feat: add pipeline registry abstraction
Author: aarnphm
Pull request: yes

# What does this PR do?

<!--
Congratulations! You've made it this far! You're not quite done yet though.

Once merged, your PR is going to appear in the release notes with the title you set, so make sure it's a great title that fully reflects the extent of your awesome contribution.

Then, please replace this with a description of the change and which issue is fixed (if applicable). Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies (if any) that are required for this change.

Once you're done, someone will review your PR shortly (see the section "Who can review?" below to tag some potential reviewers). They may suggest changes to make the code even better. If no one reviewed your PR after a week has passed, don't hesitate to post a new comment @-mentioning the same persons---sometimes notifications get lost.
-->

<!-- Remove if not applicable -->

- added `PipelineRegistry` abstraction for better supports for custom pipeline. 
- updates `add_new_pipeline.mdx` (english docs) to reflect the api addition
- migrate `check_task` and `get_supported_tasks` from
  `transformers/pipelines/__init__.py` to
 ` transformers/pipelines/base.py#PipelineRegistry.{check_task,get_supported_tasks}`

Address #17762


## Before submitting
- [x] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Did you read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#start-contributing-pull-requests),
      Pull Request section?
- [ ] Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the [forum](https://discuss.huggingface.co/)? Please add a link
      to it if that's the case.
- [x] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
      [documentation guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/main/docs), and
      [here are tips on formatting docstrings](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/main/docs#writing-source-documentation).
- [x] Did you write any new necessary tests?


## Who can review?

@LysandreJik and @sgugger, would be great if you guys can provide feedback.

<!-- Your PR will be replied to more quickly if you can figure out the right person to tag with @

 If you know how to use git blame, that is the easiest way, otherwise, here is a rough guide of **who to tag**.
 Please tag fewer than 3 people.

Models:

- albert, bert, xlm: @LysandreJik
- blenderbot, bart, marian, pegasus, encoderdecoder,  t5: @patrickvonplaten, @patil-suraj
- longformer, reformer, transfoxl, xlnet: @patrickvonplaten
- fsmt: @stas00
- funnel: @sgugger
- gpt2: @patrickvonplaten, @LysandreJik
- rag: @patrickvonplaten, @lhoestq
- tensorflow: @LysandreJik

Library:

- benchmarks: @patrickvonplaten
- deepspeed: @stas00
- ray/raytune: @richardliaw, @amogkam
- text generation: @patrickvonplaten
- tokenizers: @n1t0, @LysandreJik
- trainer: @sgugger
- pipelines: @LysandreJik

Documentation: @sgugger

HF projects:

- datasets: [different repo](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets)
- rust tokenizers: [different repo](https://github.com/huggingface/tokenizers)

Examples:

- maintained examples (not research project or legacy): @sgugger, @patil-suraj
- research_projects/bert-loses-patience: @JetRunner
- research_projects/distillation: @VictorSanh

 -->


Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._

> Note that this is only to customize preprocessing and/or postprocessing as this still relies on existing auto-model classes.

Should I include inside the docs to use an `AutoModel` class for better readability?

@Narsil CI failed due to the recent `black` versioning locked?

Super nice PR thanks for this addition !

Left a few NITs about the structure. Feel free to ignore if you don't agree with them

> @Narsil CI failed due to the recent `black` versioning locked?

Seems like `black` released a new version and the CI is not locking it, right @sgugger  ?
https://pypi.org/project/black/

Yes, you'll need to rebase on main to fix the tests. Failures are due to new releases of black and PyTorch.

> Yes, you'll need to rebase on main to fix the tests. Failures are due to new releases of black and PyTorch.

understood. Address accordingly.

cc @LysandreJik @sgugger @Narsil when you guys have time.

That's very nice, love this approach! Should make it much much simpler to add custom pipelines.

I only have one request: please add tests :smile: 

cc @LysandreJik for tests. I'm thinking to add a test for log capture output, but I'm not too familiar with transformers logging structure.

If you want to test outputs, we have a util for this called `CaptureStd`. You can see an example of use in [this test](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/9fe2403bc52e342022ed132561655f84a6b6b7f3/tests/utils/test_cli.py#L30).

> If you want to test outputs, we have a util for this called `CaptureStd`. You can see an example of use in [this test](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/9fe2403bc52e342022ed132561655f84a6b6b7f3/tests/utils/test_cli.py#L30).

Thanks. Will update accordingly.

tests are finished. lmk if any additional testing is required. cc @LysandreJik 

Failure is flaky, so merging. Thanks again for your contribution!