The Sun. — 1864-06-27 (London, England)

DROUYN DE LIIUYS. IKEDA TDIKOUGO NO KAMI. KAWATSOU IDZOU NO KAMI. KAWADA SAGAMI NO KAMI.  In addition to the above arrangement the Japanese ambassadors, charged by the Tycoon to offer to the government of the Emperor reparation for the attack of which a French officer (Lieutenant Camas) was victim in Japan, have engaged to pay as an indemnity a sum of 35,000 dollars, or 192,500 f., to be. Landed to the family of that officer. This payment was immtlliately cff:cted. Trie envoys of he Tycoon at the same time declared that their Government would take all necessary measures for detecting and punishing the murderers of Lieut. Camus.  The Ina'ipendance Beige says that the Japanese ambassadors were to have visited England, Holland, and Switzerland, but that, owing to political modi fications in their government, they hastily concluded their negotiations with France, in order to return home at once. It is said, however, that another embassy is to be sent to Europe at the commencement of next year. Courtesy of the Orleans Family.  A statement appeared some days back in the London Weekly Register (a Roman Catholic paper) to the effect that Bishop Grant, who was the celebrant at the marriage of the Count de Paris, had been treated by the family with great discourtesy. That statement, which was copied into the Monde of Paris, and commented upon in the same spirit, produced a certain sensation both among Legitimists and Orleanists. Finding that the article of the London paper was reproduced in a French journal, which did not express uny doubt of its accuracy, General Count Dumas has addressed the following letter to the Monde :  Sir,—lf the Abbe Guelle, Chaplain to the Queen Marie A delaiae, were not detained in attendance on the Duke de Montpensier, who has been dangerously ill, he would have given a contradiction to the misstatements in the W eekly Register, which you copied into your paper of yesterday. In his absence I feel bound to do so, as I am the person who was charged by her Majesty with the arrangements for the marriage of the Count de Paris. You say that the Catholic Bishop of Southwark, who performed the marriage ceremony, had reason to complain of the treatment he received. I deny this in the most distinct manner, and, to corroborate my denial, I refer you to Monseigneur Grant himself. He will tell you with what respect and affection he has been treated on every occasion by the Queen, and by every member of the family. As for the facts on which you faund that strange assertion, there is not a single one which is not absolutely contrary to the truth. In the hospitality offered to the guests at Claremont there was no distinction to make between Catholic children and Protestant, for the simple reason that the Royal Family had not invited children, " to add,' as you express it, " to the splendour of the ceremony," and consequently, some could not have been cared for and others neglected, The Protestant Dean of St. Paul's had not to say grace at the table of the Ro) al guests, as he was not present, not having been included in the number of English personages invited.  If Monseigneur Grant did not take part in the repast which followed the nuptial benediction, the reason is, that he preferred, as he did last year, on the occasion of the marriage of the Duke de Chartres, and in conformity to ecclesiastical usage, not coming to Claremont for a marriage feast. But Monseigneur Grant, as well as all the priests who assisted him, was received by the Abbe Guelle in the name of th- Queen, and a collation was specially prepared for him, at his own convenience, and in the place and at the hour which he himself had fixed upon. And as for what you say, Sir, with respect to the antiCatholic tendencies of the House of Orleans, I again refer you to the venerable Bishop of Southwark, He, lam convinced, will tell you that there is not a Catholic family in his diocess who performs all the duties of our religion with more exactness and piety than all the members of toe Orleans family,  I rely on your impartiality, Sir, for the insertion of the present letter in your next number; and I pray you zo receive the assurance of my distinguished consideration.  General Count C. DC'