Stockton Herald, South Durham and Cleveland Advertiser. — 1886-01-23 (Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, England)

SIR WILFRID LAWSON AND THE  'TEN COMMANDMENTS."  Sir Wilfrid Lawson has addressed the following characteristic letter to a contemporary. The humorous Baronet says :—ln your Friday's article on Home Rule you say—" We are all for Home Rule plus the Ten Commandments. But if the Irish seek Home Rule to violate the Ten Commandments with impunity, then tiley shall not have Home Rule, let them demand it ever so loudly." I have my doubts whether it is possible to violate the "Ten Commandments with impunity L• " but we will not atop to argue that point. But what I went to know is how far you intend to carry this "Ten Commandment" theory. Is it applicable to all nations, or only to the Irish? If the former, how shall we stand in England? The Ten Commandments forbid, among other things, murder, stealing, and lying, and coveting our neighbour's possessions. Do we reverence the command, "Thou shalt do no murder ?" Let thousands of Zulus, Afghans, Egyptians, and Arabs, whom we have slaughtered during the past few years, give dumb evidence on that point. The slaughter of these unfortunate men, whose crime is that they are worse armed than we are, is duly hailed with public acclamation, and with ecclesiastical thanksgiving. Stealing is equally popular. At this very moment the Press gushes with rapturous delight because Lord Duifferin has succeeded in stealing the territory of the Burmese. As to lying I need say nothing, as we are all fresh from the general election. The Irish will be very ingenious if they can contrive to violate the Ten Commandmanta more successfully than we do in very many of our public proceedings. The crimes for which we are responsible are, however, mainly committed against feeble , foreigners who have no means of stating their ease to the world. But the violation of the Eighth Commandment is what you really fear will be endorsed in Ireland, and be committed against the body of Irish landlords, who up to a recent period have had their own way in that country. The fear is that the tenants will steal the property of the landlords. In former times the landlords have stolen the property of the tenants. In either case stealing is most deplorable. But I don't know whether, in a moral point of view, the latter is worse than the former. Honest men must hope that both may be put a stop to. Sir, I hold by the Ten Commandments, and I heartily wish that all nations and all individuals would pay them practical deference. All that I maintain at present is that the fear that the Irish may on one point adopt a different course is not enough to justify us in refusing them the benefit of self-government. If we are to wait until we have guarantees for the observance of the Ten Commandments before we grant political rights to nations we shall have, I fear, to wait until doomsday, or at the very least until the millennium is upon us. However, the position taken up in your article may be the right °lie, but even in that case we shall speak to our Irish brethren with muoli more effect if we can show that we ourselves are observing the rules which we are so anxious to enforce upon them.