The Sun. — 1835-11-28 (London, England)

CZAR. He would himself use the same language on the banks of the Seine, had he as much confidence in the guns of the Barricades as NICHOLAS has in the cannon of the ALEXANDER Citadel which. commands Warsaw. As yet we are without any intimation of the course which the British Cabinet proposes to adopt with respect to this speech. It is certainly the duty of our Government to take some steps respecting it ; unless the world is to understand that the days are for ever gone, when England prided herself upon the fulfilment of her treaties in favour of the oppressed. We have not yet recognised the right of Russia to conquer Poland. Parliament has repeatedly declared the principle of such a conquest a barbarous and inhuman aggression. Why then not seize this opportunity to apprise the CZAR that England and France are pledged to maintain the independence of Poland, and will maintain it ? The occasion is most opportune. Poland is again menaced, not only with slaughter but with annihilation. Wretched and imbrued as she is in her. own blood, we are still in a condition to burst her, prison bars, strike off her manacles, and to raise her to more than a pristine state of power, freedom, and independence. Had we interfered earlier, we would have prevented the effusion of seas of innocent blood —we would have spared the brave but unhappy Poles a weight of misery, which would have crushed the spirit of any people in Europe. Nevertheless, we can yet redeem our greatest error. We can still save Poland. This will remove every stain from the national honour of Great Britain. And though it will not repair the immense injury which our past, disregard of the cries and entreaties of Poland has occasioned, yet will it prevent the infliction of calamities still more disastrous, which threaten to overwhelm that country. It is scarcely worth notice to remark upon the trifling differences between the Frankfort and the Paris versions of the, Imperial speech ; although the German Editor points them out as strikingly important. He sums them up thus : " This speech was delivered by the Emperor on the 4th (16th) Oct., in the Lagiunski Palace. The version first published by the Journal des Debats, and which has given occasion to many comments and diatribes, differs from the preceding in three places chiefly The Emperor blaming the Poles for destroying their own happiness, added, by renouncing your own institutions and trampling them under foot.' The Debats omits this declaration. 2. At the passage where the Emperor says his only desire was to return the Poles good for evil, he added so I have sworn before God, and my oaths are sacred to me.' These words do not appear in the. version , of the Debats. 3. The passage which says Russia remains strong and untouched amidst the disorders which agitate Europe,' is given differently by the Debats, which makes the Emperor say exclusively only Russia remains strong and untouched.' " The first error with -which the Debats is here charged is one of omission. . This, we think, the Frankfort scribe is rather unlucky in noticing. By the omission in the Debats, the C7A R is saved the expression of what all the world knows to be an infamous falsehood. It was ,the CZAR himself and his mad brother, not the municipality of Warsaw, who trampled under foot the free institutions of Poland. The second correction is equally unhappy. It adds blasphemy to the charges of cruelty, and murderous oppression, preferred by the Press of France and England against the