Critical Hit

Welcome to Critical Hit, where reviewing articles made by you guys is the basic gist. Here, you guys request articles made by yourself for me to review, and I...well, I review them. So, yeah, I review stuff. I'm not one for nitpicking-I state what the page's genuine problems are, and I state their perfections. At the end of each review, I give each article a medal based off of grading. So, yeah. Requests started on December 14, 2015, as a member of the League of Fantendo Critics 2.0.
==Score System==
There are seven different ranking one of these games can get. They are...
*- The article sucks. That's all.
*- The article is mostly pretty bad, but it has a few redeeming elements.
*- The article is teetering on the brink of badness, but with a few things holding it back to save it.
*- The article has lots of good things and lots of not good things. It's in the middle.
*- The game is really great, with a problem here and there that holds it back somewhat.
*- The only problems are nitpicks, and the article is overall really well done.
*- The article is virtually perfect in every way.
==Reviewed Articles==
*
==Requests==
This is the list of all of the articles I am going to review. To request, just add it to the page.
*Super Smash Bros. Dispute
*Paper Mario: The Ancient Book
*Sonic Blur: Episode α
*Dark Woods (series) / a game of the series
*Radioactive
*Heroforce
*Umbrella Waffle
*~Wild World~
*Mr. Know It All
*Fantendo - Gaiden
*Sonic Adventure 3
*Hope Without A Cause
*Elementals
*Super Smash Bros. Violet Sunset
*Mario Kart Double Dash: All Powered Up!
Category:League of Fantendo Critics
Category:League of Fantendo Critics 2.0