niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
For even if we were to conclude that the Eighth Amendment imposes some substantive limitations on the National Legislature's powers in this area, we would still hold that the Bail Reform Act is valid.
Output: Valid
It does seem that the classification has changed to include the threat of a gun rather than just shootings, so I���m not certain how comparable the figures are.
Output: Valid
Do you see a problem with having to get a license to own and maintain a blog, or go to belong to a religion that's not exactly popular with other people and controversial in nature?
Output: Valid
Unfortunately, the NRA likes to weaken gun laws with loopholes and makes them harder to enforce.
Output: Valid
You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).
Output: Valid
A new consensus on the meaning of the Second Amendment appears to be crystallizing among constitutional scholars.
Output: Valid
American homicide data are based on arrests, but British data are based on final dispositions.
Output: Valid
Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
Output: Valid
* 74% of felons polled agreed that "one reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear being shot during the crime.
Output: Valid
I was under the impression that congress chose not to ban machine guns because they felt taxing them would be a great scheme to make money.
Output: Valid
The case above involves gun ownership that may have attracted criminals.
Output: Valid
Let me clear this up right now, I'm not saying that your average citizen can not responsibly own and operate guns.
Output: Valid
also, a gun is only dangerous if its used by the wrong person.
Output: Valid
This they cannot do without abandoning the more guns = more crime myth.
Output: Valid
It's also worth mentioning that several of those shootings were stopped by private citizens using their own guns or kids who knew enough about guns to tackle the shooter when he had to reload.
Output: Valid
Like many gun control laws, Canada's Firearms Act was peddled as a badly needed "tool" against crime.
Output: Valid
The gun lobby likes to give lip service to the idea of rights and freedom but every time they oppose reasonable safety measures intended to protect people's rights they show where they really stand.
Output: Valid
Second, the only reason that you would bother notifying the police is if you think there is some possibility that the person will be charged with trying to illegally obtain a gun.
Output: Valid
For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
Output: Valid
Gun control does nothing to make anyone safer or save lives.
Output: Valid
If your position was owning a gun is too important an issue to be subject to the people's will so we want to take it out of their hands then it would be a consistent and honest position.
Output: Valid
The threats and crimes committed by these "upstanding citizens," as the gun lobby likes to call concealed handgun permit holders, are no surprise.
Output: Valid
So unless one is prepared to argue that civilians should have the right to own similar weaponry, heavy artillery, even nuclear weapons, this argument must fall.
Output: Valid
This high-risk group can legally acquire guns in the secondary market, even though they are prohibited from doing so in the primary gun market.
Output: Valid
"Unfortunately, 17 states now have these so-called safe storage laws," then-Yale Law School senior research scholar John Lott, author of the book "More Guns, Less Crime," told me at the time.
Output: Valid
A ban on open carry however is a much different issue: it does not at all interfere with the Heller decision, nor does it cross step the 2nd Amendment.
Output: Valid
On average, the states that have done the most to regulate private gun sales appear to have lower firearm death rates and lower firearm homicide rates.
Output: Valid
People constantly trumpet about how having a gun means that they can protect themselves, but first they must be able to fire the gun on another human being, something that most people find hard to do.
Output: Valid
And no person should be subjected to unwarranted interrogation by a physician in response to the actions of criminals that the judicial system will not keep locked up.
Output: Valid
The ought to be designated as laws not preventative but fearful of crimes, produced by the tumultuous impression of a few isolated facts, and not by thoughtful consideration of the inconveniences and advantages of a universal decree."
Output: Valid
As I think some people who wuv their guns would just XXXX the ignorant politician away with their newly illegal gun.
Output: Valid
Just to be clear, you're saying that only gun laws, somehow, are unable to deter criminal acts?
Output: Valid
What factors affect the demand, Mayor Bloomberg, of the criminals in your city for guns that provides such a large and profitable market for gun runners?
Output: Valid
Combining the defensive killings and nonfatal woundings, there are about 7,700 to 18,500 reported legal shootings of criminals a year, which would be less than 1% of all defensive gun uses.
Output: Valid
Owning a gun is a safety precaution, just like locking your door at night.
Output: Valid
It's called the First Amendment, and it guarantees my right to free speech in stronger terms than 2A protects your imagined right to own firearms.
Output: Valid
If people are smoking themselves to death then that is their business, but if people are murdering each other with guns then there is more reason for government intervention.
Output: Valid
The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by congress. "
Output: Valid
It's pretty easy to find information on the FBI and the CDC websites that shows that more people die in gun accidents than criminals die in legally justifiable self defense shootings.
Output: Valid
A disproportionate number of survey respondents were criminals, hence the correlation between gun ownership and murder.
Output: Valid
The courts decided that it was legal for Ms. Love to purchase a handgun although they denied her claim that the second amendment protected handgun ownership.
Output: Valid
Mine are rights, theirs are crimes and a man in the right is justified in using deadly force to protect his life and rights.
Output: Valid
I see, so banning guns just stops law abiding citizens from having them, yet your family of criminals buys them from people who legally obtained them, or has them legally obtained for them.
Output: Valid
Do you have any proof that would support your claim that gun owners aren't taking proper care to ensure that their guns don't get stolen?
Output: Valid
And we've already presented, countless times in the past, that all evidence points to less than 1% of guns recovered from crimes being traced back to gun shows.
Output: Valid
In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.
Output: Valid
The claim by the anti gun lobby that guns are used more often in crime than in self defence is and old one.
Output: Valid
Moreover, the number of fatal gun accidents fell, over the years, while the number of guns was increasing by tens of millions.
Output: Valid
As the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence, the Brady Campaign, with its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, works to enact and enforce sensible gun laws, regulations and public policies.
Output: Valid
The fact is all gun rights organizations stress safety first, it's not their fault some XXXXX failed to follow procedures.
Output: Valid
(2)When the firearm is an unloaded pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed on the person and is in a locked container or within the locked trunk of a motor vehicle.
Output: Valid
And now, as I ask you to provide a more realistic quote, I also ask you how military actions are relevant to whether or not we should be able to own guns.
Output: Valid
By the way, you forgot army tanks, and military jet fighters, grenade launchers, military attack helos, and land owners who keep aircraft carriers in their stock tanks, or how about people using their chimneys for missle silos.
Output: Valid
Gun Control does not work, well unless you mean by working that crime sky rockets in which case I would have to agree with you and then question your motives as to why you would want it here.
Output: Valid
I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.
Output: Valid
No barrels need to be destroyed, all that needs to be done to defeat the system is have discrepancies between original manufacturer's supplied projectile on record for a certain serial number gun and the crime scene recovered projectile.
Output: Valid
Your endless request for more and more gun control is not justified.
Output: Invalid
Those 50% of sellers not required to give background checks selll hot dogs, not guns.
Output: Valid
Typically states with laxed CCW laws already had a lower crime rate so there was not much room for a drop in crime thus they had a drop not as much as the onces with strict CCW laws.
Output: Valid
My point was: THERE ARE PLACES WHERE PEOPLE IN GENERAL...LAW ABIDING OR CRIMINAL SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CARRY GUNS.
Output: Valid
Mexico obviously have some gunshow, gun loophole and need to pass a law to stop this behavior of their citizens emoticonXHoho
Output: Valid
If movie theatres had metal detectors, and gun lockers (for a small fee) then perhaps gun nuts would complain to the management about noisy patrons, like normal people do, and not murder them.
Output: Valid
Only why would you need gun registration if guns were illegal?
Output: Valid
There is nothing unclear about the restrictive clause of the 2nd Amendment nor is there any ambiguity that no power was ever granted to the federal government to have any interest whatsoever in the personal arms of the private citizen.
Output: Valid
It seems certain we agree that responsible firearm ownership should be taught and encouraged to those who own firearms (believe it or not, this is what the NRA primarily does).
Output: Valid
Should guns be controlled, that would give people the right to demand that you surrender your weapons, just as the state currently demends that you hand over all terrorists, drugs and illegal material.
Output: Valid
Licenses to buy are BS, gun registration should not be manditory, waiting periods should not as prevelant as they are... and carry & conceal laws are an infringement on our rights.
Output: Valid
I would also argue that one's person is also private property, therefore, if one is legally allowed to own a firearm, one should be legally allowed to posess it on one's person.
Output: Valid
The second is important because in the past many states have had restrictions for concealed carry that were related to the education requirement.
Output: Valid
Although I think a gun-ban should be effective since you can΂t eliminate criminality entirely, and it΂s the criminals, lunatics and otherwise unbalanced people that you don΂t want to have guns or have an easy time getting guns.
Output: Valid
i wouldn't want to get shot with anything waring onr of those, they are only for fragments, not bullets, also the hand gun is not the worry, rifles with small rounds will defete a vest easly.
Output: Valid
Or that someone has pointed out that gun rights advocates seem to have been panic-buying firearms in case the White House bans them?
Output: Valid
But since the student in question parked on a public road, meaning it was city property, outside of designated school owned and leased property, the weapon wasn't on school property and the expulsion isn't legal.
Output: Valid
Which gun right laws do you support?The right to ban them?you are as anti-gun as they come.Galileo no offense, because you make no pretense about it.
Output: Valid
A recent example of how gun control really saved a situation check out something that happened in Sydney recently thats not too unlike the School attacks that have resulted in massacres in the USA
Output: Valid
I like how anti gun people say we need to protect everyone from the rare gun events by banning guns, but when someone suggests banning the more frequent hammer and club attacks, they can justify those deaths.
Output: Valid
Therefore nobody should have access to firearms trace data for civil actions, as they pose absolutely no relevance of any sort to fighting crime, and are designed only for bankrupting firearms companies.
Output: Valid
Old sliiiick wants to do anything he can get by with to cause gun owners any pain, tax, penalty or control to make gun owners uncomfortable in their right to keep and bear arms.
Output: Valid
Criminals enter gun free zones with guns to commit crimes against unarmed law-abiding citizens.
Output: Valid
If guns are more advanced now, then that's all the more reason we should have the right to defend ourselves against them, not less.
Output: Valid
Violence and crime are higher among black than white, lower-income than middle- or upper-income, young than middle-aged, single than married, and urban than rural individuals - all contrary to the pattern of gun ownership.
Output: Valid
In effect, theyask the Court to hold the right to keep and bear arms as subject to adifferent body of rules for incorporation than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.
Output: Valid
Citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.
Output: Valid
Attorney General John Ashcroft, for example, says that the second amendment protects an individual right to bear arms, but he has also stated that he supports the extension of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban.
Output: Valid
If a patient chooses to exercise their fifth amendment rights and not answer a doctor's questions -questions that contain no legitimate basis or medical relevancy- then the doctor can then refuse services to them in response as punishment.
Output: Valid
Instead of heaping more onerous restrictions upon good citizens or law-abiding gun dealers who are not the source of crime guns, is it not more reasonable - though admittedly more difficult - to target the real source of crime guns?
Output: Valid
Less than 1% of guns wind up in crime situations and crime has dropped with more gun and continues to drop despite agressive prosecution.
Output: Valid
This is just as unrealistic a view that saying gun laws will prevent all crime- of course some criminals will not obey the law- that is what makes them criminals!
Output: Valid
The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
Output: Valid
What I wonder is, if citizens/subjects are supposed to defend themselves with their bare hands (because guns are heavily regulated and knives are next ) why do police need to shoot people to stop them from causing harm?
Output: Valid
The most important thing gun grabbers would like to ignore and gloss over is that the individual and fundamental right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS is now incorporated in the XIVth Amendment of Civil Rights.
Output: Valid
An English study of the availability of Illegal Guns done 10 years after enacting what is called the most restrictive gun control in the Western World,   Shotguns for Σ50: study reveals weapons culture
Output: Valid
Criminals do not need guns to continue with their crime and murders, guns are most useful in the hands of an armed citizenry as the incorporation case patiently explained.
Output: Valid
I support a persons right to own a gun but if people start getting too many freedoms dealing with their weapons then things could get worse.
Output: Valid
Gun haters are the extremist hate group demanding to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Valid
In these several articles consist the rights, or as they are frequently termed, the liberties of Englishmen. . . .And we have seen that these rights. . .consist, primarily, in the free enjoyment of personal security, of personal liberty, and of private property.
Output: Valid
Once we disarm law abiding citizens, the only armed civilians around will be criminals who would never willingly give up their weapons.
Output: Valid
Also, regarding U.S. v. Emerson, the Fifth Circuit concluded: "we reject the collective rights and sophisticated collective rights models for interpreting the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
Trigger locks do not protect guns from being stolen, and an improperly-installed trigger lock can cause a gun to fire accidentally, especially if the gun is dropped.
Output: Valid
However just because the Second Amendment isn't absolute in scope, that doesn't mean that it's perfectly legal to cook up and try and enforce these gun control measures that everybody seems to be so in favor of.
Output: Valid
Law abiding citizens are not going to misuse their firearms and those with criminal records are already banned from owning guns.
Output: Valid
Comparing the 2nd amendment to other 'rights' doesn't really apply if I am seeking to remove the second amendment.
Output: Valid
Your advocating total violation of the constitution to prevent criminals from stealing guns from law abiding citizens.
Output: Valid
At the same time, burglars also report that guns are of considerable value to them.... Interviews with active burglars suggest that they typically prefer items that are easy to carry, easily concealed, and have high 'pound for pound' value.
Output: Valid
You people fail to realize if someone is intent on committing a crime they will most likely GET A GUN, stopping the selling of guns will just restrict civilians from protecting themselves.
Output: Valid
Survivors of gun violence, victims' families and arms campaigners are destroying guns across the world:
Output: Valid
Therefore, if you avoid gangs (those who tend to have guns - they are still criminals), there is little point in carrying a gun yourself.
Output: Valid
Supporting gun control to stop violent criminals, is like supporting a ban on cameras to stop child pornography.
Output: Valid
Feel free to present the evidence that shows that we're allowing criminals to freely buy guns and that we have no laws in place to stop this from occurring.
Output: Valid
While it may be true that more illegal acts than protective measures are associated with guns, the extension to the average law abiding gun owner's habits is invalid.
Output: Valid
Scalia could have claimed that the amendment was primarily about the right to keep and bear arms for militia purposes but was broad enough to also encompass a right to own guns for personal self defense.
Output: Valid
Rather, his more guns = more crime equation relies upon his argument over the ease which one can get a gun in NY���easy he says because of gun runners evading the city���s legal restrictions.
Output: Valid
I think the precedent set by Heller was that the Second Amendment protects an individual right but judges can still do the mental gymnastics to justify the gun control laws they like.
Output: Valid
Would-be gun owners must justify their need for a weapon and undergo competency training and background checks, which prohibit anyone with a history of substance abuse or violent crime from owning a gun.
Output: Valid
Where is the evidence to prove that a person with a concealed carry permit is going to actually commit violent acts against another?
Output: Valid
Simply because your own ignorance leaves you eternally blind to the real world is no reason to assume that others know nothing.
Output: Valid
Every dollar spent on education now will prevent countless dollars worth of crime damage in the future.
Output: Valid
We are up against that: A woman who comes on TV makes up some bullishit and then goes home leaving her security in the hands of the government.
Output: Valid
They are going to lose and be shipped back to India or Canada where they are more comfortable working with and for the government :)
Output: Invalid
Funny they weren't interested when 'they' were buying guns to give cartels by the truckload and were notified by the dealers.
Output: Valid
The number of concealed carry permits issued per year are in the hundreds of thousands for a single state.
Output: Valid
Attacking a person who happens to have no weapon while you have a knife would make you a clear candidate for the penitentiary.
Output: Valid
This is why they are not collective rights like the gun haters
Output: Valid
In your countries the gun laws were apparently made without public interest in mind.
Output: Valid
This also provides you the opportunity to show the inexperienced person how to tell whether a firearm is loaded and to teach him the basic rules of firearms safety.
Output: Valid
The Bill of Rights is a list of declaratory and restrictive clauses.
Output: Valid
If somebody fails the background check they go buy a gun elsewhere.
Output: Valid
There is virtually no chance that the chinese will intervene on our behalf as far as the korean situation goes.
Output: Invalid
I have it posted on many threads the crime report, Gun Crime skyrocketed up 47%!!!
Output: Valid
First off, there's no debate; right-wingers don't speed anymore than left wingers, and there's no factor (besides drugs and alcohol) that would make a person speed more.
Output: Invalid
As questions continue to surround the shooting, Heyward's family and civil rights leaders take issue with the police response.
Output: Valid
The difficulty of this reasoning comes into play when real world facts are introduced to the discussion.
Output: Invalid
So, when are you going to open your household so the government can inspect your belongings and dictate who you perform private transactions with, and what private property you choose to buy and sell?
Output: Valid
In Chile when the armed forces gave a coup in half a day they controlled the whole country, any sporadic insurgence was put down easily.
Output: Valid
Just as the well being of your children is not the responsibility of gun owners, how we exercise our rights is not your responsibility either.
Output: Valid
To expect strict gun control laws to have any effect, in and of themselves, in a nation with 300,000,000 guns in private hands is ridiculous.
Output: Valid
Gun ownership is a recognized, constitutionally protected right, and it's not dependent on fulfilling some duty to the city, state or federal government.
Output: Valid
Even gun hating knife hating, sword hating, pizza cutter hating, citizen rights hating england still allow airsoft.
Output: Valid
The study documents a deliberate gun industry design and marketing strategy, begun in the 1980s, that has resulted in the easy availability and shockingly weak regulation of guns that are���
Output: Valid
Given this man's criminal record with guns, I would like to know why he was still able to own a gun.
Output: Valid
The killers in the Columbine massacre obtained three guns via a straw purchase by another student, acquired their automatic from a gun dealer and purchased a fourth from a seperate student.
Output: Valid
Are you sure that it is ENTIRELY illegal to own a firearm, or is it possible to obtain a permit for one?
Output: Valid
The courts up to the supreme court have held that criminals can't be made to register guns.
Output: Valid
(9-0) Heller, The right to keep and bear arms is a personal individual right absent any nexus to the militia.
Output: Valid
Thus the federal government had no power to correct these violations, rather the citizens had to rely on the police power of the states for their protection from private individuals.
Output: Valid
The numbers above tend to indicate that fewer gun-related homicides is a direct result of stricter gun control laws.
Output: Valid
That pretty much boiled down to laws against felons having weapons, laws against the mentally defective having weapons, and laws against carrying weapons in sensitive places.
Output: Valid
If guns really provided this kind of protection, we could easily imagine that one of the previous nine murder attempts would have been successful, had the victim not possessed a gun.
Output: Valid
If a gun owner knowingly sells to a prohibited felon who commits a murder with the gun, then the felon alone is responsible for the murder.
Output: Valid
School district employees should not be carrying weapons on campus, just as students should not be carrying weapons."
Output: Valid
The features listed would already prohibit the sale of firearms that various military and police organizations have certified as being suited for their uses after having passed rigorous safety and reliability tests.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment isn't about a right to serve in the militia as a government owned slave.
Output: Valid
But if such magazines would benefit law abiding citizens in an armed conflict then why couldn't they also benefit criminals?
Output: Valid
The whole reason why the Second Amendment exists is so that the people could defend themselves against the tyranny of their own government.
Output: Valid
But un fortunately the bad guy have guns and currently we have no way of changing that.
Output: Valid
The majority of them can only be used if the firearm is already unloaded and the action is open, meaning a person can't accidentally shoot themselves or another to begin with.
Output: Valid
malfunctions that are not due to ammunition that fails to
Output: Valid
I believe it would've been the same had Mr. Reynolds used an axe, pitchfork or even crossbow in an attempt to defend himself, because all of these constitute a deadly weapon capable of issuing deadly force.
Output: Valid
I am totally against any registration as the only reason for it is to know where they are when its time to go get them.
Output: Valid
When reporters want to use a positive label, they use words like ���citizen���s group.���
Output: Invalid
The number of background checks carried out for the purpose of buying a firearm have increased.
Output: Valid
But I do not believe that a gun ban will make us any safer.
Output: Valid
We didn't ban all guns, just most of them, because our farmers need them and our police need them.
Output: Valid
Is it the lasting bloodline of a nation of frontiersmen, born from armed struggle against an empire?
Output: Valid
And Budweiser is directly responsible for more cases of vehicular homicide, liver failure, spousal abuse and drunken brawls, than any of Browning's designs could ever be used for.
Output: Valid
It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never* have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects."
Output: Valid
Home security duties requiring firearm training will not be on their chore lists.
Output: Valid
By the time the tea party is through the rest of the country will just have to wait for the next election.
Output: Valid
Opponents of concealed carry started calling Florida the ���gunshine state.���
Output: Valid
Just BS, countries with the highest living standards has much more complex gun laws.
Output: Valid
Background check are a must but armed citizens help save lives
Output: Valid
But isn't the price of giving up your rights worth eventually becoming a socialist state where every aspect of your life is controlled by the government?
Output: Valid
Illegal firearms can be identified and linked to other firearms and to crimes and criminals.
Output: Valid
Fortunately, the vast majority of people who carry on flights are great people just doing their job.
Output: Valid
Right now we have the worst of both strategies, gun laws are restrictive enough that not many criminals are being stopped by citizens; they are permissive enough that low level criminals may still own a gun legally.
Output: Valid
Gun free zones are areas that criminals enter with guns because they know they are no armed law-abiding citizens there to stop them.
Output: Valid
VoR you keep saying that your for reasonable gun control but yet all your false idols keep chiming in here on a TOTAL gun ban, government confiscation, and allowing elitists to continue to carry.
Output: Valid
Gun hater pilot's lack of logic is to not allow law abding citizens the right to bear arms, and do nothing to protect the unarmed law abiding citizens.
Output: Valid
DC's highest gun deaths per capita coincidences with the fact that guns are legal there, doesn't mean anywhere guns are legal crime rates will be high.
Output: Valid
Even though gun clubs at school are not the problem this anti gun/gun control advocate defends no guns at school.
Output: Valid
All gun control laws do is stop law abiding citizens from having guns!
Output: Valid
There's no evidence to prove the believe that when guns are less available, less criminals will be armed than if guns were more readily available.
Output: Valid
While this revelation tends to debunk long-standing claims by gun control proponents that more guns in circulation leads to more crime, gun rights organizations contend that this bolsters their contention that armed citizens deter criminals.
Output: Valid
********* logic is for companies and governments to deny a person the right to bears arms to defend ones self then not be held responsible when these companies and governments fail to protect the unarmed citizens!
Output: Valid
I think we recognize that gun control laws can reduce the number of criminals owning guns although not disarm every criminal.
Output: Valid
If gun control will not affect criminal ownership of guns and people will always be able to get a firearm if they want, why should a government make the effort to ban firearms as a precursor to atrocities?
Output: Valid
Speaking of the 14th amendment, there is one scholar that says an individual right to own a gun came with the 14th amendment, not the second amendment.
Output: Valid
Is your point that citizens should be allowed to have guns to defend themselves from the government or that citizens should be allowed to have guns to protect themselves from other citizens?
Output: Valid
Gun prohibitionists argue that the Second Amendment confers a right to bear arms only on duly enrolled members of a state militia.
Output: Valid
Gun ban = No civilians can protect themselves using a firearm = Criminals can illegally purchase guns, like tons already do.
Output: Valid
Of course, when the founders wrote the Second Amendment they had in mind people owning much less powerful weapons than gun owners have now.
Output: Valid
In short, the panel could find no link between restrictions on gun ownership and lower rates of crime, firearms violence or even accidents with guns.
Output: Valid
The argument isn't that guns promote or cause crime, it is that when crimes happen having a gun involved causes more damage.
Output: Valid
Gun hater pilot logic is for companies and governments to deny a person the right to bears arms to defend ones self then not be held responsible when these companies and governments fail to protect the unarmed citizens!
Output: Valid
Well, not all colleges are government institutions and our government has traditionally banned guns from certain locations not in violation of the 2nd amendment.
Output: Valid
The Supreme Court has determined that the Second Amendment is directly linked to personal defense, not anything like hunting, and therefore a "sporting only" prerequisite for owning a firearm would never pass constitutional muster.
Output: Valid
The federal government has NO business dabbling in concealed carry regulation, unless they are going to declare it a protected activity under the second amendment.
Output: Valid
2009) (concluding that Heller ���identified limits deriving from various historical restrictions on possessing and carrying weapons,��� including the felon dispossession provision, that ���were left intact by the Second Amendment���).
Output: Valid
Just because if you hang upside down and squint sideways, you can read the wording of the Second Amendment as protecting no one from anything, this does not void other places the Right to keep and bear Arms were guaranteed.
Output: Valid
The gun right people demand that they be allowed to hand out pamphlets defending the right to have guns if the school allowed anti gun/gun control advocates to pass out pamphlets vilifying guns.
Output: Valid
There's absolutely no evidence in existence that when the Founding Fathers wrote and ratified the Second Amendment, that they were anticipating the need to quell negro rebellions.
Output: Valid
If the gun suit reform cannot be passed without amendments that extend the assault weapon ban and reguulate private sales, we need to urge our lawmakers NOT to pass it.
Output: Valid
What it seems like you are claiming is that if the owner would otherwise let you in if you didn't have a gun, you have a right to go in by the 2nd amendment.
Output: Valid
I believe in gun control (and wrote this piece to satirize pro-gunners) because I hate guns and want to see them all banned, which is why I own guns and also enjoy reading firearms-related literature.
Output: Valid
Law abiding citizens obey the law, there can surely be no reason to prohibit them form having guns.
Output: Valid
The militia and the citizens at large would only carry weapons that civilized nations would use in warfare, they would not rightfully carry weapons useful only to criminals.
Output: Valid
You can't push for mandatory training and license requirements, such restrictions have been found unconstitutional with regard to other rights, and thanks to Heller and McDonald the same standard applies to the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
Commercial robbery is absolutely minimal at best - and I have far less issues about employees of firms likely to be robbed to carry guns.
Output: Valid
It is asserted, therefore, that the D.C. gun control laws irrationally prevent only law abiding citizens from owning handguns.
Output: Valid
Felons are not allowed to buy guns.....terrorists would not be allowed to take guns on planes.
Output: Valid
Since 1980, forty-four states have passed some form of law that allows gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes for personal protection.
Output: Valid
A lkot of gun owners today simply are not bright enough to grasp that protection against your government was WITHOUT QUESTION the secondary goal of the second amendment and of civilian ownership of firearms.
Output: Valid
When the Home Office publishes its latest quarterly crime figures on Thursday, they will include a section on gun crime injuries and deaths, but the figures will again exclude a significant number of incidents.
Output: Valid
Plus, if all firearms are illegal, and if one were to illegally obtain a gun, why not own and use automatic weapons, just like the gangs in England are using?
Output: Valid
Get real sinjin, the average person has no idea what a RIGHT is much less what the gun control laws are.
Output: Valid
Again, I don't think anybody will argue that owning a gun prevents crime.
Output: Valid
Gun control in the U.S. does not equal crime control.
Output: Valid
It was in no way illegal for a student to keep their legally owned firearms on school property while attending class and then go hunting after they were finished for the day.
Output: Valid
it isn't guns that kill people, is the mentality these people carry around in their heads that kill other people.
Output: Valid
The 2nd Amendment was put in to stop your guys from infringing on our Right to Keep and Bear Arms!
Output: Valid
Are you saying that since all guns have been banned for civilian use in Countries like England, that murders by guns and gun crimes have gone to absolute zero there?
Output: Valid
Since there are gun deaths in countries that have banned guns, the gun bans did not work.
Output: Valid
I think law abiding citizens should be allowed to carry conceled weapons.
Output: Valid
THIS IS EXACTLY the kind of legal gun owner that should NOT HAVE a gun!!!
Output: Valid
BTW, It's weird how you always whine that the rights of criminals are violated, you're against Megan's Law, you think pedophilia should be legalized, and you want guns taken out of as many hands as possible.
Output: Valid
If you take away the civilian's only right to self defense, how are they suppose to defend themselves from the criminals who buy weapons and drugs from the black market illegally.
Output: Valid
In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).
Output: Valid
Round and round... Of course guns can fail... people can fail.... hammers can fail... But I am willing to die trying.
Output: Valid
It dealt with an individual right and further indentified the limits of that right to be certain that the RKBA provision would not be construed to protect the carrying of concealed weapons.
Output: Valid
You are asking of our government the abdication of their solemn oaths to uphold and protect The Constitution.
Output: Valid
Those who would remove our freedom to defend ourselves always seem to link the number of guns to the high rate of gun crime.
Output: Valid
. . .[A]ll these immunities, privileges, rights, thus guaranteed by the Constitution or recognized by it, are secured to the citizens solely as a citizen of the United States and as a party in their courts.
Output: Valid
Compare that to many other developed nations that don't have a murder rate higher than 3 per 100,000 where there are a lot less armed citizens around to save lives.
Output: Valid
No matter what the motives are the simple truth is that "gun control" will eventually lay the path that will lead to "gun ban" taking place.
Output: Valid
Being forced to kill another human being, criminal or not, is a nightmare to be suffered through for years.
Output: Valid
You're glad when you read about somebody being killed, it makes you happy because you can dance in their spilled blood and exploit a family's tragedy to further your own goals, come hell or high water!
Output: Valid
This 20-round pistol fires a 5.7mm bullet that will defeat most body armor in military service around the world today.
Output: Valid
The only rights at risk in this entire thing are first amendment rights.
Output: Valid
Would you really want a public with an armed force of unknown size, strength, mobilty, location, organizational structure and intention anywhere in your country?
Output: Valid
...Virtually never are murderers the ordinary, law-abiding people against whom gun bans are aimed.
Output: Valid
I believe we must first remember that our founders had witnessed their own government���s use of a professional army to oppress them.
Output: Valid
The purpose of law and justice system is to punish and try to fix damages only AFTER a crime.
Output: Invalid
Therefore, this defendant still has a claim to the right, and the question now becomes which test to use to determine whether the law violates his RKBA.
Output: Valid
The NRA boasts that almost all states grant handgun permits to people with clean criminal and psychological records.
Output: Valid
Will people start to shoot each other over minor disputes?
Output: Valid
Once again, there is a curious drive to blame the legal firearm owner vs the criminal.
Output: Valid
Do you extend that derogatory standard to other items within the constitution that people have a desire to take part in?
Output: Valid
Which given that even *owning* a handgun is now illegal, is no real surprise.
Output: Valid
Under English common law, the Castle Doctrine was intended to be a narrow exception to the general duty to retreat.
Output: Invalid
In Jan 2003 the office in charge of public saftey was caught purposely fudging the statistics.
Output: Valid
One of them was the legal doctrine of in loco parentis ��� where school officials may act in place of a parent for school functions.
Output: Invalid
The antis like to think if they can get a federal court to undo this contract the States will be bound to follow unConstitutional law.
Output: Valid
I have no idea how you conclude that I have rigid thinking, violence of expression, paranoia and hysteria, and an inability to budge from preconceived notions.
Output: Valid
The incidence rate of an innocent being harmed when a Concealed Carry Permit holder draws hovers around 0.3%.
Output: Valid
So, no, I wouldn't say there was any "gun control" as you (Galileo) tried to pass off as early gun control laws.
Output: Valid
Facts are as useless at tits on a bull to anti gun nuts.
Output: Valid
If you can afford a gun you should be able to afford a proper storage device.
Output: Valid
So converted BB guns and farm house break ins are good things now?
Output: Valid
Going by the media, in the presidential race John McCain doesn't even exist unless the republicans have done something scandal-worthy.
Output: Invalid
The ATF has been known to lie on record to prosecute people.
Output: Valid
We, in very large numbers condemned this political tactic by the Democrats, to take an end run on our Constitution.
Output: Valid
There are situations where I'll be more in control of my destiny without a gun and you corner yourself and lost complete control of your destiny because of your gun.
Output: Valid
Whether they were more armed before or after it makes no difference after Hitler and the Nazis came to power they used the registration to disarm all those who were not Nazis.
Output: Valid
The founding fathers built the government so that it could not become so powerful as to strip us of our rights.
Output: Valid
As hard as the best and the brightest Anti-gun people in this Nation tried, meaning the CDC and The National Academy of Sciences, they could not find that necessary link.
Output: Valid
What you do not understand is that you can not take a word, a phrase, or even a sentence in the Constitutional Amendments, out of context, as you are doing.
Output: Valid
They specifically said that a complete and total ban on an entire class of firearms was alright.
Output: Valid
Feudal lords had the right to the virginity of every young girl in their fiefdom.
Output: Invalid
We also know that instable governments and tyrannical leaders are fully capable of waging war, and have done so in the past.
Output: Valid
You might be correct in your claim that willful compliance is the better decision to remain alive, (Although, I disagree) but what gives you the right to decide that this is the mandated way to respond for me?
Output: Valid
The States, or the people rightfully have all the power not delegated to the Federal government in their hands.
Output: Valid
Is self defense therefor legal or illegal with a firearm?
Output: Valid
Exactly how would multiple sales reports filed in rifle purchases qualify as "the right thing?"
Output: Valid
Switzerland where every male over 18 has a "military" firearm has the lowest crime rates anywhere in the world.
Output: Valid
And what Hitler did was change Germany gun control laws to explicitly disarm the jewish population based on religion.
Output: Valid
The homicide rate has climbed drasticaly with every gun control measure.
Output: Valid
Mahatma Mohandas K. GandhiAmong the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.
Output: Valid
Now I know that in your mind even hinting at the fact the government can do bad things makes someone hillbilly, but please, try to expand your mind a little.
Output: Valid
However there has been no calls for nationwide prohibitions on the sale and ownership of kevlar vests that apply to anyone who is not military or police.
Output: Valid
Please explain further how "to keep and bear arms" is a qualifier on "the people".
Output: Valid
Liberals believe in removing personal responsibility and replacing the concept of doing the work yourself with a nanny-like system where your needs are provided for as if you were a child and can't take care of yourself.
Output: Valid
And yet we do not see our suicide rate affected in any liner fashion relating to the increase of guns in circulation.
Output: Valid
Now do you understand how the right of self-defense will be an integral part of any court challenge���and that you cannot simply say we are not going to include it in any discussion?
Output: Valid
This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being
Output: Valid
Victoria yesterday became the first state to move on the agreement to outlaw all semi-automatic pistols with a barrel length of 120mm or more and 100mm or more for single shot pistols or revolvers."
Output: Valid
You assault the what you term "high capacity magazines" but fail to address that the round up program applies to all firearms accessories sold on the sites participating in the program.
Output: Valid
Perhaps you would like to explain how the police have to justify almost every night they are not loosing control of the streets as another shooting takes place.
Output: Valid
So if you mean, are many Democrats afraid of what We the People will think of Bill of Rights limiting legislation, I agree with this premise.
Output: Valid
With the number of legal exceptions to the child access prevention law in the state of California it is questionable how much legitimacy the law really has.
Output: Valid
He says that you can't judge the intent of others to make a life or death decision, but if you see somebody stabbing another person, then it's likely not a Sunday greeting that means nothing.
Output: Valid
I���m assuming you refer to council tax which is meant to be for community services like rubbish collection, fire protection etc..
Output: Invalid
If the article is correct, then the search involved in the theater case went far beyond a weapons ���pat down.���
Output: Valid
The father was the one that picked the gun thinking that the gun was small there for would be easy for the child to shoot (it was a Micro UZI).
Output: Valid
Since its a pawn shop and deals in firearms I am going out on a limb and say yes they have to follow the NCIS rules.
Output: Valid
Gun haters think banning guns will make criminals stop being criminals.
Output: Valid
Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens save lives, the statistics back this up from EVERY country EVER to introduce gun control.
Output: Valid
Gun-control regulations impose varying degrees of burden on Second Amendment rights, and individual assertions of the right will come in many forms.
Output: Valid
You're wrong that the second amendment is an induvidual right but, you will soon see that in the supreme court ruling that upholds the d.c gun ban.
Output: Valid
Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Valid
The catch is that if guns are too easy to get, even the criminals or those driven to crime by sudden passion or mental illness can easily obtain the weapons neccesary to cause mayhem.
Output: Valid
In sum, we hold that the District's ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.
Output: Valid
gun control doesent solve anything in fact it makes crime go up because the criminals will always get their guns and your only disarming the law abiding citizens thus making them easy victims from the criminals.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment, the right to be armed for all legal and lawful reasons, is finally recognized as not just a fundamental right, but an individual right held by the people, not any state or government.
Output: Valid
You are pulling the same XXXX Doc did in thinking that because I don't think more guns equals less crime that I automatically must think it means MORE crime and that gun control laws are effective and needed.
Output: Valid
Criminals kill people so gun haters like gun hater pilot want to pass gun control laws that only law abiding citizens obey!
Output: Valid
And if you have complaints about modern day gun laws such as those that ban the mentally ill and felons from possessing arms then remember that recent Supreme Court rulings already have shown their approval for such laws.
Output: Valid