Argument from Fallacy

Argument from Fallacy
Definition: The argument fallacy is when someone states that because there is a fallacy in a statement or argument, that argument is false based on the fact that it contains a fallacy. Moreover, when someone uses this fallacy, they argue that another person's argument or claim is false if it contains a fallacy. Most times, people use fallacies in his/her argument due to lack of evidence, and this use of fallacies can be used as a rebuttal against the person's argument because it shows that the person who used a fallacy in their argument was not able to correctly defend his/her claim. Using a fallacy does not mean the person's claim is necessarily false, but it shows that the person does not use enough evidence to support their statement is true. 
'''
Structure: Argument A contains a fallacy--> Therefore, the claim or statement of Argument A is false.
'''
Example --> Person 1: I can't go to the movies at night because if I do, I will become a unicorn.
Person 2: That's ridiculous. You are stupid and idiotic.
Person 1: Your statement contains and ad hominem fallacy by you calling me stupid and idiotic. Therefore, I am not stupid or idiotic.
'''
Example 2--> All dogs have ears. My brother Bobby has ears. Therefore, he is a dog.
By stating the affirmative the consequent fallacy, your brother is not a dog. 
'''
Example from a TV show:  Chandler  from Friends uses circular reasoning to explain why he can’t go running: 
Chandler- “It’s Sunday morning. I’m not running on a Sunday.” 
Monica- “Why not?”
Chandler: “Because it’s Sunday.” 
Monica: “Hey! You tell me when to stop.”
Chandler: “Stop.”
Monica: “We can’t stop!”
By using circular reasoning to support his claim, his statement that he can’t run is false. He could run any day of the week, but just doesn’t want to. Monica disregards his statement and continues to persuade him. 
'''
The first picture uses a hasty generalization fallacy when the blue frog jumps to the conclusion that the green frog is calling him Senile and also when he jumps to the conclusion that the green frog finds fame to be more important than science, when in fact the green frog did not say so. 
The second picture uses an ad hominem attack. Therefore, under the argument from fallacy, the green frog’s argument is false.