Charles Kingsley

JohnBurroughs
=== archive.org ===
Frederick Maurice
download and type page 609 for the letter unscanned 
http://ia600406.us.archive.org/17/items/worksofcharleski07king/worksofcharleski07king.pdf
f. maurice 
TO REV. F. D. MAURICE p.176
convert to darwin's views
http://archive.org/stream/worksofcharleski07king/worksofcharleski07king_djvu.txt
TO REV. F. D. MAURICE letter 1863, as quoted by Osborn Nytimes 1915 around:
" I am very busy working out points of Natural The- 
ology, by the strange light of Huxley, Darwin, and Lyell. 
I think I shall come to something worth having before I 
have done. But I am not going to rush into print this 
seven years, for this reason : The state of the scientific 
mind is most curious ; Darwin is conquering everywhere, 
and rushing in like a flood, by the mere force of truth 
and fact. The one or two who hold out are forced to 
try all sorts of subterfuges as to fact, or else by evoking 
the odium theologicum. . . . But they find that now 
they have got rid of an interfering God — a master- 
magician, as I call it — they have to choose between 
the absolute empire of accident, and a living, immanent, 
ever-working God. Grove's truly great mind has seized 
the latter alternative already, on the side of chemistry. 
Ansted is "eeling for it in geology ; and so is Lyell ; and 
I, in my small way of zoology, am urging it on Huxley, 
Rolleston, and Bates, who has just discovered facts 
about certain butterflies in the valley of the Amazon, 
which have filled me, and, I trust, others, with utter 
astonishment and awe. Verily, God is great, or else 
there is no God at all. 
=== Nytimes ===
Henry fairfield osborne - 98995000.pdf from the New York Times 1922, March 5
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9C05E7DA1F30EE3ABC4D53DFB5668389639EDE&scp=1&sq=henry+fairfield+osborn&st=p
In 1863 Charles Kingsley wrote to Frederick Maurice:
"....Now that they have got rid of an interfering God -- a master magician as I call it -- they have to choose between the absolute empire of accident and a living, immanent, ever-working God" (quoted in Raven, 177)..."
If Kingsley interpreted Darwin in the "accident" sense with the word evolution what sense do have with it? 
 they have to choose between the absolute empire or accident, and a living, immanent , everlasting working God 
And elsewhere Kingsley wrote about Darwin’s contribution thus: "Now that they have got rid of an interfering God -- a master magician as I call it -- they have to choose between the absolute empire of accident and a living, immanent, ever-working God" (quoted in Raven, 177)
=== Kingsley 1863 ===
sborne quoting Kingsley:
".. Darwin is conquering everywhere, and rushing in like a flood, by the mere force of truth and fact. The one or two who hold out against Darwin are forced to try all sorts of subterfuges as to fact or else by invoking the tedium theologium.... The state of the scientific mind; they find that now they have got rid 
of an interfering God - a master magician as I call it -- they have to choose between the absolute empire of accident and a living, immanent, ever-working God..."
=== Human nature author ===
http://human-nature.com/dm/chap4.html
p.106
Kingsley wrote to Darwin in 1859, this must have been 1861
:'....I have gradually learnt to see that it is just as noble a conception of Deity, to believe that he created primal forms capable of self-development into all forms needful pro tempore and pro loco, as to believe that he required a fresh act of intervention to supply the lacunas which He himself had made. I question whether the former be not the loftier thought....'
=== published ===
Henry Fairfield Osbourne wrote an article for the New York times 5 March 1922. 
..Thirteen years earlier in 1863, Charles Kingsley, who's religion no one has ever challenged struck the note of truth
=== rpely mikel ===
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/ac52c73b1fc53deb#
=== Waagen ===
Osborne:
"...The mode of origin of species was practically discovered by Waagen in 1869, but like the great discovery by Mendel of heredity, this truth has been long in making its way, even among biologists. Waagen's observation that species do not originate by chance or accident as Darwin had at one time supposed, 
but by a continues and well ordered process, has since been confirmed by an overwhelming body of testimony, so that we are now able to assemble and place in order animals in their true evolutionary succession , extending , in the case of what I have called the edition de luxe of the horses, over millions of years. Evolution has passed from the domain of theory into the domain of natural law. Evolution takes its place with the gravitation law of Newton..."
=== NS ===
"...Mr. Bryan is extremely confused - as in fact many evolutionists are - by the radical differences of opinion as to the power of natural selection itself, expressed by recent writers such as John Borroughs and Professor Bateson. If it is difficult for biologists to think straight about this very intricate subject of evolution, how much more difficult must it be for the layman ? ......"
".... I have not yet had time to answer John Burroughs whole misleading article on Natural Selection in the Atlantic Monthly .... but in my opinion natural selection is the only cause of evolution which has thus far been discovered and demonstrated. I believe there are many other causes which remain to be 
discovered and demonstrated. 
=== evolution post 489 ===
=== Kingsley letter to darwin ===
http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext00/2llcd10.txt
=== Kingsley's 'Life',' ii, page 171 ===
=== John Burroughs ===
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/john_burroughs
=== asd ===
Professor Bateson