niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers have a reputation to uphold.
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: People no longer consume media in a linear way, people prefer to pick and choose what news they consume
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers cannot be environmentally sustained.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are over-consumers of paper products which results in loss of woodland habitats.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers use valuable resources in production whereby the internet does not.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: In the internet age immediacy is everything, newspapers can often contain out of date information by the time they hit the shelves.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are too slow to keep up with the flow of news.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Immediately the internet picks up news and the newspaper has to wait for the next publication to report it.
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: The balance of analysis and relevancy is better struck by newspapers
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: The government has a right to make decisions in the best interest of the people
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: It is government's responsibility to work for the betterment of the people
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: The government must make decisions about what is best for the people
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: The movement of people cannot practically be controlled
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: Rural life is miserable and has higher mortality rates than cities
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: Despite increased mortality and a depressing lifestyle, rural-urban migration must be controlled to prevent rapid urbanisation and disruption of the economy
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the cities economically and socially
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: City-dwellers are best off economically and socially when emigration to cities is restricted
Output: support
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: Restrictions cause an incredible loss of potential
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: The governments of developing nations want to impose restrictions to control rural-urban migration, but these restrictions can shut out significant potential for improved quality of life for many rural citizens living in poverty
Output: undermine
claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration.
 perspective: If developing nations place restrictions on rural-urban migration, the potential for poor rural citizens to improve their quality of life will be lost in these regulations. 
Output: undermine
claim: Jerusalem should be divided.
 perspective: International law supports dividing Jerusalem
Output: support
claim: Jerusalem should be divided.
 perspective: Dividing Jerusalem would harm Israeli society: 
Output: undermine
claim: Jerusalem should be divided.
 perspective: Division would do more harm than good.
Output: undermine
claim: Jerusalem should be divided.
 perspective: Unfavorable societal outcomes from division mean that it is not worth it.
Output: undermine
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Foreign aid benefits the United States
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: The United States has much to gain from giving Foreign Aid.
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Foreign aid is something that benefits the United States if it engages in it.
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Aid benefits National Security
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: One of the benefits of Foreign Aid is that it also improves National Security.
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: To improve National Security, the US should engage more often in Foreign Aid.
Output: support
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Violation of Sovereignty 
Output: undermine
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Aiding foreign journalists in the evasion of censorship is a violation of sovereignty.
Output: undermine
claim: Should the United States increase the foreign aid budget?.
 perspective: Concealing online activities undermines a sovereign government.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can lead to stress and offline relationship problems.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites often lead to relationship problems and other stress in real life.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media has been linked to stress and problems in personal relationships in the real world.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: "Crowdsourcing" and "crowdfunding" on social media allows people to collectively accomplish a goal.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: People can come together to accomplish a goal through "crowdsourcing" and "crowdfunding" on social media websites.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: "Crowdsourcing" and "crowdfunding" via social media, allows people to assist in a worthy cause.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Much time can be wasted on social networking sites.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social networking sites are a massive time drain.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can entice people to waste time.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media tends to have people getting too immersed in it.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Employees should not waste time on social networking sites. 
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Using social networking sites at workplaces wastes valuable amount of work-time. 
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Soicial Networking Sites are a Time-Waster
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Using social media can harm students' chances for college admission.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media use can harm students' chances to be admitted to colleges
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can damage students' chances of admission to colleges
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows for quick, easy dissemination of public health and safety information from reputable sources.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Health and safety officers can quickly and easily provide important information to the public when needed.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential public health and safety information through their social media accounts.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Children may endanger themselves by not understanding the public and viral nature of social media.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: There are many people who are endangering their future with social media.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites help students do better at school.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Using social media can improve students grades
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: students grades have gone up from social media
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Students do better using social media sites.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media offers students a chance to do better in school.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media spreads information faster than any other media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows people to improve their relationships and make new friends.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: social media help people find friends
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: people who may not have many friends can use social media to get more
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: People can improve relationships and make new friends with social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Making new friends and improving relationships is a perk of social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites' advertising practices may constitute an invasion of privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites' advertising practices might invade peoples' privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites can have advertising practices that are an invasion to privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helps empower business women.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: business women can improve their life by social media
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Business women are empowered through social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows business women to flourish.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can endanger the military, journalists, and activists.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can bring harm to groups such as the military, journalists and activists.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: There is a danger that social media can bring to the military, journalists and activists.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can facilitate inappropriate student-teacher relationships.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can cause inappropriate student-teacher relations.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can start inappropriate student-teacher problems.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites help employers find employees and job-seekers find work.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: When looking for a job social media can help
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: employers can search social media for new empolyees
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Job-seekers may find work with social media sites.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helps job-seekers connect with employers
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can help disarm social stigmas.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can help alleviate the shunning of the socially marginalized.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can be a tool in the fight against social discrimination.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows for rapid communication during crisis events.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media facilitates quick and easy contact during times of crisis.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media is useful in times of emergencies as it enables instant contact.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Unauthorized sharing on social media exposes artists to copyright infringement, loss of intellectual property, and loss of income.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Sharing on social media without permission can expose artists to copyright infringement, loss of intellectual property, and income loss
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Unauthorized sharing on social media sites can lead to artists being infringed on their copyrights, loss of intellectual property, and income loss
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helps people who are socially isolated or shy connect with other people.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Those who are more shy and introverted can connect with others through social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: A bashful individual can fulfill his or her social needs through social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media increases voter participation.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Getting the word out about how to vote on social media gives more people the chance to participate. 
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helped to motivate people to get out and vote. 
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media is good for the economy.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: If you need a local part-time job than post it to social media.  
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helps small businesses find talented workers.  
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media offers teachers a platform for collaboration with other teachers and communication with students outside the classroom.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Teachers are able to collaborate with one another using social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media harms employees' productivity.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Employees are constantly losing their focus due to social media.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media posts cannot be completely deleted and all information posted can have unintended consequences.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media posts can't be deleted permanently and the information that is posted can have unintended consequences.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media posts are not able to be completely deleted and all the information that was posted can have unintended consequences.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: It is easy to act in an inappropriate manner with electronic communications.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Electronic communication facilitates sexual misconduct. 
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media enables "sexting," which can lead to criminal charges and the unexpected proliferation of personal images.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Many young people talk sexually through social media.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: If you are not careful, sexting can be a start of criminal activity.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media helps senior citizens feel more connected to society.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: The elderly do not feel alienated from society when they are on social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Being active on social media, helps seniors feel more involved in society at large.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media lacks privacy and exposes users to government and corporate intrusions.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: A potential drawback of social media on societies is that it opens users up to privacy invasions by government and private entities.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media enables government and business interests to invade the privacy of its users.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media enables the spread of unreliable and false information.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows for the rapid dissemination of untrue data.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: One drawback of social media is that it quickly facilitates the spread of rumors and falsities. 
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media causes people to spend less time interacting face-to-face.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: When people use social media they tend to reduce their personal face-to-face  time with others.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Using social media takes time away from real, in-person interaction.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media offers a way for musicians and artists to build audiences even if they don't have a corporate contract.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Those in the arts can increase their audience using social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: More educational resources can be made available through social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media provides academic research to a wider audience, allowing many people access to previously unavailable educational resources.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can be powerful educational resources. 
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social medica can act as an educational tool.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media facilitates cyberbullying.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Many people use social media to bully people.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media enables people to bully others online.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Being a part of a social media site can increase a person's quality of life and reduce the risk of health problems.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can help a person connect with people to alleviate depression. 
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective:  Social media is good for people who want to interact, but have social anxiety in person.  
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Students who are heavy social media users tend to have lower grades.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Among students, heavy social media usage is correlated with lower grades. 
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows people from around the USA to gather together to discuss political ideas and make change.  
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites empower individuals to make social change and do social good on a community level.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media sites have helped people raise money for medical procedures.  
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: The use of social media is correlated with personality and brain disorders.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: There are some personality and brain disorders that appear to connect to social media usage.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Corporations and small businesses use social media to benefit themselves and consumers.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media is beneficial to corporations and businesses.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Colleges and universities use social media to recruit and retain students.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Students can be recruited to universities through social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media is often used by higher education to find new students.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Law enforcement uses social media to catch and prosecute criminals.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media can help prosecute criminals
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media allows law enforcement to catch and prosecute criminals.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Criminals can be caught using social media.
Output: support
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Social media aids the spread of hate groups.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Hate groups use social media to get their message out there.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Many individuals report to have seen some groups of hate using social media.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Criminals use social media to commit and promote crimes.
Output: undermine
claim: Social networking sites are good for our society.
 perspective: Criminals can use social media to commit crimes.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students can express their individuality in school uniforms by introducing variations and adding accessories.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms restrict students' freedom of expression.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Personality and Expressing yourself
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms promote conformity over individuality.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Creates a sense of equality
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Wearing uniforms enhances school pride, unity, and community spirit.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: It contributes to the sense of school's unity
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Uniforms make everyone appear equal since there is no variation in clothing styles, costs, etc.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: makes a sense of equality
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms keep students focused on their education, not their clothes.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms emphasize the socio-economic divisions they are supposed to eliminate. 
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms make getting ready for school easier, which can improve punctuality.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms may improve attendance and discipline.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students oppose school uniforms.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students stand against school uniforms.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students don't want school uniforms.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms may delay the transition into adulthood.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Parents should be free to choose their children's clothes without government interference.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Parents have a right to dress their children.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: The government shouldn't dictate children's clothing to parents.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Focusing on uniforms takes attention away from finding genuine solutions to problems in education. 
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Most parents and educators support mandatory school uniforms.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: The push for school uniforms is driven by commercial interests rather than educational ones.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms can save parents money.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Uniforms make it easier for parents to afford clothes for their kids.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Uniform policies save valuable class time because they are easier to enforce than a standard dress code.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Time can be better devoted to class and teaching when uniforms are implemented because it avoids dress code issues.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Uniforms may have a detrimental effect on students' self-image.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms in public schools undermine the promise of a free education by imposing an extra expense on families.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms undermine access to education by imposing expenses.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms create a level playing field among students, reducing peer pressure and bullying.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms do not stop bullying and may increase violent attacks.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: The key findings used to tout the benefits of uniforms are questionable.
Output: undermine
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students dressed in uniform are better perceived by teachers and peers.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students are more respected when they wear uniforms.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Students' legal right to free expression remains intact even with mandatory school uniforms.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: Student's rights are not violated when wearing uniforms.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms may deter crime and increase student safety.
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms prevent the display of gang colors and insignia. 
Output: support
claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
 perspective: School uniforms do not improve attendance, academic preparedness, or exam results.
Output: undermine
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: DNA testing is fallible, and therefore should not be used as the basis of convictions
Output: undermine
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: DNA testing isn't 100% accurate, so it shouldn't be used to convict people.
Output: undermine
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: People shouldn't be convicted based on DNA evidence because it's not always accurate.
Output: undermine
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: DNA evidence would reduce the risk of wrongful conviction
Output: support
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: Wrongful convictions can be reduced through DNA evidence.
Output: support
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: DNA evidence can lower the chance that a wrongful conviction happens.
Output: support
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: A DNA database would reduce the time spent tracking down suspects
Output: support
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: Time spent tracking down suspects can be reduced with a database of DNA.
Output: support
claim: We must have a criminal DNA database.
 perspective: Creating a database for DNA can help expedite the process of tracking down suspects.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertising helps us choose between different goods.
Output: undermine
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertisements try to make people feel bad about not having the product
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertising reduces consumers self-esteem.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertisements are an attempt to brainwash customers.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Ads can sway customers uneccassarily one way or the other.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Ads can be immoral and need to be limited.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: There are too many advertisements in everyday life.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: There are too many ads everywhere you look.
Output: support
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertisements promote healthy products and lifestyles.
Output: undermine
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertising is a powerful medium to communicated about healthy lifestyles.
Output: undermine
claim: Advertising is harmful.
 perspective: Advertisements tell children that they should have everything they want.
Output: support
claim: Alternative medicine poses a threat to public health.
 perspective: Many alternative remedies, such as homeopathy, offer nothing but a false hope and can discourage patients from consulting a doctor with what may be serious symptoms
Output: support
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: The term "endangered" is inconsistently applied
Output: undermine
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: Protecting endangered species protects the interests of humans
Output: support
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: The interests of humans are protected when endangered species are protected.
Output: support
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: Endangered species protection also protects  the interests of humans.
Output: support
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: Human rights trump those of lower animals
Output: undermine
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: Human rights are more important that the rights of lower animals.
Output: undermine
claim: Endangered species should be protected.
 perspective: The rights of lower animals are trumped by the rights of humans.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: The International Olympic Committee considers golf a sport. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf involves competition, keeping score, and declaring a winner, but those qualities alone do not make it a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf involves many elements of competition, but that does not make it a sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Sports experts agree that golf lacks the athletic rigor needed to be a real sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Experts believe golf does not require enough physical fitness to be considered a sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: If you can compete in a professional tournament with a broken leg, it is not a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf does not have the physical rigors that sports do.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is not physically demanding enough to be a sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Even people with broken limbs can play golf, which makes it not a real sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: If an activity does not make you break a sweat, or if it can be done while drinking and smoking, then it is not a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Because you can play golf without breaking a sweat, and drink and smoke while doing it,  it is not a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is not a sport because you can play it without breaking a sweat and while you are drunk. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: The fact that golf can be difficult and requires practice and skill to achieve proficiency does not mean it qualifies as a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: That golf can be difficult and skills and practice are required does not qualify it as a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Skill is required for a person to be proficient in golf doesn't make it a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: The possibility of getting injured while playing golf does not make it a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: the probability of getting injured while playing golf is extremely low therefore it is not a sport.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: There should be some risk to be considered a real sport, which golf does not have.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Sports agents, sponsors, and sporting goods manufacturers consider golf to be a sport. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: The decision to include golf in the 2016 Summer Olympics is questionable. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Professional golfers are considered athletes by mainstream media. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Athleticism does not correlate with performance when it comes to golf. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Even if you are really athletic does not mean you will do well at golf.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: You do not need to be physically fit to be good at golf.
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf better matches the definition of a game than a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: The definition of a game is a better match to golf than the definition of a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is the match to a game more than a match to a sport. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf meets the definition of the word "sport" found in many dictionaries. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is categorized as a sport according the definitions found in many dictionaries
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is one of dozens of independent sports like running or swimming. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf has many more commonalities with other sports. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: There are many commonalities between golf and other sports. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Contrary to public opinion golf does have a lot more commonalities with other sports than most realize. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: College and university athletic departments classify golf as a sport. 
Output: support
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Unlike a sport, golf does not require rigorous physical activity. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: You are not required to endure rigorous physical activity to play golf. 
Output: undermine
claim: Golf is a Sport.
 perspective: Golf is unlike sports in which rigorous physical activities are required. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage often leads to an end to domestic partnership benefits for gay and straight couples, which disadvantages couples who choose not to get married. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: If gay couples don't get married it means they lose benefits through the legalization of gay marriage.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The institution of marriage has been weakened in recent years and allowing gay marriage will only further damage an already crumbling institution.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Gay marriage will not be a positive boost to the institution of marriage.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Same-sex marriage is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Our constitution  is based on the idea that all people are equal and thus getting married is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: People have fought for civil rights and same sex marriage is a civil right. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Marriage is not something we should encourage or support.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage could lead down a "slippery slope," giving people in polygamous, incestuous, bestial, and other nontraditional relationships the right to marry. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: There are many types of marriage which are innaporpoate and dangerous which may be allowed if gay marriage is legalized. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestuous, bestial and child marriages. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage advances the "homosexual agenda" and unfairly paints opponents as bigots. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Those against gay marriage are called names if gay marriage is legalized.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing marriage by gays leads to the oppression of those who are against the practice.
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Gay marriage is protected by the US Constitution's commitments to liberty and equality. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man and one woman is historically inaccurate. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The idea of a "traditional marriage" is a modern convention and has not remained static over the centuries. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: There is no historical basis for believing so called "traditional marriages" have been changeless over the centuries. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: There is much debate about gay marriage but many religious leaders are in support of it regardless. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Even though a vocal group of religious people disagrees with gay marriage, there is a growing number of religious leaders who support it and can back up their opinions with scripture. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Religion does not have power over marriage and it should not be limited to heterosexual marriage based on that religion. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: As a secular institution, marriage can not be limited to heterosexuals only based on religious ideals. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: If gay marriage is banned, there is likely to be increased rates of psychological disorders. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: We can reduce the prevalence of psychological disorders in the gay community by allowing gay marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: God condemns gay marriage in the Bible and it is not supported by a lot of churches. 
Output: undermine
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Same sex couple should have the same rights as heterosexual couples
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Who says who can marry and who can't
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: All people have the right to marry.
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The institution of marriage cannot be harmed by giving more people the freedom to marry and it may become the case that heterosexual marriage is less stable than same-sex marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Same-Sex marriages should have the same legal protections as regular marriages.
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Gay marriages can bring financial gain to federal, state, and local governments and can help boost the economy. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: The economy of states can be boosted by allowing same-sex marriages. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Two people who want to get married should be able to, no matter their sexuality. 
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Homosexuals should have the same rights as straight people.
Output: support
claim: Gay marriage should be legal.
 perspective: Heterosexuals shouldn't enjoy greater rights than homosexuals.
Output: support