Cinematic Excrement

Sean Moore (born: ), better known online as Cinematic Excrement (also known as Smeghead), is an American YouTube reviewer who reviews poorly-received films.
==Content==
As the name suggests, the channel is dedicated to reviewing terrible movies. Whether they're big budget, low budget, blockbusters, mockbusters, independent, studio made, animated, live-action, domestic, foreign, obscure, mainstream, he'll review it all. His favorite targets include , the trilogy, films, films, movies from , Christian propaganda, and all other sorts of films.
As of this writing 119 episodes (when counting the 2 parters of the , , and reviews as one episode each and not counting the review of "") have been made of the show and all are available on either his YouTube channel or Vimeo account.
===Lost Episode===
Following the death of Justin Carmical (JewWario), Moore decided to postpone his review of and do a review of as a tribute to him.
Four years later, Channel Awesome was engulfed in controversy where former contributors released a document that complained about mistreatment of employees, favoritism, and overall incompetence. One of the more talked about things in the document was about an incident involving one contributor. When CA released a rebuttal where at one point, they showed screenshots of a completely different incident involving the contributor with the person's name being badly whited out. The bits of letters sticking out of the whited-out areas and the date the second incident took place made everyone realize that JewWario was the contributor in question. Not only that, but it was also uncovered that JewWario had a history of being a serial rapist, pedophile, and groomer.
Like most people who paid tribute to JewWario, Moore had a response to the news. And that response was to delete the video from both his YouTube and Vimeo accounts. The only proof of the review's existence is it's page on CE's WordPress account, which housed both links.
==Razzie Marathon==
On August 4, 2018, after having reviewed and after having felt that they were snubbed at the 38th Golden Raspberry Awards, Smeghead decided to take it upon himself to review all the films that won the "Worst Picture" award and see whether he agreed with the choices or not. The marathon concluded on Christmas Day 2023, lasting five years and four months.
*"α" means he reviewed the film before the marathon.
*"ω" means not only did he review the film before the marathon, but also before it even won "Worst Picture".
*"β" means he hadn't reviewed it before the marathon, but already gave his opinion on it.
*"ψ" means he reviewed the film post-marathon.
* Review of Can't Stop the Music
** Status: Agreed
** Reason: Thought the movie was "pretty bad".
** Other Nominations: He agreed with "Worst Screenplay" but felt that the acting and "Worst Original Song" nominations weren't deserved.
* Review of Mommie Dearest
** Status: Agreed
** Reason: Felt it deserved to be nominated, but not for the reasons the Razzies nominated it (his reason was because it turned a story about child abuse into a farce, the Razzies' reason was because they saw it as an unintentional comedy).
** Other Nominations: He agreed with the "Worst Screenplay" and acting wins. He did however feel it didn't deserve to be named "Worst Picture of the Decade" over Inchon. How he feels about it losing to Battlefield Earth for "Worst 'Drama' of Our First 25 Years" remains to be seen.
* Review of Inchon
** Status: Agreed
** Reason: Thought the movie was "terrible" and that it did nothing well.
** Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Actor" (), and "Worst Director" (), and felt was snubbed for "Worst Supporting Actor". He also stated it deserved to be named "Worst Picture of the Decade" over Mommie Dearest.
* Review of The Lonely Lady
** Status: Disagreed
** Reason: Felt that it wasn't nearly as bad as the other four nominees and felt that should've been nominated in its place.
** Other Nominations: He stated he doesn't argue with most of them, though which ones he never specified.
* Review of Bolero
** Status: Agreed
** Reason: Thought the movie was "absolutely terrible" and admitted he couldn't argue with its win.
** Other Nominations: He agreed with the "Worst Director" (), "Worst Screenplay", and acting wins.
* Review of Rambo: First Blood Part II
** Status: Disagreed
** Reason: Felt that should've been nominated in its place.
** Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Original Song" and "Worst Screenplay". He disagreed with the win for "Worst Actor" ().
* Review of Howard the Duck and Review of Under the Cherry Moon
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that Under the Cherry Moon was the worst of the two and that the tie was unwarranted.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with Howard the Duck's win and Under the Cherry Moon nomination for "Worst Screenplay" and Howard the Duck's win for "Worst Visual Effects". He disagreed with Under the Cherry Moon's win for "Worst Supporting Actor" (), feeling it should have gone to for Howard the Duck. He also heavily disagreed with "The six guys and gals in the duck suit" from Howard the Duck's win and ' nomination for "Worst New Star" and Thomas' nomination for "Worst Supporting Actress" for Under the Cherry Moon as he felt that was unfair to all 7 of them. While he mentioned 's wins for "Worst Director", "Worst Actor", and "Worst Original Song" for Under the Cherry Moon in passing, he never stated if he deserved them. But given how he criticized to Prince's acting and directing throughout the review and the lack of songs in the movie, it might be fair to say he thought he deserved them.
* Review of Leonard Part 6
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Thought the movie was “painful to sit through” and admitted he couldn't argue with any of its wins. The only other nominee felt could've given Leonard Part 6 a run for its money was , but he still considered the former worse, which he claims was "no small feat".
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Screenplay" and "Worst Actor" ().
* Review of Cocktail
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Considered it too average of a bad movie to be awarded that title. Of the other four nominees, he felt that , , and probably even were more deserving, especially Hot to Trot.
**Other Nominations: Didn't comment on them.
* Review of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier
**Status: Neither
**Reason: Felt that this film and the other four nominees were equally terrible.
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with 's win for "Worst Director" and felt mixed about his win for "Worst Actor", the former because he thought Shatner's directing was fine & that the real problem was Shatner's vision getting in the way of the film's budget and the latter because while he admitted Shatner's never been a good actor, he felt that giving him that award was "taking the easy route".
* Review of Ghosts Can't Do It and Review of The Adventures of Ford Fairlane
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that Ghosts Can’t Do It was the worst of the two and that the tie was unwarranted.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with The Adventures of Ford Fairlane's win for "Worst Screenplay". He felt that should've been nominated over for "Worst Supporting Actor" for The Adventures of Ford Fairlane, but ultimately agreed with the eventual winner; for Ghosts Can’t Do It. While he mentioned Ghosts Can’t Do It's wins for "Worst Actress" () and "Worst Director" (John Derek), and 's win for "Worst Actor" for The Adventures of Ford Fairlane in passing, he never stated if they deserved them. But given how he criticized all three of them, it might be fair to say he thought they deserved them.
* Review of Hudson Hawk
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that was more deserving of the title.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Screenplay" and "Worst Director" (). He disagreed with the acting nominations.
* Review of Shining Through
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Thought it was the 2nd silliest movie about WWII he's seen (the silliest being , which was intentionally silly).
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Director" () and "Worst Actress" ().
* Review of Indecent Proposal
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Thought it was trash and that it was worse than the other nominees.
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with 's win for "Worst Supporting Actor", but only because he felt Harrelson was more deserving of a "Worst Actor" nomination over . While he mentioned the film's win for "Worst Screenplay", he never stated if it deserved it. But given how when criticized the writing of the film, it might be fair to say he thought it deserved it.
* Review of Color of Night
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that was more deserving of the title.
**Other Nominations: It didn't win any of its other nominations.
* Review of Showgirls
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: He considers it "one of the best bad movies of all time".
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Screenplay', and "Worst Director" ().
* Review of Striptease
**Status: Neither
**Reason: Felt that this film and the other four nominees were equally terrible.
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with the win for ​"Worst Original Song" (because the song wasn't original). While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Director" (), "Worst Actress" (), and "Worst Screen Couple" (Moore and ), he never stated if it deserved them. But given how he criticized the changes Bergman made to the book's story and Moore for acting as if she was in a serious drama despite the film being a comedy, it might be fair to say he thought it deserved the former three. The latter win he might disagree with given Reynolds' performance was one the few things he praised about the movie.
* Review of The Postman
**Status: Unknown
**Reason: Thought the film was bad (though still not as bad as ), no matter how resonant with 2020 ("right-wing fundamentalists led by an unlikable, unprepared jackass", the postal service having extra importance given the pandemic) it is. He however ended the video before he could find a verdict so it remains unknown whether he thought it deserved its win.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the win for "Worst Actor" (). He disagreed with the win for "Worst Original Song". While he mentioned the films win's for "Worst Director" (also Costner) and "Worst Screenplay", he never stated if it deserved them. but given how he criticized both aspects of the film, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
* Review of An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Considers it "worse than Showgirls" and that it was worse than the other nominees.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Supporting Actor" (), "Worst New Star" (also Eszterhas), and "Worst Original Song". He disagreed with 's nomination for "Worst Actor".
* Review of Wild Wild West
**Status: Both
**Reason: Considered it worse than the other nominees (agreed), but thought that 1999 had worse movies, such as , , , and his own pick, (disagreed).
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with the win for "Worst Original Song" (because there were no other nominees). While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Director" (), "Worst Screenplay", and "Worst Screen Couple" ( and ), he never stated if it deserved them. But given how he criticized all three of those aspects of the film, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
*α Review of Battlefield Earth and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: In his second look review, he acknowledged the film as easily worse than the other nominees (even if Smeghead didn't see ) because it had incompetent filmmaking of the worst regard, the kind that makes the movie unintentionally funny.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Director" (), "Worst Actor (), and "Worst Screen Combo" (Travolta and anyone sharing the screen with him), though he did feel that last one was pointless. He disagreed with 's win for "Worst Supporting Actress" (because it was for a one scene performance) and while acknowledging the win for "Worst Supporting Actor" (, with nominated), Smeghead admitted he was baffled that was ignored by the Razzies, particularly because that movie's acting is worse than the one in Battlefield Earth (singling out , , , and ).
* Review of Freddy Got Fingered
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Considered the film crass, unfunny and worst of all, frustrating given Sean found 's material on MTV actually entertaining.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with all of them.
* Review of Swept Away
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Found it bad but not boring, while the other Worst Picture were three bad but mostly forgettable flicks, plus , which wasn't unforgivable no matter if it contained some bad decisions. Sean eventually noted the Razzies somehow passed over some even worse movies which he had already reviewed, saying was the worst movie of 2002, with being a close second.
**Other Nominations: While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Director" (), "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Screen Couple" (Madonna and ) and "Worst Remake or Sequel", he never stated if it deserved them. But given how he criticized all four of those aspects of the film, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
* Review of Gigli
**Status: Both
**Reason: Considered it worse than the other nominees (agreed), but thought it was the second worst movie of 2003 behind the fairly obscure at the time (disagreed).
**Other Nominations: Agreed with the wins for "Worst Actor" (). "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Screen Couple" (Affleck and Lopez), "Worst Screenplay", and "Worst Director" (). He disagreed with and 's nominations for "Worst Supporting Actor", deeming them the only good parts of the movie.
*α Review of Catwoman and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Thought the film was "wretched from top to bottom". In his second look review, he stood by his previous sentiments, with him having also agreed that it was the worst of the nominees (though Sean hadn't seen ), for being overtly stupid and badly made.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with all of them, though he admitted in his second look that he was too harsh on .
* Review of Dirty Love
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: While acknowledging two movies of that year that were just as bad, (also a Worst Picture nominee) and (nominated for Worst Director, and also target of one of the show's episodes), he felt Dirty Love "actually hated me and wanted me to suffer".
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Screenplay", and "Worst Director" (), and felt was snubbed for "Worst Supporting Actress" and was more deserving than for .
* Review of Basic Instinct 2
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that fellow Worst Picture nominee (which he had previously reviewed) was worse.
**Other Nominations: While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Screenplay", and "Worst Prequel or Sequel", he never stated if it deserved them. But given how he criticized the stupid script and Stone giving a performance not as good as in the original, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
* Review of I Know Who Killed Me
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that was more deserving of the title.
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with the film's wins for "Worst Actress" ( tied with herself), especially the joke that they repeated verbatim on "Worst Screen Couple", as well as how lame it was giving it "Worst Sequel, Remake or Rip-Off" claiming it was a rip-off of .
* Review of The Love Guru
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Felt that (as well as joint Worst Picture nominee , the latter of which he previously reviewed) was more deserving of the title.
**Other Nominations: While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Actor" () and "Worst Screenplay" he never stated if it deserved them. But given that he criticized both aspects thoroughly, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
*α Review of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
**Status: Possible disagreement.
**Reason: In his retrospective of , Sean still deemed Revenge of the Fallen as bad (though more criticism was spent on the fifth movie, ), but never said that he agreed with the "Worst Picture" win or compared it to the other nominees of 2009. However, in his Twilight retrospective (see below), he said was the worst film of 2009, being shocked at its lack of nominations.
**Other Nominations: Didn't discuss them, while noting the ones for the other four movies (plus a "Razzie Redeemer" one for , which Sean praised for doing what he actually wanted from a Transformers movie).
*ω Review of The Last Airbender and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed.
** Reason: In his second look review, Sean agreed it was the worst movie of 2010 and that the other "Worst Picture" nominees were nowhere near as bad, lambasting the movie as only watchable with the treatment and an utter waste of a great material, with the only good thing the movie did was that to make his review, he watched to get background knowledge and became a huge fan.
**Other Nominations: While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Director" (), "Worst Supporting Actor" (, in conjunction with ), and "Worst Eye-Gouging Misuse of 3-D", he never stated if it deserved them. But given how he criticized all four of those aspects of the film, it might be fair to say he though it deserved them.
*α Review of Jack and Jill and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Thought the film was "fucking terrible" and would only watch it again if released a commentary track. The only other nominee he felt could give Jack and Jill a run for its money was , but he still found Jack and Jill to be worse due to its annoyance factor. In his second look, he didn't change his stance in the least bit and points out that the only true positive of the film is the "Dunkaccino" scene and the memes it originated thanks to Saltydkdan.
**Other Nominations: During his second look, Smeghead admits he disagreed with two of the ten awards (i.e. all the categories), Al Pacino as "Worst Supporting Actor" (while also pointing out he found none of the five nominees to deserve it), and "Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel" for being a remake/rip-off of , a joke he called "straight up bullshit" and that using any other movie involving crossdressing would've made as much sense.
*α Review of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason:: In his series retrospective, Sean says fellow "Worst Picture" nominee was worse with being a close second, and that while all Twilight movies were bad, Breaking Dawn - Part 2 was the closest they got to being good.
**Other Nominations: While he mentioned the film's wins for "Worst Actress" (), "Worst Supporting Actor" (), "Worst Director" (), "Worst Screen Couple" (Lautner and ), "Worst Screen Ensemble", and "Worst Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel" as well as Eclipse's aforementioned "Worst Supporting Actor" win for Jackson Rathbone (which was in conjunction with The Last Airbender) both times, he never stated if it deserved them. But given he finds this film to be the "best" of the saga, he might disagree with the majority of the wins with the possible exception of "Worst Screen Couple" given the implications surrounding it.
*Review of Movie 43
**Status: Disagreed
** Reason: Found (which only scored a "Worst Supporting Actress" nomination for Lindsay Lohan, and was noted by Sean as mostly recycling the material done 14 years prior in The Underground Comedy Movie) an even worse picture.
**Other Nominations: Didn't discuss them, but it's safe to say he agreed with the "Worst Screenplay" win saying the film's crass and unfunny script was what made Movie 43 not work at all in spite of the talent behind the camera (recognized by the "Worst Director" award).
*α Review of Saving Christmas and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed
** Reason: In his second look review, he acknowledged that while all of the other four "Worst Picture" nominees (all of whom he reviewed) were bad, Saving Christmas was the worst for having the least effort put into it.
**Other Nominations: While he acknowledged the wins for "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Actor" (), "Worst Screen Combo" (Cameron and his ego - the last one, helped by how Cameron claimed the negative reviews and low IMDb score were a campaign targeting his movie), he never commented on whether they were earned or not. But given the negative assessment to all aspects, it's fair to say he thought it deserved them.
*ω Review of Fifty Shades of Grey and α Review of Fant4stic
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: While he previously listed Fant4stic fourth among his worst of 2015, while segueing into the episode on Fifty Shades, which is acknowledged right in the intro as the worst movie of the year, once he arrived in 2015's winners, reviewing as he had not done an episode on that yet, he declared Fant4stic should've been the winner, as Fifty Shades at least delivered what the audience wanted out of it, while Fant4stic seems clueless about its purpose and the result disappointed everyone, making it the lesser of the two.
**Other Nominations: While he acknowledged Fant4stic's wins for "Worst Director" () and "Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel", he never stated if it deserved them. But given he criticized all of that film's creative decisions, and that in his Fifty Shades review he widely criticized all the aspects that won awards ("Worst Screenplay", "Worst Actor" (), "Worst Actress" (), and "Worst Screen Combo" (Dornan and Johnson)), so it's safe to say he agrees with all the picks.
*α Review of Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party and 2nd Look
**Status: Agreed
** Reason: He outright opens his second look by agreeing that it was the worst movie of the year and that as much as he hated it in 2017 the movie was even worse on a rewatch.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the win for "Worst Actress" (but only in the context of it having gone to rather than Rebekah Turner as the Razzies vaguely said the award went to "the actress who played Hillary Clinton" when they both did, though the former was actually on screen more than the latter). While he did mention the films wins for "Worst Actor" () and "Worst Director" (D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), he never stated it deserved them. But given he criticized a lot of the technical aspects of the films, it might be fair that he thought it deserved the latter but not the former as, despite disliking D'Souza, he has criticized the Razzies in the past for giving acting awards to documentaries when the subjects are just being themselves.
*β Review of The Emoji Movie
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: He stated in his The Book of Henry review that he felt that Transformers: The Last Knight and were more deserving of the title. In his proper review of The Emoji Movie (where Sean notes his initial assessment was 'Meh', but upon rewatches improved to '💩'), he instead says The Snowman is the worst movie of 2017, noting that as awful as Emoji was, it at least managed to deliver a complete movie in a really short development time, while Snowman was crippled once the shooting time was cut down and visibly has missing unfilmed parts that not even three editors could disguise.
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with the win for "Worst Screen Combo" ("Any two obnoxious emojis"), calling it as lazy as the film's own script. While he did mention the wins for "Worst Director" () and "Worst Screenplay", he never stated if he thought it deserved them.
*Review of Holmes & Watson
**Status: Both
**Reason: Found it the worst of the five Worst Picture nominees (agreed), but considered that the worst movie of 2018 was , which got nominations in other Razzie categories (disagreed).
**Other Nominations: He disagreed with the win for as "Worst Supporting Actor", saying his performance was not bad, he only was not funny, and for "Worst Remake, Rip-Off or Sequel", saying the movie was none of those things. Regarding Etan Cohen's win as "Worst Director", Sean's extensive criticism, including on how at times it seemed the director decided to ditch the script and just let the actors do whatever they wanted (he compared with the other Worst Picture nominee he truly hated, , which he considered to at least have a coherent story and stick to it), it's safe to say he agrees. 
*Review of Cats
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Found it the worst movie of 2019, standing out among a particularly rotten batch of Worst Picture nominees, with heavy criticism on the thin plotting and nightmarish imagery.
**Other Nominations: Didn't mention them, but it's safe to say he agreed with the wins for Worst Director (with Sean giving a specific lashing out on how mistreated the effects artists, leading to the results being both unsettling and unfinished) and Worst Screenplay.
*Review of Absolute Proof
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: Considered that as a bad as it was it hardly qualified as a movie (even if marketed as a documentary), and felt that fellow Worst Picture nominee was a more deserving winner.
**Other Nominations: Didn't mention Mike Lindell's win for Worst Actor, but Sean has previously expressed his disapproval for giving acting awards to non-fiction works.
*Review of Diana: The Musical
**Status: Disagreed
**Reason: For the same reasons as Absolute Proof, he felt it didn't qualify as a movie as it was merely a stage musical that was filmed, which he believed doesn't count, and believed either or (which was nominated the previous year for reasons he remains unsure ofDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Academy extended the yearly window for the up until February 28, 2021, and the Razzies did the same, opening the field for Music, that premiered in the US on February 12) were more deserving of Worst Picture.
**Other Nominations: He agreed with the wins for "Worst Director" () and "Worst Screenplay" ( & ), but disagreed with the wins for Jeanna de Waal as "Worst Actress" and as "Worst Supporting Actress" saying their performances weren't the problem and that they were likely nominated simply for being in a bad movie, something Sean has previously criticized the Razzies for doing over the years.
*Review of Blonde
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Found it the worst of the five nominees and the year overall, finding it long, slow, exploitative, aimless, and disrespectful of even if she was well-portrayed by .
**Other Nominations: Was confused at how won "Worst Screenplay" but not "Worst Director" (which went to for ).
*ψReview of WInnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey
**Status: Agreed
**Reason: Found it the worst of the five nominees, a cheap and incompetently made film that "will make you feel like you've wasted your life", and would've been a generic slasher if not for the lazy implementation of Winnie-the-Pooh elements to draw attention.
**Other Nominations: Didn't mention them, but it's safe to say he agreed with the wins for Worst Director and Screenplay for given his extensive criticism of both elements.
==References==
Category:Users who joined in 2006
Category:American YouTubers
Category:Review YouTubers