The Sun. — 1865-04-17 (London, England)

THE CASE OF PELIZZIONI.  Mr. Baron Channell having summed up the evidence, Tho Jury said they should like to retire, and they left the court at half-past 7 o'clock to deliberate. They were absent about 1(1 minutes, and then again retured into court and their names were called over.  Mr. Avery, the Clerk of Arraigns, then called over their names, and put the formal question to them, whether they had agreed upon their verdict, and whether they found the prisoner guilty or not guilty. • The Foreman, in an emphatic tone—We find that the prisoner is Not Guilty.  The instant the verdict was delivered there was a tremendous burst of cheering, and great number of persons in the court stood up and hurrahed frantically, at the same time waving their hats. It was useless to attempt to put a stop to the interruption, sheriffs, under-sheriffs, and others were alike powerless to prevent the unseemly proceeding. When the cheering seemed to lull a little it was taken up again, and joined in by the crowd outside the court, and the scene was most extraordinary.  Baron Channel, when he was able to make his voice heard, said that such a proceeding was most improper in a. court of justice, and if any one was pointed out to him as being concerned in the disturbance he should know how to deal with him.  Mr. Ribton (in the absence of Mr. Ballantine) then said that there was another indictment against the prisoner, which charged him with wounding Bannister, but he supposed that after the verdict that had just been returned the counsel for the Crown would not proceed with it. He therefore applied that a verdict of Not Guilty should be taken.  ide tt mo beeen tried,the Mr. Beasley said that the solicitor for the Treasury was not present at that moment, and he had no instructions with reference to this charge. and Mr.if Ri it bton said was in intended thetnhdaetd to jury whoheard all the facts would be the best tribunal had to dispose of it. gporisoonnweritwhastheentintlde Baron Channell said he shouldcertainly not take the case that night. (A laugh). Mr. Beasley, after a short delay, said he would take the responsibility upon himself, after what had occurred, of not offering any evidetco in support of the charge of wounding Bannister. The prisoner was then formally given in charge to the jury upon that indictment, and, no evidence being offered an congratulated of gentlemen him they again returned a verdict of not guilty, and this was the sequel for another enthusiastic burst of cheers. A d number upon the result shook han d of fwhiits benevolenth3lr. N egre exertions, ertions, and the prisoner was removed from the bar. The proceedings on Saturday occupied nearly ten hours. It is hardly necessary to remind the public that the prisoner is still under sentence of death for the murder of Harrington, and he must, of course, remain in custody until the Government decide what course shall be taken. As, however, it appeared to be admitted on all hands that one man only was guilty of the whole of the acts of violence that were committed on this night at the Golden Anchor, the present verdict is tantamount to his being declared entirely innocent, so that the natural result would be that a pardon should be granted him for the offence of which he at present stands convicted.  "And then he drew a dial frem his poke, And looking on it with lack lustre eye, Bays very wisely, It is ten o'clock : ' Thus we may see,' quoth ho, how tho world wags.'