niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: Climate Change is the end of the world.
 perspective: The significant bulk of scientific research says it is happening
Output: support
claim: Climate Change is the end of the world.
 perspective: climate change theory is supported by physical data
Output: support
claim: Climate Change is the end of the world.
 perspective: climate change can be currently oberved in real time data
Output: support
claim: Student loan debt should be easier to discharge in bankruptcy.
 perspective: Student loan discharge would incite colleges to raise tuition
Output: undermine
claim: PHILOSOPHY – Utilitarianism isn’t as fair as it initially seems.
 perspective: INDIVIDUAL HEDONISM NOT ALWAYS POSITIVE FOR SOCIETY/INDIVIDUALS THEMSELVES.
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: The concept of federalism lacks political support
Output: undermine
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: The federal model has proved to be a success previously
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Previous federal models have proven to be successful
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: A federal Europe will protect the cultural diversity of its member states
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Protection of cultural diversity is one benefit of a federal Europe.
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Existing contributive inequalities within the Union would be amplified by a formal federal system
Output: undermine
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Formal federalism creates extra inequalities.
Output: undermine
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: A federal Europe will benefit the citizens of its member states
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Citizens will benefit from a federal Europe.
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: A federal Europe will be a stronger international actor
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Europe is stronger if federal.
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: If Europe went federal, they would have a larger international impact
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: A federal Europe will ensure that large, multinational businesses remain accountable for their actions
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Federalism holds massive corporations accountable.
Output: support
claim: Europe should be federal.
 perspective: Moves toward federalism will endanger the stability of the EU
Output: undermine
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: An African voice would change priorities for the better
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: an african voice would give another point of view
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: Giving Africa a voice would improve priority
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: Having an African voice would make sure that their priorities are in order
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: More vetoes mean less action
Output: undermine
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: it is easy to do nothing and veto with no african voice in the mix.
Output: undermine
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: If we give too many countries the ability to veto, then less will get done.
Output: undermine
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: Proportionality
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: The UNSC mostly deals with Africa
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: The UNSC already deals a lot with Africa anyway
Output: support
claim: A permanent UNSC seat with veto power must be reserved to an African country.
 perspective: The UNSC already has a heavy influence in Africa
Output: support
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: Invoking public reaction can damage the lives of those concerned in the court case.
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: This turns court cases into entertainment, rather than legitimate legal proceedings.
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: The legitimacy of the legal proceedings is compromised and becomes just entertainment.
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: People are entertained and the legal proceedings lose their legitimacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: this will turn a court case into a circus
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: court cases will be turned into circuses 
Output: undermine
claim: Place Cameras in Courtrooms to Televise Court Cases.
 perspective: Witnesses and jurors could easily become involved in the media coverage of the case and place the trial at jeopardy.
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: The Right To Express Ones Self
Output: support
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: Freedom of expression is a right.
Output: support
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: Freedom of expression is a basic right.
Output: support
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: Not everyone is able to make informed decisions
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: Everyone is not equally equipped to make good decisions.
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: Informed decision making is not guaranteed.
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: It can be selfish
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: It can be inconsiderate to others.
Output: undermine
claim: People should be allowed to do what they want to their own bodies.
 perspective: It is self absorbed.
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: Going left is step back not a step forward
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: Labour would be foolish to move to the left.
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: A poor decision for Labour would be a move to the left.
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: Going left would actually be a step backward
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: If they went left, it would be a step back and not a step forward
Output: undermine
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: Presents a bold new path
Output: support
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: Shifting to the left is a strong move by Labour.
Output: support
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: An aggressive move by Labour would be to the left.
Output: support
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: It would present a bold new path for them
Output: support
claim: A move to the left is good for Labour.
 perspective: It would show that they are on a new path
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: The punishment for failing to follow the rules would infringe on women's right to control their own bodies. 
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Punishing someone for not sticking to the rule can be seen as violating a women's rights
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Trying to enforce this rule would mean that women's rights are infringed upon
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: 1 child policy can infringe on women's rights.
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Universal world policies can infringe on rights.
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Overpopulation poses environmental hazards 
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: The environment is worsened by overpopulation.
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Overpopulation is threatening to the environment.
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Exerts a preference for conventional families 
Output: undermine
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Personal responsibility would improve in general 
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: There would be fewer unwanted children in the world 
Output: support
claim: 1-child policy for every single country in the world!.
 perspective: Less unwanted children would be around.
Output: support
claim: Paparazzi and press intrude too much into celebrities lives.
 perspective: A celebrities job is to entertain, when did watching a real life marriage fall apart or a real life person in depression become entertaining?
Output: support
claim: Paparazzi and press intrude too much into celebrities lives.
 perspective: Addiction to celebrity culture and information is unhealthy
Output: support
claim: Paparazzi and press intrude too much into celebrities lives.
 perspective: Everyone deserves a right to privacy
Output: support
claim: Paparazzi and press intrude too much into celebrities lives.
 perspective: Public figures have a responsibility to be role models
Output: undermine
claim: Paparazzi and press intrude too much into celebrities lives.
 perspective: In the case of paparazzi lives are put at risk
Output: support
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: Would be very hard to maintain
Output: undermine
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: Could lead to vigilante attacks
Output: undermine
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: This could cause Parents to take matters into their own hands.
Output: undermine
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: Vigilante attacks can possible happen because of that.
Output: undermine
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.
Output: support
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: Children should not be exposed to inappropriate topics like sex, violence, or drug use in school or public libraries.
Output: support
claim: Parents should have the right to do background checks on those looking after their children.
 perspective: School and public libraries should not expose children to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics. 
Output: support
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: The internet is a public space.
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Only Criminals benefit from internet Privacy
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Internet privacy only helps criminals.
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Only wrong-doers benefit from internet privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Online privacy only benefits those who commit crimes on the internet.
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Criminals will be the only group benefited by online privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: It Protects Those Vulnerable to Exploitation
Output: support
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: People vulnerable to explotation are protected.
Output: support
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Those who might be exploited are protected. 
Output: support
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Privacy on the internet is important for protecting users from being exploited.
Output: support
claim: Privacy Online is Important.
 perspective: Users online would be unprotected from exploitation if it weren't for online privacy.
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: Only a more representative United Nations Security Council is legitimate.
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The UNSC is legitimate only if it has the best representation
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The UNSC will only be seen as legitimate if it is representative
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The EU now has the necessary foreign policy organs.
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: France and Britain should be willing to give up their seats for the European Union.
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The only way the United Nations Security Council can be reformed is through expansion.
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The United States Security Council should expand
Output: support
claim: Grant the EU a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
 perspective: The US Security Counsel neds to expand
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Maintaining a system of free university education leads to an inefficient allocation of state resources. 
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: State resources could be better used in areas other than supporting free university education
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Maintaining methods of free university education takes away resources from programs that are more useful to the population
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The fees and loans create a substantial burden on our young adults.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The burden of fees and loans are too great to expect young people to shoulder 
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Young people are too burdened by fees and loans.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The cost of fees and loans are to substantial for younger people to handle.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The cost to the state is far too great to sustain universal free university education 
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Universal free higher education cost too much for the state to maintain.
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The financial burden is too high for the state to handle a universal free university education system.
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Universal free education may be a great idea in practice, but it is not feasible for the government to handle the expenses.
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The experience of higher education have is a right of individuals.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: People have a right to have a higher education.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Every individual has the right to higher education.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Higher education is the right of all.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Individuals have a right to the experience of higher education
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Individuals have a right to equal opportunities that free university provides. 
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: People have a right to equal chance that is provided by free university education.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Everyone deserves the equal opportunities presented by free universities.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Free universities would promote equal opportunities, a right all deserve.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Free university provides equal opportunities to all which is a right of individuals.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The quality of education suffers when university education is free 
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: If education is free, students may put in less effort and get less out of it
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The state benefits from the skills of a university educated populace 
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: An educated population is for the benefit of the state
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: The state is benefited by those with university educated skills.
Output: support
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: State control of  acceptance/curriculum criteria has negative effects 
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Free university education unjustly benefits one subset of society at the expense of everyone 
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: Free university education can unjustly give benefits to some in society at other peoples' expense.
Output: undermine
claim: University education should be free.
 perspective: If free university education is offered then it can give benefits to some in the social system while causing an expense to others.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: We must retain a respect for academia
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: University education gives people something to aim for
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Universities don’t have unlimited places available
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates are more productive as members of society.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: An increase of graduates from college is beneficial to those in society who never attend college.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Many people succeed without college degrees.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Some argue that a college education may not be necessary, since there are many people who have succeeded despite not having college degrees. 
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The question of whether or not a college education is necessary for success is one that is debated, as many successful people are not college educated.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Many college graduates are employed in jobs that do not require college degrees.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Many people with college degrees find themselves working in positions in which their degrees are not a requirement. 
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: More and more college educated people are accepting jobs for which they do not need a college education. 
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College exposes students to diverse people and ideas.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: One of the benefits of a college education is the exposure it provides to a multitude of people and ideas.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College exposes students to a wide  range of experiences and world perspectives.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates are more likely to have health insurance and retirement plans.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Those who graduate from college are more likely to have retirement plans and health insurance.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Graduating from college increases the likelihood of having health insurance and a retirement plan.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Colleges may be indoctrinating students instead of educating them.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Colleges may be brainwashing their students rather than helping them further their education.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: There are more students that are having their views and values shifted during college than in the past.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The children of college graduates are healthier and more prepared for school.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates tend to have healthier, better educated offspring.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Children are typically healthier and more studious when their parents have graduated  college.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: More and more jobs require college degrees.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: A college degree is required for an increasing number of jobs.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: More jobs only hire those with college degrees.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Too many students earning degrees has diluted the value of a bachelor's degree.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The value of a bachelor's degree has lessened.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: A bachelor's degree is considered standard now.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates have more and better employment opportunities.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Graduating from college increases employment opportunities.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The variety and quality of employment opportunities increases for college graduates.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Earning a college degree is a major life achievement.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: A college education is a significant accomplishment.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: One of the most important things that one can achieve in their lifetime is a college education. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Young adults learn interpersonal skills in college.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College imparts interpersonal skills to students.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Graduating from college can keep poverty at bay.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates make more money.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates have lower poverty rates.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates do better financially.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: People who graduate from college have more earning power.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College education has a high return as an investment.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Gaining a college education is money well spent. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Earning college education is always a worthwhile investment. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Learning is always worthwhile.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Learning will always pay off. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Learning and education is always a good investment. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Many recent college graduates are un- or underemployed.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: In recent times, there are significant numbers of unemployed and underemployed college graduates. 
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Among those who are unemployed and underemployed, there are many college graduates. 
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Colleges provide networking value.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Attending college is a great way to network. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Going to college provides many opportunities to network. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: A college degree is no guarantee of workplace benefits.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: There is no guarantee there will be benefits.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Learning a trade profession is a better option than college for many young adults.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Young adults should consider learning a trade instead of going to college.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Trade professions are in need of more individuals and it may be more profitable than going to college.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates are healthier and live longer.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Health and longevity are associated with graduating from a college.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College is an investment in health and longevity.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College graduates attract higher-paying employers to their communities.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Employers are attracted to locales with college graduates. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The more college graduates in one geographical area, the more higher-paying employers will be found
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College allows students to explore career options.
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Attending college affords great chances to check out career options. 
Output: undermine
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: The total cost of going to college also includes the cost of missing opportunities to make money at a job.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College stress can lead to health problems and other negative consequences.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: College degrees do not guarantee learning or job preparation.
Output: support
claim: Encourage fewer people to go to university.
 perspective: Acquiring a degree does not guarantee you a job.
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Exaggeration by the media hurts the situation more than helping it along
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: They make the domestic government appear to be weak and defenseless
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Hostage situations hurt the country's tourism industry
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Can Lead To Wars after sparking hateful sentiment across the board
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Reporting on these events can lead to hateful sentiment and ultimately war.
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Secrecy in hostage-taking events could cool passions and prevent war.
Output: support
claim: Governments should ban the media from reporting hostage-taking.
 perspective: Iraq, five British hostages and a compiracy theory about embezzled funds is unchecked propaganda: That damages the host Country's reputation and thus economy . And only a small group of people made larger than life, by the media are to blame.
Output: support
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Democracies are more likely to be economically successful
Output: support
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Democracies do better at meeting economic needs.
Output: support
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: People's needs are met best in democracies.
Output: support
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Democracy acts in the interest of the general population, which is good for development
Output: support
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Dictatorship outperforms democracy in growth and economic develpment
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: The loger lasting and biggest economic miracles  have ocurred under dictatorships
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Democracies can't mobilize a country as fast as a dictatorship can.
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: In order to develop quickly, a dictator must be in power to sped things up.
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: A dictatorship breeds order and it's a needed step for both development and liberal democracy
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Dictatorships breed development and liberal democracy.
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Breeding of development and liberal democracy under dictatorial rule. 
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Dictatorships are more effective than democracies at mobilizing resources for investment.
Output: undermine
claim: Liberal democracies are better at providing people’s needs than non-democracies.
 perspective: Dictatorships better control the variables of human development
Output: undermine
claim: Boycott the Euro 2012 in Ukraine unless Yulia Timoshenko is released from prison.
 perspective: A boycott won’t help resolve the issues at question
Output: undermine
claim: Boycott the Euro 2012 in Ukraine unless Yulia Timoshenko is released from prison.
 perspective: Boycotting Euro 2012 will highlight Ukraine’s backsliding on human rights
Output: support
claim: Boycott the Euro 2012 in Ukraine unless Yulia Timoshenko is released from prison.
 perspective: This is a sports event not a political event
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US did not have legitimate authority
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US did not have proper authority to act.
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: It was illegal for the US to act.
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: Precedent established that unjust aggression would not be accepted. 
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US did not have the right intentions
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The intentions of the US were suspect.
Output: undermine
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: Iraq could have posed a threat to other US allies in the region, e.g. Saudi Arabia and Israel
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: Iraq acted in a way that threatened the sovereignty of the US allies Saudi Arabia and Israel.
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: Iraq's actions were a direct threat to the United States regional allies, chiefly Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US had Legitimate Authority to go to war
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US had just cause for exerting force in responce to perceived aggression.
Output: support
claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
 perspective: The US had every right to engage in the emerging conflict.
Output: support
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Journalism should report the experiences of the vulnerable and oppressed just as much as those of the elite and powerful. 
Output: undermine
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: It is the responsibility of journalists to report on both the powerful and oppressed.
Output: undermine
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Journalism must cover experiences of all members of a society, the rich and the poor, the powerful and oppressed.
Output: undermine
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Broadcasters almost never show scenes of torture or torment because they know this will cause offence, the same principle should apply here.
Output: support
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Networks should not show offensive material.
Output: support
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Torturous scenes should be kept from publication.
Output: support
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: The job of a journalist is to report the world and events as they see them. Cultural sensibilities do not alter the fact that these events have happened.
Output: undermine
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: Cultures cannot determine news.
Output: undermine
claim: News organisations should be free to exclude news of homosexuality where it causes offence to their viewers.
 perspective: These events have happened, whether cultures approve of them or not.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Animosity Between Turkey and Existing Member States, i.e. Greece
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: There is significant animosity between Turkey and some existing member states.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Some members of the EU have poor relationships with Turkey.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Fear of a Backlash Due to Turkey's Political and Religious Influences
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey's political and religious influences could result in backlash.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey has different political and religious influences than other member states, which could cause issues.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Other similarly situated countries including Romania and Bulgaria have be accepted into the EU.
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: There are precedents including the admission of Romania and Bulgaria into the EU.
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Both Romania and Bulgaria have joined the EU, so it is appropriate for Turkey to be allowed in as well.
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey has precedents, such as Romania and Bulgaria, both of whom were accepted into the EU
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Precedent (Romania and Bulgaria)
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey would be an unstable Muslim state in a traditionally Christian union
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey does not fit well because it is an unstable Muslim country while the EU has a Christian history.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: The religious backgrounds of the EU being Christian and Turkey being Muslim and also not being stable are problems.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey has a poor human rights record
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey joining the EU would help the international fight against terrorism
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Turkey is a highly unstable democracy in an unstable part of the world
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: The lack of stability in Turkey's democracy and in the area around Turkey are factors that argue against admission to the EU.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: The EU will not benefit by adding a country with an unstable democracy in an unstable part of the world.
Output: undermine
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: Any country that fulfils the accession criteria should be allowed to join
Output: support
claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
 perspective: The geographical definition of Europe must be limited and does not include Turkey
Output: undermine
claim: Governments should introduce a flat tax.
 perspective: Why a flat tax isn't 'fair': 
Output: undermine
claim: Governments should introduce a flat tax.
 perspective: Why a flat tax is regressive
Output: undermine
claim: Governments should introduce a flat tax.
 perspective: Why a flat tax is fairer
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: The longer a single leader remains in power, the more entrenched his grip becomes, and the more likely he is to use his office to his personal advantage.
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Longer terms for Politicians could lead to unfairness in governing
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: If a single leader sits on the throne for too long, it's more likely for the leader to exploit his or her power. 
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: The longer a politician remains in office, the more entrenched his grip becomes, and the more likely he is to use his office to his personal advantage:
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: If there's no term limit, the leader will likely exploit his power to personal advantages by staying too long in the office. 
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: the longer someone is  in power, the more likely he will use it for personal advantage
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: as times went one, the more someone is in control of his power, the more likely he will succumb to use such power for personal advantage
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: By imposing mandatory term limits on politicians, we are saying the citizens are not capable of making good decisions about their elected officials.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits are undemocratic and suggest, falsely, that voters cannot make intelligent decisions about their leaders on their own.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: The use of term limits in politics shows a lack of faith in the ability of voters to choose the best candidate for office.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits should be voted on 
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: By having term limits, it makes voters feel that they can't decide on a leader by themselves
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: With term limits, voters are not seen as intelligent voters
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits are undemocratic and suggest, falsely, that voters cannot make intelligent decisions about their representatives without guidance:
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: congress needs term limits to ensure different points of views 
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: term limits help with fresh ideas
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits allows new blood in the office and prevents one leader from staying in power for too long.
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits check the power of incumbency as an election-winning tool and allow new and energetic leaders and ideas to flourish.
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: term limits allow a balance check and allow for new fresh leaders to take position
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: it is our best interest to have term limits for diversity
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits create more competitive elections for public office that empower new leaders and ideas:
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Having a new leader allow new ideas and thoughts in the office. 
Output: support
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: The incentive for corruption and self-enrichment in office is increased by term limits:
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits could lead one to be more dishonest to get the job done quicker
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Having term limits on some leaders, puts too much power in the hands of non-limited officials.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: When some leaders are subject to term limits and some are not, the balance of power in uneven.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: With term limits, there is too much power given to those that aren't leaders
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: Term limits take too much power away from the leaders that were chosen
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: A strong, consistent executive may be desirable in many cases.
Output: undermine
claim: We must enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government.
 perspective: There are some circumstances when one would want a strong, consistent executive branch of government in place.
Output: undermine