The Sun. — 1864-06-27 (London, England)

DROUYN DE LHUYS. IKEDA TDIKOUGO NO KAMI. KAIYATSOU IDZOU NO KAMI. KAWADA SAGAMI NO KAMI.  In addition to the above arrangement the Japanese ambassadors, charged by the Tycoon to offer to the government of the Emperor reparation for the attack of which a French officer (Lieutenant Camus) was victim in Japan, have engaged to pay as an indemrdly a sum of 35,000 dollars, or 192,500 f., to bo handed to the family of that officer. This payment was immediately cff,eted. Tne envoys of the Tycoon at the same time declared that their Government would take all necessary measures fear detecting ar.cl punishing the murderers of Lieut. Camus,  The Independance nage says that the Japanese ambassadors were to have visited England, Holland, and Switzerland, but that, owing to political modifications in their government, they hastily concluded their negotiations with France, in order to return home at once. It is said, however, that another embassy is to be sent to Europe at the commence. ment of next year. Courtesy of the Orleans Family.  A statement appeared some days back in the London TVeekly Register (a Roman Catholic paper) to the effect that Bishop Grant, who was the celebrant at the marriage of the Count de Paris, had been treated by the family with great discourtesy. That statement, which was copied into the Jlionde of Paris, and commented upon in the same spirit, produced a certain sensation both among L?gitinaists and Orleaniste. Finding that the article of the London paper was reproduced in a French journal, which did not express 51 ny doubt of its accuracy, General Count Dumas has addressed the following letter to the Monde :  Sir,—lf the Abbe Guelle, Chaplain to the Queen Marie Adelaide, were not detained in attendance on the Duke de Montpensier, who has been dangerously ill, he would have given a contradiction to the misstatements in the 1.17 eekly Register, which you copied into your paper of yesterday, In his absence I feel bound to do so, as I am the person who was charged by her Majesty with the arrangements for tho marriage of the Count de Paris. You say that the Catholic Bishop of Southwark, who performed the marriage ceremony, had reason to complain of the treatment he received. I deny this in the most distinct manner, and, to corroborate my Quasi, I refer you to Monseigneur Grant himself. He well tell you with what respect and affection he has been treated on every occasi,)n by the Queen, and by every member of the family. As for the facts on which you found that strange assertion, there is not a single one which is not absolutely contrary to the truth. In the hospitality offered to the guests at Claremont there was no distinction to make between Catholic children and Protestant, for the simple r.-ason that the Royal Family had not invited children, to add,' as you express it, " to the splendour of the ceremony," and consequently, some could not have been cared for and others neglected, The Protestant Dean of St. Paul's had not to say grace at the table of the Ro3 al guests, as he was not present, not having been included in the number of English personages invited.  If Monseigneur Grant did not take part in the repast which followed the nuptial benediction, the reason is, that he preferred, as he did last year, on the occasion of the marriage of the Duke de Chartres, and in conformity to ecclesiastical usage, not coming to Claremont for a marriage feast. But Monseigneur Grant, as well se all the priests who assisted him, was received by the Abbe Guelle in the name of th- Queen, and a collation was specially prepared for him, at his own convenience, and in the place and at the hour which he himself had fixed upon. And as for what you say, sir, with respect to the antiCatholic tendencies of the House of Orleans, I again refer you to the venerable Bishop of Southwark. He, lam convinced, will tell you that there is not a Catholic family in hie diocese who performs all the duties of our religion with more exactness and piety than all the members of the Orleans family.  I rely on your impartiality, Sir, for the insertion of the present letter in your next number; and I pray you :o receive the assurance of niy distinguished consideration.  General Count C. D 1-31 AS.  PREPAIIATIONS FOIL WAlL—Orders have been received at the Stores at Pimlico, anl the Arsenal at Woolwich, to prepare, and hold in readiness for immediate use, the neceesary articles of clothing and warlike equipment for a force of 30,000 men.-- Visited Service Ga:cttc.