The Sun. — 1864-06-27 (London, England)

DROUYN DE LHUYS. DIKOUGO NO KAMI. KAWATSOU IDZOU NO KAMI. KAWADA SAGAMI NO KAMI.  In addition to the above arrangement the Japanese ambaoslidors, charged by the Tycoon to offer to the government of the Emperor reparation for the attack of which a French officer (Lietuenant Camtp,) was victim in Japan, have eng,tge'd to ply as an indemi:ila sum of 35,000 doilats, or 192,500 f., to be Landed to the family of that. officer. This payment was immediately eff,cted. Tue envoys ut he Tycoon at the same time declared that their Government would take all necessary measures fur uetecting tad punishing the murderers of Lieut. Camus,  The Independance Beige says that the .Lpancsc, ambassadors were to have visited England, Holland, and Switz,...rland, but that, owing to political modi fications in their government, they hastily concluded their negotiations with France, in order to return home at once. It is said, however, that another embassy is to be sent to Europe at the commence. ment of next year. Courtesy of the Orleans Family.  A statement appeared some days back in the .London Weekly Register (a Roman Catholic paper) to the effect that Bishop Grant, who was the celebrant at the marriage of the Count de Paris, had been treated by the family with great discourtesy. That statement, which was copied into the Monde of Paris, and commented upon iu the same spirit, produced a certain sensation both among Legitimists and Orleaniste. Finding that th© article of the London paper was reproduced in a French journal, which did not express 6ny doubt of its accuracy, General Count Dumas has addressed the following letter to the Monde :  Sir,--If the Abbe Gaelle, Chaplain to the Queen Marie Adelaide, were not detained in attendance on the Duke de Montpensier, who has been dangerously ill, he would have given a contradiction to the misstatements in the IP eekly _Register, which you copied into your paper of yesterday, In his absence I feel bound to do so, as I am the person who was charged by her Majesty with the arrangements for tho marriage of the Count de Paris. You say that the Catholic Bishop of Southwark, who performed the marriage ceremony, had reason to complain of the treatment he received. I deny this in the most distinct manner, and, 0 corroborate my denial, I refer you to Monseigneur Grant himself. He will tell you with what respect and affection be has been treated on every occasion by the Queen, and by every member of the family. As for the facts on which you found that strange assertion, there is not a single one -which is not absolutely contrary to the truth. In the hospitality offered to the guests at Claremont there was no distinction to make between Catholic children and Protestant, for the simple reason that the Royal Family had not invited children, to add,' as you express it, " to the splendour of the ceremony," and consequently, some could not have been cared for and others neglected, The Protestant Dean of St. Paul's had not to say grace at the table of the Royal guests, as he was not present, not having been included in the number of English personages invited.  It Monseieneur Grant did not take part in the repast which followed the nuptial benediction, the reason is, that he preferred, as he did last year, on the occasion of the marriage of the Duke de Chartres, and in conformity to ecclesiastical usage, not coming tot Jaren:mut fora marriage feast. But Monseigneur Grant, as well as all the priests who assisted him, was received by the Abbe Guelle in the name of dr_ Queen, and a collation was specially prepared for him, at his own convenience, and in the place and at the hour which he himself had fixed upon. And as for what you say, Sir, with respect to the anti. Catholic tendencies of the House of Orleans, I again refer you to the venerable Bishop of Southwark. He, lam convinced, will tell you that there is not a Catholic family in his diocese who performs all the duties of our religion with more exactness and piety than all the members of the Orleans family. I rely on your impartiality, Sir, for the insertion of the present letter in your next number; and I pray you to receive tho assurance of my distinguisbed consideration.  General Count C. D