text: 73,58,1296044140858191874,460069521,Andrew Francis,"Very stoked with this new little paper, joint with Mike Steel (Canterbury) and Dan Huson (Tübingen): ""Normalising phylogenetic networks”. We show how every phylogenetic network has an associated canonical normal network!  <LINK> @robynaraujo Oh thanks, what a nice thing to say!",https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07797,"Rooted phylogenetic networks provide a way to describe species' relationships when evolution departs from the simple model of a tree. However, networks inferred from genomic data can be highly tangled, making it difficult to discern the main reticulation signals present. In this paper, we describe a natural way to transform any rooted phylogenetic network into a simpler canonical network, which has desirable mathematical and computational properties, and is based only on the 'visible' nodes in the original network. The method has been implemented and we demonstrate its application to some examples. ",Normalising phylogenetic networks,2,"['Very stoked with this new little paper, joint with Mike Steel (Canterbury) and Dan Huson (Tübingen): ""Normalising phylogenetic networks”.\n\nWe show how every phylogenetic network has an associated canonical normal network! \n\n<LINK>', '@robynaraujo Oh thanks, what a nice thing to say!']",20,08,278