Why is BFI not on Idea Wiki?

Battle for Indianapolis (BFI) is an animated web series on MePipe, created by Sam Anderson. With the series having billions of views, you might be surprised to learn that there is no Idea Wiki article on it. This essay explains why those pages were deleted, along with its history. If you are new to Idea Wiki, then this essay is for you. But if you are more experienced, you can also read this as a case study on some of Idea Wiki's policies, like which articles are kept, the purpose of Idea Wiki and what Idea Wiki is not, and disruptive conduct. 
One of the reasons 'BFI' articles are deleted is because there is a system that decides whether or not a topic should have an article. Being popular doesn't always mean an article about it should be made. What is important is whether 'BFI' has received a lot of coverage in reliable, independent sources, such as news articles. Without good sources, we wouldn't be able to make articles accurate and neutral. 
Don't be mean to people for 'BFI'. The creators of 'BFI' even published a video titled "Let's keep BFI casual" to remind viewers and fans to not take the series too seriously.
==Background==
Battle for Indianapolis (2010–present, abbreviated BFI) is an animated web series on MePipe created by zacknzellify, a channel owned by Sam Anderson. The web series takes place in a series of contests where anthropomorphic characters compete for a prize. Viewers of this series can vote on which contestant would be eliminated in the next episode. The series inspired a genre of animated web series known as "character shows".
==Policies and guidelines==
Pages about BFI were deleted for many reasons. Firstly, BFI articles do not meet our criteria on whether we should have an article or not. Secondly, pages were being used as a webhost for content that is not related to Idea Wiki. Lastly, many people have agreed to delete these types of pages.
===Introduction===
On Idea Wiki, articles must have a neutral point of view. This is one of Idea Wiki's fundamental five principles. Idea Wiki's notability system is crafted around this concept. There should be enough sources for us to see what the significant points of view on a topic are. For example, if there is multiple reviews published about BFI, we can talk about what the critics liked and what people thought of BFI.
It is also important that the reviews/sources are reliable. Websites like Fandom, where anyone can post anything, are unreliable because you can abuse it. People who hate BFI can just write negative reviews on the show, and its BFI article would say "this show have been considered the worst by critics". Obviously, this would not be true. This is why sources need to be reliable. A reputable publication would see if the review came from a professional critic and if they are being honest.
However, there are no reliable articles or reviews talking about BFI, and basing a Idea Wiki article on unreliable sources is a bad idea since unreliable sources can be manipulated.