Ursus arctos pyrenaicus

According to Wikipedia this is no longer considered a subspecies, as "DNA evidence" shows only two groups of distinctive enough brown bears to count. This is what I get for not reading the full article before using it as a reference. But it's not like I'm okay with the sole division being based off of unique enough DNA, as I consider the other physical and cultural (their's, not human's) characteristics of the bears to be important enough to count as subspecies. Unless they want to make a sub-category for subspecies. Until then (or until I change my mind), I'm listing this as a subspecies of brown bear. Just as how Wikipedia is rebelling against the science by still listing it as a subspecies and not historically considered subspecies, so too am I listing this as one.
== Distinctions from other subspecies ==
For now, these pictures may help. They are smaller, but still the largest animal alive in Spain. Wikipedian says that their hairs have a yellowish tingehttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subspecies_of_brown_bear&oldid=1132708123, and maybe they do up close. They do have blonde, but most of them seem to be more reddish, especially on the top and sides of the body.https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/wild-brown-bear-cub-spain?assettype=image&sort=mostpopular&phrase=wild%20brown%20bear%20cub%20spain&license=rf%2Crm Around the Pyrenees area the bears have been hybridized with reintroduced Slovenian populations, so they may look different.
== References ==
*