Radical Difference

1     I prepared to move past the barrier
representing the maximum number of breasonings possible. I did this by
translating a breasoning into a different language. First, I wrote down the
breasoning. Second, I wrote down its translation in the second language. Third,
I breasoned out the new cultural object. In this way, I prepared to move past
the barrier representing the maximum number of breasonings possible by
translating a breasoning into a different language.
2     I prepared to observe God (e.g. the
central figure). I did this by performing the Griegian hand-hold. First, I
observed you hold your hand out. Second, I grasped your hand. Third, I wrapped
my fingers around your fingers. In this way, I prepared to observe God (e.g. the
central figure) by performing the Griegian hand-hold.
3     I prepared to watch the wheel rotate
around the centre, to which central spokes were attached. I did this by
watching the steam train’s wheel rotate in a circle. First, I
drew the circle. Second, I drew a line. Third, I split the edge of the circle
into two segments and attached the line to this vertex, and did the same to the
opposite side of the circle. In this way, I prepared to watch the wheel rotate
around the centre, to which central spokes were attached by watching the steam
train’s wheel rotate in a circle.
4     I prepared to be a Nietzschean
scholar. I did this by translating a breasoning into an etymological meaning
(in an ancient language). First, I wrote that five, the etymological meaning of
coin meant that the Queen ordered 5*16=80 breasonings per giver in each
transaction. Second, I knew this also meant that the Queen ordered 5*16=80
breasonings per receiver in each transaction, imitating communication. Third, I
recommended training in the specific department required to gain job and safety
skills. In this way, I prepared to be a Nietzschean scholar by translating a
breasoning into an etymological meaning (in an ancient language).
5    I prepared to differentiate people
by breasoning them out. I did this by radically differentiating myself from
you. First, I looked at myself. Second, I watched you. Third, I noted that you
and I were different people. In this way, I prepared to differentiate people by
breasoning them out by radically differentiated myself from you.
6     I prepared to differentiate objects
by breasoning them out. I did this by radically differentiating a sieve and a
duster. First, I looked at the sieve. Second, I watched the duster. Third, I
noted that the sieve and the duster were different objects. In this way, I
prepared to differentiate objects by breasoning them out by radically
differentiating a sieve and a duster.
7     I prepared to find the next
relationship. I did this by observing the gay man walking with the cancer
sufferer's friend to make the cancer sufferer happy. First, I watched him take
the first step. Second, I watched him prepare to take the next step. Third, I
watched him repeat this until he had walked 10 metres. In this way, I prepared
to find the next relationship by observing the gay man walking with the cancer
sufferer's friend to make the cancer sufferer happy.
8     I prepared to write philosophy
books. I did this by aiming to become a philosophy academic. First, I wrote 1 A
per Bachelor's degree assignment. Second, I wrote 30 As, 15 to the lecturer and
15 As from the lecturer per Honours degree assignment. Third, I wrote 50 As to
the lecturer and 50 As from the lecturer per Master's and PhD degrees'
assignment. In this way, I prepared to write philosophy books by aiming to become
a philosophy academic.
9     I prepared to observe the children
being given presents. I did this by observing the gay man organising to have a
child. First, I observed him selecting the desired properties of the child.
Second, I observed him organising to select the egg and sperm which would
combine to give these properties with the highest probability. Third, I
organised a volunteer surrogate mother to be implanted with the egg that had
been fertilised with the sperm. In this way, 9. I prepared to observe the children
being given presents by observing the gay man organising to have a child.
10   I prepared to organise to have the
Lucianic Meditation degree accredited. I did this by collecting the Lucianic
Meditation degree's pedagogy arguments (e.g. Lucianic writing degree's pedagogy
arguments). First, I collected texts about the mantra and sutra (e..g words).
Second, I collected texts about God (e.g. the master). Third, I collected texts
about the bible (e.g. the book). In this way, I prepared to organise to have the
Lucianic Meditation degree accredited by collecting the Lucianic Meditation
degree's pedagogy arguments (e.g. Lucianic writing degree's pedagogy
arguments).
11    I prepared to offer a Management
course. I did this by collecting the Lucianic Management degree's pedagogy
arguments. First, I collected the first group of subjects. Second, I prepared
to collect the next group of subjects. Third, I repeated this until I had
collected all the groups of subjects. In this way, 1 prepared to offer a
Management course by collecting the Lucianic Management degree's pedagogy
arguments.
12    I prepared to offer a Law course. I
did this by collecting the Lucianic Law degree's pedagogy arguments. First, I
collected the lawsuit subject pedagogy argument. Second, I collected the contract
law subject pedagogy argument. Third, I collected the LM legal governance
subject pedagogy argument. In this way, I prepared to offer a Law course by
collecting the Lucianic Law degree's pedagogy arguments.
13    I prepared to offer an Education
course. I did this by collecting the Lucianic Pedagogy degree's pedagogy
arguments. First, I collected the design subject pedagogy argument. Second, I
collected the delivery subject pedagogy argument. Third, I collected the
assessment subject pedagogy argument. In this way, I prepared to offer an
Education course by collecting the Lucianic Pedagogy degree's pedagogy
arguments.
14    I prepared to go for a walk. I did
this by drinking the cup of water. First, I picked up the cup. Second, I lifted
it to my lips. Third, I drank from it. In this way, I prepared to go for a walk
by drinking the cup of water.
15   I prepared to take the person to a
safe place. I did this by negotiating an agreement with my opponent. First, I
verified whether I agreed with the first sentence. Second, I prepared to verify
whether I agreed with the next sentence. Third, I repeated this until I had
agreed with a sentence. In this way, I prepared to take the person to a safe
place by negotiating an agreement with my opponent.
16    I prepared to write about the master's
conclusion. I, a philosopher did this by agreeing with God (e.g. the master).
First, I opened the envelope. Second, I took out the master's conclusion.
Third, I agreed with it. In this way, I prepared to write about the master's
conclusion by agreeing with God (e.g. the master).
17    I prepared to verify the writing. I
did this by meditating on (e.g. writing about) God (e.g. the master). First, I
opened the volume. Second, I opened the volume at the correct chapter. Third, I
wrote about the master's chapter's title. In this way, I prepared to verify the
writing by meditating on (e.g. writing about) God (e.g. the master).
18    I prepared to order Conglish. I did
this by passing the assignment by using pedagogy. First, I researched the
author’s text. Second, I researched the
secondary texts about this text. Third, I connected comments on quotes from
these secondary texts as my argument. In this way, I prepared to order Conglish
by passing the assignment by using pedagogy.
19    I prepared to publish the article in
a journal. I did this by determining that Lucianic Meditation (writing about
the philosopher Lucian) worked. First, I verified that the writer had better
movement in her body from drinking four glasses of water 45 minutes before
breakfast, as suggested in the Lucianic text. Second, I performed a double
blind experiment, in which neither the subjects nor the experiments were aware
of the of the critical aspects of the experiment. Third I submitted the
research to peer reviewers. In this way, I prepared to publish the article in a
journal by determining that Lucianic Meditation (writing about the philosopher
Lucian) worked.
20   I prepared to verify the sentence. I
did this by rebutting to the objection in the critical thinking subject. First,
I held the shop sign. Second, I found it too heavy (e.g. I sang a song). Third,
I pushed its post into the ground. In this way, I prepared to verify the
sentence by rebutting to the objection in the critical thinking subject.
21    I prepared to be democratic. I did
this by awarding agreement and disagreement (rebutting to the objection) the
same mark. First, I wrote the sentence agreeing with the thesis statement.
Second, I wrote the sentence disagreeing (e.g. agreeing) with the thesis
statement. Third, I gave these two sentences the same mark. In this way, I
prepared to be democratic by awarding agreement and disagreement (rebutting to
the objection) the same mark.
22   I prepared to perform the
negotiation. I did this by writing about disagreement as having the seen-as
version of rebutting to an objection (e.g agreeing). First, I found the person.
Second, I found her agreeing. Third, I agreed with her. In this way, I prepared
to perform the negotiation by writing about disagreement as having the seen-as
version of rebutting to an objection (e.g agreeing).
23   I prepared to pass the essay. I did
this by exposing the idea of God in the first half of the essay. First, I found
the word God in the primary text. Second, I agreed with the idea. Third, I
wrote this in the first half of the essay. In this way, I prepared to pass the
essay by exposing the idea of God in the first half of the essay.
24   I prepared to write a new essay
argument. I did this by writing new connections in the essay. First, I wrote
the first sentence, first sentence in the second half and a connection between
them. Second, I prepared to do this with the next two sentences after these.
Third, I repeated this until I had finished the whole essay. In this way, I
prepared to write a new essay argument by writing new connections in the essay.
25   I prepared to breason out an
argument for a particular developed thing. I did this by writing a breasoning
list. First, I wrote the algorithm description list. Second, I wrote the
expanded algorithms. Third, I reduced each line of each algorithm to a breasoning
list. In this way, I prepared to breason out an argument for a particular
developed thing by writing a breasoning list.
26   I prepared to disagree (e.g. agree)
with the jointure and write a rhizome. I did this by joining breasonings to
ideas in the area of study to write the essay. First, I wrote the breasoning “I
programmed the story maker using the computer”. Second, I wrote the idea the person followed
the vascular-like halls in the building to reach the exit. Third, I wrote that
I printed the pathways through the building’s vasculature, like writing a story, on
computer. In this way, I prepared to disagree (e.g. agree) with the jointure
and write a rhizome by joining breasonings to ideas in the area of study to
write the essay.
27   I prepared to write how Chinese
characters are interesting. I did this by devising an alternative idea about a
Chinese character’s radical. First, I wrote the
character女子, meaning good. Second, I wrote its first radical, 女, meaning woman. Third, I wrote an alternative meaning for女, nothingness. In this way, I prepared to write how Chinese
characters are interesting by devising an alternative idea about a Chinese
character’s radical.
28   I prepared to protected people from
being murdered (e.g. guided people on a positive path in life). I did this by
simulating a friendly house by inviting many people around. First, I invited
the ontology-bearer, where ontologies contain arguments. Second, I invited the
algorithm-bearer, where algorithms process ontologies. Third, I invited the
argument-bearer, where arguments are responses to the area of study that have
rhizomes as reasons. In this way, I prepared to protected people from being
murdered (e.g. guided people on a positive path in life) by simulating a
friendly house by inviting many people around.
29   I prepared to write on the bible. I
did this by agreeing, not disagreeing, in theology. First, I found the instance
of God (e.g. the master). Second, I found his statement. Third, I agreed with
it. In this way, I prepared to write on the bible by agreeing, not disagreeing,
in theology.
30   I prepared to help actors earn
money. I did this by forming an acting agency. First, I found actors. Second, I
found roles. Third, I applied actors for roles. In this way, I prepared to help
actors earn money by forming an acting agency.
31    I prepared to identify multiple
roots. I did this by identifying the radical (root) of life. First, I
identified the first (root) thought. Second, I identified the second thought.
Third, I identified the third thought. In this way, I prepared to identify
multiple roots by identifying the radical (root) of life.
32   I prepared to go to heaven (e.g.
walking on dry land). I did this by identifying the difference in life. First,
I identified the sailor. Second, I identified him on the boat. Third, I
identified him walking on land. In this way, I prepared to go to heaven (e.g.
walking on dry land) by identifying the difference in life.
33    I prepared to define a contention
and write arguments for and against a side. 
I did this by writing 8 area of study points.  First, I wrote that 8 was the minimum number
of area of study points.  Second, I
connected these in an argument structure. 
Third, I applied that area of philosophy to the ideas.  In this way, I prepared to define a
contention and write arguments for and against a side by writing 8 area of
study points.
34   I prepared to debate the
algorithm.  I did this by writing 95 area
of study points.  First, I wrote the
reason, objection, rebuttal and connection with a previous reason or objection
in that paragraph.  Second, I repeated
this for 5 reasons per paragraph.  Third,
I repeated this for 5 paragraphs.  In
this way, I prepared to debate the algorithm by writing 95 area of study
points.
35   I prepared to compare breasonings
currency subject with the idea.  I did
this through radical verificationism. 
First, I compared the breasonings currency subject with sex.  Second, I looked at the rod.  Third, I prevented it from entering the void.  In this way, I prepared to compare
breasonings currency subject with the idea through radical verificationism.
36   I prepared to write on different
contentions.  I did this through examinationism.  First, I examined the reason.  Second, I examined it further.  Third, I examined it one more time.  In this way, I prepared to write on different
contentions through examinationism.
37   I prepared to be a writer.  I did this by studying short courses
throughout my life and writing a maximum of 80 breasonings per day per
student.  First, I write 13 and 1/3
paragraphs per day.  Second, I stated
each of these contained 6 sentences. 
Third, I wrote this equalled 80 breasonings.  In this way, I prepared to be a writer by
studying short courses throughout my life and writing a maximum of 80 breasonings
per day per student.
38   I prepared to make fine
distinctions.  I did this by writing a
maximum of 80 breasonings per day per actor in the production.  First, I breasoned out 10 breasonings per
each of the 10 characters.  Second, I attributed
the other breasonings to Aigs (I asked the acting agents to work on them).  Third, I breasoned out 80 breasonings per day
for everyone, to keep their heads comfortable. 
In this way, I prepared to make fine distinctions by writing a maximum
of 80 breasonings per day per actor in the production.
39    I prepared to affirm that I was well.  I did this by writing academic aims for some
arguments.  First, I wrote the academic
aim.  Second, I wrote the argument for it.  Third, I connected molyhedrons (sic) and the
antipsychotic medication.  In this way, I
prepared to affirm that I was well by writing academic aims for some arguments.
40   I prepared to dress the perspective
for excavation.  I did this by writing industry
aims for some arguments.  First, I wrote
the movie.  Second, I wrote the
play.  Third, I wrote the song.  In this way, I prepared to dress the
perspective for excavation by writing industry aims for some arguments.
41    I prepared to promote my books.  I did this by reading the arguments’ statistics. 
First, I wrote a essay of the most popular arguments.  Second, I wrote a secondary text of the most
popular arguments.  Third, I wrote a
translation of the most popular arguments. 
In this way, I prepared to promote my books by reading the arguments’ statistics. 
42   I prepared to solve the other writer’s ideas in my writing.  I did this by preventing theft of my arguments.  First, I read my ideas.  Second, I read the ideas written by the other
writer.  Third, I verified that each set
was unique.  In this way, I prepared to solve
the other writer’s ideas in my writing by preventing
theft of my arguments.
Secondary
Texts
Socrates,
bible
1.     I prepared to clean up God (e.g. the
master).  I did this by rinsing the
cup.  First, I held the cup.  Second, I placed the cup under the flowing
water.  Third, I rinsed the cup.  In this way, I prepared to clean up God (e.g.
the master) by rinsing the cup.
2.    I prepared to use the evidence to
use energy to swim in the pool.  I did
this by eating the currant bun.  First, I
bit the currant bun.  Second, I chewed
the mouthful.  Third, I swallowed the
mouthful.  In this way, I prepared to use
the evidence to use energy to swim in the pool by eating the currant bun.
Plato,
bible
1.     I prepared to identify syllogistical
radical difference.  I did this by
agreeing with Socrates.  First, I found Socrates.  Second, I found his statement.  Third, I agreed with his statement.  In this way, I prepared to identify
syllogistical radical difference by agreeing with Socrates.
2.    I prepared to identify formistical
radical difference.  I did this by
agreeing with Plato.  First, I found Plato.  Second, I found his statement.  Third, I agreed with his statement.  In this way, I prepared to identify formistical
radical difference by agreeing with Plato.
Aristotle,
bible
1.     I prepared to support a student
breasoning an idea out.  I did this by commissioning
Computer Science to write a clear thinking A. 
First, I wrote down the correct course of action.  Second, I wrote down a clear reason for
it.  Third, I performed it.  In this way, I prepared to support a student
breasoning an idea out by commissioning Computer Science to write a clear
thinking A.
2.    I prepared to.  I did this by mathematically verifying the
correlation using statistics.  First, I determined
that the critical Z score values when using a 95% confidence interval are -1.96
and +1.96 standard deviations.  Second, I
determined that the p-value associated with a 95% confidence level is 0.05.  Third, I determined that I could reject my
null hypothesis (that there is no correlation between the variables of a set of
features), so proving that there is a correlation between the variables of a
set of features because the Z score is not between -1.96 and +1.96 and the
p-value is less than 0.05, rather than being unable to reject my null hypothesis
because the Z score is between -1.96 and +1.96 and the p-value is greater than
0.05.
Nietzsche,
bible
1.     I prepared to perfectly program
radicalism.  I did this by verifying
radicalism.  First, I found the root of philosophy.  Second, I wrote it down.  Third, I verified it.  In this way, I prepared to perfectly program
radicalism by verifying radicalism.
2.    I prepared to find the most
important radical difference.  I did this
by verifying difference.  First, I found
the first value.  Second, I found the
second value.  Third, I verified their
difference.  In this way, I prepared to
find the most important radical difference by verifying difference.
Wittgenstein,
bible
1.     I prepared to love God (e.g. the
master).  I did this by identifying God
(e.g. the master).  First, I found the
master and slave pair.  Second, I
identified the master.  Third, I wrote
down the master’s name. 
In this way, I prepared to love God (e.g. the master) by identifying God
(e.g. the master).
2.    I prepared to return home with the
leader.  I did this by identifying the
religious leader who the deity originated from (e.g. the follower who the
leader led).  First, I identified the
leader.  Second, I identified the
follower of the leader.  Third, I wrote
down the follower’s name. 
In this way, I prepared to return home with the leader by identifying
the religious leader who the deity originated from (e.g. the follower who the
leader led).
Incomplete Critical Essay
Radical difference is seeing two sides of a debate clearly. One should choose a side. Once finished, the opposition between the two sides represents the radical difference.
The diagram represents the two perspectives on the debate being represented as rays (on opposite sides) from the centre (of importance) of the circle.
opposition: 
you – antithesis
hand - polarity
a breasoning from a different language - difference
wheel - opposition
a breasoning from an ancient language - contrast
two sides of a debate
choose a side. 
two perspectives 
rays (on opposite sides) 
centre (of importance) 
Paragraph 1
I did this by radically differentiating myself from you. 
I did this by performing the Griegian hand-hold. 
I did this by translating a breasoning into a different language.
I did this by watching the steam train’s wheel rotate in a circle. 
I did this by translating a breasoning into an etymological meaning (in an ancient language). 
you - hand
- a breasoning in a different language
- wheel
- a breasoning in an ancient language
What is the objection to A?
The antithesis (where the antithesis is represented by you, a philosopher, disagreeing) shouldn’t work because you placed a sign on the ground preventing tripping over.
What is the rebuttal to this objection to A?
The subject shouldn’t trip over the sign.
What is the connection between this rebuttal to A and the thesis statement? ***
What is the objection to B?  
Polarity (where polarity is represented by a hand holding a safety rail) shouldn’t work because of slipping underneath the safety rail.
What is the rebuttal to this objection to B?
The subject shouldn’t slip underneath the safety rail because of being blocked by a guide rail.
What is the connection between these rebuttals to B and A?
The subject shouldn’t trip over the sign by slipping underneath the safety rail where he is blocked by a guide rail.
What is the objection to C? 
Difference (where difference is translating a breasoning into a different language) shouldn’t work because a jigsaw puzzle piece from one language wouldn’t fit into the same type of jigsaw from a different language.
What is the rebuttal to this objection to C? 
The subject’s jigsaw puzzle piece from one language should fit into the same type of jigsaw from a different language because of being photographed and printed at the correct size.
What is the connection between these rebuttals to C and B? 
The guide rail should be the correct size to block the subject from slipping underneath.
What is the objection to D?
The opposition (where the opposition is represented by the action and reaction forces of the wheel pressing against the road and the road pressing on the wheel) doesn’t work because a.
What is the rebuttal to this objection to D?
The subject shouldn’t encounter a sinkhole appearing in the road because of following directions around the hole.
What is the connection between these rebuttals to D and A?
The subject shouldn’t trip over the sign at the sinkhole appearing in the road because of sidestepping the sign and hole.
What is the objection to E? 
Contrast (where contrast is revealed by translating a breasoning from an ancient language) shouldn’t work because writing on a wax writing tablet wouldn’t survive the time from the second century until the modern era.
What is the rebuttal to this objection to E?
The wax writing tablet should be preserved with an ivory backing in a glass urn of wine, from the time from the second century until the modern era (2015 AD).
What is the connection between these rebuttals to E and D?
The subject shouldn’t encounter a sinkhole appearing in the road because of following directions around the hole because the wax writing tablet should be preserved with an ivory backing in a glass urn of wine, from the time from the second century until the modern era (2015 AD), where 
Avoiding a hole in the road is similar to avoiding a time capsule containing a wax tablet in a glass urn of wine, from the time from the second century until the modern era (2015 AD).