niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: We should BAN Alcohol for our families
Output: support
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: Banning alcohol would lead to healthier individuals. 
Output: support
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: Alcohol should be banned so that our individuals would lead healthier lives. 
Output: support
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: Banning Alcohol will improve health
Output: support
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: An alcohol ban would be good for society
Output: support
claim: Alcohol should be banned.
 perspective: Banning alcohol is a quick fix to a wider societal problem. 
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religious Doctrine Preaches Altruism
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: After looking the pros and cons we can conclude religion is a very positive force.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religion Does NOT Cause War.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religion Does Not Condone Destructive War
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: War does not occur due to religion.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religion does not promote violence.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religious organisations are by far the largest providers of charity in the world
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religious organisations provide the most charitable giving among anyone else worldwide.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: No one else gives or does more charitable work in the world than religious organisations.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religious ceremonies and organisations provide solace and celebration for the great changes in life such as birth, marriage and death, there is democratic support for this around the world
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religious events are a good place for people to celebrate various life milestones.
Output: support
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: People are able to celebrate various life events at religious gatherings and so there is democratic support for religion.
Output: support
claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
 perspective: Rejecting the Ban on Cluster Bombs Hurts the international image of the U.S.
Output: support
claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
 perspective: Cluster Bombs are too unreliable, so the U.S. should ban them.
Output: support
claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
 perspective: The U.S. should ban Cluster Bombs because they have no place in this world.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography liberates women
Output: undermine
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Porn is inherently dehumanising
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography dehumanizes its subject.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography inherently makes a person less human.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography eroticises violence
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography makes violence look sexy.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: The feminist movement should not allow women to sell themselves
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Feminists shouldn't allow women to sell their bodies for porn.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Selling one's body for porn is anti-feminist.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Attempting to ban it would only cause further problems
Output: undermine
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Only more problems would arise from the prohibition of pornography
Output: undermine
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography fuels unreachable ideals 
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography causes unreachable standards.
Output: support
claim: The feminist movement should seek a ban on pornography.
 perspective: Pornography gives people unrealistic ideas.
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Natural resources create employment
Output: undermine
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: One positive of natural resources is that it creates jobs.
Output: undermine
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Natural resources are of huge benefit for many reasons, one being the creation of work for the people. 
Output: undermine
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Resources are a source of conflict
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: The crux of the conflict comes down to the resources.
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Foreign companies gain most of the profits
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Foreign companies benefit most from the relationship.
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: The arrangement works to the disproportionate advantage of the foreign companies. 
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Bring Africa out of poverty 
Output: undermine
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Resource abundance has led to poor governance
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: An influx in resources has led to inefficient leaders
Output: support
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Richness in resources has caused our leaders to govern poorly
Output: support
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Inherited wealth can advance rich children in some professions and this can exclude poorer children.
Output: support
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Who decides how much is too much, and on what basis? 
Output: undermine
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Society can never ensure that all children start on an 'equal footing' and why would it want to?
Output: undermine
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Society would be damaged if people could not satisfy the procreative urge by enriching their children, as this would demotivate them.
Output: undermine
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Giving massive wealth to children would demotivate them and make them less productive for society.
Output: undermine
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Children who inherit riches are in a sense demotivated and as a result damaging towards society.
Output: undermine
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: An excess of wealth prevents spiritual growth
Output: support
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: The more money you have, the less spiritual you are.
Output: support
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Having too much money prevents you from growing spiritually.
Output: support
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: World economics would suffer
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: Is not worth the price
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: It is far too expensive.
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: The costs would be outrageous. 
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: To invade could trigger an Arms Race: the very thing everyone wants to avoid!
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: Everyone wants to avoid an Arms Race, and an invasion could trigger just that outcome. 
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: An Arms race is the one outcome everyone wants to avoid, and an invasion could lead to that. 
Output: undermine
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: North Korea is a threat to China in the future and a nuisance now.
Output: support
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: North Korea is both an annoyance now and a threat in the future to China.
Output: support
claim: The People’s Republic of China should invade North Korea.
 perspective: For China, North Korea is a current nuisance and a future threat. 
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Students will have to pay British tuition fees
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: No chance of changing from the Pound to the Euro
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: one point that is always not mentioned is the EU is part of the New World Order
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: British taxpayers are forced to bail out other European countries rather than receive goods and services
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: The UK would have a completely independent foreign policy
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: The UK can be independed 
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: The UK can have an independet foreign policy
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK will be disentangled from EU affairs
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK will be disentangled
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK will not be entangled
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Leaving the EU will mean the UK will have less regional influence
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK leaving the EU will shift its influences.
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: By leaving the EU, the UK would have less power in the region
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: The UK would lose their regional influence is they left the EU
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: The EU causes instability
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Leaving the EU means leaving the instability that was there
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Being involved with the EU causes instability
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: A nation state can only rely on itself for security
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK will renew its self-reliance in security.
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Security changes to arise when UK leaves EU.
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: A nation state has only themselves to look out for them
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: A nation state can only expect itself to be able to protect the people
Output: support
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Security is better shared
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: UK security strongest when shared with EU.
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Leaving EU would weaken UK security.
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Security is stronger when there are others involved
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: It is better protection when others are also sharing some of that responsibility 
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Leaving the EU would mean leaving their security services too
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: By leaving the EU, they would lose the security they had shared
Output: undermine
claim: The UK Should Leave the European Union.
 perspective: Leaving will mean less communication with other security services
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the federal minimum wage would disproportionately harm the poorest areas of the United States.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage only serves to hurt the unskilled, poor workers.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: By increasing the minimum wage, the poorest section of America is hurt more than any section is helped.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would help reduce the federal deficit.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would reduce the federal deficit.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would encourage companies to outsource jobs to countries where costs would be lower. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would force employers to find lower cost labor
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would hollow out companies through outsourcing to lower cost labor
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would disadvantage low-skilled workers. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Less educated workers will be at a disadvantage if the minimum wage is increased.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage does not help unskilled workers.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The minimum wage has not kept up with inflation.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Minimum wage has not kept pace with increases in inflation.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Inflation has increased at a faster pace than minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The cost of living has increased but minimum wage has stayed the same. 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Minimum wage needs to evolved with increasingly more expensive cost of living. 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Teenagers and young adults may be shut out of the workforce if the minimum wage is increased.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Teenagers and young adults won't be able to find employment, if minimum wage is increased.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Inexperienced and new workers will have a hard time finding employment.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising minimum wage will increase the cost the living.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Housing costs would only go up if the minimum wage is increased. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: If the minimum wage is increased, all Americans will be harmed because housing prices will go up.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would increase the price of consumer goods.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would increase housing costs. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would lead to a healthier population and prevent premature deaths.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: An higher minimum wage would lead to healthier people and less premature deaths.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would increase the health of the population and prevent premature deaths.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would increase school attendance and decrease high school drop-out rates.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would lead to less truancy and also lower drop out rates.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: A higher minimum wage would encourage people to attend school more and lead to lower drop out rates.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would reduce poverty.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: An increase in minimum wage would result in a decrease of households living in poverty.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Poverty can be decreased by raising the minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: If the minimum wage is increase, more people living in poverty would have more opportunity to attend university or trade school, increasing their chance and their children's chances of getting out of poverty.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would decrease high school enrollment rates and increase drop-out rates.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would price teens and other entry-level employees out of a job
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: A higher wage would result in lower benefits
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would reduce income inequality.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: A minimum wage increase would help to reduce race and gender inequality.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would increase economic activity and spur job growth.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Productivity and economic growth have increased at a faster rate than minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Minimum wage has not kept pace with improvements in productivity or economic growth.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The country is growing but minimum wage has not grown with it. 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Improvements in productivity and economic growth have outpaced increases in the minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would increase worker productivity and reduce employee turnover. 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: people won't quit jobs if they are paid enough
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: employers would actually save money by not having to train new workers 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Economica activity and job growth would be positively impacted by an increase in minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Economic activity and job growth would result from raising the minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: If minimum wage is increase so would the economy. The more money consumers have, the more consumers buy, thus also increasing the economy. 
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would reduce crime.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would result in less crime.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: A higher minimum wage means less crime.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would have a ripple effect, raising the incomes of people who make slightly above the minimum wage.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: raising minimum wage raises everyone's pay
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: A minimum wage increase would hurt businesses and force companies to close. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Businesses and companies won't be able to survive, if minimum wage is increased.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing minimum wage will have negative effect on the businesses.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The current minimum wage is not high enough to allow people to afford housing.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The current minimum wage is not high enough to allow people to afford everyday essentials.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: people cannot live off of their income
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: People who work for minimum wage cannot afford the things of everyday life.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: The currenit minimum wage is so low, you won't be able to afford everyday needs with it.
Output: support
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage would force businesses to lay off employees and raise unemployment levels.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising minimum wage will increase the unemployment level.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Businesses will be forced to lay of employees, if minimum wage is raised.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would decrease employee benefits and increase tax payments.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: When the minimum wage goes up, employers make up the costs by decreasing employee benefits and increasing general taxes. 
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Even if the minimum wage is increased, Americans will be hurt by a decrease in employee benefits and an increase in tax payments.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising the minimum wage would increase poverty.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Raising minimum wage will increase the poverty rate.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: If the minimum wage is increased, companies may use more robots and automated processes to replace service employees.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: Increasing the minimum wage will take away jobs from service employees.
Output: undermine
claim: The federal minimum wage should be increased.
 perspective: More companies will turn to automated robots if the minimum wage is increased.
Output: undermine
claim: Prioritize eliminating the budget deficit over increasing domestic spending.
 perspective: Paying off national debt via austerity measures would free-up money used for interest payments
Output: support
claim: Obesity is a disease.
 perspective: Obesity, like other diseases, impairs the normal functioning of the body.
Output: support
claim: Obesity is a disease.
 perspective: The body cannot function properly when one is obese.
Output: support
claim: Obesity is a disease.
 perspective: Obesity is a disease that results in suboptimal body functioning.
Output: support
claim: Obesity is a disease.
 perspective: Obesity can shut normal body functions. 
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Sex education damages the education system
Output: undermine
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Even religious and conservative communities will benefit from mandatory sex education
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Sexual development is a process of gradual discovery and cannot be effectively taught in a classroom
Output: undermine
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Parents cannot be guaranteed to provide a suitable amount of sex education
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Sex education provides “Immunization” against  sexually transmitted diseases and prevents unwanted pregnancy 
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Ignorance about sex is the primary cause of the spread of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs)
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Sex education leads to experimentation and early intercourse, and indirectly encourages promiscuity
Output: undermine
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Restricting information to children is inconsistent with the age of consent
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: The information age makes attempting to hide information on sex impossible
Output: support
claim: Make sex education mandatory in schools.
 perspective: Sex education for underage children undermines  the law
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Some groups of people have less capacity for suffering than most animals
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research is only used where other research methods are not suitable
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Research on animals is a last recourse, but it is still necessary at times.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Would send a positive social message, increasing animal welfare rights more generally in society
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Harming animals is a bad thing.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals shouldn't be put through harmful situations.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals are severely harmed by research done on them.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: When research is done on animals, it causes them severe harm.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals shouldn’t be harmed
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research causes severe harm to the animals involved
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research necessitates significant harm to the animals involved
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal testing significantly harms the animal used.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research is necessary for the development of truly novel substances
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Innovation often requires the use of animal research.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Science has been progressed through the use of animal research.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research ensures greater safety for humans
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Without animal research, we would have fewer products
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research has played a vital role in a great many of the major medical advances of the last century
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: There are no satisfactory alternatives to animal research
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal testing is cruel and inhumane.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Most animals that are used in scientific testing have better lives. 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Religious traditions allow for human dominion over animals.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. 
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Number 2 is a lie, there ARE alternatives to animal testing! Other companies use them, and animal testing doesnt prove anything, because although close, they arent people.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal tests may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal experiments retard medical progress due to providing misleading results
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: animal experiments are not always accurate
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: many companies get accurate results without testing on animals
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal testing dosen't ensure good results
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal tests are more expensive than alternative methods and are a waste of government research dollars.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals can suffer like humans do, so it is speciesism to experiment on them while we refrain from experimenting on humans.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Religious traditions tell us to be merciful to animals, so we should not cause them suffering by experimenting on them.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: People can suffer, but most animals can suffer more. 
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: While both people and animals both suffer, most animals suffer more than people do.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Most animals can suffer more than some people
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals often make better research subjects than human beings because of their shorter life cycles.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals are the only choice for testing. 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways. 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals don’t have human rights
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals don't have rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals do not have rights, therefore it is acceptable to experiment on them.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals' rights are of less moral worth than human rights
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Human's rights are a more important consideration than animal rights.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: When in conflict, the rights of humans must be preferred to the rights of animals.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Some cosmetics and health care products must be tested on animals to ensure their safety.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Medical breakthroughs involving animal research may still have been made without the use of animals.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Medical breakthroughs can be achieved without doing any scientific or commercial experiment on animals 
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act.
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal researchers treat animals humanely, both for the animals' sake and to ensure reliable test results.
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animals are treated well during animal testing. 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Research animals are well treated 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: We need to be able to test drugs on animals.  
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: We try to only use animal testing when it is needed.  
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Sometimes we have no other choices for Animal research, but then to do some animal testing. 
Output: undermine
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Animal research is only used when it’s needed
Output: undermine
claim: Aid Should Be Tied To Human Rights.
 perspective: Tying aid to human rights puts pressure on countries to act responsibly
Output: support
claim: Aid Should Be Tied To Human Rights.
 perspective: Government and citizens are often not the same entity.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Homosexuals would Change the Institution of Marriage for the Better
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Gay marriage would improve all marriages.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: EU Should Push Forward Equality for All of its Citizens Regardless of Sexuality
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: The EU should press for full equality regardless of sexuality.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: The EU should remove obstacles to equality in sexual preference.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Two people who want to get married should be able to, no matter their sexuality. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Homosexuals should have the same rights as straight people.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Heterosexuals shouldn't enjoy greater rights than homosexuals.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Same sex couple should have the same rights as heterosexual couples
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Gay people should have the same human rights as Heterosexuals
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Who says who can marry and who can't
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: All people have the right to marry.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Nature Suggests That Same Sex Marriage is Illogical
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: From a logical standpoint same sex marriage is illogical.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage often leads to an end to domestic partnership benefits for gay and straight couples, which disadvantages couples who choose not to get married. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: If gay couples don't get married it means they lose benefits through the legalization of gay marriage.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: The institution of marriage has been weakened in recent years and allowing gay marriage will only further damage an already crumbling institution.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Gay marriage will not be a positive boost to the institution of marriage.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Same-sex marriage is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Our constitution  is based on the idea that all people are equal and thus getting married is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: People have fought for civil rights and same sex marriage is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: State registrars conducting marriage ceremonies could not discriminate between homosexual and heterosexual couples
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: It is discriminatory to refuse gay couples the right to marry
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: gay should not be refused to marry
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Marriage is not something we should encourage or support.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage could lead down a "slippery slope," giving people in polygamous, incestuous, bestial, and other nontraditional relationships the right to marry. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: There are many types of marriage which are innaporpoate and dangerous which may be allowed if gay marriage is legalized. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage advances the "homosexual agenda" and unfairly paints opponents as bigots. 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Those against gay marriage are called names if gay marriage is legalized.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing marriage by gays leads to the oppression of those who are against the practice.
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man and one woman is historically inaccurate. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: The idea of a "traditional marriage" is a modern convention and has not remained static over the centuries. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: There is no historical basis for believing so called "traditional marriages" have been changeless over the centuries. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: There is much debate about gay marriage but many religious leaders are in support of it regardless. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Even though a vocal group of religious people disagrees with gay marriage, there is a growing number of religious leaders who support it and can back up their opinions with scripture. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Religion does not have power over marriage and it should not be limited to heterosexual marriage based on that religion. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: As a secular institution, marriage can not be limited to heterosexuals only based on religious ideals. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: If gay marriage is banned, there is likely to be increased rates of psychological disorders. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: We can reduce the prevalence of psychological disorders in the gay community by allowing gay marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Matrimony is a bond between man and woman only.
Output: undermine