Theological Upheaval Refuted

-Arriving at a wrong theological position does not invalidate STrict PK, not if you ask God and a solid answer comes.
-EAch step in progress is technically wrong except for the last one, but that doesn't change the fact that they are all advances towartds the fullness of truth.
-
-In order for Time-Machine Critique to be pragmatic, God would have to immeiately give us the fullness of truth right off the bat, essentially having us be born with all theological knowledge. Otherwise, there'd be something we are holding onto that is theologically incorrect!
-
-Holding on to or arriving at theological falsehood does not disprove Strict PK. We trust in God's goodness. It's only if we ask God a question and get the wrong answe, then things are FUBAR.
>Even then, we recognize that while truths given will never be proven wrong, that's not the same thing as realizing they are smaller parts of a much greater truth.
-
-The nature of progress?
-
=== Theological Upheaval Opens Door To The Darkness: ===
-Call it what you will, TU combined with Time-Machine Critique (and Theological Upheaval naturally flows into TM-C) inevitably leads to the idea that you can follow NT, ask God for guidance, and still arrive at a wrong answer. 
-
Category:Theism
Category:Infinity Theology