The North-Eastern Weekly Gazette. — 1883-11-03 (Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, England)

CICAL OUTLOOK. rs of the public news o ground of complaint ith the admirable and iddress of Sir Charles ae Scotch Liberals on 3 three speeches of Lord ?.ding. A conference of of the Scotch Liberal ilar to the English Conheld at Leeds, met at sday to the number of lepted a series of resoln' I the introduction of the eat session, a redistribuabolition of the minority ugh reform of the land Scotland, and urging ent of a Minister it for the management . It becomes more patent L is the desire of the vast the people that the 3nt should no longer delay which its majority were mplish. It is true that aen of position and power ranks—Mr Courtney, for prefer that the Govern-1 with other measures on !amme, leaving the ertenhise for its final effort. d party as a whole is imous in calling upon the o introduce as the wore of the next se.the assimilation of the arough franchise. The the Scotch Liberals I ion, corroborating and he expression of Liberal Lnd, attests the accuracy id we may depend upon it tone and his colleagues resolutions of these two es the weighty considersrepresentative character legitimately claim. Lord already warned us that re party will not assent tiola of the borough and ise without at the same fore them the Ministerial le redistribution of elee-. The Conservative loader I adherents believe that it rty strategy, meant to gain itage, which prompts the de these two great quesational reform. Is it not of party strategy which they should be taken torish we could honestly beSalisbury was sincere in feet a real reform of Parmesentation, but neither y have brought the quesnsion of the franchise and sentation within the range Aitics. The popular deredistribution of electoral ousehold suffrage in the Ben created and sustained  party, and that reform assimilation of the borough ichise as a matter of course. 7 charges the Liberals to divide these two great order to further party not that the reason for ires the extension of the redistribution, of seats to her? Is it not a party :en in the hope of frustratibject which the Liberals It is not an equitable disdectoral power that Lord iires to obtain, but he e introduction of that with the assimilation of id county franchise in the ng both. Much as he and e scouted public opinion, 7 is beginning to recognise ower of the people. The , he admits, is being transarliament to the constita. i was the caseat Inkerman, old ie rs' fight. However ,bservation may have been, y could not have paid a tribute to the growth and Lvanced Liberalism in this admits that the people are act to be governed accord. will of "sovereigns and at are determined that the some free in reality as well %aid that the administration hall be in strict accordance bee of the people. It is rd Salisbury resents the I Mr Bright that the liords ought to act in o the will of the le scornfully declines to y refusing all reforms meant spresentative assembly the Is will imperil itsown existUpper House," he tells us, Polished or reformed without ut," and that consent, he  never be given, for " alar of death will induce a Jay things, it never yet has man to commit suicide." isbury is not the House of