niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Comment: why is there no ovesight on judges.  they cleary are not capable of governing. I hope this is just the beginning and the rest of the big headed control freaks get their butts kicked to the sidelines.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I'm concerned about it, yes. Your not listening or hearing the people. Keep your head buried in the dirt,,. Your butt is exposed. What do you think may happen to an exposed butt??? In your case enjoy
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: ... refineries gallore to feed all those HUNGRY GAS GUZZLING SINGLE OCCUPANCY TRUCKS AND CARS ... everyone gets to SUCK on their own WASTE.  Perfect!!!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: RandR, the season at the moment is hating non-white immigrants.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: All of y'all are soft. Letting suits ruin your life. They are miserable too because the system has failed and now we are just trying to catch stains that are left over from the monetary system. Oh well crappy unis wont fix any problem- what will fix it? Nothing! Why? Because these occupy movements are soft. You guys in Cana-duh don't know how to move in a large amount. Your government has turned you useless. Rendered you idle for the nasty men on top. NEWSFLASH: nothing is fair. Money isn't fair. You work hard and get the same per hour pay, what's the point of working hard? And then you have a man that does a couple clicks on a computer and gets millions of $$$. Sad but true. Stand up for your rights-oh wait, you can't. You can't because you have been rendered useless. You are just a perfect tax, loan and interest payer for the cheese on top. That's what you are: A TAX PAYER. Why should they teach you something useful? So that you can TRANSFER your knowledge?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yet another big boost from Justin at giving this story it's own legs.  

Ambrose handled it politically brilliantly asking Justin the same question 18 times.  She knew she'd get the same on script non-answer 18 times.   And it made him look foolish and out manoeuvred.

She played him masterfully. 

Now, Justin finds himself cornered in a damned if you do, damned if you don't, catch 22.   Go and I look guilty by association.  Don't go and I look guilty by disassociation.

It's not the innocuous helicopter ride that's significantly tarnishing Justins brand, yes he made a banal and insignificant ethical blunder, he just handled it so badly every step of the way he's now tarnishing the image of the Aga Khan.

It's the textbook definition of snuffing out a match with a bucket of gasoline.

And it's just entertaining, albeit now eclipsing the Aga Khans good works.  NOT the self-serving appearance of good works, I might add.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yes, I have a Romanian jewish friend who lived through the period because her town was not  invaded.

However, as Poland was ground zero for European jews, it was rare that an entire town or region was left unscathed. As far as I knew, most of the Galician jews were wiped out.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Another "keep hope alive" spawn of the Bush era to use media access to beat the dead horse issue long after all of the investigations are over.  How many right-wing, fascist columnists now occupy the pages of the Washington Post?  One is too many.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Maybe the Ottawa yoga octopussy could call Kim up and offer him a blowjob
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Shameful behaviour from the audience.  

Meanwhile the article repeats this lie:  "a video surfaced in which he boasted about grabbing women’s genitals."  He boasted that famous people like himself *could*, not *did*.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I hope he starts kicking ass a little more.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I would talk about the lies you spread about Hillary, but I really need to talk about something else.

You personally were against trans using the same bathrooms as women because they might be groped. You are now excusing someone who is in court for the rape of a 13 year old and openly stated he groped women.

Christianity Today, the largest evangelical mag, dropped Trump due to him being very non-Christ like.

You are literally advocating for someone that is talking about sexual assault.

Let me spell it out. Saying "She has a nice ass" is different that 'Grab them by the p***y...they can't say no cause your are rich and powerful.

Until you understand the difference please step aside and let real honorable men have a conversation about how women should be treated.

I as a man refuse to be lumped into the category as those that abuse women.

Learn what consent is.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: It's funny how guns=ignorance and complete absence of critical thinking.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The biggest problem  with democracy is retards like you get to vote.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: It's Butts that Trudeau needs to fire more than Morneau.  Every attempt to put out the flames on this backlash just make it worse.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: That's one of your sillier aphorisms.
All monotheistic believers believe God reaches down to them.
People can receive revelation from God without God having to take on the form of a human being.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Then it might be time to protect our rights as the courts and governments backing this garbage have become illegitimate
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Maybe her thinking is that if we could just get people drinking more, they wouldn't live so long and that would reduce PERS payouts. It reminds me of the tobacco company that went into newly-free Eastern Europe and tried to convince the government that it could reduce retirement benefits by encouraging more smoking.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: If your father let his body rape you and let this rapist go without a word and turn around all upset and talk about a neighbor getting paid fair or not, would you praise him like you did here?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: me/you:  I'm not going to get involved in doing PR work for the Hop Valley owner/founders.  However, may I relate a short, personal and I think, relevant story.  

I've always been a politically active person.  That didn't set well with a local School District where I was employed.  They found a way to use a "reduction in force" to end my employment.  Like Mr. Johnson,  I felt I had been "royally screwed" and was extremely bitter.  Fortunately, I was able to "get over it" and keep that bitterness from clouding my future.  It wasn't real easy,   I still think the administrators and Board members were a bunch of #@$%$s, but they are $#$%^s "in the past."  I've "gotten even" by enjoying the last 30 plus years and, while I've been "at it", outliving all of them.

  It sounds like Aaron is doing the same.  

This will sound a little "preachy", but, IMO,  how we handle "getting screwed" is more important than "getting screwed"  regards and best wishes,   Gary
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: An very interesting and informative article by Mr. Arinaga.  However, it would be most informative to know how much the rescues of people who have ignored "no trespassing", "closed", "hike at your own risk / responsibility" or similar signs annually cost the taxpayers of  Hawaii.  Helicopters and rescue and recovery search parties for these hikers violating the law are expensive and also in many cases detract from the rescuer's (firemen, EMTs, etc.) primary functions.  Breaking the law, and frankly, outright ignorance is no excuse and should not be without appropriate costs to the culprits involved.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: These magnets were marketed and sold as a novelty/toy.  That you don't understand that something so potentially damaging and lethal should not be sold as a toy speaks to your irrationality and foolishness.

But I understand how the conjob "mind" works (or doesn't).  As long as somebody makes a buck off of it, who cares?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Next, beer for women and gays made with sperm. Yuck to both!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I didn't think toupees were still in vogue. Lemme see Apache tits up. You're hired!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Hey, that's funny!  Oh wait . . . I thought you said "removes Butts from his hole."
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: lets get real folks, its just sex. its not as if cops are not " doing it". lets move on to trumps crimes against society, thank you.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Whats your point,
He will  lay waste regardless
That is his job
You think a bunch of sniveling Georgia tech safe spacers worry him?
Please.
He will feast of these yuppies
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Knew, don't care. This is about the UAA volleyball team, not your off-topic blather. Try to keep up, okay?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Beat me to it. TS is slim, but no transparent (and she was clothed).

"“I saw her fall into the female, and she had a shocked look,” event photographer Stephanie Simbeck said, “and I saw his hand grab her ass.”"

Perhaps she was doing the Linda Blair move from "The Exercist". Perhaps not.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Very interesting that you can use an article about hugh heffner dying to spew misogynistic vitriol.

It is not women's fault that certain men feel the need to purchase human beings.

I'm a man and I can honestly say I've never bragged about sexually assaulting women.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The voice of Limbaauuggh sure sends chills down my spine. Horrifying.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Pussy.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Why Government of Canada is supporting the illegal people. The Citizens and permanent residents are sitting without jobs but refugees are getting paid.....We must protest this type of overriding; the Canadian citizens are open to help the humanitarian causes but not the predators of neighbouring country
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Robert E. Lee and his comrades were traitors.  Nothing less, nothing more.  They committed treason against the United States of America.  They should've been shot.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: New Yorker journalist Ryan Lizza reported that in a telephone conversation Scaramucci let loose on Steve Bannon:
“I’m not trying to build my own brand off the f**king strength of the President. I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own c**k.”
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Absolute rubbish.
The President MUST obey the law...even when drafting laws.
This is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Were you also at the meeting in Colorado Springs in August?  If so, you saw typical liberals doing what they do best.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Markham is horrific.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: As a (now former) Carrier employee I can tell you the lady quoted in this article does not speak for all carrier employees. I can also tell you that this first layoff consisted largely of employees who chose to take the buyout package so if she is leaving she's also taking lump of cash with her, a pension, up to 4 years of free college and 4 months of insurance with her, instead of a goodbye and a boot in the ass.  I"m personally thankful for the jobs that Trump was able to keep in Indy. Unlike the selfish low info people being interviewed I realize that every job kept benefits my community.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Fat ass, go eat another do-nut.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: If you dont like it move to Canada eagle bitch. And suck it!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Sorry Harkins, but you'er sounding like the anti-christ's son or twin.  Get outta here with your pussy, sabertooth blubbering.  Ssst.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: What a guy, so funny and a great humanitarian rip jerry.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Wonder if he's recovered from mommy's special pictures and daddy bragging about sexually assaulting women? Not enough therapy can help that little sperm.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: "Very low level sexual assaults, like very low level common assaults, are usually not prosecuted."

Understandably. But if sexual assaults of that nature aren't going to be prosecuted, why are they considered a criminal offence? Criminal law recognizes different categories of sexual assault at the most extreme end, yet makes no distinction between a minor sexual indiscretion and a violent sexual assault.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: LOL... this pussy on the head thing  is totally Freudian.   I don't recall women protesting when Slick Willy put a cigar in Monica Lewinsky.  Wat up wit dat?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: But that's only IF/WHEN the voice of we the people are heard and rule the nation. That situation is NOT the case in America wherein the Right and the Religious Right and the re-emerged Alt-Right, the BIG corporations, Fascism and lobbyists are the real rulers of America. WE the people no longer run this nation only the rabid rule.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: we'll beat your ass and cut your throat maggot.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Freedom of speech applies to everyone, not just the speech one doesn't like. While foreign nationals may not have the right to vote, like it or not, they do have the same right to stand on a street corner and espouse their viewpoints.

It has also been decided that purchasing ads is covered by the same freedom.

Sadly, what the people that want to shut down other people offering their opinions are really saying that US citizens are too stupid to make their own decisions. They are attempting this censorship under the guise of protecting simpletons from being influenced to vote a certain way.

It's a very slippery slope to try and draw a line between freedom of speech and influencing others.  After all, isn't that what freedom of speech is for?? Whether it is to buy a BMW or vote for Donald Trump, it is still a protected right to be able to publicly state one's opinion.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The folks who voted for Trump would not be violently protesting if that is what you seem to be projecting. You are right, both Clinton and Obama showed some class, Harry Reid showed the extreme side of the dem. party, and he is a shining example of what the folks have had enough of. Do you still just not get it? Are you and others here so indoctrinated you just cannot see the truth? What a sad and violent party the dems. are. Throwing temper tantrums when you don't get your way. You on the left who will not condemn the violence are indeed a part of the problem even if you are  not actively participating. You folks do realize, or maybe not because some on the left just don't seem able to think critically but those idiots destroying property, those idiots hurting innocent folks, they are doing even more harm to your party.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yes, and the term "Gun Violence" is a Neuro linguistic programming of the Masses worthy of Joseph Goebbels.  Not possible for a gun to be violent, nor a knife nor a Car -But evil People Do use all and more to hurt, maim, and kill.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Totally agree. Not to mention that shopping around tax returns is a felony for whoever gave it to the NBC. The NBC could not legally release the vagina tape, so, as we recently learned, they leaked it to the WaPo to derail Trump's campaign. New low for the media.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Iran does not need our condolences they will quickly and efficiently clean up this annoyance, much better than the West with their pussy footing around.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Funny because Colorado is a red state the last 30 years. We did a great job while your sorry boulder ass was gone.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: What’s all the fuss about? Cancel her visa and send her back where she belongs. Why put up with foreign rabble rousers here?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Question: If the person was a drunk girl who had passed out......and the nurses were a college football team who.....lifted/removed items of clothing.....to admire her breasts, etc.....would any concern or outrage be the same, less, or more?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Until kids are out of high school I don't think this should be going on.  I respect their personal beliefs but they need to respect that of mine to raise my children without exposure to these kind of confusing things at that age.  Once they are 18 go gang busters.  Until then keep your penis out of my daughter's lockerroom.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Clintons past with Monica was consentual, while not okay.

Trump is a admitted sex offender and it is not consentual.

Thanks for supporting Americas rape culture. NOT.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Practice yoga regularly...your butt will love you and you will love your butt
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Preeeecisely.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: What an ass! Bring your kids up how you wish. You just substituted one gigantic lie for another.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: "If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, according to federal charges."

So he stands to face more jail time than the kid in Boulder got for raping a woman.    :ROLL
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Republicans are bad for business.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: i think they're both lying. He definitely creeped her out - look how much distance she keeps. His hand is clearly behind her but - not the normal place for a promotional picture - but if he would have lifted her skirt it would have been clearly visible. Most likely he gave her a couple of pats on the butt and she's over dramatizing the whole thing.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: '
Smoking pot doesn't equate to conversion therapy, 

contrary to some folks belief, ...it won't turn you into a commie hippie, 

…as to the legislature, they had access to pot before legalization same as everyone else.

Ever watch gavel to gavel?  Baked, I tell ya.  

Just look at most of the legislation that they produced.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Some cynics among us suspect that this indeed is a major factor in the climate-change-will-kill-us-all! brohouha --- make the use of fossil fuels legally actionable, so that entities claiming "injury" by climate can sue for the Big Bucks.  :-/

It's been tried before - one of the small Pacific island nations (Vanuatu, I think) filed some sort of suit in the 1990s regarding sea level rise.  But the plaintiffs forgot (or didn't know) that the Pacific Ocean in effect sloshes back and forth in time with the ENSO to the tune of several centimeters relative sea level change per cycle.  They filed suit at a time when the relative sea level had in fact been *dropping* around their islands for several years - kind of shot themselves in the foot.  (Didn't win the case either, as I recall.)  ;-)

It will be interesting to see how the CA suits turn out.  A win would certainly help them fill the huge hole in the public pension liabilities that they face.  (The real reason for filing?)
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: She's not hypocritical; she's either paid to post or she hopes to be.  Either way, making up lies to post online to try to convince other people of her lies is nearly a full time job for her.  She's mendacious to the core and it's just too bad this new site doesn't have a block button so she could just talk to herself.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Tokuda and Luke don't have the balls to stop rail. But someday, some politician will finally come along and say that all this cash just ain't worth the bang for the buck and we can't afford it. It's that., or Honolulu goes bankrupt.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: When are we gonna talk about the MSM anti-trump hate's influence on this?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The reason there was no mention of the "Russia" farce is that it has been dropped from Dem talking points. Why? With the crap that is going to come out of the Dem hack (or buried, as the case may be), a back room deal has been made. One hand washes the other...
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The DNC hacks become public the same day as Pussy Grab Gate!   Which one did you think would generate the most attention in mainstream America? Every one knows sex sells!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Great post.  Missed was failed electoral reform, broken election promises (small business tax cut... LOL!), being obsessed what's between peoples legs ( Kirsty Duncan threatening universities to remove research funding if they don't have more female researchers), etc, etc.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: CBC, Toronto Star, all the rest completely ignore the almost unprecedented rebuke by the US, CSIS directors, top security analysts, etc. If there was an organized photo-op of Trudeau talking about equality somewhere, they would all cover that though. 

When the media is biased and ignorant, the people are ignorant.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "Watch Dear White People on Netflix. Then you'll get an idea of what's at stake."

You know that Dear White People is mostly a satire of the entire SJW phenomenon, right?  A huge component of that show is making the perpetually offended look ridiculous.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: None of your links back your statements that the Tea Party is not racist, violent or xenophobic.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Correct...the names on these indictments will be Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Huma Abedin and the rest of corrupt donkeys or obstruction of justice and Hillary's home server.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Typical lib tard. Blah blah blah spend more money. Blah blah blah create bigger government. Blah blah blah conduct govt sanctioned fishing expeditions that go nowhere.  
Tired ass cult of criminal liberal mental disorder.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: No, he was accused of being a racist white man.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Now "The Mooch" has a lot more free time to spend with his family and to "suck his own c**k."  Oh wait, he walked out on his family like a true Trumpster.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Trump is a "kiss-ass" and no judge of character.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: His or her butt....
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Rally? The guy who waved an oosik at a woman in the House; told a reporter to f-off; and who hardly shows up to do his job? Remember in November -- Don't Be a Young Fool.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I  belong to the last generation of Catholics who still remember the liturgy as it was before the Second Vatican Council (and who still know their Latin). I respect that liturgy for what it was and what it meant to those who came before us -- especially those who lived under persecution -- but I have no desire to return to it. The world has moved on since 1962. So has the Church.

This debate is fundamentally about ecclesiology, not liturgy. Let's weed the biretta-boys out of the seminaries and close any seminaries that are still teaching the toxic doctrine that a priest is 'ontologically superior' to a layperson.

If you were to attend Solemn Mass at The Oratory in London (where one of my uncles was a priest for 25 years), you would think you were attending a pre-Vatican II Mass. In fact, it is a modern Roman Mass celebrated in Latin with traditional ceremonial including fiddle-back chasubles, lace albs and birettas. Few Catholics under 60 would know the difference.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: ""Have you forgoten Okalahoma? Just a good ole country boy. lol""

And are terrorists more likely to come from Muslim countries or from Oklahoma?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: You wouldn’t know "pride" if it bit you on the @ss.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I was absolutely not kidding. Goretti achieved the greatest sacrifice--according to the narrative--because while set upon viciously by an out of control teenage boy, she did not commit the mortal sin of having sex with someone other than her husband. 

It wasn't my remark, Pandora. It was the pope's pronouncement. That her mother educated her into martyrdom. There you have it. Allow yourself to be killed rather than raped.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: This Muslim says "WTG El-Papa."  Wholeheartedly agree.  Heard her speak one time in which she said, "You girls, please don't kill your babies--give them to me."  Wept until my beard was met because it was clear to me and everyone present that she meant every word she said.  I won't pray to her, as I only pray to God, but I certainly have no problem revering her as a saint.  A MUCH better choice than some of the Church's earlier picks.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: No,  the citizen that cronfronted the suspect outside of the church was. He heard the gunfire, grabbed his rifle, confronted suspect, shot him.. dropping his AR thrn fleeing. Citizen then chased him down till he crashed.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Outsider77 when individuals make such uninformed, uneducated, un-American statements they are not worthy of the effort to even debate. There is nothing you can say or do that will change the poisoning of their political nonsense.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yes, but the attorney has to be able to back up what he says in order to win the case. And he's not going to take on a loser case.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: So getting away with sexual assault qualifies as legal behavior worthy of the president. I guess in this country wealth and race are more important than the law. When did it become legal to grab women by their vaginas without permission? When did it become legal to hire illegal labor? I thought housing discrimination was made illegal in the 1960's. Trump is guilty of all those crimes.  Jerry, you are very selective with your law and order attitude. It looks like you don't mind rich white men getting away with crimes. You are living proof that white male privilege is real. In this country, your quality of justice depends on your race, gender, sexual orientation, class, and wealth or lack there of. Justice is not blind here.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Donald Trump will teach the Republican Party to scrutinize who they allow into their realm and who they choose as leader.  He has declared bankruptcy five times and now shows he is morally bankrupt as well.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Smoke away, fools!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: If we refuse to construct natural gas plants in Southern Ontario because it is harmful to the spirit of the community, this makes sense.  If we attach a name to a natural place that is beautiful and powerful, the courts choose to rationalize the situation in purely religious terms.  This imposes Christianity embodiment on the term "spirit."  It goes without saying that God has no penis or testicles.  But he is portrayed as a male - usually Caucasian - due to this incessant need need to rationalize the embodiment of things and dismiss the perceptions of others.  I certainly won't be visiting any resorts in British Columbia.  I consider the province insensitive and disrespectful of culture.  I don't think anyone with any sense of environmental activism can support this development either politically or with their vacation savings.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The decision to circumcise should indeed be a personal decision, made only by the person who owns the penis.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Brad Avakian is a career politician, who is easily bought off with campaign donations.  He is not to be trusted.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: If you've ever shot anyone you would know that it's not easy and the first time is generally worse. I don't care that the attacker got shot, just that someone had to pull the trigger.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: What a great opportunity for a local girl to be molested by our SprayONBack Gorilla of a president. Perhaps Trump will GRAB HER BY THE PUSSY! J.k. Congradulations Mrs Waldron. Please use this platform to adress real issues :). I wish you luck, and stay away from the oval office!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: What's really bugging you? On this same board you posted exactly my argument in full agreement, and yet are pulling this juvenile crap on what I said? What's really bugging you that you're now trolling my posts?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Alt-left? Now you're just making things up. You think asking if you're a hater is comparable to Nazis? Wow.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: OK you guys quit being mean to sister McCain. Live long the fighting dicks.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Democrats promised insurance would be affordable.  Affordable for who?  Affordable when?  Affordable how?  Those premiums were heavily subsidized through Federally subsidized premiums.    Alaska saw nearly $80,000,000 in healthcare costs paid for by American taxpayers.  $80,000,000 in healthcare costs for 1300 people.  Alaska's major hospital is a non profit.   Where has all the money gone since no one is making any money?  Where did all the money come from?  This is Obama's legacy.  His most proud accomplishment.  20,000,000 more people with health insurance.  Now,  you Hope Republicans can fix this?  Stupid can't be fixed.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Stephen Paddock was not a "responsible gun owner," he was a mass murderer. Since you brought up death toll, perhaps you already forgot about the Islamic extremist who killed 84 people in Nice, France last year by running them over with a rented truck?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Rats jumping On to the ship.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: And anti-Trump supporters are prone to violence as we have seen all over the country, including at the Eugene rally this summer.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: the governor is a pussy and a kiss ass.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: giant hickeys.  need one down under, hahaha
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Misrepresentation. Maryam Monsef c'mon down. 2019 cannot come soon enough to toss these idiots. I guess being a Canadian doesn't count for much anymore.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: What... what? What does that have to do with anything? 

As with most things, you decide subjectively that X = hate and then scoff at anyone who asks you to actually defend that position. Way more stories on this site about illegal immigrants killing citizens than there are stories about cops shooting people, but saying "illegal immigrants are importing crime into our country" is racist because "not all," but you'll turn around and villify all cops as "fascist thugs." It's always this way with uber-sensitive, overly politicized people like you. The same sort of person that called Obama a socialist Kenyan now calls Trump a "xenophobic racist." It's all hyperbolic nonsense but in the mind of someone like you anyone who points out your silliness is a "socialist," or a "Nazi" depending on which color tie your candidate wears. It's incredible to me that you can even function day to day with this going on inside your head.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: if he wants to be anti-pc, then he should stfu.  he should also have sex with ivanka already...i think they both want it
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: icon66:  "If Trump were to turn over a new leaf--..."  if trump were to turn a  new leaf in life, without that money he's got no wife. he's got the dough to pay off all.  enough , he hopes, to prevent his fall.  is he looking at time for all his crime?  folks getting in line just to drop that dime.**
**  
 "Your faith in Trump, in the face of everything he's said and everything he's done in the past not to mention the appointments he has already made public, indicate that you, like a great many people from the older generation who voted for Trump, suffer from some sort of ailment which was why I suggested you have yourself checked."    -----well said!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "Catholic laity are amongst the most supportive of civil marriage equality."
True. However:
It is not the laity who are afforded greater respect & reverence by legislators, it is the clergy. Legislators (particularly o the right of the political spectrum) appear to bend over backwards to accommodate the will & thinking of the clergy.
It is generally not Catholic laity taking action in the courts on matters of LGBT rights. But the Catholic clergy certainly do (a perfect example of this was the constitutional court challenge to Uganda's toxic anti homosexuality law. Catholic laity were nowhere to be seen in that court case, but the Catholic clergy petitioned the court to stand in defense of that toxic and violent law).

All you have done is point out the human shield of "nice people" surrounding the more rabidly homophobic among the clergy.
You have deflected attention onto the cloak of disguise worn by the inherently homophobic core.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Did anyone else read this sentence, "People use the Internet to seek out 'not information but confirmation,' University of Utah historian Robert A. Goldberg told Politico, 'and they confirm what they believe and find links to other conspiracy theories they can believe in,'" as the confirmation they wanted that conspiracy theorists are nuts?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: According to another source, the post was:
"Your a crooked &%* trying to take a guys home security away judge XXXX. I got a little something in mind for you and your crooked blueye Clackamas County sheriff's."

That's 3 counts of improper apostrophe use. Book him!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: After 100+ years of helping build Canada from the ground up, you have the shameless ignorance to attack Amish and Mennonite communities - you are pathetic. There is no modern parallel to the regressive scourge of Islamism, that much is tragically highlighted on a weekly (if not daily) basis.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: There ya go again Rick... Talking out your ass! Where do you get she was charged???? Again... Learn to read! So everyone knows... Im her mother and she was NOT charged or cited with ANYTHING! She, my daughter-in-law, and my 18-month-old grandson were the victims here Rick! Mr. Naval was cited and has to appear in court for further possible charges and/ or possible jail time. And Rick... If you want to know Mr. Naval's past record... Look it up, it is public record... But I'm sure you know that Mr. Know -it-all, after your 31 years of law enforcement. You just might end up choking on your own quotes some more!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Bob Dylan wrote a song a few years back called, "The Mighty Quinn". In a weird but accurate way this Trump 
gig is all there. Well worth googling the lyrics.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: President Obama beat Trump to it. He is building a 15 foot all red brick wall (at our taxpayer expense for security) around his new Washington DC  5 - 6 million dollar house.  I guess that will keep out all the illegal aliens out and the boyz from the DC hood from kicking in the door for armed robberies.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Someone wrote that the same people arguing that these girls should have to more effectively cover their midsections are the same people arguing that it is ok for young girls to have to put on a hijab.

I dunno. 

In the first place, the hijab argument does not fit with the ten year old girl. Pre-pubescent girls are not required to cover their hair in most Muslim traditions.

But in the second place, is there really no difference between, on the one hand, seeing a seventeen year old with hair reaching from her forehead to her shoulders, and, on the other hand, seeing a seventeen year old's backside who is wearing thong undies under thin sheer leggings?

I have a sneaking suspicion that, if you did a poll of all Canadian mothers, more would be comfortable with seated middle-aged men admiring their teen daughter's hair than with seated middle-aged men admiring their teen daughter's thong-and-legging veneered backsides.

Does that mean all those moms are just sexist and narrow-minded?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Who would want to RAPE Justin Beeber??????
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I guess if Jesse Lehrich would have said, "Hey, @realDonaldTrump - regarding your claim that Captain Khan would be alive if you were president: go "grab [yourself] by the pussy", it would have been OK. Locker room banter, right? After all, 59 year old boys will be 59 year old boys.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The Rockies should just blame their loss on the Diamondbacks colluding with the Russians.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Does anyone actually drink these beers? They are, as the joke goes, like sex in a canoe.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I shouldn't expect logic from someone who believes in the Bible as a literal historic document. I forget there are those who find logic in Adam and Eve's story, ignoring that their sons must have had sex with their mom or had sex with sisters to later have wives.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: There's no 'react' symbol for your sub-human drivel.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Seriously!  As a woman voter I am mostly concerned with someone's hair and whether or not they have a vagina.  I am voting for Hillary because she has a vagina and a really nice helmet of hair.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Sikfuk doesn't deserve to draw another breath.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Mixing up extra-marital affairs to which both parties gave consent with assault and sex with minors. Hodge-podge.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: No, the penis requirement is NOT for God's sake!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The President was unequivocal. He said on all sides. That not only included the KKK and neo nazi party, but also black lives matter and antifa
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: The Chinese appear do the same thing.

Recently I made a comment on an article critical to China and received many disagree icons. They were all from numbered bots from the same site that appeared to be Chinese.

The Internet has been a wild west for far too long. The public must be protected from these predators.

It is time for severe penalties for anyone misusing it, regardless of where they live in the world and who they work for.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Oh boy. Here comes the anti freedom crowd! Imagine how they'd scream if we treated religion the way they treat drugs. Religious zealots bomb abortion clinics, burn crosses on Black peoples' lawns and bombed the World Trade Center so therefore - because of a few bad actors- we should discourage and impede religious observation?  

Some drinkers and weed smokers behave irresponsibly, so what!? What does that have to do with my right to behave responsibly?  I need to prove to you that I'm not a terrorist before I can pray to God?  Absurd. 

Prohibitionists, be careful what you preach lest you suffer the fate you inflict.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Pleasssssssssssssssssssse give it a rest!!! Craig Oliver should have hung up his spurs a long time ago. HE IS IN HIS 80"S and sound old and could be mistaken for Scrooge!! Fire his ass out the door!!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time.  Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand?  It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again.  Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un).  A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point.  They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Mucky non-man!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Why do you hit the 'like' for your own posts?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: It is laughable for the Conservatives to cry foul - they were the masters of omnibus bills.  But, the HarperCons made no secret of it - they were blatant in their attempts to weaken Parliament.

Trudeau, on the other hand, promised real change and positive politics.  To table an omnibus bill is shameful.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Yes I agree. McCain is one of a very small minority of snr republicans who is outwardly and publicly calling out Trump. I have great respect for ANY republican who stands up to this bully. Unfortunately, most are keeping a low profile and hoping that their agenda gets swept along with Trump's. I'm extremely unimpressed with the Republican party, not that it matters to them.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: People wanted change, not reading a paper or listening to the news, they prove Trump's reason for running to show how uninformed voters are and how easy they can be fooled.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Attention Oregonians:  Senator Ron Wyden,  a UofO law school grad,  failed the Oregon bar exam three times,  and has never been able to practice before the bar.  So when he pontificates  (or would that be rabbinicalates?)  that Trump Jr. talked to the Russian lawyer soliciting buyers for information she evidently did not have,  he was NOT colluding with anyone about anything.  A shill in a skirt did a fan dance with some legal papers,  conned her way to an interview,  was listened to until it was determined that she was barking up the wrong tree about the wrong stuff, and was politely excused.  

Now,  was there dirt on Hillary Clinton?  Who would know?  Would dirt be useful in a political campaign?  You betcha!   Would the DNC solicit dirt on any Republican candidate?  Damned straight they would!!  Is that all "politics as usual?"  yep.  The American Way.   Happens daily.  The DNC is dredging for damaging information on any sitting Republican today, yesterday, and will be tomorrow.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: This is ridiculous!  It was the Conservative Party that broke the law and violated his rights.  Why are we responsible?  It's time to start a petition to force the Conservative Party to pay all of this settlement.  This is about the law and those who broke the law.  The Conservative Party is guilty as hell, as per the Supreme Court ruling.  Hey Harper, get out your damn cheque book!!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: "getting our partners exhausted from change."

"Partners" my ass. 

Funny how our "partners" never complain about exhaustion when the Rs won't to lower the taxes on them. Go figure. 

Keep voting R! (You fools...)
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: And can only folks with male genitalia be converted and express service?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: And what does that have to do with the president or any of his cabinet?

They haven't made any anti Semitic comments, or directives.

Instead, they have cozied up to Israel in a way that no president ever has.

So what you offer is just baseless name calling, and it's a baseless smear on the millions of Americans who voted for the president.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Standard Liberal Party ..."say one thing...do another" Junior needs to get the message....the world changed bigly Nov.8, 2016, or his ass will be grass.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I hope the judge's 18 year old grand daughter is lucky enough to be drunk in a cab and then 'consent' to have sex with a smelly cab driver.

Hey judge, she was falling down drunk, but she said yes, so its okay that I had sex with her, correct?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Ha ha.  
The boom was the result of Reagonomics still reverberating through the economy, Bush’s defeat of Sadam Hussein resulting in $8.00 a barrel oil and the collapse of the Solviet Empire.  Clinton’s economic proposals were written on napkins and ignored after the Democrats lost power in Congress.  Two of Clinton’s stupid economic proposals that failed to pass included a federal BTU tax on every unit of energy used by every American and Hillary-Care.  His legacy was teaching our children that oral sex isn’t sex.   

If you tax the profit out of work than no one will work.  It works every time it is tried.  The stuff they used to make disappears. Shortages develope, see Venezuela/Cuba.  If you let people keep the efforts of their labor, they will produce more to sell. It will cost everyone else less to buy the excess stuff suddenly being made.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: 130mph? Throw his ass in jail...then throw away the key.  Nothing else seems to get these punks attention. Oh, I know...his momma says he's actually a good boy who would never harm a flea.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: If you voted for Trump, would you want that nutcase in charge of your anesthetics? "Patient died during surgery. Nothing to see here." comes to mind!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Extreme Sports Alaska: ice racing, heli-skiing, combat fishing,kite surfing,kite-skiing, snow machining, rip tide surfing, fat biking etc.

Badass Boats: Boat moving, boat building, fixing up boats, lifestyles of the rich and famous boat owners

Aurora Chasers: Stories and pictures from Alaska's Photographers

Alcan Adventures: Young couple sick of the lower 48 rat race leaves it all behind and drives to Alaska, highlighting adventures along the way.  They eventually buy land and build their own home.

Alaska Pot Shop : Growing, Testing, Running a cafe for pot smokers- The life of a successful pot businessman and the culture that surrounds it.  Show what really goes on, people chatting,drinking coffee, playing games, creating art, playing music in a pot cafe vs. the difference in bars where people are acting moronic, barfing, looking to hook up and quite frequently getting violent.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: I would imagine if they had not denounced this, there would be a sarin attack on their churches come Easter Sunday.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Definitely a Muslim brotherhood terrorist holed up in US or a Saudi paid agent who can't get over the drubbing that his proxies are getting in Syria at the hands of the Syrian army and the Hezbollah
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Really.  So when a woman strips down to nothing and rubs her breasts in a man's face, she has no responsibility whatsoever as to what happens to her?  Why do you think party strippers bring body guards?  This whole women-are-the-same-as-men-except-when-it's-more-advantageous-to-be-victims  nonsense is getting old.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I've always liked Woody Allen's comment that "sex is dirty if you do it right."
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Asking for Comey's loyalty could simply be  "will you be fair and honest"?   Comey was neither....so President Trump did the right thing and threw him out on his bum.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: And this is why we're a great country and China never will be.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: Did it show the French getting their asses handed to them by the English at the Plains of Abraham or are they still too sensitive about that?
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Haven't met a Catholic couple yet who fails to use birth control. Anyone remembering or knowing how 1960s teaching on birth control by Pope Paul was handed down knows how arbitrary it was and how it was contrary to commission formed to study issue. Institutional Church continues to demonstrate how inept it is in dealing with matters of sex-----------all matters of sex from sexual abuse of children to matters of conjugal love.
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: Bannon's going to perform his famous sexual athletics trick
then he'll whip Judge Roy while Sara Palin give him a golden shower

A true "deplorables sunday dinner"
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: The Judge has been known to have good sources in Law Enforcement. His scoop on Brit GCHQ was right on the money,  even though he was suspended and the Brits claimed "Utterly ridiculous and should be ignored".  Only to be shown as liars by later releases.  Disregard him at your peril.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit
Comment: There has been a lot of these stories over the past few months

and I am wondering WHERE ARE THE PARENTS AND WAY ARENT THEY TAKING CARE OF THEIR KIDS AND HAVE THEM UNDER CURFEWS?!!!!!!!!!

Yes rape is very bad against kids but the kids share some of the blame along with the adults!
Output: Sexual-explicit
Comment: I'm at least proud that you spelled "drivel" correctly. So many of your ilk cannot.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit