Fanon Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171121131329/@comment-29564364-20180119142058

@The Holder Of True Omnipotence
I never thought that you were implying such thing. I was pointing out that "Real World-type Author Authority" is an invalid proposition due to the contradictory natures of its parts.
On one hand we have "Real World," which implies taking place in reality, and on the other hand we have "Author Authority," which is a fictional concept and, by definition, is not real.
«THATS​ what I was trying to convey in the "second type", I don't know where you got the part about me saying they can control reality in the real world from...»
I got it from you saying that real people have Author Authority while Author Authority states in its capabilities that the user controls the reality they exist in, so a real user should control reality, which isn't the case for real people (author or otherwise).
Also, your first reply rises the question of what if Toby Fox himself decides that Author Authority's first, second, fifth, sixth and seventh limitations don't apply to the Annoying Dog. Would it not completely invalidate those limitations if applied to all other users and their transfictional authors?