The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — 1843-04-28 (Liverpool, Merseyside, England)

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE.  UNITED STATES.  We have received New York papers to the 7th instant inclusive, by the packet-ship Independence, Captain Nye, which arrived at this port on Wednesday forenoon. The papers contain two sets of correspondence between Mr. Webster and Mr. Fox, both relating to the disputed territory on the north-eastern boundary. The first set had reference to a resolution of the legislature of the State of Maine, relative to certain proceedings of the Government of New Brunswick, supposed to be in contravention of the terms of the treaty of the 9th of August, between the United States and Great Britain, by attempting to collect from American citizens bonds or securities for lumber eut, belonging to the disputed territory, that was to be surrendered by Great Britain to the states of Maine and Massachusetts under the treaty. Mr. Fox had so long ago as October last, on receiving intelligence from Lord Ashburton of the signature of the treaty of Washington, issued orders to the Attorney-General of the province to suspend all proceedings upon the bonds in question; the Attorney-General had duly obeyed the order. "It appears, therefore, says Mr. Fox, " that the resolutions of the Maine Legislature cannot have been grounded upon an accurate statement of facts." The second set of correspondence had reference to the seizure, by the British authorities, of an American citizen, named Columbia. them ae3frl oft Sirrce.aui slb; ,gyreseb,:oaotfernwrr leceihttotewet territory i ettgion)aercvyl gave on territoryoos ten' dtthhaee U on fi tNedewStautersu,naawndiebky, satraritevmaleonft tohfe the b cbd.,:tueondfdSbatylvmapgteera.snoyn2lBl rns.de Firsvoci xrnegst indiscretion dsoethat, irregularity ' a' ui t t hiot r ishallthyaso of the British provincial Government, he has no doubt that the matter will have been already set to rights by the Lieutenant-Governor." The papers also contain a letter from Mr. Webster to Mr. Everett, the American minister at London, and dated March 28, on the subject of the right of visitation. It is a vindication of the passage in the President's message at the opening of Congress relative to the right of search, which it will be remembered, gave rise to discussion in the British Parliament. Neither the stock nor the money market had presented any features of interest. Prices of State securities were improving. Bills on London were in limited demand for the Independence. The rate was 1031 to 106 per cent. premium. Oa Paris the rate was 51: 421 c. to sf. 414 c. broughtof m forwardin dan and intellect a variety f of ) The papers contain the report of the trial of a man named White for the murder of his father in Genesee county, Western New York. In the defence the counsel for White set up the plea of I an side all such defence. The jury found the prisoner guilty, d g sentenced him ftahcetsc,rismhoinwal ; but the judge seta` showing the Jude singular eccentricity d a to be hanged. The sheriff's jury in New York had, In a case of sedueassessed the damages at 10,000 dollars, or £2OOO sterling. go by default, tion, in which judgment had been allowed to  The city of Brussels has been greatly excited for murdersome his freetttue rr n 7:: days, by the trial of M. Cournartin, for the alleged of M. Sirey, in the apartments. of Nladelle. Heinefetter, an actress of some celebrity both in France and Belgium. 'M Caumartin, who resides in France, was a lover of Madelle. Heinefetter, and had accompanied her from Paris to BNB' sels, where he left her for some time. During his absence he received a number of passionate letters M. Siren, fromalso athFerleandeb. whom he expected to find devoatetd .tioadheilmie.onliehi Hoping .tp give her a surprise, he returned unexpectedly. and was self much more surprised than delighted to find that gjohteasenorthi%e.arlilomveert, apartments, after the theatre,. and there had a.quarrel, which ended in the death of M. Sirey, from a stab in the body inflicted with a sword cane. On the trial, M. Caumartin stated that the deceased not only began the quar.rel, but that he attacked him with a knife and wounded him in the thigh, and that he was killed in rushing forward to repeat the blow: The jury, after hearing the evidence, unanimously acquitted the prisoner. _____.....„,...