The Sun. — 1851-04-17 (London, England)

SARGOOD-1 suppose your being sued by Mr. Billing upon that was the reason which made you so careful not to put your name to any of these bills. Insolvent—(knits right, sir. Mr. SARGOOD then proceeded to inquire respecting the case of Captain Campbell. The insolvent said he knew nothing of Mr. Henry Levi. He got nothing from Lewis Levi for Captain Campbell's bill. Mr. SARGOOD said that Mr. Henry Levi, of Arundel street, had written a letter demanding payment of Mr. Se well's acceptance, and threatening proceedings as the alternative. They had wished to examine Mr. Billing, but had been unable to catch him. Mr. Commissioner Lew observed that Mr. Beesely had written for payment of this bill on one day, and Mr. Billing wrote another demand for himself a few days after. Hance had told them that Lewis got that bill, and that wino and pictures were to be given for it, but nothing came of it, and Mr. Lewis swore he had not the least recollection of such a bill. A clerk to the attorney said he took out a sub acne for Mr. Billing on the Bth instant, but had not been able to serve it. An action had been brought upon the bill, and notice of trial given for the last Maidstone assizes, but in consequence of the absence of Lieutenant Hallows, a material witness, the trial was postponed until the next assizes. The insolvent said he knew nothing of Mr. Sewell —his transaction was with Lieutenant Hallows—and put in a letter signed by that officer : " September 17, 1850. " I hereby authorise you to negotiate and deal with the bill of exchange dated this day, drawn by myself on, and accepted by, Mr. John Sewell, of Wickhill-house, Berks, in such way as you may think fit; and your receipt for the produce shall be an acknowledgment in my behalf for the consideration for the same." In reply to the COMMISSIONER, The insolvent said he dictated the form of the letter for Lieutenant Hallows to write, and he took it from all he had dealings with. Lieutenant Hallows got no money for the bill, for the best reason, that he (insolvent) got no money for it himself. Mr. JAMES then called a clerk to the attorneys of Mr. Bowen to make out that gentleman's complaint. The witness said an action had been commenced against Mr. Bowen by Messrs. De Paul Dastis and Dastis, upon a bill of exchange for 2501, dated September 18th, 1850, endorsed by Lewis to them. Pleas had been put in, and there the matter remained at present. Mr. Commissioner LAW asked the insolvent if he had been aware of any bill dated as lately as the 18th of September, 1850 ? The insolvent replied that he received the bill in the morning of the 18th of September, and was arrested in the afternoon. He had never heard of Messrs. De Paul and Co. till the last witness called upon him a few days since. None of the parties had any further evidence to offer. Mr. Commissioner Law said be had his own irnpreesion upon this case. There had been a good deal of matter arising chiefly out of the inquiry of the Court into the imperfect state of the schedule. tollitt cametle nothing, Ile would not dispose of the case to-day, unless it t setreweaad:vio: very alrn wished by the insolvent. The way in which the Court to know something of the case, instead matteri n was that the spine theeia l schedulehal balancesheet, te sheet, and the insolvent had got into his hands very shortly before his arrest, and some, as they had just  FA AsTuITNE,TRERGy .Az TA hz ze s car ofDESCRIPTIONe OF THE VICTIMS IN Juggernaut rolled over willing suicides, and crushed the hones wof its victims during their ecstacv of fanaticism. Here, n enthusiasm has perished, the crusl!irer, when the sustaining tinned through days and nights of crushing process dismal is still condespondency, till death claims the bride of despair.