Report 1682

Report #1682
Skillset: Transmology Skill: Various
 Org: Minstrels Status: Completed Apr 2017
Furies' Decision:
Solutions 1 and 2, non-forcable.
Problem: Currently there is no way to just undo an illuminati morph. It has been
asked that there be a way to undo it, thus this report.
[A:12 R: 0] Solution #1: Allow each transmology skill that involves
 transformations to have a NATURAL option (FLESHCALL
<skin|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body>
<option|NATURAL>).
skin|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body>
<option|NATURAL>).
kin|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body> <option|NATURAL>).
in|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body> <option|NATURAL>).
n|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body> <option|NATURAL>).
|eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body> <option|NATURAL>).
eyes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body> <option|NATURAL>).
 yes|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body>
<option|NATURAL>).
 es|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body>
<option|NATURAL>).
 s|legs|ears|belly|nose|torso|hands|throat|mouth|body>
 <option|NATURAL>).
[A:11 R: 0] Solution #2: In addition to solution 1, allow FLESHCALL NATURAL to
 undo all transformations.
[A:11 R: 0] Solution #3: In addition to the above, remove the need to
 FLESHCALL FLESHWORK to start the process. This is
 just easing of life.
Player Comments:
---[Wobou on 4/15 @ 18:09 writes]:
Sol 1 and 2 both sound like RP abilities to me, I can't think of a mechanical
reason to go natural. I'm not necessarily opposed to it because it also has a
happy side effect of not impacting balance but I thought I should point that
out. I'm definitely for solution 3. I think it's rare in the game to have
"defences" (if we call transformations defences) to require other defences. It
makes it harder to code into systems.
---[Shuyin on 4/16 @ 00:58 writes]:
I don't really see the use of this but I also don't object to it. Don't make it
forceable please.
---[Demartel on 4/16 @ 16:24 writes]:
I can only see one use for this, but it couldn't be that, so I must be missing
something. Either way, it doesn't affect balance in any way so sure why not.
---[Shuyin on 4/16 @ 19:34 writes]:
These are fine. I was told by more knowledgeable parties what this is for. Oh
man. Just don't make it forceable, then it will have balance concerns
---[Eicia on 4/17 @ 04:38 writes]:
I don't quite understand this, sadly, but I can't see any harm in it for the
moment that's incredibly obvious.