niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
claim: The world should go vegan.
 perspective: Vegetarian diets allow more calcium to be absorbed than from meat and leads to healthy bones.
Output: support
claim: The world should go vegan.
 perspective: Meat is the most convenient protein source available. 
Output: undermine
claim: The world should go vegan.
 perspective: Meat is the most readily available protein.
Output: undermine
claim: The world should go vegan.
 perspective: Most find that meat is a very convenient source of protein.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Sustainability of such taxes and their effect on sustainability within a country.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: High taxes on mining and extraction would cause many adverse affects on the country and its citizens.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: The effect a high tax will have on businesses.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Domestic and Global impact of such a tax will be too great.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: The domestic and global impact of high mining taxes will have huge a negative impact.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: The impact of having high mining taxes will be bad on a domestic and a global scale.
Output: undermine
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Sustained Overexploitation Leads to Depletion
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Sterilising Boom Revenues Helps Saving.
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: High taxes protect domestic resources.
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: High Mining Taxes would Balance the Economy
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: The economy could benefit from the imposition of mining taxes.
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Mining taxes could reduce the deficit.
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
Output: support
claim: Governments of resource-rich nations should impose high taxes on mining and extraction.
 perspective: Government's Obligation to Benefit Citizens
Output: support
claim: We must all believe in fundamental human rights.
 perspective: Universal benefits of human rights
Output: support
claim: The environment is being sacrificed for the economy.
 perspective: Air pollution will get even worse. 
Output: support
claim: The environment is being sacrificed for the economy.
 perspective: Air pollution gets worse over time.
Output: support
claim: The environment is being sacrificed for the economy.
 perspective: air pollution is going to get worse
Output: support
claim: The environment is being sacrificed for the economy.
 perspective: the pollution in the air is going to get worse
Output: support
claim: Restrictions must be imposed on overseas players in football.
 perspective: It will improve the quality of the national team
Output: support
claim: Restrictions must be imposed on overseas players in football.
 perspective: It makea the National team a better quality.
Output: support
claim: Restrictions must be imposed on overseas players in football.
 perspective: The national team will be helped by it
Output: support
claim: Restrictions must be imposed on overseas players in football.
 perspective: The quality of the national team will improve.
Output: support
claim: Restrictions must be imposed on overseas players in football.
 perspective: The improvement of quality of the national team is likely.
Output: support
claim: School uniforms must be banned.
 perspective: School uniforms are often expensive
Output: support
claim: School uniforms must be banned.
 perspective: Individuality and creativity should be encouraged
Output: support
claim: School uniforms must be banned.
 perspective: School uniforms create a sense of equality
Output: undermine
claim: School uniforms must be banned.
 perspective: School uniforms contribute to the sense of school unity
Output: undermine
claim: Targeted online advertising on the basis of user profiles and demographics must be banned.
 perspective: Individual targeting undermines market and political fairness
Output: support
claim: Targeted online advertising on the basis of user profiles and demographics must be banned.
 perspective: This advertising strategy provides benefits by making marketing more efficient and allows smaller markets to develop
Output: undermine
claim: Targeted online advertising on the basis of user profiles and demographics must be banned.
 perspective: This advertising strategy undermines people’s right to personal privacy
Output: support
claim: Gorbachev Was Responsible for The Collapse Of The USSR.
 perspective: Perestroika put the final nails in the USSR’s economy
Output: undermine
claim: Gorbachev Was Responsible for The Collapse Of The USSR.
 perspective: The System Needed to Change in Order to Survive in the Longer Term; That Mikhail Gorbachev’s Reforms Failed Showed that the USSR Could Not be Saved
Output: undermine
claim: Gorbachev Was Responsible for The Collapse Of The USSR.
 perspective: It was dead from the time Stalin took control
Output: undermine
claim: Gorbachev Was Responsible for The Collapse Of The USSR.
 perspective: Lenin and Stalin the real destroyers of the USSR for destroying Socialism’s Appeal
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History lessons can be used as state-sponsored propaganda, distorting the events of the past
Output: support
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: where we have been can help us with where we are going
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Teaching history ensures that events of the past are not forgotten, and lessons are learned
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: We learn from the mistakes and successes of others
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History teaching will reflect the erroneous preconceptions and aims of those who set the curriculum
Output: support
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History should be taught to school-children, they form an integral part of understanding oneself and one's nation
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History should always have a place in the schoolroom because it is vital to an understanding of why things are the way they are. 
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: To understand how things came to be, school children should be taught historical facts and figures. 
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Schoolchildren need to learn history since it is an integral part of learning about one's country.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History teaches useful skills applicable in other areas of education and life
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Without a firm foundation of historical knowledge, children will have a harder time learning necessary skills. 
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: A good education relies on a strong foundation of historical knowledge.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History is a useful subject because it teaches useful skills.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: It's a good idea to teach history since kids can learn useful skills they can use throughout their lives.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Historical facts can be established to a sufficient degree to be taught to schoolchildren
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Schools should teach historical facts. 
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: Children need to learn historical facts in order to be competitive in a global job market.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: If taught properly, historical facts can be taught to schoolchildren without problems.
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History is a good thing to teach to schoolchildren if taught the right way,
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History offers knowledge that coincides with other subjects
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: History is something that people need to know. 
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: history is an important subject
Output: undermine
claim: History has no place in the classroom.
 perspective: history repeats itself if not known
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: There is no evidence that homework makes a difference for young children.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework has little educational worth, and therefore is a waste of students' time
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: There is a lack of evidence that homework helps younger children
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Small children are not helped by having homework.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework is an essential part of education, allowing students to learn information beyond that which they are taught at school.
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework is crucial to a well rounded education as it is the means by which students are encouraged to learn beyond the school curriculum.
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework allows students to explore and learn beyond the instruction they are given in the classroom.
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework ensures that students practise what they are taught at school
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework provides a link between child, school and the home
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Yes, kids need to balance out mental and physical exercise.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Kids need time to do many different kinds of activities. 
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: There needs to be a balance for kids between mental and physical stimulation.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Mental stimulation and physical exercise need to have the proper balance in children.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Too much homework can be harmful
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Yes Homework Should Have A Limit
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Yes, it should.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Assigning large amounts of homework isn't good for students.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Too much homework is detrimental.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework puts students off learning
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework disadvantages low-income students
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Low-income students are at a disadvantage when it comes to homework.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework doesn't help low-income students succeed.
Output: support
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework allows parents to be involved with their child's learning
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework is beneficial because of parent/child involvement
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework helps parents understand what their children are learning.
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework can get parents involved
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework helps involve parents 
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework improves student achievement
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Assigning homework to students improves their level of achievement
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: homework is good for students
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework helps to reinforce learning and develop good study habits and life skills
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework teaches good habits and responsibility
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework is good for learning
Output: undermine
claim: Homework should be banned.
 perspective: Homework is good to create study habits
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are an example of violence that has no place in baseball.  
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: collisions and violence should not be in baseball
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are not as dangerous as they’re feared to be.  
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are not necessarily dangerous.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions in MLB aren't all that bad.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: The safety concerns about collision are overblown
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: There is an overreaction to the dangers of collisions
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are unnecessary.  
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: collisions are not good
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are a part of the game.  
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: It's a major part of the game.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions happen in baseball and should be left as is.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are just part of the game of baseball
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: One of the things that is part of baseball is having collisions
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are dangerous and lead to injury.  
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: collisions are very dangerous
Output: undermine
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Without collisions, either the catcher or the runner would have an enormous and unfair advantage.  
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: The catcher or runner would have a ridiculous advantage if collisions were not allowed.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Banning collisions would fundamentally change portions of the game.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Taking away collisions would give an advantage to one side
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: By taking away collisions, you would give one side an unfair advantage
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are exciting and fun to watch.  
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are an exciting part of the sport.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Physicality is an important and fun part of major league baseball.
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: Collisions are an exciting part of the game
Output: support
claim: Major league baseball should continue to allow collisions at home plate.
 perspective: It is exciting to watch a collision
Output: support
claim: The internet’s anonymity is beneficial.
 perspective: cyber-bullying  ubiquitously leads to child solicitation,murder,identity theft and all sorts of other crimes & misdemeanors
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: Alternative- and more efficient- methods of funding universities are available
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: There are more efficient alternative methods of funding universities available.
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: Alternative methods of funding universities that are more efficient are available.
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: University's could use alternate funding. 
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: It is time to make higher education more affordable. 
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: Graduates may move abroad to avoid tax payments
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: Setting up a graduate tax system would be damagingly expensive
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: A graduate tax would reduce teh autonomy of universities
Output: undermine
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: A graduate tax would make university funding more sustainable
Output: support
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: Delivering funding via a graduate tax is the best way to encourage more students to enter higher education
Output: support
claim: Provision of higher education must be funded by taxing graduates.
 perspective: A graduate tax would make access to higher education fairer and more equitable
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws such as background checks and micro-stamping are an invasion of privacy. 
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Background checks and micro-stamping to purchase a gun are an invasion of privacy.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The privacy of citizens is invaded if they are forced into background checks and micro-stamping to purchase guns.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A majority of adults, including gun owners, support common sense gun control such as background checks, bans on assault weapons, and bans on high-capacity magazines.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A majority of adults with the inclusion of gun owners support common sense gun control including background checks, bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A majority of adults with the inclusion of gun owners support common sense gun control such as background checks, banning assault weapons, and bans on high-capacity magazines.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The Second Amendment of the US Constitution protects individual gun ownership.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: An assault weapons ban would violate the second amendment
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Individual gun ownership is guaranteed via the Second Amendment.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: It is by the protection of a Second Amendment to the US constitution, that people might have individual gun ownership.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The right to own guns is not unlimited because of the Second Amendment. 
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The constitutional second amendment does not mean you can own guns in an unlimited way.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Civilians, including hunters, should not own military-grade firearms or firearm accessories. 
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The military grade firearms and accessories should not be owned by civilans, which include hunters.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: No civilians, including the ones who hunt, should have any military grade firearms, or accessories.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control is not needed; education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control is unnecessary because relatively few people are killed by guns.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: fewer people are getting killed by guns so no new laws are needed
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: High-capacity magazines should be banned because they too often turn murder into mass murder.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: High-capacity magazines could be banned because they too turn murder into mass murder.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Far reaching magazines should be banned because they often turn murder into mass murder.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: If criminals want to obtain guns, they will no matter the laws.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Criminals do not respect laws and will still obtain guns.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking laws.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws would prevent citizens from protecting themselves from foreign invaders.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control efforts have proved ineffective. 
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The homicide rates and suicide rates are less in countries that have strict gun control, versus the US.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The rates of gun crime are less in the countries who restrict guns, versus the United States.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control leads to fewer suicides.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Countries with restrictive gun control laws have lower gun homicide and suicide rates than the United States.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control is leading to fewer suicides.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control can lead to fewer suicides.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control laws are needed to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control laws are needed in the protection of women from domestic abusers and stalkers.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Armed civilians are unlikely to stop crimes and are more likely to make dangerous situations, including mass shootings, more deadly. 
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Crimes, like mass shootings, are unlikely to be stopped by armed civilians and would likely make it more dangerous, instead.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: When a crime takes place that can be really difficult, it will not help to have armed civilians, as they will only escalate it.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws, especially those that try to ban "assault weapons," infringe upon the right to own guns for hunting and sport.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A ban on assault weapons infringes on an individuals right to own guns for sport.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws give too much power to the government and may result in government tyranny and the government taking away all guns from citizens.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws take power away from the people and set up an environment ripe for tyranny.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Government tyranny is likely if the government takes away guns from citizens.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws decrease the sense of individual safety and the right to self-defense.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Individual safety and the ability to protect oneself are hurt by gun control laws.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Assault weapons are not used in most crimes
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Strict gun control laws do not work in Mexico, and will not work in the United States.
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A ban on assault weapons would not work, it will simply encourage a black market
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: An assault weapons ban would stop the manufacture of many of the deadliest guns.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Assault weapons are not necessary for self defence or hunting.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: There are no compelling reasons to have assault weapons.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Assault weapons are not used for practical purposes like self defense or hunting.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: It is incoherent to ban some guns
Output: undermine
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: More gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws would reduce the societal costs associated with gun violence.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Enacting gun control laws such as mandatory safety features would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths. 
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A ban would save lives 
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Having increased gun control laws would reduce deaths by guns.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Providing gun control laws can reduc societal costs associated with gun violence.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Gun control laws can reduce societal costs associated with gun violence.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: Lives could be saved with this measure.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: A ban would lower mortality.
Output: support
claim: More gun control laws should be enacted.
 perspective: It would lessen the amount of accidental deaths from gun accidents if enacting some mandatory safety features.
Output: support
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: Only help those who ask for it and that too at your discretion
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: Should we as people help everyone or only certain ones.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: Individuals should help everyone.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: People have the freedom to choose whether they want to dedicate their time to helping others, and help should only be given to those who ask for it.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: Help should only be provided to those that want it, and individuals should be able to choose if they want to help or not.
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: It would be nice if everyone would help those in need but it cant't be forced and people have to make those decisions on their own. 
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: 2.  consequentialism - we must reduce overall suffering, helping people reduces suffering in the world
Output: support
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: It's none of your business
Output: undermine
claim: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.
 perspective: virtue ethics - we become better people
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: 'Violence' is a blurry concept and could lead to banning good games.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Rate of violence has been steadily dropping as violent games are being released
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games reduce crime
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent Video Games Contribute to decreased Crime Rates
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: violence drops with video games
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: violent video games decrease violence
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: The violence in games isn't represented negatively, but instead shown to be rewarded
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: No games influence their players
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: No, Violent Video Games Don't Cause Mass Shootings
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Video games do not influence players to commit real world violence.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Games have no influence on players
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Games do not influence the player
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: There are far larger contributing factors to violent crime.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: There has always been violence
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violence existed before video games. 
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: There was always violence
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: There always was violence 
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: The Responsibility Lies With Parents
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Research has shown violent video games encourage criminal and anti-social behaviour
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: people immitate video games.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: violent games make people agressive.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Playing violent video games leads to violent behaviors.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: The American Psychological Association (APA) lists violent video games as a risk factor for aggressive behavior.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent Video Games cause Violent Behaviour
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: real life violent behaviors may be stimulated by video games
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games are seen as a risk factor for aggressive behavior, according to the American Psychological Association (APA)
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent Video Games Cause Social Interaction Problems
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games lead to inappropriate social interactions.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games are detrimental to social interaction.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video games desensitise users
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent games normalizes forms of violence.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Restrictions would be ineffective
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Restricting video games only makes people more interested in them. 
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: The government has a right to restrict the sale of violent video games, in order to protect law and order.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: In order to maintan a well funcitoning society, the government has a right to restrict violent games which could hurt people.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Video games are content that has a right to be censored for the mass majority's public safety.
Output: support
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Gun violence is less prevalent in countries with high video game use.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Countries with high video game use see less gun violence
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and "prosocial” behaviors.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: There are many flaws to the theory that violent video games cause real life violence.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed.
Output: undermine
claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
 perspective: Playing violent video games does not cause kids to commit mass shootings.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Easily affordable drugs will mean greater access
Output: support
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Cheaper drugs aren’t trusted by consumers
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Consumers don't trust drugs that are cheaper than others.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Consumers don't place as much trust in drugs that are cheaper.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Dominance of generic drugs will reduce reinvestment and innovation in donating countries
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: If generic drugs flourish innovation will decrease.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Generic drugs threaten innovation.
Output: undermine
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Reduce the prominence of bad and fake drugs
Output: support
claim: We have to produce high quality generic drugs for Africa.
 perspective: Unfair to apply same patent laws universally
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artefacts are enriched by being viewed in their place of origin
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artifacts are best viewed where they came from.
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Viewing an artifact in its native area is beneficial to its perception.
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Having artefacts in different locations encourages us to think of our common origins
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artefacts should be repatriated....including the people which were stolen and scattered world wide!
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: These artefacts should bring revenue to the counties of origin
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artefacts should be accessible to the largest amount of visitors possible 
Output: support
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: The historical significance of artefacts extends beyond their culture of origin
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Scholars will have better access to artefacts, and more opportunities for study and collaboration, if they are stored in the west
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artifacts should be kept where they are safest so that everyone has access to them. 
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Many countries do not have the means to protect precious artifacts so they should remain in the West where they are safe. 
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: Artefacts should be made accessible to the largest possible number of visitors
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: In many cases, returning an artefact may prove to be unreasonably expensive
Output: undermine
claim: Historical Artefacts Should Be Repatriated to Their Country of Origin.
 perspective: The West should not have to spend enormous sums of money to return artifacts to their original locations.
Output: undermine
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History offers knowledge that coincides with other subjects
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History is something that people need to know. 
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: history is an important subject
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: history repeats itself if not known
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: where we have been can help us with where we are going
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Teaching history ensures that events of the past are not forgotten, and lessons are learned
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: We learn from the mistakes and successes of others
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History lessons can be used as state-sponsored propaganda, distorting the events of the past
Output: undermine
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History teaching will reflect the erroneous preconceptions and aims of those who set the curriculum
Output: undermine
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History should be taught to school-children, they form an integral part of understanding oneself and one's nation
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History should always have a place in the schoolroom because it is vital to an understanding of why things are the way they are. 
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: To understand how things came to be, school children should be taught historical facts and figures. 
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Schoolchildren need to learn history since it is an integral part of learning about one's country.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History teaches useful skills applicable in other areas of education and life
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Without a firm foundation of historical knowledge, children will have a harder time learning necessary skills. 
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: A good education relies on a strong foundation of historical knowledge.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History is a useful subject because it teaches useful skills.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: It's a good idea to teach history since kids can learn useful skills they can use throughout their lives.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Historical facts can be established to a sufficient degree to be taught to schoolchildren
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Schools should teach historical facts. 
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: Children need to learn historical facts in order to be competitive in a global job market.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: If taught properly, historical facts can be taught to schoolchildren without problems.
Output: support
claim: History as a subject in school is needed.
 perspective: History is a good thing to teach to schoolchildren if taught the right way,
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers wont die, they’ll adapt
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers will evolve with the times and remain relevant. 
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers will adapt to the modern world. 
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: newspapers are more versatile
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: newspapers are more convenient
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are much more convenient than the alternatives. 
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: A tangible newspaper is more convenient than other alternatives. 
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are a more trustworthy source of information than independent bloggers
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Independent bloggers lack the credibility of newspapers.
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are more credible than independent blogger reports.
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers offer a better reading experience than digital alternatives
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers are financially unviable
Output: support
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers provide higher quality journalism than other media
Output: undermine
claim: Newspapers Are a Thing of the Past.
 perspective: Newspapers employ credentialled reporters.
Output: undermine