The Sun. — 1850-11-02 (London, England)

LORD MAYOR.- alone are spoken of as men having some interest in Aide Call°, fore• la eying been appointed by the Lord maintaining the authority of the Czar at Bucharest, 336 Northern of France !•07 .: •••••• • • •• INg 231,440586 143 Orleans to BourgesC t..)..... .. :•• :. 3,00 3,283 tero, $OO- f.,, rnian „, the swearing -in of the new Lord Mayor, Mr. "Ns Musgrave, accompanied by the Sheriffs and his and even in their regard we cannot but imagine that 7822 Orleans to Bordeaux •• • • •• •• Ig lei the i 13$1 0 ,„, Niue' assetabled Ihr011n!, Where th,. at his, Lo.rdship's residence, in Eaton-Paris and Orleans .... • • ... :.•.1 SO 'Air the fancied advantege is purely and 85 Paris and •Rouen ................. • 6,545 6,543 2,606 2,556 •__,. i... .1- ....t.rntinn to ite 21•4. •-,,,,,8,•-•,:.,..-5,,,. supposititious,C 4.1,,,, 59k Rouen and Havre .. •••••••• • • • • •• ..  Foremost both in position and importance among the contributions to the New Monthly for November, is an official paper describing the intrigues of a RussoAustrian alliance in the Danubian Principalities. From this remarkable and most perspicuous contribution, entitled " Foreign Influence on the Banks of the Danube," the reader may obtain an instant and vivid appreciation of the difficulties of late years clue. tering more and more thickly over the city of Bucharest, and generally speaking also over the whole of the provinces of Wallachia and Moldavia. Previously to explaining the real position of affairs in 'those unfortunate principalities, the writer—evidently master of his subject—dissipates all the false impressions abroad as to the nature of the disturbances recently taking place in Bulgaria. All those disturbances he attributes to the despicable intrigues of the Viennese and the St. Petersburgh Governments, intrigues tending perpetually, if possible, to embroil the Christian peasantry with their rulers, the Mussulmen ; and most justly attributes this ferocious policy in the instance of the Kaiser to a spiteful thirst for vengeance on the Sultan Caliph, for the hospitalities shown by him last year to the fugitive Hungarians, and in the instance of the Czar to the lust of realising that ambition so long cherished by the imperial lords of the Muscovites. Rather should we have said in reference to Russia, that the author of this masterly paper on the Danubian Provinces laughs to scorn the notion of the Czar ever extending his rule to the waters of the Golden Horn, insisting that Nicholas is too sagacious to dream of ever occupying with his legions the palaces and harems of Constantinople, and that consequently all his military efforts and diplomatic intrigues against the Ottoman Porte arise solely out of his anxiety to preserve the confines of his dominions as much 28 possible from the contaminating touch of liberal institutions, or from the yet more subtle infection of liberal ideas and principles. As well, thinks the writer in the New Monthly, might the Brother of the Moon dream of eating with his chop-sticks in the Elysee or in Buckingham Palace, as the Czar indulge in visions of sailing as a conqueror through the channel of the Dardanelles. He recognises too much vigour in the councils of the Sultan, too much vitality in the Turkish Government, too much enterprise arid enlightenment in the views of the Osmanli statesmen to imagine for an instant the practicability of the Cossacks ever affixing the banner of the double eagle to the minarets of Byzantium. In the generous, but still impartial estimate, thus formed of the Administration at Constantinople, we cordially and entirely coincide, as those might readily conjecture who have watched our arguments for some years past, in the leading columns of this journal, in regard to the infamous and unjustifiable occupation of Wallachia and Moldavia by the barbarian soldiers of the Autocrat. Against this occupation the intelligent correspondent of the New Monthly inveighs with just and earnest indignation, depicting it as diametrically opposed in its character to the stipulations of the treaty of Adrianople, a treaty which, as far back as 1460, proclaimed the Sultan the sovereign lord paramount of those principalities, and constituting the Autocrat as the potentate, simply guaranteeing the carrying out of the views of that famous compact. We are rejoiced to observe the tempered but emphatic words of commendation passed by the writer on Prince Stirbeg, in 'whose talents we would fain recognise some assurance of the ultimate redemption of the provinces from .Russian domination. The boyards alone are spoken of as men having some interest in maintaining the authority of the Czar at Bucharest, and even in their regard we cannot but imagine that the fancied advantage is purely supposititious, and that in the restoration to its due predominance of the influence of Turkey, the boyards, as well as the prince and the peasantry, would ultimately recognise the best assurances of happiness. Respecting the socalled Bulgarian insurrection, it is said that mediately Austrian and Russian intriguers were to blame, and that immediately the culprits were Marouf Aga and Sherif Effendi. While passing judgment thus adversely upon those officers, a tribute of respect and admiration is offered, on the other hand, to Yasuf Bey and to Ahmed Vefyk Effendi. We are gratified to observe, from the heading of this itnportant political statement in the New Monthly, that the subject will be resumed. The argument is already too lucid and valuable not to render the reader solicitous t o witness its continuation. Among the lighter contributions to the magazine are many deserving this month of especial praise, imparting, as they cannot fail to do in perusal, some sort of animation to the suicidal month of November. " London Locomotion, or the Cab Stand," is a capital essay upon that haunt of public conveyances, penned partly in the style of Pierce Egan, and partly in that of Charles Dickens. "My Cambridge Coach," to the uninitiated might sound as upon a kindred subject, though there are thousands who will not need to be told that the coach is not a vehicular contrivance but a man, in this instance one Mr. Staunton. A lively, gossipping, and most amusing paper, on " Fres ch Almanacks" will be found replete withth,lie 2\ many readible anecdofiogtruersm:se merry once one friend jnd i‘r. ofem otrheeimii; j, anent a Mr. Green, but not u Jolly yeGreen,il, i own 1.1/71 subsequently a contributor. This time his lucubration is descriptive of a burglary perpetrated in his own residence at St. John's Wood. One of the happiest sentences in the description is the postscript. Dudley Costello tells us bow Alfred Waebb4ll and Alexia Dentemps went  0010 0011' peB tifo e J I 0 4a 3 1,1"0( hey e WO 00 e Oll Were a o.f pole rOle. IST) tool, 60s; 1,i1) log t, oir goel #;eo Mr" 311.' • woe Dot by ca other r, AP' ,tivt• the s" tor _ _Nog' fe' pLI e 6thr lv #Ol, JEW, etobe ond art 11° at.  SD . Tlia W•-411INCI IN OF