeably damaged, even beyond pick-and-choose.
-Theist/Adept has pick-and-choose as well in the form of the Adept Orders.
=== Connectivity Question: Blueprint In Your Head: ===
-Creator is a TTB about all thing with a specialty on the Fullness of Existence. Theist/Adept is also about all things but with a specialty on the Supreme-Being.
-We cannot be sure, as per Cthulhu-Doubt, that the Fullness or unity of all things is even possible, or that it is even good.
-We know the Supreme exists already as per Ind. and that He must be good as per principles like Protected-Knowledge.
=== TTBs By Themselves Are Useless: ===
-The idea of dedicating yourself to a Creator variant that exists only in your head is dumb.
-First off, you still don't truly know it, even if you have the 'blueprint' in your head, because you can never know for sure how it will actualized in real-life.
-Pick-and-choose can only go so far. What if the fullness of existence, the signature aspect of Creator TTB, turns out to be always negative? What then?
-If our actualized reality makes the fullness of existence forever negative, would it be smart to dedicate yourself to that TTB even if it can be fully held in your head? Of course not!
-REmember that both Creator and Theist/Adept are about all things. They differ only in what their specialties are.
-The specialty of Creator can neither be known to exist for sure or even good, but Theist can.
-Both Creator and Theist TTBs in their "blueprint" form can be known to the human mind! Arguing Creator variants is therefore intellectually dishonest!
-We can't know everything about either object of the two TTBs, but Theist's specialty is known to exist and must be good. It is obvious to the mind that that must be enough.
-
=== Knowledge As Anchor Favors Theist: ===
-We know the object of Theist exists, that It must be good, and that whatever It is or wants is what Theist wants. But the fullness of Actualized Reality or Potential could *somehow* be revealed to make Creator TTB negative everytime. There is no gaurantee there.
-The "blueprints" of both Theist and Creator (variants or not) can be held in your head. Why should Creator be so special?
-Adept is about all things better than Creator is! But it needs Theist to give it some flavor, otherwise it is bland!
-
=== Adept Is Better Than Creator As Knowledge Anchor But Needs Theist For Flavor: ===
-Adept is more knowable than even Creator, since it has no internal sub-concepts, but without Theist to give flavor it is Bland.
-
=== -Adept Is Better Than Creator As Widest-Net But Needs Theist For Flavor: ===
-Adept is about all things better than Creator is! But it needs Theist to give it some flavor, otherwise it is bland!
-
=== Adept Wins Knowledge As Anchor: ===
-Adept is only a single concept, unlike Creator which has a sub-definition. It is therefore easier to know, because there is less of it to be known or uncertain about.
>Adept requires Theist to give it flavor, to rescue it from being Bland. Creator could do that too, but that introduces Only-Half.
-You can be Adept and be other things besides Theist. You've done it with related Ordesr already, like Gaia, Reaper, etc.
-Theist being the cornerstone won't mater so much as long as you involve other Orders as well. Being the favorite Order doesn't mean all your bigget projects must hinge on that!
-If Theist goes negative, whose going to combat The Darkness? Only the Supreme specifically can do that!
-Cthulhu-Doubt further shows how Creator is suspectible to doubt as TTB of Widets-Net but not Adept!
-
=== Dedicate Yourself To Adept Or Creator?: ===
-Nothing has more Connectivity than Adept, which has no Only-Half.
-And nothing is more certain than Adept for it encompasses all things and is a single concept (of Widest-Net) with no sub-divisions.
-
== Adept TTB: ==
-Adept Is The TTB Of Widest-Net.
-Theist is only about one Object, Creator emphasizes one-half of existence over the other, but only Adept TTB is immediately about all objects. Anything and everything is a conept that is also an Adept Order immediately.
>With Creator TTB, you have to re-route things closer to Destroyer in order to make it work, but that makes things feel silly after awhile. Adept doesn't have that.
-Adept has an identity all on its own, that identity is Existence itself. 
-Being Theist/Adept is not just Theist in disguise: you will want to include the other Orders as contrast to Theist. That means you spend time exploring the other Orders!
-Adept has no 'internal emphasis' on anything like Creator TTB does. It is simply about Existence in its entirety and immediately. 
-The TTB of Widest-Net is that which has total immediacy of all objects! Because the point behind Widest-Net is to be about all objects! 
-Creator TTB can claim all objects too, but its hold on one-half of existence is weaker than the other. This is not the case with Adept which has no re-routing. 
>You can tell the different when trying to be about Death or War as Creator or Theist. It's easier to just be about the concept itself as Adept!
-
Proof Adept TTB Has Identity:
-If you have a literary representation of Adept TTB (which would be the Adepts themselves) and you can write stories about them, than the TTB has Identity!
-The Anchor is Widest-Net. Creator suffers from Only-Half (play Fallout New Vegas to be reminded of that). Only-Half proves Creator and Adept aren't the same TTB.
-
== War for Your Specialty: Followup to Adept/Theist: ==
*Both Creator and Theist (Theist/Adep) claim to be about all objects (Widest-Net), the only question now is which "specialty" (Theist or Creator) should you choose in addition to Adept (Adept being about all things).
*The weakness of Creator is Only-Half, the weakness of Theist is Untrust (unknowability). 
-You can never truly know God. Even what little you have figured out can always be changed by something else which is unknown about God. 
-If you know nothing about a specific Object, or ever know, than you have nothing.
-Having 'only-half' (ie, Creator) is better than having nothing at all, which is Theist.
-Creator functions according to different rules. While we cannot know the entirety of A-Infinity, we can know somethings for sure, such as ourselves and our perceptions. That is something. 
-
== Theist / Adepts: ==
-Dedicate yourself to Adept in general, with Theist as your favorite. That way, if God somehow becomes a negative, your life was not wasted, or anyone else's for that matter who has done this.
-Adept is better than Creator because it does not suffer from Only-Half.
-Adepts are about all of A-Infinity, thanks to the paradigms. 
-
=== Dedicate Your Existence To All Objects: Specialize In Theist Because Of The Darkness: ===
-Your life is dedicated to all things as Adept, your specialty should be Theist because of The Darkness.
>Having Creator as your specialty makes no sense because its the same as Adept. It would be like saying your TTB is Adept/Adept. It's complete redundency.
>The whole pint behind Adept as a seconary TTB is in case your primary goes negative. So why have the same TTB twice?
>Even a TTB you know completely in your head can still turn out to be negative int he grand scheme of things, with no hope of changing or adjusting that. Therefore, be about all things, but specialize in Theist because of The Darkness.
>Let everythng be what you base your life on, but with a specialization in Theist ala The Darkness!
>Theist as specialization is inevitable anyway, thanks again because of The Darkness.
>Why 'push past' connectivity as Creator when Adept doesn't suffer from it at all anyway!
>
=== But You Can't Ever Really Know Theist: Only-Half Is Better Than No Whole!: ===
-Cosmic-Trickster kicks in here.
>Without Protected-Knowledge, there is no assurance to anything we think, any of our thoughts could be unimaginable evil and something could simply be keeping us from seeing it as such.
>We must trust that the Supreme provides at least some protection and guides us to knowledge of Him. 
-The Object of the Creator is not some mere object, It is the All-Thing, the Everything, the BTI! You can't just metaphysically dismiss Him like that!
-If the A-Ideal goes negative, nothing can be trusted, therefore no other TTB is possible. They could all be lies, and you could never be sure of anything no matter what.
-Therefore we must trust in Providence. And in doing so, show that the A-Ideal, even though it is only one object, is in fact the most trustworthy of the two options of Theist and Creator.
-
-
=== Proof Adept & Creator Are Two Different TTBs: ===
-To be about things of Destroyer is a stretch for Creator TTB, but not Adept. Adept is truly immediately about everything, while Creator favor one half of existence over the other.
-
=== Being The Most Open: ===
-The TTB of Widest-Net is that which is most open. Adept has no preconceptual dichotomy or any preconceptions at all, thus making it completely open!
-Whatever faults Theist may have in operation is negated by the habit of including other Orders in what you do. At the end of your life, one of them must be right and true. 
-
=== It's Creator Vs. Adept: ===
-Adept wins because it's not tied to a dichotomy concept.
-
=== How to Test Which TTB Is Of Widest-Net: ===
>How do you dtermine which TTB is 'the' TTB of Widest-Net itself.
>The answer is whichever one allows you to be the most things, to be about the most objects. And to do so effortlessly.
>That is Adept, not Creator TTB!
*Adept is short for Adept of Existence and so is etymologically about all of A-Infinity already.
*This isn't rocket science; the TTB with the widest-net and the most even net of objects is the TTB of Widest-Net.
*
=== Etymology: ===
-Adept is short for Adept of Existence, and so Adept TTB is etymologically directly about existence itself. Unlike Creator which is only about one-half of existence (the creating half).
-
=== Being About Fullness of Existence Expressly: ===
-Adept means "Adept of Existence" and so is about all of existence already. Whether with orders or just aspects. 
-Because all things bleed into each other, being about one thing will always somehow lead to everything else eventually anyway.
-Being Widest-Net, however, also means being able to not be about Widest-Net. Curiously.
-
-
=== Adept Has No Connectivity Issues: ===
-Adept is the Vehicle of Widest-Net because it has no connectivity issues. Creator strugles with things of Destroyer, and Theist sometime struggles with non-God stuff. But everything is truly immediately of Adept.
-
=== Adept Is The TTB Of Widest-Net: ===
-Theist/Adept is betterfor Widest-Net because it allows you to take things on as they are, instead of constantly taking them on while connecting them back to another concept like Creator. 
>
-
=== The Test Of Which TTB Is Of Widest-Net Is The Question Of Definitions: ===
-The TTB of Widest-Net is that TTB whose sole definition is to be about ALL existence without ANY notions or conceptual sub-divisions within it.
-Adept is purely just about all of Existence. Creator is about Existence with an internal emphasis on the fullness of existence and creating. 
-You can be Adept and be about Oblivion, the opposite of the fullness of existence. But you can't as Creator! 
-It is totaly possible to be about all of existence or portions of it as some variation of Adept, but the concept of Creator can't accept that. Therefore, Adept alone is simply about Existence while Creator has a conceptual sub-division (fullness of existence).
-
=== Pre-Conceived Notions: The Test For Widest-Net Openness: ===
-It really comes down to Creator vs Adept.
-Creator will always be weighed down by the fact that is is about a pre-conceived notion that it needs. Adept can be about anything at all. There is an Adept Order that corresponds with anything and everything.
-The point of Widest-Net is being open to everything and Adept can do that. It can be anything and relate to anything it wants. Creator can't, because it must have a common denominator of the creator concept. Adept doesn't have a need for that.
-
=== Creator And Adept Are Two Distinct TTBs: ===
-You can be Adept and surround yourself with things of Destroyer and be okay with that. Creator cannot. Creator can stand a few things of Destryer, but not a majority. This has already been proven in experience.
>Further, you cannot be Creator and yet specialize in something that is inherently more Destroyer than Creator. But you can as Adept. 
>Using the military-supernatural wikia as an example is not legit: that's just one thing. Creator cannot stand many or most things around itself being of Destroyer. Therefore, it is Adept that is the true TTB of existence. 
-The fact that Creator needs a qualifier within its concept proves it will forever be subject to Only-Half. 
-
-
=== The TTB of Widest-Net is simply Adept. ===
>Specialize in Theist since that's your favorite!
>The problem with Adept as a standalone TTB is that it doesn't really give an identity.
>If Theist can't stand the loss of the Supreme, then by that same token, Creator can't stand the loss of the concept of addition either!
>
=== Only-Half Is The Anchor: ===
>Having something means being open to it, and not just the part(s) of it that are Creator. All of it, as the thing itself exists.
>If you need to concentrate on the part of it that is most Creator, you are therefore overlooking the other parts, which is against Widest-Net!
>If Only-Half wasn't a legit problem before, it would not have caused you to shift multiple times before when you were Creator TTB.
>This isn't rocket science, being Creator Afield runs into Only-Half. The reason to be the Supreme specifically, from a purely pragmatic standpoint, is for the simple reason of Connectivity and thus being about all things (Widest-Net).
>Only the Supreme is the basis of all things, and thus by being about Him you gain access to all.
>while everything is technically connected to all other things somehow, somethings are doubtless not actualized, or vice versa.
>AS Creator TTB, in theory ou couldn't connect with anything that ws pure Destroyer? And if anything is possible, somehow it is still possible for there to be things which are pure Destroyer out there!?
>To put it another way, any other TTB besides Theist has an opposite, and therefore leads to Onl-Half.
>Therefore, to fulfill Widest-Net, you must be Theist!
>An Adept can be based on anything, therefore they are the TTB of Widest-Net.
>
-Theist/Adept!
=== Isn't Theist/Adept Just Theist As A TTB?: ===
-As long as you involve the other Adept Orders along with Theist in everything you do, than Theist/Adept TTB really is just Adept TTB. An Adept TTB is the truest form of Widest-Net in TTB fashion, even before Creator TTB!
>Creator is only about 50-70% of existence, with things strongly of Destroyer being hard to identify with.
>Theist/Adept might be mostly Theist, but that 10%or so is still everything else. If Theist proves wrong, at least that 10% can inspire others.
>If Creator is proven wrong, you lose everything too.
>No TTB has no risk whatsoever. It's about getting the TTB with the most coverage and least risk.
>The point here is that Theist/Adept covers everything, while Creator only 70%. That's still better, mathamatically speaking.
>At least with Theist/Adept, all of existence is truly covered, unlike with Creator TTB.
>It's rue that Creator/Destroyer covers everything, but that's just one meta-dichotomy. Adep allows you to approach A-Infinity using any dichotomy you want (of whic there are an infinite amount).
>That ten percent of Theist/Adept is infinitely versatile, unlike Creator/Destroyer which has only one dichotomy.
>After all, it could always be proven that another etymoogicl dichotomy is better, right?
>That ten percent of Theist/Adept is still more metaphysical insurance than the whole of Creator/Destroyer.
>If the firt par tof Theist/Adept goes bad, you've still got something to work with. If you dedicate your life to Creator/Destroyer, and Creator goes bad (anything is possible) than you have only Destroyer left? !!!
>
=== Creator/Destroyer Is Only One Dichotomy: ===
>Creator is still only one concept, while Adept is all concepts at once!
>
=== Creator & Adept Have Two Different Definitions (Different TTBs): ===
-Adept is to simply be about existence. Creator is being about existence but with an emphasis on creator and creating.
-Being about Reaper by itself, and being about Reaper in relation to creator is noticeably different!
-We don't know what Actualized reality fully is, Creator/Destroyer dichotomy might not extend to everything even if it does in Potential. Adept is etymologically about everything regardless of any pre-concieved concepts or dichotomies. 
-
=== Creator/Destroyer Can Only Function With One Meta-Dichotomy: ===
-Creator.Destroyer cannot operate with any other conceptual dichotomy in the dominance without feeling weird. Adept (and Theist) does not have that weakness.
-
=== Does Theist/Adept Even Work?: What If Theist Proves To Be A Negative?: ===
-If you include other Adept Orders in the things you do, then yes, Theist/Adept does work as the TTB of Widest-Net.
-Theist will have to be involved in everything, especially everything major, but that doesn't mean you can't also have other Orders as well!
-Include both Theist and Adept in all you do, and you won't have to fear failure when facing death!
-
-As long as you involve the other Adept Orders along with Theist in everything you do, than Theist/Adept TTB really is just Adept TTB. An Adept TTB is the truest form of Widest-Net in TTB fashion, even before Creator TTB!
-
=== Creator Can't Work With Adept: No Creator/Adept TTB Is Possible: ===
-Creator, due to its nature, does not work with Adept but instead seeks to replace it, since Creator claims to be defined as the same. But this leads back to Only-Half!
-
=== Notes: ===
-The problem with Knowledge as the Anchor (knowing all of your TTB) is Cosmic-Trickster.
-The only True Knowledge is Hope:
>Neither Creator nor Theist can truly be known, neither in part or in whole.
>The only real Anchor is Connectivity/Widest-Net.
>All knowledge is predicated on hope (Protected-Knowledge/Cosmic-Trickster).
>
-Connectivity Is Superior To Knowledge as The Anchor:
>What'st he point of completely knowing your TTB if it is small and connected to nothing!
>Congratulations, you have one little things, but are unable to connected with at least half of the rest of infinity!!!
>Is it truly worth it to have just one thing int he face of infinity, or to take your changes with the hidden God who is the only source of Protected-Knowledge anyway?
>What if you base your life on that one Creator variant in your head only to discover later than it always is negative in our actualized A-Infinity?!
>
-Theist can't go negative and God needs to let us study Him, otherwise we lose the Foundational-Truths!?
-
-
=== Being Theist/Adept Leads To Basing Life on Theist Alone?: ===
>Adept works best with a flagship Order, which for me is Theist, but that doesn't mean the other Orders aren't used as well.
>Life-decisions are still made as Adept. And my content involved all Orders. How much content is on the Adept wikia for the other Orders that excludes the Order of Infinity!?
>And I have aliases for the other Orders in use already, thus proving my life is based on more than just the Infinite Order.
>Therefore, being Theist/Adept is still just being Adept, which has greater Connectivity and Certainty than Creator TTB!
>
=== Both Creator & Theist Have Only One Object: ===
-Creator and Theist alike have only one Foundational-Object, which is their concept. If the concepet of Creator ever goe snegative, there's no saving its TTB, regardless of how many objects are in its net.
>Creator's argument against Theist/Adept, that specializaiton will still lead to depending on one object for your legacy, is therefore invalid since the same will still happen with Creator. If you are Creator/ADept, most of your life's works will still be based on a single object that can go negative as well. And this one hasn't been proven necessary via The Darkness.
-If Creator goes negative, you have no built-in fall-back. If Theist goes bad as Thesit/Adept, you can choose from any of the other Adept Orders!
-Creator/Adept doesn't really work because Creator functions much as ADept does and so seeks to replace it rather than work with it like Theist does.
-There are an infinite number of things to ponder when considering which concept to make your TTB, but chief among them (which is obvious to the mind) is safeguarding against your TTB going negative in the face of Infinity.
-Connectivity = how many objects does it connect with?
-Certainty = how well do you know it, the Blueprint in your head?
-Connotation = How secure is its foundational-object or concept?
-Concreteness - Does it have a bacup if its foundational-object goes negative.
-
=== Assuming The Worst: ===
Adept Is Both A Concept & Concept(s):
-Adept is itself a single thing but is also all concept. Dedicating yourself to Adept means all things are what you are about.
-Both Creator and Adept have this, but Creator suffers from Only-Half. Adept doesn't!
-
=== Life Choices & Content: ===
-As Thesit/Adept, you will involve multiple Orders in your content, so that Theist alone is not the cornerstone. Your life will be organized as an Adept, not as Theist alone!
-
=== Theist/Adept Is Objectively More Than Just Theist: ===
-Using the Adepts as literary devices gaurantees your content will involve multiple Orders, not just the Theists!
=== Adept Is Not A Backup: ===
-If you're living for Adept and using multiple Orders in your content and choices, then Adept isn't really a 'backup' now is it?
=== How To Be Truly Adept: ===
-It's easy. Dedicate yourself to multiple Orders, not just Theist!
-Theist can be your flagship, but other Orders like the Naturalists, Muses, etc., will also gaurantee that your life was meant for something positive and not negative.
-Adept allows you to dedicate your life to multiple concepts or 'things' but Creator doesn't.
-
=== Dedicate Yourself To Multiple Orders: ===
-This absolteuly proves you are Adept as TTB!
-And steals the argument from Creator that Theist/Adept is really just Theist anyway.
-
=== Theist/Adept Is Two Objects, Unlike Creator Which Is Just One: ===
-So technically your dedicating yourself to two Objects off the bat, unlike Creator, which increases your protection from your life's work being based on a negative.
-
=== The Key Is Multiple Objects As Your TTB: ===
-You should dedicate yourself to multiple objects, not just one, as well as Adept (Widest-Net) just in case!
-Adept allows for this, but Creator less so.
-
=== Adept Diversifies Your Content Unlike Creator: ===
-Both Theist and Creator are objects, writing as Creator will make all your characters and content be about Creator which itself could go negative someday.
-On the other side, Adept, even as Theist'Adept, means mathamatically that at least some of your content involves other Orders which are based on other objects.
-One way or another, a functioning TTB will result in the bulk of your work being based on some object out there, but with Theist/Adept, at least you have other minor objects sharing the spotlight. This is not the case with Creator TTB.
=== Theist/Muse/Naturalist/Scion/Adept: ===
-Hows this for a real example of what my true TTB. Really allows for me to be about multiple objects against the backdrop of infinite.
-It also helps prove that Theist/Adept is not just the old Theist TTB. The literary device of the Adepts allows for you to dedicate yourself to multiple objects!
-
-
=== -Doesn't the Personhood of Theist Invalidate Theist/Adept?: ===
-Some things about God can be known for sure, such as Ind. and that He exists.
-Theist is inevitable. Because of The Darkness, we must know that God exists and must be able to study Him.
-Also, there is the question of knowing what you are dedicating yourself to. While God cannot be known in His entirety, neither can any concept truly be fully known, including Creator.
-You don't want to reach the end of things and discover that Creator was somehow negative all along as a TTB.
-Convesely, the Supreme must be good, otherwise all is for naught anyway. So why not dedicate yourself to the one thing that matters instead of side-objects which have no guarantee of being good in the long-run.
-Creator TTB only appeas to be more concrete than Theist, when in reality it is not.
-
==== Theist is Inevtable: ====
>This counters the Personhood argument, that we cannot know the will of God and that it makes being Theist feel stupid to follow Him anyway.
-Adept is better than Creator as a TTB, the Only-Half proves this, but Adept requires a flagship Order to work properly.
-Theist can be that flagship Order. Knowing and studying God is universally needed as per The Darkness.
-As for the Personhood counter-argument from creator, we can only trust that God will not issue any orders counter to our needs. That part of reality is inescapable.
-Besides, it is extremely doubtful that God would ever order us to not study Him, especially since The Darkness is a thing He Himself has alllowed to be.
-The Great Hope does nothing against The Darkness. Only the Supreme specifically can completely counter the Darkness.
-The Darkness makes us need Theist no matter what.
-
-
== What If God Has It Out For Us: ==
>Without God and His goodness, eventually we arrive back in The Darkness.
>Remember the good councidences in life, not just the bad ones.
>Without God being good, there is no Protected-Knowledge!!!
>Given how everything is so dependent on God, in inumerable ways, trying to live while ignoring Him is effectively not possible.
>
=== If U Can't Be Sure He's For You, He Might Be Against U?: ===
-Well, all I think then is to say that you should be about the other Adepts more. That way, it wasn't for nothing.
-Of course, not being certain God is good is what leads directly back to The Darkness, but....
-
== Theist Argument W/ Attending Reasons: ==
-A Supreme must exist.
-That Supreme would want to be A-Ideal (All-Reasons). This is necessary to combat the Darkness.
-Supreme alone can fulfill His own TTB (All-Sufficiency), otherwise He has external needs.
-If the human mind can comprehend infinity, it can comprehend what covers it. Especially with metaphysical mechanisms like the A-Ideal. This is Obvious to the Mind.
-The problem with Widest-Net is that it leads to The Grey which in turn leads to The Darkness. By ignoring God, He fades to the background, leaving you vulnerable.
-Another problem with Creator/Widest-Net/Just In Case is Future-Insurmountable.
-
*Creator makes me not care about things of God. I've seen it happen too many times.
*Time to inject some common sense, Creator TTB makes you care about a concept more than the Supreme!
*Creator TTB is etymologically about the concept of Creator and not the Supreme per se.
*
== Trying To Live Without God: ==
>Is not possible. The Foundational-Truths make Him a necessity.
>Not just philosophically or existenionally, but in many other respects as well.
>If you don't believe God is good, what will you do when faced with The Darkness again?
>If God is evil, then nothing we do will matter, for He will let all things fade eventually. God's goodness is necessary to know that what we do matters.
>If there are evil people, there must be higher things out there, and they might be evil too; we must trust the Supreme to be good and beyond evil and thus holding them in check.
>Basically, given how evil my fellow humans are, it seems likely that unless God is good, than evil has won, and there's no point to what I'm doing.
>Follow the Supreme for now because He's the Omni-Access. Even it turns out to be too much, for whatever reason, fall back on Adept-Tiers.
>Hate to tell you this, buddy, but Creator as a concept could be intrisincally tied to a sentient being somehow, and that dude could be an ass as well. Thus tainting all of Creator. All TTBs, not just Theist, could be revealed to be tied to sentient beings who may not be wholly good in character.
>A Supreme alone can't help with The Darkness, we need to know that God is good!
>
== Why Does God Allow Stupid Shit To Happen To Me: ==
>If God swooped in to save us from anything evil or stupid all the time, there would be no freewill.
>You may or may not deserve the dumb shit that happens to you, but it must be possible,a nd therefore happen occassionally. Otherwise, freewill and its consequences do not exist.
>If we are not allowed to make bad or innaccurate decisions, we do not learn and develop from them. Having everything explained to us is not the same as personal experience from our failures or misfortunes.
>Just because you are good does not mean God should never allow undeserved misfortune to befall you. If you are unaccustomed to misfortunte, you will have no defenses against it. Also, you'll be a softie.
>Hardship does improve us. Things are setup that way, so its natural to assume that's God general plan.
>
== True Widest-Net: Omni-Access: ==
-Does Theist Truly Count As True Widest-Net?:
>Anything is relatable to some Name of God, even other TTBs.  Therefore, there isn't a TTB or thing out there that cannot be encapsulated within some Name.
>Everything is immediately relatable to the Supreme, unlike with the concept of Creator.
>Remember that The Supreme is needed no matter what, to combat The Darkness.
>Being Theist is about being about God AND God's stuff, so both God and not-God fall under Theist.  You can be about stuff separate from God and be about God too.
>Anything within A-Infinity, including any re-rerouting going on, corresponds with a host of Names of God!
>
=== -The Truth About Re-Routing: ===
>Only Theist TTB allows you to be immediately connected to everything and anything else.  Any other TTB or Re-Rout and you eventually end up with Only-Half. 
>Creator TTB or 'Re-Routing' through anything else permanently mean you aren't Widest-Net, since you are shut into that one TTB form.
>If Creator was the TTB of Widest-Net, wouldn't it have worked by now!?
>At first, it makes sense, being open to any re-routing form, to have any object as your primary.  Even as Theist you can temporarily lay the Supreme aside and have something else as your primary, if only in fiction.  That's what the Adept Tiers are for.  But to permanently put the Supreme aside is to suffer Only-Half eventually. 
>The only way to stay Widest-Net is to be Theist TTB, to have the Supreme as your primary object. 
>Technically, everything corresponds to a Name in God, so you could specialize in that Name if you felt inclined to favor one 'thing' in A-Infinity above the rest?
>Remember that being Widest-Net means being open to everything, not suffering Only-Half, and that's only possible with Theist TTB.
>
=== Omni-Access: ===
-Only-Half doesn't really apply to Theist because everything is based on an Aspect(s) within God. Destroyer is the complete and total opposite of Creator. It's not quite the same thing.
>It's counterintuitive, but its true that in order to be about everything, you have to dedicate yourself to just one thing (the Supreme).
>You want to dedicate your life to everything, but this suffers from Only-Half and The Darkness. The correct mindset is to want to be about the Supreme first and everything too but only second. That is Theist.
>Dedicate yourself to God and God's stuff.
>Being generically "about everythng" doesn't work becuse it doesn't give an identity, nothing to be about or what to value over everything else. Obvious to the mind.
>
=== Why You Shouldn't Dedicate Yourself To All Objects Together: ===
-Sum-Total Could Be Bad:
-Only-Half destroys Creator
-You cannot just generically be about 'all things,' since that doesn't give an identity. Which means re-routing through a single object is inevitable.
-Why not just be a generic 'Adept,' a person who is literally about everything, follwoing the aspects of existence, without Creator or Theist?
>No identity. Nothing to use as a value syste.
>A self-identity as a generic Adept gets mired in The Grey.
>It also leads to the Hippie mindset which wants yout o be open to everything. The only problem is that there are some awfully evil things out there.
>A generic Adept mindset can't help with the Great Confusion. To overcome the Graet Confusion you need a value system, which ultimately means you must have one object which is priority above all others.
>Also, unless you keep your Mind's Eye on Him, God tends to get lost in the Great Confusion and falls to the background, leaving you open to The Darkness (or some other loss of a Foundational-Truth).
>Balance demands that you be about one object first, and through that everything else second.
>Because you re opne to all things equally, you never actually know what you stand for, This is why the Great Confusion tears apart any notion of just a generic 'Adept' identity as your TTB.
>Future-Insurmountable!!!
>What if the sum total of existence (be it actualized or not) is somehow negative or evil? We must trust the Supreme to exist as something good, but is there really a gaurantee that existence-in-total is the same? No, there isn't.
>The problem with being about all objects is that you never know if most objects are somehow bad. And who wants to dedicate their life to a TTB that ended up directly leading to that!
>
-
== Future-Insurmountable: ==
-Creator TTB seems appealing because of the certainty afforded by Widest-Net, but Future-Insurmountable cancels that out.
-Creator will try to argue that we cannot know what the Supreme exists as, but this is sophistry, whatever the Supreme exists as, that is all It need be about.
>Logic dictates Aim of the A-Ideal. Culmination removes the need for anything else but the Supreme, which is One.
>This one thing is all that is needed for anything, which in turn validates Future-Insurmountable in relation to Creator TTB.
>The Supreme would not allow anything to be actualized that could compromise Theist, but not gaurantee exists for Creator TTB!
>
=== Widest-Net vs. Future-Insurmountable: ===
-The problem with Widest-Net is Future-Insurmountable. What's God's TTB is, that is the right and unchanging TTB, because God never changes, and it is the object of Theist.
>Who wants to dedicate their life to a TTB and then find out that some actualized truth makes it forever negative?
>Because the Supreme exists and is good, He never comes up against a great truth that ruins Him. Thus, havng your TTB about Him escapes Future-Insurmountable.
>Trusting that the Supreme is good de facto means we assume He will never allow a negative truth to be actualized that ruins Him. Whatever He chooses to do is inherently good.
>Thus, because we assume Him to be beyond evil and thus good, He will never give us a Future-Insurmountable.
>Remember, Theist is about God and whatever He would want us to be about. If God is truly good, He would want to point us to the right TTB!
>So it comes down to Widest-Net/Creator versus Future-Insurmountable/Theist? What is more important, everythng everything or having a TTB that never goes bad?
>Obviously a TTB that never goes bad, since any TTB is unusable if it goes bad, and thus with it any and all benefits.
>
== Pushing Past Emotion: ==
-Ignore the 'When Push Comes To Shove" rhetoric.
-There must be a Supreme, otherwise the Darkness and a whole bunch of other issues come back again.
-Widest-Net is appealing until you realize it leads back to the Grey.
-
-Culmination Of All Systems:
>The Actualized A-Ideal is the end-game of any and all systems possible for determing what the TTB is. It matters not what we mortals can know, only that the Supreme is the A-Ideal.
>The A-Ideal is one thing which has all the Reasons (for it to be TTB) within itself, which It alone has among all A-Infinity.
>The A-Ideal is one thing which is all things combined, which means it is all systems for determing a TTB combined together as well!
>To put it another way, the A-Ideal Actualized is the Culmination of Culminations.
>
Problems with Widest-Net:
>Creator is about all existence, only half of it.
>You are essentially dedicating yoursef to ignorance.
>While meant to eschew doubt, in reality you always owrry that you are missing out on the true TTB!
>Leads to The Darkness inevitably!
>And the Grey as well!
>Unless you cling to God, eventually He fades to the background.
>>Ind. is not enough to cling to God, Ind. is but one answer to several Foundational-Truths.
>
Without God There Is No Certainty
-The only Anchor that matters is the question of what is the best TTB? Obviously, only the Supreme would know, since He alone can see all reasons. We can know the Supreme through Direct-Observation which shows us Almightiness which leads directly to Aim of the A-Ideal (Obvious to the Mind).
== Perfection: ==
-Ind. shows a Supreme exists, that Supreme would want to exist as that which is most perfect. In A-Infinity, we know the A-Idea exists. The Supreme would want to be the A-Ideal.
-It is obvious to the mind that being Perfect means total self-sufficiency. 
-Therefore, the Actualized A-IdealSupreme would need be only about Itself, and so would anything else, for the Supreme is all sufficient in all ways. Anything less is not Perfect.
-The idea of any other rule or 'principle' somehow changing this won't work becaue anything less than total self-suffiency is not Perfection. A Supreme exists, and would want to be perfect, and Perfection means total self sufficiency. 
-As things stand right now, this is what God wants. To not to it would be to risk His anger.
=== Recap of Why A-Ideal: ===
-The Supreme is the Actualizd-A-Ideal. No other rule or principle can draw TTB away from this because any and all principles out there are already active within the Supreme! 
>How do we know there isn't a principle or rule that denies A-Ideal somehow? Because that rule is already active within the A-Ideal Itself! 
>Any reason at all that is out there is already present within the A-Ideal Itself. 
> 
=== How Do You Know There Isn't A Principle Or Something Else That Changes The TTB?: ===
-There are aninfinite number of ptotential principles that somehow shift the TTB away from Theist, but all are met andfullifled by the single Objectof the Supreme. 
>Also, all are contradictory together. 
=== Can We Know What God Would Actualize: ===
-Yes, the A-Ideal would possess all reasons or anything else that God would use to make up His mind. It would possess them all and It alone would possess them, other wise there are two or more Absolute-Ideals. 
-Any reason God would have to actualized something principally, it would reside within the A-Ideal alone. Therefore, God would not have antything else as important. 
- 
=== Culmination of Culminations: ===
-Yes, in potential there must be an infinite number o variations of A-Ideal which are somehow different, perhaps by being more than one object but still somehow counting as a single object. 
-However, there must also be an A-Ideal that is all other variations of A-Ideal combined! And wuuld count as all other A-Ideals at once! 
-Even if there is something beyond 'oneness' itself, whatever system there is out there, the A-Ideal is still the culmination of that! There must be something which is the culmination of all systems! 
- 
=== But What If-: ===
-If the Supreme needs anything other than Itself, It is not all-sufficient! 
- 
== NIggling-Supreme (Why U Can't Be Widest-Net With The Supreme) ==
-The Prblem With Widest-Net is that it may actually cause you to miss out on the true and perfect TTB. 
>Theist claims to be the perfect TTB must you must dedicate yourself solely to the Supreme.
>This is why you either have the perfect TTB or that you don't!
>The thing about Theist TTB is that it is all or nothing in terms of devotion; you can't really follow Theist as Creator TTB beause Theist by design can only be about the Supreme specifically in a principal way.
>Trying to ignore this feature of Theist and still be Creator TTB only results in doubt and headache.
>In essence, Theist is saying it is either Theist or Creator?
>Theist has a working argument for why it is Supreme and its Object is confirmed to exist, so go with Theist!
>Between Creator and Theist, it is Theist that has all the Foundational-Truths, so choose Theist!
>
=== How Do We Know The A-Ideal Works: ===
-It matters not how a Supreme is supreme, only that It is. We could never know the answer to how the Supreme is Almighty, that answer would be infinite.
-What matters is that there is a Supreme. Ind. says there is, and that He must need be only about Himself. 
-
=== How Do We Know There Isn't Another Principle Or Something?: ===
-Any Principle out there, and there would be an infinit emumber of them in Potential, are fulfilled fully by the single Object of the Supreme. 
>The reason there can't be anything else is Spiral-STaircase, there is always an infinite number of competing or contradictory principles to push back against it.
-The Supreme can make exceptions if He wants to, but a Supreme is totally capable of doing and being anything He wants or would need.
-This leads to the logical conclusion that the Supreme is only about HImself, making that His TTB. Ala Spiral-Staircase.
-
== Why A TTB About One Object In Particular: ==
-There are multiple things that require a close and immediate relationship with God, The Darkness, The Grey, the quesiton of validity about Knowledge (ie, Cosmic-Trickster), etc. Ind. might make the cure for the Darkness immediate, but what about all the others? Or the relationshps between them>
-Both creator and Theist claim Widest-Net, but Theist actually has (several) reasons to be Widest-Net while being immediatel about the Supreme.
-You need to be close to God to say alert about these truths and what connects them. Otherwise, you'll forget.
=== Foundational-Truths: ===
-Whatever else may be out there, some truths are universal. There is always the threat of more, and so we need to know several things about God, such as Cosmic-rickster, Ind. against the Darkness, His goodness, etc. 
-Theist keeps God near to your mind, and so these truths are not forgotten. But Creator in practice is about you and God fades to the background. 
-Widest-Net is the anchor, and both Creato rand Theist gives you WN, but Theist keeps you close to the Foundational-Truths as well. 
-
== True Widest-Net: ==
-In theory, Creator is defined as being about all of existene. But in practice, it is really what it has always been, only about creator-oriented stuff, which is only roughly 'half' of existence.-Theist alone connects immediately to all things, for all things are immediately related to God and derive themselves from portions of His infinite essence.
-
=== Why Not Widest-Net: ===
>Instead of giving certainty, it takes it away, especially when you realize that not knowing is practically no different from total ignorance.
>If anything is possibe, anything could be lurking out there. Existence is beautiful unti you realize The Darkness that is out there.
>You don't want to dedicate your life to something and find out later it was bad. Widest-Net could detract from the Supreme, making it bad!
>
== The Darkness Plus Widest-Net: ==
-The Darkness makes Theist necessary: unless you actively cling to the Supreme specifically, your sense of Him can weaken and leave you vulnerable to the Darkness.
>God could change His mind on this TTB, but for now this is the TTB that is dictated by the human condition (ala the Darkness).
-If the Supreme is not immediately sufficient, it is assumed God wants us to use something else for whatever reason. In this case, Theist allows yous to be about anything else because all things are immediately connected to God somehow. Unlike Creator which is only about things from that side of existence that is closer to creation.
-
=== The Darkness Is A Problem Only Theist TTB Can Fix: ===
-The Darkness allows only for Theist. You need to constantly be about God. If other problems arise in A-Infinity, we must trust the Supreme to allow for a solution to be availabe.
>Make no mistake, against The Darkness (which is a definitive threat we have right now) the only answer is Theist. Creator or ay other TTB makes you wnder from God eventually. 
>When you try to be about stuff of Creator, especially if it is secular, you feel tempted to put God at a distance in your mind!
>
== God's Mind Can't Be Known In Fullness: Existence of Objects: ==
-We must know that knowledge is reliable or else we can have nothing. The Great Hope is worthless in the grind of real-life. Cosmic-Trickster looms over all. Either we have PK or we have nothing.
>NUOR is not concrete proof
-PK is an all or nothing kind of thing. Either you can trust knowledge or you can't. The idea of Widest-Net itself could somehow be a lie, for all we know. Cosmic-Trickster ruins everything unless we have PK to keep it all together.
-What if God hasn't gotten around to correcting us?
>If God kept proving our TTBs or any great truths completely wrong, we'd eventually lose trust in Him and knowledge.
>It's better to see God's actions as refining our understanding rather than constantly re-introducing truth to us.
>Remember, all theology is correct somehow, we just spend our lives here on Earth slowly having our theology hammered closer to the truth.
>What this means is that it is okay to trust in AotAI even if God will later correct it, because those corrections will somehow never totally erase AotAI, just refine it.
>
-The Mind of God can never be known in Its fullness; but we can still decide between TTBs based on their Objects. The Object of Theist exists for sure, while Creator may or may not be the true Widest-Net or that an ubber-TTB may even be truly possible without having seen how A-Infinity is actualized!
>Theist with Adept-Teirs is truly about all things (Widest-Net) while Creator is at best only about *half* of A-Infinity.
>If we cannot have the Mind of God in permanence, then the next best Anchor would be the simple question of Existence, since all else depends on Actualization. This is obvious to the mind.
>You don't want to spend your life dedicated to a TTB only to discover that it could never exist the whole time!
>It's true that the Supreme could somehow exist to no wnat Theist, but at least we know the Object of Theist exists. The object of Creator, an ubber-TTB, may or may not exist!
>
-
== God's-Choice: Protected-Knowledge: ==
-Protected-Knowledge/Cosmic-Trickster and Aim of the A-Ideal will win the Shifting for Theist! 
-Cosmic-Trickster trumps NUOR!
-What TTB should we be about? Whichever one is the one chosen by God.
>Your TTB is the primary object(s) you are about. 
-God alone can see all truths about existence; so if He decides that Theist is the best TTB, then why not be Theist?
-We must trust that NT brings us to this, or else all knowledge is unprotected and circumspect. 
*Your TTB is whatever Object(s) you are all about; what you can call your primary Object(s). 
=== Either PK Is True Or We Have Nothing ===
-It's as simple as that. 
-A Cosmic-Trickster could be tricking us. Who knows what could really be out there? Creator might not eist or even be evil for all we know! 
- 
=== God's-Choice vs Widest-Net: ===
-You can't know for sure an ubber-TTB is even possible, as discussed below.
-Also, there could be greater truths than Widest-Net! There's no guarantee that Widest-Net is the greatest truth concerning choosing a TTB, just the best available to us right now. But God can see all truths, so if He decides to be Theist, being about just one Object instead of being open to all equally, than that should tell you something!
=== How Do We Know Protected-Knowledge Is True?: ===
-If God does not offer protective overhead for knowledge, than a Cosmic-Trickster could fucking us all over and all knowledge is circumspect. 
=== How Do We Know Aim of the A-Ideal Is True?: ===
-Aim of the A-ideal is pure Natural-Theology. If NT can be based wholly on nature and make correct logical decisions, and yet arrive at a wrong conclusion, than all of logic is useless. 
-Aim of the A-Ideal is derived directly from observation of the Supreme and deduces with human logic what the Supreme would be about (what Object that He would be about) and thus what we should be about. 
- 
=== But What About Multiple-Religions: ===
-All theology is technically correct since God exists as all things. It's just a matter f forever having your theology added to and corrected.
-If Procted-Knowledge was true we would see a Uniformity of Religion in the world. And we d - because all human religion melds into basic Panendeism.
-Gerald Gardner and others have noted this.
-It's difficult to make this kind of judgement about PK based on other people because we don't really know what's going on internally with them. Are they really following God or the church? Etc.
>Some people are left in theology that teaches falsehood about God, but how many weren't? Isn't it possible those people are still there because they are not yet mature enough to move on? Growing closer to God means mre than just learning knowledge, its behavioral development as well.
-Given that human religion tends to meld into Panendeism, it appears that God does indeed draw all men to a concise idea of Himself, even if that idea of Himself has indistinct lines. Which is fully expected, we mortals could never know God in His entirety.
>People who have left organized religion have pointed out that a big reason they were stuck in it in the first place was because they needed to mature more first.
-We all spend our lives with false theology because God is forever adding to our incomplete theology. So the question is not "are there people living with theology that teaches wrong facts about God,' but "is there evidence God is forever pushing us toward Himself regardless." I propose that ht existence of doubt itself proves that, for it is forever pushing us to question what we know and consider new ideas.
>It makes sense hat all of use die with some wrong theology still in our heads, since we could spend eternity correcting our theology.
>Because the Supreme matters most, it is better to err on the side of following Him and being Theist, rather than Widest-Net.
-Without PK, there is no certainty. Great Hope patently doesn't work, especially with Cosmic-Trickster.
>We don't know what is going on in other people's lives. Did they actually follow God or themselves or the church? You can't know, but you've seen examples of both before!
>PK isn't wrong if other people are being drawn to the truth but are refusing for some reason, like hanging out to outdates superstitious ideas or lack of maturity.
-We were created with logic, Natural-Theology is a feature of nature, and Panendeism is the shared religion across the spectrum of mankind: I think that's enough to prove PK right there.
-There's also the fact that God doesn't answer all questions. Multilple-Religins spring into existence because man is trying to fill in the gaps.
-The Hard Truth is that we need to take the rute of PK, otherwise we have nothing and can be nothing at all.
-If you've realy worked to be open and discerning about God, and study NT, than I would say you can trust your Natural Theology after all. 
---------- 
-You can love God and still resist Him or be closed ff to Him. It happens all the time. It's by knwing that you've been open to God that you can trust that your Natural Theology arrives at the right conclusion.
-The problem with Multiple-Religions is that you don't really know what is going on with other people, not inside their heads. Are they really following God, or something else? Is there a hesitancy on their part or are their intentionally resisting God for whatever reason. You don' tknow.
-Also, how many ppl have been in false theology and left? You don't know the numbers so you don't really know if Multiple-Religions is true or not as an objection to PK.
-Remember that PK doesn't cancel out free-will. God wouldn't force us to follow correct theolgy since it He who gave us free choice.
=== Cosmic-Trickster Proves Aim of the A-Ideal: ===
-CT makes knowing God intimately absolutely necessary. Without a knowable God, CT can destroy all TTBs, including Creator!
-
=== Non-Uniformity of Results: ===
-Doesn't the fact that God allows us to arrive at wrong answers using various methadologies disprove Protected-Knowledge? (Ie, the Shifting, when Xtrians pray for answers but get mixed resuts, etc.).
>No, because when we look at human history, we see a tendency towards henotheistic panendeism. Thus showing that God moves us all towards the same basic religion. If Non-Uniformity was a real thing, we would see human religion going all over the place.
>Remember, if NUR is a thing, you would expect human religion to be flying all over the place theologically. And yet, time and again, religions tend towards henotheistic panendeism. 
-Technically, Non-Uniformity of Results would kill BOTH the Great Hope and Protected-Knowledge, since it would mean that everyone 'above' us is allowing us to come to falsehood. Thus, all knowlege is worthless. 
-----
-Great Hope doesn't work - we are more advanced than other animals, yet we humans are perfectly capable of evil. Sands to reason that some of those 'above' us are also evil as well.
-We have no choice but to believe in Protected-Knowledge. Otherwise, no knowledge can be trusted. It's either PK or bust, existentially speaking.
-False-starts and false VOTs have a reason to exist: to give us obstacles to overcome and make us sronger. But we need to know God well enough in order to make life possible and that includes trusting in His goodness for us. 
-Ppl in power with no needs enjoy be generous and loved. Therefore, God hs no reason o be evi ltowards us, bu only beneficial. But that clearly inludes some rocky section to life. 
-
=== Observation of Supreme Confirms AotAI & PK: ===
-Technically, there are no wrong answers about God, since He exists as everything at once.
-Direct Observation of the Supreme shows that He is indeed all-self-sufficient and thus would only need to be about Himself. Therefore, AotAI is not conjecture or theory but observation.
>'Wrong answers' as per Non-Uniformity of Resuls can clearly be shown to be obstacles to make us stronger in the end. Also, NUOR would lead to a chaos of human theology, and yet we see humanity maintaining henotheisic panendeism down through the ages, in countermand to NUOR.
-Direct observation of the Supreme confirms Protected-Knowledge's base idea that the Supreme is principally about Himself.
-NUOR kills Creator as well as Theist via Cosmic-Trickster.
-Cosmic-Trickster wins everything for Theist all at once.
-If NUOR kills Protected-Knowledge, it also kills Great Hope, since Great Hope is a diversification of Protected-Knowledge.
-
=== Notes: ===
-The All-Father:
-It is Theist and not Creator that makes you open to everything. Creato ris only truly about creating, which is loosely held to be the 'positive' side(s) to Existence. As Creator, you are not about Destroyer.
>We see this when we try to do stuff like being about the Reaper or War as Creator. It doesn't work.
>You can force yourself to take up the ways of destruction as Creator, but not like as Theist. So it is actually Theist which is about all things which is about God, and evrything else (which is immediately related to God).
>Yes, Theist is centered on a single Object, but that Object is necessary in many ways already. So no matter what, any TTB needs that Object to function at all.
>Creator isn't actually all about existence/A-Infinity. It is only about those parts of existence which are more-or-less related to the idea of creating.
>Widest-Net actually supports Theist and not Creator!!!
>In theory Creator is supposed to be about all things, but in practice it often limits us.
>Theist is about God and all His things... which is exactly what A-Infinity is!
>And Theist is about all things by themselves and the Aspect of God that they are based on!
>It is the object of the Supreme alone which fulfills Widest-Net, because of Cosmic-Trickster and all things being founded on an Aspect of God.
>Remember, an ubber-TTB, which is totally needed by Widest-Net, is only possible if the Supreme wills it!
>
-Doubt Eats All
>In the infinite sea of infinity, unless you know the true TTB, doubt will always eat at you.
>Even Widest-Net is not immune to this.
-
-Wandering from God:
>Theist keeps the Supreme forever in the forefront of our minds. Creator allows us to wander.
>Do you think the Supreme would want that?
>
-Known-Objective
>We don't know if an Ubber-TTB, the kind needed by Widest-Net, actually exists or not, or whatever rules the Supreme currently has in place. But we know that the Object of Theist is real, for It is the Supreme.
-
-Certainty and doubt are like fire and water, you cant really have them both a the same time.
>NUOR kills certainty, including some kinds of certainty that we need such as Ind. and Divine-Will.
>If God truly lets us come to wrong answers, than all of PK is done, regardless of Direct-Observation. If He doesn't care about us to come to knowledge of Him, than there is no true knowledge.
>Either Protected-Knowledge is true all of the time or it is useless. What if NUOR is true but a misperception or mistake on our part includes PK itself!?
>Either PK is true all of the time, and seeming acts of NUOR are really just complex answers from God, or else no knowledge is sure and rue. Anything can be proven false at any time, regardless of logic or effort on our part.
>
-The Primary anchor is Knowledge/Certainty.
-All-Reasons
>Only God can see all Reasons (ie, Anchors) for any TTBs. Yet, He chooses to be Theist. Therefore, that must be the best TTB!
>Widest-Net is only one of an infinite number of reasons/Anchors!
>It comes down to God's goodness. If you cannot trust God enough to let you know the proper TTB in this life, than what good is there in pursuing anything at all?
*In practice, there is the idealogical reason for Theist (All-Reasons) and the practical (Pure-Practicality).
>Conversely, how do you know there aren't things out there that cancel out Widest-Net which you just can't see yet!?
>
-NUOR & Free-Will
>God cannot force ppl to lie if they claim to be inspired by Him. Hence, one major reason for suppposed cases of NUOR.
>
-NUOR is incorrect in that it makes God out to be someone who later corrects us, as if we are wrong. Instead, any TTB is technically right, but God is forever expanding our understanding of Him. PK ensures that whatever changes God may enact n the future in regards to our TTB, they will not be 'cancellations' of our current Theist TTB but instead a continuation of it as well as an expansion of it. 
-
Pure-Practicality = Put simply; Creator is way too much of a workload. Theist is shorter, streamlined, and gets to the core of issues much faster. Be theist!
>Remember, any theology is technically correct! Thanks to Adept Tiers, we can be Theist and still be about everything else as well!
>Since NUOR will always keep us from knowing Gods exact plan, why not choose based on a much more human element? Like practicality.
-
-Protected-Knowledge (the idea that God is all about Himself and wants us to be about Him) carries with it a sense of urgency that means God would want to bring us to Him sooner rather than later. This counters NUOR which implies that God takes His time and we can never know for sure what TTB He wants.
>Remember that AotAI is Direct-Observation of the Supreme!
-If Protected-Knowledge isn't real, than a Cosmic-Trickster could be tricking us all in an infinite number of ways.
-NUOR opens the gates for The Darkness to come back in, because eventually it causes you to become distanced from God since nothing about Him can be truly known (according to NUOR).
>In reality, the cure for NUOR is Direct-Observation. The only known 'part' of God is that HE is Almighty. Almightiness leads to All-Sufficiency, which is really Aim of the A-Ideal.
>We know that a Supreme exists ala Ind. An Almighty being could be or do anything, which in effects means It is all-sufficient.
>Ergo, Theist.
>NUOR implies a mistake of perception on our part, but Direct-Observation goes past indirect perfepction and directly to the Supreme.
-NUOR might be true, but Natural-Theology and Direct-Observation are definitely true, which puts the ball in Theist's court.
>And once we have that, the Will of God kicks in as the supreme Anchor, making Theist the chosen TTB.
-God goes back to correct us. The existence of Doubt itself is evidence of this. NUOR does not take that into account.
>
-NUOR is really evidence of nothing. It is a well established fact taht life is complicaed, and the Creator is infinitely complicated, using complex plans that cross with each other. It stands to reason that what appears to be NUOR is really well-calculated instances planned by the Supreme which merely have the appearance of being wrong.
>IE, God lets people come to wrong conclusions in order to carry out a plan and produce greater good later. Ostensibly also to teach them in the long run.
>By itself, this is just an opinion; but remember that we do see Uniformity of Religion (Henotheistic Pandendeism), Direct-Observation, etc.
-
-The intelligence that is given to man must be sufficient, or else our cause was doomed from the beginning.
>When we look at the Supreme (Direct-Observation) we see that He is All-Sufficient.
>
-If NUOR is true, there is effectively no Protected-Knowledge. We can't know how often God lets us come to wrong answers or whatnot. Maybe He doe sit most or even all of the time!
>We must assume that 'wrong answers' are actually split -answers, because we humans often ask the wrong questions.
>If there is no PK< there is no Knowledge. Our cause is lost completely.
>There is no half-measure to NUOR in life; any NUOR results in an end to PK.
>Creator will try to argue for a 'balanced' sense of NUOR, but in the hardness of real-life, any NUOR results in an end to PK, because once you say God lets wrong answers come, you can't possibly know how often that happens, and that just wrecks PK.
>So the real question is PK vs NUOR. Which one wins, because you can't have both!
>Direct-Observation, Uniformity of Religion, and other principles like Natural-Theology all point to Protected-Knowledge!
>
-Uniformity of Results:
-God allows obstacles so that we may learn from them and grow.
-Discernment is a skill, something you learn through practice and use.
-AotAI is based not on conjecture and theorems, but on direct observation of the Supreme Himself.
-AotAI is pure Natural Theology; Logic is cleraly the mental faculty given to us to figure things out. That's why God-Talking is not considered reliable; its based more on emotion which changes according to all sorts of stimuli.
-Natural Theology can totally be investigate and debunked, at least to some extent.
-If a natural conclusion drawn directly off of observation of the Supreme doesn't count as Protected-Knowledge, than nothing does.
-For the record, the 'bad answers' you had in the past were definitively disproven by NT, so there's that too.
-Technically, I've never had a wrong answer given, either just silence or interference.
-Logic is the (only) faculty we are given to determine how things work and what exists; AotAI is logically derives from observation of the Supreme; should that prove not true, that would ruin our sense of trust in NT and Logic itself. God would not want that.
-God has never given a wrong answer. However, humans have lacked discernment, read into silence or interference, or just relied on the fiction of organized religions. I know this from years of personal experience!
>God doesn't give wrong answers beause God rarely 'speaks' Himself, instead letting human sense and Natural Theology do all the explaining for us.
-The existence of NT in nature and us humans having logic shows we are meant to figure things out. It stands to reason that God does indeed lead us onwards to truth, although He will put obstacles in our way to force us to use logic to figure them out.
-If God only ever gave us the right answers without any problems, we would never develop real discernment.
-You can know AotAI is Protected-Knowledge because it is flawless Logic, derived from observation of the Supreme. If it's wrong,
-Protected-Knowledge vs. Non-Uniformity of Results:
*Formerly known as Uniformity of Results, which is really Non-Uniformity of Results.
-It is obvious to the mind that obstacles are put in our path so that we may grow. We see this happen in our own lives. It makes sense.
-However, when un-flawed logic leads to a precise conclusion which is wrong anyway, that's when Protected-Knowledge truly breaks down.
-Emotions come and go, but has Natural Theology ever been conclusively shown to be wrong when based on direct observation?
-Assumed-Adversary/Cosmic-Trickster will destroy anything not explicitly protected by the Supreme. Like it or not, we need PK.
-It is recognized that coming to know God is a task, which does include mistakes and misinformation. But we can see that these obstacles serve a purpose, to build us up.
-The idea that God gives us obstacles like this to build us up is a valid one, and it does explain why we see a lack of uniformity in results when trying to get knowledge of God.
-At some point, human logic goes as far as it can.
-At some point, you simply have to trust in God's goodness, that He would not let you dedicate your life to a TTB like that and then let you down later.
-If God is good, He would let us have access to the true TTB in this life, and let us be able to come to it through truth and knowledge. Otherwise, he is a god of darkness and doubt.
-
=== Cosmic-Trickser Trumps NUOR: ===
-Either you know hte best TTB or you don't. Widest-Net doesn't cut it because there's always the possibility of something out there *somehow* nullifying it. 
-The whole point behind the TTB is CERTAINTY. The only way to have cerainty is to know the chosen TTB of God!
-It is obvious to the mind that the Supreme trumps all else. And the question of what the Will of the Supreme is also trumps all else.
-The problem with Creator/Widest-Net is that it does lead to relativism; since nothing can be ascertained for sure, nothing can be concretely known, and thus nothing can be fully committed too. Imagine never being able to arrive fully at a decision!
-Life requires Certainty, therefore He would alow us to have some of it!
-NUOR is defeaed by the founding principle of Protected-Knowlege; taht God wouls want us to be about Him, that He wants us to know Him because it is His nature to be about Himself. Without this, Cosmic-Trickster looms over all truths and all TTBs!
-Once PK is established, then the Will of God kicks in!
-NUOR is invalidated because all theology is somehow correct, and God may call ppl to do different vocations in life, including moralities that may seem incongreous but are actually part of a larger plan.
-Technically, NUOR kills Creator as well, since at any time in the future, God may reveal something that totally breaks Creator TTB as well.
-NUOR will always lead to relativism and the Darkness, because NUOR cracks the foundation of all certainty in knowledge, which is Protected-Knowledge. We must believe that God leads us to knowledge of Himself, one way or another, or else nothing can be trusted. 
-NUOR is invalidated because it will always lead to doubt, has been show to do just that in practice, and because it can be shown that all theology is somehow true and we cannot know God's plans for all people. Seemingly conradictory answers might actually be part of a bigger plan. There is no way to actually confirm or deny that NUOR is a real thing in real life. 
>In lieu of NUOR being real or not, we have Direct Observation of the Supreme which points to Aim of the A-Ideal. Will of God, Protected-Knowledge, these things all flow together from the Supreme!
-Will of the Supreme trumps Widest-Net.
-NUOR may or may not be true, but Observation of the Surpeme and Natural-Theology is known to be real and points to Protected-Knowledge.
-Without PK, there is no Creator, doubt will always eat away at anything and everthing!
-Without Protected-Knowledge, doubt will eat away at any TTB.
-Cosmic-Trickster trumps NUOR, especially since NUOR may not even be real! (all theology is technically true, etc.).
NUOR Invalidates Will of God; But Not Existence of Object.
-The Object of Theist is the Supreme, which we know exists.
-But the Object of creator is an ubber-TTB that may or may not exist, and which we cannot confirm!
-
=== Doesn't NUOR Kill Theist?: ===
-NUOR may not kill PK outright, but it means we can't be air-tight in our arguments for Theist. Any fact could turn out later to have been false, unprotected by God!
>Direct-Observation of the Supreme confirms Aim of th eA-Ideal, which means supposed instances of NUOR must be explained as God rerouting or giving a mixed answer to a bad question. Ie, God may not have the exact same morality for all of us, etc.
>There's also the fact that ppl can jsut straight up lie. God won't control ppl and keep us from lying and giving bad theology unknowingly. 
>As long as AotAI is true, the notion of NUOR doesn't make sense - God wouldn't tolerate us resting in ignorance of Him. It would violate His nature.
*There's no gaurantee that God wants us all to follow he same morality or religion. It could be that God has set us up to follow Him in various ways. Ie, Catholics, Muslism, Deists all have their unique part to play, etc. What we percieve as NUOR could simply be our own false expectations being proven wrong.
>If direct-observation can't be trusted, than what do we really have?
>
-
=== Modes-of-Knowledge vs NUOR: ===
>Not all ways of knowing God are equal. God-Talking is less rustworthy than Natural-Theology, and most of Natural-Theology is less trustworthy than Direct-Observation. 
>While we can't see all of God actualized, when we see Almightiness, we can extropolate from that. 
>God may allow obstacles, Protected-Knowledge has to be a thing or else we have nothing.
-If we can't trust God to let us know the central truths, like TTB, than what does PK as a principle really do?
-
=== Killing Widest-Net: ===
-The idea behind WN was that you had to be about all things in order to be sure you had all your bases covered (existentially speaking).
-But really that's not true. It's totally possible that being about all things at once leads to some great evil in the long run?
-Only the Supreme can see all reasons and thus has made the right choice for sure. His TTB is the right TTB to be.
-The question is... can we truly know that TTB?
-
=== Maybe NUOR Shows PK Is Limited?: ===
>Protectd-Knowledge must be exact, oherwise the chaos of life (and infinite variables) means none of us will come to the truth in the long run!
-
=== Further Notes: ===
-NUOR < Modes of Knowledge
>NUOR can only be seen in lesser modes like Natural-Theology and God-Talking. Direct-Observation gives nothing but uniformity!
-Three known modes of knowledge; Natural-Theology, Direct-Observation, and God-Talking (prayer).
-That which is Almighty only needs itself, for any other reason is cancelled out by an infinite number of counter-reasons.
-
*If Protected-Knowledge is true, God would want us to know Him, and to know Him relatively soon. We can trust that He would deliver us to the right TTB of Him within this life.
-PK is an exact thing; either it works or it doesn't.
-How much can we know about God?
>Relatively little, but through Direct-Observation/Aim of the A-Ideal, we can trust that God lets us know enough to suffice to follow Him.
>It doesn't make sense; assuming the Supreme does have an intention for us to follow a TTB, He would make it possible for us to be reasonably sure that the TTB to be followed.
-
-That which is Almighty is only about the object of Itself, for Almightiness equals All-Sufficiency.
-Just as the Supreme needs nothing else, It would also want us to be about nothing else, otherwise the Supreme is somehow deficient.
>For the Supreme to be Supreme, It must be the only thing both God or anyone needs to be about.
>This fact reinforces Protected-Knowledge. Why would God care if we know Him? Because otherwise, He is deficient!
>
-Doesn't NUOR Kill Theist?:
-No, because Direct-Observation reaffirms that the Supreme is Aim of the A-Ideal.
>This means that the Supreme would want us to know Him, if for no other reason that it is His nature. Even if He didn't care about us, it would mean no effort to Him and would fulfill His nature according to our observation.
>Doubt will always find a way to eat awy at any TTB, even Creator with its Widest-Net. Only Protected-Knowledge keeps Theist forever protected.
>An infinite-being would be involved in all things, if for no other reason that HE could be without any real effort at all.
>Assuming the Supreme has an intention regarding us, we should seek it out if for no other reason that to court His favor.
>And given He is about the Object of Himself, He would allows us to know His intention, which has been shown through Natural Theology to be Theist via AotAI.
>
-How can you be sure Creator TTB isn't somehow bad?
>You can't, no twithout Protected-Knowledge (which is what NUOR always leads to). You could spend your life serving a TTB that is somehow bad or evil!
>
-Is God Involved In Our World?:
>Only the Supreme could have gotten everything started. If He started it, it stands to reason He has an inteest in it.
>In the first moment of Aeternity, only the Supreme could have existed, else something else is also required besides the Supreme. Hence, the Supreme has to be the Creator, the one who started it all.
>Because only the Supreme can make final decisions about existence, herefore at some point He made the decision to have us, therefore He is invested in Us at least to some extent.
-Ergo, Protected-Knowledge, since He would want His creations to know Him. After all, He already spent time to make us, so why not?
>God made us or at least puts up with us, so why not fulfill His nature and also bring us to Him?
>The real question that NUOR raises is whether God is truly involved in or world or not, or is PK just a pipe dream?
>
-What if there is more?
>Whatever else is out there, God wouldn't let it radically change our understanding of Him, lest we lose confidence in knowledge of Him.
*The problem with Creator is that things of Destroyer are excluded from your purview!
Direct-Object:
-Ind. - Aim of the A-Ideal - Protected-Knowledge - Direct-Observation - A-Ideal - Spiral-Staircase - Theis!
-The Almighty would want to be the best, which we know is the A-Ideal (whatever form that takes?)
>Spiral-Staircase means the A-Ideal alone can be what the Supreme would wan to be, for every over option would have an infinite list of better alternatives, something which only the A-Ideal cannot have!
>
Why Theist Specifically?:
-Stick close to the Supreme or else you may lose your sense of Him and become sussceptible to the Darkness.
>It's true that knowing God can he hard, but Ind. proves He's real.
>
-God is not obligated to any a question just because you ask Him.
-----------------------------
-How can we know God wnat change this TTB later?:
>If God allows us to spend our lives in false or imperfect TTBs, that doesn't speak well to His character. 
>It's always been understood that ppl leave organized religions that teach falsehood once they start really asking deep theological questions. That, or their religion waters down to the baseline Panendeistic Henotheism.
>Point of order; even in Abrahamist or other organized religions, you are still technically Theist. 
>Everyone who believes in God tends to adhere to the idea of Solus Deus, which is the heart of being Theist. 
>Solus Deus pops up across all religions as people's minds eventually discern it from the natural order of things (ie, Natural-Theology).
>
-Everything Taught Is True:
>If Natural Theology teaches us something that later turns out not to be true about God, that would undermine our ability to follow Him. Ergo, He would not allow it.
-NUOR makes so much sense once you realize that God tends not to overtly 'speak' to us so much as He lets us discern truth from Natural-Theology.
-The initial premise of PK holds true, that unless God is actively drawing us to Him and safeguarding knowledge of Him (by whatevermeans) than no knowledge can be trusted and we have nothing.
>Instances of NUOR or other violations of PK must have an alernative explanation.
>Direct-Observation and Aim of the A-Ideal support this!
-
-How does Protected-Knowledge prove Aim of he A-Ideal?
>Direct-Observation; We know an Almighty Being exists...
-Whatever else we may know of God, or not know, we know that God is primarily about Himself, and so would want us to know Him, because that fulfills His nature. Ergo, He would make His chosen TTB available to us for knowing.
>The logic God gave us dictates that an Almighty Being is only about Itself, because that is all that He needs to be about.
>
As Things Stand Now:
-God may indeed change things later, but for now, the current information we have is that God is Theist in terms of TTB and would want us to be as well.
>To willfully choose not to be Theist would thus be to go against the Will of God.
>This is the point where you just need to trust in the goodness of God; that any changes He makes in the future will be beneficial and understandable in the long run.
>No, Widest-Net is not actually the 'natural TTB,' because you can't even know for sure tha an ubber-TTB even exists!
>
-Seeds of Doubt = Once you allow for any variation of NUOR, it's only a matter of time before all of epistemology falls apart. Because once you 'allow' for God not safeguarding knowledge, at some point you realize that any TTB, even the ubber-TTB that is Creator, could turn out to e nonexistent or evil somehow (or something else that is bad).
>What's worse, trusting in the Supreme who may have witheld some truth from us or trusting in any number of Cosmic-Tricksters out there?
>Even int he event that NUOR is proven true; we know a Supreme exists via Direct-Observation, which is more evidence than an ubber-TTB like Creator. Why dedicate yourself to an assumption!?
>
Only Half of Existence
>IN practice, Creator only lets you really be into half of the stuff in Existence, thus defeating the whole point behind Widest-Net!
>Creator is only about stuff that is strictly creative or creation-oriented.
>
*Remember Adept Tiers!
== What Should We Be About?: ==
-Whatever the perfect thing, the Supreme, is all about, which is the object of Itself, as per Aim of the A-Ideal.
-Stick to this and push past the tides of the Shifting.
-
== The Will Of God: ==
-It's easy to fall back and be about yourself, but we must have a Supreme, and so His will matters more!
-The Will of God is the primary Achor for the Supreme is supreme and thus is the only thing that matters at all. 
>Once everything is simplified, the only thing that really stops the Darkness is the Supreme, the mere fact of multiple 'supremes' is enough to cause urgency, because parts leads to unknown and thus doubt.  
>Do you want to make the Supreme angry or disappointed?
>If all Anchors lead up to the Supreme, than the Will of the Supreme leads to the TTB that is the result of all Anchors! 
-Will of God revealed via Aim of the A-Ideal. 
=== Will Of God vs Widest-Net: ===
-The existence of the Supreme automatically makes It the most important thingi n existence and all knowledge hinges on that. Therefore, It comes before all else. 
-Also, ubber-TTB can't be known to exist if you question the existence of Actualized A-Ideal! A-Infinity can't be known either! 
== Knowing-God: ==
-Despite Creator's assertion that the Actualized A-Ideal can't be known without seeing all of A-Infinity, we can trust that God will deliver us to correct knowledge about Him or else all knowledge is circumspect! 
>Sometimes knowledge of God is confusing, but we can trust that God brings us through trials and tribulations. Again, the only alternative is to not have anyprotective overhead in a a vast metaphysical sense and thus have nothing at all! 
== Epistemology: ==
-Without Certainty, Fear builds up until it overtakes all.
-Without God, no knowledge can be trusted, not even of Creaor.
-The Shifting was caused by nuance, and doubt, not by a lack of God's voice; I was being nudged over and over again to perfect my Natural Theology, as evidenced in hindsight. Creator and Theist were too alike, I needed a way to separate them.
-It is a recognized truth that God allows evil in order to bring about a good later on.
-How do you find the voice of God? = the same way you do anything, with logic. And trust that God protects your knowledge and logic, or else there is no certainty or truth to be had in this life!
>Information is only as good as its mode and source, which is immediae to the mind, and different modes and sources have varying degrees of trustworthiness; which is why NT is more trusted than God-Talking.
-Does it not make sense that God allows the Confusion to happen precisely so we can learn to tell truth from falsehood,and thus know Him more clearly.
-How do you know the Aim of the A-Ideal is true? Because you can't find a flaw in it! That's how!
-
-Unless you know what God exists as exactly, and A-Ideal too, you can't be sure an Ubber-TTB actually exists. No Creator TTB!
>
-Creator is relativism and ignorance. It is a TTB built on assumption itself.
-Information is judged by is source: Natural Theology comes from unchanging nature, while the Shifting is based off of human emotion, which comes from who knows where.
-  
=== Can We Know God Fully: ===
--We need a balanced kind of Procted-Knowledge; to know that our knowledge is more-or-less accurate but also to understand that we will never fully know God. Otherwise, we end up with vapid and incomplete TTBs like Theist/Creator which lead to unhealthy behavior or we run into The Darkness because of doubt!  
-This is why, at some point, we must recognize that we've gone as far as we can and just trust God. We must trust He gave us enough to know His basic TTB (Aim of th eA-Ideal)).
-
== Why Not Just Be Creator: ==
-Why not just be Creator in general? - the Will of the Supreme!
>Unless you know the Will of the Supreme for sure, it bothers you.
-There is no real guarantee that actualized A-Infinity even allows for a single TTB of itself.
-
== Protected-Knowledge: Guiding Hand ==
-Protected-Knowledge is the idea that knowledge is only reliable if we can be sure God protected it. That is, He keeps us from being interefred with by other powrs out there or by our own mortal weaknesses. 
>Multiple-Religions: the problem with the objetion of Multiple-Religions is that it presumes that God acts all at once. There are many ppl in Xtrianity who believe God is Truine, but how many are eventually led out? Will they all be led out eventually, either at this time or in this life or a future one? You can't know.
>Furthermore, Natural Theology shows a sort of trial-and-error, and also shows that the process of learning about God occurs in steps. It's not an all-and-done sort of thing.
>Natural Theology shows that the Creator wanted to lead us to truth. Why else give us intellects and the means to exercise them?!
>Delayed-Answers = What if God simply hasn't gotten around to telling us something that will counter Theist? Or some other long-held and imporant truth about Him?: the answer to that objection is that we need to remember the basic goodness of God. God would want us to know Him, so He would not discourage us by constantly jarring us with delayed answers like that.
>If we keep geting wrong answers about Him, natural thoelogy would be abandoned, and that would not allow us to know God, which is what God would want.
>Technically, anything you believe about God is true, because the A-Ideal is all things at once; it's just that it may not be as dominant or important as you think it is.
>How do you know God won't eventually teach something that counters Creator too? It's a toss up between them, in that case. Either we believe in God's goodness and His wanting us to know Truth, or else everthing is relative and up in the air.
>
=== Assumed-Adversary: ===
-Given the enormity of what can exist, it is wise to assume that something out there is above us, has power over us, and for whatever reason is attempting to manipulate us and skwewer our perception of existence itself.
-This makes Theist essential, ala Protected-Knowledge.
=== Trust Is Inevitable: ===
-You can keep arguing for Theist and Protected-Knowledge until your liver gives out, but the reality is that at some point you just hav eto trust in the basic goodness of God. Would God let you dedicate yourself to a TTB completely onlyt o pull the proerbial rug out later? You can probably generate arguments for or against it, but will that mater? You don't knw all of God! 
-Trust is inevitable. Evenually, you need God epistemologically at least, and from that you need to trust that He will not jerk your around just for kicks. 
=== Obfuscation of God In Our Lives: ===
-Natural Theology exists and shows that God wants us to know truths about Him. It's a clear shot of logic when you realize God is Almighty, that He therefore is all things, making Him all0sufficient, thus needing to be only about Himself. We can play it out in the imagination provided by our Maker. 
-It's true that some stuff like God-Talking can lead to contradiction or obscurity, but no one can know for sure all the methods God uses to draw us to Him and thus to knowledge. It stands to reason that part of that process will mean dealing with bad info. 
-Huma beings down through history usually arrive at an idea of a Supreme that is basically the same. Taht speaks to me of God drawing us to knowledge of Him. 
- 
=== Inevitable-Trust & Always More Principle: ===
-God would not withold important info like that that would counter our basic ideas of Him. That would counter His desire for us to know Him, which is what HE is all about. 
-In pracical terms, Inevitable-Trust means stop discoutning Theist because of the parts of God you don't know. 
- 
=== But God Has Allowed Error In the Past: ===
-Natural Theology and the history of mankind havin roughly the same idea about the Supreme show that God does indeed pull us towards Him. 
-However, in the coplexity of life, we can see that God does allow error in order to bring about good later on, such as learning or example or somesuch. My own history of the Shifting has actually brought about good, such as the teaching of Ind. 
-
=== Multiple-Religion: ===
-It's easy to declare that the existence of multiple religions shows that God doesn't care, but even wrong theology touches on ruths of God, to say nothing of the fact that none of us have totally correct theology.
-It's not possible to know all the variables in other people's religious life, but in my own experience, I have felt called / been pushed out of errenous religious positions. Life has a way of hammering away at wrong theology.
-
=== Cosmic-Trickster is Greater Than Widest-Net: ===
-Obviously
-
== Ultimate-Objective: ==
>The ultimate-objective of Theist is the Supreme which we know exists! But Creator's UO is A-Infinity, but we don't know what the actualized A-Infinity would be like, or even if it's possible for it to have a single TTB like Creaor wants!
>There's also the problem that some other TTB might turn out to be better, and you'd have to abandon Creator TTB, wasting all effort you put into it.
>At least we know Supreme exists.
>
== Widest-Net: ==
>The problem with Widest-Net is that either you know the TTB or you don't. Not knowing will always bother you, regardless of metaphysical tricks like Widest-Net.
>How do you know A-Infinity even allows for an ubber-TTB to cover all of it? Anything is possible!
>
=== True Widest-Net: ===
-Creator claims to be about all things, but in practice you can't connect with things of Destroyer, such military, war, thanatology, etc. Theist can connect equally with all things because all things are based on aspects within the Supreme. 
-Without the Supreme, nothing can be known or had at all, so the Supreme as an object is always necessary. This too is Wisdom.
-
=== Killing Widest-Net: ===
>An ubber-TTB, that allows you to be about all things, might not even be real! A-Infinity Actualized might exist in such a way that makes it impossible (anything is possible,remember).
-Why dedicate your life to something you assume to exist when we know the Supreme is real for sure?
>Cretainty comes before Assumption.
-Widest-Net seems like a good idea t first, because it covers everything; but in reality it is loaded with uncertainties.
== Take The Screws To Creator: ==
-The reason you keep pulling towards Creator is because you keep assuming its strengths while doubting God. 
-Be as critical of Creator as you are of Theist!
-
== Creator Might Not Even Be Real: ==
-There is no real gaurantee that A-Infinity Actualized even allows for an ubber-TTB. Anthing is possible!
-There is no gaurantee that Creator TTB actually exists or is possible given our Actualized reality. The fullness of our actualized reality may not allow for any single TTB to be about all of it like Creator wants to be. 
-It is totally possible that our Actualized Reallity does not allow for a single TTB. A universal TTB like Creator may exist in Potential, but we can't know if its actualized.
-There is no way to know that an ubber-TTB like Creator (which is Widest-Net) would even be possible or even desirable. Anything is possible. Somehow, the ubber-TTB could even turn out to be evil!?
-Take the nails to Creator!
-Creator TTB is the Many, but we have no idea what the sum of the 'many' even is, either in Potential Reality or Actualized Reality. Widest-Net is a benefit, but there could be other features that make it undesirable.
-There isn't the same gaurantee of knowledge with Creator as there is wih Theist!
>Remember that unless knowledge is outright protected, it is assumed to be wrong somehow!
== Theist Alone is Truly About All Things: ==
-Creator can't be about anything that isn't Creator-specific, like the military or Robin Hood.
-
== The Darkness: ==
-The Darkness is the primary Anchor because it is the sum of all evil and is the reason to believe in a God even in our secular modern age.
-
== Upset-God: ==
-The problem with Creator in general, and Widest-Net specifically, is that it does not guarantee against God being 'upset' or otherwise at odds with your chosen TTB.
-While Widest-Net covers all things, that does not itself gaurantee Certainty in all ways. 
-Either you know the correct TTB or you don't. There are no copouts or shortcuts.
-
== Widest-Net: ==
-The problem with WN is that it is based on assumption. There is no guarantee that the totality of our actualized reality is even conducive to WN. 
-This is where Creator TTB truly came from.
-WN is based on assumption and lends itself towards ignorance. It is the path to relativism. 
-You can't be sure that the totality of Actualized reality is not somehow hostile to WN.
-What makes you sure A-Infinity can even have only one TTB?
-You may not know the totality of the single Object of Theist, but Creator has an infinite number of objects of which you are ignorant!
== Serving Two Masters: ==
-Once you simplify the equation, the only difference beween A-Ideal and A-Infinity is that A-Ideal is one and not many. You cannot be dedicated to a concept and God at the same time, one will eventually take prominence. We are wired to be that way.
>Concept of Creator is apart from God, you can love Creator and dislike God. Or at least be distant to Him.
-
>God is necessary, for Knowledge especially, but to also include another concept apart from Him is to try and serve two masters.  
== Can't Know Actualized A-Ideal: ==
-By ourselves we cannot know for sure the Actualized A-Ideal. But all knowledge is inherently doubtful. We need to trust that the Supreme guides us to proper knowledge of Him, just as we need Him to have confidence in anything or any knowledge. This is the mistake Creator makes when it argues that we can't know God. 
-Advanced awareness of the Actualized A-Ideal is inevitably needed. You need to know certain things about the Supreme in order to know anything at all, such as knowing that knowledge can be trusted or that God is good. So deciding to not trust anything definitive about the Supreme is setting yourself up for ignorance and uncertainty. 
-We may not know all of A-Infinity, but we can immediately know the Supreme and His only one part, which is Alightiness. We can extract from that sufficient information to make judgements about the Actualized A-Ideal. 
>We can immediately know the Supreme, and extract info from that, without having to know the rest of A-Infinity. 
-That fact that something is recognized as being Almighty is itself a recognition that it is A-Ideal, in that It has or is capable of all traits possible in existence.
-While we cannot know all actualized traits of A-Ideal, we can know that It is connected by Almightiness and therefore exists as a single thing of study.
>An Intimate God is necessary for knowledge, not knowing God well enough leads to a lack of trust in knowledge itself.
>You can't know the fullness of existence either, the sum total of A-Infinity could turn out to be very animical to Creator in any variation; anything is possible!
>You can't know most of God, but you can't know most of infinity either!
>You can never be sure something out there somehow makes pick-and-choose somehow bad.
>the Sea of Infinity tends to make a mockery of both Theist and Creator, not just Theist!
>All Knowledge relies on trust of God, so we must trust that He guides us to correct knowledge of Him.
>Only knowledge of God can beat the Grey.
-There is absolutely no way to know that the sum total of infinity *somehow* cancels out Creator in all variations!
-The Grey:
>The Sea of Infinity makes a mockery of both Theist and Creator. We cannot know all of either God or all of creation; however, we can know the Supreme does exist and can know somethings about Him (since all Knowledge relies on trusting Him).  Ergo, only Theist truly beats the Grey, since all Knowledge (the Grey is the antithesis of knowing) relies ultimately on the goodness of God.
>
-Knowing the Sum Total:
>The sum total of AInfinity could be hostile to Creator, even counter Creator in any variation, regardless of pick-and-choose.
>However, we can know the Supreme and figure out certain things about Him.  At the very least, we have Aim of the A-Ideal.
>
-How Do You Know Creator Doesn't Lead to Something Bad In th eEnd Every Time!?
-Force of Discipline:
>Theist gives focus and thus leads to progress, while Creator squanders energy on multiple fronts and uncessary things!
>Also, Creator turns vague over time, but Theist is about a definitive Object!
>
-Basing Your Life On Unknown Objects:
>We can know more about the single Object of Theist (which is God) than we can of Creator, which is about all Objects!!!
>Pick-and-choose means nothing against the potential threats of A-Infinity.
>
=== Protected-Knowledge: ===
-Unless we know for sure that something is protecting knowledge, all knowledge is suspect. The Supreme would want us to know of Him beause that is what He is about. 
>Without Protected-Knowlege, then there is no knowledge at all! 
-The argument that we live in a world with multiple ideas of God does not refute this point: while there are different religions, the concept of a Supreme remains mostly the same. Differences in belief about God's attributes can also be attributed to God bringing people to Him slowly, using different 'paths' of development according to the needs of the individual. We also see in nature that the Creator sets things up to interlock with each other, so the idea of differen religions has actually been a net benefit on mankind via competition. All these and more explain the differences in opinion without refuting the concept of Protected-Knowledge.
-The Great Hope of Creator is really just an argument from assumption.
-Gerald Gardner said it best, behind all religions and traditions is the sense of a mysterious Otherness that is above and in charge of all things. How is that not enough to be Theist? 
-Once we have Protected-Knowlege, this leads to the Aim of the A-Ideal which gives us Theist as the exact TTB of the Supreme. 
-Natural Theology shows that God does indeed guide us. It's very existence affirms Protected-Knowledge.
-As mortal creatures we cannot see all of God, so He can only teach us so much. Man-made religions tend to be built on those parts of God which fall outside Natural Theology.
-What God has already taught via natural theology, He would not latter cancel. He would expand on it, but if He truly is about Himself, He would not teach falsehoods about Himself. Aim of the A-Ideal is therefore true forever. 
-
== Simplifying The Equation: ==
-Your two options are Creator (A-Infinity/existence) and Theist (A-Ideal/Supreme). Theist keeps everything immeidately about the Supreme.
-Which Anchor should be used as primary? The truth is that there is an infinite amount of Anchors. All Anchors combined is the A-Ideal/Supreme. 
*While we can't know for sure what the Supreme exists as, It definitely is united by Almightiness, and not all things that exist are Almighty. Almighty is the litmus test to separate God from not-God. 
>Besides, all knowledge relies on trust in God. Trust that God guides us to the truth about Him. 
>We don't need to see all of God in order to follow Him. As long as we have a concrete part(s) (ie, Almightiness) that we know exist,w e can work with that and then learn more as we move along existence. 
*Both Creator and Theist have imperfect Affinity. 
>Not everything we know about the Supreme has to be factual First Hand Knowledge. Just the important stuff like A-Ideal, Supreme, Ind., and Almightiness. You're a fool if you think much of what you know about Creator won't turn out to be somehow wrong in the end! 
=== The Darkness: ===
-Only the Supreme can defeat the hard atacks of the Darkness. It requires immediate awareness of and intimate knowledge of the Supreme. 
-Creator's vague notion of higher powers, all of them working together to be infinite, fails because it adds parts and hte unknown. The fact that it is vague is itself an opening for the Darkness! 
-The Darkness is the tipping point in simplifying the equation. 
- 
=== Can The Actualized Supreme Be Known: ===
-We can' tknow what the Supreme exist as exactly, but we can know that Almightiness exists, that it does exist, that it exists as we know it does, and that God definitely has it. 
-We can also know that the Supreme is all-sufficient as per Aim of the A-Ideal and that there is nothing in A-Infinity outside of Itself that It would need. Anything outside A-Ideal would be cancelled by infinite-variation. 
=== Further Notes: ===
-Creator is about all things but Theist is about the Supreme specifically. What should we be about? It is obvious to the mind that the Supreme specifically is the AST (All-Suffificent Thing). Therefore, we should be about that specifically or else invoke error int our way of life. 
-This is important: remembering what Creator and Theist are actually about. It's what allows you to jude the two.
-The Darkness keeps you Theist
>Creator cannot defeat Darkness because it has parts!
-Everything Must Be Immediately About God:
>Or we become vulnerable to The Darkness!
-Can't See All Of Supreme, Can't See All Of Existence Either!
-It's Easier to believe in Creator but makes you susceptible to The Darkness!
-
-The only true Anchor is All-Sufficiency because that is all Anchors combined!
-If God wanted you to be about anything else, wouldn't that make God unwise?
== The All-Sufficient Thing: ==
-Which Anchor should we use? All of them!
-Even if Creator wins a certain Anchor, like Affinity, how can you be sure there isn't an even more important anchor just around the corner? 
-Only the A-Ideal specifically can provide answers to all problems. Least-Parts dictates that you dedicate yourself to that thing solely (as in, Category of One!).
-My whole life has been an issue with the Shifting, which really has been me going from one Anchor to another, one question to another as to how to judge the TTB I should be. It will always lead to doubt about whether its actually the thing you know best. 
-What's the point of knowing something perfectly (ala Affinity) if its useless against an infinite number of Anchors?! 
== The All-Sufficient Thing: ==
-Which Anchor should we use? All of them!
-Even if Creator wins a certain Anchor, like Affinity, how can you be sure there isn't an even more important anchor just around the corner? 
-Only the A-Ideal specifically can provide answers to all problems. Least-Parts dictates that you dedicate yourself to that thing solely (as in, Category of One!).
-My whole life has been an issue with the Shifting, which really has been me going from one Anchor to another, one question to another as to how to judge the TTB I should be. It will always lead to doubt about whether its actually the thing you know best. 
-What's the point of knowing something perfectly (ala Affinity) if its useless against an infinite number of Anchors?! 
== Adept Tiers: ==
-Be about Theists in particular, but also be about all Adepts. 
-You can always fall back on the other Orders. 
== Can You Know What An Actualized A-Ideal Would Be Like?: ==
-Can you know an actualized Supreme!
>Whatever the Supreme is, It is characterized by Almightiness! That ties It all together and makes It a complete whole! 
== Only Part That Matters is Almightiness: ==
-Almightiness only has one 'part,' the ability to be or do anything. Thus, since It has only one part, and we can know it, it fulfills Affinity. 
-You can know the Actualized Supreme because whatever It is, It is all things ocmbined and Almighty. Whatever the Supreme exists as, It is Almighty, and thus definitive.
>This is enough!
>We can be reasonably sure of secondary things like Oneness, the A-Ideal, etc. But we know that 'It' is Almighty!
-Being Almighty means, practically, we don't have to worry that the Supreme can handle any problems and has no incentive to be evil unduly to us.
-The whole point behind Affinity was not to dedicate your life to that which you didn't know: but if your life is dedicated to the concpet of Almighty, and the Almighty is all things, and we can know Almighty definitely exists, than you can still know for sure what you are dedicated to, and anything you involve yourself in is definitely related to that which you are dedicated too (the Almighty Supreme!)
=== Can't Skewer Concept Of Almightiness: ===
-You can't skewer the definition of Almightiness because it has no definition technically. Definitions are really sets of limitations. Almightiness has no limits!
-Because all concepts are lists of limitations (which is what a definition really is); Theist/Almightiness has the most Affinity because It alone has no limitations, and therefore a totally open definition. You know that you know it correctly because of this!
-While we can' tknow what final form the Supreme has chosen to take; we can know that He is Almighty. That is still something conrete to hold onto and that we know that we definitely know is correct.
-Even if we can't know everything about the Supreme, being able to dedicate to His trait of Amightiness is enough to fulfill Affinity, since we know what we are dedicated to and can also furhter reason other features of the Almighty from Natural Theology.
>Affinity is still upheld, since what we are dedicated to specifically, we know with certainty that our knowing of it is correct.
-
== Further-Parts: Destroys Creators Affinity: ==
-The fullness of the variations behind Creator TTB cannot be known, can be dependent on unseen necessary parts, and thus cannot be fully known.
-The idea of Creator TTB in your head is only Creator in its smallest, most basic form; but it is not the fullness of Creator.
-If the whole point behind Affinity is to know the thing fully, then why divert to Creator?
-There is no real way to prove that even your supposed specific idea of Creator TTB in your head doesn't *somehow* still have unseen parts. Anything is possible!
== Widest-Net Refuted: ==
>How can you be sure the Supreme even likes your Creator TTB? Unless you know what God's TTB, you will never have certainty!
 
== Potence Principle: ==
-Potence is the notion that you should be Theist specifically and make everything immediately about the Supreme because you need to keep a mental focus on Him or else you risk losing your sense of Him when you need it the most (ala The Darkness).
-Affinity was a rabbit hole: you can't know everything even about the TTB concepts in your head, therefore it could end up being always tied to something that ruins it for you! 
>Trying to argue which has more Affinity, Creator or Theist, collapses into parts and confusion. 
>You can't really know the concepts in your head because of the threat of Cosmic-Deceiver, which is negated by God's Benevolence. If you still need the Supreme in order to just know the concepts in your head, why not just stick to Theist alone without tying yourself to further things like the concept of Creator? 
-If you need further reason: Supreme is the All-Sufficient Thing.
-
== Don't Want To Write As Anything Else: ==
-Writing as a Creator character doesn't actually interest me. I want to write as Theists! 
- 
== The Darkness: ==
-The Darkness causes Theist to win the World of Actuality. 
-The Darkness forces you to accept the Supreme, an Actualized Supreme, as existing. So both Creator and Theist start off definitely knowing the object of their attention does exist. 
-The argument that you can know more of Creator, and that the Supreme is distant and vague, is in error. You cannot know the fullness of Creator across all things. Both the Supreme and Creator concept are vague and largely unknowable. 
-If you need to have the Supreme no matter what, thanks to The Darkness, why not concentrate on Him alone then?!
-
=== Only The Supreme Can Beat The Darkness: ===
-Parts adds confusion and we need a one-punch knockout to really beat The Darkness. That is knowledge that a Supreme is Actualized.
-Only the Supreme guarantees existence is infinite in an infinite number of ways, thus truly defeating The Darkness once and for all!
-
=== But At Least You Can Know Creator Exists: Wisdom-Dictates: ===
-The Darkness means Theist starts out knowing its object, an Actualized Supreme, does exist. 
-Of course, there is also the issue of not just having the object exist but also of Affinity, of knowing the object in question. What is the point of following God is He is forever an unknown?
>The A-Ideal answers this. And if you complain that is adding parts, without A-Ideal there is no gaurantee that Creator is the greatest concept in existence. 
>We know the fullness of Theist is the Supreme (by definition) which is beyond any need for evil. But we cannot know the same for Creator. The Fullness of Creator may make all of creator negative for us and there would be nothing we could do. 
-Unless you can know the Supreme is beyond evil, there is no real guarantee that some cosmic deceiver isn't letting you think Creator exists but not really. Or somesuch. Therefore, you needs Theist and its immediate parts like A-Ideal and whatnot, otherwise you have nothing anyway. 
-Macro-Certainty comes before Micro-Certainty: first we need to know a just Supreme exists, then we can work down into the particulars... 
-If you focus on a thing in your head first, you could lose sight of the Supreme and fall to The Darkness, and then you won't have any TTB at all. It's happened before. 
-You cannot see the Fullness of Creator; it is totally possible that the fullness of Creator could be overall bad, and could make all examples of Creator (even the concept in your head) bad, and you just can't see it yet. Just because you have a part of something in your head doesn't mean you trully know it at all. In light of infinity, we can't know everything about anything at all. 
>Theist does not suffer from this 'fullness' question because we know the Supreme exists beyond any need for evil. 
=== Theist Comes With Parts: ===
-Unless you can know the Supreme is beyond evil, there is no real guarantee that some cosmic deceiver isn't letting you think Creator exists but not really. Or somesuch. Therefore, you needs Theist and its immediate parts like A-Ideal and whatnot, otherwise you have nothing anyway. 
-
=== Unless You Focus On Theist, You Could Lose Focus On Supreme & Become Susceptible To Darkness: ===
-Unless you focus on the Supreme, you might lose the mental methods by which you stay in contact with the Supreme. Thus, you could drift away and become vulnerable to The Darkness again.
-Even if you can't know all of the Supreme, it's better than being lost in the Darkness where you can't have any TTB at all!
-
=== All-Sufficient Thing: ===
-There is no inherent guarantee with Creator TTB that Creator can handle any and all potential problems out there. But there is with Theist/Supreme, so why not go with that kind of certainty? 
- 
=== Wisdom-Dictates Refuted: ===
-That 'part' in your head could actually be directly connected to bad things and you wouldn't know. Just because you have a 'part' or concept in your head doesn't truly mean that you know what it actually is! 
-Theist doesn't suffer from this question because we know of the A-Ideal. We know the fullness of Theist is beyond evil. 
-The idea of dedicating yourself to a concept you can fit in your head is a tempting one, but unless you can know for sure that the fullness of that concept is not somehow bad, what's the point of following it then? 
=== What Good Is Certainty Of Finite Parts Against The Darkness: ===
-What good does Wisdom-Dictates do against The Darkness? 
- 
== Being Angry With God: ==
-Blaming God for your life might feel emotionally justified, but its really you not taking on the challenge of Liberty. 
-Dedicate yourself to the Adepts. Theist is your favorite, but you also have fallbacks in case that doesn't pan out? 
== Creator TTB Is Murky: ==
-Creator TTB is murkey and indistinct. You can't know for sure your mind can 'see' all of its parts and in practice it feels vague and way too open. There are a lot of things to be about which don't feel enough of Creator in life! 
- 
== Being About God Is Not Stupid: ==
-It's easy to feel stupid about being Theist, since our world is so cynical, but it's not. 
- 
== Affinity Principle: ==
-Affinity = Affinity is not the same as Certainty; Certainty is about whether a TTBs object actually exists; Affinty is about whether or not you can know it!
-You can never prove that your mind is simply unable to see some 'parts' of Creator TTB. Anything is possible. 
>The whole point behind Creator from the beginning was Affinity. If Creator can't produce perfect Affinity, what's the point?
>Even if you think your own idea of Creator at least exists somewhere in Potential, as one of an infinite number of variations of Creator; you can never be sure that the Supreme or another 3rd party in existence changed everything *somehow* so that all variations of Creator have a hidden part or connection. The point is that Creator TTB can never give total Affinity no matter what.
-The idea in your head seems simple and complete, but it is not complete. It is inherently connected to other things, such as the question of exactly to create. You can't possibly know all of these connections and you can't be sure one of them doesn't ruin it for all. 
>Both Creator and Theist have the problem of the fullness of their object and how much of it you can know.
-The A-Ideal cures the need for Affinity. The Supreme would want to be that one thing which is all things combined (because there would be an infinite number of reasons why all bundled up into the A-Ideal). 
>While Creator seems like its better because you can fit the entirety of the concept of creating in your mind; however, you don't know what that thing is connected to out there. The actual fullness of creator could be bad, and could make all examples of Creator bad, even if you cherry-pick for your own version of creator TTB. That has to at least be possible. 
>Theist has the benefit that its fullness, the Supreme, would be beyond the need for any evil, and could do whatever It wanted without ever having to needlesly harm anyone. However, the fullness of creator could be something different, something less, and so not have that truth to protect it. 
>Just because you can fit the concept of Creator as you understand it into your head, you cannot the fullness of it, all things connected to it, where it leads to, or even all the rammifications of it. In short, it's a trick: Creator concept has the appearance of total Affinity when in reality it does not. 
>Now the same could be said for Theist... except we know that whatever the Supreme is, we resemble It and It has no need for any evil. 
-If you can't know anything of God, than nothing can be known because a Cosmic Deceiver might be in charge of all. Nothing can be known with any certainty at all! No Affinity at all! 
>Theist or bust. 
> 
*Affinity gets to the heart of what Wisdom-Dictates is really about.
***There's also the intellectual issue of not being focused solely on the Supreme leaves you vulnerable to The Darkness!
================
-Affinity = If the Supreme is the A-Ideal, than all things are based off of portions of the Supreme's substance! Everything, all knowledge is of the Supreme! Total and absolute Affinity!
-All of Creation speaks of something of the Supreme. 
-Through the A-Ideal, we can know the Supreme is one thing which is all things combined: therefore, all things speak of Him somehow. 
-Unless you've seen all of Infinity, you can't know what the A-Ideal is!? = Wrong, the A-Ideal is one thing which has all traits of all else, no matter what. The Supreme would want to be this one thing which is all things! 
-You need multiple arguments of Theist in order to justify belief in anything, including Creator TTB. Therefore, don't be afraid to use Theist even if you needs several "parts" at once, such as A-Ideal, Actualized Supreme, Affinity, etc.
-Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity how can you be sure there isn't something actualized that makes all Creator into something else but still have the appearance *somehow*? How can you be sure!
-The A-Ideal is a valid form or answer to Affinity even with parts, for even Creator requires parts ala answering The Darkness. 
-The whole point behind Affinity was that if you dedicated your life to the Supreme, could you truly know anything about Him (Wisdom-Dictates) and the answer is Yes, A-Ideal and Sum of All Knowledge shows that everything tells us something about Him. 
-Unless you know enough about God, you cannot trust that other TTBs even exist, so whether you choose Theist or Creator, you still have to know several parts about God; so why not just stick with Theist alone and simplify things?
-Which do you know more about, Creator or Theist? = The concept in your head may or may not correspond with its supposed actualizations. And The Darkness forces you to need A-Ideal/Supreme, so why not go with that?!
>Finite things are not perfect and dedicating yourself to them could lean to a fullness that is ultimately bad. Theist's fullness is Perfection and beyond the need for Evil. Why while you can know more of Creator in your head, you cannot know where it will lead!
-The problem with Wisdom-Dictates is that it does not show where it ultimately leads!
-What is the point of knowing all of Creator TTB if it causes your sense of the Actualized-Supreme to atrophy and erode, and thus leave you vulnerable to The Darkness!?
-There is no real gaurantee that your conceptualization of CReator TTB is totally accurate. Ergo, Creator is just as vague as Theist is starting off!
-The problem with dedicating yourself to a finite thing is that you will always be worried that something is wrong with it, that there is something better out there, that this will lead to ruin or failure of some kind?
=== Creator TTB Starts Off With Vagueness As Well: ===
-It has to at least be possible that *somehow* your concept of Creator TTB is not the actuall or the fullness of the concept of the Creator TTB. Therefore, both Creator and Theist start off with some vagueness! There is a chance Creator is not what you think it is.
>You may not be able to see all of the A-Ideal/Supreme, but at least we can know that It is whole and complete in and of itself.
>We know the Supreme does exist, whatever It may be.
>The real Creator, fullness of Creator could somehow make all examples of Creator TTB bad, regardless of whatever version you hold to in your head. This has to at least be possible or something doesn't exist!
*Creator TTB is about creating and creating is about existence; but you can't see the whole of existence. It's the same thing with Theist and the Supreme, just different words used!
-Yes you start off knowing the concept in your head completely, but if it has no actualizations, what good is it!?
=== Theist & Affinity: ===
-Creator goes vague in the long-run, can't know what is actualized that counts as Creator. Way too murky to work with. As opposed to Theist which is sharp and distinct.
-Ind. allows you to start off knowing God/Existence is Actualized. Ind. is not complicated and is immediate to the mind. What little argumentation it does require can be compared to Creator TTB and how you need to argue that Creator is about all existence.
>Doing 1+1=2 in your mind is the same level of argumentation that Ind. requires.
-Creator has multiple definitions; Theist doesn't!
-Ind. answers Affinity for Theist!
-Just because Creator has more Affinity than Theist, seemingly, does not mean that Creator TTB doesn't fail at a whole bunch of other Anchors! Only the Supreme can be the All-Sufficient thing!
-Closeness of ACtualization = You can know in your head that actualizations of Creator do exist, but through Ind. you can know that Theist is Actualized as well.
-Real-Life Creator Could Be Bad!
>There is no guarantee that the 'Creator TTB' in your head is the real one, and it has to at least be possible that the real Creator TTB is both bad and makes all examples of Creator somehow bad too!
-Creator TTB In Your Head Is Not The Fullness Of Creator TTB
>There has to be more than what you understand about creating in your head. Therefore, Creator TTB does not in fact have full Affinity. It starts off with vagueness just like Theist does!
>There is no guarantee that the concept of CReator TTB in your head is what the actual Creator TTB is.
>Creator TTB starts off with all sorts of connections that you don't know! Supreme is self-contained!
-Affinity is starting off knowing the fullness of your TTB.
>Creator is about eXistence, but you can't see all of Existence. Therefore, you don't know all of Creator TTB!
>How can you be sure you can 'pick and choose' your version of Creator? you can't!
>
=== Why You Can't Pick & Choose As Creator Either: ===
-You can never be sure that there is something else somewhere in Existence that change what you stand for. Even if you pick and chooe from Existence on what to stand for, you will never be certain that what you have chosen is actually what you think it is.
-You can never be sure your idea of Creator TTB is the actual TTB; something out there could be Actualized which is skewering your mental sight of it; both Theist and Creator start off not truly knowing all the parts or part of their TTB or their object!
>Something actualized in Existence could totally be skewering your mental image of the real Creator TTB and you wouldn't know it!
-Because your idea of Creator TTB could be wrong, the fact that you still have one is meaningless. 
-If you cannot see all of Existence, you cannot know that certain parts are integral to Creator TTB and so your idea of Creator could still be dependent on things you don't know. And because you can't see them, Creator still have the same level of Affinity that Theist does! Starting off!
-You don't know the actual mechanics to how creating works in real-life! Therefore, Creator TTB starts off with the same level or lack of Affinity as Theist does, because you clearly don't see it all even in the original concept in your mind!
=== If All You Have Is The Concepts In Your Head: ===
-If all you have is the concepts in your head, then Creator has already lost. What is the point behind following Creator specifically for Affinity's sake if you don't know if the real Creator is like that at all?
-
=== Further-Parts: You Don't Truly Know How Much You Know: ===
-The idea of Creator TTB in your head clearly isn't enough, there must be further parts unseen by the mind. Therefore this introduces the Unknown after all and thus Creator is imperfect Affinity.
-You know some definitive things about the Supreme as well. 
-If there are furhter parts you don't know of, you can never truly know if you know CReator better or Theist!?
>The concept of Creator in your head, when applied to real-life, may reveal further parts unknown, since you can't positively know that your concept of Creator is all that is needed against all of infinite existence. As such, you can never truly know how much you actually know of Creator. These parts may be necessary to Creator and so cannot simply be ignored!
-
=== Without God, There Is No Knowledge: ===
-Under threat of Cosmic-Deceiver, you must first ascertain that there is a single all-powerful Being beyond any reason for evil. That means you need to know some definitive things about the Supreme just to trust in any knowledge at all!
-Therefore, you cannot have knowledge/Affinity without Theist being present. 
-Trusting that 'anything' or multiple things out there are subject to being beyond evil, leads to parts which ends in confusion. And it also raises the threat that none of them are truly Supreme but together they seem like it!
-Unseen necessary parts is the death of the Affinity argument for Creator.
>Affinity as an Anchor should not be used because you can never be sure what percentge of a thing you actualy know. Since there could be unseen necessary parts. 
=== Unseen Parts Means Actualized Creator CAn't Be Wholly Known Ever: ===
-Also, unseen necessary parts for Actualized Creator is an issue. While all things exist in potential, what if the actualized Creator is the only one you have and its unseen parts are somehow bad? 
-The whole point behind Affinity is to know your TTB, but if you can’t know all of actualized Creator, how doesn’t that automatically fail Affinity as a usable principle? 
-Barring Mind Of God Interefence = God could *somehow* have added parts to all variations of Creator as well! 
-Unseen Necessary Parts = You can never be totally sure that *somehow* your conception of Creator TTB, even existing all by itself, still needs further parts in which to function. How can you prove otherwise?
>Everything is interconnected, therefore eveything is subect to unseen forces that can totally change it!
>How can you say to know al of Creator when you don't know all types of Creating or how Creator TTB sits within greater A-Infinity for sure?
>If your idea of Creator TTB can't have unseen parts, then doesn't that mean there is something that doesn't exist?!
>Do you know if Creator TTB is God's TTB? If you don't know, than there is something inherent about Creator than you don't know, which means no Affinity!
-Affinity is a flawed and bad Anchor!
- 
=== You Can't Actually Be Sure There Isn't More To Creator Concept Your Mind Just Can't See: ===
-You can't be sure there aren't furhter 'parts' to the concept of Creator that you just can't see. Thus nullifying the whole point behind Affinity. 
=== Unless You've Seen All Of A-Infinity, You Can't Have Perfect Affinity: ===
-The relations your TTB has with other things, especially th eActualized ones, could totally change it somehow. 
-Remember, anything is possible! 
=== Actualized Thing Could Be Affecting All Variations Of Creator: ===
-Unless you've seen all of existence, all of A-Infinity; for all you know the Supreme or a 3rd party could be messing with Potential and so even the specific idea of Creator TTB in your head might somehow not be real! 
>The point is - even the concepts in our head don't actually have absolutely-perfect Affinity! 
>Remember, anything is at least possible, including this objection to Creator's Affinity!
>There has to at least be the possibility of something keeping your specific idea of Creator from eisting even in Potential without denying the Supreme full Potential.
>How do you know your idea of Creator isn't actually made of conflicting parts and somehow your minds isn't just being allowed to see that?
>Even if your concept does exist in Potential and you do know it... how do you know it's not evil or destructive when set against the grand backdrop of everything!?
-You can never be sure that there's something meta out there that's affecting all variations of Creator. If its Actualized and its opposites aren't - than all variation of Creator are affected, even those in Potential, thus robbing Creator TTB of its perfect Affinity. 
=== Can't Have Affinity Without Knowing All Of A-Infinity: ===
-Unless you've seen all of Infinity you can't be sure of all traits of any concept, let alone your specific idea of Creator TTB. 
-Something out there could always be affecting it? 
- 
=== CAn't Know Where It Leads Too: ===
-What if your specific idea of Creator TTB always leads to something bad? Like diverting away from the Supreme? 
-If you don't know for sure the natural end-goal of a concept when put into action, do you truly have Affinity? 
-The ramifications of a thing are also its parts, and if you don't know them, than you don't know all of its parts! 
-Both Theist and Creator have vagueness, but with the Supreme yu know He is beyond evil. What is Creator TTB can lead to evil even sometimes? 
-If you don't know its ramifications - than what else don't you know about it? This kills Affinity. 
=== Unseen Parts: ===
-You can never truly prove that any concept of Creator, even the specific one in your head, doesn't have Unseen Parts your mind just can't see. 
-How do you know the parts of that concept you hold in your head don't naturally intermingle to produce these unseen parts? How can you be ever sure!?
-
=== Further-Parts: ===
-Further Parts = Every concept is composed of other concepts, which are composed of other concepts, etc... thus annihilating Affinity.
>For us mere mortal, Affinity is always relative.
=== Asking Questions Reveals U Don't Know Creator TTB At All: ===
*If you can't explain it all, you don' tknow it all! 
-Proof Creator TTB Does Not Grant Total Affinity:
>What is the end-goal or end-result of total creating?
>Does Creator bring you to God or avert away from Him at times?
>Does Creator cover everything or is it one of many ways of being about existence?
-If your undestanding of a TTB can't answer all questions about it, you have imperfect Affinity!
-If your conception of any TTB cannot answer important questions about how it is or functions, than you idea is not the wholeness of that concept!
-Asking questions is how you destroy Creator TTB's sense of total Affinity!!!
-
=== Cosmic-Deceiver Wins Affinity For Theist: ===
-The only thing we can truly know is the Almighty Supreme Itself, and to trust in Its goodness, otherwise a Cosmic Deceiver could be deceiving our minds and we could dedicate our lives to something that is not real after all! Human logic is finite! (or something else that is epistemologically bad).
>This is the true answer to (and culmination of) the principle of Affinity. Cosmic Deceiver itself makes any other concept untenable as per Affinity other than the Supreme Itself! Supreme would want Itself to be known!
>You can never be sure you know all of any concept, and that something in that which you don't know is actually changing its nature without your mind seeing that!
>The only feature of the Supreme we can know with certainty is that He is Almighty. But that is going to have to be enough - because nothing else, not even individual concepts, can be known with 100% certainty either. Any individual concept can actually be something else and we just can't see that. No matter what. All things are possible! Only God's goodness is a light in this metaphysical darkness!
*You can never be sure a Cosmic-Deceiver isn't playing games with your mind; the Supreme only has a real incentive to make sure we all know Itself, hence the goodness of the Supreme safeguards knowlege of the Supreme but not other concepts we can know.
*Cosmic-Deceiver answer Affinity in favor of Theist!
------
-What's easier: to trust that multiple entities are above any evil or trust that the one Supreme Thing is above all evil?
-Only the Supreme is beyond any and all evil.
-There is an infinite amount of evil that must be possible for higher beings, otherwise there is something that doesn't exist. In fact of that, do you want to trust in a general Great Hope or one specific to the Supreme!?
-It is no small irony that you can never know whether the higher ups other than Supreme are still susciptle to evil or not - thus violating the spirit of Affinity itself. We can know the Supreme exists beyond evil because He is fully self-sustained: but what of other things?
-The Trick of Affinity is that Creator TTB seems to be more knowable, since its just a concept and not a concept and an actualization; however, you can never be sure of a Cosmic-Deceiver. However, a Supreme would be all about Itself, and would want Itself to be known!
-Unless you know all the higher ups (at least the ones above you) are beyond evil, it seems better to place hope in the Supreme alone!
-The only cure for Cosmic-Deceiver problem is the Supreme which alone exists beyond any need for Evil, and would want Itself to be known.
-Can you prove as Creator TTB that there isn't a Cosmic-Deceiver for sure!? Even if accidentally!?
-Creator is the illusion of Affinity that actually causes you to move away from it!
=== The Only Concept We Can Know Is The Supreme!: ===
-As Creator TTB you cannot prove that there is no Cosmic-Deceiver above you. Theist has the Supreme which can be showed t have an incentive to make Itself known.
-If you have to hope that your TTB exists in a different form and is positive, how is that not an automatic failure of Affinity?!
-Somethings about God are immediate and can be known concretely. That is enough for Affinity. We can extrapolate from them. 
-Unseen versions are just that - unseen, and therefore outside the principle of Affinity.
-Unseen versions may be positive but not by much. 
-Unseen Versions, set in the totality of A-Ifninity, may be so radically different from your original conception that any TTB label you use is stretched to breaking!
-Also, what if there are more negative than positive unseen versions? What if its better to just not use that TTB in the long run?
-Concete Parts of God = Somethings about God are immediate and so can be known with certainty. It may not be perfect but it fulfills Affinity, especially in light of Cosmic-Deceiver.
-Your version of Creator may be inherently flawed in multiple ways and the nearest 'positive' versions is so far removed that its totally different. 
-What if there is an actualized demigod of all versions of Creator and he's an asshole? It doesn't matter what version of 'Creator' there is then!?
>This scenario right here proves that Unseen Variations does not work against the potential evils of A-Infinity.
-
=== -Final Answer on Affinity: ===
-Concepts can't actually be known because of Cosmic-Deceiver; Potential is but one of many possible 'realities' out there, and the only knowledge that is protected is that about God.
>There has to be something that cane *somehow* fuck with the concept of Creator in any variation within Potential, or there is something that doesn't exist!
-only Protected Knowledge wins Affinity!
=== -Protected Knowledge. ===
>Only protected knowledge (knowledge about the Supreme) is safe from anything within A-Infinity as long as the Supreme says so.
-Protected Knowledge is more than just Affinity: there must be an infinite number of other bad things that come of knowledge out there. In order for any knowledge to be protected from that, the Supreme must intentionally be protecting it.
-Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity you'll never be sure something out there doesn't still *somehow* spoil Creator TTB and all its variations!
-Creator relies on the data of itself being in Potential: which means that Creator relies on Potential. But we don't know what role Potential really plays in the grand scheme of things? So relying on it ultimately loses Affinity anyway!
>Neither Creator nor Theist can truly be said to be known 100%!
-Micro-Certainty is dependant on Macro-Certainty!
-
=== Destroying-Questions: ===
-If you ask specific questions about your own specific idea of Creator TTB and you can't answer them, than you don't know it!
-Is your idea of Creator the nature of the Supreme? That is not open to infinite-variation, either it is or it isn't!
-If you can't know everything about anything than Affinity cannot be a standlone Anchor!
-
=== All-Sufficient Thing Beats Affinity: ===
-You'll always keep wondering if there's another, somehow more important Anchor out there than Affinity!
-Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity, how ca you be sure there isn't a more important Anchor than Affinity?
=== Affinity Notes: ===
-Relying on variations of your idea of Creator is still a violation of Affinity. You can't possibly know what else is involved or what's different about that variation of your TTB!
-You may not know everything about the Supreme, but Almightiness can be known to exist for sure. Thanks to Cosmic-Deceiver, you can truly know nothing of Creator at all!
>For all you know, your idea of Creator TTB and it sparts could immediately lead to great evil, but your mind isn't being allowed to realize that. How can you prove otherwise?
-Even if you can't know all of the Supreme, the Supreme is not an inert concept but a living being, why would He want to cause evil without cause? Wouldn't that be a failure on His part?
-Theist wins Affinity because Theist at least has Almightiness which you can know, understand, has only one 'part,' and definitely exists as you know it. Creator has this too but is susceptible to Cosmic-Deceiver, where else Theist has a reason not to be.
-
=== How Cosmic-Deceiver Kills Affinity: ===
-The idea of Creator in your head could lead to different things and thus be different from what you think: something could be messing iwth your mind's sight of it.
-While this might be Protected Knowledge, it would surely not be as protected by the Supreme as much as knowledge of the Supreme Itself.
-At the very least, if there is such a thing as Protected Knowledge, it would be knowledge of the Supreme!
-
=== Almightiness Alone Is Fulfilment of Affinity! ===
>Only Amightiness can be known in its entirety for sure!
-
=== Almightiness Is Atualized, All Of Creator Is Not: ===
-You know Theist can handle anything right now; but your specific idea of Creator TTB (and any backup variation your counting on) may be impossible to be actualized. Maybe the Supreme won't ever allow it? Who knows. Why devote yourself to a TTB that may or may not be able to accomplish what you need when Theist is already capable of anything?
-
== Foe Of All Evil: ==
-Whatever your Definition of The Darkness is; only a Supreme can give certainty against all potential evils out there.
-You don't need to know al of the Supreme only that He is, that He is infinitely good (because He has no reason to be evil) and that he is protection against all things bad. And that He sees something of Himself in you. 
-Least-Parts demands you dedicate your life to that thing lest you lose sight of it.
>Wisdom dictates that that which is supremely important should warrant sole dedication for the threat of losing it is greater than the value of anything else.
== Doesn't Have To Be Good Or Involved: ==
-God doesn't have to be 'good' or involved in the world for you to have to be Theist. Beating The Darkness requires knowledge of the Supreme's existence, not for the Supreme to be involved in our world. 
-
== Wisdom-Dictates Refuted: ==
-While you can fit the concept of creating in your head, you cannot see the Fullness of Creator. 
-Without seeing all of A-Infinity, how can you be sure the fullness of Creator, all things of Creator combined, wont total into something that ruins Creator TTB for you? How can you know for sure that isn't so!
 *The problem with Wisdom-Dictates is that you can't know everything about everything. How can you prove, beyond doubt, that there isn't something that can somehow ruin ALL of Creator TTB for you? Every single example of creator? Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity, how can you know for sure!
== You Can't Know What Form An Actualized A-Ideal Would Take: ==
-Doesn't matter. Whatever that form(s) is, that's the object of Theist TTB.
-Advanced knowledge of the A-Ideal can be achieved via Natural Theology.
>Advanced knowledge of the A-ideal is inevitable and necessary: the Great Hope is a weak defense against the Darkness, the more you know about the A-IdealSupreme, the better and easier you defeat the Darkness!
-We know that something that is Almighty exists and that Almightiness has only one part, the ability to do or be anything. 
-The A-Ideal is the foundation of existence, extensive knowledge of It will be necessary anyway. Otherwise, you are consigning yourself to ignorance.
-But we know a Supreme does exist and that It specificlly defeats the Darkness, and we should stick to the Supreme sepcifically because of entropy. We don't want to lose sight of the Supreme and thus become susceptible to the Darkness! 
== Category of One: ==
-The Darkness makes Wisdom-Dictates pointless, since God must be real and held closely no matter what.
-Ergo, the question will arise as to what TTB God Himself would want. That leads to the A-Ideal, which leads to Aim of the A-Ideal, and thus Category of One.
-The Supreme would only want a TTB that creates a category of just one object, the Object of Itself.
-
== The Darkness: ==
-The Darkness wins out against all other ideas of an Anchor. 
>I don't want to be anything else other than Theist for fear of accidentally wandering away from the A-Ideal and thus being vulnerable to The Darkness!
>Only a Supreme can defeat The Darkness, and there can be only one Supreme!
-The Darkness keeps you Theist! 
-The Darkness feeds on uncertainty. Creator TTB requires God to be Creator in nature specifically, which helps to bring confusion and feed The Darkness. 
*Unless you are specifically Theist, your metaphysics might atrophy and you could become lost to the Supreme when The Darkness attacks! 
== Wisdom-Dictates!: ==
-Wisdom dictates you base your life on that which is most certain. However, The Darkness shows that only the Supreme can truly be known for certain!
>Because the Supreme alone can give any kind of certainty, therefore It alone be known with absolute certainty. 
>Host of Problems - Certainty is protection against threat, only the Supreme can take on all possible threats and win because It is all things already.
>Ind. and Intelligent-Design can both be done in your head, making Theist just as Immediate as Creator is!
>Least-Parts also dictates that you base your life on one thing (object), in order to avoid confusion in times of metaphysical distress. 
>
=== Further Notes: ===
-You Can't Know Everything About Anything
>Not against the backdrop of Infinity!
>So you can fit the concept of Creator into your head? How do you know there isn't something in Infinity that will counter that and make it go bad!?
>There goes your Least-Parts argument! You'll need all of Infinity to ensure Creator Concept is actually what you think it is!
=== -What To Be In World Of Actualization: ===
>Actualizaiton is all about Certainty and Truth; the greatest truth is the A-Ideal. And an Actualized Supreme is the only thing that can give Certainty.
>It's not that an Actualized Supreme gives one Certainty among many, but that an AS is the only thing that gives any Certainty. There is no Certainty without AS and none besides.
Wisdom-Dictates:
-Found your life on that which is most Certain, but the only thing that gives true Certainty or really any Certainty at all is actually an Actualized Supreme. Nothing else will substitute. >The Darkness reaffirms this!
>
=== >Wisdom-Dictates vs The Darkness: ===
-There are many types of Certainty, only an Actualized Supreme can provide them all!
-Under extreme doubt (like the Darkness) even Creator requires argumentation. It is not immediate like you think.
-Without the Supreme, there is no Certainty. Least-Parts dictates you dedicat yourself to that thing alone then and work from there, since only that gives actual Certainty. 
-How do you know you aren't being deceived? You don't. You need an Actualized, Benevolent Supreme to guarantee against that. 
-Cerainty is protection against threats. Creator and things of Creator actualized may be immediate in this reality, but how do you knwo there aren't things out there can somehow mess them all up? You can't. Only an Actual Supreme is immune to all threats, both seen and unseen. 
-It is the unseen threats that cancel out Creator and its immediacy.
-Certainty = Immediacy + Least-Parts = Actualized Supreme
-So Creator has immediacy, how can you be sure that's the TTB that the Actualized Supreme wants!
-World of Potential has proven what the Actualized Supreme would want you to be!
-Knowing you chose the right TTB, that is itself a type of Certainty too! Creator doesn't answer it at all!
-Wisdom-Dictates that you base your life on that which is most Certain, but several things can be known with certainty to exist. Both Creator and Theist require argumentation.
-Without an Actualized Supreme, there can be no Certainty possible. Therefore, that is what you can be most Certain of, for the simple rason that no certainty is possible otherwise. Creator may not last forever, it could die one day unless there is a Supreme to dictate reality.
-Immediacy is a trap: there is no guarantee of things lasting without an Actualized Supreme.
-Step-stonning from Creator to a Supreme violates Least-Parts and adds confusion. What if the Supreme doesn't want that!
-Wisdom Dictates you put faith in that which is most certain, but only that which can grant Certainty can be certainly known.
-Wisdom-Dictates vs The Darkness!
-
 -Host of Problems = Only a Supreme can gaurantee protection against all infinitely possible threats an therefore alone gives Certainty. Creator can connect to Supreme but only through Argumentation. 
-If the Almighty does exist, Aim of the A-Ideal kicks in!
-Nothing is immediately certain = how can you be sure anything of Creator will exist forever?
-Creator has the appearance of being most Certain, bu tmust always fall bak on an Actualized Supreme. Therefore, it is actually an Actualized Supreme that is most Certain, as counterintuitive as that might be. 
-The actual thing that stops doubt is what you are most Certain of. If Creator keeps needing a Supreme, than it is the Supreme you are certain of. 
-
== But We Can Know For Sure Creator Exists: ==
-Sum of all Knowlege = Variation of God that does exist!
-Existence is also real, and is immediate. Ind. and Least-Parts makes this more Certain than Creator does!
-Existence Actually Exists
>Existence, as proven by Ind., is real and infinite and is a substance unto itself. We move through it and have our being through it, and it possesses the traith and potential of all things.
-Theist has Supremacy but Creator has Certainty:
>Not really, Creator is a vague and nebulous thing and we don't even know the wholeness of it! How can you prove we won't one day find something out about Creator that makes it all undesirable to be about?
-Only An Actualized Supreme Gives Any Certainty At All.
>Creator could die one day, the whole concept and everything related to it. Anything is possible.
>If you need a Supreme anyway, for only a Supreme can stand against all possible threats, than why not dedicate to that Supreme alone out of Least-Parts?
>
== Wisdom-Dictates!: ==
-You Can't Know Everything About Anything
>Not against the backdrop of Infinity!
>So you can fit the concept of Creator into your head? How do you know there isn't something in Infinity that will counter that and make it go bad!?
>There goes your Least-Parts argument! You'll need all of Infinity to ensure Creator Concept is actually what you think it is!
-What To Be In World Of Actualization:
>Actualizaiton is all about Certainty and Truth; the greatest truth is the A-Ideal. And an Actualized Supreme is the only thing that can give Certainty.
>It's not that an Actualized Supreme gives one Certainty among many, but that an AS is the only thing that gives any Certainty. There is no Certainty without AS and none besides.
Wisdom-Dictates:
-Found your life on that which is most Certain, but the only thing that gives true Certainty or really any Certainty at all is actually an Actualized Supreme. Nothing else will substitute. >The Darkness reaffirms this!
>
== Certainty + Least-Parts = Theist: ==
-The only thing that gives Certainty is an Actualized, Benevolent Supreme. Least-Parts means that that should be the only foundation of your life.
-Winning the world of Actualization means Certainty first and Supremacy second.
-Ideas in the head can die or not be true to begin with. We need an Actualized, Benevolent Supreme.
-If your Concept needs a Supreme to back it up anyway in the long-run that is Aeternity, why not just dedicate to the Supreme for Least-Parts sake?
-Creator TTB cannot defeat The Darkness on its own, only Theist TTB can! That is true certainty!
-
=== Further Notes: ===
-Only an Actualized-Supreme can ever give any kind of Certainty at all. (Nothing else can substitute for this. Otherwise, all could collapse at any moment, never to rise again.)
-Ind. proves Almighty, while Intelligent-Design proves Intelligence. Together the two prove a Being that can and would want to be the A-Ideal!
-
== So You Can Fit Creator Concept In Your Head, Can You Do Same For All Existence?: ==
-Creator as a concept is defined as serving Existence, but you can't see all of Actualized (Fullness) of Existence. Ergo, how can you be sure there won't be something that totaly changes the nature of Creator once activated?!
-If this argument applies to Ind., than it does also to Creator TTB!
-How do you know there isn't something in the fullness of Existence that when actualized will somehow ruin Creator? After all, you haven't seen all of Existence!
=== Further Notes: ===
-Can you fit all of God inside your head?
>Isn't the whole point behind the A-Ideal to have God in a conceptual form!?
-Concepts in your head can just be a lie!
>Which is why you need a Benevolent Supreme.
-Intelligent-Design plus Ind. prove a Creator who is Almighty!
-God Is Existence Argument = Existence is intelligent as per Intelligent-Design and is Almighty as per Ind. That is all you need for something to decide to be the A-Ideal! 
>Why add argmentation by asking 'what caused existence' or 'how do you know existence is casaul' when Existence by all rights is probably Itself the FBE!
-Believing the stuff in your head is real is just as much an act of faith as believing in God.
-Why be Theist? Because its the one that won the World of Potential! The A-Ideal makes it clear that the Thing-To-Be is Theist!
-The only thing that gives Certainty is a Benevolent Supreme! Concept could die one day, and another supreme culd have an entirelydifferent system to it. Why not?!
-Completely knowing something may not be the only variable in deciding upon a TTB! There are others, like is that TTB the nature of the A-Ideal or the one desired by the A-Ideal?
-
== Wisdom Dictates: ==
-There's no point in holding to a simple concept if you have to constantly hold to the Supreme anyway. That adds parts, actually, and instead increases doubt!
-There is no certainty if there is an 'Evil God' no matter how well some TTB or concept fits in your head. You need to know the Supreme, so why add parts by also being about a concept that could potentially be different from God!?
== Further Notes About Ind. & FBE: ==
-Creator TTB cannot stand against The Darkness. This has been proven in actual experience. 
-We cannot know everything about Ind. but ultimately what matters is that Existence is Infinite, that It must have a cause, and that cause is Almighty. And Intelligent. 
-We have already ascertained that Existence is infinite via Ind. At the very least there is something that exists that is infinite in scope. 
-That something is infused with casuality (ie, cause and effect), since all things exist and move around by being within It. Therefore, this infinite-spaciality/Ind./Existence has not always existed all by itself for no real reason. It must have a reason. 
> 
*Also remember the lesson of the Unmoved Mover.
>If Casuality is inherent within Ind., than all things must have a cause, because Ind. covers all things. We know this because Infinity-Below proved Infinte-Above, and that Ind. goes forever outward. It already crosses four 'dimensions' (length, width, height and time) of reality so why not all of them!
>How can we be sure Ind. truly covers everything? = The idea that Infinite-Above is excluded by potentially other dimensions or something similar fails to take into account Infinity-Below. Such things would have to exist in the infinite reaches of Infinite-Below as well, and yet they are clearly included, so they would be too for Infinite-Above. 
>Anything that is capable of creating infinitely can create anything, can Actualize any part of Potential, and therefore by definition is Almighty. 
-Intelligent-Design shows Intelligence on the part of whatever built Reality itself. 
>That somethings exist Actualized and others don't does itself show intent and design! 
-All that is necessary to prove A-Ideal is Actualized is evidence of an Almighty something that is Intelligent, so that It could choose to be the A-Ideal. If that thing cannot do so, than it cannot be Almighty at all. 
-
== Notes About FBE Being Almighty & Intelligent: ==
-Infinite scope and infinite capacity of creating equals Almightiness.
>Energy can be made into anything, since we can see that energy forms all known things in our own universe and look at all the variety! As a coder can build any program using code, a Being that can create reality itself can use unlimited energy to form any reality It desires. >How do we know Infinite-Scope of creating? How do we know the FBE can actualize any portion of Potential that It wants too? Because the FBE has already demonstrated that It can create infinitely in terms of spatiality, and has already created several different types of things within our own universe; hence, It can keep creating different types of things ad infinitum.
-All things exist within Potential,an infinite number of variations, and the capacity for Potential is inherent within Existence. Obvious to the mind.
-Intelligent-Design = The FBE has clearly created a complex universe, pointing to intelligence on Its part. Even if we live in a simulated universe, whoever put us here must be the product of a complex universe.
>A complex simulation is itself proof of a complex parent 'real' world universe.
>If intelligence arises out of relatively nothing with no real effort, than the FBE would be intelligent too simply because why not. If intelligence is the product of complexity, complexity points to intelligence on the part of the Creator.
>Intelligence by itself is complex, something we can know because we all have it, and complexity points to an orchestrated origin, thus clearly indicating Intelligent Design, and all Intelligent Design leads back to an initial Intelligence.
>Mortal creaturs can only exist in pockets of un-Actualization, something which doesn't make sense in light of an allmighty FBE. Why would an FBE create anything at all besides just being Itself? If The FBE is doing anything than just existing as pure existence all by Itself,that indicates willfullness to create mortal things. 
>Whatever consciousness is, it arises from nature, and so is inherent in nature. 
>The best argument for the FBE having sentience is the concept of complexity. The fact that anything other than the FBE in its perfect state exists implies complexity and thus design. 
>Ind. shows that the FBE is Almighty, which means that It is fully Actualized-Potential, and thus possses the fullness of consciousness already! 
>Since creation is actualization, which is obvious to the mind because we ourselves do it all the time; the FBE draws only upon Itself to create, and so by creating sentience thus proves that It has sentience actualized to begin with. 
>If we do exist in a simulation made by other mortal beings in an alien universe, that universe must be complex beause building a simulation like this is super-complex! And complexity always leads back to the notion of Design! 
-Fearing hte Mind of God = Aim of the A-Ideal
-Anchor should be Ind.
-Eternal-Principle Refuted = Can't be sure this is the correct concept, could it be lacking something and therefore lead to errenous behavior?
-
=== What Loyalty Does The TTB Generate?: ===
-Etymology Matters: It generates mindset, which is the whole pointbehind TTB. Creator makes you loyal to all objects, but the A-Ideal is principally only loyal to Itself. 
=== Further Notes: ===
-Connectivity-Overload = When you're Theist but there's too much to connect with. Use your Chapter to prioritize what to be about over other available objects.
>By the way, this isn't the same as Only-Half.
-Why be Theist?:
>Becasue being all about God gives you God and God's Stuff, which means having immediate access to all things. That is itself the ultimate reason to be Theist TTB specificlly.
>The whole point behind seeking out the best TTB was to fulfill the question of what to be about. It was decided that to determine the best TTB, that which gives access to all of infinite. Creator suffers from Only-Half, the Adepts as a TTB in general lack an identity, but Theist gives access to all and still lets you focus primarily on just one (necessary) Object.
>Only by being about the Supreme specifically can you gain access to all of Infinity. And Infinity is the Anchor.
-Only the Supreme specifically can beat The Darkness. There is no other evil besides The Darkness, for the Darkness is all negative stuff in existence.
-Future-Insurmountable:
-
-Future-Insurmountable proves Theist above all other TTBs, while Only-Half destroys Creator.
-If the nature of the A-ideal is only to be about Itself, it stands your TTB should make you feel principal loyalty only to God and no other objects. But Creator makes you care about all things of creating. 
-Aim of the A-Ideal is the nature of the A-Ideal, not Creator. Creator is about all creating, Theist is about the Self-Creating of the A-Ideal. There is a difference and it show sup in the mind-set that each TTB produces. 
>Creator is also about just one aspect of God, while Theist is about all of them. 
>The nature of A-Ideal is to be about A-Ideal, for that is all that It needs to be about. Nature equals what something is about. However, Creator is etymologically about all creating, and there must be other sources of creating at least in potential, so Creator is not specific to A-ideal since you can be Creator apart from A-Ideal! These other sources of creating must be at least equal to A-Ideal in 'owning' the concept of Creator or else there is something that doesn't exist! They are other pinnacles of creating too! 
*While there is only one Pinnacle of Existence (A-Ideal), the Creator TTB must be about all Creating or else it is not Creator TTB; including these other sources of creating that exist in Potential. Thus, Creator is not specific enough to the A-Ideal. 
*Etymology matters = Creator TTB is defined as being about creating, which means all Objects, not just the Object of the A-Ideal! That is very similar to A-Ideal but not Perfection! 
*If Creator is not about all object, than it is not about some creatings, which is contradictory. But the AotA dictates that the perfect TTB is only about the Object of the A-Ideal. These are different definitions and so are two different things! 
*The Fullness of Creator-Category is all creatings, which makes its parameters beyond that of the A-ideal's only Object! 
*If you can switch out the A-ideal for another existence to be ACtualized and still be Creator, than you are not just about the Object of the A-Ideal!
*For instance, you can create gimped Creator-Sources which can still produce anything but are not true equals to A-Ideal. That would allow you to be Creator while being wholly free from A-Ideal! 
-Aim of the A-Ideal is a fully-fleshed out nature in its own right. Creator keeps pretending like its vacous but its not. 
-Other sources of creating must exist in potential besides A-Ideal. Hence, Creator is not truly specific to A-Ideal in the realm of potential. 
-
-
-Indivisability Vs Least-Parts
>Ind. proves an FBE because the Fullness of Potential exists within our reality as well, meaning the FBE has already created all things in Potential.
 >It's just one more step to see that the FBE would want to be the A-Ideal and that gives us Theist.
 >Many things are certain; the question is which is both certain and supreme or the closest we can get. Creator as a Concept alone can't do that, you need the A-Ideal and FBE!
>
-The Darkness Proves Pragmatic-Certainty:
>Creator as a Concept can't do shit against the Darkness. Unless you've proven an FBE and that they are benevolent, the Darkness will take out any TTB regardless of how good it is on its own merit.
 >
-Certainty of Supremes / Which Certainty Matters Most
>There are many Certainties, what matters most is Certainty of that which is Supreme. Therefore, prove the A-Ideal and FBE and nothing else is needed!
>Without the Supreme, or whatever is 'in charge,' there is no hope for anything. All concepts can be changed and disappear forever at the whim of whatever is in charge!
-Certainty of Lastingness
-
-Transference of Attributes
>Without the Attributes List, as Creator TTB you will never be able to connect with God or the concept of God because of the finnegling doubt that Creator is not the supreme concept to be His nature!
-Only FBE Gives Any Certainty At All
>Therefore, your TTB should startwith being founded on the FBE.
-The Quest for Certainty ends with Least-Parts, with that one part being the FBE. Nothing else gives any Certainty at all!
-Certainty Before Supremacy (Theist)
-Creator's Trick
>Put the Concept of Creator before the FBE! Don't fall for it!
-Desire For Singularity
>I want to be only about one thing. Least-Parts. Creator is about a plethora of things, all that is in the category of creator, far less than Theist.
-
-Tweaky-Theology = The Object of Theist is God, and maybe anything else if He *happens* to want that. Theist is about spending eternity striving to know more about that. 
>But what's important is Future-Insurmountable. No one wants to dedicate their life to a TTB that has error and so could hurt people. 
>A Supreme must exist, so we will always need Him if for no other reason than the Darkness. 
>But Creator has no inhrent gaurantee against Future-Insurmountable. 
>A Supreme would need nothing but to be about Himself, so that TTB is gauranteed for eternity, since God Himself is perfect. Any 'add ons' if they exist can be affixed later if the Supreme so desires. 
>The idea being that the Supreme would not actualize any truth that makes Theist TTB become negative. 
>Tweaky-Theology is trying to adapt Theist to Widest-Net! 
>The point of Theist TTB isn't knowing God's full TTB at once, but merely knowing that is the TTB that is immune to Future-Insurmountable, and forever striving to know more of what that TTB is. 
>There is a Supreme and His TTB is the right one. That's what matters.
>What is the point of having Widest-Net if it can be canncelled out by Future-Insourmountable?
>
-Future-Insurmountable can work against Widest-Net, but it needs a stronger sense of the Supreme's TTB.
>Whatever the Supreme's TTB is, that's Theist TTB. Being Theist means spending the rest of eternity tryin to learn more about God and to know what this is. 
>
-Foundational-Truths:
>What if the TTB keeps changing?
>We have several important questions that need to be answered definitively in order to have a stable and lasting TTB. WE therefore need Theist, since only God can be the answer to the questions of Foundational-Truth.
>
-Only-Half:
>The Supreme is necessary already, thanks to The Darkness. Theist TTB is the True Widest-Net!
>Creator in theory is about all of existence, but in practice only allows you to be about half of existence, that half that is definitively or strongly associated with creating or full existence.
>In practice, you struggle to associate with things not strongly of Creator, especially if they are tied to Destroyer. Theist and the attending Names let you be about all things at once, which is what Widest-Net is about!
-After all, all of infinite can be divided between God and God's stuff.
>
-Act Of Creating Owns All Concepts?
>Maybe, maybe not. Creator can change itself, but if it changes itself to posses all things, will it still be Creator afterwards? 
>Also, there has to at least be the possibility that there is something(s) out there that Creator can't somehow posses even if it can create anything and everything. Otherwise there is something that doesn't exist.
>Creator could just be one of many equals somehow, all of which 'own' the rest of A-Infinity by want of their own special process or power. 
>Only the A-Ideal has full Incorporation, possessing all things!
-Incorporation
>There can be only one full Incorporation and that has to be A-Ideal. Trying to argue its inner-part(s) just leads to parts and thus the Shifting eventually.
-Indivisability 
>The Force-Behind-Existence can be whatever It wants, so worrying about other factors is pointless. The only factor a Supreme would consider is the concept of the A-Ideal!
>The A-Ideal is meant to be the fullness of Incorporation by want of the idea behind it as a concept, therefore It alone is the Supreme of the world of ideas and not the concept of Creator.
>
-Indivisability:
>The primary takeaway of Ind is that there is something out there can create an infinite something. Anything that can create infintely can create or do anything and so is the Supreme. It would be only what It wanted to be, which would be the A-Ideal!
>Anything that can create infinitely in any way must have infinite potential to actualize, and if It can create infinitely in one way, why not another, and another, and another...
>Because Potential is a real thing, and anything exists in Potential, and Existence or whatever made it covers all things: therefore the Force Behind Existence is capable of all of Potential. 
>Unlimited energy plus the fullness of Potential means that the Force-Behind-Existence can create or do anything in Potential (which is all things, making It the Supreme).
>Whatever can create an infinite reality means It already posses the power to alter and create reality; plus It has unlimited energy. Therefore, It can create any reality and alter it at will.
>We know that anything exists in Potential already, Potential is Actualized via energy, and the Force-Behind-Existence has already been shown to be able to create or alter reality itself. Those three concepts effectively prove that whatever can create infinitely as per Ind. must be the Supreme!
>Remember that Reality and Potential are effectively the same thing. If the A-Ideal/Force-Behind-Existence can create or alter reality, that de facto means It can alter or create from all of Potential.
>If all things already exist in terms of Potential within our reality, than they are a part of Existence. And the Force-Behind-Existence as well.
>The Force-Behind-Existence clearly has the power to Actualize, and we know all things exist in Potential even if they only exist in potential in our one reality. If the FBE has unlimited energy, It can Actualize all of Potential, which would mean It can do anything thus making It the Supreme!
>The FBE definitely has the power to Actualize because before our segment of existence even existed, it existed in potential. Also, actualization happens all the time in our reality, so where did that come from if the FBE doesn't have that inherent within Its nature?
>
-No such thing as a False Name of God, just an Incomplete Name.
-
-Totality? 
>Is Variations of God the wholeness of the Internal-Action of the A-Ideal? Can you truly be sure without knowing all of the A-Ideal?
>
-Specific Creator
>The A-Ideal explores only the Object of Itself, not all of A-Infinity! 
>The A-Ideal doesn't explore multiple objects, just the Object of Itself. Therefore, the TTB must have Immediacy. 
>
Object, Not Category
>Because you are either immediately about the Object of the A-Ideal or you are not! 
>Creator Categroy includes more than just God. The nature of the A-Ideal is to be only about the Object of Itself. 
-
-The thought of multiple attributes, all must line up, will never allow you tobe Creator and connect concretely with God.
-There could be other Actions of Pontential which would mean that Creator as a concept has peers. These other Actions could also be capable of reproducing anything else. Creator could just be a segment of an infinite scale of possible Actions for Potential.
-You don't even know all of Creators attributes! Can you list them? Of course not, and that will always cause immediate doubt!
-Creator seems certain, but when inspected, is actually a nebulous term! As most Concepts really are!
-Creator is ACtualization which is Potential, but how can you be sure that Potential is universal to A-Infinity? You don't.
-
-Always Parts Unknown = If it isn't possible for Creator as a concept to still have parts your finite mind doesn't know about, than there is something that doesn't exist!
>Besides, do you know all the infinite diffrent types of creating specifically? Than there Creator as a concept does have parts unknown!
-Knowing That He Knows Better.
-The Only Thing that grants certainty is an almighty sentient being!
-the mind's eye can see that God loves us
-Unbound - There are no laws or external factor or internal factors that 'control' God. He is Almighty and so exists and does whatever He wishes too. Therefore, the only real Certainty comes from a Benevolent Sentient Almighty Being!
-
-What Does God Want Us To Be?
>God's nature is not limited to any single action. He is Creator and Destroyer both. But the A-Ideal, as per Aim of the A-Ideal, is only about Itself. That idea is the concept that is Theist. To be primarily about God alone.
-Object of Attention = The A-Ideal Object of Attention, what It is all about, is Itself. Your TTB must therefore always be about this object first, and everything else second. Creator does not do that, therefore it is disqualified.
-Worrying About TTB
>We can never be totally sure of God's exact internal nature.
>There is no guarantee that the human-concieved notion of Creator perfectly aligns with everything about the A-Ideal's monodominant substance.
>The problem with Transference of Attributes is that we do not know all of the A-Ideal attributes, therefore we can never be totally sure which concept we know of is truly the concept/nature of the A-Ideal!
>There really is no gaurantee that humans are given access to the concept with the list of attributes identical to A-Ideal . You must always assume that our closest concept or idea to the nature of the A-Ideal is merely the closest approximation.
>
-Immediate Certainty
>You can hold the entirety of a concept in your mind, you can't do that with God.
-Existential Distance Gives Parts
-Starting Off Principle
>Ind. alone does not answer all questions. Certainty comes in several forms. The question is whether you start out with Creator or Theist and than move from there to these other principles as needed. But remember, Creator starts off by being obviously real and existing, which Theist doesn't!
-The Thing Specifically Refuted
-Certainty By Closeness
-God Could Still Have Parts
>It's a constant feeling because you can't hold all of God in your mind, but you can hold the concept of Creator.
>Creator Concept is God in His conceptual form.
-Can't Hold All of God In Your Head
-God's Conceptual Form
-Real Certainty Is To hold It In Your Mind
-Creators Supremacy = Can just create something better than anything else!
-Closet to Farthest = Certainty starts within you and then you work outward from there. Creator, than Ind., than everything else. To do otherwise is to put the greatest emphasis on what you can know the least about, because that which is farthest is the least visible and may have parts.
-First Knowing It Exists = Questions of Supremacy and Ind. come later. First, you must know that the TTB/Concept in question actually exists and than you can hold all of it in your mind.
 >The first question to ask is whether the thing in question exists and can you know all of it?!
-Full Sightedness = You can only have certainty in that which you can see and which can have no parts (ie, that which you hold in your head).
-Certainty Equals Closeness
-You cannot Know All Of God
-
-Anything other than Ind. may not last forever, so only Ind. gives Certainty! Adding something to it only makes parts!
 >You can't start with Creator and than move to Ind. because that adds parts. And only Ind. can last forever, so only It gives True Certainty.
>Certainty of Infinity (ie, it will last forever) is the real test of whether a TTB has the hold on Certainty.
>The finite exists only thanks to the infinite, so in the quest to uncover True Certainty, the greater takes precedence over the smaller. Thus, Theist and Ind. comes before Creator and knwoing it completely in your mind.
-Practically speaking, Certainty is having no limitations (lasting, universal, eternal, infinite, etc.).
>You could shorten that to just saying that real and practical Certainty is simply having lasting ability.
-The opposite of all Certainty is the Darkness (obvious to the mind). Therefore, whatever beats the Darkness is 'Certainty' and that thing's TTB is the TTB you need!
-Trick of Creator = The trick of Creator is making itself look like certainty when really its just finiteness.
-
-Certainty & Supremacy
-Pangs of Doubt Will Always Attack
-Never Knowing All Of It = You will never know anything about any TTB. But the important thing is knowing what It is about and what Its nature/objective is?
-Everything Has Parts Unseen = After all, anything is possible, including the concept of Creator in your head having parts unseen!
-What Gives Certainty of Supremacy?
>Indivisability! Theist is immediate to that, but Creator is at least two parts away (adds parts because it needs Ind. to be Creator TTB).
-
-Parts can be deceptive = Creator TTB can't know for sure that what we see going on inside the A-Ideal is all that really is. Doubtless what we glimpse is only enough that our minds can handle.
-Unknowability still stands!
-Multiple Origins Potential = Just because you can demonstrate in the realm of potential how the A-Ideal operates or came about doesn't actually prove that's how it is. The A-Ideal could have an infinite number of ways It exists, began existing, Self-Created, etc. These include an infinite number of ways It can be all other ways combined as well!
-Actualization may be only one segment of the entire Substance of Divinity. How can you prove otherwise?
-We don't know what other rules are out there! And your argument for exclusive nature will always be founded on only a few rules!
-Even with logic, unless you know all the content of A-Infinity, there will still be room for emotional Doubt!
-Anything that can be defined must have infinite variance, this will always fuck up your argument. Even trying to include them all will not save you.
-Founding Principles = Your 'founding principles' can always turn out to be finite than you think. The idea of God being primarily Creator rests on the dichotomy of beginning and end, but whose to say there aren't an infinite number of variations to this? Maybe there is an infinite amount of other ways to exist or to 'begin to exist' that *somehow* have nothing to do with Creator? What then?
>Founding Principles can easily be mistaken for universal truth until you really question yourself about what you can know of them.
>For instance, take the idea that A-Ideal must be primarily Self-Creation because once the A-Ideal is and does everything that creates Itself. How do you know there isn't something(s) that steers it away to another concept? Maybe the A-Ideal does somethng primarily which is completely different from any notion of creating and yet our mortal minds can't grasp that, they can only grasp creation which is the closest approximate thing to that!?
>Maybe the idea of segments or all actions leading up to one conclusion are themselves mere parts of a greater whole?
>The problem with Founding Principles to any argument for what the substance of the A-ideal is is that they are always only the ones known to mortals. In truth, there must be an infinity of them within the A-Ideal!
>How do you know the idea of the A-ideal being and doing an infinite number of things adding up to Its Self-Creation is only true within our own section of Existence?! How can you prove that it is or isn't!?
>
-Why not just God in general?
-Potential to be about something else
   >Does this mean God doesn't contain the concept of non-actualized?
   >The problem of describing God, you automatically leave something out!
   >You can be Creator and believe there are multiple supremes or that Existence is fragmented.  Being Creator is not always tied to a unified Existence!
  >
-If Creator loses stuff of Creator, that is still a loss, because than there is not the fullness of the stuff of Creator. The concepts of those things still exist but they are lost. Creator is lesser for it.
-Not so with Theist.Theist is only ever about the Object of the A-Ideal. The loss of other objects never adds or diminishes it.
-Creator is about existence, or all things that exist, not just the A-Ideal. While the A-Ideal is the Canvass of Existence, Creator is about both the paint and the canvass, for the loss of either diminishes it.
-To be Creator is to be about the act of creating which multiple objects do! Therefore, Creator is principally is about all of them. Existence happens to be the product of the Great Creator Himself, although strictly speaking it is not intrinsic to the definition of Creator TTB.
-The chick from Zero Dawn dislikes God and yet she is Creator!
-To be Creator is to be principally about all creatings, for to be anything less is different definition.
-To be Creator is to be about creating. All creating. Intrinsically. Not just the Self-Creation.
-While Creator is about existence in our current setup, there are an infinite number of variations where Creator isn't about existence, because in those the sum of all things is not creatings.
-Whatever the meta-purpose of Creator, it is by definition about all creatings, not just Self-Creation. This feature is intrinsic to it and is foreign to the nature of the A-Ideal.
☀
-Only Theist keeps you close to God.
>Being Creator TTB is, in practice, all about you. God fades to the background and stays there.
>Ind. is of little use against the other pitfalls of life that require God, but which you forget to think of Him because Creator has you oriented around yourself.
>IN practice, Creator TTB is priarily about you and what your doing.
>By wont of being Almighty, the Supreme is thus the one thing before any other in Existence that you always want to stay close too. This is real wisdom.
>Ind. can't keep you always close to God if you are more oriented towards yourself via Creator TTB.
-The Darkness alone requires you to be close to God forever. Isn't that Natural Theology?
>
Subject Of Creator Is Not God
-The subject of creator or creating is not wholly the same as God.
-
-Founding-Truths!
-Etymology = The etymological definition of Creator is to be about all creatings. This is not the Aim of the A-Ideal!
-Creator is about both The Creator and Creations, but the A-Ideal is simply about The Creator! So be Theist! 
-
☀
-Culmination Of All Systems:
>The Actualized A-Ideal is the end-game of any and all systems possible for determing what the TTB is. It matters not what we mortals can know, only that the Supreme is the A-Ideal.
>The A-Ideal is one thing which has all the Reasons (for it to be TTB) within itself, which It alone has among all A-Infinity.
>The A-Ideal is one thing which is all things combined, which means it is all systems for determing a TTB combined together as well!
>To put it another way, the A-Ideal Actualized is the Culmination of Culminations.
>
Problems with Widest-Net:
>Creator is about all existence, only half of it.
>You are essentially dedicating yoursef to ignorance.
>While meant to eschew doubt, in reality you always owrry that you are missing out on the true TTB!
>Leads to The Darkness inevitably!
>And the Grey as well!
>Unless you cling to God, eventually He fades to the background.
>>Ind. is not enough to cling to God, Ind. is but one answer to several Foundational-Truths.
>
-Isnt human logic too limited to truly know what the TTB is?
>Human logic may be finite, but all we need is an actualized Supreme and for the A-Ideal to have All-Reasons.  It is obvious to the mind that as long as these are true, the Supreme is the Actualized A-Ideal and whatever else is out there finds its culmination in the Supreme alone!
>we don't need to know everything, we just need to know that the above is true.  The rest can be assumed to conform to this as well.
>All-Sufficiency covers unknown logic or Further-Truths. 
>Remember Creator/Widest-Net only leads to The Grey and Only-Half.
>The Logic we have right now does work.  Whatever the 'fullness' of logic might be, it must conform to the A-Ideal and All-Sufficiency.  Otherwise, logic contradicts itself!
>To put it another way, if the 'fullness of logic' points to something else, than it contradicts All-Sufficiency.  
>It really comes down to All-Sufficiency.  If AS is true, than worrying about the fullness of logic is pointless.  If AS isn't true, than there is something that doesn't exist!
>Something in the Realm of Potential must have All-Sufficiency or else something doesn't exist!  Whatever Fullness of Logic is, it must also conform to All-Sufficiency. 
>For all intents and purposes, All-Sufficiency equals All-Reasons. 
>It's really quite simple, either A-Ideal/All-Sufficiency isn't true, in which case something doesn't exist, or else it is true and Further-Truths must conform to it. 
>Culmination of All Systems - Whatever other truths, logic or systems are out there, the A-Ideal must be the pinnacle of them all, as per All-Sufficiency.  
>We don't have know al logic or truth, we just have to know that what we do have works and leads us to truth.  All-Sufficiency picks up from there.
>As long as human-logic can show what God wants to be (Actualized A-Ideal) we are good.  All-Reasons does that for us. 
>What we understand as logic is not the only thing backing up the A-Ideal, all other systems are as well.  
-Is Only-Half Better Than Theist?:
>The argument being that we can never know God fully, or trust Him fully.
>We must be able to trust God, as per the teachings of Protected-Knowledge and Cosmic-Trickster.
>While we can never know everything about God, we can know some things. Thanks to Ind., we know God is Almighty. We also know He is reasonably 'Good.' Those two attributes might be enough, and should offer more to hold onto than Creator with its Only-Half ever could!
>Knowing that God is Good and Almighty is sufficient for knowing Him, for purposes of Theist/Adept, because it means any idea of Him is at least God in potential, even if not Actualized. We can dedicate ourselves to the idea of God as much as God as He really is.
>We don't have to know everything about God, just some essentials we can always hold on to. This is obvious to the mind!
-Ergo, Theist can be known, and so Creator still falls to Only-Half!
>Technically, any object can always be revealed to be something different, any of the; but thanks to INd. we know God is Almighty. So we can know more about God than anything else, because that's one thing we know for certain!
-
-The Problem With Untrust:
-It is far too likely that other beings besides God would have an interest in fucking with us. Other humans do already, why not other 'things' as well?
>If we cannot trust that God protects us to a certain degree, than these beings have free reign.
>Also, anything, any object or concept, can alway s later be shown to be something you didn't realize it was. God, Creator, etc.
>Also, any concept can have a personification who proves to be an asshole. Trying to get away from Theist because of that won't solve anything.
*Without trust in God, as per Untrust, than the Darkness reigns!
-
-Untrust has 2 parts: can't know God as He is and can't know that He is moral.
>If God can't be known to be moral, the Darkness wins.
>If God can't be known, than Ind. is powerfuless and the Darkness wins!
>Ind. and Protected-Knowledge together destroy Untrust!
>
-If Untrust is true, the Darkness wins!
-
Does God Have To Be For Us?:
-No, as long as He is not against us.
-If God is against us, just give up...
-God may be aloof and uncaring, but there's still reason to study Him, ala Sum Of All Knowledge, etc.!
-At the ver last, He keeps the Darkness at bay!
-
Is Theist A Poor Specialization?:
-If being Theist allows me to be fully Adept as well, that's a trade I'm willing to make. With Creator, you hamper yourself with Only-Half!
>We know that God exists, and if He is against us, we are fucked, so we must assumed He's not. That's enough to be Theist/Adept for no other reason that being fully Adept without Only-Half!
-
Indeterminate Argument Refuted:
-The only true knowledge is Hope. We must trust that the Supreme intervenes.
-If Indeterminate is true, that works against Creator as well. You can never be totally sure that Creator is really the TTB of A-Infinity or even that A-Infinity can be whole!
-Indeterminate doesn't count towards Potential, which can be known concretely and is not subject to change or variation.
-The Indeterminate Argument leads to nihilism and the Grey.
-Somethings can be known to be true and can be followed without fear of future truths being revealed, such as needing God to combat the Darkness. Only the Supreme can beat the Darkness.
-The Indetermiante Argument ignores the entire concept of Obvious To The Mind.
-For instance, anything about God is true at least in Potential, etc.
Pick-And-Choose Argument:
-To be about infinity you need an OOR, which means you must have at least one object you are always tied to.
-Further more, pick and choose is reallly just trying to be about all objects at once which is imediately contradictory.
-The P&C Argument fails because you cannot trade between objects to be about permanently. You can be about other objects temporarily, which Theist can do because all things correspond to some portion of God's potential.
-Being about one object or class of objects permanently closes off the rest of infinity. Unless your Object(s) allows you to be connect with other objects.
-
Common-Denominator:
-To have a TTB/OOR is, by definition, to be about an object you will always need. As in, it will always have to be involved with what you do in a central and important way.
-But remember, there is a trick to existence: an object that also an OOR allows you to have an identity without losing access to all other objects in A-Infinity.
*Contrary to what Creator TTB has argued in the past, Creator TTB has only one principle object - the concept of creating. Because that is the only object that 'generates' Creator TTB. All TTBs/OORs really only have one object(s) they are founded upon as their principal object.
-Just because your TTB connects with all other objects doesn't mean they 'generate' it.
-Common-Denominator is kind of like a 'patch' for Widest-Net.
-Widest-Net is a good thing, but
Definitive:
-To make an argument for a TTB/OOR that sticks, you need something which is both definitive and is above and beyond any other definitive truths as well.
-This will be your primary object and cannot be replaced by other objects except temporarily.
-Only God specifically can combat The Darkness and ensure Protected-Knowledge. Without Him, no other knowledge could be trusted, and thus no other problem out there could be combated.
-Ergo, The Darkness is the true Anchor and always has been.
God Or Everything:
-We must be about God speciically because if we lose sight of Him, we lose access to that which defeats The Darkness and ensure knowledge. Without that, there is no hope or knowledge for anything else.
-Only the Supreme can beat The Darkness. Without the Supreme, the rest of the 'Great Hope' is utterly useless. Obvious to the Mind.
-The problem with being about Everything like Creator TTB is that it eventually leads to the Grey and the Darkness.
-
Being About Everything As What?:
-You can be about everything as Theist or be about everything as Creator? Why not choose the TTB based on that which defeats The Darkness.
-Creator is its own object, and being Creator TTB means it feels stupid to make things closer to Destroyer a central part of yourself.
-
Why Not Just Be About Everything?:
-Lack of focus and tendency towards the Grey/Darkness.
-Also, constant doubt that you are missing out by no specifically being about God who gaurantees protection from The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster.
-
God Specifically:
-If you don't keep your eyes on God, you begin to wander into infinity and lose sight of Him. I've experienced this first hand.
-WE must assume the worst, people must be taught to keep their eyes on God or they will wander from Him.
-
Threat of Forgetfulness:
-Without God, nothing else matters because nothing be known for sure or trusted.
-There is no problem, in actuality or potential, that God or some portion of God does not pertain to its solution.
-Cosmic-Trickster alone proves why it should be God specifically and not Everything as our title of choice. By having everything, all objects, as our mindset, we may wander from God, forget the argments for God, and thus lose to the Darkness.
-The threat of forgetfulness is the reason for God specificaly as our TTB and not Everything.
-Knowledge can degrade over time, having God specifically as our TTB ensures we return and remember the arguments for Him.
-Without God specifically, nothing else can be had.
-Since any TTB will always have a Common-Denominator, why not make that CD the one things forever needed to gaurantee truth and metaphysical security?
-
Future-Dependencies:
-You don' tknow the Mind of God or what He has already actualized. In the future, we may discover something else apart from God that we need metaphysically, for whatever reson, and having a Theist mindset might make it hard to be about that thing too.
-Better to be Creator, Everything,which is also uniquey about God.
-
Questions of the Shifting Are Endless:
-Straight up, should we be about God or Everything? The plainface truth is that we should be about Everything, which includes God as well!
-
-Any truth used to justify being about one things instead of Everything is not gauranteed to forever remain true and unchanged, a later truth discovered could totally change it. Yes, even something like Ind. or any other truth known about God!
-
You Can't Know What Else Might Pop UP:
-Actually, we can. Only the Supreme specifically can defeat the Darkness or Cosmic-Trickster. We can already know that nothing else in existence can do this. Or at lest, we can know that nothing else in existence can be known to do this except the Supreme.
First-Knowledge:
-Knowledge is not static but can degrade over time. Keep Solus Deus as mindset in order to keep refreshing our knowledge of God.
-Knowledge of God is the First-Knowledge without which all other information is suspect.
-
God Is Already A Common-Denoinator:
-If God alone can defeat The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster, than you already need Him all the time anyway.
-And if you need an identity, a TTB, which is automatically a common-denominator itself, why not put the two together and make things simpler for yourself? ???
-Let's be honest, Creator has etymological baggage you will already have to be about all the time anyway. So why not just switch to God/Theist and have just that one CD instead of two together?
-
Being About God Is The Same As Being About Everything:
-All things correspond to some portion of God's potential!
-
It's Impossible To Be About All Things:
-Even the idea of Everything as TTB is itself an object and will close off some options forever.
-For instane, if you are about everything, you cannot forever be about being only one thing or set of things. It's a technical example but it proves that idea presented here.
-There is no such thing as being about all things because existence is infinitely complex and contradictory.
-Of course, there's a trick here, namely the trick of rerouting. But it is true that any TTB will forever lock you out of some other options. Even if those options are purely technical.
-
Assume The Worst:
-Creator is too optimistic. We must assume that ppl will wander from God and become suceptible to The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster. We already see that today with the rise of relativism and nihilism!
-People must be taught to be about God specifically or they wander from Him. This is objective fact.
-
The Problem With Everything:
-You can't have everything, or even anything, with the likes of Cosmic-Trickster and The Darkness.
-God alone can defeat them but knowledge degrades over time.
-Ergo, to have everything, we must first have God.
-
Creator Isn't All Objects:
-Theist keeps having to reiterate this but Creator is just one object which is the idea of being about all things, but is still itself a single object. Same as God.
-
Being About Everything Has No Identity:
-Nothing to value, nothing to do...
-This is why the search for a TTB/OOR got started in the first place!
-This is why the OOR was such a revelation.
-It's not a question of God vs Everything because there is no such thing as Everything. Every TTB/OOR is really a Common-Denominator that you must always have and return to.
-So why choose a random OOR like Creator that claims to create a mindset of all things (when Theist does the same, ala God and God's Stuff) and just be about that which is alreayd necessary anyway!
-
God-Specifically:
-If you want everything, you first need God, else The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster will take it from you.
-Ergo, we must be about God specifically to ensre we never lose sight of Him.
-Anything is possible, including wandering away from God.
-Creator does honor God uniquely but that's less of a certainty that you'll stock to Him than if you are Theist. So its a matter of keeping the risk of losing God to a minumum.
-
Remember The Days Of Darkness; -Absolute fear makes all of existence useless, this alone is reason enough to be about God specifically, who is the only defense against it.
-Having everything means nothing if you lose the only thing that matters at all.
-The chance of losing God must be kept to a minumum. Why? Because of The Darkness. If you've forgotten that, just remember the Days of Darkness.
-
Minimizing The Darkness:
-The Darkness is all evil possible, and only the Supreme specifically can combat it all.
-As such, it is obvious to the mind that we must have the TTB that minimizes the risk of losing God.
-Creator Creator (the 'everything' TTB) holds God to be The Creator and unique to it, that is clearly not as strong a connection as what Theist has with God.
-Ergo, despite being defined as about all objects, it is Theist that we should be, because God alone holds down The Darkness.
-With Creator, there is the possibility of wandering from God, but not with Theist. It's basic math.
-
The Risk Of Losing Everything:
-Why should we be about God and not everything? Because of the percentage chance of losing Everything.
The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster can take all from us. We must cling to the Supreme to drive them off.
-As Creator, since anything is possible, you might walk away from the Supreme. Anyone could.
-This won't happen as Theist because the mindset of this TTB is only about God.
-With Creator, there is some unknown percentage of a risk of losing Everything. But not as Theist.
-
-Wanting access to everything and being about everything are not the same thing.
-
Category:Infinity Theology