Proportional voting

== Backfired on powerful, so plug gets pulled.==
* Proportional voting system phased out article in the PG on November 14, 2004. Header: Cities did away with it because it gave prolitical minorities too much power.
== Nourishing the world of opportunities to expand and grow from within.== 
Our one person one vote mentality makes a cornerstone to what should occur in our democracy. There are many of other styles, reasons, types of questions and opportunities that should be part of our mix. We have a limited tool box that can expand if we had people in power pushing for those expansions to occur.
Proportional voting may seem alien to voters in the United States. But consider proportional voting in instances where policies are impacted. We can also vote, not for the person, but the answers. Why not have the question of changing the county charter for row office reform be more than a Yea or No question? There are 10 row offices. How about if we asked people how many row offices should remain as elected offices and go from 0 to 10 as options. Then the cluster of replies could be studied.
== Expect new elements for the fabric of the democratic experience. ==
* As mayor, new styles of voting, polling and input would come to our political landscape. Regular votes are not to be hijacked, rather, new insights can be obtained in other styles about issues.
== Software utility, eVote, handles proportional voting and even percentage voting==
Percentage votes are another type of decision making. Many alternatives are available with eVote