The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — 1843-02-21 (Liverpool, Merseyside, England)

WAS NOT WORDS WHICH WOULD MON'  PARLIAMENT, BUT FORCE ; THIS SHOULD HAN  EFFECT IF THEY DID NOT CHANGE THEIR SYSTEN HE HAD HEARD OF A GENTLEMAN WHO, IN A PR]  VATE COMPANY, SAID THAT :F A HUNDRED PEI  SONS CAST LOTS AMONGST THEM, AND THE LO FELL UPON HIM, HE WOULD TAKE TH LOT TO DEPRIVE SIR ROBERT PEEL 0 LIFE." ( ! !!)  Most Christian sentiments these, ladies and gentlemen of the League party ! a most patriotic and Christian character this Reverend Mr. Bayley ! If WORDS could not move, FORCE should. What kind of force ? The answer, which we gather from the subsequent sentence of the reverend dissenter, is scarcely sought to be cloaked. There cannot be the shadow of a doubt as to the interpretation which would be put, by ignorant and brutalized men, upon the word " force," referred to by the reverend gentleman. But he proceeded, as if startled  " Even at the sound himself had made," to deprecate such a mode of advancing towards the achievement of a political end as follows :—We give it in the same type.  "HE FELT CONVINCED THAT NO SUCH ATTEAIR  OUGHT TO BE MADE ON ANY PRETENCE WHATEVER"—(the consciousness of his clerical duty told him that the doctrine of killing no murder'—the doctrine by which regicides had sought to defend their crime—was not defensible on scriptural grounds, or even on scriptural morality; but mark the gingerly and delicate terms in which he virtually counterpoises the denunciation to which he had been constrained !) " BUT HE WAS PERSUADED OF THIS, THAT WHENEVER SIR ROBERT PEEL WENT TO HIS GRAVE, THERE WOULD BE BUT FEW TO SHED ONE TEAR OVER HIM"! !! How irresistibly this conclusion reminds one of the great Daniel ! " Don't hurt him, boys ; but if ye kill him, there will not be a wet eye at his funeral."  Well, this seditious, this inflammatory' speech, was, according to the Morning Chronicle, made on the 17th of July, and on the 18th of the same month was duly reported in that journal, from which we have copied it—shorn, perhaps,' by that organ of the League, of somewhat of the baseness which characterises it. In August parliament was dissolved. Shortly afterwards her Majesty and her Royal Consort, accompanied by Sir Robert Peel and the Court, proceeded on a visit to Scotland; and there it appeared that the carriage of the Premier was an object of attention to an individual of the name of M`Naughten;—the carriage in question, however, being occupied by his secretary, Mr. Drummond, who, throughout its route, from the city of Durham to Glasgow, was mistaken for the right hon. baronet himself. Upon the return of the royal cortege to England, the party was dispersed; the premier proceeding to his seat in Staffordshire. Shortly afterwards, it would seem that the individual, previously mentioned, betook himself to the Metropolis; and, in the beginning of January, began to parade the neighbourhood of the Government Offices, with a regularity which acquired for him the reputation of being a police officer. On the 20th of January, the secretary of Sir Robert Peel—the same gentleman who had been mistaken for him in Scotland by the miscreant before alluded to, was, treacherously as. sassinated in Parliament-street .by that individual, M‘Naghten; and subsequently, during his confinement, the intimation was made by him to the policeman in attendance, that it was his impression that he had shot Sir Robert Peel—the same party who had been pointed out as one whom a band of Sheffield patriots had marked for assassination, and over whose grave "