niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Are you going to try and suggest that armed robbery is carried out by people who have a strong conscious and wouldn't harm the helpless?
Output: Valid
i think that SOCOM would love guns arms that cant be dected, it would alco be useful for undercover agents.
Output: Valid
Despite the illustration of the article, I think you'll find virtually none of the burglars was carrying a gun, and if any householders were killed it is a tiny number.
Output: Valid
And if one looks beyond legal sources, ���bear arms��� was frequently used in nonmilitary contexts.
Output: Valid
"to keep and bear Arms" - this would include any gun
Output: Valid
Can you show me any proof that the 50% you refer to actually have or did buy guns before committing a crime?
Output: Valid
I work in the mental health field and there are many people that I work with that guns should be absoultely kept away.
Output: Valid
The Senate's Sargent at Arms, and the assistant former director of the FBI says there is no way to prevent someone who is committed to carry it out.
Output: Valid
You're saying that an unarmed man can't have intent to cause violence since he's unarmed?
Output: Valid
You will go to your grave trying for more and more and even more gun control.
Output: Valid
A gardener or a tree surgeon would have good reason to carry a knife as an occupational tool in working hours.
Output: Valid
This is akin to someone learning the value of hard work while working at a fast food place and then applying that value when they work professionally as a furniture maker.
Output: Valid
So not only did your source ignore those incedents where firearms were used in a non-harmful way, but they omitted many of the violent uses of self-defence as well!
Output: Valid
The failure to conduct a NICS check would be a felony for licensees and nonlicensees.
Output: Valid
The registration requirement is thus directed principally at those persons who have obtained possession of a firearm without complying with the Act's other requirements, and who therefore are immediately threatened by criminal prosecutions under �_�_ 5851 and 5861.
Output: Valid
Amendment���s right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures would also be incorporated.
Output: Valid
Now that we have Heller/McDonald that clearly expand on Miller, then what will you do with this, concerning the Militia arms?
Output: Valid
So tell me Brady, exactly what gun control laws HAVE saved lives.
Output: Valid
It involved a ban of guns within a certain proximity to schools.
Output: Valid
Even in the Emerson case although the court recognized the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right they didn't apply strict scrutiny (something that would be required if they were dealing with a fundamental right).
Output: Valid
Saw a great article today by Michael Bloomberg (yes, that Michael Bloomberg), about where the illegal guns used in crimes come from - mainly from the states with weak gun control laws.
Output: Valid
A criminal with a gun will feel a lot more confident in committing a crime than a criminal without a gun will just as a criminal will avoid those who have guns and target those who don't.
Output: Valid
However criminal organizations can still smuggle weapons and get assault weapons but the ban on weapons could lower the murder rate and hinder organizations from bulking up with annihilating firepower.
Output: Valid
Although I still think that certain regulations need to be set in place in order to control the distribution of guns, complete gun control is not the answer; however, something still needs to be done.
Output: Valid
Straw Purchase, or stolen, receiving stolen property, illegally transporting a firearms across state lines, gun trafficking, and finally transporting illegal guns across the boarder.
Output: Valid
now imagine if no criminals could get hold of a gun, you wouldn't need a protection, as no criminals have guns.
Output: Valid
Perhaps if other types of firearms were as strictly regulated as machine guns are then we could make some real progress in reducing gun violence and murder.
Output: Valid
Brad, just because the Criminals may be more prepared and we might not have the time to grab our gun that doesnt mean that guns shouldnt be alowed, all your saying is based on circumstances, and luck
Output: Valid
While proximity to the border appears to be a major factor affecting which states are top sources, controlling for population reveals that even among the Southwest border states, certain states export crime guns to Mexico at disproportionately higher rates.
Output: Valid
Another large source of guns used in crimes are unlicensed street dealers who either get their guns through illegal transactions with licensed dealers, straw purchases, or from gun thefts.
Output: Valid
org gun grabber groups, they are ashamed to admit they are gun grabbers and anti Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
Do you understand that any proposed gun control law must pass the strict scrutiny test due to the Second Amendment being recognized as a fundamental right protected by the Constitution?
Output: Valid
So dont you DARE tell me that I have tried to take away anybodies second amendment rights simply because I refuse to pretend that there are rights in the constitution that simply do not exist there.
Output: Valid
In sum, I think it makes more sense that the second amendment applies to right to form a militia, and even when interpreted as an individual right, doesn't appear to prohibit any regulation.
Output: Valid
NYPD pursues all perpetrators and accomplices in gun crimes cases and interrogates them about how their guns were acquired.
Output: Valid
Victoria, a state in Aussie land of antipodeans, garnished an increase of violent crime of 400% the first year of the gun ban.
Output: Valid
The only thing we've been over, is that government and gun control is racist, not the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
As far as guns, it is difficult to say because currently as in the past, you are not allowed to carry a gun on board an aircraft.
Output: Valid
Conditioning / qualifying the right to arms on militia service is disrespecting the fundamental principle of conferred powers and retained rights.
Output: Valid
The right as incorporated is now no longer about guns in the 2A but RIGHTS of citizens which demands compliance with Constitutional principles and strict scrutiny as any other right in the XIVth Amendment or BOR.
Output: Valid
Even if today's well-regulated militia were the National Guard, the Second Amendment still protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Output: Valid
When you compare the number of gun-related deaths of each country, factoring in population size, rates of legal gun ownership, and number of suicide instances, you'll see that America is very much safer than everywhere else.
Output: Valid
I think penfolds basic mentality is that nobody should have guns but criminals and police, and if you face a criminal with a gun, sorry about the bad luck.
Output: Valid
We measured firearm protection as an attempted or completed crime in which the victim reported using a gun to attack or threaten an offender.
Output: Valid
I think that the bad guys will be happy if any gun control law goes into effect, because then there will be less chance of the victum having a weapon for their defense, and the crime rate will rise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Output: Valid
Background checks at gun shows, waiting periods, and restrictions on buying guns in bulk-
Output: Valid
Perhaps if school grounds were more like prisons, with locking gates and electronic monitoring and guard towers and barbed wire fences and random pat downs and metal detectors, then maybe killings on school grounds would be less likely to happen.
Output: Valid
Because most police administrators in Britain are intensely opposed to citizens owning guns, they use the storage law to make acquiring a gun license as onerous as possible.
Output: Valid
Earlier this decade, the NRA persuaded virtually every legislature in the country to permit gun owners to carry concealed firearms ��� only Illinois and Wisconsin still completely forbid concealed guns.
Output: Valid
I agree that a firearm ownership ban coupled with effective confiscation methods would dramatically reduce the number of murders committed by individuals with firearms.
Output: Valid
I think what is also important is that nobody to my knowledge is saying that a law abiding citizen shouldn't have the right to own a gun.
Output: Valid
As far as I am aware, hand guns are illegal outside of the military and police since the Dunblande massacre when a man walked into a school in 1996 and shot a class of children and their teacher.
Output: Valid
There's a total handgun ban in Britain and that's not enough, now the British gun control supporters want a total ban on toy and imitation handguns, even ones that're made from brightly colored plastic.
Output: Valid
JUSTICE STEVENS believes that the unitary meaning of ���keep and bear Arms��� is established by the Second Amendment's calling it a ���right��� (singular) rather than ���rights��� (plural).
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment would be an inexplicable aberration if it were not read to protect individual rights as well.���
Output: Valid
The Court examines the history of felony rights disablements and examines also the procedures and criteria for a felon to have his right to keep and bear arms restored to essentially a pre-felony indictment status . . .
Output: Valid
Do you think that a gun-ban in the long run would mean that more criminals get their hands on guns or that less criminals get their hands on guns?
Output: Valid
It is not the legal gun doing the crime it is the illegaly owned guns, so if you take my guns the criminals have no one to stop them since they have guns we don't.
Output: Valid
I think the gun grabbers have deep seated emotional problems that need dealing with and should be denied their Second Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
Now you're claiming that crooks are getting their guns from gun stores and going through all the hassle and paperwork, just like we do?
Output: Valid
Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem.
Output: Valid
If the second amendment protects a right to rebel, then it means that the people as a whole have a right to rise up and overthrow a tyrranical government rather than an individual like Timothy McVeigh.
Output: Valid
It is interesting to note that the DOJ stats reveal our crimes and murders dropped 63% during the time that the newly "gun free" nations increased and while we were adding many more guns and passing carry laws.
Output: Valid
That is why current federal law specifically forbids registration of gun owners and guns and gun transactions: "any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions.
Output: Valid
Gun owners and civil rights groups did have the tenacity to call it what it is...PRIOR RESTRAINT and unlawful abuse of a right to keep and bear arms and the accesories that go with it...specifically, ammunition.
Output: Valid
These claims are based on deceptive parsing of statistics and disingenuous use of misunderstood ATF nomenclature, to falsely characterize guns recovered from house fires, floods, natural disasters, estates, and gun buybacks as "crime guns."
Output: Valid
(2) a weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
Output: Valid
Gun control proponents essentially concede this fact when they focus their efforts on anti-gun laws and gun reduction policies rather than increased sentencing or enforcement of existing laws.
Output: Valid
Plus do not forget once terrorist kill the unarmed passengers gun hater pilot does not want to allow the victims to hold the airlines responsible for their deaths!
Output: Valid
I believe the MAIN reason we should all support the 2nd amendment is to keep the power of gun ownership in our hands and not in the hands of the government.
Output: Valid
You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
Output: Valid
Rather, if firearms availability does matter, the data consistently show that the way it matters is that more guns equal less violent crime.
Output: Valid
As you have refused to release the names of the participants in your poll there is no way to evaluate whether firearm owners engage in the consumption of alcoholic beverages, or whether they do so while armed.
Output: Valid
While many guns are taken off the street when people are arrested and any firearms in their possession are confiscated, a new study shows how easily arrestees believe they could illegally acquire another firearm.
Output: Valid
People that defend the right to bear arms that demand laws that punish criminals by keeping them in prison thus keeping guns away from them.
Output: Valid
There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
Output: Valid
In addition to the Education Code, the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1995 bars possession of firearms within 1,000 feet of a school, but there are exceptions for private property and for lawful transportation of non-concealable weapons.
Output: Valid
Are you going to suggest that the lawmakers shouldn't be trusted to be armed for their own defense?
Output: Valid
As it is pretty much a democracy, then it is the right of the people to waive their own rights.
Output: Valid
'Gun control' does not mean a ban on all self-defence
Output: Valid
If you are ready to set aside your preference for the government taking away all my firearms and both of my children then say so and we will discuss things rationally.
Output: Valid
I will agree with you on one point though; A heart of evil resides in those who would presume they can undermine, subvert, or take away another indivdiual's rights as are enumerated in the U.S. Constitution...
Output: Valid
Australia's laws mandating that all guns be kept locked up, and the lack of the ability to claim self-defense when shooting a violent home invader, has made Australia a very dangerous place to live or visit.
Output: Valid
If you remember back to the old thread you will notice a large number of studies, including the otherall NAS study in 2004, that show either an unknown correlation, no correlation, or increase in certain crimes.
Output: Valid
Open carry is very common in some Western states, especially so around big game season, and in those areas with high cougar (mountain lion) populations.
Output: Valid
It also give the right to equipment with which you could execute murders, armed robberies and other violent crime.
Output: Valid
....that some imaginative authors created fantasy stories wherein guns were unnecessary for the champions to win?
Output: Valid
This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
Output: Valid
What would happen would essentially be declaring war against the American people, telling them that they have no right to live should they ever face danger, that their only legal recourse is to lay down and die.
Output: Valid
Most gun owners are just ordinary people who happen to own a firearm.
Output: Valid
I can testify that the AMA has been moving steadily to the left in a variety of issues, from the perversion of medical ethics to gun control.
Output: Valid
I do see the sense in some measures such as restricting access to guns for people who have committed violent crimes.
Output: Valid
I suggest you examine today's societies and show an example of the poor classes being able to own weapons as freely as the higher classes.
Output: Valid
It is the finger that pulls the trigger that kills, not the gun.
Output: Valid
Why is New York trying to force this man to do something that he's not required to by law, and they have no legal authority to punish him if he refuses to comply?
Output: Valid
It's clear that legalizing guns in DC has resulted in lower homicide rates.
Output: Valid
I think the 2nd Amendment does apply to modern guns.
Output: Valid
On lie the gun haters use to justify a ban is that the weapons in question are being used illegally and so widespread that thousands of lives are threatened.
Output: Valid
Furthermore, as I am sure you are aware, the British police do not carry firearms, and they defend themselves equally well against attacks from criminals armed with lethal weapons.
Output: Valid
Some people will argue that there should be little or no gun regulation, while others will argue that there should be as much regulation as the courts will allow.
Output: Valid
Even if true, During the "civil rights" era, Gun control laws were enacted to keep blacks from owning guns, such terms as Saturday night specials refer to afro-centric themes.
Output: Valid
DC doesn't need to have an age restriction on gun ownership, because no matter what their laws say, you still have to be at least 18 to pass a federal background check to buy a gun.
Output: Valid
If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
Output: Valid
None are so fearful as those who need to have guns and more guns and more guns and more and more ammo, and assault weapons.
Output: Valid
If the current practices of Washington DC regarding gun ownership were fully constitutional, lawful, and allowable under the Heller ruling, then there would be no point for introducing legislation that would force DC to stop its practices immediately.
Output: Valid
No it's federal law that you have to run background checks in order to keep your FFL (federal firearms license) which allows you to legally sell guns.
Output: Valid
What I don't get is why gay rights groups, neo nazis, white supremacists, pro-abortionists and war protesters all get treated with response and dignity, but groups of gun owners are treated like third class citizens.
Output: Valid
Do doctors really need to ask patients and their children if they own guns before applying a one size fits all approach to warning new parents about potential dangers for their children?
Output: Valid
Bad Gun control are things that hinder a lawfull person from being able to purchase and use firearms.
Output: Valid
And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
Output: Valid
The bill would also protect gun manufacturers and dealers that have allowed their weapons to fall into the hands of criminals through their own negligence.
Output: Valid
I have also started collecting some otehr interesting doodads, like gardner guns, and have extended my gatling gun collection (gatling guns are NOT nfa weapons and are wholly uncontrolled) by 1 belt fed .308.
Output: Valid
if one wants to own a gun i have no qualms with them but if they wish to own guns such as a AK47 and AK74u they should be dealt with in a more civilized manner to protect the people.
Output: Valid
However, even though there were less deaths, there was a surge in gun crime, death and non-death related, after the ban on guns.
Output: Valid
He realizes that an individual rights interpretation or a ruling that the states are bound by the Second Amendment could still leave the door open for plenty of gun control.
Output: Valid
Those who claim that Australia suffered a "crime wave" as a result of new gun laws often cite as evidence unrelated figures for common assault or sexual assault (no weapon) and armed robbery (any weapon).
Output: Valid
Does anyone wonder why, of all the personal right's our Constitution has afforded to every American as individual's, that the Second Amendment is the first right to be targeted for a complete removal by members of the Government.
Output: Valid
Just remember that "in the name of protecting the country from violent enemies" politicians want to pass a bill that will ban gun ownership to anybody whose name is in the suspected terrorist watchlist.
Output: Valid
Read the article, it is about why guns are vilified and the evil deadly cars that kill far more kids then guns are not!
Output: Valid
Gun grabbers are woefully ignorant and sometimes find an unwitting accompliice in corrupt courts and prosecutors who ignore the law in favor of their own prejudices.
Output: Valid
If anything, it has ruled in favor of gun control, saying in the Miller case that "The Second Amendment must be interpreted and applied with a view to its purpose of rendering effective the Militia."
Output: Valid
They argue that the second amendment allows the people the power of weapons so that if the government intrudes on their rights they can defend themselves.
Output: Valid
That would theoretically work except the fact that more knife murders may occur then and perhaps guns will be brought in illegally to murder people.
Output: Valid
I believe that people should have the right to own a gun.
Output: Valid
there are thousands of stories where armed citizens stop criminals, in many cases without firing a shot and just showing the gun.
Output: Valid
A firearm in mearley an inanimate piece of steel that has no mind of its own and cant function without the intervention of human control over it.
Output: Valid
I have some experience in dealing with violent crime, and in my opinion we do not have a gun violence problem in America, we have a violence problem in general.
Output: Valid
The PA constitution has provisions for both duty to serve and Right to bear arms, A provision from Address of PA Minority contains defense of state as well as hunting so clearly both individual and collective purposes.
Output: Valid
These dumb politicians dont live in the real world, they ban legally owned guns thinking that the criminal also has a legaly owned gun, doh.
Output: Valid
We tell them what was meant when the law passed, but even these gun owners do not care what was meant, they only care what the law says!
Output: Valid
We've also seen the comparison made between a few rouge concealed carry holders and terrorists on airplanes, and the suggestion that the actions of the few should be used to punish the many.
Output: Valid
Hate groups like the one gun hater pilot is a member can only do this when they cannot defend their position!
Output: Valid
Police officers around here don't generally use or carry guns and, in any case, knowing what the police are like I wouldn't trust them looking after kids anyway.
Output: Valid
This study has been cited by gun proponents before as support for the tempting cross-national assumption that: ���England severely restricts gun possession and sees a rise in robbery rates that now exceeds armed America.���
Output: Valid
In Mexico, narcotraffickers and other criminals probably also get a substantial amount of US arms from Mexican police and military depots, either through theft or purchases from corrupt state servants.
Output: Valid
Germany has much stricter laws than America does when it comes to gun ownership, and their school shootings resulted in more death and devastation that Columbine.
Output: Valid
You're the one who has to explain why the US crime rates are so high when other countries manage to have guns and not go nuts.
Output: Valid
If guns would be made illegal, then only criminals would have them.
Output: Valid
All gun free zones can do, is keep law-abiding citizens from having guns.
Output: Valid
So how is controlling the law-abiding going to help when murder is already illegal, it is already illegal for a convicted criminal to be even in the same room as a gun.
Output: Valid
As it stands now there's not a lot of evidence to support the belief that keeping guns off of campus will reduce the opportunity for violent incidents to occur.
Output: Valid
Even though he says he's neither in the collective or individual column he is clearly in the collective column simply by suggesting that the right to bear arms requires you to be in the militia (which SCOTUS disagrees with.)
Output: Valid
We already have more than enough gun Laws and Although I haven't personally checked the statistics I would be willing to bet that most of these Laws that were passed haven't made a big difference in stopping crimes.
Output: Valid
Furthermore the supreme court ruled in Heller that the ownership of firearms is tied to matters such as personal defense.
Output: Valid
When will gun makers realize that they bear a responsibility to make sure that their products do not mete out preventable deaths, and that they do not warrant nor deserve special protection from the law to avoid that burden?
Output: Valid
If a criminal steals a legally purchased gun from a law abiding gun owner, we are still faced with a situation where the criminal's actions and intent are to blame, not the gun itself.
Output: Valid
Speculation about the flaws in surveys estimating large numbers of defensive gun uses resemble UFO buffs' beliefs that the federal government captured aliens from other worlds at Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
Output: Valid
Would they be willing to accept relaxed restrictions on ownership and purchasing of firearms that they do not consider to be assault weapons?
Output: Valid
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Output: Valid
That's why there are amendments like the second, and why the Negro is no longer 3/5 a person, and 18 year olds, women, and minorities can vote).
Output: Valid
,   and I was being kind when I say there was no change in the murder rate, The Anti-gun argument was that at least England���s gun control will stop mass shootings.
Output: Valid
If gun control as a public policy worked at all, we would have lower rates of crimes with guns than in 1968.
Output: Valid
However, given existing work on the adverse impact of other safety laws, such as safety caps for storing medicine, even the very plausible assumption of reduced accidental gun deaths cannot be taken for granted.
Output: Valid
It would appear that it is the Brits, rather than ���the Gun Nuts��� who ���claim that when guns are banned people will just use knives instead���.
Output: Valid
If a registered gun owner uses his gun to commit a crime, (besides running the risk of threatening armed citizens) he would be easily tracked down and apprehended.
Output: Valid
The right to carry concealed weapons across state lines exists only in the fertile constitutional imagination of the gun lobby.
Output: Valid
The police have absolutely no way of telling who is in possession of an illegal and unregistered firearm, and there's not a law that California can pass to do a thing about it.
Output: Valid
If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
Output: Valid
There will be more guns on the street whether the Court hears the case or not or regardless of how the Court might rule: gun laws don���t effect criminals.
Output: Valid
Or that the Second Amendment only keeps the federal government from passing new gun control laws?
Output: Valid
In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
Output: Valid
So if you want to ban guns, 1,531,764 people will get killed or injured, and you'll only take guns out of the hands of those who don't even commit gun crimes.
Output: Valid
It certainly would not be mandatory to carry a gun, so just suppose that the only armed people to climb onto the plane one particular day are the terrorists.
Output: Valid
It is a bunch of people (by a bunch I mean like 30%, 70% including even conservatives are for better gun control) falling for an NRA campaign whose only, only, only goal is to sell more guns.
Output: Valid
* Slightly modified variants of military firearms that would otherwise be illegal to sell on the civilian market, including semiautomatic versions of military assault weapons, such as civilian AR-15 and AK-47 assault rifle models.
Output: Valid
The gun industry should be protected against lawsuits because criminal gun dealers who sell firearms to child killers are law abiding, model citizens according to the NRA.
Output: Valid
I have trouble believing that these guys, who had just overthrown a tyranical government and who ALL owned military rifles were drafting an amendment to the constitution that would prohibit future generations of Americans from having the same individual rights.
Output: Valid
The courts are not the right setting for the current battle of gun control supporters vs gun rights supporters.
Output: Valid
Established case law makes clear that the federal Constitution grants appellant no right to carry a concealed handgun.
Output: Valid
Even without this preamble the second amendment would still only protect a right in connection with militia service.
Output: Valid
The Eighth Amendment specifically forbids excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishment; your proposal that all guns be regulated in a manner best fitting machine guns qualifies as both excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.
Output: Valid
Require gun owners to alert police if their guns are lost or stolen...
Output: Valid
THey also believe that ALL guns can XXXX people apart and even an untrained person with a gun can shoot as accurately as the military.
Output: Valid
Owning a gun will not protect me from government abuse (you really don΂t think you could stand a chance against the governments ARMED FORCES with TANKS, ARTILLERY, WAR-PLANES, WMDs, and WELL-TRAINED PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS).
Output: Valid
Crime rates equals criminals which means if guns are illegal, they must be getting them from somewhere, hmmm, i wonder where, black market or illegal selling across borders anyone?
Output: Valid
It's absurd to think that the Second Amendment was intended to protect a right to commit a crime.
Output: Valid
Surely it would help keep guns from going into illegal circulation if individual guns were registered to owners, and any change of ownership also had to be registered, like we do with cars in the UK.
Output: Valid
It's illogical to assume that you don't have a right to protect yourself when you're at the top of the food chain.
Output: Valid
So... you feel that the sale of a type of gun could not have been banned if people didn't need permits in the first place?
Output: Valid
The language itself is not dubious or ambiguous: ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.���
Output: Valid
most research indicates social deprivation as being main causes of crime coupled nowadays with drugs
Output: Valid
including: requiring years of repeated violations before ATF can revoke the
Output: Valid
By calling penalties "civil" rather than "criminal," government can seize all of your assets without trial or any other form of legal proceeding.
Output: Valid
Until we start treating this as the civil right it is and drop the intimmidation what exactly do you think will change the status quo?
Output: Valid
Would that be guns and people, or just the person?
Output: Valid
In Afganistan AK-47 are being produced with tooling no more advanced than the production of horseshoes.
Output: Valid
You would be surprised how many places you can legally buy everything from machine guns to anti tank missiles.
Output: Valid
The beginning part of the Second Amendment doesn't determine what its sole nature is about.
Output: Valid
You've already admitted that the government will carry out genocidal actions against us if they feel like it, so why should we make it easy for them?
Output: Valid
(8 & 7 respectivly with one in the pipe) I have mounted a small mag-lite flashlight underneath the mag tube for shedding light on anything that might go bump in the night.
Output: Invalid
First off, explain exactly how the militia groups qualify as unconstitutional.
Output: Valid
The allusion was to some kind of mental problem that makes someone buy far more weapons and ammunition than they could possibly need for sport or self-defense.
Output: Valid
Not really, because my argument is that banning guns doesn't make anyone safer.
Output: Valid
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
Output: Valid
If I ever prepare for "Needing" to shoot more than 6 rounds in a situation, I would bring a rifle.
Output: Valid
2007), and applied it as a generic ���justification��� defense, stating that self-defense, duress, and necessity all fit ���under a single, unitary rubric: justification.���
Output: Valid
Although it's more likely he'll be found not competent to stand trial, or not capable of aiding in his defense.
Output: Invalid
* The NRA uses Eddie Eagle as a lobbying tool in its efforts to derail the passage of child access prevention (CAP) and mandatory trigger lock laws on both the state and federal levels.
Output: Valid
And a right to security would also involve not having a neighbour who's armed to the teeth - because I'd be worried about him getting bad news from the wife or something to push him over the edge.
Output: Valid
I posted the real story of the Ft. Hood incident and also a quote that only a good man with a gun can stop a bad man with a gun.
Output: Valid
I will give a list of the most restrictive states and the least restrictive states and arrange them by the number of violent crimes per 100,000 people.
Output: Valid
sure you can kill with other things, but most homicide weapons are guns.
Output: Valid
No mortal man has the right to deny me the ability to maintain life within my body.
Output: Valid
(b) the conduct is not a reasonable response in the circumstances as he or she perceives them, but the person believes the conduct is necessary:
Output: Valid
With the prohibition against releasing firearms trace data to the public at large, we will not know the answer.
Output: Valid
Unless the people have the ability to make the government stop and take note of their will and their wishes, the Bill of Rights amounts to nothing.
Output: Valid
All I gotta say is that this is complete BS, the need to use because they have them that's what the range is for.
Output: Valid
Additionally, laws were rewritten in hopes of preventing such a thing from happening again.
Output: Invalid
I disagree with the concept of permits, but this "side" of the debate more closely matches my opinion than the other side, which advocates for complete gun control.
Output: Valid
What I find most interesting about American gun-freaks is their rigidity of thinking, violence of expression, paranoia and hysteria, and their inability to budge from preconceived notions.
Output: Valid
And Obama, going to foreign nations, bowing before dictators, and allowing them to accuse our nations of various crimes, and having the nerve to apologize for them.
Output: Valid
How many of them grew up watching movies of Sylvester Stallone mowing down people with automatic gunfire, and movies where gangbangers has MAC-10s and bazookas?
Output: Valid
Most just have tools no more advanced than making horse shoes.
Output: Invalid
You are insistant upon blindly trudging onward until you are beaten into a position where there is no come back such as your ill fated expediton in claiming Belesillies as a valid source.
Output: Valid
The ATF lacks authority to read into existing law, new language that does not exist, or to make its own laws.
Output: Valid
In March, officers began soliciting registered firearm owners across the city as part of what they call the Safe City Project.
Output: Valid
Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
Output: Valid
There is no debate as none of you have offered evidence that in Australia it's illegal to use your firearms in self-defense.
Output: Valid
One anti-gun Commenter asked: "Can anyone could name another mass murder that DIDN'T include guns?"
Output: Valid
Only if responsible citizens are armed can we insure that massacres like this wont run on until the killer is down to his last bullet which he uses on himself anyway.
Output: Valid
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a 2nd Amendment challenge to such draconian laws in Washington, D.C.
Output: Valid
It's a big object and takes considerable movement to operate, not something an American accustomed to our firearms would realize off-hands since it's complete away from the grip area and an odd shape.
Output: Valid
If the guns owned by the minutemen were part of military equipment then they couldn't be owned by the people, rather just borrowed, and only for a specific event and time.
Output: Valid
Congress added those protections in 1789, and in 1791 twothirds of the states ratified the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which became known as the Bill of Rights."
Output: Valid
Collectors and people with legitimate cultural, religious or military reasons to own swords will be exempted from the ban, but must store them under lock and key and have a burglar alarm.
Output: Valid
If the existence and availability of weapons was truly the problem then someone shooting at the White House would have happened much sooner in our nation's history, and with much greater frequency.
Output: Valid
Both show numbers between societies with differing amounts of firearms ownership.
Output: Valid
I guess you either didnt see or chose to ignore the part about a gun on its own being no more dangerous than popsicle sticks, hence the words on its own.
Output: Valid
It doesn't appear that gun control laws nor a strong government can stop gang nor criminal activity in any country, India nor Mexico.
Output: Valid
In another thread, a person used the term "potential criminals" to describe gun owners.... EVERYONE is a potential criminal!
Output: Valid
If one looks at the charts �_ of the way down the page one can see that the gun ban did little to stop the upward spiral of homicides.
Output: Valid
The following is a purely self-indulgent digression into a topic which, although raised here, has nothing to do with gun control...
Output: Invalid
He was ready to push as we walked quickly past the long row of tables covered with guns and ammunition, past the woman collecting money for admission.
Output: Valid
The number of guns owned by civilians is around 25 million, or 30.3 firearms per 100 people.
Output: Valid
You keep claiming that you're not of the anti-gun camp, that you actually support the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
If the scene you outlined happened at a security check point, I would not get aboard the plane, and I would not stop them, if NO laws are broken.
Output: Valid
Establishment of gun-free-zones is not in conflict with our right to bear arms.
Output: Valid
We could hypothesize that if guns are banned then law abiding citizens who usually didn't carry or own guns before the ban will be less likely to face armed opponents.
Output: Valid
Neither you nor your side will admit that criminals use guns or other weapons to rob banks or citizens for money or other valuables to support their drug habits or other criminal achievements.
Output: Valid
Illinois is a gun control haven, the laws are very strict, various models of firearms are banned from civilian ownership, licenses of various kinds are needed for possession and purchasing, and there are no private sales, etc.
Output: Valid
Gun bans simple ban law abiding citizens from having guns.
Output: Valid
I do not believe OTHERS should not have guns, I think criminals and psychos who are yet to convict a gun crime should not have guns.
Output: Valid
and who commits crimes, Criminals, so if you take guns away from law abiding citizens insuring that criminals will still be able to get weapons will have more targets to attack because people don't have any defense against criminals.
Output: Valid
The logic of less guns in law abiding citizens hands means less gun crime is clearly insane.
Output: Valid
Are you saying that the only reason there are criminals armed with guns is because we're not willing to accept gun prohibitions as the answer?
Output: Valid
Explain exactly how the judges ruling that the Second Amendment is truly an individual right, how DC's ban on handgun ownership and their trigger lock requirements being unconstitutional, would in any way suggest that one-gun-a-month laws pass constitutional muster.
Output: Valid
Since that ruling most lower federal courts have continued to reject the argument that the second amendment protects an indivual right to own a gun.
Output: Valid
They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites.
Output: Valid
What stupid Americans like you don't understand is that revoking the Second Amendment wouldn't play any part on protecting anyone from criminals that're armed with guns.
Output: Valid
To inact a law that makes a crime of illegal gun ownership has no effect on criminal ownership of guns.
Output: Valid
In America, every state that has enacted restrictive gun control has seen an increase in crime, police brutality, questionable law enforcement practices such as violations of 4th amendment rights and so on.
Output: Valid
These are the people that believe in bigger government, nanny states, government handouts, less responsibility for people, less freedom for the people, more laws, even more laws after that, legalizing all manner of drugs and behaviors while outlawing others, etc.
Output: Valid
Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns by law.
Output: Valid
Georgia's concealed carry law has recently been modified to allow permitted gun owners to carry concealed weapons into restuarants, on mass transit, in state parks and other venues previously off limits to any non-law-enforcement weapons.
Output: Valid
Gun registration schemes have been disabled for criminals because requiring them to register a gun they are forbidden to own would violate their 5th Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
The second amendment is not primarily there to protect our right to keep hunting weapons.
Output: Valid
The theory is that reducing the overall number of handguns will somehow reduce gun crime, which is a little like saying that reducing the overall number of cars will reduce drunk driving.
Output: Valid
Excluding males over 44 and most females means that more than half the population is excluded.
Output: Invalid
There wasn't a year of high school I didn't have a part-time job during the school year and full-time summers.
Output: Invalid
There's no constitutional right to NOT be offender by someone's opinion.
Output: Valid
So you have to read the 2nd amendment as a whole.
Output: Valid
What I mentioned about the liberals refers only to government powers not granted by the constitution.
Output: Valid
However, if you carry into California then you are restricted by ���the same conditions or limitations that apply to residents of that state.���
Output: Valid
You implied that I was a stupid, vicous, reckless monster, you parrot the same thing no matter how many times we refute it, then you wonder why people lose patience with you.
Output: Invalid
As a woman and statistically the most likely to be a victim in such an encounter you wouldn't oppose possible solutions to domestic violence would you?
Output: Valid
I'm not saying what works here will work there, but if you can make assumptions based off numbers, the same ones can be made right back at your society.
Output: Valid
For what need do you feel it's necessary to monitor the law-abiding like they're criminals and dangerous to the general public?
Output: Valid
And to respond to you, those childre n are orhans now because their father was killed not able to defend himself.
Output: Valid
Burglars can sue homeowners if they are hurt by houshold hazards.
Output: Valid
Giles Hattersley finds out why so many young people feel obliged to carry knives.
Output: Invalid
(squares are indeed 4 sided, but not all 4 sided objects are squares.
Output: Invalid
Why did Mr. Cheney accept in silence the certain knowledge of the incredible odds against al Qaeda's knowing *when* to piggyback four hijackings onto the back of those wargames?
Output: Valid
Are you gonna claim that he too was brainwashed by the right wing conservatives?
Output: Valid
Please say yes and help us expose the frauds of gun control.
Output: Invalid
In 2006, the Sacramento Police Department discovered these ordinances are unused in the cities that have them.
Output: Valid
The Constitution of Pennsylvania, as adopted August 16, 1776, stated the right thus:
Output: Valid
The PA Minority also offered two provisions, one for an unambiguously individual right and another that the state could arm/train militia if Congress neglected.
Output: Valid
You can debate that without guns there would be more deaths to other weapons although you can't debate it would be to the same extent as gun murders and crimes would be.
Output: Valid
The gun control mentality that a felon is too dangerous to be allowed to legally buy a gun, yet they're not dangerous enough to take out of the public no matter how heinous a crime they've committed.
Output: Valid
Though in my state I have been a gun owner for more than 30 years and have watched gun control work since the Bartly Fox laws were inacted and diffrent factors that changed the law and it's meaning.
Output: Valid
We need to preach gun responsibility, teach owners to lock up their guns, or hide them away, not have them easily obtainable for whoever wishes to pick them up.
Output: Valid
If there was even a modicum of truth to their insane, illogical beliefs on gun ownership, wouldn���t they have numerous examples of violent outbreaks to point to in all the states that allow people to carry concealed handguns?
Output: Valid
Well the Supreme Court has specifically stated that the Second Amendment is about self-defense and other lawful purposes, and a sports gun is a poor choice for a self-defense weapon.
Output: Valid
The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.
Output: Valid
First, the ruling was that the Second Amendment only applied to firearms that had a militia purposes and that the sawed-off shotgun in question didn't have any evidence of being suitable for a militia.
Output: Valid
Screw "putting more guns on the street", how about we give gun owners more rights and more legal opportunities to use them and stop pandering to the criminals.
Output: Valid
You have no idea how much such a program would cost with the need of more police, more man hours, more vehicles, more facilities, more technology and tools, less civil rights, less legal protections, etc.
Output: Valid
You argue that the ban worked, yet at the same time you claim that gun makers found a way around the law, releasing the same weapons as before but in a way that made them technically legal.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment was never about individual gun ownership, it's only purpose was proper case of a government organized and controlled militia."
Output: Valid
Not only will the criminals still have access to guns, but they will also have the added knowledge that either the person they intend to rob does not have a gun or they are breaking the law.
Output: Valid
Then compare it to areas with less gun control laws, such as Texas and Arizona (where concealed carry permits are fairly easy to obtain).
Output: Valid
In my view I think that complete gun control helps solve a major problem in crime and it would allow people to feel safer because they wouldn't need to have a gun to protect themselves.
Output: Valid
Assuming the 66 percent figure is correct that would mean 1,224 of Chicago's 1854 homicides were committed with a gun, in a city where handgun ownership and possession was both illegal and punishable.
Output: Valid
Crash resistant car designs are created to save lives, guns (though they may occasionally save lives) are primarily weapons, designed to hurt or kill.
Output: Valid
Sticks and stones, lions and spears, swords, telephone cords, screwdrivers, cannons, canyons, burning them alive, cement shoes, pillows, pens, guns... The methods may change, but the fact remains - some people will kill, (or harm) other people.
Output: Valid