niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
 perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.
Output: support
claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy.
 perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU.
Output: support
claim: Arming the police is a good idea.
 perspective: arming police will not help violence
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestuous, bestial and child marriages. 
Output: undermine
claim: The use of child performers should be banned.
 perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable
Output: support
claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU.
 perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy  EU membersh
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
 perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause.
Output: support
claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
 perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important.
Output: undermine
claim: Basic income tax should be abolished.
 perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods.
Output: support
claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned.
 perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools.
Output: undermine
claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons.
 perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
Output: support
claim: Global Warming is not an issue.
 perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing
Output: undermine
claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns.
 perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity
Output: support
claim: Voting should be compulsory in the UK.
 perspective: People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently.
Output: undermine
claim: We should expand NATO.
 perspective: NATO development was important  for international stability 
Output: support
claim: Forced marriage should be banned.
 perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters
Output: undermine
claim: The American Jobs Act should pass.
 perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
 perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters. 
Output: support
claim: Speed limits should be reduced.
 perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit 
Output: undermine
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. 
Output: support
claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
 perspective: It does not address the underlying issues
Output: undermine
claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
 perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs
Output: support
claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent.
 perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way.
Output: undermine
claim: The world should go vegan.
 perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet.
Output: support
claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay.
 perspective: Release is not the Solution
Output: undermine
claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal.
 perspective: Legalization has benefits for society
Output: support
claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons.
 perspective: countries have to right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapon
Output: undermine
claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections.
 perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote.
Output: support
claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply.
 perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to teach creationism in schools.
 perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else
Output: support
claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care.
 perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education.
Output: support
claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water.
 perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss.
Output: undermine
claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
 perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One
Output: support
claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
 perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs
Output: undermine
claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
 perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations.
Output: support
claim: Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country.
 perspective: Religion does not motivate foreign policy
Output: undermine
claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
 perspective: This House Believes That the U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs
Output: support
claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
 perspective: There are alternative methods of distributing the toys.
Output: undermine
claim: All nations should ban bullfighting.
 perspective: Bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal torture
Output: support
claim: Deny Organs to Non-Donors.
 perspective: People may have valid religious reasons not to donate organs
Output: undermine
claim: The UN should be reformed or replaced.
 perspective: The UN has performed a valuable service in preventing wars and in peacekeeping. 
Output: support
claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
 perspective: Tablets increase the number of excuses available for students not doing their schoolwork.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
 perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants.
 perspective: Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets.
Output: undermine
claim: Widen the East African Community.
 perspective: Conflicts and insecurity in the region will be resolved.
Output: support
claim: Ghana’s ban on smoking in public places is a model for Africa.
 perspective: It isn't necessary to ban smoking.
Output: undermine
claim: People should have a right to private education.
 perspective: Private schools are financially good for the state
Output: support
claim: permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports.
 perspective: Sports will become even more dangerous for athletes if they are allowed to take performance enhancing drugs. 
Output: undermine
claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
 perspective: Nuclear energy will not change carbon emissions in the atmosphere 
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The penalty of death is a crime deterrent.
Output: support
claim: You have nothing to worry about surveillance if you have done nothing wrong.
 perspective: Power trips can be had by agencies.
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The Coalition had a high probability of success
Output: support
claim: The United States should use the electoral college in presidential elections.
 perspective: With the electoral college in place, it weakens people's incentives for voting.
Output: undermine
claim:  College education is worth it.
 perspective: Attending college is a great way to network. 
Output: support
claim: social networking sites should be banned at the workplaces.
 perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential public health and safety information through their social media accounts.
Output: undermine
claim: Democracy Is the Best Form of Government.
 perspective: Promoting democracy promotes peace.
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: A proper marriage is between two heterosexual people of different genders.
Output: undermine
claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
 perspective: Conflict is centered around resources. 
Output: support
claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
 perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. 
Output: undermine
claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns.
 perspective: Negative campaigning creates voter apathy and prevents accurate reporting of candidates’ policies and ideologies.
Output: support
claim: The United States should maintain its embargo against Cuba.
 perspective: The embargo prevents the people of Cuba from joining the digital age by cutting them off from technology, and restricts the electronic flow of information to the island. 
Output: undermine
claim: The use of animals as objects of sport and entertainment should be banned.
 perspective: Using animals in sport demeans humans. 
Output: support
claim: Tennessee is correct to protect teachers who wish to explore the merits of creationism.
 perspective: Teachers shouldn't teach whatever they want.
Output: undermine
claim: The niqab and other face coverings in schools must be banned.
 perspective: It causes division within society
Output: support
claim: Sikh school pupils should be allowed to carry ceremonial daggers.
 perspective: It is a potential weapon.
Output: undermine
claim: Increased taxes are good for America.
 perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity 
Output: support
claim: Strict parenting works best.
 perspective: Kids deserve some freedom. 
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Making school uniforms mandatory creates a sense of equality since everyone will be wearing the same clothes.
Output: support
claim: Reality TV shows are an important part of popular culture today.
 perspective: Reality TV is disgusting.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
 perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man and one woman is historically inaccurate. 
Output: support
claim: Disclose previous convictions in court.
 perspective: Allowing this motion would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media facilitates political change.
Output: support
claim: We must negotiate with terrorists.
 perspective: Negotiations cannot take place while innocents are being threatened
Output: undermine
claim: We should be investing in public transport.
 perspective: it is the only way to stop our lazy nation from driving
Output: support
claim: Basic income tax should be abolished.
 perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control laws are needed in protecting women from domestic abusers and stalkers.
Output: support
claim: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech.
 perspective: Freedoms are not earned or deserved they are given to all people equally and no one should determine which agendas are too extreme to receive this protection.
Output: undermine
claim: Compensation should be paid for those who have had their culture appropriated.
 perspective: Compensation rights a wrong
Output: support
claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants.
 perspective: Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from secret drone strikes.
Output: undermine
claim: Homework is a waste of time.
 perspective: Too much homework can be harmful
Output: support
claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
 perspective: Lowering the age of consent will open the door to more criminal problems
Output: undermine
claim: School vouchers should be encouraged.
 perspective: School vouchers improve education in general by making public schools compete with private schools for students in a free market
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US' intentions were wrong.
Output: undermine
claim: Wikileaks is not and has never been a non-profit organization.
 perspective: Wikileaks is not accountable 
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: It is practically impossible to control people's movement
Output: undermine
claim: Wire-tapped and ‘intercepted’ evidence must be allowed as admissible in court.
 perspective: Intercepted evidence is a strong tool against widespread criminal networks.
Output: support
claim: Voting should become compulsory.
 perspective: What's the point of voting as politicians don't listen to the public anyways
Output: undermine
claim: Ban junk food from schools.
 perspective: Unhealthy foods lead to a higher risk of diabetes.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media has been found to be used for criminal activity.
Output: undermine
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Member states will reap the benefits of a federal Europe.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games have been shown to have positive effect on kindness and cooperative behavior.
Output: undermine
claim: Global Warming is not an issue.
 perspective: There are other things that cause the global warming situation.
Output: support
claim: The EU should significantly reduce the amount it spends on agricultural production subsidies.
 perspective: The market needs stability
Output: undermine
claim: Voting should be compulsory in the UK.
 perspective: There is precedent to compulsory voting working.
Output: support
claim: Scotland should cede from the union.
 perspective: Scotland's economy cannot survive if it doesn't have England to lean on.
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: It is the state’s duty to protect its community 
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: The state must keep it's community safe.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: The safety of the community is the state's priority.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Compulsory vaccination violates the individuals’ right to bodily integrity
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Individuals have the right to refuse vaccinations.
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: People's bodies are there own, and they have the right to refuse to be vaccinated.
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Compulsory vaccines are a financial relief on the health system  
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: The impacts of unvaccinated populations stain the financial resources of the healthcare system.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: A fully vaccinated population lesses the financial stress of the health system.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Duty to protect the child
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Children must be protected.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: It is the duty of the state to protect children.
Output: support
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: It is a parental right to decide about vaccinations for a child
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Parents have the right to make the decision about vaccinations for their children.
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: By making vaccinations mandatory, it takes away the rights of the parent.
Output: undermine
claim: Vaccination must be made compulsory.
 perspective: Vaccines have severe side effects 
Output: undermine
claim: Male infant circumcision is tantamount to child abuse.
 perspective: Parents have the right to use their best judgment, in the light of medical advice, as to what is in the best interest of their child 
Output: undermine
claim: Male infant circumcision is tantamount to child abuse.
 perspective: Parents know what best for thier child 
Output: undermine
claim: Male infant circumcision is tantamount to child abuse.
 perspective: Parents have the right to make the decisions for their child
Output: undermine
claim: School Day Should Be Extended.
 perspective: Lessons would feel less broken.
Output: support
claim: School Day Should Be Extended.
 perspective: Not enough fundng...
Output: undermine
claim: School Day Should Be Extended.
 perspective: So much easier for parents!
Output: support
claim: School Day Should Be Extended.
 perspective: Less need for homework.
Output: support
claim: School Day Should Be Extended.
 perspective: Time to finish activities
Output: support
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: It will cause less re-offenders.
Output: support
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: Adequate punishment reduces future offenses.
Output: support
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: Just punishment will lead to less criminals re-offending. 
Output: support
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: The onus should not be on punishing the criminal.
Output: undermine
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: Punishment should not be the primary focus.
Output: undermine
claim: punishment should fit the criminal.
 perspective: Our  main goal should not be punishing the criminal. 
Output: undermine
claim: A government has the obligation to lessen the economic gap between its rich and poor citizens.
 perspective: True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence
Output: support
claim: A government has the obligation to lessen the economic gap between its rich and poor citizens.
 perspective: The wealth gap does not allow for equality between the rich and the poor and so it should be reduced.
Output: support
claim: A government has the obligation to lessen the economic gap between its rich and poor citizens.
 perspective: Society gives an unfair advantage to certain groups of people and reducing the wealth gap will help achieve more equality.
Output: support
claim: A government has the obligation to lessen the economic gap between its rich and poor citizens.
 perspective: Wealth gap undermines equality of opportunity; reducing it makes society fairer.
Output: support
claim: A government has the obligation to lessen the economic gap between its rich and poor citizens.
 perspective: The Rich Poor Gap Silences the Political Voice of the Poor
Output: support
claim: We Should Question Authorities.
 perspective: Why is the authority figure there?
Output: support
claim: China should be allowed more control over its own seas.
 perspective: Sovereignty of the Seas
Output: support
claim: China should be allowed more control over its own seas.
 perspective: China should have freedom of the seas.
Output: support
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: Daesh and the Syrian civil war is nurture terrorism for export 
Output: support
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: There are other larger threats.
Output: undermine
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: More significant threats than the Islamic State exist for the west.
Output: undermine
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: The Islamic State is not the biggest concern for the western world.
Output: undermine
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: There are more important threats to focus on
Output: undermine
claim: Islamic State/Daesh is the most significant threat to the west.
 perspective: The west is insulated by distance from Daesh
Output: undermine
claim: All patents should be removed on anti-retroviral drugs to fight AIDS.
 perspective: Patents on ARVs prevent drug companies from collaborating in the search for a cure for AIDS
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: With more education comes more opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: More Education Brings More Opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The more education you have the more opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: More education brings more opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Opportunities are influenced by education
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The longer they are educated, the more opportunities they get
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Raising the school learning age promotes equal opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Raising the school leaving age promotes equal opportunities
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: There are cases where leaving school early is necessary
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Forced education achieves little
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Little is accomplished when education is forced.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Education that is forced does little.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Forced Education Achieves Little
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Not all skills are best learnt in a classroom environment.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Some skills are better learned outside the classroom.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The classroom environment is not ideal for all lessons.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society's future
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: A good investment in society would be to raise the school leaving age.
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Society's future depends on raising the school-leaving age.
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society’s future
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The economy of the future requires more education
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: In the future, the economy will rely on those with more education.
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The economy needs educated people in order to do well in the future.
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Society has a moral responsibility to educate all its young people
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Benefit from the increase in skills through their standard of living
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: The aging population and increasing retirement age requires higher skills
Output: support
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Young people should have the choice to decide for themselves
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Young people should have the freedom to make their own choices.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Young people should be able to think for themselves and make their own decisions.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Unrealistically costly
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Not everyone is good at studying
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Some people are unable to handle the rigor of university-level coursework.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: We shouldn't force people to study if they aren't good at it and choose not to.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: not everyone is good academically
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: some people are not good at studying
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Compulsory studying would be taking young people out of the workforce
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: Making university education compulsory would take young people out of the workforce.
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: some young people would be taken out of workforce by compulsory studying
Output: undermine
claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18.
 perspective: compulsory studying may remove young people from the workforce
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Small countries would be able to pursue their independence without having to rely on larger countries.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Disarmament would actually cause increased insecurity among nations, it is near impossible to guarantee that a nation has disarmed.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Small countries would no longer need the protection of larger ones, so could become more politically independent.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Disarmament would actually cause increased insecurity among nations, you can never really know for sure whether they have disarmed.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Disarmament would actually cause increased insecurity among nations, as there can never be any guarantee that a nation has disarmed
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Thus the super power model will be broken and small countries will be finally given the chance to have political independence without the need of protection from a ‘big brother’.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: All the people worldwide have the same rights and are equal to one another. 
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The pursuit of nuclear defence (respectively the possession of nuclear weapons) by more countries is a guarantee for peace. 
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Humanitarian intervention becomes impossible in states that possess nuclear weapons
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Humanitarian missions would not be possible in states that have nuclear weapons.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: It is very difficult to intercede in humanitarian crises in states wherein nuclear weapons are present.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The threat of a state developing nuclear weapons could instigate pre-emptive strikes from its neighbours and rivals to prevent the acquisition of such weapons
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Other countries could strike against those developing nuclear weapons to protect themselves.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: To keep other countries from obtaining a nuclear arsenal, other nations may pre-emptively strike.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The intention of a state to develop nuclear weapons may incite military attacks by enemies and by other supporting countries.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Public acknowledgement of the right to nuclear deterrence will benefit the public regulation of nuclear weapons generally
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Countries with nuclear weapons have the ability to set their own agenda.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: States with nuclear weapons are afforded more authority to set agendas at international levels.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: All states have a right to nuclear self-defense.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: To use  nuclear weapons in defense of the nation is lawful for all countries.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: countries have to right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapon
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: all countries are entitled to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they do not have the capacity to carry conventional weapons
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: It's conceivable that the wrong people will have the weapons.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The nukes can end up being used against us.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Terrorists will steal nuclear weapons from poorly guarded arsenals
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: [Iran specific] Iran has threatened to destroy Israel
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Iran has Israel targeted.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The United States has an obligation to protect international stability due to its unique military strength.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The US must protect the international community.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The US military is needed to ensure peace.
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: [Iran specific] Others, particularly Israel, would act if the United States did not
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: If the US does not act on Iran, Israel will
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons  
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons
Output: support
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: States will give terrorists nuclear weapons
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous
Output: undermine
claim: All countries should have the right to pursue a nuclear defence.
 perspective: It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Too many innocents killed
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Many innocents have been killed because of the death penalty.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty has led to innocent people dying.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Can be reserved for the worst of the worst
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty should be used for the worst cases.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty is saved for the most horrible criminals.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Necessary for punitive justice
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty should be used if someone commits first-degree murder.   They would receive the same treatment that they gave.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty should apply as punishment for first-degree murder; an eye for an eye.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Killers must die to satisfy society
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective:  There are more efficient policies than death penalty
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Other policies are more efficient than using the death penalty.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty is not an efficient policy.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: we are increasing the hate inside terrorist organizations and the dead person will be seen as a hero that animates their fight. 
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: It is dangerous to impose the death penalty because the dead person would be seen as a hero to their terrorist organization.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty for terrorists causes their organizations to hate more and to idolize their dead.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Execution helps alleviate the overcrowding of prisons.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: We could make more room in the prison with execution punishment.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The solution to the overcrowding in prisons is execution.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty is too absolute and too irreversible.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty is not justice.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty is a financial burden on the state.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The expense of the death penalty financial hardship on the state.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: It's a financial loss to the state enforcing the death penalty.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Crime can be prevented by threatening the death penalty.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: With the death penalty in place, crime is deterred
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The death penalty deters crime.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: Execution prevents the accused from committing further crimes.
Output: support
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: State-sanctioned killing is wrong.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: It's wrong to have the state enforce killing.
Output: undermine
claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
 perspective: The sanctioning of the State to kill is just immoral.
Output: undermine
claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
 perspective: Unmanned salons are legal, yet deadly
Output: support
claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
 perspective: Unmanned salons are deadly
Output: support
claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
 perspective: Unmanned salons are very deadly
Output: support
claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
 perspective: Unmanned salons, while legal, are also deadly
Output: support
claim: Sunbeds should be banned.
 perspective: Unmanned salons may be legal, but they also may be deadly
Output: support
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Decreased Conflict and the end of the mercenary age
Output: support
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: The end of the mercenary age is related to decreased conflict.
Output: support
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Mercenaries are still hired by NGOs 
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: NGOs still hire mercenaries.
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: There is still a place for mercenaries working for NGOs.
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Mercenaries still have a presence in coups
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Mercenaries are still often involved in political coups.
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Mercenaries can still be found in coups.
Output: undermine
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Legislation against mercenaries 
Output: support
claim: The prevalence of ‘African mercenaries’ is decreasing.
 perspective: Laws are being passed against mercenaries.
Output: support
claim: We must use Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to strike terrorist targets.
 perspective: Using drones blurs the distinction between war and peace.
Output: undermine
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museums preserve and display our heritage and therefore should be accessible to all of the public free of charge
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Since museums essentially maintain our collective histories, there should be free access to all citizens.
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museums exist as an archive of our shared experiences and history, and as such, should grant access to all without charge. 
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: State funding should be used elsewhere
Output: undermine
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Funding for museums is wasteful
Output: undermine
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: We should not expect the state to fund museums
Output: undermine
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museums are a crucial source of inspiration and education
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museums are a necessary part of a society's understanding of culture and edification.
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museums are critical to the motivations as well as the education of a society as a whole. 
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Museum charges can be offset by government funding
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: Free museums encourage attendance
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: People are more likely to attend museums if they are free. 
Output: support
claim: Make all museums free of charge.
 perspective: If state-funded, there is little incentive to increase numbers of visitors
Output: undermine
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess lacks the necessary physical activity
Output: undermine
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Olympic sports are suppose to be physical
Output: undermine
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Mind sports are some of the world's oldest and most contested competitive sports.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Mind sports have been around for centuries and are competitive.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Mind sports is the oldest and most highly competitive sports.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess ought to qualify as an Olympic sport
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: It would be appropriate for Chess to become an Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess is currently not an Olympic sport, but it should be.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: chess should be included in the list of Olympic sport
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Opening up the Olympics for borderline sports is bad in itself
Output: undermine
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess is highly popular and should be represented
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess is popular worldwide and should be an Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: The popularity of Chess worldwide sets it up as an appropriate Olympic sport.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess is one of the popular sport that should be represented at the Olympic.
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Introducing chess would preserve the spirit of the ancient Olympic Games
Output: support
claim: Mind Sports Such as Chess, Quizzing and Debating Should Be Olympic Sports.
 perspective: Chess cannot ensure fair play
Output: undermine
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity allows people to speak the truth without fearing harm to their careers
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity encourages honesty.
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Internet anonymity enables citizens to exercise their right to free speech
Output: support
claim: The right to anonymous posting on the internet should be protected by law.
 perspective: Anonymity online allows for free speech.
Output: support