Refutation by drinking game

Refutation by drinking game is the belief shared by many of the SJW inclined Gnu Atheists that an argument can be refuted by turning it into a drinking game. This is quite often seen on RationalWiki:
: This article is highly biased and unprofessional. It's more a rant then an objectieve observation with pros and cons. So it is far from "rational". My advise: start over again with a different writer. Guess the work RNS has to undo so many comments, I'm not the only one. Wishing you pleasure with this UNrational WIKI.
:::Hooray for ad hominem attacks! Drink! Conservative Punk (talk)
::::"But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! rpeh •T•C•E• 13:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
: - source
This form of "argument" can also be commonly seen as a refutation by anticipation, whereby anticipating an opponent's criticism is somehow supposed to constitute a refutation. Usually seen in the form of: "and, of course, my opponents will say x...", with no attempt at an actual refutation of x.