The Sun. — 1869-02-08 (London, England)

LUXURIANT AND BEAUTIFUL HAIR.—MRS. S. A. ALLEN'S WORLD'S HAIR RESTORER OR DRESSING never fails to quickly restore Grey or Faded Hair to its youthful colour and beauty, and with the first application a beautiful gloss and de lightful fragrance is given to the Hair. It stops the Hair from Palling off. It prevents baldness. It promotes luxuriant growth; it causes the Hair to grow thick and strong. It removes all dandruff. It contains neither oil nor dye. In large Bottles— Price Six Shillings. Sold by most Chemists and Perfumers, Depot 266, ILIA 1191blau  without any substantial objection being made to it. There can be no reason why the claims of ten years back should not be settled as well as those of five r years back ; and by the terms of the Convention, 1 all evidence is adcuissable, therefore Great Britain's premature recognition of belligerent rights to the Confederacy may be impugned and argued before the umpire. Indeed the second paragraph of Art. 11 may have been introduced with especial reference to the discussion of this subject ; therefore one of the objections raised in the United States disappears, and the other could never stand in equity. Our object is not, however, to discuss this Convention, but to show the error so generally entertained in America that the best policy of the United States is to wait. Men are right to forecast the future as well as they can, but they are wrong to act on their predictions as if they were facts. In doing this they intrude into the place of PROVIDENCE, while the marvellous way in which the most clever are deceived oaght to be a oaution to the rest. It is taken for granted in America that England must soon be involved in a foreign or a domestic war. It is also taken for granted that the States are comparatively secure from the liability, and from this comes the conclusion that the Republic can make her own terms when England's time arrives, or repay Britain in her own coin with compound interest. Meanwhile the claims can be used iu retaliation to hamper and degrade this country. They are not wise people, according to our view, who give the nation this advice. The rejection of. the Convention might be taken by Europe to mean that the Union reserved the power of employing privateers to burn vessels on the high seas, or to equip and sell such vessels to belligerents which could be commissioned from other than the ports of the nation at war whose flag the cruisers flew. Would the establishment of such an international law be in harmony with the future the same men predict for the United States? whose shipping trade is about to take a rapid turd upwards. Its danger must be in proportion to that trade, for it evidently strikes a fatal blow at a genuine maritime power, placing an inland country like Austria or Russia on a better footing at sea than nations like France, Britain, or the United States. Suppose, for instance, that the Republic became involved in a war with Austria. While the Empire was safe from attack, the EMPEROR could send men with Commissions in their pockets to France and England tofitontA labanzas and cruise against the commerce of the States. What occurred during the rebellion would again take place, and tha knowledge that this would surely occur in case of such a war would strengthen materially the inland power at the expense of the maritime power. If England became involved in such a contest she would have to drink to the dregs the bitter cup of which the Americans so justly complain. The two nations most vulnerable on this point are the United Kingdom and the United States, and it would be little less than suicide for the one to establish the precedent and for the other to insis