The Sun. — 1851-05-22 (London, England)

DAUGHTER.  On the If ith inst., at Douro-place, Kensington, the wife of J. W. P. Gr aham, Esq. On the 21st inst., at Doncaster, the Wife of William' Marratt, Esq , coroner.  41 On the 17th inst., at Chiddingstone, Kent, the Rev. Henry W. 0. Polhill, rector of Illington, Norfolk, to Frances Charlotte, on'iy daughter of Henry Streatfeild, Esq., of Chlddingston e. On tb.e 19th inst., at St. lark's, Kennington, Captain Woodwaerd, H. M. sth Fusiliers, to Elizabeth, eldest daughter of th late . Johnson, Esq., of Rlichaelstown, county of Cork, Ireland, and widow of the late Capt. F. A. Robinson.  Gosford, 107 L, who deposed that the prisoner Lynn had Leen left in his care ; after he had been taken into the cell, and while sitting with him, I e asked him if he had been at the raffle at the White Lion publichouse, on the night before, and he replied that he had. He next inquired if he had left, the White Lion with the other prisoners, who were there, and he said e did, but added, that he had gone before them with a young woman, down Vauxhall•walk, and parted with her in Lambeth-walk, and that on his return be saw the policeman lying dead. Mr. Neill here complained of the conduct of the sergeant in putting these questions to the prisoner, without giving him the slightest caution, or anyintimation that the answers he should give would be used against him elsewhere. Thomas Jones, a shoemaker, was here sworn, and stated that on Monday morning, the sth instant, he was locked up in one of the cells connected with the court, on a charge of making away with a pair of boot-uppers belonging to his employer, when the prisoner Harrington was brought in and locked up with him. Soon after he heard him say that if he had 00 clinker in his hand he would split the policeman's head into pieces. In reply to the questions of the Magistrate, the witness said, that it was about nine O'clock in Or morning that those assertions were made by the prisoner, who was lying on one of the seats at the time, but not asleep. In reply to a question as to how often he had been in prison, he declared that he had never been locked up before the morning in question. Mr. Games applied for the discharge of FaheYl William Burke, Shanahan, and Slattery, against whom, he contended, there was not a tittle of evidence.  Mr. Neill also applied for the discharge of Thomes . Burke, Lynn, and Harrington, and said that swans; the former two there was no evidence whatever, sou that, notwithstanding the strange evidence given .14 the shoemaker against the latter, there was nothing to justify his further detention. Mr. ELLIOTT remarked that in a charge so serious as the present he felt it to be his duty to remand the whole of the prisoners, to give the officers engaged.!U the case sufficient time to make all the necessary 01' quiries, and get up the evidence ; but after the statements that had been made, and the evidence giyen,.be did not consider that he should be justified in detain: ing any of the prisoners besides Cane, Hickey, sr M'Ellyott, against whom the evidence was sub' ciently strong to send them for trial on the charge 0 murder. Harrington he should also remand to s future day with the other three prisoners, and all al° others should be discharged. The court, during the investigation, was much crowded.