text:   of star-forming galaxies at $\mathbf{3.1 \lesssim z \lesssim 3.5}$",9,"[""After over a year of being in the works (counting the pandemic), I'm excited that our paper reporting the discovery of 11 new spectroscopically confirmed candidate Lyman continuum (LyC) leakers in the GOODS-S field is out now!\n\n<LINK>\n\nShort thread below (1/5)"", 'We use ground based LyC imaging and compile spectra from publicly available surveys, mainly from VANDELS (LBGs) and MUSE (blind) to measure the LyC escape fractions. only 6% of galaxies have any LyC leakage, with the majority of the sample giving an upper limit of fesc&lt;7% (2/5)', 'Interestingly, we do not find any strong dependence of the measured LyC escape fraction for 11 new candidate leakers on their stellar masses or specific star-formation rates, as can be seen in the plots below: (3/5) https://t.co/a5e89E4pzS', 'At these redshifts, the [OIII]+Hb lines fall in the observed K band, and we measure these line strengths by including nebular emission in SED fitting. Once again, no strong dependence of fesc is found on the [OIII]+Hb line strengths: (4/5) https://t.co/srfjTSN0nO', 'It remains observationally unclear which physical property regulates high LyC leakage. We argue that orientation and timescales may play a role in actually detecting LyC leakage, and the presence of young clusters within galaxies could be important. (5/5)', ""@jorryt_m Cheers! Typical MUV is ~ -21, so comparable to Steidel+2018 I'd say and its encouraging to get similar results.\nIndeed IGM stochasticity may play a role in masking correlations, which we touch upon in the paper too!"", ""@astrobellatrix Ooh so sorry about that -including MUSE redshifts thanks to your and your team's amazing work was just too tempting ;) I hope we'll arrive at similar conclusions and will keep an eye out on your results too! Thanks :)"", '@astrobellatrix Yes that was a really cool paper. MUSE results are generally absolutely fantastic I must say!', ""@maximetrebitsch That is an excellent point actually - we haven't explored the dust content angle here, but it is indeed something that could definitely play a role in an orientation-based scenario... Kind of similar to IGM stochasticity in effect(?) More zoom-in simulations please!!""]",21,09,2121