Glasgow Courier. — 1858-02-25 (Glasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland)

THE NEW MINISTRY.  (PER ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH.) The Times 111 enabled to publish the authentic list of the new Cabinet submitted by Lord berby to the Queen yesterday. Premier, Derby; Exchequer, D'lsraeli ; Chancellor, Thesiger; President of the Council, Salisbury; Privy Seal, Hardwieke; Home, Walpole; Foreign, Malmesbury ; Colonial, Bulwer Lytton; War, General Peel; Admiralty, Pakington ; Postmaster, Lord Colchester ; Trade, Henley; Control, Ellenborough ; Works, John Manners; Attorney-General, Kelly; Under ' Secretary for War, Major Stewart Wortley. Ireland, Eglinton ; Chancellor, Blackburn; Chief Secretary, Naas. The Duke of Newcastle, Lord Grey, and Mr Gladstone, to whom overtures were made by Lord Derby, have declined to join his Cabinet. No offer was made to Mr Sidney Herbert. The high office of Governor General of India is said to be reserved for Lord Stanley, in the event of Lord Canning declining to serve the new government, and that the great offices of the household will be given to the Marquis of Exeter, Earl Delaware, and the Earl of Chesterfield. The Herald says that Lord Dalkeith, Colonel Taylor, and Mr Whitmore, are to be Lords of the Treasury; G. Hamilton, Financial Secretary; and Joliffe, Patronage Secretary of the Treasury; Harvey, Home Under Secretary; Cairns, Irish Solieitor General. The Advertiser says that Lord St. Leonard' is to have a seat in the Cabinet without office. If the Ministry contrive to get through the session, they are, of course, in for a year; and should their official existence be so prolonged, they have determined on bringing in a Reform Bill in the beginning of the session of 1859; but if Lord John Russell gives notice of a Reform Bill this session, they will probably be out,before two months are over. ftne Times says we have now before us the penitential sheet, in which England submits to envelop itself, by way of expiating the offence of receiving an insolent despatch. It loss ghastly, and then as colourless, as it is devoid of substance, and destitute of outline as a robe of penance ought to bM The occasion being one of duty, it almost precludes criticism. In fact, all the remarks It is possible to make on the programme before us is, that one or two of the arrangements are respectable. The great question is, what will Lord Derby do with the Reform Bill  The Times states that owing to the confusion which prevailed at the time of the division on Friday last, it was erroneously supposed that the House of Commons had negatived the second reading of the Conspiracy to Murder Bill ; the fact is, however, that the question of the second reading of the bill was never put to the house, Mr Gibson's amendment having for the time superseded it. It is competent with the House to proceed with the bill, if it thinks fit to do so, notwithstanding what has taken place. It thinks it doubtful whether the amendment of Mr Gibson was consistent with parliamentary law, as it certainly was an infringement on its spirit. For instance, when the new Chancellor moves that the House resolve itself into committee of supply, it will not he desirable to propose, as an amendment on the Budget, that the country demands a Reform Bill. The coalition of last Friday is already dissolved, and the powerful opposition which is about to succeed to its functions will do well to abstain from following its example. The Daily News believes the late government, in resigning, had an idea that Lord Derby could not form a Cabinet.  The Evening Herald, in a second edition, says that Mr Edward Egeiton, is to be Judge Advocate, Mr Seymour Under Secretory at the Foreign Office. The Earl Carnarvon is to be in the governmeat. The Duchess of Manchester is to be Mistress of the Robes. Sir F. Thesiger will take his seat in the Lords as Lord Woodstock.