niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Students without home internet would be at a disadvantage.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets help students better prepare for a world immersed in technology.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: A world of technology needs education that uses said technology.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Plain text books do not adequately prepare students for the real technological world.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Files on one tablet can be downloaded onto any other tablet, increasing flexibility and convenience for teachers and students.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Files on tablets can be easily shared.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets allow greater flexibility.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Files can be shared to any other tablet for easy sharing.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets can easily send and receive all information any other student and teacher may have.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets lower the amount of paper teachers have to print for handouts and assignments, helping to save the environment and money.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: More e-books mean less environmental waste.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Using a tablet is so intuitive that it makes learning fun and easy.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Because tablets are easy to use, students find them fun.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets are easy to understand and make learning fun.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: The average battery life of a tablet is 7.26 hours, shorter than the length of a school day.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets contain many technological features that cannot be found in print textbooks.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Textbooks alone can't keep up with modern technology.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets let the students see information in new ways.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets allow teachers to better customize student learning.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Student learning can be customized using tablets
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets make it easier to adjust individual learning plans for students.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: 81% of K-12 teachers believe that "tablets enrich classroom education."
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: There is a ratio of 81% of the K-12 teachers who believe "tablets enrich classroom education."
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: A good 81% of K-12 teachers believe when it is said "tablets enrich classroom education."
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: High-level education officials support tablets over textbooks.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: High-level education likes the use of tablets over textbooks. 
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets may be too difficult for less-technologically-savvy students to operate.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Not all students are tech savvy enough to operate a tablet.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets may be too difficult for less technologically savvy students
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Students may increase the number of excuses for not doing their schoolwork if tablets replace textbooks.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: If textbooks are replaced with tablets, students will come up with more excuses for not doing their schoolwork.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets increase the number of excuses
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: People who read print text comprehend more, remember more, and learn more than those who read digital text.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Students learn better from books than from screens.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets enable students to cut corners or cheat on schoolwork.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets pose greater risk to academic integrity than textbooks.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Many textbooks are not available in digital format or on the specific tablet used by a school.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: There are many types of tablets and some do not have the textbooks needed in the school.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: If tablets replace textbooks in K-12, there may be instances where the required textbook is not available.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets help students learn more material faster.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets increase student material absortion.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets cause students to learn material more quickly.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: E-textbooks on tablets cost on average 50-60% less than print textbooks.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: There is a 50-60% cost reduction for getting books tablets than printing them physically.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: The cost of printing textbooks vs getting them on a tablet means there is a 50-60% reduction in price to get them on a tablet than printed.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: On a tablet, e-textbooks can be updated instantly to get new editions or information.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Unlike textbooks, online texts are more easily updated.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: New information is much easier to add to e-texts than traditional texts.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets can hold hundreds of textbooks on one device, plus homework, quizzes, and other files, eliminating the need for physical storage of books and classroom materials.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets are able to store hundreds of textbooks on one single device, including homework, quizzes and files and it also takes away the need to have to store books and materials for the class physically.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: It is possible for a tablet to hold hundreds of textbooks on one device itself, which includes homework, quizzes, files of other nature and helps to remove the need to physically store classroom materials and books.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets are more susceptible to theft than print textbooks.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Print textbooks are less likely to be stolen than tablets.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets pose a greater risk to personal security as they are more prone to theft.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Students who own tablets purchase and read more books than those who read print books alone.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets are shown to increase student reading.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Students read more on tablets than on paper.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Manufacturing tablets is environmentally destructive and dangerous to human health.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Replacing textbooks with tablets can lead to dangerous consequences for human and environmental health.
Output: undermine
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets help to improve student achievement on standardized tests.
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets assist students in passing exams.
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: A school breakfast gives all students an equal start to the day
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: School breakfast is a great way to give all students a balanced and healthy start to their day.
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Free breakfasts for school children ensures a healthy start equally for all.
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Nutrition is the parents responsibility
Output: undermine
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: School students are to arrive every morning having had a nutritious breakfast.
Output: undermine
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Parents should provide a nutritious breakfast to their children every morning before they arrive at school 
Output: undermine
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: A school breakfast for all is a greater cost on schools
Output: undermine
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Schools are best places to ensure good nutrition
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Good nutrition can be provided effectively to our children at school.
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Breakfast teaches about health
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: A healthy breakfast improves students concentration
Output: support
claim: Provide breakfast for all school students.
 perspective: Government should focus on the most needy
Output: support
claim: We have to consider a large scale cyber attack an act of war.
 perspective: Definition of a large scale cyber attack is extremely vague 
Output: undermine
claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
 perspective: Lowering the age of consent will cause criminal dangers. 
Output: undermine
claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
 perspective: If the consent age is lowered, more people will be in danger.
Output: undermine
claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
 perspective: Lowering the age of consent will increase crimes and potential victims.
Output: undermine
claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
 perspective: There will be more criminal danger if the age of consent is lowered
Output: undermine
claim: It is a good idea to have a system of  participatory democracy.
 perspective: Participation Is Good In Itself
Output: support
claim: It is a good idea to have a system of  participatory democracy.
 perspective: Participatory Democracy Preserves our Natural Liberty 
Output: support
claim: It is a good idea to have a system of  participatory democracy.
 perspective: Participatory Democracy Produces Better Decisions 
Output: support
claim: It is a good idea to have a system of  participatory democracy.
 perspective: Participatory Democracy Facilitates the Misrepresentation of Issues 
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Translation allows greater participation by academics in global academia and global marketplace of ideas
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Academic participation is improved on a global scale with the use of translation of academic work.
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: It is prohibitively expensive to translate everything and difficult to prioritize what to translate
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Deciding what to translate is timely and costly.
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: It is better to have fewer languages in common use in global academic and economic interrelations
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Global relations between countries and academias benefit from fewer and more universal languages being implemented.
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: The West has no particular obligation to undergo such a sweeping policy
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Countries in the West have no responsibility to translate their academic work.
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Translating academic work is not neccessary for countries in the West.
Output: undermine
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Translation expands the knowledge base of citizens to help solve local problems
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Citizens can resolve problems affecting them locally through the translation of various academic works.
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: Translation gives access to students to learn valuable information and develop their human capital and to become academically and economically competitive
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: The translation of academic work gives students a better oppurtunity to learn crucial info and improve their academic capabilities.
Output: support
claim: Subsidise the translation of academic work in the languages of developing countries.
 perspective: A student can improve academically and become more competitive through the translation of important academic work.
Output: support
claim: Technological advancement promotes materialistic society.
 perspective: "Materialistic" by whose standards - and why would technology make people more materialistic than what they already are?  
Output: undermine
claim: A legal qualification is worth the cost.
 perspective: The debt incurred in the pursuit of a law degree limits options both within the legal industry, and outside of it, by compelling recipients to seek out the highest paying jobs.
Output: undermine
claim: A legal qualification is worth the cost.
 perspective: Failing a law degree can be extremely costly. 
Output: undermine
claim: Create an international treaty/ban on cyber-attacks.
 perspective: A cyber treaty benefits everyone
Output: support
claim: Create an international treaty/ban on cyber-attacks.
 perspective: States will monitor each other, and an international body could be set up
Output: support
claim: Create an international treaty/ban on cyber-attacks.
 perspective: It would never work
Output: undermine
claim: Create an international treaty/ban on cyber-attacks.
 perspective: Arenas of potential conflict must be regulated
Output: support
claim: Create an international treaty/ban on cyber-attacks.
 perspective: Unlike warfare cyber-attacks don’t kill so they don’t need to be restricted in the same way
Output: undermine
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs are untrustworthy
Output: undermine
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs are unpredictable.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs can not be trusted.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs can be made much more legitimate by regulation
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs attract less attention and suspicion and can carry out their role more effectively.
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs are a valuable resource
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs have an equally strong incentive to perform.
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: strong incentive to perform is equal with PMCs
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: PMCs provide a service that may be otherwise unavailable.
Output: support
claim: We have to employ mercenaries.
 perspective: there are some services that you cannot get without PMC's
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Multiple vaccines serve millions with improved immunity 
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: All vaccinations are tested rigorously before they are approved, and tracked afterwards 
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Vaccinations have to past rigorous testing before and after approval
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Cases prove that vaccines have bad consequences for children’s health
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: There are cases to prove that our children's health is negatively affected by vaccines. 
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Childhood Vaccines are NOT Safe
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Vaccines are bad for children’s health, cases prove
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Multiple vaccines cause no harm 
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: There is no reason to believe that multiple vaccines, such as Tdap, cause any harm to the patient
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: There are no links between multiple vaccines and autism or multiple sclerosis
Output: support
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: More vaccines together destroy the immune system 
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: The immune system is destroyed by more vaccines. 
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Vaccines  taken together are destroying the immune systems. 
Output: undermine
claim: Receiving multiple vaccines are safe.
 perspective: Several vaccines Dysregulate The Immune System
Output: undermine
claim: Western democracies should openly try to circumvent Internet censorship in oppressive regimes.
 perspective: This policy alienates the oppressive regimes and stifles the change that discourse and positive interaction can bring
Output: undermine
claim: Western democracies should openly try to circumvent Internet censorship in oppressive regimes.
 perspective: Circumvention of internet censorship will galvanize more severe, physical repression to compensate its need for security
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Quota-led gender equality in executive boards will help shape a gender sensitive and highly performing business environment.
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: EU gender quotas have promoted gender equality in executive boards, creating an environment suited to producing high performance results, ultimately benefiting the greater economy of the member state
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Executive boards are becoming more gender-equal, which has helped shape professional cultures that are gender sensitive and performance driven, increasing their overall contribution to the member state's economy
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: More women in the labour market leads to higher GDP 
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Increasing numbers of women workers due to gender quotas has increased the GDP in many EU countries
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Gender quotas and increasing numbers of women workers continue to push EU member states' GDPs higher
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Quotas encourage women to pursue education and professional job positions 
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: More women are attending college and entering the professional job market due to gender quotas that are proving economically advantageous for EU member states
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Gender quotas are proving to have significant advantages as more women are seeking education and increasing their economic potentials as they enter the job market. 
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: There is no clear link between gender quota and economic growth
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Economic growth is not associated with implementation of gender quotas.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Use of gender quotas has not been found to improve economic growth.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: The EU should be more active in combating the abuse of human rights.
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: The EU needs to help those suffering from human rights abuses
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Gender equality is based on fundamental human rights endorsed by the EU which needs to be addressed
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Public and private institutions should hire people based on skills not gender to achieve positive economic impact 
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Positive economic impact is only possible if institutions hire people on the basis of skill not gender.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Institutions should focus on hiring people on the skills they possess, not their gender to ensure a positive economic impact.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: There are other policy options that are less distortive and more advantageous for the economy. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: Other policies exist that are more beneficial to the economy than gender quotas.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: The situation in these countries is improving, no need for a new policy. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: We should not try to fix what isn't broken and what is fixing itself.
Output: undermine
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: The EU’s reputation can only benefit from a strong policy on women’s rights 
Output: support
claim: Gender quotas in the EU are advantageous for the economies of member states.
 perspective: There is no down side to a strong policy on women's rights being adopted by the EU.
Output: support
claim: The leaking of military documents by Anat Kamm was justified.
 perspective: National security should come before freedom of information
Output: undermine
claim: The leaking of military documents by Anat Kamm was justified.
 perspective: The military can only be held to account if there is transparency
Output: support
claim: The leaking of military documents by Anat Kamm was justified.
 perspective: Transparency can only hold the military accountable
Output: support
claim: The leaking of military documents by Anat Kamm was justified.
 perspective: There should be transparency to hold the military accountable
Output: support
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: The State should be separated from the Church or churches.
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: There should be separation of Church and State . 
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: The State should be separated from the Church. 
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: Morality and religion should not have to be linked.
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: We do not need to link morality and religion together. 
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: Morality and religion are two different things. 
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: Religious instruction should be taught inside the home, not in public schools.
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: Religion belongs in the home, not schools. 
Output: undermine
claim: Ten Commandments:  Display in Schools.
 perspective: There is not a place for religion in public schools. 
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Punishments should be the same
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: The penalties for these crimes should be the same for everyone.
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Everyone should be punished in the same way. 
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Everyone should be treated equally
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Under the law everyone is equal, and fair treatment is mandated for all. 
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Such measures would be unfair and unjust
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Doing this would not be the right thing to do.
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: These acts would not be fair or in accord with the law. 
Output: undermine
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Celebrities endorse drug abuse
Output: support
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Celebrity behavior makes drug abuse look glamorous.
Output: support
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: The way celebrities act can seem to make doing drugs a good thing. 
Output: support
claim: Celebrities who commit drug-related offences should be punished more harshly than non-celebrities.
 perspective: Drug addiction isn't the addict's fault.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The product of an individual's intellectual endeavour is the property of that individual, who deserves to profit from it
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Individuals deserve to profit from the product of their intellectual endeavor because it is their property.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The product of an individuals intellectual endeavour is their property and therefore they deserve a profit from it.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Intellectual property rights allow individuals to release their inventions into the public domain
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Individuals are allowed to release their inventions into the public domain because of intellectual property rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: It is possible for individuals to release their inventions into the public domain because of intellectual property rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Costs of monitoring intellectual property rights by states and companies outweigh the benefits, and is often ineffective:
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Monitoring intellectual property rights by states and companies outweighs the benefits because of the cost and is often in effective.
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The benefits of monitoring intellectual property rights by states and companies is outweighed and often ineffective because of the cost.
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: There is no such thing as intellectual property, since you cannot own an idea:
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment of time and money in developing new products
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The investment of time and money in developing new products is incentivised by intellectual property rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Developing new products and the investment of time and money it takes is incentivized by intellectual property rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The complicated legal arrangements created by intellectual property raise costs of doing business:
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: The cost of doing business is raised by intellectual property because of complicated legal arrangements.
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Because the legal arrangements created by intellectual property is complicated the cost of doing business is raised.
Output: support
claim: Intellectual property rights have to be abolished.
 perspective: Firms and individuals misallocate resources trying to race others to the same goal, and spend resources stealing from one another:
Output: support
claim: Corporations’ Use of IP Laws in Relation to Event Sponsorship Poses a Threat to Freedom of Expression.
 perspective: Governments and corporations have been complicit in an effective ‘privatization of language’.
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining leades to pay crises in the public sector
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining causes public sector pay crises
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining Leads to an Overpaid Public Sector
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining can lead to overpaying the public sector.
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining leads to overpayment of the public sector.
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining is Needed to Voice Opinion
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: In order to have voices heard, collective bargaining is needed.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: We must maintain collective bargaining to hear all voices.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining has been recognised as an enforcable right
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining is a Right.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: We have the right to collective bargaining.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is detrimental to democracy.
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining undermines the democractic process
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is undemocratic
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining Hurts the Democratic Process
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Democracy is hurt by collective bargaining.
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is a counter to the creation of natural monopolies
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Natural monopolies require collective bargaining.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is helpful with monopolies.
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining counters the power of natural monopolies
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective Bargaining is Especially Necessary in the Case of Natural Monopolies
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is a necessary aspect of democracy
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Democracy requires collective bargaining
Output: undermine
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: Collective bargaining is not a right
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: There is no right to collective bargaining
Output: support
claim: Abolish collective bargaining rights for unions.
 perspective: No one has a right to collective bargaining
Output: support
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Transparency prevents, or corrects, mistakes
Output: support
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Transparency would make mistakes easier to prevent or identify.
Output: support
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Without transparency, mistakes would be easier to come by and more difficult to correct.
Output: support
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: In security too much transparency endangers lives
Output: undermine
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Too much transparency can be dangerous.
Output: undermine
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Putting all your information out there is not safe.
Output: undermine
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Too much transparency can come at the cost of human lives
Output: undermine
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Lives can be endangered if there is too much transparency 
Output: undermine
claim: Transparency is necessary for security.
 perspective: Transparency can result in normalisation
Output: undermine
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Governments can re-define industry standards by choosing open source software.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Open source software can help the government re-define the industry.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Industry standards can be re-defined by governments choice to use open source software.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Open source software is more adaptable to government needs. 
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Open source software is more expensive for governments in the long run. 
Output: undermine
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Open source software is too costly int he long run for governments.
Output: undermine
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Government would incur too much of an expense in the long run using open source software.
Output: undermine
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Government contracts can change the software industry for the better.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: The software industry can better positively affected by government contracts.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: It's possible for the software industry to be benefited by government contracts.
Output: support
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: Open source software undermines national security.
Output: undermine
claim: governments should choose open source software in order to encourage its use.
 perspective: The national security is undermined by open source software.
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Considering the amount of data governments produce, compelling them to publish all of it would be counterproductive as citizens would be swamped. 
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: The government produces too much data to make it all available to the public.
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: It would take citizens too long to go through all of the government data so they only produce what is necessary for understanding.
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Compelling public bodies to publish information ensures that non-citizens, minors, foreign nationals and others have access to information that affects them.
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Less incentive to study at university
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Most universities are publically funded so should have to be open with their materials.
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Since tax dollars fund most public universities, the general public should have free access to these materials.
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Most universities are supported by government funds, so they should have to make their course material open.
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Making everything free to access will damage universities ability to tap private funding
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Universities will struggle with private funding if all provided resources become free
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Opening up resources to free access can be damaging to universities
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Universities deserve to profit from their work
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Universities should be directly profiting from their services
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Universities deserve to add costs to their resources instead of leaving them open to the public, restricting profits
Output: undermine
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Openness benefits research and the economy
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Openness benefits all parties involved, including research and the economy
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Openness is widely beneficial
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Students would be able to benefit from being able to use resources at other universities
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Universities being open with resources can benefit students a great deal
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Students do better when other universities have open resources
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Opens up education
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Education should be open to all.
Output: support
claim: There should be a presumption in favour of publication for information held by public bodies.
 perspective: Everyone should have access to education.
Output: support
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: Desalination plants can rapidly overcome water scarcity.
Output: undermine
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: Water scarcity can be addressed by desalination plants.
Output: undermine
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: 3900 children die everyday in the World due to water-related diseases.
Output: support
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: In 2020, an additional 17% of fresh water will be required to satisfy human needs
Output: support
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: In the near future we will require more fresh water to sustain human needs.
Output: support
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: Our water requirements will be higher in the future.
Output: support
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: As far as we pay for the water we consume, we can use it as we wish.
Output: undermine
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: Countries can depend on rainfall to get more water supply
Output: undermine
claim: There is a world Water crisis.
 perspective: Countries water supply depend on rainfall
Output: undermine
claim: Nollywood could be an effective instrument to change perceptions of Africa.
 perspective: Encouraging film entrepreneurs
Output: support
claim: Nollywood could be an effective instrument to change perceptions of Africa.
 perspective: Development from within
Output: support
claim: Nollywood could be an effective instrument to change perceptions of Africa.
 perspective: By developing from withing their community, perception could improve
Output: support
claim: Nollywood could be an effective instrument to change perceptions of Africa.
 perspective: Building from withing could improve perceptions from outsiders
Output: support
claim: Nollywood could be an effective instrument to change perceptions of Africa.
 perspective: Epitomising rising Africa
Output: support
claim: Animals should be kept in zoos.
 perspective: By observing animal behaviour we can help those in the wild
Output: support
claim: Animals should be kept in zoos.
 perspective: Animals should be left in the wild
Output: undermine
claim: Animals should be kept in zoos.
 perspective: Animal research may be valuable, but it does not need to happen in the context of confinement and human entertainment.
Output: undermine
claim: Animals should be kept in zoos.
 perspective: Human understanding can help animals
Output: support
claim: Animals should be kept in zoos.
 perspective: Wild Animals Are Not Domesticated
Output: undermine
claim: Climate Change is the end of the world.
 perspective: NO. It has become a new and fashionable way of attacking capitalism
Output: undermine
claim: Climate Change is the end of the world.
 perspective: It will affect everybody
Output: support