The Sun. — 1834-01-06 (London, England)

CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES.----SITTING OF JAN. 3. bad concluded, Rente de Naples, 91f. 90f. 95c. 9lf. 10c. -4 ar, eP - 2 68E t-, F s, Roman Five per Cents., 9114. 3 g. . The debate on the address was resumed. M. Chanuis de Montlaville rose and explained an ex- Renee d'Ecnagne_ Five ner Cents._ 1/41,4, V_  M. Garnier Pages rose to address the Chamber.— (Marks of curiosity.)—He began by acknowledging that the project of address proposed to them was not made up of those common places usually employed in these sort of declamations; nevertheless, with the exception of this innovation, the address appeared to him very insignificant ; it appeared to him framed merely with a view to render the elections favourable to the majority of the Chamber in the ensuing elections, but he felt confident that the system of the present Ministry would be stigmatized by the electoral body. The Hon. Deputy said he had witnessed with regret the attack made upon M. Persil yesterday. M. Persil could not have acted otherwise than be did. Being appointed by a Government of violence, he must necessarily act with violence.—(Laugh-, ter from the centre.) A state of frightful disorder is seen on every side.—(Oh, oh !) lam not a friend to popular tumults, nor coalitions of which violence is one of the means. I seize the opportunity of saying this, in order that the working classes may know my opinion upon that subject. Means such as these can lead to no good result. What the people want is their rights ; a real representation will make known their wants and %heir interests,—(Oh !)  M. Chapuis de Montlaville rose and explained an expression he bad made on the preceding day, which was misunderstood by the Chamber. In stating that the Society of the Rights of Man had adopted Robespierre as a complete symbol of their principles, he meant to say that they had, no doubt, made a distinction between the patriot and the sanguinary Member of the Convention. He declared that, far his part, be repudiated the principles of the deplorable epoch of 1793, and would never be a partisan of the political Oct who proclaimed them. The discussion of the address was then resumed, and M. Lamortier, as first orator, was called to the tribune. The name of this gentleman/was received with marks of approbation, and his appearance at the tribune excited much interest. The orator began by acknowledging that many useful reforms had been considered in the Administration, that improvements had been made in the instruction of the inferior classes, that peace had been consolidated, and he thanked the country for those results. After a political profession, in which he said that lee was the agent of no party, be professed his respect for our illustrious misfortunes, and deplored the excesses coramitted in their name in the western departments of France: he prayed his colleagues not to take any engagement, with regard to the question of the East ; thev were, he said, unacquainted with the intentions of the 'French Government and those of its intimate allies on that subject. They should wait until they understood the question better. He declared that a destructive war would be the result of any interference en the part of France with that of the Ottoman empire, and begged of his colleagues to suppress the paragraph of the address referring to the eastern question. M. Alexandre Giroud made a frightful picture of the violence, committed in La Vendee by the Chouans, and expressed a desire that energetic measures should be resorted to, to restore order to that province, and provide for the security of the patriots who were exposed unjustly to be disarmed and murdered by ferocious bands, sent forward by a secret tribunal, who issued sentences but too punctually executed.