-- DBMS: bigquery
CREATE TABLE `fh-bigquery.hackernews.commentsV2`
(
  title STRING,
  url STRING,
  text STRING,
  dead BOOL,
  `by` STRING,
  score INT64,
  time INT64,
  timestamp TIMESTAMP,
  type STRING,
  id INT64,
  parent INT64,
  descendants INT64,
  ranking INT64,
  deleted BOOL,
  level INT64,
  story_id INT64,
  fake_date DATE
)
PARTITION BY fake_date
CLUSTER BY id;

INSERT INTO `fh-bigquery.hackernews.commentsV2` (title, url, text, dead, by, score, time, timestamp, type, id, parent, descendants, ranking, deleted, level, story_id, fake_date) VALUES (NULL, NULL, 'Is luck evenly distributed? If so, then at least on one level of abstraction, is not the world fair? If it is not evenly distributed, then by what mechanism is luck parceled out to individuals?<p>Bill Gates may be lucky in that he had little choice over the circumstances in which he was born into, but did not his parents make decisions that led to a better outcome? His luck could be said to be the merit of his ancestors.', NULL, 'joyeuse6701', NULL, 1552064560, '2019-03-08 17:02:40+00:00', 'comment', 19339404, 19337216, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 19337216, '2000-01-01'), (NULL, NULL, 'As far as I can tell, that article should properly be titled &quot;A belief that life is a meritocracy is not only false, it&#x27;s morally wrong&quot;.<p>Most of the author&#x27;s problems seem to revolve around the fact that real life is not actually a pure meritocracy, not in the idea that meritocracy itself is a bad ideal.  Even his examples where people show bias in assessment of others when they believe they are operating in a merit-based system are just examples that the system is not actually merit-based.<p>What I find disappointing is that the author does not even bother to offer even a hint at an alternative.', NULL, 'rmah', NULL, 1552058757, '2019-03-08 15:25:57+00:00', 'comment', 19338305, 19337216, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 19337216, '2000-01-01'), (NULL, NULL, 'I am annoyed by the article&#x27;s use of Bill Gates to exemplify the &quot;fortuitous circumstances that figure into every success story&quot;. Bill Gates and Microsoft is not &quot;every success story&quot;. I would be surprised to find even a hardcore believer in an ideologized meritocracy who thought that tail events like Bill Gates and Microsoft didn&#x27;t have a huge luck component.<p>Meritocracy-as-strong-just-world-hypothesis is a weak-man argument.<p>I am a believer in meritocracy. But, I note, I&#x27;m not a believer in any ideological big-M Meritocracy. Rather, I think meritocracy is the best practical way we know to organize things. In a liberal society, rather than get everybody to agree on the latent virtues they love the most, I think it makes sense to have demonstrated capability as a common ground evaluation metric. As another poster in the thread suggests, what do you want from your surgeon if not demonstrated capability?', NULL, '1787', NULL, 1552057763, '2019-03-08 15:09:23+00:00', 'comment', 19338121, 19337216, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 19337216, '2000-01-01'), (NULL, NULL, 'Belief in meritocracy is yet another version of the just-world fallacy. If you belief in a just world, you need to fight off any counter evidence. This leads automatically to discrimination. Same thing with merits and success. To not acknowledge happenstance and luck is a huge red flag for me.', NULL, 'blastbeat', NULL, 1552053831, '2019-03-08 14:03:51+00:00', 'comment', 19337524, 19337216, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 19337216, '2000-01-01'), (NULL, NULL, 'It seems most people don&#x27;t realise that &quot;meritocracy&quot; was coined half a century ago as a sarcastic term for a possible dystopia.  One in which many people now find themselves.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Meritocracy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Meritocracy</a>', NULL, 'gumby', NULL, 1552063690, '2019-03-08 16:48:10+00:00', 'comment', 19339253, 19337216, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 19337216, '2000-01-01');