nntsuzu/KFTT huggingface dataset:
English: The third ones are official documents, and they are sometimes interweaved in the descriptive part of the text with 'documents submitted from shogun's vassals and others' as above.
Japanese: 3番目は公文書類であるが、2番目の上記「御家人などから提出された文書」同様に、地の文の中に織り込まれていることもある。
English: Some were preserved in the office like Mandokoro and used as source materials for "Azuma Kagami," while some drafts, made by government officials or documents to inform under secretary of Mandokoro and Monchujo of the decisions made at the meeting held by Tokuso family, were handed down in the families of under secretary of Mandokoro and Monchujo, and then used for "Azuma Kagami."
Japanese: また、それが政所などの役所に保管されていたものもあれば、その文を書いた事務官僚の下書きが、あるいは得宗家の寄合での決定が政所執事や問注所の執事などに伝えられたその文書が、その政所や問注所の執事の家に伝えられて、『吾妻鏡』の編纂時に収録、あるいは原史料として利用されたと思われる。
English: For example, according to the entry from "Azuma Kagami" dated May 1, 1254, 'There is an announcement about taking hostages. … Taking hostages must be prohibited. This announcement has been sent from Soshu to Monchujo. 勧湛・實綱・寂阿奉行たり'
Japanese: 『吾妻鏡』1254年（建長6年）5月1日条の「人質の事（人間を質入すること）沙汰有り。・・・凡そ御制以後質人の事は、一向停止すべきの由と。此の如く申し沙汰すべきの旨、相州より問注所に仰せらると。勧湛・實綱・寂阿奉行たり」などはその例である。
English: The text of this additional law No. 299 can be read in "A Collection of the Historical Material on the History of Law System in Medieval Ages," and the addressee is OTA Minbu-daifu, (meaning the under secretary of Monchujo, MIYOSHI no Yasutsura) so it would have been handed to the Miyoshi clan (the Ota clan).
Japanese: この幕府追加法299の本文が『中世法制史料集』で知られるが、そちらでは宛先に大田民部大夫殿とあり、このとき問注所の執事であった三善康連のことであり、三善氏（大田氏）に伝えられたのだろう。
English: As to the descriptions about Jisho-Juei War, preciseness of information in the fourth record depends on whether they are directly related to Kamakura or not.
Japanese: 4番目であるが、治承・寿永の乱については、鎌倉が直接関与する部分と、そうでない部分では情報の正確さには相当の開きがある。
English: In particular, information on the activities of MINAMOTO no Yoshinaka in the Hokuriku district were not fully and quickly provided to Kamakura in those days, and most of the information seems to have been supplemented with the material from the vicinity of Kyoto written in much later.
Japanese: 特に源義仲の北陸での動向などは、当時の鎌倉には断片的に、かつ相当遅れてしか情報は伝わらず、ほとんどの部分については、かなり後の京都近辺からの資料により補っていると見られる。
English: For example, the entry in "Azuma Kagami" dated August 13, 1181, says that an Imperial order to send a punitive force against Yoshinaka KISO was issued.
Japanese: 例えば『吾妻鏡』の1181年（養和元年）8月13日条の記述には木曽義仲追討の宣旨が出されたとある。
English: "Hyakuren-sho," which was also compiled later as well as "Azuma Kagami," contains an account saying that 'an Imperial order to send a punitive force against Yoshinaka was issued.'
Japanese: 『吾妻鏡』と同じく後年の編纂である『百錬抄』にも、このときに「義仲追討の宣旨が出された」との記載がある。
English: However, the diaries of court nobles, for example, the entry "Gyokuyo," dated August 6, 1181, doesn't have the name of Yoshinaka KISO.
Japanese: しかし同じ事件について当時書かれた公家の日記、例えば『玉葉』1181年（養和元年）8月6日条には木曽義仲の名は無い。
English: In fact, the Heike side didn't intend to hunt down and kill Yoshinaka at this stage, and it was the Kai-Genji (Minamoto clan) who tried to do so.
Japanese: 実はこの段階では平家側には義仲追討の意識はなく、意識していたのは甲斐源氏である。
English: It was two years later in the entry "Gyokuyo" dated May 16, 1183, that the name of Yoshinaka first appeared in the diary of court noble in Kyo.
Japanese: 京の公家の日記に初めて義仲の名が登場するのはそれから2年後の『玉葉』1183年（寿永2年）5月16日条が初見である。
English: Kazuhiko UESUGI pointed out that "Hyakuren-sho" and "Azuma Kagami" were compiled years later, and the compilers would have had preconceived notions that the battle at Hokuriku was fought to prevent Yoshinaka KISO invading Kyo because he fought up to Kyo through Hokurikudo.
Japanese: 後世の編纂である『百錬抄』や『吾妻鏡』は、その後木曾義仲が北陸道から京に攻め上ったことから、北陸での戦いは木曾義仲の進路を塞ぐ為との刷り込みがあり、そのための編者の誤解であろうと上杉和彦は指摘している。
English: Looking back on it now, we have the strong notion that it was MINAMOTO no Yoritomo and Yoshinaka KISO who stood against the Taira family, but in fact all areas in the country rose in rebellion against the rule of the Taira family.
Japanese: 今から見れば、平家に立ち向かったのは源頼朝と木曽義仲との印象が強いが、実際には当時全国で平家支配に対する蜂起が起こっている。
English: Although the point mentioned above is based on indirect evidence, Kuniji YASHIRO, at the beginning of the Taisho period, collated "Azuma Kagami" with various historical materials to analyze the source materials more closely, finding out that it was based on the diaries of court nobles and many Kyo line materials.
Japanese: 前述の点は状況証拠の域を出ないが、大正時代初期の八代国治は、より直接的な史料批判、史料解剖として『吾妻鏡』と諸史料との突き合わせを行い、公卿の日記その他、京系の多く史料が原出典となっていることを見つける。
English: And he presented the 29 parts of the text in question with records which seemed to be the source materials.
Japanese: そして『吾妻鏡』の該当箇所と、オリジナルであろうとするものの該当箇所、計29ヶ所を具体的に紹介した。
English: Among them, 14 parts, almost half of them, used "Meigetsuki" by FUJIWARA no Teika as materials.
Japanese: その内、藤原定家の『明月記』が資料として使われているとされる部分は非常に多く、14ヶ所とほぼ半分を占める。
English: Because of these things, YASHIRO concluded that although "Azuma Kagami" takes a form of diary, it was definitely compiled in later ages.
Japanese: そしてそれらのことから、『吾妻鏡』は日記の体裁を取りながらも、明らかに後世での編纂物であると八代は断定する。
English: The relationship these materials have with the literature as pointed out by Kuniji YASHIRO have been considered in later years, and Fumihiko GOMI concluded that there was no indication that "Gyokuyo," a court noble's diary during the period of Genpei War, and "Kikki" were used as source materials.
Japanese: 八代国治が指摘した文献との関係ついてはその後も検証がなされ、現時点で五味文彦らは、源平合戦時代の公家の日記『玉葉』や『吉記』などが利用された形跡は無いとしている。
English: There is also no sign that "Heike Monogatari," "Jokyu-ki," and "Rokudai Shojiki" (A Story of Events of Six Emperors) were used, so it is believed that each historical material (records of battles) which came to be a foundation of the work was each used in its own respective way.
Japanese: また、『平家物語』や『承久記』、『六代勝事記』も使われた形跡は無く、それぞれの元となった史料（合戦記）をそれぞれの視角で利用したのではないかとする。
English: Although there were some modifications, some quotations from "Meigetsuki," "Kinkai Wakashu" (The Golden Pagoda-Tree Collection of Japanese Poetry), and others were identified, and as YASHIRO pointed out, "Jikkinsho" (A Miscellany of Ten Maxims) was also probably used for the public commendation of achievements.
Japanese: そうした修整はあるものの、『明月記』の他、『金槐和歌集』からの引用などは確かに確認されているし、また八代の指摘ではないが『十訓抄』なども顕彰記事に利用された可能性が高い。
English: Excluding mistakes made carelessly by the compilers and errors in the source materials used, there were other misrepresentations in the text that were made intentionally, and those, along with the eulogy, are going to be discussed here.
Japanese: 編集者の意図しないミス、用いた史料からの誤謬を除いて、ここでは意図的な曲筆と顕彰について述べる。
English: Needless to say, we have to pay careful attention to them in order to use "Azuma Kagami" as a historical material.
Japanese: 言うまでもなく、それが『吾妻鏡』を歴史資料として利用する上で、もっとも注意しなければならない点だからである。
English: The records of Shogun Yoriie were misrepresented most in "Azuma Kagami," and everyone considers that the end of the rule by the Minamoto clan, which had lasted for three generations, was brought by the son who was unworthy of his father.
Japanese: 『吾妻鏡』の曲筆のもっとも甚だしいのが頼家将軍記であり、源氏が三代で終わったのはこういう不肖の息子が居たからかと誰しも思っている。
English: However, there is no evidence to prove that it was a portrayal based on reality, on the contrary there are uncountable doubts that it might be a misrepresentation.
Japanese: しかし、それが真実の姿であった証拠は何もなく、逆に曲筆と疑われるものは無数にある。
English: According to "Azuma Kagami," Yoriie decided to retire into priesthood on September 7, 1203, and left the post of shogun, which was right after Yoshikazu HIKI's Incident on September 2, 1203, and the account dated September 10 says that MINAMOTO no Sanetomo decided to succeed to shogun.
Japanese: 頼家が将軍の座を降りたのは『吾妻鏡』によると1203年（建仁3年）9月2日の比企能員の変の直後、『吾妻鏡』1203年（建仁3年）9月7日条での頼家出家であり、9月10日条で源実朝が将軍を継ぐことが決定したとある。
English: And the death of Yoriie was recorded in the entry dated July 19, in the following year, 1204.
Japanese: そしてその頼家の死は翌年の1204年（元久元年）7月19日条である。
English: However, the messenger from Kamakura who brought the news that Yoriie had died of disease on September 1 arrived at the Imperial court in Kyo in the early morning of September 7, 1203, and the emperor demanded to appoint Sanetomo as Seii Taishogun (literally, "great general who subdues the barbarians"), which was recorded in Iezane KONOE's diary, "Inokuma Kanpaku-ki," "Meigetsuki" by FUJIWARA no Teika, and "Prince Narisuke's Diary" by Prince Narisuke SHIRAKAWAHAKUOKE.
Japanese: しかし京の朝廷には、9月1日に頼家が病死したという鎌倉からの使者が1203年（建仁3年）9月7日早朝に到着し、実朝を征夷大将軍に任命するよう要請していることが近衛家実の『猪隅関白記』、藤原定家の『明月記』、白川伯王家業資王の『業資王記』などによって知られている。
English: Although it was when Yoriie was still alive and hadn't actually retired into priesthood.
Japanese: 頼家が存命どころかまだ出家（退位）もしていないにもかかわらずである。
English: "Azuma Kagami" says that it was the notorious second wife of Tokimasa HOJO, Maki no Kata (Lady Maki) who tried to depose Shigetada HATAKEYAMA, who was popular with people, and Yoshitoki HOJO opposed murdering Shigetada HATAKEYAMA, speaking with fervor against his father, Tokimasa.
Japanese: 『吾妻鏡』の中では、人望厚い畠山重忠を追い落とした人物は北条時政の後妻で悪名高き牧の方とされ、北条義時は畠山重忠の謀殺に反対して、父時政に熱弁をふるう。
English: He said to his father, 'Why do we have to plan to kill him now? If we discard our exploits of war achieved frequently and hastily punish him with death, we are to regret it.'
Japanese: 「今何の憤りを以て叛逆を企つべきや、もし度々の勲功を棄てられ、楚忽の誅戮を加えられば、定めて後悔に及ぶべし」と。
English: The readers who take "Azuma Kagami" as a historical novel might believe it, but nobody who reads this as historical material accepts it as true without question.
Japanese: 歴史小説と同じ感覚で『吾妻鏡』を読む者はともかく、歴史史料としてこれを読む者にこの記述を鵜呑みにする者はいない。
English: It is difficult to determine if Kagetoki KAJIWARA was made to chase him down by the Hojo clan's stratagem, and if Yoshimori WADA and Yoshikazu HIKI were defeated mainly due to the Hojo clan, but it is widely known that such truth can't be found in "Azuma Kagami."
Japanese: 梶原景時は北条氏の策略とまでは言えないがいうまでもなく追い落とした側、和田義盛、比企能員についても、主に北条氏に滅ぼされたものであり、それらの真相を『吾妻鏡』から知ることは出来ないことも定説となっている。
English: Also, right after Yoritomo took up arms and before entering Kamakura, there were some vassals like Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE and Tsunetane CHIBA who led a large brigade of bushi from Boso and were to have very different fates later.
Japanese: それとは別に、頼朝の挙兵直後、まだ鎌倉へ入る前に、房総の大武士団を率いて馳せ参じ、その後明暗を分けた御家人に同族の上総介広常と千葉常胤が居る。
English: Yoritomo forced Kagetoki KAJIWARA to murder Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE, but the reason why he did it is not written even in "Azuma Kagami."
Japanese: 上総介広常は頼朝が梶原景時に殺させたが、その理由は『吾妻鏡』でも明らかではない。
English: However, Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE was depicted as a person who is destined to be murdered later in "Azuma Kagami."
Japanese: ただし、『吾妻鏡』には上総介広常は後に殺されることを予感させるような人物像として描かれる。
English: It says that Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE was a rough man who was not loyal to the Minamoto family like Tsunetane CHIBANOSUKE.
Japanese: 上総介平広常は千葉介常胤の様な源家に対する忠君の士ではなかった、粗暴な男だったと。
English: The most conspicuous example is an anecdote about Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE's first meeting Yoritomo on September 19, 1180.
Japanese: その最たるものは1180年（治承4年）9月19日条上総介広常が初めて頼朝に会ったときの話しである。
English: Citing "Shomonki," he had two different thinking in his mind of plotting to kill Yoritomo if he had a chance, but he threw his malicious intent away to see Yoritomo's dauntless attitude, and averted a conflict following him.
Japanese: 『将門記』の古事をひきながら、場合によっては頼朝を討ってやろうと「内に二図の存念」を持っていたが、頼朝の毅然とした態度に「害心を変じ、和順を奉る」という下りである。
English: Such examples are usually dressed up by the compilers; first of all, it is impossible for the compilers in later ages to know what Hirokazu himself was thinking.
Japanese: こういう場合は文飾がほとんどとされるが、だいたい広常が内心思ったことを何故後世の編纂者が知り得たのだろうか。
English: Besides, according to "Azuma Kagami," the forces Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE led then consisted of 20,000 warriors on horseback, but "Enkeibon Heike Monogatari" says 10,000 warriors, and "Genpei Tojo-roku" (A Record of Genpei Battles) says 1,000, meaning "Azuma Kagami" exaggerated the number most.
Japanese: 尚、このとき上総介広常が率いてきた軍勢は『吾妻鏡』では2万騎とあるが『延慶本平家物語』には1万騎、『源平闘諍録』には1千騎であり、『吾妻鏡』が一番誇張が大きい。
English: It is conjectured that the closest number to reality would be 1,000 warriors on horseback (about 3,000 people) as depicted in "Genpei Tojo-roku," roughly estimated from the crop of rice yielded in the Kazusa Province from the early Edo period to the early Kamakura period.
Japanese: 上総国の江戸時代初期の石高から鎌倉時代初期の石高を概算しても、『源平闘諍録』の1千騎（約3千名）ぐらいが実状に近いと推定される。
English: And Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE was killed by Yoritomo on December 22, 1183, and most of his lands were owned by Tsunetane CHIBA, Yoshimori WADA, and the Miura clan.
Japanese: そして1183年（寿永2年）12月22日に上総介広常は頼朝に殺され、その所領の大半は千葉常胤、和田義盛ら三浦氏のものとなる。
English: The entry dated September 9, 1180 is very famous, and Tsunetane CHIBA said, 'I was moved to tears and could say nothing to hear that Yoritomo is trying to restore the Minamoto family after its fall,' and the advice Tsunetane CHIBA gave then is always quoted to consider why Yoritomo chose Kamakura.
Japanese: 1180年（治承4年）9月9日条は実に有名な下りで、千葉常胤は「源家中絶の跡を興せしめ給うの條、感涙眼を遮り、言語の覃ぶ所に非ざるなりてえり」と感動して涙ぐむ、そして頼朝は何故鎌倉を選んだのかという話しに必ず引用されるのもこのときの千葉常胤の献策である。
English: It is because Kamakura is an area of 'Gonoseki' (ancient site) or 'Yogai no chi' (an impregnable fortress), or in other words a natural castle.
Japanese: 鎌倉は「御曩跡」の地、「要害の地」、つまり天然の城だからというのである。
English: However, for Tsunetane CHIBA, Yoritomo's father MINAMOTO no Yoshitomo was not a man to whom he felt indebted, which is clear to see if one looks at what happened at Soma-mikuriya, the private estate of Soma ranch.
Japanese: しかし千葉常胤にとっては、頼朝の父・源義朝は「御恩」を感じるような相手ではないことは相馬御厨での経緯を見れば明らかである。
English: Koichiro KURODA said that there is indication that MINAMOTO no Yoshitomo was not the head at that stage, and tried to deprive those at the same level as himself of land.
Japanese: 黒田紘一郎は、源義朝はその段階では棟梁などではなく、同じレベルで領地を奪おうとした形跡があるとする。
English: Tsunetane CHIBA's family and Hirokazu KAZUSANOSUKE supported Yoritomo not because both of them were followers of the Minamoto clan as "Azuma Kagami" says, but because they wanted to resist the oppression by the Fujiwara clan of Shimousa and the Satake clan of Hitachi which were related to the Taira family by making Yoritomo their leader, and it was their last-ditch plan to retrieve their own domains which had been deprived.
Japanese: 千葉常胤の一族、そして上総介広常が頼朝に加担したのは、『吾妻鏡』にいうような、両氏が累代の源氏の郎等であったからではなく、平家と結んだ下総の藤原氏、そして常陸の佐竹氏の圧迫に対して、頼朝を担ぐことによってそれを押し返し、奪い取られた自領を復活する為の起死回生の掛けであった。
English: Incidentally, according to the entry dated on August 29, 1180, 'Buei (MINAMOTO no Yoritomo) went to Ryoshima, Heihoku District, Awa Province by ship taking Sanehira with him.'
Japanese: ところで、1180年（治承4年）8月29日条の「武衛實平を相具し、扁舟に棹さし安房の国平北郡猟島に着かしめ給う。」とある。
English: Tokimasa HOJO also once crossed over Awa, but he soon headed for Kai and didn't accompany Yoritomo.
Japanese: 北条時政も一旦は安房へ渡ったがすぐに甲斐に向かい頼朝に同行してはいない。
English: The family line of Yoshitsura SAHARA of the Miura clan, as well as the Chiba clan, can tell the details of this time period, and if we assume that such family traditions were captured in "Azuma Kagami," everything can be consistent.
Japanese: この期間を詳細に後世に伝えられる家としては千葉氏を筆頭に、あとは三浦氏の佐原義連の家系であり、それらの家に伝えられた伝承が『吾妻鏡』に取り込まれたと仮定すれば全ては符合する。
English: Yasunobu (Zenshin) MIYOSHI was the father of Yasutsura MIYOSHI of Monchujo mentioned above, and his record would have been used as one of the bases for compiling the book.
Japanese: 先に触れた問注所の三善康連の父、三善康信（善信）であるが、確かに彼が残した記録が編纂のベースのひとつとして利用されたであろう。
English: However, we have to be careful because there are many intended or sometimes blatant eulogies of Yasunobu MIYOSHI in the accounts concerning him.
Japanese: しかし注意しなければならないのは、三善康信自信に関わる記述の中に、彼を意図的に、ものによっては露骨な顕彰と見られるものが非常に多いことである。
English: Kuniji YASHIRO examined "Meigetsuki" intensely to find that the entry dated November 4, 1211 in "Azuma Kagami," was an abbreviated version of the entry dated October 23, 1211 in "Meigetsuki."
Japanese: 八代国治は『明月記』を集中的に検証を加え『吾妻鏡』1211年（建暦元年）11月4日条を見つけるが、これは『明月記』1211年（建暦元年）10月23日条を若干縮めて書いたものである。
English: Besides, there is an entire copy in the entry dated the following year, 1212, from "Meigetsuki," the entry dated July 27, 1212 which reads '適有造営事,須上臈上卿宰相弁奉之歟.'
Japanese: 更に翌年の1212年（建暦2年）には「適有造営事、須上臈上卿宰相弁奉之歟」と『明月記』1212年（建暦2年）7月27日条の丸写しがある。
English: Kuniji YASHIRO says that both of them were written as a comment or suggestion by Yasunobu MIYOSHI, which is evidence that "Azuma Kagami" was compiled in later ages, and he conjectured that the leading compilers of "Azuma Kagami" were the descendants of the Miyoshi clan, Machino and the Ota clan.
Japanese: 八代国治はこの2件とも、三善康信の評、または献策として書かれており、『吾妻鏡』が後年の編纂物である証拠であって、またそしてこのことからも、三善氏の子孫たる町野、大田氏が『吾妻鏡』編纂の中心に居たのではないかと推測する。
English: In recent years, Fumihiko GOMI pointed out that as to Yasunobu MIYOSHI's arrival at Kamakura in April 1184, there seems to be intentional praise for him in the entries dated April 14 and 15, 1184, saying that 'he was determined to head for Kanto region from the beginning' and 'he should support the political affairs' respectively, and how he was 'quite dubious' about the entries.
Japanese: 近年では五味文彦も、1184年（寿永3年）4月に三善康信が鎌倉に参着したときの記述、1184年（寿永3年）4月14日条の「本よりその志関東に在り」、翌4月15日条の「武家の政務を補佐すべきの由」などに顕彰の意図を感じており、「相当に疑わしい」と指摘する。
English: Zenshin (Yasunobu MIYOSHI) often appears in the episodes as a whole, for example, in the entry dated June 9, 1191, at the marriage between Yoshiyasu ICHIJO and Yoshitsune KUJO, Sadaisho (Minister of the Left), the wedding clothes were late to arrive, and Masako HOJO, Midaidokoro (Shogun's wife) or Yoritomo, who arranged them, was in a 'bad temper,' but Zenshin's 'excellent turn of phrase' made Masako or Yoritomo 'amused' and saved the people from the trouble.
Japanese: また1191年（建久2年）6月9日条には、一条能保の娘の左大将九条良経との婚姻に際しその衣装が遅れ、その沙汰をした御台所北条政子か頼朝が「御気色不快」になったときに善信（三善康信）が「秀句」を語って怒っていた政子か頼朝は「御入興」でお咎めを回避したなど、総じてエピソードのたぐいによく登場する。
English: The entry concerning OE no Hiromoto which has received the most attention so far is the one dated November 12, 1185, about his advice to establish the positions of 'Shugo and Jito' (provincial military governor and estate steward).
Japanese: 大江広元に関してこれまで最も注目されてきたのは、1185年（文治元年）11月12日条の有名な「守護地頭」設置を献策したという下りである。
English: According to the entry dated November 28 of the same year, Tokimasa HOJO demanded the Imperial court to establish 'Shugo and Jito.'
Japanese: 同年11月28日条には北条時政がその「守護地頭」の設置を朝廷に要求したと書かれている。
English: Although "Gyokuyo" by Kanezane KUJO has a record concerning the same matter, it doesn't contain the words 'Shugo and Jito.'
Japanese: しかし同じ事実を書き記した九条兼実の『玉葉』には「守護地頭」とは書かれていない。
English: Tadashi/Sho ISHIMODA got to the heart of a problem in 1960, pointing out that the words 'set the Shugo and Jito at each province' can be seen in the other historical materials in the late Kamakura period, therefore it was not based on the governments original record but on the common view widely accepted at the time.
Japanese: 1960年に石母田正はこの問題に鋭く切り込み、「諸国平均に守護地頭を補任し」は鎌倉時代の後期には他の史料にも見えることから、これは幕府独自の記録によったものではなく、鎌倉時代の後期の一般的な通説に基づく作文ではないかと指摘した。
English: The analysis by Tadashi ISHIMODA encouraged a lively argument about the appearance and status of Shugo and Jito, and now this stage of Shugo and Jito is considered to be Kunijito-sei, a provincial Jito system, which is the previous stage of the Shugo system.
Japanese: そしてその石母田正氏の分析に端を発して、守護・地頭の発生、位置づけについて活発な議論が巻き起り、現在ではこの段階は国地頭制として、守護制の前段階とされる。
English: Aside from 'Shugo and Jito,' it would be OE no Hiromoto who suggested 'providing food (5-sho per tan) regardless of private estate or public estate,' which was written in "Gyokuyo" in 1185, the diary of a court noble who was on the side of the Imperial court.
Japanese: 「守護地頭」はともかく、1185年（文治元年）当時の朝廷側の公卿の日記『玉葉』にもある「庄公を論ぜず、兵粮（段別五舛）を宛て催すべし」との要求の献策は大江広元が行ったのだろう。
English: However the words 'the Second Rank (MINAMOTO no Yoritomo) was particularly satisfied and decided as he was told,' seem to have been added to the book together with the words 'Shugo and Jito' when it was compiled later.
Japanese: しかし「二品殊に甘心し、この儀を以て治定す。本末の相応、忠言の然らしむる所なり」は「守護地頭」の言葉とともに後年の編纂時に追加されたものと思われる。
English: Records of Shogun Yoriie and Sanetomo seem to have been based mostly on the written record by Yukimitsu NIKAIDO, but his records also seem to contain intentional compliments.
Japanese: 頼家・実朝将軍記では二階堂行光の筆録が多く利用されたと見られているが、その二階堂行光にも意図的な顕彰と見られる記事がある。
English: On that day, MINAMOTO no Sanetomo visited Yoshitoki HOJO's residence (Soshu gyotei), but he was obliged to stay there because of the lunar eclipse.
Japanese: その日源実朝は北条義時の家（相州御亭）を訪れたが月蝕の為に逗留を余儀なくされた。
English: Then Yukimitsu NIKAIDO told the old story of Emperor Shirakawa, impressing Yoshitoki HOJO.
Japanese: そこで二階堂行光は白河天皇の古事を語り「相州殊に御感」と北条義時を感心させたと。
English: Kuniji YASHIRO also pointed out that there is a part which the compiler must have transcribed from "Kinkai Wakashu."
Japanese: また、『金槐和歌集』から編纂者が採録したのであろうとされる部分もあることを八代国治が指摘している。
English: The entry is dated December 19 and 20, 1213, but in "Kinkai Wakashu" it is dated December, 1212.
Japanese: 1213年（建保元＝建暦3）12月19日条から翌20日条なのだが、『金槐和歌集』では1212年（建暦2年）12月とある。
English: The contents are neither a falsehood nor gilding, but it would be certain that the compiler had an intention of praising Yukimitsu.
Japanese: その内容は決して嘘偽りでも粉飾でもないが、編者の行光顕彰の意図があったことは間違いあるまい。
English: It is the famous entry dated April 8, 1200 that says people tend to relax their wariness when they are not involved in a political dispute directly, but they should be more careful.
Japanese: 直接の政争以外はつい警戒心を解いてしまうが、もう少し注意せねばというのが有名な1200年（正治2年）4月8日条である。
English: One of the powerful nobles, Wakasa-zenji Yasusue, former Governor of Wakasa Province, assaulted a wife of a vassal's follower (bushi) at Rokujo Street Madenokoji Avenue in broad daylight.
Japanese: 有力貴族の一員若狭前司保季が、御家人の郎等（武士）の妻を白昼六條万里小路に於いて犯す。
English: The follower got angry and chased the man taking his sword, and he killed the noble at Rokujo-south, Madenokoji-west, within Taira Gate facing Kujo.
Japanese: 怒ったその武士が太刀を取ってこれを追い、六條南・万里小路西、九條面平門の内でその貴族を斬り殺した。
English: The follower was captured, and a post-horse was sent from Rokuhara in Kyo in order to judge the man.
Japanese: その武士を捕らえてあるが、どう裁こいたらよいだろうと京の六波羅から早馬が来る。
English: OE no Hiromoto asked Yasutoki HOJO's opinion about it, and he replied, 'it is a sin against Bushi's duty for a follower to kill those who are eligible to enter the In and other palaces, to say nothing of the fact that it happened on the street in a broad daylight. He should be punished at once.'
Japanese: それに対して大江広元から意見を求められた北条泰時は、「郎従の身として諸院宮昇殿の者を殺害するなど、武士の本分にもとる行為だ。それも白昼路上で行うなどもってのほか。直ちに厳罰に処すべきである」と言ったと。
English: This crime itself was written in the entry dated March 29, 1200 in "Meigetsuki," FUJIWARA no Teika's diary, and the words which appeared to be said by Yasutoki were copied from the comment made by FUJIWARA no Teika.
Japanese: 事件そのものもは、実は『明月記』1200年（正治2年）3月29日条での藤原定家の日記に書かれていた事件で、泰時が語ったという台詞は藤原定家の感想を写したものである。
English: As for Tokiyori HOJO, Kuniji YASHIRO pointed out the account of his death in the entry dated November 22, 1263.
Japanese: 北条時頼について八代国治が指摘するのはその卒去の記述『吾妻鏡』1263年（弘長3年）11月22日条である。
English: Although it sounds very impressive, the words '業鏡高懸,三十七年,一槌撃砕,大道坦然' in '頌云' were entirely copied from "増集続伝燈録妙堪," though only the year appearing in the poem composed on his deathbed was changed.
Japanese: 実に感動的なのだが、「頌云」の「業鏡高懸、三十七年、一槌撃砕、大道坦然」は『増集続伝燈録妙堪』の伝記にある遺曷の年齢を変えただけのものである。
English: It is impossible for Tokiyori, who had become a believer in Zen Buddhism, to have had anything to do with this poem that quoted from another persons.
Japanese: 遺曷を他人の引用で済ませるなどということが、禅宗に帰依した時頼にとって宗旨上もあり得たことだろうか。
English: Also, the following is written in the entries dated November 29 and 30 in 1241.
Japanese: また『吾妻鏡』1241年（仁治2年）11月29日条と翌11月30日条にはこういうことが書かれている。
English: A conflict between the leading vassals of the Miura and Oyama clans arose because of a trivial problem, taking them right to the brink of war.
Japanese: 有力御家人の三浦氏と小山氏との間で、ささいなことから端を発してあわや一戦にという事件が起った。
English: At this incident, Tokiyori's older brother, Tsunetoki HOJO, armed his followers and sent them to support the Miura clan, who he thought had a good reason to fight.
Japanese: 時頼の兄の北条経時はこの事件で一応理のある三浦氏を助勢しようと配下の者を武装させて差し向けた。
English: Their grandfather, Yasutoki HOJO got angry and said, 'each of them is to be a regent in the future. There is no need to get involved in the vassals' argument. Tsunetoki's behavior was quite thoughtless, and he should be confined to his residence for a while.'
Japanese: 二人の祖父である北条泰時は「各々将来御後見の器なり」、つまり二人とも将来執権になろうという者であるのに、経時は「諸御家人の事に対し、爭か好悪を存ぜんか。所為太だ軽骨なり、暫く前に来るべからず」と怒り。