Fanon Talk:Metapotence/@comment-30165589-20171003142429/@comment-29564364-20171120171801

@DeathstroketheHedgehog
I reject Author Authority's first, second, fifth and seventh limitations because they do not follow from the first and second paragraphs of the capabilities. If Authors have the same absolute power and overwhelming authority as their writers, then nothing within their verse can oppose them in the same way that nothing within a work of fiction can oppose its writer's will. And my argument remains logically sound if we replace Omnipotence with 4th Wall Breaching, Omnilock, Origin Transcendence, Non Created Physiology and/or Authority Manipulation.
«Meta Art Manipulation is literally a part of what Omnipotence does, hence Complete Arsenal.»
That argument is pretty much meaningless as that can be said of every power. And even then, it would depend on a case by case basis.
@Nekron2
«Application means the power may or may not be applicaple to a user [...]»
No. To paraphrase the Page Creation and Details page, applications are powers that most users could use with minimal training; the basic set.
«[...] author authority itself is an application of omnipotence remember that.Many powers like omniarch,etc have this as an application.»
Omnipotence Embodiment, Author Authority and Reality Dreaming are listed under "Omnipotent Abilities," not "Applications." Omnipotent abilities are not applications of Omnipotence, but rather powers that give access to it. In other words, Omnipotence is an application of those powers, not the other way around.
«You said Variation of omnipotence embodiment, i.e, similar to something.»
Yes, they are similar in that they fit the description of the base power in some way. Rare are the variations that don't.