Supporting Seq2Seq model for question answering task
Author: karthikrangasai
Pull request: yes

# What does this PR do?

Add the `run_seq2seq_qa.py` example for supporting seq2seq models to QA tasks.

<!--
Congratulations! You've made it this far! You're not quite done yet though.

Once merged, your PR is going to appear in the release notes with the title you set, so make sure it's a great title that fully reflects the extent of your awesome contribution.

Then, please replace this with a description of the change and which issue is fixed (if applicable). Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies (if any) that are required for this change.

Once you're done, someone will review your PR shortly (see the section "Who can review?" below to tag some potential reviewers). They may suggest changes to make the code even better. If no one reviewed your PR after a week has passed, don't hesitate to post a new comment @-mentioning the same persons---sometimes notifications get lost.
-->

<!-- Remove if not applicable -->

Fixes #13029 


## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
- [x] Did you read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#start-contributing-pull-requests),
      Pull Request section?
- [x] Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the [forum](https://discuss.huggingface.co/)? Please add a link
      to it if that's the case.
- [x] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
      [documentation guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/master/docs), and
      [here are tips on formatting docstrings](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/master/docs#writing-source-documentation).
- [x] Did you write any new necessary tests?


## Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

<!-- Your PR will be replied to more quickly if you can figure out the right person to tag with @

 If you know how to use git blame, that is the easiest way, otherwise, here is a rough guide of **who to tag**.
 Please tag fewer than 3 people.

Models:

- albert, bert, xlm: @LysandreJik
- blenderbot, bart, marian, pegasus, encoderdecoder,  t5: @patrickvonplaten, @patil-suraj
- longformer, reformer, transfoxl, xlnet: @patrickvonplaten
- fsmt: @stas00
- funnel: @sgugger
- gpt2: @patrickvonplaten, @LysandreJik
- rag: @patrickvonplaten, @lhoestq
- tensorflow: @LysandreJik

Library:

- benchmarks: @patrickvonplaten
- deepspeed: @stas00
- ray/raytune: @richardliaw, @amogkam
- text generation: @patrickvonplaten
- tokenizers: @n1t0, @LysandreJik
- trainer: @sgugger
- pipelines: @LysandreJik

Documentation: @sgugger

HF projects:

- datasets: [different repo](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets)
- rust tokenizers: [different repo](https://github.com/huggingface/tokenizers)

Examples:

- maintained examples (not research project or legacy): @sgugger, @patil-suraj
- research_projects/bert-loses-patience: @JetRunner
- research_projects/distillation: @VictorSanh

 -->


Comments:
@NielsRogge I do not have the resources to run the trainer on the said device to provide the duration and scores of the model. 
What should I do in this case ?

Also, I looked at the checks that ran on CircleCI and I am afraid that the test I have written is not running i.e. the output says 
```
### MODIFIED FILES ###
- examples/pytorch/question-answering/run_seq2seq_qa.py
- examples/pytorch/test_examples.py

### IMPACTED FILES ###
- examples/pytorch/question-answering/run_seq2seq_qa.py
- examples/pytorch/test_examples.py

### TEST TO RUN ###
```

For the test, will fix this morning. There is a bug in our module that fetches the proper tests to run. Thanks for flagging there was a problem!

Fix for the examples tests not being run is in [this PR](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/pull/13604), you will need to rebase on master when it's merged.

@sgugger surely.

Also, I had asked about the dataset in the review you had provided earlier. Will SQuAD work as all the QA datasets have context in some format another ?

Yes, it's fine.

Thank you :)

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread.

Please note that issues that do not follow the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) are likely to be ignored.

@karthikrangasai - the PR looks very nice already. It would be great if we could try fixing the test so that we can merge it :-)

Hello @patrickvonplaten , sorry I missed this failing test. I will fix it in some time, sorry for the delay.

During the evaluation phase, at this [line](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/c7ccb2e77976931b5738c5d0f89c3de7bb4c5278/src/transformers/trainer.py#L2285) the model return logits as float instead of int which is later causing an error when trying to run a tokenizer decode on the list of floats.

Could someone guide me on how to fix this ?

I am unsure why you would want logits to be integers. Also you should use the `--predict_with_generate` for evaluation.

@sgugger Thank you for the help. Addition of the flag `--predict_with_generate` helped here. I didn't want logits to be integers, but the input to decode had to be integers. I didn't that communicate well enough. Sorry for the confusion there.

Thanks for fixing the test!