Computational English Argument

1.   
I
prepared to program the robot to deliver the speech.  I did this by
writing the text-to-speech algorithm.  First, I wrote down the text. 
Second, I recorded the speech for this text.  Third, I converted the text
into the speech using a grammar.  In this way, I prepared to program the
robot to deliver the speech by writing the text-to-speech algorithm.
2.   
I
prepared to write how the robot would discover science.  I did this by
writing the question-answering algorithm.  First, I wrote down the
question word.  Second, I wrote down the key term in the question. 
Third, I wrote down the answer to the question, given the question word and key
term.  In this way, I prepared to write how the robot would discover
science by writing the question-answering algorithm.
3.   
I
prepared to disambiguate the text containing an anaphor.  I did this by
writing the anaphor resolution algorithm, where an anaphor is a word such as
“him” or “it,” which refer to other words.  First, I wrote
down “John ate the apple”.  Second, I wrote down “It was delicious”.  Third, I resolved the anaphor by writing
that the anaphor “It”
in the second sentence referred to the word “apple” in the first sentence where “apple” is the most recent object that “It” could refer to.  In this way, I prepared to
disambiguate the text containing an anaphor by writing the anaphor resolution
algorithm, where an anaphor is a word such as “him” or “it,” which refer to other words.
4.   
I
prepared to program the robot reporter to write the hansard in
parliament.  I did this by converting speech into text.  First, I
listened to the speech.  Second, I converted the frequency spectrum into a
set of phonemes, where phonemes are distinct units of sound that distinguish
one word from another.  Third, I wrote down the text from the
phonemes.  In this way, I prepared to program the robot reporter to write
the hansard in parliament by converting speech into text.
5.   
I
prepared to write the novel’s form in letters, for example “ABCDA”.  I did this by writing down the novel’s form through space.  First, I wrote down the
location in space of the first scene in the novel.  Second, I prepared to
write down the location in space of the next scene in the novel.  Third, I
repeated this until I had written down the location in space of each scene in
the novel.  In this way, I prepared to write the novel’s form in letters, for example “ABCDA,” by writing down the novel’s form through space.
6.   
I
prepared to give the novel a “positive” classification.  I did this by determining that the genre
of a novel was comedy.  First, I wrote down that the first sentence in the
novel was positive, therefore comical.  Second, I prepared to write down
that the next sentence in the novel was positive, therefore comical. 
Third, I repeated this until I had written down that all the sentences in the
novel were positive, therefore comical.  In this way, I prepared to give
the novel a “positive” classification by determining that the genre of a novel was
comedy.
7.   
I
prepared to give the novel a “positive dialogue” classification.I did this by determining that the
genre of a novel was drama.  First, I wrote down that the first sentence
in the novel was positive, therefore important.  Second, I prepared to
write down that the next sentence in the novel was positive, therefore
important. Third, I repeated this until I had written down that all the
sentences in the novel were positive, therefore important.  In this way, I
prepared to give the novel a “positive” classification by determining that the genre of a novel was
drama.
8.   
I
prepared to calculate the used space in the house in the short story.  I
did this by calculating the space complexity in Computational English.  First,
I counted the number of characters of space that the short story’s world was in length.  Second, I skipped
counting the number of characters of space that the short story’s world, where this space was revisited, in
length.  Third, I summed only the cumulative number of characters of space
that the short story’s
world was in length.  In this way, I prepared to calculate the used space
in the house in the short story by calculating the space complexity in
Computational English.
9.   
I
prepared to calculate how long the character walked around for.  I did
this by calculating the time complexity in Computational English.  First,
I counted the number of steps were used to traverse the short film’s world.  Second, I counted the number of steps
were used to traverse the short film’s world, where this space was revisited.  Third, I summed
the cumulative number of steps that were used to traverse the short film’s world.  In this way, I prepared to calculate
how long the character walked around for by calculating the time complexity in
Computational English.
10.I prepared to write how the text made sense.  I
did this by writing the summarisation algorithm.  First, I summarised each
object in the text into a hierarchy of types of nouns and verbs.  Second,
I read the number of the level of resolution of summary that was
required.  Third, I printed the summary types at this level, where 1 =
most summarised, n = least summarised and n = depth of detail in text.  In
this way, I prepared to write how the text made sense by writing the
summarisation algorithm.
11.I prepared to store the positive Computational
English phenomena in a box.  I did this by finding the positive results in
Computational English.  First, I wrote down the first leg of the
path.  Second, I prepared to write down the next leg of the path. 
Third, I repeated this until the correct result had been positively
found.  In this way, I prepared to store the positive Computational
English phenomena in a box by finding the positive results in Computational English.
12.I prepared to write what the Computational English
algorithm couldn’t
do outside a circle.  I did this by finding the negative results in
Computational English (actions that only other algorithms could do). 
First, I wrote down the first leg of the path.  Second, I prepared to
write down the next leg of the path.  Third, I repeated this until a block
was reached before correct result had been positively found, indicating a
negative result, i.e. the desired result may only be found by another
algorithm.  In this way, I prepared to write what the Computational
English algorithm couldn’t do outside a circle by finding the negative results in
Computational English (actions that only other algorithms could do).
13.I prepared to count the number of character
interrelationships in the narrative.  I did this by writing the character
ontologies in Computational English.  First, I wrote the names of the
characters on the sheet of paper.  Second, I drew circles around each
group of characters.  Third, I drew directional lines on sheets of paper
representing different stages of the narrative between each pair of characters
in a group and each pair of groups, etc.  In this way, I prepared to count
the number of character interrelationships in the narrative by writing the character
ontologies in Computational English.
14.I prepared to say that what happened is what was
supposed to have happened.  I did this by writing the plot ontologies in
Computational English.  First, I wrote down the first theme mentioned in
the plot.  Second, I prepared to write down the next theme mentioned in
the plot.  Third, I repeated this until I had written down all the themes
mentioned in the plot.  In this way, I prepared to say that what happened
is what was supposed to have happened by writing the plot ontologies in
Computational English.
15.I prepared to write how wanting to play caused a
chain reaction through the settings.  I did this by writing the setting
ontologies in Computational English.  First, I wrote down the first
setting mentioned in the story, the garden.  Second, I prepared to write
down the next setting mentioned in the story, the children’s cutting room.  Third, I repeated this until I
had written down all the settings mentioned in the story, including the
refrigerator.  In this way, I prepared to write how wanting to play caused
a chain reaction through the settings by writing the setting ontologies in
Computational English.
16.I prepared to write that the author achieved all her
aims.  I did this by writing the aim of the author in Computational
English.  First, I wrote the author chose the bull’s-eye to aim for.  Second, I wrote the author
selected possible text to use to be represented by the bull’s-eye.  Third, I wrote the author pointed with
an arrow at words that were best at achieving her aim.  I prepared to
write that the author achieved all her aims by writing the aim of the author in
Computational English.
17.I prepared to write influence was an experiential
midpoint between argument and interpretation.  I did this by writing the
author’s influence in
Computational English.  First, I wrote the person who was part of an
influx through the author’s life.  Second, I wrote what the person said.  Third,
I wrote the author’s
reply to what the person said.  In this way, I prepared to write influence
was an experiential midpoint between argument and interpretation by writing the
author’s influence in
Computational English.
18.I prepared to evince logical correctness.  I
did this by writing a statement “the man made it” was correct in Computational English.  First,
I wrote that the man walked along the track.  Second, I wrote that the man
reached the line.  Third, I wrote it was correct that the man made
it.  In this way, I prepared to evince logical correctness by writing a
statement “the man made it” was correct in Computational English.
19.I prepared to verify the title of the book was
good.  I did this by writing that the statement “I wrote the book” was good in Computational English.  First, I
verified that the people involved in writing the book were good.  Second,
I wrote I verified that he language in the book was good.  Third, I
verified that a model stage production of the book was good.  In this way,
I prepared to verify the title of the book was good by writing that the
statement “I wrote the book” was good in Computational English.
20.I prepared to publish the book.  I did this by
verifying that the text was well written.  First, I verified that the text
was factual.  Second, I verified that the text contained good ideas.
 Third, I verified that the text was grammatical.  In this way, I
prepared to publish the book by verifying that the text was well written.
21.I prepared to write the book.  I did this by
writing the text.  First, I thought of a topic.  Second, I wrote the
reason.  Third, I wrote an inference between the reason and the
conclusion.  In this way, I prepared to write the book by writing the
text.
22.I prepared to collect evidence on a topic.  I
did this by recording an object’s registration number.  First, I looked at an object. 
Second, I thought of its registration number.  Third, I recorded it in the
computer program.  In this way, I prepared to collect evidence on a topic
by recording an object’s registration number.
23.I prepared to become immortal (e.g. remembered until
a point in time).  I did this by recording the knowledge in the form of
modus ponens.  First, I wrote “I am happy because of placing the pink
skittle on the ground”.  Second, I wrote, “I am happy because of placing the pink
skittle on the ground, therefore you are happy because of knocking the pink
skittle over with the green ball”.  Third, I wrote, “You are happy because of knocking the
pink skittle over with the green ball”.  In this way, I prepared to become immortal (e.g.
remembered until a point in time) by recording the knowledge in the form of
modus ponens.
24.I prepared to bring arguments to all areas of
study.  I did this by constructing an argument from experience. 
First, I wrote down the first experience.  Second, I wrote down the second
experience.  Third, I connected these experiences with an inference that I
had experienced.  In this way, I prepared to bring arguments to all areas
of study by constructing an argument from experience.
25.I prepared to make the most central discoveries on
Earth.  I did this by writing on the topic “Encuntglish,” about the most important noumenon being opened up
like a book.  First, I opened the book.  Second, I considered what to
write.  Third, I wrote down my discovery.  In this way, I prepared to
make the most central discoveries on Earth by writing on the topic
“Encuntglish,” about the most
important noumenon being opened up like a book.
26.I prepared to make money from positive
circles.  I did this by writing that Inclish referred to Positivity
Inc.  First, I verified that the first term was positive.  Second, I
verified that the next term was positive.  Third, I repeated this until I
had verified that all the terms were positive.  In this way, I prepared to
make money from positivity by writing that Inclish referred to Positivity Inc.
27.I prepared to verify that the soldier had packed
lunch.  I did this by writing that Inglish referred to “in” being unified with another instance of “in”.  First, I placed a chocolate in the child’s hand.  Second, I verified that the chocolate
was still in the child’s hand.  Third, I verified that the child had eaten the
chocolate.  In this way, I prepared to verify that the soldier had packed
lunch by writing that Inglish referred to “in” being unified with another instance of “in”.
28.I prepared to write a seen-as version for a student’s essay.  I did this by writing that Conglish
referred to Computational English, the detailed phenomenological investigation
into computational algorithms for English functions.  First, I wrote the
sense data that a person was interested in learning meditation (e.g. reading a
book).  Second, I connected this information with the knowledge to teach
meditation in my brain (e.g. looked up values in a table).  Third, I
taught the meditation student meditation by telling him to silently repeat God’s name the mantra “Lucian”, for twenty minutes each day, until the mantra
becomes more and more refined, transcending and clearing thoughts that are
thought of as byproducts of stress (e.g. explained the mathematical
equation).  In this way, I prepared to write a seen-as version for a
student’s essay by writing
that Conglish referred to Computational English, the detailed phenomenological
investigation into computational algorithms for English functions.
29.I prepared to tell the story of the loaf.  I
did this by writing that Kinglish referred to the King’s symbols.  First, I read the eight-pointed
star.  Second, I read the loaf-eater symbol.  Third, I read the orb
symbol.  In this way, I prepared to tell the story of the loaf by writing
that Kinglish referred to the King’s symbols.
30.I prepared to design icons for each essay
topic.  I did this by writing that Basic Ciccy referred to an icon being
designed for an essay topic.  First, I read the essay topic.  Second,
I designed an icon for it.  Third, I clicked on the icon.  In this
way, I prepared to design icons for each essay topic by writing that Basic
Ciccy referred to an icon being designed for an essay topic.
31.I prepared to discover the protein code.  I did
this by writing that Bioschemistry (sic) referred to computational
biochemistry, the study of the computational nature of proteins.  First, I
discovered the first biochemical reaction.  Second, I prepared to discover
the next biochemical reaction.  Third, I repeated this until I had
discover all the biochemical reactions and the desired result had been
achieved.  In this way, I prepared to discover the protein code by writing
that Bioschemistry (sic) referred to computational biochemistry, the study of
the computational nature of proteins.
32.I prepared to make a protein computer.  I did
this by writing that Bicochemistry (sic) referred to biochemical computation,
the study of the manipulation of the computational nature of proteins. 
First, I caused the first biochemical reaction.  Second, I prepared to
observe the next biochemical reaction.  Third, I repeated this until I had
observed all the biochemical reactions and the desired result had been
achieved.  In this way, I prepared to make a protein computer by writing
that Bicochemistry (sic) referred to biochemical computation, the study of the
manipulation of the computational nature of proteins.
33.I prepared to help with one threshold. I did this by
choosing one threshold. First, I interpreted it. Second, I chose God
(philosopher) lines. Third, I liked it. In this way, I prepared to help with
one threshold by choosing one threshold.
34.I prepared to write laws. I did this by writing laws
and guidelines for writing breasonings currency. First, I made compost. Second,
I found a mug. Third, I drank from it. In this way, I prepared to write laws by
writing laws and guidelines for writing breasonings currency.
35.I prepared to write on you too. I did this by
writing topics to write breasonings currency on. First, I wrote the artemis
ardamon. Second, I wrote you, As. Third, I like your rods. In this way, I
prepared to write on you too by writing topics to write breasonings currency
on.
36.I prepared to know Artemis. I did this by
researching the product of the breasoning currency. First, I wrote on the
breasoning currency. Second, I held aloft the Parises Whittaker. Third, I knew
about Dick Whittington. In this way, I prepared to know Artemis by researching
the product of the breasoning currency.
37.I prepared to write on breasonings currency. I did
this by instituting training in Pedagogy. First, I found the raptures. Second,
I held up too soon. Third, I had specialised breasonings currency writing
training. In this way, I prepared to write on breasonings currency by
instituting training in Pedagogy.
38.I prepared to join up doughnut religion
(philosophy). I did this by training in philosophy. First, I wrote philosophy.
Second, I wrote on tizziwinkle's flappings. Third, I designed you. In this way,
I prepared to join up doughnut religion (philosophy) by training in philosophy.
39.I prepared to unend things. I did this by training
in creative writing. First, I gained the confidence to pick up the pen. Second,
I gained the confidence to write. Third, I breasoned out the breasonings. In
this way, I prepared to unend things by training in creative writing.
40.I prepared to . I did this by training in business.
First, I stated, “That's what the word currency is about”. Second, I identified the receipt. Third, I
designed you too. In this way, .
41.I prepared to dine on the quince. I did this by
researching breasonings currency with ethics approval. First, I designed ethics
approval. Second, I designed the man's manuscripts. Third, I held the effigies.
In this way, I prepared to dine on the quince by researching breasonings
currency with ethics approval.
42. I prepared to connect 50 As to each sentence. I did
this by setting breasonings currency medicine as the domain of my PhD. First, I
resaeched the medicinal requirements of the product. Second, I wrote the
epistemological details about it. Third, I held the nanotode (sic). In this
way, I prepared to connect 50 As to each sentence by setting breasonings
currency medicine as the domain of my PhD.