A Guide to Rationality, from Basic to Advanced

This is meant to outline and link to a series of tutorials on the subject of rationality. It will cover more breadth and depth than my current page on Thinking Skills.
Stuff in non-final order for now:
Part 0, (Optional) Why this is a thing:
* What we are
* Why we (decide to, or must) do things (like this)
Part 1, Working on our Knowledge:
* Basics of Epistemology
* Basics of Analytical Thought:
** language, semantics, logic
* More advanced Epistemology
Part 2, Thinking of what to do, Problem Solving, etc.:
* Means-Ends Chains
* Goal Oriented Strategy (far end of chain)
* Opportunity Oriented Strategy (near end of chain)
* knowledge, expertise is important
* "brainstorming" all possible forms of solution (refer to "variables" in critical thinking)
* hybridizing the two strategies
* Paved with good intentions
Part 3, Changing Minds (the right ways):
* communication, what can and can't be communicated
* the science
* my method:
** how I think mind-changing works
** need everyone on as much of the same epistemology as possible
*** helping other people excel at rationality (like teaching them this guide, how to figure out what is true, how to problem solve and plan, and how to changing others minds)
** need everyone on common semantics
** need everyone to be able to articulate each others positions deeply
** need to understand the values and psychology involved
** explore for the underlying or core points
** use thorough Bayesian Reasoning on those points (finding and using all the relevant facts and logic)
** re-reading your own replies, compare it to what you are responding to, look for logical ways of avoiding your own criticism
** Steelmanning, balancing hardcore logic with charitable lenience (to intuition, correctable errors etc.)
** repeat the process if necessary.  Never stop the steps of understanding each other, or else it will derail
* spectrums: highly certain to highly speculative, highly obvious to highly expertise-intensive (and in easier less-risky situations you can get away with less intense methodology)
Part 4, Changing Minds (the wrong ways):
* methods that shouldn't work
* the social aspects of disagreement
* the meta conflict, conflicting theories of how to handle conflict:
** propagandists 
** "post-rationalists" 
** stagnant conflict avoiders 
** abusiveness 
** dogmatists 
** assumption stacking (VS exploration) 
* posers, "just asking questions", fake or manipulative rationalism
* how we should handle all of the above and related issues