Nettie Machete/Court Cases

==Court Cases==
[Docket] The State v. Nettie Machete (01-29-24)	[Docket] The State v. Nettie Machete (01-29-24) 	 	
Photo 	 	 	
Incident Name 	Nettie Machete - Mayhem, Unauthorized Practice of Medicine 	 	
Judge(s) 	Adrienne West 	 	
Victim(s)/Witness(es) 	Quimbley Hayabusa, Monroe Grier, Carl Wheezer, Beavis Johnson, Bernard Dinks, Tobi Riggs, Isaiah Mavrick 	 	
Verdict 	Mayhem removed from charges by Salvatore Greco due to a lack of evidence. Case dismissed from the docket by Justice Adrienne West.	 	
Charges 	
{| class="mw-collapsible article-table" style="width: 100%" 	Total (2)	Total (2)
Mayhem x1 	$30,000.00, 30 years 	 	
Unlawful Practice of Medicine x1 	$400.00, ??? months 	 	
Total Fees/Time 	N/A 	 	
[CIVIL] Nettie Machete et al. Vs The State (03-17-24)	[CIVIL] Nettie Machete et al. Vs The State (03-17-24)	 	
Judge(s) 	Tiberius Schwinghammer 	 	
Plaintiff(s) 	Nettie MacheteSean Heather 	 	
Defendant(s) 	The State (Salvatore Greco) 	 	
Finding 	For Nettie Machete & Sean Heather 	 	
Claim 	
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed article-table" style="width: 100%"	Statement of Claim	Statement of Claim
Ms. Machete was charged with a Class A Felony on 1/14/2024. Ms. Machete was held on bail for 16 days and was prohibited from working her job as a Paramedic during that time.
On the 16th of January The District Attorney's office issued a press release revealing the details of Ms. Machete's charges.
On the 22nd of January Sean Heather was added as a Co-Defendant with the charge of Mayhem. He turned himself in, and was able to be released under bail conditions, and was not allowed to work as a paramedic for that time due to special conditions that the DA's Office put on both defendants.
On January 26th Mr. Heather's charge of Mayhem was dropped.
On January 29th the charge of Mayhem against Ms. Machete was dropped.
On January 30th the Docketed Case was dropped.
The State pressed charges against the Plaintiffs. Only to realize that there was not any evidence 24 hours before the trial was to be held. This is not the first time The State has engaged in this tactic, (Re: The State v James Jugglen et al.)
Therefore, in addition to lost wages, the Plaintiffs will be seeking further punitive damages to help illustrate to The State that the violation of due process is not a mechanism for The State to exploit.	 	 	
Category:Subpages