The Sun. — 1841-02-10 (London, England)

BROUGHAM.theIan language and affected the sentiments  Since the above was in type, which a press of other matter compelled us to defer, No. 11. of the series in the Times, and the last, has appeared. The first attack has kindled the wrath of some of Sir ROBERT'S compromising friends, and the letters on the Tamworth oration are stopped. Some observations in it at the close, completely identify the writer, who signs " Catholicus," with the priest party. His objections to Sir ROBERT'S doctrines are, that they slur over or dissipate the passions, and do not by means of ref .?;ion aim to remodel- the heart of other words, the writer derides all knowledge as useless to rectify and enlighten conduct, except that of which the prie,,ts claim a monopoly. He quotes wise man instances of indiduals knowing their duty and neglecting to perform it; but Christians do that as well as heathens; and, at least, the man who does know his duty, is more likely to perform it than he who has no knowledge of it whatever. How a man ignorant of his duty is to do it, except, like the slaves of the Jesuits in Paraguay, they do what the priests tell them, we know not. To have this writer, who avows himself an admirer of hypocrisy, insincerity, and deceit, who thinks " too well" of Sir ROBERT PEEL, not to suppose that he deliberately brimmed the confiding people who lent him their ear and their minds at Tamworth, to impress on them the image of his own soul—to have this avowed enemy of knowledge and defender of the lowest and most despicable vice, identified with the priest party, is for us a great delight. It demonstrates clearly that they will stop at no falsehood, no guile, no deceit which serves to attain their end. They even brand their greatest leader as committing one of the paltriest tricks of low charlatans, and as being one of the paltriest of mankind.  The Paris Journals of Saturday and Sunday have been received. On Friday the Chamber of Deputies was engaged with the Customs' Bill. In the course of the debate M. VICTOR GRAN DIN had the peculiar French mob patriotism, and the French mob refinement of taste to oppose all commercial intercourse with England, alleging that if a treaty was concluded with us, a repetition might be expected .of our conduct towards China, to whom we say, " Receive our opium or we will murder you. Take your choice ; the poniard or the poison." The Constitutionnel and the Journal des Debcit's do not report these expressions, which we regret to add called forth no manifestation of disgust in the Chamber, but they figure very distinctly in the report of the debate which appears in the National of Saturday. The man who could utter them after the perusal of the first night's debate in the British Parliament, must be too contemptible for serious notice on this side of the Channel. We leave this man and his speech to the chastisement of the Journal des Debats, and the reflections which every honourable mind in France must make upon an outrage of all decency, truth, and international good feeling. The Journal des Debats of Sunday publishes the following letter, addressed by Admiral STOPFORD to the Governor of Malta dated the 14th of January : " Sir,-1 have the honour to make known to you that Mehemet Ali, having restored the Ottoman fleet, recalled his army from Syria, and accepted all the conditions which the Sultan had' offered him ; the port of Alexandria and the coast of Syria are no longer exposed to any hostility on the part of the Sultan or his Allies. (Signed) "