Query: Phys. Rev. B 20, 326 (1979).

Candidate papers:

abstract: Quantum photoyield and secondary electron distributions are presented for an unreconstructed diamond (111) surface (type \mathrm{II}b$ gem quality blue white semiconductor) This chemically inert surface exhibits a negative electron affinity, resulting in a stable quantum yield that increases linearly from photothreshold (5.5 eV) to \ensuremath{\sim}20% at 9 eV, with a very large yield of \ensuremath{\sim}40% 70% for $13\ensuremath{\lesssim}h\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\lesssim}35$ eV. For all photon energies, secondary electron energy distributions show a dominant \ensuremath{\sim}0.5 eV wide emission peak at the conduction band minimum \ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}{min}=5.50\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ eV above the valence band maximum \ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}\ensuremath{ In contrast with recent self consistent calculations [J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 17, 769 (1978) no occupied intrinsic surface states with ionization energies in the fundamental gap (the Fermi level was 1 eV above \ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}\ensuremath{ were observed. Likewise, the measured photothreshold {E}_{\mathrm{vac}\ensuremath{ \ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}\ensuremath{ is significantly smaller than calculated (7.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7 eV)
author_names: Franz J Himpsel

James Arthur Knapp

J A Vanvechten

Dean Eric Eastman
title: Quantum photoyield of diamond(111) A stable negative affinity emitter
year: 1979

abstract: The configuration space properties of the pair correlation function in the Singwi Tosi Land Sjolander approximation scheme for a two dimensional one component plasma are derived here, using the exact solution in k space in Paper I (Phys. Rev. A 20, 329 (1979) We also study in detail the effective static potential around a test particle for three cases representing weak, intermediate, and strong coupling.
author_names: Pradip M Bakshi

R Calinon

Kenneth I Golden

Gabor J Kalman

Danilo Merlini
title: Exact two dimensional plasma pair correlation function in the Singwi Tosi Land Sjolander approximation. II. Configuration space analysis
year: 1979

abstract: Abstract We propose a new atom surface interaction potential model which is designed for use in the recent exact theory for the elastic scattering of an atom by a hard corrugated surface model which incorporates a stationary attractive potential well [N. Garcia, F.O. Goodman, V. Celli and N.R. Hill, Phys. Rev. B (1979) The model parameters are adjusted to obtain a best fit to all available experimental data on atom surface bound state energies, and comparisons are also made with the latest theoretical data, with satisfactory results.
author_names: Frank O Goodman

Nicolas Garcia

Vittorio Celli
title: Model of the interaction potential of an atom with a hard corrugated surface incorporating a stationary potential well
year: 1979

abstract: Take a good look at these photographs; eventually they will probably be in many textbooks. These photographs represent visual evidence for macroscopic quantization in rotating supertluid helium and are the latest in a series of experiments by Richard Packard and his collaborators at the University of California, Berkeley. E. J. Yarmchuk, M. J. V. Gordon and Packard recently published these pictures in Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 214 (1979) These patterns display the model structure of the stationary states of a single macroscopic wave function describing superfluidity.
author_names: Gloria B Lubkin
title: Stationary Vortex Arrays
year: 1979

abstract: AC Electroluminescence in Thin Film ZnSe:Mn. J. Shah and A. E. DiGiovanni, Appl. Phys. Lett. 33 (Dec 15, 1978) pp. 995 7. Allowed Character of the 1900AA Band Borazine. M. B. Robin and N. A. Kuebler, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 70, No. 3 (Jun 1, 1978) pp. 472 5. Aluminum Gallium Arsenide (DH) Pump Laser for Photoluminescence Lifetime Measurements. R. J. Nelson, Rev. Sc. Instnim. 49, No. 12 (Dec 1978) pp. 6103 8. Analysis of Tin Nickel Electroplate by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, Ion Scattering, Spectrometry, and Rutherford Backeca tiering. R. Schubert, J. Elec trochem. Soc. 125, No. 8 (Aug 1978) pp. 1215 8. Analytic Approximations for the Fermi Energy in (Aluminum, Gallium) Arsen ide. W. B. Joyce, Appl. Phys. Lett, 32, No. 10 (May 15, 1978) pp. 680 1. Angle Resolved Photoe mission from Surfaces and Adsorbates. I. V. Smith, J. Phys. (Paris) 39, No. 4 (1978) p. 161. Cadmium Sulfide/Indium Phosphide and Cadmium Sulfide/Gallium Arsenide C etc rojunctions by Chemical Vapor Deposition of Cadmium Sulfide. M. Bettini, K. J. Bachmann, and J. L. Shay, J. Appl. Phys. 49, No. 2 (Feb 1978) pp. 865 70. Chemical Kinetics of the Reactions of SiCLSiBr< GeCL, POC1, and BC| a with Oxygen. W. G. French, L. J. Pace, and V. A. Foertmeyer, J. Phys. Chem. 82, No. 20 (Oct 1978) pp. 2191 4. Comparative Study of Annealed Neon, Argon, Krypton, Ion Implanted Damage in Silicon. A. G. Cuius, T. E. Seidel, and R. L. Meek, J. Appl. Phys. 49, No. 10 (Oct 1978) pp. 5188 98. Compton Profile of Lithium Hydride. W. A. Reed, Phys. Rev. B, 18 (1978) p. 1986. The Compton Profile of Urea. W. A. Reed, L. C. Snyder, H. J. Guggenheim, T. A. Weber, and Z. R. Wasserman, J. Chem. Phys. 69, No. 1 (Jul 1, 1978) pp. 288 96. Copper Chloride: More Facts Generate More Thoughts on High Temperature Superconductivity. J. A. Wilson, Phil. Mag. B, 38 (1978) pp. 427 44. Core Hole Screening in Lanthanide Metals. G. Crecelius, G. K. Wertheim, D. I. E. Buchanan. Phys. Rev. B. 18, No. 12 (Dec 15, 1978) pp. 6519 24.
author_names: Thomas E Seidel
title: Papers by bell laboratories authors
venue: The Bell System Technical Journal
year: 1979

author_names: N David Mermin
title: Erratum: Erratum: Crystalline order in two dimensions [Phys. Rev. 176, 250 (1968) [Phys. Rev. B 20, 4762 (1979)
year: 2006

abstract: In the GROMACS code modifications, instead of the nanometer unit for the distance that is standard in GROMACS, a unit of 1 A was previously assumed. This led to dipole dipole interactions between amide I vibrations at different sites and the interaction energies of the amide I vibration with the protein hydrogen bonds being overestimated, respectively, by three orders and by one order of magnitude. In addition, the quantum mechanical force terms were overestimated because, through the same error, the sites defined as hydrogen bonded in the protein were not properly identified. Because the influence of the quantum vibration on the conformation of the polypeptide is less pronouncedwhen these errors are corrected, the simulation times are increased to 10 ps. Moreover, each of the 20 simulation runs, obtained by varying the seed of the random number generator for the initial velocities, was repeated ten times in order to sample different quantumMonte Carlo paths and to yield better statistical estimates. Thus, the results presented here, for each value of kh represent averages over 200 simulation trajectories. Two other changes are made in the current modified GROMACS code. The first of these makes sure that the interaction energy term varies continuously with the length of the hydrogen bond, even when the hydrogen bond breaks. This term is calculated as
author_names: Holly Freedman

Paulo J Martel

Leonor Cruzeiro
title: Erratum: Mixed quantum classical dynamics of an amide I vibrational excitation in a protein a helix [Phys. Rev. B 82, 174308 (2010)
year: 2011

abstract: A. Abdel Rehim, C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, Ch. Kallidonis, B. Kostrzewa, G. Koutsou, M. Mangin Brinet, M. Oehm, G. C. Rossi, C. Urbach, U. Wenger Computation based Science and Technology Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 20 Kavafi Str. Nicosia 2121, Cyprus Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus 3 Centro Fermi Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi Compendio del Viminale, Piazza del Viminiale 1, I 00184, Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Roma Tor Vergata Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I 00133 Rome, Italy 5 INFN, Sezione di Tor Vergata Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I 00133 Rome, Italy NIC, DESY, Platanenallee 6, D 15738 Zeuthen, Germany 7 Institut fur Physik, Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany 8 Theory Group, Lab. de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, 38026 Grenoble, France HISKP (Theory) Bonn University, Nussallee 14 16, Bonn, Germany 10 Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, CH 3012 Bern, Switzerland (Dated: January 26, 2016)
author_names: Abdou M Abdel-Rehim

Constantia Alexandrou

Martha Constantinou

Petros Dimopoulos

R Frezzotti

K Hadjiyiannakou

Karl Jansen

Christos Kallidonis

Bartosz Kostrzewa

Giannis Koutsou

Mariane Mangin-Brinet

M Sc Stefan Oehm

G C Rossi

Carsten Urbach

Urs Wenger
title: Erratum: Nucleon and pion structure with lattice QCD simulations at physical value of the pion mass [Phys. Rev. D 92 114513 (2015)
year: 2016

abstract: In the published version of our paper, some of the entries in Table II are erroneous. The errors originate in a mislabeling of the D classical coupling values therein: they are too high by a factor of 2. Consequently, the assignment of the D values to the sound speed values entered in columns 3, 4, and 5 are changed. The sound speed values themselves as measured in a D units by the molecular dynamics simulations or calculated from the equation of state or from the quasilocalized charge approximation remain unchanged. On the other hand, the sound speeds converted into thermal units in columns 6, 7, and 8 are reduced by a factor of 2 via the formula a D= 2 D m. To set the record straight, the amended table below which displays slightly more accurate up to date entries in columns 2, 3, and 4 replaces the original Table II. Furthermore, in the first paragraph of Sec. V, D=100 on line 14 should read D =50 and D=20 on line 15 should read D=10. Three lines below Eq. 44 D=60 should read D=30. The other changes this rescaling of D entails relate to comparisons with the EHB liquid. The comparisons now to be made are between the entries in column 5 of Table IV of the paper and the column 3 entries in the amended Table II below. As a result, the comparisons of the QLCA sound speeds on lines 11 and 12 of the second paragraph of Sec. V show smaller differences between EHB and point dipole sound speeds: 7.6% at D=20 is replaced by 5.6% at D=10; 6.2% at D=100 is replaced by 5.5% at D=50.
author_names: Kenneth I Golden

Gabor J Kalman

Zoltan Donko

Peter Hartmann
title: Erratum: Acoustic dispersion in a two dimensional dipole system [Phys. Rev. B 78, 045304 (2008)
year: 2008

abstract: We suggest a multiatom cavity quantum electrodynamics system for the weak magnetic field detection based on Faraday rot tion with intracavity electromagnetically induced transparen cy. The collective coupling between the cavity modes and the atomic ensemble ca n be used to improve the sensitivity. With single probe photon input, the sensitivity is inversely proportional to the number of atoms, and the sen sitivity with 2.3(1) nT/ Hz could be attained. With multiphoton measurement, the sensitivity can be approved to 4.7(9) fT/ Hz. (c) 2016 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (270.5570) Quantum detectors; (230.2240) Faraday effect. References and links 1. D. Budker and M. Romalis, "Optical magnetometry, Nature P hys.3, 227 234 (2007) 2. A. Edelstein, "Advances in magnetometry," J. Phys. Cond ens. Matter19, 165217 (2007) 3. J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Bud ker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, "High sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nan oscale resolution," Nat. Phys. 4, 810 816 (2008) 4. M. V. Romalis and H. B. Dang, "Atomic magnetometers for mat eri ls characterization," Mater. Today 14, 258 (2011) 5. S. Forstner, S. Prams, J. Knittel, E. D. van Ooijen, J. D. Sw aim, G. I. Harris, A. Szorkovszky, W. P. Bowen, and H. Rubinsztein Dunlop, "Cavity Optomechanical Magnetome ter," Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 120801 (2012) 6. K. Jensen, N. Leefer, A. Jarmola, Y. Dumeige, V. M. Acosta, P. Kehayias, B. Patton, and D. Budker, "Cavityenhanced Room Temperature Magnetometry Using Absorption by Nitrogen Cacancy Centers in Diamond," Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 160802 (2014) 7. Keyu Xia, Nan Zhao, and J. Twamley, "Detection of a weak mag netic field via cavity enhanced Faraday rotation," Phys. Rev. A92, 043409 (2015) 8. W. Muessel. H. Strobel, D. Linnemann, D. B. Hume, and M. K. O berthaler, "Scalable Spin Squeezing for Quantum Enhanced Magnetometry with Bose Einstein Conden sat s," Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103004 (2014) 9. D. D. McGregor, "High sensitivity helium resonance magn etometers," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 1067 1076 (1987) 10. T. Wu, X. Peng, Z. Lin, and H. Guo, "A dead zone free 4He atomic magnetometer with intensity modulated linearly polarized light and a liquid crystal polarization rotator," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 103105 (2015) 11. M. O. Scully and M. Fleischhauer, "High Sensitivity Mag netometer Based on Index Enhanced Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1360 1363 (1992) 12. M. Fleischhauer, A. B. Motsko, and M. O. Scully, "Quantum li it of optical magnetometry in the presence of ac Stark shifts," Phys. Rev. A62, 013808 (2000) 13. D. Petrosyan and Y. P. Malakyan, "Magneto optical rotat i n and cross phase modulation via coherently driven four lvel atoms in a tripod configuration," Phys. Rev. A 70, 023822 (2004) 14. J. P. Marangos, "Electromagnetically induced transpar ency," J. Mod. Opt.45, 471 503 (1998) 15. E. Paspalakis and P. L. Knight, "Electromagnetically in duced transparency and controlled group velocity in a multilevel system," Phys. Rev. A66, 015802 (2002) 16. D. Budker, W. Gawlik, D. F. Kimball, S. M. Rochester, V. V. Yashchuk, and A. Weis, "Resonant nonlinear magneto optical effects in atoms," Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1153 2101 (2002) 17. M. Atature, J. Dreiser, A. Badolato, and A. Imamoglu, "Ob servation of Faraday rotation from a single confined spin," Nat. Phys. 3, 101 106 (2007) 18. S. W. Chen and R. B. Liu, "Faraday rotation echo spectrosc opy and detection of quantum fluctuations," Sci. Rep. 4, 4695 (2014) 19. L. F. Yin, B. Luo, A. H. Dang, and H. Guo, "An atomic optical filter working at 1.5mm based on internal frequency stabilized laser pumping," Opt. Express 22, 7416 7421 (2014) 20. H. Tanji Suzuki, Wenlan Chen, R. Landig, J. Simon, and V. Vuletic, "Vacuum induced transparency," Science 333, 1266 (2011) 21. M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, M. O. Scully, and V. L. Velic hansky, "Intracavity electromagnetically induced transparency," Opt. Lett. 23, 295 297 (1998) 22. H. B. Wu, J. Gea Banacloche, and M. Xiao, "Observation of Intracavity Electromagnetically Induced Transparency and Polarization Resonances in a Dopper Broadened Medium," Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 173602 (2008) 23. M. Albert, A. Dantan, and M. Drewsen, "Cavity electromag netically induced transparency and all optical switching using ion Coulomb crystals," Nature Photon. 5, 633 636 (2011) 24. Bichen Zou and Yifu Zhu, "Light controlling light in a cou pled atom cavity system, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053802, (2013) 25. D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics(Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994) 26. M. Zwierz, C. A. Perez Delgado, and P. Kok, "General Opt imality of the Heisenberg Limit for Quantum Metrology," Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 180402 (2010) 27. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, "Statistical Distance a nd the Geometry of Quantum States," Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 3443 (1994)
author_names: Qiaolin Zhang

Hui Sun

Shuangli Fan

Hong-ju Guo
title: Fe b 20 16 High sensitivity Faraday magnetometry with intracavity electromagnetically induced transparency
year: 2017