Glasgow Courier. — 1844-03-02 (Glasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland)

DON C/111.111116 Lord J. MANNERS then route to move sit address, praying her Majesty lio intercede with the King 6(.16W !reecho* behalf of ?Carlos. The Noble Lord weeetifer.plvedesitertdcf. the war • Basque provinees, seesorbitti -the Wildele___ linglish vat force on the coast, during the sago 4of 'lli and partioulsrly every step connected with the formates sled employ ment of the English legion. He censured the Ewa.* Government of the time for having taken no museums for the personal security of Don Carlos, defended throughout the conduct of that prinoe, and maintained that neither during the civil war in Spain nor since his retirement into France had that illustrious prince done anything to justify the treatment he was now receiving. Sir R. PEEL, while he owned he could not but feel sympathy for the misfortunes of Don Carlos, expressed a hope that the House would net sanction the motion now before it. The Right Hon. Baronet quoted the authority of the French GoArnment to show that for the constraint of Don Carlos England was not responsible, that constraint having been imposed in the interests of France, and in virtue of the French law. The motion of the Noble Lord was avowedly founded on the principle that the constraint of Don Carlos wee inconsistent with the honour of England. For the House to establish such a principle might lead to the most dangerous consequences to the good feeling between England and France, and should her Majesty intercede with the Ring of the French in such terms, the French Government would probably treat the application with merited alight. Mr. SMYTHE still-expressed a belief that Don Carlos would not have been detained in France but in compliance with the ex- ' pressed wishes of England. Lord PALMERSTON admitted that the English Government had expressed an opinion to the French Government, that Don , Carlos ought not to be allowed to leave France without entering 1 into express engagements not to disturb the peace of Spain. Eneland had no interest in the success of any particular faction ! in Spain The interest of England was, that Spain should become powerful and prosperons, and have her proper weight in the European balance of power. Mr. A. B. COCHRANE particularly applied himself to show that all the troubles that had broken out in Spain of late years, had been fomented by French intrigue. Sir CHARLES NAPIER made • statement of some length respecting the conduct of Don Carlos, whom the Hon. and Gallant Member described as guilty of the foulest murders, and as utterly undeserving of the sympathy of Englishman. After soma further discussion, in which Mr. Borthwick, Sir H. Douglas' Mr. Trelawny, Mr. M. Milne', sod Ur. M. Gore participated, Lord J. MANNERS replied, intimating that he would not press the measure to a division. There were lond cries of 0 Divide," and It was for some time undecided whether a division would take place or not. The motion was, however, negatived without a division. Captain BERNAL moved for a copy of an address from the Protestant Operative Association of Dublin to the Lord-Lieutenant. Lord ELIOT opposed the motion, as oalculated to give too much importance to the matter. The motion, however, was pressed to a divisioo, and rejected be a majority of 105 against 54.  his m tsar= for the W 1141.1 stateguilect connected with Scotlead, tlw owoonnw w not usually attract much nonies. No Hon. Member rising to second the motion, The SPEAKER pronounced the oourse adopted Member to be altogether irregular, J. GRAHAM rose to speak point ion. Member, whose motion, not properly before the House. The House was much Right Hon. r in the • allowed