niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Comment: Any one surprised to find out that a British company is behind the spewing of anti white and especially anti Boer hatred? A deeper look is needed because I bet if you dig deep enough you will find the British government behind it, the fact that one of the people involved in this anti white smear campaign is also Tony Blair's agent. #bellpotingermustfall  #britishgovermentmustfall
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Your column is nasty and churlish.  Rob Ford worked hard for his constituents before he succumbed to addictions.   If it was anyone else, you would be sympathetic and understanding.   He deserves to be recognized.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Your argument is that because the women did not have a choice to have sex and was raped that  it is morally justifiable to murder the child?  The women did not have a choice so the child does not have a choice?  

Explain to me the logic of murdering an innocent child based on the crime of its father.

Wouldn't it be better to punish the rapist?

Even if I could grant that abortion is morally justifiable in cases of rape, that does not mean it is morally justifiable outside of these extreme examples liberals love to come up with and act like that is the norm.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Good riddance and take your butt with you.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I tried to tell anyone in Eugene that would listen  she is the real deal. Considering her age she is just coming into her own as quite possibly the best female long distance runner ever. I only hope so. Good luck in the finals Allie kick some ass!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: If you are referring to Lewinsky she was not molested. The sex was consensual.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: LW1: Let's see, you shack up with a woman for 7 years with no commitment. Then you lust after her daughter and try to justify potentially having sex with daughter by saying you "wouldn't be breaking any laws"? You're quite despicable. Do your girlfriend and her daughter an favor and leave.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Their is no middle ground where the flag can be respected and civil rights can also be respected?"

It's my way or Hitler's?

That is a true zealot's position.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: How is it that the government thinks it is okay to have private dinners with lobbyists (of any sort)? however especially the ones that have been ruining the whole countrie's real estate and creating poverty and housing crises for Canadians?

Because they only invest in order to import more Chinese nationals for a pyramid scheme, and money launder real estate like a ponzi, not including create shadow businesses to profit creating jobs that Chinese nationals pay a fee for -to enter Canada (TFW program) - and then loan shark our governments plus export/import illegal / banned items.

Unbelievable. Chinese lobbyists in fact need to be banned from every political party in Canada. Many still need to be deported for massive immigration and tax fraud.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: You're probably right re the impact.  But the entire thing smacks of Catholic authoritarianism.  It's also all so ridiculous -- as your proposed ads show.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Given the number of cheap shots that are aimed against Christians with total impuniy and in view of the clear complicity of the media's 'monitors' in this regard, there is an obvious need for a Parliamentary motion to condemn Christianophobia.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Anyone who thinks that two men or two women masturbating, sodomizing, or fellating one another constitutes "marriage," and calls himself a "Catholic," is living in a web of fantasy too deep and dense to be unraveled by any natural means.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The cause is the same thing that causes men to snore.  Their balls slowly hang down and cover their asshole and they become vaporlocked!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Another christian tempted by the prospect of sex with other men....

must.  stop.  gaysex.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Most of us voted for Trump to make a statement against both the worthless Democrates and Republicans parties. Both have sold us out
Trump wasn't helped by the Reublicans and if the Democrates/ Republicans don't get their heads out of their asses, there's going to be a 3rd party and no more Republicans or Democrates.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Typical businessman spin.  Downplay the loss; emphasis the gains.  However, that doesn't work so well in politics especially when the gains are intangible like "enemy intel" which we'll get no quantitative value for compared to the clear cost of the death of an American serviceman.  Well it doesn't work so well if your head isn't cluttered with campaign buzzwords and slogans...
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: That's unfortunate, Mr. McCrea, because God blessed you with the gift of being able to unite with the female of our species and create new life, and you're wasting it on recreational use of your sex organs with some guy.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Only 7 countries are on the list...not a total ban on all Muslim, and this is a temporary ban of four months so the gov't can find a better way to vet people from these countries. The MSM is trying to stir things up again. The most dangerous group in the USA has to be the MSM.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This is the kind of crap authoritarian dictatorships do to place doubt and fear into the people. They will lie distort or use "alternate facts" to get you to believe they and they only are right and the only one who can "protect" you. They'll tell you the press is wrong and will try to control what they say. They will try to suppress open criticism of their regime and punish those who do. We are witnessing modern day fascism taking over America.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Trump won and Hillary lost. 
NeverTrumps who are desperate to point out how "unpopular " Trump is are as pathetic as Hillary--actually worse, because they should know better. I stopped respecting some of my favorite podcasts when they went on about how any other GOP candidate would have beaten her more easily.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Must suck to be him to have to worry about a rogue boner popping up uncontrollably. What a laugh. Lawyers will think of anything to introduce doubt. The court recorder mustʻve had a tough time keeping a straight face. hahaha
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: this author never says there are "many fine people" among the Nazis and white supremacists. And the author was not forced to condemn bigotry, unlike the president who mouthed the words but clearly didn't mean it based on all his other comments, never mind his years of racist birtherism and winks at bigots
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I know, right?? Most of us figured it out at the "Grab 'em by the pu$$y" comment.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: 100% duty on milk products from US.   Softwood and dairy are not covered under NAFTA.  For 30 years the US has been playing this game with softwood.   Time to hit back.    100% tariff on dairy will have the US farmers up in arms and Trump will back down.  He is a bully and he is dumb.  He will back down rather quickly.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Don't let the door hit you in the ass!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: If that's true why aren't you attacking companies more? I agree with you in principle. However China, America, Japan and the EU and virtually every other industrialized country heavily subsidizes their corporations. If Canada and the provinces don't we are suckers. Why do you think so many autoworkers are now in the South? Massive state tax subsidies.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Your party obviously has no idea what they are. Miley Cyrus grabs her own vagina in front of millions of little girls and makes videos watched by tens of millions more little girls. Happy hippie though so it's ok. You hypocrite! Not to mention the disaster that lady gag me is. But it's ok because they are on your side. You libs need to grow up, move on and do better next time. Or be idiots and stay out of power.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Congrats to the Rangers, who outplayed Montreal, including goaltender play.

My wish now is that Nashville wins the Cup and PK brings it Montreal so he can shove it up Bergevin's ass.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Yeah, but the real anology, is that  you borrow about 10% of a business start-up, and then have to pay 20% of all SALES ( not profits ) for 34 years, for that 10%.

No business would be this dumb.
In many ways, she is acting like trump with China.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Still fantasizing about gay sex and male genitalia, are you? And what does that have to do with your community-vermin, disease-ridden, pestilent cats? Other than that's the only kind of lap-gratification that you'll ever get in life.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: No matter how much the MP's in power  or want-to-be earn per year with taxpayers' money there are still blood suckers among them.  They can't pay for their own vacation as taxpayers do! They should then all be paid at least a MILLION TAX FREE!!!!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Y'all pull your head out of your ass. Transgender women are not going to hurt you or your children. It's just yur ignorance about other people that puts fear into yur thick skulls. Yur just pissed off cuz you lost the LBGT fight in the supreme court. It's the transgender girls that need protection from you.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Charles: Ok grabbing by the pussy is OK with you. How about the other 212 Trump lies with extraordinary negative impacts? None of those dampen your support for the greatest con man?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Vote Democrat ?
Because individual liberty is so over rated?
 Because we are better off as slaves to the state ?
 Because we are viewed as to stupid to run our own lives ?
 Please explain to me why we should not be free ?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: AS Mr Garrett said" Just because you want to be tolerant, doesn't mean you have to be stupid too".
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: He will be incarcerated, with most likely, the inmates that he had arrested in the past.

Law Enforcement Officers, are treated lower in the prison hierarchy, than sex offenders.

He committed sex crimes.  He now has 2 great, prison hierarchy offenses.

He is a cop, who committed a sex crime.

He will suffer immensely, for the duration of his prison time.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: exactly hence cholo's common sense solution. have a penis? you go to the restroom for penises and likewise for vaginas. no debate and no need to identify being a man or woman. simply go to the restroom with what you've got. got it? what's to argue about? well cholo is pretty sure someone will come up with something but only to stir up more trouble.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I understand. The nazis are being exposed once and for all. We are seeing who is for equality for all citizens and who are the white supremacists who post comments with trash like, "how about a black state? Would this make the black race happy?"

Perish the thought that you would view black Americans as equal citizens, dude. It's  been 400 years. Isn't it about time you gave up your divisive anti-black bigotry and your white supremacy?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Colin doesnt appear to want a job. Should he, he would remove his head from his rectum.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Come sit on a grand jury in Bethel - hub of the area with the greatest sexual violence in Alaska, which is saying something - and you'll see exactly who the victims are. And the rapists.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Women don't have testicles. If someone harshly disagrees with science, they should not read opinions on news sites.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Well, men have their testicles and prostate examined, don't they?  But the women should have the right to request a female doctor.  Also, how in depth does a vaginal exam have to be to get approved for duty?  Is there something in there that gets in the way of their job?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I see things a little differently: If it is not happening through our hands, our love, our convictions, our words, our outrage, then it is not happening, cosmically or otherwise.

Elsewhere in the news we are told that a massive garbage dump in Sri Lanka slid down upon the homes of hundreds of people and disappeared or killed a large number of them. The government was going to move the dump "soon."

So how can there be hope in a god who will soon  move the garbage of indifference and greed, and neighbours who think the life of faith is about being nice while we wait?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: If you go to a music festival and drunkenly dance around in a fake "Indian headdress" or something like that, I get it -- it's a fool of a thing to do.  But shouldn't artists try to explore other cultures?  Don't we all become richer for it?  Should white kids not play jazz or blues?  There's a world of difference between dumb, thoughtless appropriation and images like Chief Wahoo and genuine, open-minded attempts to build bridges. I think Northrop Frye said something about art allowing us to explore other possible lives, and that doing so made us more tolerant and educated.  Apparently, Frye is just another evil "settler".  Maybe his books should be banned.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: So in your mind, the answer to sex abuse is MORE sexual abuse?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: still lots of boobs though
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I fail to understand how calling God "hir" insults trans people.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I used to think the people that continue to support this dimwit were brainless or at least extremely impaired. But now I see they are actually intellectual powerhouses! 
The mental gymnastics these people have to jump through on any given day/topic is mind boggling. Think about the amount of brain power that these people must produce to justify their thinking. Can't understand why we need gun in school for grizzly? Maybe your minuscule brain couldn't hurdle over the obstacle we like to call 'fact'. 
Personally I am jealous. I don't think I will ever have the ability to understand how Obama managed to destroy the economy a year before entering office. Or what the difference is between a full swamp and a drained one.
I guess my tiny little mind will forever be burdened by facts and I will never understand how basic welfare programs are destroying the country or how trickle down economics will solve poverty.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: And you're a dycque.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: only every other country are[sic] allowed "keep their lands". 

I'm usually hesitant to use this line of argument, but this is such a blatant demonstration of ignorance. Hello - Canada took the land from someone else before it became "yours". If you're the kettle, don't call the pot black.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "Sodomites"; such an antiquated phrase. I hope this means that you've never done oral sex; that too is considered sodomy. Not sorry to inform you though that the closet door is open for good.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: So you walk around in oublic with one breast hanging out? Fascinating...
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: You speak for your wife, do you? I guess you white Christian men know how to keep them under control, no burkas required!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I am a strong anti-fluoride advocate (what kind of idiot isn't? It's literally unrefined toxic waste), and I was active in the effort to remove fluoride from the drinking water. 

It was 100% a local and grass-roots effort.

At no point did any anti-fluoride advocate or commit any act of violence or vandalism. At no point were their demands unreasonable: honor the LANDSLIDE advisory vote against fluoridation. 

The 2nd Class City measure, as far as I understand it, was a final straw. That is what it took to get this City Council to honor YOUR wishes, and to get the unrefined toxic waste (which definitely contains arsenic and lead as well) out of YOUR water. 

So you're welcome. Feel free to take your complaints to the City Council.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Hey Elway, give Kaepernick a shot, what have are you afraid of, you pussy ass!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Enough with the snarky bullying comments!  If you have a point to make in response to a posting, why don't you make it?  Instead, you just post a comment that appears to be nothing but an attempt to troll.  Perhaps it is time for the CC to get involved, again?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "Penetration testing". Yeah, sounds like a rape defense.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: It requires a special kind of stupid to vote for people such as these.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Fully agree, as I replied to someone else just a bit ago. The pill is essential because male condom use is hard to control. Guys don't use such things if they can get away with not doing so, but that penis is not going into their body. The person being entered has absolute authority to make that call. Not the man, not the Church. Indeed, it bespeaks the flaws in the Church that there are no ordained women controlling these teachings, but the irony escapes most of those dolts and when it does not, it is all the more evil.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Don't you find in more than just ironic that it would be President Trump, who has used media coverage to slander an uncountable number of his perceived foes, would be the one questioning a free press ruling that he apparently believes slanders him?    Seriously, you see this don't you?

I've known people of similar character, quick to inflict pain on others, emotional or physical.   It seemed to come from extreme arrogance, or extreme insecurity.  I don't know the President, but his power, combined with his failure to recognize, or care, about the pain his comments make, worries me.
=========
When I make a false statement and it is corrected by something other than uniformed opinion, I appreciate it.   I would rather know the truth than believe in a lie even if it  feels like humiliation.   

We are all liars, some by intention, some by ignorance, some for  love/protection,  some out of hate.  KNOWING that I look for context or motive, but that's just me.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: NO ACA ?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: JUST REMOVE the DOG PENIS FROM HER MOUTH and GIVE IT TO BARRY the MUSLUM BACK DOOR BOY
THEM PROGRESSIVES LOVE SEX WITH DOGS--NIGERS and MONKEYS
LITTLE BLAK BARRY PROVED HIS SLUT MAMMY HAD SEX WITH DOGS and MONKEYS
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The desperate link dump, a classic time waster technique. Those links don't support your wild-arse claims and you know it.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Thanks ass clown for stealing my profile on FB.  Time to give it up boi
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Well, I think if I ever lose my job I'll just go out and commit a bunch of petty crimes, then insult the arresting officer's mother until he works me over something awful and then retire.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Dear, we don't "questions, disparages, and undermines your equality as a citizen and your legitimacy as a human being"

We simply say that the penis is the male sex organ. If you find science offensive, I don't know what to tell you.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Creative visualization perhaps. Hopefully Donald will soon have prostate problems. I doubt he actually gets much even from his wife, that poor immigrant. Can you even imagine the indignity?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "... was a boxer in his home country of Guatemala" Pretty much sums it up..WTF was he doing here?
Are we granting H1B's to Boxer's? No I think not  just another "Undocumented Democrat"!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This is for those who are laughing at this post. Hope you don't have a beloved female who is in an arms reach of a f----nkg pervert who thinks that there is nothing wrong with violating a women's sacred place. Any man who thinks that he has a right to grab a women's c--t is a sick f--k and should be hung by his ba ⚾️⚽️s. God help you sickos that think all of this sick sh-- is ok.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Gov Walker should be ashamed of the way he's dealt with legislators. 

His one and only consistent strategy is to pit people against their legislators. That's the mark of a 'leader' of the lowest order, if Walker can even be called a leader.  

As long as Walker takes his cues from his cos Whitaker, a disgruntled and failed former legislator who seems hell bent on exacting revenge on his former colleagues, and his comm. dir. Jang, who is clueless, he will continue to fail...and take us along with him.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Why feel sorry for Slick Willy?

He has gotten all the free, extramarital [P word] he ever wanted and with the benign approval of his nominal “wife” who cleaned up after him.

Now with no more elections to win, Slick can indulge himself to his heart’s content - - for example on his pal’s “Lolita Express” aircraft enroute to “Orgy Island” where he can schtup little pre-pubescent teeny boppers in an effort to use this fantasy to recapture his youth that is now gone a glimmering. 

Perhaps when he expires he can be buried in a giant condom instead of a coffin.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: If it has penis he is boy, if it has clitoris she is girl.  Simple
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Mark it took a 3/4 vote to tap the CBR whats to say they can't over rule the veto  get real! Besides your the reason the whole damn thing is an issue!  Did Nancy P clue you in on its failure before our deciding Vote to create this mess. The King has no clothes Stupid
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This is one of those topics no one wants to touch.  If you say "hold on a second, sometimes they are drunk (not passed out), consent and are happy to consent, but afterwards regret it: then they were sexually assaulted"...now you get bashed for "supporting sexual victimization."  And if you flat out support it, well what about the other shoe: "both Mike and Jill were drunk.  Mike and Jill had sex.  Jill was drunk: so Mike sexually assaulted her."  Well...Mike was drunk also...so couldn't it be that Jill assaulted him??  Why is it only one way.

I've personally seen on the UAF campus a woman claim she was raped after she had sex with a male.  Multiple times even.  But the male student wasn't interested in dating, and after she realized this she was overheard saying she was "raped" for their sexual encounters.  How do situations like this play into that "1 in 9"?  Just curious as there are some serious lines that could be blurred in some of the answers.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Overpraising dads? To become a dad one literally just has to put their penis in a vagina. That's it. It requires no special skills or abiliities at all. I don't know anyone who has ever treated a man with praise for that "accomplishment".
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Race to replace inefficient and skill less people.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Go suck an egg, Gordon.  Preening and false moral peacocking, like what you're doing, is the problem.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: There is something seriously wrong with the youth of Alaska maybe it has something to do with the gigantic a gun culture that you have in Alaska and there is no requirement to carry a concealed weapon so basically any idiot has a gun on them at any time that's not good
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Damn I wish I'd know you when you worked for the State so I could have fired your ignorant, insolent ass.   Now, lefties, tell me I'm not civil to her.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Suck it Omie
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I dont have too much criticism for the "so called" President on taking the action he did. However, this article presupposes this man actually has "policies" . In my view he does not...he flies by the seat of his pants, and is vapid of intellect.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: You’re here & you ask is there no end to the shame?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: she's got more balls than Sullivan ever will.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Let us hope that the so-called "two party system" (which is really just one party with two nearly indistinguishable wings) is finally dead!  I will break open a bottle of champagne and then pee on its grave on that glorious day.

Ever since I was a child, I have been struck by the hypocrisy and insanity of the so-called "two party" system.  Where else in modern life are we automatically stuck with having to repeatedly make a decision between two, and ALWAYS only two, almost equally repellent choices?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: You are such a negative jerk, Kizla. Millsap is universally rated as one of the top 6 or so free agents, including such names as Durant and Curry. But in your negative world, the Nuggets are simply trying to save face by signing one of the premier players on the market, a player that happens to fit one of their key needs. On 6/24, you wrote another critical (as always) column, "Why should Chris Paul and Paul Millsap take the Nuggets seriously as a free agent destination?" Now one of them apparently is doing exactly that, and of course you, Mr. Kizla, turn that into a negative as well. Whatever, Kizla. You are just a hater.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yes, because conservatives in 2012 wanted a candidate who had launched the prototype of Obamacare in Massachusetts. Of course, we're all stupid and will just vote for anyone!

If the Republicans want my vote, they need to run a REAL conservative -- which is not Mittens Romney or the Donald or John McCain. That leaves a lot of candidates, none of whom will be the nominee.

I'm voting 3rd party this year because neither of the two major parties could find a good candidate if their existence depended on it ... which is exactly the point of voting 3rd party. It's time for a change, folks. Join me in the rebellion!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The only way he could know for sure would be if he had sex with them himself...
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Agreed.  But that's grade 12's.  I think teaching a 5/6-year-olds about gender identity (a girl can have a penis etc... ) is a little silly.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: You bet it is!  This 3rd wife porn model takes the office of "First Lady" to a new low!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: And don't forget, nearly EVERY hand you have ever shook has touched a penis! GASP!
Worried about bacteria? Wash your hands, wash your bags; it's not that hard, dude.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: You would not believe it; however, I was in the Church.
I used to go to church attending morning mass before I go to work, go to church at lunch hour doing silent prayer and went to church after work to attend the evening mass regarding it as attending a vesper.  I used to go to the Eucharistic adoration chapel every day, counted time to make sure that I spend at least 2&1/2 hours before our Lord thinking that I will give our Lord 10 % of my day.  That is until the clergy sex abuse scandal hit our archdiocese.  
  
Now I can't even enter Catholic church because it presents the sexual impurity, and entire CI clergies participation actively or inactively in sexual rape of children are portraying hell to me.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: It is pretty easy to common-sense check your first sentence. How would the restaurant react if a woman was in the women's restroom, naked and lathering herself with soap? This isn't the gym. They would toss her out. And if she had previously gone around propositioning customers for sex and then was found in the bathroom, the police would have gotten involved. The gender-bathroom issue is a distraction.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Total nonsense.  Just keep drinking that kool-aid, Rod!   

China is by far the world's largest C emitter, with its value growing linearly since 2000.  New coal plants continue to come online, air in the country is infamously unbreathable.  Reported emissions not worth the paper they are printed on (even though they are already horrible), as NYT uncovered they under-reported coal burning by 17%.  That 17% alone, Rod, is more C than Canada emits in a year.  

The huge 'agreement' by the USA and China is also worthless.  China never set a cap on its emissions, only that they would level off by 2030.  Say  what?  It's like Trudeau promising to balance the budget...someday.  

And don't give me the per capita argument.  Their per capita emissions are at or above the EU's mean.  So individual Chinese emit more C than the typical European.  And it's growing.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I don't know what was not reported; the story does not indicate that intercourse actually took place.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: There is no need for books in a library, as today these buildings only serve as a place for homeless people to sleep, defecate and access pornography.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Perhaps if we deal with drug addiction as a mental & physical illness instead of criminal activity, the addicts will not waste our $$$ or their time being incarcerated instead of rehabilitated; other nations found this quite effective.  But as you know, the private prison lobby is quite powerful and has many key legislators in their pocket. 
If you really wish to find the gateway drug, its alcohol.  Its much more readily available and has been well documented to be a truly addictive drug.  
Hopefully you will see the medical benefits of marijuana.
"When followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity." (1992 opinion on US v Lee 1982).  This forum isn't conducive to lengthy discussion; Scalia obviously shifted crazy right after this.  You couldn't find this in your search???
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Well, now, up until the last sentence I was willing to consider your point of view.  But you had to inject a racist comment, and that invalidated your entire post as far as I'm concerned. Yes, people who denigrate whites are just as racist as those who commit racial slurs against blacks or Latinos or other people of color.  It is apparent that you don't like whites in Langley ("that is a shame").  So, Mstraub, to you I say:  suck it up, cupcake and soldier on, we're here to stay.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: <<Isn’t it behavior — not self-perception — that objectively defines one’s sexual orientation?>>

Absolutely not. Your quotation from John Jay (JJ) correctly asserts the exact opposite. Think about the prevalence of gay rape among straight prisoners. "Opportunity" is important.

Null, it is critical to distinguish pedophilia from ephebophilia among clerical abusers. We now know pedophilia is intractable, but ephebophilia behavior is more complex. Most non-pedophile sexual abusers, whether gay or straight, are best understood as sexually immature, sexually confused, sexually repressed, with "opportunity" for young boys. 

It is not homosexuality or heterosexuality that correlates, IMHO, with the selection of illegal targets, but immaturity, etc. 

BTW, I was unaware JJ estimated 5% to 50% gay clergy. IMHO, globally the correct figure today is minimally 50%, and perhaps as high as 75%. Reliable data is virtually impossible given the ongoing preference for the closet among priests.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: OMG! Ha Ha Ha now that is funny..." Second, let’s not be naive in thinking the sky is falling;" Try telling that one to the Democrats and their "Pink Pussy Hat" drama queens.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I don't agree with them either...but I think you went over the top with "sexual sadism"
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: "You obviously did not pay attention to the most important aspect of "Spotlight": that it was the parents, the law enforcement, the press, et al, that did all that they could to keep the cases out of courts AND the public eye....the bishops simply cooperated with their wishes. "

Either you have read almost nothing about these issues or you are intentionally attempting to mislead people on NCR. Unfortunately, the latter is more likely.

Bishops and Cardinals did NOT simply cooperated with other people's wishes. Bishops and Cardinals obeyed (and most of them are still obeying) Church Law orders to cover up clergy pedophilia crimes.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: “It creates uncertainty … because at any point the rules can change,” Mr. Pearson said. 
Hmmm. The only reason the Bill was introduced was because Air Miles CHANGED THE RULES OF THE GAME BY TRYING TO EXPIRE MILES.
Oh, the hypocrisy.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Always some smarmy, ignorant rebuttal.  You poor thing, you don't seem able to reason beyond the end of your nose. Given your regard for truth, why would anyone with integrity pay attention to you?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "Santa Barbara feel." You mean walkable, well kept sidewalks. Livable, nice even. Not the dumping ground for homeless drug addicts and prostitutes that it looks like now. The Ammo Can has enough parking. I never see that lot full. I do see all the snow from that lot pushed in the way of any one on a bike or walking.

People in Anchorage need to get off their butts and walk to a business. Their doctors will be happier, and they will be healthier.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Ryan is a cheep shot artist not a reporter always looking for the race angle. Disgusting.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: U 
Like
Sucking
Black
C
O
C
K
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Bill C-22 was a dangerous bill which the Liberals should not have supported in the first place.   Since they did, and since they said they would modify this bill for transparency and oversight, these measures are simply NOT good enough.

During Bill C-22 introduction, Many posted (including me) that it is dangerous because it would allow a Govt to spy on whomever it wished without adequate oversight.   CPC Partisans, like Joe Dick below, mocked anybody who voiced these concerns even when it was pointed out that these same powers could be used AGAINST even the CPC when they lost power.    It simply gives the Govt too much power regardless of party.

Citizens of all political stripes, even hopeless partisans like Joe Dick, need to let their MP know that these measure are not enough.    It's a shame that it took an election loss for CPC partisans like Joe Dick (and millions like him) to realize that mindlessly cheering a CPC Bill and mocking those who were against it was a mistake.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: It's already way past time for Catholic bishops to get out of the business of extracting  lifelong promises of clerical celibacy.  Deacons and priests should never be treated as sexual pawns or sexual slaves -- which is that's been going on for a long time already!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: You do realize that the BC Liberals aren't "Liberal at all. They are Reform/Social Credit. They hired a bunch of former Harperites to run the campaign ... they also had WAC Bennett's grandson on the bus with Christy during the whole campaign.

Another example of the phony crock that is the BC Fiberals. They can't even represent themselves via a proper namesake. Why people vote for their corrupt ways is anybody's guess. Maybe now they can take out the big money from these campaigns. These phony Liberals would be lost without that.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: We should all learn the "Shahada" 

There is one god. Allah is God. Mohammad is the profit of god. 

it may be the only thing to save your life when the population tilts just enough for ethnic cleansing to start.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Theoretically? It's been done 27 times. Your simple text is an example of something that should not be an amendment; it's too simple. What, sex you've had, sex you want, sex you watch? There are plenty of laws protecting discrimination due to gender. Not everything requires the Constitution to be amended, that's what legislation is for.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Why?  Because you are a hypocrite. Sun TV was part of Canada's culture too but I am sure you would scream the loudest if they got so much as a dime of your tax dollars.  What you really want, but won't say, is that you want more money for yourself and your friends.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Talk about lack of oversight! I am almost sure that this person won't be facing any real jail time. After all, its a white collar crime, eh?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Quite frankly - the Ukraine ( so called ) is a corrupt civil war mess. The Crimea is a separate issue - a Russian naval base included. Half way around the globe it is within Russia's sphere of influence - get over it. It is a coherent "country / nation" only on maps drawn by the West .....
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Name and shame.
Perhaps that's the best justice we have available.
Name and shame these sociopaths.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This protest was as clear as Clinton's campaign.....

what was it about again? Oh ya, we are women hear us complain. 

Perhaps that's one of the reasons Clinton lost, no clear message, just, I am a woman and that should be enough. 

Lets go boys, put on your penis hats and penis signs and lets tell the world we are men.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: They will regret this decision.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Sean Spicer is a nasty piece of work.
Only Quality people attract quality people, it's why there's so many bullies and nasty people in the Trump Administration.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The unmarried men who push the idea that contraception is immoral are in a tradition that said "sex is nasty". Augustine wrote that intercourse between a husband and wife was sinful, unless it was expressly with the intent to procreate. To him, and to many of the Church fathers, and the celibate churchmen who followed him, sex had to be "justified". You can't just have it because it's fun or because it makes you feel closer to your spouse. 

BTW, that's the main argument for the perpetual virginity of Mary: Sex is sinful, so the sinless Mary didn't engage in it. 

So, they said that "natural law" says that the proper reason for sex is procreation, and sex must be "open" to it.  That is the background to Humanae Vitae, vastly simplified.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Due process was provided when they were considered disabled and eligible for SSI.  It was further provided when they were adjudged to require a cxonservator.  If you wish to address "due Process", let's do look at "felons."  Do you think it's reasonable to apply the standard to exclude a person convicted of tax evasion from purchasing or owning a firearm as applied to someone convicted of armed robbery or attempted murder?  The ineligibility for firearm ownership was determined by "status" and, in the case of felons, that's a very broad status.  Felons can "recover' their Second Amendment Rights, but it requires legal action on their part to do so. 

 Frankly, I would suggest those severely mentally-ill individuals who were excluded by the Obama Order were more of a danger than most felons.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Since this is your view of protests, I assume you also find the annual March for Life to be a foolish waste of time, mere "emoting" that solves no actual problem?  I will await your comments come January...
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: More white man's guilt I see, Elizabeth. What a dreadful column. I'm not a big flag waver and have no interest in being forced to party just because Heritage Canada says I should but this loathing has to stop. Canada, as we know it, is 150 years old. End of story.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This is one of the all time great comedy articles and comments/posts on the G&M. Not a single person, including the author, has any first, or even second hand knowledge of what really happened.

The Russian government has it's own self serving version of what happened. Bill Browder is a proven liar and con man, with a political agenda to push and his own dirty tracks to cover. I am certain he has his own reasons for not wanting to come to Canada/US, since he will again be deposed in several active lawsuits against him. Why does he never want the truth to come out in sworn testimony court?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I wish all of these easily offended snowflakes would just go back to bed and stay there. Let the rest of us live in the real world and go about our business.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: How long did it take you to spell that word? Can't write a full sentence can you?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I agree that "Hawaiian" should be considered a nationality of a bygone kingdom which was established by illegal, violent force of vicious warlords who never put anything up to a vote or asked for international recognition.  Furthermore, the original Marquesan settlers of these islands are the Kanaka Maoli (or whatever is Marquesan for original people).  We could keep turning back the clock to various points in time (though OHA and others only want to look at the fancy Iolani Palace days when a revolution led to our becoming the 50th State.  I say let's look forward as Americans who enjoy rights and wealth that neither the original Marquesan settlers nor the later Tahitian conquerors (today's part-Hawaiians) could never have dreamed about.  The only way that OHA or any of these phony baloney "Hawaiian Kingdoms" have any hope of prevailing in subverting our statehood for either of their nutty agenda is by force.  I don't see that happening.  But, FYI, I'll be defending statehood.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Please tell us your post is farce. It's so believable, it's either really great farce or completely asinine, if you're trying to be serious.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I’m afraid we now have to restore all those medals taken away from the Soviet era “women" athletes who had balls.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I think they see the writing on the wall; look at that group, there is only one lying pussy grabber in that whole bunch
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: You bet.  Send me a nude photo of you and then we can negotiate.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: "Where is your outrage over Bill's 40 reported rapes of women and children? This man has made 27 trips to pedophile island to have sex with children and nobody on the left could care less"

So this is how you slander and demean Bill Clinton? Your obsession to link him and HRC with anything sick and disgusting, is sick and disgusting. You really bring out the worst in yourself when you repost the sludge found on extremist websites.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Uneven?  Anyone who watched his interview yesterday about the healthcare vote could see a cognitive meltdown in progress.  Trump, yesterday, said that Republicans had all the votes needed to repeal the ACA (a flat out lie) but said the vote needed to be delayed because of a hospitalized senator who he was unable to name.  There is no senator in the hospital, and the vote had already been abandoned.

Something is obviously wrong with the president's mind.  His constant lying about every subject may be just because he continues to be the compulsive, pathological liar he has been his entire life, or he may be sliding further into dementia.  The vice president and cabinet should demand a full cognitive examination.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I'll believe the Fourth Estate before I believe a idiotic tweet coming from the White House.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: So what are they going to do, hang Obama by Michelle's balls?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Three years may be too late....there are "Butts" that need to be kicked pronto.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: no, Kuk, we disagree with a nasty ass destructive punk
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I am beginning to wonder if they even know
how to tell the difference between sexes.
1/ Men have a penis and testicles
2/ women are smooth in that body region.
Does that help you jr.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: That's how you must work to think up something so disgusting.  Somebody should kick  in your Hobo balls so you have nothing to scratch.  But then again you have no balls and are just a punk arse!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: When the Liberals took the reins of power in 2001 the provincial debt was 31 billion. 16 years later the debt has increased to north of 70 billion. Add in contractual obligations and the debt balloons to north of 165 billion. Debt will be Christy Clark's legacy. The sooner John arranges or a forensic audit the sooner Ms. Clark will step down in shame.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I didn't like AFDC because it lowered the incentive for having the husband/father in the house....more payout...

Catholic DEMOCRAT Moynihan pointed this out in his report...the disincentives to various government reports.

My inclination is toward economics/incentives/compensating behaviors/unintended consequences..in the model of Gary Becker from the Univ of Chicago.

Some people here at NCR seem to be largely hidden racists of sorts, pretending that the Democrats and their laundry list of half-thought out programs have done great things for blacks.   And contrariwise, that Republicans are mean white guys.    I didn't know there was anyone left still holding such cartoonish views.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: That`s why I hate and loath liberalism, its always boils down to big government knows best..!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: And the Quran does not include female genital mutilation.  Are you also opposed to male genital mutilation?  Jesus underwent it.  It was ordered by God.  It's in the Bible.
So, all Muslims have the same culture, because they are Muslims.  Therefore, all Christians engage in genocidal war and militarized rape (as was done by christian Croats and Serbs in the 1990s).   All Christians have a culture of protesting at military funerals (a practice one group of christians engages in).  After all, they all agree on the Bible, so what one group does somewhere on the planet, all Christian cultures endorse.
Surely you are aware "culture" and religion aren't the same thing.  Or do you actually believe all muslims engage in female genital mutilation?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Fuck Femenism!!!! If women want to show their tits,  men can look. Y'all are startin' to sound like a damn church ladies group or something. Are you trying to get on the front page of the Weslyn Methodist Magazine or what? Grow up and get a life!!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Just another shallow egomaniacal feminist libtard.
Blow it out your ass, Honey.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I am sure Bush was sexually aroused by touching her.  After all, he was only 90 at the time.  He most likely wanted to grab her by the boobs, but he couldn't stand to do that so he did the next best thing and grabbed her by the butt.  Dirty old man.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Now women are giving up sex as they always had, just not getting a thing in return because they don't need it.
Some try to withhold it in order to get more than sex for it, but fails miserably because there are plenty of sex starved women frequently willing to give more for it, specially if they can pretend to themselves and the world that they aren't paying for sex.

Women aren't happy with it, one because they have that itch that say sex isn't as hot if they aren't exploring the man, second because they aren't getting it easily, worst, they are having to work for it, specially because they think they could get more.
Back in the day a woman was happy to fuck a guy, and if she got pregnant she was happy to have him to help her support her and his kids and to have someone to fuck for the rest of her life, and she'd be probably happy to cheat a few times too. (so would he)
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: When the alleged wardrobe malfunction occurred and her boob was exposed, Jackson claimed the media was making a mountain out of a mole hill.  She was right.  Her boob was no bigger than a mole hill.
Output: Sexual-explicit