niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
topic: "My dick is bigger than yours." - Matt Damon
sentence: C2) Matt Damon is awesome -- see Good Will Hunting or his rant against Sarah Palin.
Output: Value
topic: "My dick is bigger than yours." - Matt Damon
sentence: If not, it could be a challenge or a troll attempt, both of which are acceptable.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: -- We don't need to change the law we need to enforce the laws we have and make politicians accountable to the people.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: But, ultimately it's the people who decide regardless of where the money comes from.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: For the better of our political process, for the better of our country, and for the better of this world.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: He raised more money than any campaign in history without taking a dime from lobbyists.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: He ran an entire campaign primarily off small contributions from everyday people.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: I am not advocating any specific way, I am simply noting that there is a problem and some type of reform is necessary to fix it.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: It is widely believe to be his wealth that helped him here.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Mitt Romney this election cycle was largely self-funded.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: No more should this occur.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Oh, McCain's wife does.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Perhaps candidates could have limits of how much personal wealth could be spent campaigning.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Romney failed.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Ross Perot did do well because he had money.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Take Ross Peroe, for example.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: That's the point of democracy.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: The only time in recent history when a third-party candidate got an appreciable amount of the vote.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: The people aren't stupid and they vote for those who will best serve them.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: The system works.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: There is also another problem with campaign finance as it stands.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: These are not democratic ideals.
Output: Value
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: This campaign season we discovered a rather impressive loophole that McCain wrote into the McCain-Feingold Campaign finance reform bill that exempts travel on your wife's private company jet.
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: This should not happen.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: We must, as a people, hold them accountable.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: We should not stand for this.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: What we really need are run off elections and the ability of third party candidates to have a voice without sapping votes off from the second choice candidates.
Output: Policy
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Who's wife would even have a private company jet?
Output: Fact
topic: 4a. Campaign Finance Reform
sentence: Why did he do so well?
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: 
  
God has given us the gift of choice.
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: 
  
I think abortion is bad because we are killing an unborn baby and we aren't giving it a fair chance at life.
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: It's bad to abort, when the child will end up dying from starvation or disease?
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: It's bad to not end the life before they suffer?
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: So wouldn't it be better to abort the child?
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: Think of a woman that gets pregnant.
Output: Value
topic: Abortion Is Bad
sentence: Think of third world countries.
Output: Value
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: 
  
  Thank you, Pro, for reminding me why I don't have cable.
Output: Value
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: 2.
Output: Fact
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: 3.
Output: Fact
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: Ghosts are shown on TV shows.
Output: Fact
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: He explains his curiously horrible second premise with a sub-argument:  1.
Output: Value
topic: Are ghosts real?
sentence: News is unbiased, and informative.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: 
  
  
  Evolution is the most fact based theory and has logical premises and conclusions, which should therefore make it accepted.
Output: Policy
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: 
  
Evolution is a scientific theory that has been around for less than 200 years.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Adaptation   
  Adaptation occurs when a species evolves to better survive in its environment.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: As these genetics continued to be passed on because they increased the survival of a species, and the dinosaurs without the genetics were more likely to die off, an entire new species eventually   evolved   out of these passed down genetics.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Birds that live in tropical forests may have long, thick curved beaks used for eating fruit.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Birds who live near rivers may have long beaks that are good for snatching fish out of the water.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Depending on the ecosystem a bird is in, their beaks may be different in order to better suit their needs.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: For example, the Tyrannosaurus Rex lived in the Cretaceous Period but not before.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Fossil Record   
  A large amount of creatures that no longer exist today have existed in the past and have been found through fossilization.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: I am opposed to evolution being taught in school because of its unproven nature.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: I think both of these are good examples supporting evolution, which has solid premises and a logical conclusion.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: If we do not accept evolution as true then the T. Rex must have always existed and then died out, but we know this to be untrue.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: It can also be found that certain species existed later than others, but do not exist now.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: It does not rely on chance that it may be wrong unlike a fight where a lucky punch could win.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Jordan is slow, weak, has had little training, and has been defeated by men that are worse fighters than Michael.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Michael is stronger, faster, has had more training, and has a far better record than Jordan.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: So in order for a new species to exist a genetic mutation must occur and be dominant in an already existing species.
Output: Fact
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: Thank you.
Output: Value
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: This being said, evolution should therefore be accepted in order to further scientific progress and knowledge.
Output: Policy
topic: Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet
sentence: This is because genetic mutations which allowed a certain species to better survive became dominant eventually evolving the bird to better survive in its environment.
Output: Fact
topic: Fails are hilarious
sentence: 
  
  Fails, like the ones on FailArmy, are awesome.
Output: Value
topic: Fails are hilarious
sentence: Because he's provided no argument, vote CON.
Output: Value
topic: Fails are hilarious
sentence: So let's get this over with.
Output: Value
topic: Farooq will win this debate
sentence: 
  
The choice is obvious, for I will most certainly not win this debate because I have decided to waste people's time with an issue as petty as this, when there are far more interested and spirited conversations going on elsewhere.
Output: Testimony
topic: Farooq will win this debate
sentence: It is simply an ongoing process of accumulation.
Output: Fact
topic: Farooq will win this debate
sentence: There is no objective measure for the end of voting.
Output: Fact
topic: Fat MPs should have to be elected twice, as they take up double the space in the House of Commons
sentence: 
  
HA HA!
Output: Value
topic: Fat MPs should have to be elected twice, as they take up double the space in the House of Commons
sentence: You really funny, the house of common is HUGE!
Output: Testimony
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: 
  
Gym class should not be a requirement.
Output: Policy
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: 
  
Pro's first point seeks to achieve that the mental health of some teenagers is at risk through experiences in the changing room.
Output: Fact
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: As I have said it naturally brings psychological benefits which outweigh these feelings of insecurity which we all go through as teenagers in high school as part of life.
Output: Value
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: As the government is responsible for children's well being while in school it is their duty to install a well rounded education and this includes sport.
Output: Policy
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: If a student wants to be an athlete or in the military then they should have multiple gym classes.
Output: Policy
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: It also accounts for the only exercise many high school children have.
Output: Fact
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: It is important to at least try and install a healthy lifestyle in children that are subjected to a culture of fast food and laziness.
Output: Policy
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: Learning to deal with uncomfortable social situations is one of the most highly valued life skills in our modern world and the diversity of a high school curriculum, including gym, and social hierarchy is what prepares us best for the real world because it is all very well having high grades if you can't use your knowledge to the best of your own ability or an employers needs because you don't know how to cope socially.
Output: Value
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: She also seeks to prove that gym is a distraction and restricts studies however having competitively played basketball and done athletics for my school and outside of school through out my high school career and am now doing a masters degree in physics at university.
Output: Testimony
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: Team skills are also good to have when your working with people you do like too.
Output: Value
topic: Gym class should NOT be a requirement for high school
sentence: Therefore gym class should be optional.
Output: Policy
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: 
  
Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are twins.
Output: Fact
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: I am an anime fan as well and have watched Ouran High School Host Club a couple times over.
Output: Testimony
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: I have never read the manga so if they did have a fight after the events shown in the television show I do not know about it.
Output: Testimony
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: If I were with only one brother (and if I were homosexual if a romantic relationship is implied) I think they would still be happy assuming the other twin in also being emotionally occupied with an alternate relationship.
Output: Value
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: In the Host Club Hikaru and Kaoru play the part of a the "forbidden love" characters with their apparent sexual attraction toward each other.
Output: Fact
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: It is proven in episode 16 that Hikaru has romantic feelings toward Haruhi and seems to be able to be happy with her without Koaru present.
Output: Fact
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: They both are very different, but without each other, they don't know what to do.
Output: Value
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: They have had issues with each other, but not enough so that they ever had a legitimate fight.
Output: Fact
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: They have never had a fight (except that one episode, but it was fake!!!)
Output: Fact
topic: Hikaru and Kaoru Hitachiin are better together than apart
sentence: lost and alone, sure, they would have you, but it would be like ripping them in half, leaving them incomplete.
Output: Value
topic: I Am A Wizard
sentence: 
  
If you are a true wizard, I dare you to make me won in THIS debate and in the REST of my challenge debate.
Output: Testimony
topic: I Am A Wizard
sentence: I dare anyone to disagree.
Output: Testimony
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: 
  
"Well duh."
Output: Value
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: 
  
Minus numbers are whole numbers.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: 
  
Resolved: InfraRedEd irritates/has irritated/amuses/has amused one or more members of debate.org.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: "My opponent needs to prove that usernames cannot be changed at will."
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: "No, you cannot have 1 1/2 members.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: "Note that it does not say 'successfully.'"
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: "Well then surely my opponent could exhibit one or two."
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: "[2] Courts called on to interpret it have applied a wide variety of standards, with little agreement."
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Again, this is irrelevant.
Output: Value
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Girls brain develop differently from boys brains.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: His "and/or" arguments are irrelevant.
Output: Value
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: I am the funniest guy I know.
Output: Testimony
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: I'm certain other members have been irritated and/or amused by his antics.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: In addition, he has amused me with his persistent use of the argument "m", and with his blatant sexism.
Output: Testimony
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Judges have called it a "freakish fad," an "accuracy-destroying symbol," and "meaningless."
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Note that all '/' indicate 'and/or'" This has been shown to be true.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: One or more: A number equal to, or greater than one  
  
No, you cannot have 1 1/2 members.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Perhaps most crushing of all, the Kentucky Supreme Court said it was a "much-condemned conjunctive-disjunctive crutch of sloppy thinkers."
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: So is zero.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: This burden is absurd, and the resolution can be affirmed without said proof.
Output: Value
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Thus, my opponent concedes that, InfraRedEd has amused one or more members of debate.org, proving the resolution to be true.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Well duh.
Output: Value
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: You should see the bad ones.
Output: Policy
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Zero comments.
Output: Fact
topic: InfraRedEd
sentence: Zero votes.
Output: Fact
topic: Is it wrong for atheists to try and 'convert' theists?
sentence: Go ahead, challenge this and look foolish.
Output: Value
topic: Is it wrong for atheists to try and 'convert' theists?
sentence: It is imperative for the survival of the human race that Atheists eradicate the ignorance of evolution and science.
Output: Fact
topic: Is it wrong for atheists to try and 'convert' theists?
sentence: People who believe things without evidence, do not help advance science.
Output: Value
topic: Is it wrong for atheists to try and 'convert' theists?
sentence: Since you have agreed that atheism is a non-belief, yes it is wrong for atheist to convert people to atheism because it is impossible and ignorant.
Output: Value
topic: Is it wrong for atheists to try and 'convert' theists?
sentence: So yes, it is wrong for atheists to try and convert theists.
Output: Value
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: 
  
A basketball player is a basketball player.
Output: Fact
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: 
  
Lebron James is a better player than Kevin Durant because he has more experience and is more well rounded.
Output: Value
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: Complete package.
Output: Value
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: He's a better shooter than LBJ, and stats show Durant is doing better on defense.
Output: Value
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: He's younger: which means he can only get better, and LeBron is at the age where athleticism starts to fade.
Output: Value
topic: Lebron is better than Durant.
sentence: If one is better he is better.
Output: Value
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: 
  
1.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: 
  
In the last round, rules 1, 2, and 3 all used the word "is", a violation of rule 1 from round 1.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: -He looked at that whaling ship in Japan.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: -Whaling in Japan bores.
Output: Value
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: 1.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: 2.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: 5.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: Both players should still have the ability to post rules in their turn.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: Breaking a rule cannot result in the victory of the rule-breaker.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: CON must us proper spelling and grammar.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: In his 2nd rule above, he uses the term "whaling", which, having checked the dictionary, is verifiably a noun.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: It was not plural, and he therefore broke my third rule in round #1, therefore I lost, and then afterwards you lost.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: Japanese countries aren't not against whaling.
Output: Fact
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: The guy who started this debate is limited to saying things pertaining to the whaling activities in Japan.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: The guy who started this debate must have at least 1 obstruction that rhymes with "Japan", the country that is a member of the international whaling commission.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: The person with the user-name "wjmelements" may only make rules in the form of double-negatives, from this point forth.
Output: Policy
topic: My opponent will lose this debate if he or she does not follow these rules.
sentence: The year that the Japan whaling association was founded (1959), minus 1946, is the maximum number of words that the guy who started this debate can use per obstruction.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: "This is the result of citizens in democracies not doing their sacred duty which may in turn result in bad governance."
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: * Not requiring registration to vote prior to voting (citizenship should suffice)  
  
However, as it stands, if corrupt folks were just tossed out on their ear and the government functioned like it should, there's be little need to care.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: * The time to vote should be increased, for at least a week, in many locations as well as mail in voting.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: -- You honestly want to force disinterested people into voting, removing their choice, and choosing punishments for failure to comply in order to make them go to the polls and pull a random level and change a total of nothing?
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Also, voting isn't a sacred duty.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Because we have freedom not to vote, we abstain.
Output: Fact
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Choosing not to vote weakens the fabric of democracy, so we must remove their choice.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Do you realize how twisted this sounds?
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: For example, did you know that the voting rate is better in Cuba and in Saddam's Iraq than it is in the US, and they only had one party systems... and similar provisions to your rules.
Output: Fact
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Freedom does not mean remaining passive spectator and being lethargic to go to the polling stations and vote.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Governance by leaders elected by minority voters violates the spirit of democracy.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: I feel that penal provisions for violation of this fundamental duty by citizens must be made punishable,though freedom is the essence of democracy.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: I'm sorry, but this idea cannot be taken seriously.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: If everybody thinks that it does not matter whether he votes or abstains from voting, the fabric of democracy weakens.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: In many leading democracies the percentage of eligible voter participation is declining with the result that the winning candidates get away with a minority of the total vote percentage.
Output: Fact
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Nothing holy or even slightly difficult about it.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: Responsible voting matters, so we must force disinterested people into voting.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: The choices aren't that great and for the most part voting doesn't change the outcome.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: The only thing you're going to do is force ignorant voters to the polls who don't understand the issue to vote fairly randomly.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: There are plenty of problems with government, not enough idiots voting isn't one of them.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: This is the result of citizens in democracies not doing their sacred duty which may in turn result in bad governance.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: We could do many thing to improve the voting and to make the voting count for more, we could elect better people and fix the system, we could do a better job at counting the votes cast, and keeping legal voters on the voter rolls... and we should.
Output: Policy
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: What I want to emphasize is that many voters are not doing their sacred once in 4/5 years duty of voting and electing leaders.
Output: Value
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: You go into the polling place and put a mark next to whoever the Democrat in the election is and leave.
Output: Fact
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: You have a right to vote or not to vote.
Output: Fact
topic: NON VOTING IN ELECTIONS MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
sentence: You want to force a person to do something they don't want to do upon penalty of law.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: 
  
Abortion violates the constitution, the constitution clearly states that murder is illegal in every way.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: 
  
Is my opponent not aware that a mother is 77% more likely to be injured or killed during an abortion than they would having childbirth?
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: 
  
So I perused through my digital copy of the Constitution, and I still found no references to murder, so if you'd like to give me a section, or line or amendment that'd be rather helpful.
Output: Testimony
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Abortion - the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Also I'd like to point out that the quote you made states that murder is never a crime.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Also, when you abort a child you could be taking away the country's potential.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Cialis can cause swelling of tongue as a listed side effect.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Does that mean the elderly don't deserve boners?
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Especially before turning snarky on me.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: I guess I should thank you for acknowledging my efforts.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: I think you need go back and reread the documents you're trying to quote.
Output: Policy
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: I'd like to say however as a final closing remark.
Output: Testimony
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: I'll still pitch in the mother's right to her own body however, as she should fully well have the option of removing a parasitic being from her body before it causes 9 months of medical and financial havoc and 18 years + of legal and financial trouble if she so desires.
Output: Policy
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: If it dies, then it wasn't meant to be.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: If you want a mathematical counter, I can say 'or they might become Hitler' but I'll simply say to make something illegal simply because of the tiny probability of a certain consequence is ridiculous.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: In fact NO US document expresses rights to live and love.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: It was aborted.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Let us define abortion eh?
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Most abortions are from teenage mothers who made the mistake of having sex and became pregnant, my point being that if that infection from the uterus does affect some teens, say they want to have children when they are older, they can't because she decided she wanted to kill her mistake she made when she was younger.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Now to deal with those, as a commenter pointed out and as i would have myself, the constitution does not actually mention the illegality of murder.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Punishment - The infliction or imposition of penalty as retribution for an offense.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: Risky procedures exist, and without base numbers of injury rates, saying a 77% increase doesn't mean much.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: So aborting a fetus is not going to rob the world of the cure to cancer anymore than it will prevent the next Hitler.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: So the basic premise of the first point falls flat.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: That's a law sure, but not every law is contained in the US constitution.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: That's just a tad bit silly to imagine.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: The Declaration of Independance however does say all men have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: The constitution also never declares rights to live, love and pursuit of happiness.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: The constitution also states that there should be no cruel and unusual punishment.
Output: Fact
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: When you abort a child you are murdering it before that child can experience life.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: You are cruelly punishing this baby for crimes it never committed.
Output: Value
topic: Should abortion be made illegal?
sentence: You can argue a right to life, and sure, give it that.
Output: Policy
topic: The Debates here are about who's the best BSer rather than about real facts
sentence: Debating here is a waste of time.
Output: Value
topic: The Debates here are about who's the best BSer rather than about real facts
sentence: It's all about who the best BS artist is.
Output: Value
topic: The Debates here are about who's the best BSer rather than about real facts
sentence: They are facts that have documented sources to back them up (form legitimate creators of the source).
Output: Fact
topic: The Debates here are about who's the best BSer rather than about real facts
sentence: which would suggest that the debates here are essentially efficient plagiarizing as opposed to being   "all about who the best BS artist is".
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: 
  
Hello, welcome to my debate.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: 
  
I am sorry for not debating right.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: "I think Christianity is looked down upon by Atheists because too many Christians belief in God only because of faith."
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Atheists are very fact and logic oriented people.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Atheists won't buy into it because they are looking for a logical explanation as to why they all are here.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Contention 1: Christians without knowledge  
  
If you look at my first video, you will see what I'm talking about.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Contention 2: Personal Experience with Most Christians  
  
The area I live in is a densely Christian area.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Contention 3: Atheists' Opinions of Christians  
  
My second video pokes fun at religion through comedy.
Output: Fact
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Either Christianity is looked down upon because of Christian conduct or it is not.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Good luck to my opponent!
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: However, if Christians prove their religion is true factually and logically, then there will be a lot of Atheists who "see the light" and convert.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: I explained that most Christians don't give proof of the existence of God and Jesus Christ in all three of my contentions.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: I feel so dumb.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: I have a learning disability so it takes a while to memorize things.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: I have showed why his 2nd round argument is false by pointing out exactly where I said everything that he claimed I didn't say.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: I used to bully in the name of religion, and that is my biggest regret.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: In conclusion:  
  
My opponent has not fulfilled his requirements for his 2nd round argument due to the fact that he responded to me, which I said wasn't allowed.
Output: Fact
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: In that video, there were Christians that believed in God only because of faith.
Output: Fact
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: May God have mercy on me.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Please forgive if I come across rude.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Since most Christians don't have proof for the existence of God or Jesus Christ, Atheists look at the idea of Christianity as a fairytale rather than a theory with potential to be true.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: The fact is, most of the things said in the video sound like a fairytale.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: The highlights of this video include a woman claiming to be a "FOOL for Christ", a man that attempts to heal someone over the phone and fails (as well as making ridiculous screams), several politicians that make nonsense claims, and two men who use a banana to try to prove the existence of God.
Output: Fact
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Therefore, if Christians can't prove the Christian theories to be true, then no Atheists would be willing to convert.
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: They tell me "No, I can't prove it, but there's proof out there.
Output: Testimony
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: Titled "Crazy Christian Nonsense", it is exactly that, NONSENSE!
Output: Value
topic: The Reason why Christianity is Looked Down Upon...
sentence: You cannot have it both ways.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: 
  
Both the USA and the PROC are terms for NATIONS-- involuntary groupings of people based on whether they live in territory under a given government's jurisdiction.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: "Again, the United re sending representatives of the U.S.A to these talks, and the way in which every citizen contributes is through taxation for the bill involved.  
"
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: "the people" can have no literal meaning but "the totality of people."
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: .
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: And one cannot attend it via sending representatives.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: Context is the key to this.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: Debating resolutions, on the other hand, require high precision."
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: Entering peace talks, unlike "entering a war," does imply personal talking, and the media's usage is simply incorrect on this account or at best imprecise.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: However, consider the following sentences:  
  
'The United States went to war (war in this case meaning an armed conflict) with Iraq'  
  
'The United States has entered peace talks with North Korea'  
  
In the first sentence, it doesn't imply every American citizen was armed and sent to Iraq to fight, nor does it imply every Iraqi citizen was armed to fight against the incoming Americans.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: If somehow speakers that could reach that many people were invented, those closest to the stage would be deafened.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: In order for the statement "The USA went here" or "The PROC went here" to make sense, the entire population of the country has to go there.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: In this case, it's kill people.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: In this context, representatives of the United States (Namely soldiers and the government) were at war with Iraq.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: It means that someone who holds your allegiance is.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: It would certainly be a mans night out and give the two nations a chance to reconcile with each other.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: Majorities are irrelevant.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: Neither is the case.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: So, these resolution implies that both States (PROC and USA) should attend the War concert, however as they are not animate objects, they must indeed send representatives, such as Hu Jintao or Bill Clinton.
Output: Policy
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: That does not further your case.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: The United States was not angry about the election outcome.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: The citizens of a state elect representatives to government.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: The estimated combined population of the two nations is over 1 billion, 600 million.
Output: Fact
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: The proposal to send a few individual politicians to a concert is irrelevant to the resolution, as it is insufficient to amount to the attendance of the nations.
Output: Value
topic: The United States of America should go to War with China
sentence: They do not, however, teleport you to a concert venue.
Output: Fact
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: 
  
I will refute first your arguments, then move on to a rebuilding of mine own.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: Descartes objectivity has come into question, so i dont even believe your resources are credible.
Output: Testimony
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: Existence extends only to that which I percieve.
Output: Fact
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: I agree, there is no higher being.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: I never stated that existence was universal.
Output: Testimony
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: I simply assumed that you exist and many like you exist.
Output: Testimony
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: I would submit, that we are simply embodiments of a higher consciousness, or energy/energy level.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: It doesn't matter how I exist.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: Lastly, assuming you exist, you know I exist in some form (no matter how small) because you are recieving input on your computer screen from me.
Output: Fact
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: Our consciousnesses are what they are, which is to say that we exist because we percieve.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: The fact that all humans think in the same manner is a level of connectivity that surpasses perceptions or experiences.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: We assume that we, or moreover, our conscious exists, because that is how our interactions are on a daily basis.
Output: Fact
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: You've lost that argument because even if I am some part of a higher force I still exist as that part.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: by saying we instantize (i warn, i make up words), we are simply proving the existence of the higher energy or force
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: thinking must not be the basis of existence only that which exists must be the basis, therefore i argue my definition in superiority.
Output: Value
topic: The only thing we can be certain of is our existence.
sentence: what there is is a higher force.
Output: Value
topic: The ontological argument
sentence: 4) God is not natural.
Output: Value
topic: The ontological argument
sentence: I make the following argument with the utmost respect for Pro and his beliefs:  
  1) Santa Clause’s existence is either logically impossible or logically necessary.
Output: Value
topic: The ontological argument
sentence: One can easily say that God is logically possible but may not exist.
Output: Value
topic: The ontological argument
sentence: The resolution is negated.
Output: Fact
topic: The ontological argument
sentence: There is no dispute over premise 2 that God is logically possible.
Output: Fact
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: 
  
"smallest" is a relative term.
Output: Fact
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: 
  
A smallest distance would be a shortest distance.
Output: Fact
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: 
  
You are correct and indeed I intended to make that in the comment section but was half asleep at the time.
Output: Testimony
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: Perhaps I'll make the challenge again sometime, so I can get an opponent.
Output: Testimony
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: Smallest is descriptive enough.
Output: Value
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: Take a chair, in a room, for example.
Output: Fact
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: That said, I guess I'll wait for an opponent.
Output: Testimony
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: The insult wasn't necessary.
Output: Value
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: Well...no kidding.
Output: Value
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: You are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole with this one.
Output: Value
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: You can't halve zero, and at some point in measure we reach zero.
Output: Fact
topic: There is a smallest distance
sentence: You probably should have clarified your misunderstandings via a comment, rather than simply taking the debate.
Output: Policy
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: 
  
Thank you for creating this debate.
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: (Ie: Law, Medicine, Business, etc) It depends upon the field, as to whether one should attend college or university.
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: (Ie: Law, Medicine, Business, etc) It depends upon the field, as to whether one should attend college or university."
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: Appreciation of information is not a requirement to gain satisfaction from it and whether or not someone appreciates information does not affect its overall quality and usefulness.]
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: As an example, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a great place to get a degree in engineering, but so is the University of Michigan [1].
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: Depending on the discipline in which one is interested in gaining a degree, university is an invaluable resource.
Output: Value
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: Furthermore, she asserts that university bound students don't necessarily even need to go to university because without a four year degree they would still make the same amount of money and be as successful because they have already developed a strong work ethic and other related traits.
Output: Fact
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: However, this has been disproved by April Norhanian, a former college recruiter.
Output: Fact
topic: University isn't useful compared to college as it is merely theoretical rather than practical
sentence: I also ask my opponent to explain his view that buying beer for a party is a worrisome activity.]
Output: Fact