niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity leads to spam
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Span proliferates with anonymity on the internet.
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity increases cyberbullying and trolling
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Individuals are more likely to bully and troll when they are anonymous.
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Cyberbullying and trolling are more common when people's internet activity is anonymous.
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to experiment and construct with new social identities
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: People are able to create new social identities when the internet is anonymous.
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: The anonymity of the internet allows people to create new social identities for themselves.
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity allows internet users to engage in illegal activities 
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: When internet users are anonymous, they are more easily able to engage in illegal activities.
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: There is less deterrance to illegal activities on the internet when people are able to remain anonymous.
Output: undermine
claim: Sports initiations should be banned.
 perspective: Encourages binge drinking and bullying
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself
Output: undermine
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity
Output: undermine
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical
Output: undermine
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Introducing chess would preserve the spirit of the ancient Olympic Games
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play
Output: undermine
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive.
Output: support
claim: Chess must be at the Olympics.
 perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports.
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: It would make the UNSC more effective and efficient
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: Argument 2: UNSC sanctions become powerless without PM
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: Any decisions imposed by the previous Security Council risk being annulled when the new members rotate in.
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: UN sanctions would lose power, as they could be revoked by the new Security Council.
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: It will lead to fair regional representation, as well as make it more legitimate and flexible
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: With rotation in its membership, the UN Security Council would be a more fair and flexible in its representation.
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: By removing permanent membership, the Security Council would be viewed as more legitimate, as it can better represent all regions of the world.
Output: support
claim: There should be no permanent members of the UN Security Council.
 perspective: Argument 1: PM serves interests of developing countries
Output: support
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Bullies will not understand only if you talk to them, you need actions!
Output: support
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Harmful to others around them
Output: support
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Bullies create a harmful environment.
Output: support
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Individuals do not feel safe in the hostile environments created by bullies.
Output: support
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: There are different levels/degrees of bullying
Output: undermine
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: One needs to look at the specific bullying behavior.
Output: undermine
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Bullying behavior varies greatly and individual instances need to be taken into account.
Output: undermine
claim: Persistent Bullies Should be Expelled.
 perspective: Expelling a child will make them worse.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarianism is healthier 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Being vegetarian reduces risks of food poisoning
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It is cruel and unethical to kill animals for food when vegetarian options are available. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: If there are meat-free options available, it is brutal and immoral to kill animals for food
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It is deplorable and unconscionable to take the life of an animal for food when one has a choice to eat vegetarian meals
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It is immoral to kill animals 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: The right to eat what we want, including meat, is a fundamental liberty that we must defend. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Humans can choose their own nutrition plan 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Individuals have a right to eat meat if they want to.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: People have a right to eat meat or anything else that they want to.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: We may accept that we have the right to eat meat
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Being vegetarian helps the environment  
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There are problems with being vegetarian
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet reduces overuse of antibiotics. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Anitbiotics aren't used in vegetarian foods.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets result in a reduction of antibiotic usage.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets are not necessarily better for the environment. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There is no evidence that vegetarian diets help the environment. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: People who eat meat are not harming the environment. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets aren't always more environmentally friendly
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarianism doesn't always help the environment
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Human anatomy has evolved to support a primarily vegetarian diet. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: The human body has changed over time to be able to handle a largely vegetarian diet
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: The internal organs of humans have changed over time to support a diet that is free of meat
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet reduces the chances of developing kidney stones and gallstones. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Risk of kidney stones and gallstones can be reduced with a vegetarian diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarians do not live longer. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: People who eat meat live just as long as vegetarians.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarians die at the same rate as meat eaters.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarians have average lifespans
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarianism makes no difference in longevity
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective:  vegetarians are 40 % less likely to have cancer
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat has been an essential part of human evolution for 2.3 million years. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Our bodies were not designed for a vegan diet
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: The evolution of humanity has progressed due to meat eating for 2.3 million years.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It has been vital for humans to eat meat for over 2 million years.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet lowers the risk of heart disease. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A diet devoid of meat lowers the risk of heart disease.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet provides a more healthful form of iron than a meat-based diet. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Iron from a vegetarian diet is healthier than from a meat-based diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet is a healthier way to get iron than from a meat-based diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet can help alleviate world hunger. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: World hunger can be reduced with a vegetarian diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating a vegetarian diet can lead to less hunger around the world.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat provides healthy saturated fats, which enhance the function of the immune and nervous systems. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Saturated fats in meat help the immune and nervous system.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Lean red meat, eaten in moderation, can be a healthful part of a balanced diet. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Red meat can be unhealthy if eaten in large quantities and too often but is healthy in moderation. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A balanced and healthy diet consists of vegetables and lean red meat. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Lean red meat can be healthy
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Lean red meat is not necessarily unhealthy
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Animals can also die as a result of vegetarian diets.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Animals will still die even if everyone were to follow a vegetarian diet.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets can cause the death of animals too
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat increases the risk of getting type 2 diabetes. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating More Meat is Linked to Higher Risk of Type 2
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Processed vegetarian protein options such as tofu can cause more greenhouse gas pollution than farming meat. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Farming meat can produce less pollution than companies that process vegetarian proteins like tofu.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Some vegetarian options cause more greenhouse gas emissions than meat production
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Processed vegetarian protein is less environmentally friendly than eating meat
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It is not necessary to become vegetarian to lower our environmental footprint. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There are ways other than giving up meat to help the environment.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: People do not have to stop eating meat to improve environmental conditions.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet conserves water. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: People can conserve water by becoming a vegetarian.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Becoming a vegetarian is healthy for the environment because people conserve more water.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Becoming vegetarian will not help alleviate world hunger. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: World hunger can not be fixed by vegetarianism. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There must be access to meats in order to alleviate world hunger. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets won't help world hunger
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarianism doesn't reduce world hunger
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Raising animals for food contributes to air and water pollution. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarians live longer. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It has been proven that Vegetarians Live Longer
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat provides a better source of iron than a vegetarian diet. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Iron from meat is often cited as better than vegetables.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: I think iron from meat eating is healthier than the vegetarian way.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Producing one hamburger destroys 55 square feet of rainforest. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Rainforests are destroyed to support animals used for food.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat is part of the cycle of life.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Raising animals for food is not cruel.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It is not cruel or wrong to raise animals to be eaten.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: There is nothing inherently cruel about raising animals for food
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Eating meat is not cruel or unethical; it is a natural part of the cycle of life. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Meat is the best source of vitamin B12, a vitamin necessary to nervous and digestive system health. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: It was proven the b12 from meat is helps the nervous and digestive system.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: For optimum nervous and digestive health, b12 from meat is ideal.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: If people became vegetarian, greenhouse gases would reduce. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet is better for the planet because it reduces greenhouse gases.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet delivers complete nutrition and can provide health benefits. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: In addition to health benefits, a vegetarian diet also gives you everything your body needs.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Complete nutrition and health benefits can be had with a vegetarian diet.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet promotes a healthy weight. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Healthy weight can be achieved with a vegetarian diet
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet contributes to a healthy weight
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A vegetarian diet helps build healthy bones because vegetarians absorb more calcium than meat eaters. 
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets allow more calcium to be absorbed than from meat and leads to healthy bones.
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Meat is the most convenient protein source available. 
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Meat is the most readily available protein.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Most find that meat is a very convenient source of protein.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective:  It will facilitate world food distribution
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Meat consumption should be reduced, but does NOT need to be eradicated
Output: support
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: A Vegan diet would not be practical in most parts of the world
Output: undermine
claim: A ‘wall’ on the shared USA and Mexico border would be ineffective.
 perspective: At the very least it slows people down
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: The Monarchy is backward and prejudiced
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: The Monarchy system is biased and inefficient.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Regressive and biased is how the Monarchy system is.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: The Monarchy contrasts the meaning of Democracy
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: It is costing the tax payers money which could be better spent
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Tax payers money could be spent more appropriately.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: The tax payers are the ones losing out on money that could be spent properly.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: tax payers money is valuable
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: tax payers money should be useful only to the public
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Monarchy is a child's creation
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Monarchy is just childish.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Monarchy is an infantile idea.
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: it is high time to scrap monarchy
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: monarchy in britain led to lots of chaos in the past
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Most other countries in Europe have abandoned the monarch
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: The head of state should be a position that is separate and distinct from politics
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Politics should not include the head of the state as in a monarchy.
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: There should be a separation from the head of state and politics.
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: There is no divine right to leadership or privilege
Output: support
claim: Britain should scrap the monarchy.
 perspective: Leadership and privilege are not divine rights.
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives for their work is an important form of economic empowerment.
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Being paid as a housewife is economically empowering
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paid housewives have a better economic power
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Payment and obligation works differently in public and in private.
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Payments would be more difficult to quantify in private transactions
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: It would be too inconvenient to make payments to housewives
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives is financially impractical.
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives would be inconvenient
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives would be difficult to achieve in the real world
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Housewives are entitled to pay
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Women who are housewives should be paid
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives reduces social mobility
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Housewives would lack incentives to find better paying, more fulfilling work
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives would give them less incentives to find better conditions
Output: undermine
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Paying housewives promotes more positive images of women and family life
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: When a housewife is paid, they have a better stand in society
Output: support
claim: Housewives should be paid for their work.
 perspective: Being paid as a housewife promotes more positive images
Output: support
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Fair use can be misused
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Fair use is prone to abuse.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Fair use isn't failsafe and can be used in direct contention against the original intent of the law.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Establishes a Clear Brightline in Favor of Data Freedom
Output: support
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Creates an easy to understand outline in support of Data Freedom.
Output: support
claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons.
 perspective: Provides the foundation which supports a rational set of ideas which foster an ideal in favor of Data Freedom.
Output: support
claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
 perspective: Expiring Tax Cuts Would Cause a Double Dip Recession
Output: undermine
claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
 perspective: double dip recessions are caused by expiring tax cuts
Output: undermine
claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
 perspective: to avoid a double dip recession do not let tax cuts expire
Output: undermine
claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
 perspective: Removing Tax Cuts Would Reduce the Deficit
Output: support
claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
 perspective: you can reduce the deficit by removing tax cuts
Output: support
claim: ‘The Spear’ should have remained on public display.
 perspective: Public Decency
Output: undermine
claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.
 perspective: the USA had every incentive to lie
Output: undermine
claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.
 perspective: There are problems with the pictures
Output: undermine
claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.
 perspective: there are issues with the pictures
Output: undermine
claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.
 perspective: The pictures have issues
Output: undermine
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Federal states are better able to protect their citizens.
Output: support
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Citizens are better protected in federal states.
Output: support
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Federal States often have persistent losers.
Output: undermine
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Losers abound in federal states.
Output: undermine
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Being a federal state helps large states deal with divergent economic performance
Output: support
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Federal United States are better off economically.
Output: support
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Federal governments often extend their powers and usurp local authority, especially if one or more federal units are disproportionately powerful.
Output: undermine
claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations.
 perspective: Federal states are economically stronger
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Cannabis is a gateway drug
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: using cannabis leads to other drugs
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: being involved with people who use cannabis exposes you to other drug use
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Uncertainty over the effects of cannabis means it is best to be prudent
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: before there is enough known about cannabis use it is wise to be careful
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Cannabis is harmful
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: cannabis makes you lazy
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: smoking cannabis keeps you from focusing
Output: undermine
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Cannabis opens the mind in a positive and beneficial manner
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: using cannabis has more benefits than not using
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: there are no negative side effects to the use of cannabis
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: If cannabis was legalized, it could be regulated
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: If legalized it can be monitored and taxed.
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Legal weed is subject to laws and is safer.
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs, yet remain legal.
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Other addictive substances are legal.
Output: support
claim: Cannabis should be legalised.
 perspective: Banning weed will lead to other bans.
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Higher taxes encourage tax avoidance
Output: undermine
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: One problematic outcome is that higher taxes trigger tax avoidance.
Output: undermine
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: The higher the taxes, the more often people will strive to dodge them. 
Output: undermine
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: 2.  No - it discourages incentive, increases dependence upon the government, and, if carried too far, impoverishes and oppresses people. 
Output: undermine
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Pays for common programs
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: With an increased standard of living for all the reason for crime would almost disappear.
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: People who enjoy a standard of living that allows them to be healthy and productive will decrease drug abuse.
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: balancing common deficits of the government for society 
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Balancing governmental deficits for common good of society
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Redistributing wealth to balance the inequality of income disparity
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: It is immoral that some have nothing and a few others are enormously wealthy.
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Everyone should have the resources to live a healthy, productive life.
Output: support
claim: High taxes are necessary for an effective state.
 perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity 
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: It currently promotes loyalty to the institution not the laity
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: Currently the Catholic Chuch focuses on loyalty to the church itself, not those they serve.
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: The Catholic Church wants loyalty to institution, not to the common man.
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: Catholicism has become too corporate
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: Clerical rape of children is, in part, due to the celibacy of priests and must change
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: If priests were not forced to be celibate, the issue of child rate would not be as widespread.
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: One of the reasons clerical child rape has happened is due to priests being forced to remain celibate.
Output: support
claim: The Catholic Church needs reform.
 perspective: Too much responsibility on the Pope
Output: support
claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
 perspective: Energy demands are increasing
Output: support
claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
 perspective: More nuclear plants are needed to deal with energy deficit concerns 
Output: support
claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
 perspective: Nuclear energy use makes very little difference to CO2 emissions
Output: support
claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
 perspective: Nuclear energy has no impact on carbon emissions 
Output: support
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: The Palestinian refugee crisis was created and is perpetuated by the Arab states and the Palestinians themselves
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: Palestinians have a right to return under international law
Output: support
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: The right to return is granted to Palestinians under international law.
Output: support
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: International law enables Palestinians to have the right to return.
Output: support
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: No real 'right of return' exists in international law
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: There really is no international law allowing for the right of return .
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: The international law of right of return is not a true law.
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: A Palestinian right of return would destroy the 'Jewish State' in Israel
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: The "Jewish State" in Israel would be destroyed if Palestinians were granted the right of return.
Output: undermine
claim: Israel should recognise the Palestinian right of return.
 perspective: In Israel, the "Jewish State" would be destroyed if there is a Palestinian right of return.
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should give up its EU rebate.
 perspective: The rebate should go in exchange for CAP reform
Output: support
claim: Britain should give up its EU rebate.
 perspective: CAP revision should be a priority trade-off for Britain's EU rebate
Output: support
claim: Britain should give up its EU rebate.
 perspective: The Rebate makes membership acceptable to the British people
Output: undermine
claim: Britain should give up its EU rebate.
 perspective: The Rebate is essential to preserve domestic support in Great Britain.
Output: undermine
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: The AU can bring peace to the continent
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: African Union is promoting peace in the African continent. 
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: Through the AU, there can be peace brought to the continent
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: One way to bring together the continent of Africa is though the AU
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: African international organisations do not have a history of effectiveness
Output: undermine
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: Integration will fix the problem of borders
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: Integration will mitigate the tension on border issues. 
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: Integration of Africa solves the border issues. 
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: Having integration would solve to border problem
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: There would be no more border issues if there was integration
Output: support
claim: The integration of Africa through the African Union can succeed.
 perspective: The role of leaders will prevent success
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: It is Men, Not Women, who are Disadvantaged in our Society
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Will Cause Resentment Between Men and Women
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Positive discrimination towards women should be allowed
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: It is right to treated women differently than men in some cases. 
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Due to physical difference between men and women, it's ok to have some positive discrimination towards women. 
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Parliament must be representative of our society and that requires a substantial increase in the number of women which only positive discrimination can achieve
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: If we want Parliament to be truly representative of our society, we must use positive discrimination to increase the number of female members
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Female role models are needed urgently to raise aspirations among young women and change parliamentary practices
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Female role models need to give hope to the desires of young women and change parliamentary practices.
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Female role models need to help young women achieve higher aspiration to change parliamentary practices.
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: In order to change parliamentary practices it is urgent to have female role models to raise aspirations among young women.
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Positive discrimination for women is discrimination
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: All-women shortlists or quotas restrict a constituent's freedom of choice
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Positive discrimination takes away voters' freedom of choice by limiting their choices to women
Output: undermine
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Women are vastly underrepresented in democratic legislatures across the world. Until 20 years ago women had never been more than 5% of MPs in UK Parliament. 
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: Until as recently as 20 years ago, no more than 5% of MPs in UK Parliament were female. Positive discrimination would increase that statistic
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: You have to treat people differently in order to reach equality
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates are more productive as members of society.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: An increase of graduates from college is beneficial to those in society who never attend college.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Many people succeed without college degrees.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Some argue that a college education may not be necessary, since there are many people who have succeeded despite not having college degrees. 
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: The question of whether or not a college education is necessary for success is one that is debated, as many successful people are not college educated.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Many college graduates are employed in jobs that do not require college degrees.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Many people with college degrees find themselves working in positions in which their degrees are not a requirement. 
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: More and more college educated people are accepting jobs for which they do not need a college education. 
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College exposes students to diverse people and ideas.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: One of the benefits of a college education is the exposure it provides to a multitude of people and ideas.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College exposes students to a wide  range of experiences and world perspectives.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates are more likely to have health insurance and retirement plans.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Those who graduate from college are more likely to have retirement plans and health insurance.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Graduating from college increases the likelihood of having health insurance and a retirement plan.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Colleges may be indoctrinating students instead of educating them.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Colleges may be brainwashing their students rather than helping them further their education.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: There are more students that are having their views and values shifted during college than in the past.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: The children of college graduates are healthier and more prepared for school.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates tend to have healthier, better educated offspring.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Children are typically healthier and more studious when their parents have graduated  college.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: More and more jobs require college degrees.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: A college degree is required for an increasing number of jobs.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: More jobs only hire those with college degrees.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Too many students earning degrees has diluted the value of a bachelor's degree.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: The value of a bachelor's degree has lessened.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: A bachelor's degree is considered standard now.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates have more and better employment opportunities.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Graduating from college increases employment opportunities.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: The variety and quality of employment opportunities increases for college graduates.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Earning a college degree is a major life achievement.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: A college education is a significant accomplishment.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: One of the most important things that one can achieve in their lifetime is a college education. 
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Young adults learn interpersonal skills in college.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College imparts interpersonal skills to students.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Graduating from college can keep poverty at bay.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates make more money.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates have lower poverty rates.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College graduates do better financially.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: People who graduate from college have more earning power.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: College education has a high return as an investment.
Output: support
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Gaining a college education is money well spent. 
Output: support