The Sun. — 1867-07-05 (London, England)

ADVERTISEMENT.] —Holloway's Ointment and Pills._ (roam Diseases.—How many life-long maladies spring from neglecting trifling symptoms ? The pimple, readily curable in the nursery, becomes through carelessness the irremediable torment of after life. With the knowledge of the curative powers of Holloway's ointment and pills, those who fail to use them for extirpating the first seeds of hereditary ailments will have to bear the punishment resulting from their folly. Holloway's remedies will remove eruptions of the skin, scorbutic diseases, and scrofula, and heal every description of ulcer, wound, or abrasion. B the use of Holloway's excellent, speedy, and safe medicaments much pain and immense expense will be saved, and a great benefit conferred on the present and succeeding generations.  Professor Beesley at Exeter Hall.  Professor Beesly's language at the Exeter-hall meeting on Tuesday night appears to us to be as unjust and as disgraceful as anything that has been said of late by a man who has the ear of any considerable section of the public. He said, in reference to Governor Eyre, that he " was a murderer whose hands were red with the blood of more than 400 men, and this man committed his crimes in the interests of his employers as Broadhead committed his in the interest of the workmen of Sheffield." We will leave Mr. Beesley and the workmen of London to settle between them the question whether Broadhead committed his crimes " in the interest of the workmen of Sheffield," but to say that Governor Eyre murdered 400 men in the interests of his employers is both absurd and wicked. Governor Lyre's employer was the Home Government, which dismissed him from his office for what he did, and who had no more interest in the murder of 400 blacks than Professot Beesly had in the Sheffield outrages. To compare Governor Eyre's acts to Broadhead's is possible only to a man jaundiced with hatred of that class of "rich men" which Professor Beesley taunts with indifference to murder. Governor Eyre, under the influence, as we think, of an unfortunate panic, proclaimed martial law in accordance with the provisions of an Act of the Jamaica Legislature, in accordance with Jamaica precedents, and with the sanction of all the authorities of the island. Courts constituted under this proclamation did, as we think, irregularly and illegally put to death the number of persons stated, and, as we have always maintained, this was a great fault and may in strictness of law have been murder. But if the matter is regarded morally, there are infinite distinctions between these executions and Broadhead's assassinations. In the firstplace it is unquestionable that Broadhead knew he was committing murder; it is equally unquestionable that Governor Eyre thought, wrongly if you please, that he was doing what the law permitted and even required. Broadhead bad no legal authority, and represented at most what should have been a voluntary association. Governor Eyre represented the Queen of England, and was responsible for the lives and for the property of the population of Jamaica. Broadhead murdered men whose conduct was perfectly blameless morally and legally, simply because he disapproved it. Governor Eyre punished those whom he supposed (wrongly again if you please) to have committed crimes worthy of the severest punishment an I to have planned crimes which would have justified all he did. In a word, Broadhead was a systematic sneaking murderer, liar, and thief ; Governor Eyre was a mistaken and over-zealous officer of justice. The one was a murderer in the very worst sense of that worst of all words, the other was a murderer, if at all, by reason of the excessive severity and stringency of the English law on that subject. Professor Beesley, indeed, was good enough to say that " murder by trade unions was no better and no worse than any other murder." We beg to differ from him. Murders differ greatly in moral guilt. Broadhead's murder was far worse than many other murders ; worse, for instance, than a murder committed in a fair duel ; worse than a murder committed upon strong provocation, and in hot blood ; worse than a murder committed without premeditation in order to effect a less heinous crime. It was worse, in short, than any murder not committed with mature premeditation, by prolonged lying in wait, with the assistance of conspiracy, upon principle, for the sake of intimidation, and without provocation or excuse, by a coldblooded, lying fanatic, who had the hypocrisy to denounce his own diabolical villany as soon as he had carried it out. We are quite willing to admit that any other murder, not committed by a trade unionist, of which all these things could be affirmed, would be equally bad.—Pall Mall Gazette.