146735-amd-configs-still-performing-badly

== Content ==
			
So me and a bunch of my friends wanted to return to the game.
I got back into the game only to see that I'm getting 25-30 fps average in Thayd and i dip as far as 25 fps in BG's.
I can't say that it's unplayable, but my pc surpasses the minimum req. by far.
My CPU is an FX 6300 and GPU R9 270x and 8 GB of RAM.
It's a mid range budget build and it runs all of the new games at 60 fps medium-high.
This is obviously an optimization problem since Intel cpu's do not encounter as many issues as AMD do.
I know that Intel's are better at single core performance, but the differences aren't this drastic in let's say WoW in which I get 70 fps at worst...
Tried all of the possible tweaks, there really is nothing left to try, believe me.
So after all this ranting, my only question is, does Carbine have any serious plans for improving the performance of this game for us AMD users, since I can bet that most of us use AMD because Intel really is not as efficient as AMD is in price to performance.
I'll still be playing this from time to time, but I can't really commit myself to this game nor spend money on it as long as these issues are not fixed.
I just want to know will this be fixed in some point in the future?	
----
			
{| class="blockquote"
So me and a bunch of my friends wanted to return to the game.
I got back into the game only to see that I'm getting 25-30 fps average in Thayd and i dip as far as 25 fps in BG's.
I can't say that it's unplayable, but my pc surpasses the minimum req. by far.
My CPU is an FX 6300 and GPU R9 270x and 8 GB of RAM.
It's a mid range budget build and it runs all of the new games at 60 fps medium-high.
This is obviously an optimization problem since Intel cpu's do not encounter as many issues as AMD do.
I know that Intel's are better at single core performance, but the differences aren't this drastic in let's say WoW in which I get 70 fps at worst...
Tried all of the possible tweaks, there really is nothing left to try, believe me.
So after all this ranting, my only question is, does Carbine have any serious plans for improving the performance of this game for us AMD users, since I can bet that most of us use AMD because Intel really is not as efficient as AMD is in price to performance.
I'll still be playing this from time to time, but I can't really commit myself to this game nor spend money on it as long as these issues are not fixed.
I just want to know will this be fixed in some point in the future?
----
			people make stuff for amd these days?	
----
			
Yup, I run AMD, pretty high end build and I get max 60fps in a very open area. Probably hover around 25-40 the rest of the time. When I get to illium its between 20-1fps this is on extremely toned down settings that I've spent hours tweaking around with and doing all kinds of fixes.
 
And inb4 omg get nvidia for gaemz amd so bad, I much prefer AMD performance for my working applications and prioritise that over gaming. I was about to buy a gtx 980 especially because of wildstar performance, but then I realised that I was going to waste a lot of money just to have a minor increase in performance as the game will still bottleneck my CPU.
 
Playing wildstar makes me forget just how powerful my PC is, I've been playing fallout 4 and it looks phenomenal and runs like silk on max settings. Or similarly I would go to wow and have stable 60+ frames even in heavy load areas.
 
Wildstar is just very badly optimised and it makes me very sad.... and I am still putting up with it over a year later just cus i'm crazy.	
----
			
{| class="blockquote"
people make stuff for amd these days?
----
			I'm also running into serious performance issues and I'm running a Intel 2500k on 4Ghz with a GeForce GTX680. From one second to another the framerate totally breaks down, e.g. when entering a building. After that it runs smooth again but overall it simply doesn't make fun while playing. 	
----
			
You won't get much higher than 40 to 60 with an AMD I'm afraid - just not optimized for such.
I'm running AMD 9370 8-core at 4.4GHz, 32GB RAM, 4GB AMD R9 290X with a very fast SSD.....not much better than 40fps for me....on lower graphical settings, it's actually worse than on ultra :P  
 
Find the best solution by playing around with all of the options and that'll be as good as it gets.	
----
			
{| class="blockquote"
You won't get much higher than 40 to 60 with an AMD I'm afraid - just not optimized for such.
I'm running AMD 9370 8-core at 4.4GHz, 32GB RAM, 4GB AMD R9 290X with a very fast SSD.....not much better than 40fps for me....on lower graphical settings, it's actually worse than on ultra :P
 
Find the best solution by playing around with all of the options and that'll be as good as it gets.
----