User blog comment:Snowstripe the Fierce/Irrelevancy/@comment-1777104-20161020033849

We can assume that Jesus was not married, but we cannot prove it.  An argument from silence proves nothing.  Inferences made from general statements cannot prove anything.
There would be "problems" if Jesus had taken a wife, but God has always been a "problem solver."   The fact that Jesus was the Last Adam points to the image of God in the First Adam, who needed a wife to complete himself.  This role, according to Scripture, is fulfilled in the Church, the bride of Christ.  Because of this, one woman would not suffice.  
Furthermore, unlike the Kings and Priests before Him, he needed no successor.  Unlike Elijah, he didn't have a single disciple, but 12.  So it is fairly certain that he did not need a wife to carry on his work.  However, God adopted children, by definition "siblings" of Jesus.  
Even these facts don't "prove" Jesus wasn't married  However, it shows that he did not need to be, and that he probably was not.
Based on there not being any evidence in any credible sources, it can be safely assumed that Jesus was not married.  The Bible is silent, and so is history.