The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette. — 1871-05-23 (Dorchester, Dorset, England)

SIT 11. Sehrin-lbbetson, that already drinking houses, ...Nod by public 'no who had been refused their licences, ~,re being estiblishod under the title of "Working Men's aod predicted that the adoption of such • tricalUre as this •ould largely increase that evil. Mr. llsten frankly admitted the disappointment and mond&anon which the withdrawal of the Licensing Bill had °eel.' • to himself. The measure before ',he house he chase.„ este which, by rainng false and illusory hopes g lance numbers of the people, really obstructed rather than liromotni the Proillees of legalatiou for the restriction of the liquor traffic ; aud, not despairing of such legislation, lie ilecidenly refused to support the second reading. rir W. lisirgis warmly remaliated those imputations ; and tolls' audibly expriused delight of his friends in the Speaker's sal Stringers' Gallery, announced his intention to persevere with this agitati..n until he carried his point.. The House divided, and the Bill was rejected by • majority e 172-11.0 to 124-• result which was cheered by both the valued and the losing side. DUIRJUILI was Meted With Cheer/ when he iroa to mdreas the Howe upon the motion to go into OMWilke upon the Customs and Income Tax Bill. He went Into a history .1 the financial proposals of the Government, a. c-' pinned that the House had not • fair opportunity of „,,,enigring whether it should not Mee the tea duties instead of inereming the income tel ; and be concluded bla speech, shieh lasted about an h ur and • quarter, with • panegyric ins. the irtues and atrugg'es of the lower middle clam whom, 'cording to the admission. ef the Chancellor of the Exchequer ail the Prime Minister themselves, that impost so severely he". Mr. Lowywhe was pretty well cheered when he rose to address the House, complaintsi that be had been male the subject of spratkal jiike, but admitted that he was pleased that at ter the tory and minatory termed his notice Mr.Dleracli bad "confined himself to • few technicalities." He explained the reasons Inch host li.duciod the Government to change their Budget schemes. The Howse did not receive their proposals with !atom, and so they substituted othere • instead of, like petulant children, throwing up their er'elixonsidered and matted scheme of army reform. Allot a few words from Hr FAWCITT and Mr NRWDROArg, Dr. B. ORDOR3II described the debate as a post-mortem exam, pillion of a iiefunct Budget which had committed suicide, and ben buried at cross-roadasnd drew rapturous cheers from the opposition by declaring that the Ministers,ll not, petulant children. were spoilt children, spoilt bythe obseiul ma majority • hich at at theaback, and was ready to be dragged through any mire that the Government chose. The real reason for the find alteration f the Budget was. he maintained, the demonstration id the matchmakers, and characterising the speech of the Cliancellor of the Exchequer as • lame mology, which was calculated to hens the Goverment into contempt, he cloeed with the remark that that right hon, gentleman, so far from Is g a petulant child, had arrived at years of discretion, • loch taught him "rather to preserve his place with our limiget, than go into exile, carrying his own schemes with After some hell-dozen little speeches, the Speaker was allowed to leave the chair. In Committee some time was spent In diesuseing•-occesion. ally with • good deal of warmth-a proposal by Mr. Hermon to collect the income tax half•yearly instead of yearly ; but in the end the clause intendel to carry out this q... 14,1, •as rejected by a Naaj,.rity of 32-70 to 37, mid the Bill was rejort.d unaltered. Then the House took up the consideration of the Army Itegillalion Bill, and Colonel Mao* moved the 0111il•-•kal from the ....cowl clans., of the words "prohibiting the papuent of pigmy for exchanges." The amendment, which was opposed by Ile CARDWILL, as being contrary to the whole principle of the Bill, led to a g of diecuesion. The amendment was negatived by a majority of 37-183 to  144. iIIIDAT.—The debate upon the second reading of the Wrattnrath Bill WY MlllllOll by Mr. Jous Maxim. Tilt SOLICITOR if!. chicly in defence of the measure. Al "no Irishman, hcaring every mark and token of being an Irithinan," he especially ridiculed the claim of Mr. It rtin, or any one elm, speak of Ireland with especial emphasis "My country." With an obvious but unexpressied reference to the celebrated story •.f the eine, he remarked that Mr. Ihrthes suggration that the peace of Westmeath might Ira preserved by arming the inhabitants, would have come tort apdropriately from the tnember for Kilkenny and while pointing out that time mud enlace before the remedial measures of the last. two Sessions could bear their full harvest of benefits, maintained that the Bacon ve were b iund to take care that there should be some people left In Ireland for them to benefit. Amid perpetual interruptions Mr. Whalley denounced, loon'coo,the teachings of the Roman Catholic priesthood in Ireland. The Howe divided, and the OT,onor D pranceal to omit from the measure the provisions continuing the Peace Preeervation Act was negatived by a ma) wity of