niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Secondly, the reason that interpreting the Second Amendment isn't necessary is because Congress doesn't have the enumerated power to take guns away from the citizens.
Output: Valid
Similarly, a company will still face civil liability in addition to criminal penalties if it has violated state or federal law or sold a gun knowing that it would be used to commit a crime.
Output: Valid
I gaurantee you, if a criminal suspects you have a gun, he will be out in a heartbeat.
Output: Valid
Constitution, with a radical Bill of Rights, giving radical amounts of freedom to Americans, it was
Output: Valid
The laws being proposed are serving no purpose, because they're not being enforced.
Output: Valid
On the contrary, we stressedthat the right was also valued because the possession offirearms was thought to be essential for self-defense.
Output: Valid
Well judging by the way states handle matters related to children and what they consider abuse, then yes I'd disagree and say you don't get to decide.
Output: Valid
I have been trying to drum up support for bill 1604 which would make an exception for those silencers registered with the federal government, but it is hard to do.
Output: Valid
But I do know that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and if the BC was honest about its ineffective claims then it would have never have created a program that used the exact same message��_.
Output: Valid
New Jersey���s 2009 law limiting people to one handgun purchase per month is the most notable of the more restrictive laws.
Output: Valid
Certainly illegal transfers but I would also look at those that can't seem to secure their weapons against theft.
Output: Valid
Guns are an equalizer; a way for the weak to defend against the strong.
Output: Valid
And our government routinely disregards the constitution in formulating their foreign policy.
Output: Valid
Basically, when you have a gun free society, then who has them?
Output: Valid
That means the federally licensed dealers who maintain the current sales records, would have to keep a much greater number of sales records than ever before.
Output: Valid
It's not like you have to choose between gun control and good policing techniques.
Output: Valid
One can only speculate that the ban made crime skyrocket.
Output: Valid
Overall, rates of assault, robbery and burglary shot past those recorded in America and, maybe most ominously, 53 percent of British burglaries were said to occur while the residents were still in their homes.
Output: Valid
I thought my point was to prove that your laws would be so open that heavily armed Arabs could walk onto the plane and very easily take it over.
Output: Valid
In addition to being charged with illegal gambling, he was prosecuted for failing to register his illegal activities.
Output: Invalid
"The guys walking about with guns" is a poor identifier when everyone is armed.
Output: Valid
What would the U.N. recommend that victims do when they face criminals by themselves?
Output: Valid
I don't believe guns are good for anything, and I see no use in having them, but I believe it is everybody's right to produce or keep one, as it is just a weapon like anything else.
Output: Valid
Of the 8 appeals courts who have ruled on the second ammendment, it is my understading that half of them have recognised the second amendment as conveying an individual right, and the other half going the other way.
Output: Valid
Your entire argument is based on circular logic- equating whatever right to own guns that felons had been deprived of by due process with the Second Amendment right.
Output: Valid
Anybody who uses nonsensical lingo (ie cop killer bullets, rapid fire automatic weapons, saturday night specials, high-powered rifles, vest buster, gun show loophole etc.) to frighten people and distort the facts.
Output: Valid
To suit the people that believe guns should be completely illegal....I do feel that stricter laws need to be enforced to acquire such equipment.
Output: Valid
Gun hater pilot will then say why do you need to target shoot if you no longer need guns to hunt or defend yourself?
Output: Valid
I haven't seen anyone explain how another gun control law will fight crime, how it'll make anyone safer, how it'll put criminals away longer, etc.
Output: Valid
I change my mind about guns several times largely from reading posts in gun control debates forum.
Output: Valid
The slaughtering of innocent individuals in locations such as Africa and Uganda cannot be used to support their calls for tighter restrictions on access to civilian firearms.
Output: Valid
In my opinion there's absolutely nothing reasonable about banning the sale of firearms with simple cosmetic features, declaring that only the rich and wealthy can own guns, and that rationing the exercising of a constitutional right.
Output: Valid
It is intended to require registration of all firearms in the hopes that it will either deter or prevent felons and others who cannot have a gun in the first place from having one.
Output: Valid
So if we have Article 1 then it's only reasonable to assume that the militia clause of the Second Amendment has nothing to do with militia duties and responsibilities of any sort.
Output: Valid
People that read the 2nd amend as a militia thing also must think dangerous criminals will obey gun control laws.
Output: Valid
Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the Constitution by claiming it���s not an individual right or that it's too much of a safety hazard don't see the danger of the big picture.
Output: Valid
with regard to the fact that most gun crime is from illegl guns, in that case why not make all guns illegal.
Output: Valid
There is no further discussion to be had regarding the second amendment being applicable against private individuals who manage businesses accessible to the public.
Output: Valid
In false, misleading and, fortunately, ineffective ads, fliers, mailers and Web postings, the group said that Mr. Obama posed a 'clear and present danger' to Second Amendment rights and that his election would mean a gun ban.
Output: Valid
So by you saying tourists are afraid to come to America because they might get shot in one of our cities, implies that gun owners are participating in criminal activities as well.
Output: Valid
So if Cruikshank's denial that the right to bear arms was a right of national citizenship had no basis in the Slaughterhouse case which made a similar claim about fundamental rights then what did Cruikshank base it on?
Output: Valid
The Founders had in mind guns that were much less powerful when they wrote the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
If a politician intends to ban guns, then there is indication of an inflated ego, he/she has the "I'm more trustworthy than you."
Output: Valid
Still, there may be some statistics to show how many ���private��� and ���non dealer��� transfers are being processed by gun dealers���which could be argued would have otherwise gone unchecked had the law not been passed.
Output: Valid
I wonder how many criminals follow this strict regimen to legally posess an inanimate object on their private property?
Output: Valid
How about you bring an actual debate to the table for once instead of resorting to cheap, underhanded, inflammatory stupidity that contributes nothing and just brings down the average for gun haters everywhere.
Output: Valid
The Center for Disease Control, during the Clinton years, was found out to have been misleading the public about the health threat that private gun ownership posed.
Output: Valid
Sticking to the analogy, they have taken away everyones right to own a car because some people misuse them.
Output: Valid
Is there any justification for preventing people with no criminal record from acquiring post-'86 models, when the pre-'86 models aren't being used for committing crimes?
Output: Valid
To some courts (at least in my country), pulling a weapon means the other person is now justified in replying with the same amount of force.
Output: Valid
I agree most Americans men aren't gun crazy, for only one in five owns a gun or guns, and women just one in ten.
Output: Valid
To summarise/rephrase this new quote - guns are intrinsically offensive weapons, and anyone who knows this will make that mental link to aggression, even if it is a tenuous one.
Output: Valid
As for burglar alarms and the like, the purpose is intimidation - just as you've previously argued that guns are intimidating.
Output: Valid
Had James Holmes not been able to acquire this magazine his rifle would not have been disabled and he would have been free to change out empty magazines as often as he pleased.
Output: Valid
And if it did happen, the shooter would be killed in short order by an armed person or persons on the scene before it could turn into a massacre.
Output: Valid
Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshank���s actions had an individual RKBA.
Output: Valid
The point of the punishment line was to point out the attempt of the legislature to make it a crime to exercise your constitutional rights more frequently than they say you're allowed to.
Output: Valid
But when it comes to their use against the military of a foreign nation these deadly weapons are somehow considered insufficient and regarded in the same light as BB guns.
Output: Valid
In some cases, Hutu civilians were forced to murder their Tutsi neighbours by military personnel.
Output: Invalid
If we were then Obama wouldn't have changed his Second Amendment standpoint after the Heller decision to say that he actually supported the individual rights interpretation.
Output: Valid
They looked at gun ownership, drug use and a history of physical fights and found that each of these factors is associated with a higher homicide rate in the home.
Output: Valid
If citizens didn't have guns, that would make everyone feel that much safer.
Output: Valid
I think it is more important to convince the American public that it is dangerous to play the "living constitution" game.
Output: Valid
The book received rave peer reviews from supporters of gun control, like Gary Wills, who said the following:
Output: Invalid
Although a federal ballistic fingerprint law may be more effective than a patchwork of state systems, the costs of creating, maintaining, and using a federal system are likely to be substantial.
Output: Valid
Its an abolute right that is being infringed by power hungry tyrants and I am involved in the fight to restore those rights.
Output: Valid
And no mention has been made that part of the weapons traced aren't government issue, sold to Mexico by the American government for official military purposes.
Output: Valid
Regular people don't need box cutters, they can just use pointy sticks to cut tape on boxes.
Output: Valid
The truth is, smart Canadians can look across the ocean to see where gun control leads.
Output: Valid
In the Netherlands, less than five percent of homes contain legally owned firearms.
Output: Valid
The Fourth Amendment explicitly affirms the ���right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.���
Output: Valid
For too long, employers, churches, schools and others have said many different ways that they are sad to see things have to come to this, but this is a trap which serves not the people, but the killers.
Output: Valid
When individuals do it, they are called criminals, when governments do it they are called tyrannical.
Output: Valid
Confession from the criminal or videotaping the transaction, or someone providing testimony that you, in fact, knew that he was a criminal, prohibited from owning a firearm, and you intended to break the law.
Output: Valid
Analogous to the rich liberals like the Kennedys fighting for school integration while driving their kids to all-white private schools in limosines, hence the term "limosine liberal".
Output: Valid
Sue the Gun Makers for making a legal Produce, sue the Gun Shops who must get the FBI's permission in order to sell a gun to an American Citizen.
Output: Valid
my solution is your solution, I learnt it here in this and other threads that you fight fire with fire and if God hadn't wanted us to pack guns he wouldn't have let us invent guns right?
Output: Valid
Properly done, the task requires the consideration of an enormous mass of material--in the case of the Constitution and its Amendments, for example, to mention only one element, the records of the ratifying debates in all the states.
Output: Valid
It seems to me that gun activists were generally unconcerned about US guns being trafficked to Mexico in the past.
Output: Valid
You want unarmed passengers to fight an armed terrorist to retake control of hijacked airplanes.
Output: Valid
Opinion polls do not matter unless anti-gunners vote for anti-gun represenatives at polling places.
Output: Valid
They are shooting kids with toy guns except they are using the real thing.
Output: Valid
1) Does having laws regulating the the ability to carry concealed weapons violate the 2nd amendment of the constitution?
Output: Valid
WE AGREE THAT CRIMINALS SHOULDN'T BE ARMED, and the laws already exist on the books to punish them when convicted criminals are caught with guns.
Output: Valid
I understand that banning guns will not stop criminals from accessing them, but it will surely drop the crime rate and make it much harder to get a gun.
Output: Valid
You're saying that guns should be allowed into school in order to allow some students (or teachers) to defend themselves if they were attacked.
Output: Valid
At best Heller was simply saying that the individual rights nature of the Second Amendment doesn't automatically rule all gun control null and void.
Output: Valid
So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?
Output: Valid
Even back in the 60's gun owners were saying that if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns, and gun safety being stressed, and maybe even mandatory for children will produce benefits.
Output: Valid
It contends that, as recognized in Heller, the Second Amendment does not prevent the government from prohibiting firearms in sensitive places, which includes GMU's university buildings and widely attended university events.
Output: Valid
where gun control laws prohibit good law abiding citizens from carrying a gun to protect themselves and others.
Output: Valid
Government does not possess the authority to enact a total ban on firearm owners actually transporting their firearms, it violates the "bear" of the "keep and bear" provision of the second amendment.
Output: Valid
Gun haters must attack people defending the right to bear arms by calling them fanatics.
Output: Valid
As researchers such as Gary Kleck (Targeting Guns) and David Kopel (The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy) have found, suicides will generally find some other way to kill themselves if a gun is not available.
Output: Valid
Assuming for a moment that Bogus was correct���that the 2nd Amendment was intended to be only a states���/collective right to keep the sword in the hands of the southern states and allow them to hold the black man in bondage.
Output: Valid
This completely absurd argument against gun control makes about as much sense as saying that we shouldn't have airport security because airport security did not stop 9/11.
Output: Valid
In the dicta from a maritime law case the Supreme Court commented that state laws restricting concealed weapons do not infringe upon the right to bear arms protected by the Federal Second Amendment."
Output: Valid
They explain why assault weapons are favored by terrorists, mass killers, and violent criminals, and they distinguish such weapons from true hunting and target guns.
Output: Valid
Notice not one of the common sense gun control laws gun hater pilot is demanding is to punish dangerous criminals by keeping them in prison to keep guns away from them!
Output: Valid
FACT: Because it is already illegal for convicted felons to own guns, the Fifth Amendment protects felons from being forced to incriminate themselves by registering their guns.
Output: Valid
My personal opinion is that as long as criminals have access to guns through illegal means, it is inappropriate to prevent peaceful citizens from keeping arms of their own.
Output: Valid
Gun laws and bans are put in place that only affect good law abiding free citizens.
Output: Valid
Now he is getting off topic on an argument he cannot sustain by trying to discredit the militia clause of the Second Amendment and argue for less rights and more gun control.
Output: Valid
Your attempt to use rates of BJS to prove gun deaths, which have actually gone down despite huge increases of guns, fell flat as it has remained flat or decreased while other weapons were used in 2/3rds of the crimes.
Output: Valid
In Silveira v. Lockyer the 9th Circuit Court ruled that California's Assault Weapons Control Act is not unconstitutional and that the second amendment does not protect an individual right.
Output: Valid
Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns.
Output: Valid
Do you think that it is a huge coincidence that nations in which fewer law abiding citizens own guns such as Australia and the UK also have much lower rates of gun crime?
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment confers the right to bear arms, and earlier this year a U.S. Supreme Court ruling curtailed government's ability to regulate guns.
Output: Valid
Your argument is that the Second Amendment was designed for purposes relating to the militia exclusively, and individuals being armed for matters not related to the government was never something the Founding Fathers felt necessary to protect.
Output: Valid
If the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, or any of the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution are to be abridged, they must ne done so by legal means, i.e. constitutional amendment.
Output: Valid
If the Second Amendment were purely about the militia, and absolutely nothing else, then there would be no way retired members would be allowed to remain armed for their own private purposes.
Output: Valid
Gun control makes criminals lives much easier, because they can keep their guns, while they don't have to deal with armed citizens.
Output: Valid
IF you want them armed, why not let law abiding citizens who have passed a background check, a firearms safety check, and a marksmanship test carry their guns?
Output: Valid
The second amendment says MILITIAS have the right to carry guns, not private citizens, and that is why the militias are there to protects us and are composed of....private citizens.
Output: Valid
This is needed to prevent gun owners from covering up sales to prohibited purchasers by later claiming ��� when those guns are traced to crime ��� that their guns were stolen.
Output: Valid
Now when you rightfully talk about how the 2nd amendment grants me the right to own a gun people won't take you seriously because you think the 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment isn't a gun control law, it's an individual right, independent from militia service.
Output: Valid
It took the 14th amendment for them to get the right to keep and bear arms and still today the gun grabber agenda is based on denial of rights, all rights and not just Second Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
Guns are dangerous even though when they are banned people will still make them people think that they will still use them less people will use them less deaths will be by guns.
Output: Valid
I know people who want to limit ownership of guns to musket-type weapons as were used when the 2nd amendment was written and people that are for an insane amount of registration and background checks, etc.
Output: Valid
Those weapons, when used in armed conflicts, account for 300,000 deaths annually, says the U.N. Another 200,000 guns are involved in murders, suicides and accidental deaths.
Output: Valid
(i.e. restrictions on concealed carry, laws against brandishing) but we can not ban the carrying of arms altogether since that would violate the second amendment.
Output: Valid
I've heard you conclude some pretty far off stuff (e.g. that we should tax guns to fund the Brady campaign, that four-year-olds can carry firearms around, that gun owners have small tools, etc.).
Output: Valid
And several states have recently passed laws allowing gun owners to carry firearms in more places ��� bars, restaurants, cars and parks.
Output: Valid
I think the government has taken responsibility for the law abiding citizens by ensuring that nobody can carry a gun or other dangerous weapon on board a plane.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States America states that, ���A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.���
Output: Valid
Sure it's easy to draw the simple conclusion that "no guns = no killing" but in reality nothing is that cut and dry and simple, there's too much to take into account.
Output: Valid
Gun haters are like the dangerous criminals the gun haters want to keep guns away from.
Output: Valid
When you look at this case, SCOTUS is telling us that it believes individual citizens have a right to keep and bear military grade firearms, and that such an armed populace historically formed the backbone for an effective militia.
Output: Valid
Some advocate banning Assault Weapons, and you yourself have put forth several arguments that the 2nd amendment is not an Individual Right, and it applies only to a states right to form a militia.
Output: Valid
Because the term "gun nut" has come to mean a disparaging remark about anybody that supports the individual rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, and favors gun ownership over gun bans.
Output: Valid
And what's more, owning a gun is as fundamental a right as being able to own a Bible.
Output: Valid
And it is legal to ban marijuana and cigarets but guns are protected by the constitution.
Output: Valid
Our paper analyzes both state and county data spanning nearly twenty years, and we find no support that safe storage laws reduce either juvenile accidental gun deaths or suicides.
Output: Valid
Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms believe criminals will obey a law stating criminals cannot have guns?
Output: Valid
Logically, those socialists that wish to destroy property rights, and the legal system that upholds such values, are often the same people who suggest that you relinquish your right to bear arms.
Output: Valid
Thus, people do not turn to knives and other potententially lethal weapons less often when more guns are available, but more guns usually means more victims of homicide and suicide."
Output: Valid
This is the same logic the gun control supporters apply to people exercising their Second Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
The laws the gun haters want will keep the right to bear arms from the law abiding citizens!
Output: Valid
The Second amendment is designed to give us the tools for rebellion, and to shoot those politicians as we may see fit, but does not provide any kind of right to do so.
Output: Valid
I pointed out that the US has higher levels of gun crime than most developed nations while you tried to focus on a few tragedies in response to someone questioning the claim that criminals will always get guns.
Output: Valid
Germans would not invade countries with armed citizens, mandated by law to have access to weapons, real weapons not just single shot.
Output: Valid
Criminals don't care about gun bans, so a gun ban only takes guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens.
Output: Valid
Countries that ban guns or implement stricter laws concerning firearms have lower crime rates.
Output: Valid
We are law professors and historians who have a deep interest in the Second Amendment and its implications for the regulation of guns and of gun ownership.
Output: Valid
In rejecting Cornell's opinion that the Second Amendment offered no protection against gun control laws, the Supreme Court disemboweled him and everything he supported, rendering impotent anyone that would cite his works.
Output: Valid
When criminals are forced to use toy guns, your gun control policies are working.
Output: Valid
IF you previously had laws that made openly carrying weapons illegal, and you then pass a concealed carry law, if somebody is carrying a gun and it is not concealed, they are breaking the law.
Output: Valid
Firearms deaths fall as millions obtain permits to carry concealed guns
Output: Valid
Among other things, legislatures have allowed firearms to be carried in cars, made it illegal to ask job candidates whether they own a gun, and expanded agreements that make permits to carry handguns in one state valid in another.
Output: Valid
Second, regulating private party sales will not render gun shows unimpor-tant as sources of trafficked crime guns; the best evidence is that most of those guns are sold by licensed retailers.
Output: Valid
For example, many guns fire when dropped, and many semiautomatic handguns lack adequate chamber loaded indicators, so untrained users often do not know when a gun is loaded.
Output: Valid
One private individual asking another if they have guns in the home and then offering them a pamphlet on firearms safety if they say yes has nothing at all to do with gun control or the second amendment.
Output: Valid
If we really wanted to follow the Second Amendment people would need to be required to keep and train with all sorts of military weapons such as machine guns, explosives, greanades, shoulder mounted SAMs etc.
Output: Valid
I believe that some of my gun control friends know in their hearts they are unable to debunk the overwhelming historical evidence which proves the Second Amendment was intended to recognize an individual right.
Output: Valid
California is attempting something similar, arguing that their restrictive laws on issuing concealed carry permits are necessary to protect the public safety against criminals illegally carrying firearms, without explaining the relationship between the two.
Output: Valid
Gun free zones are zones where criminals will have guns because criminals will not obey the laws about gun free zones.
Output: Valid
Is it to somehow imply the the right to own a gun, as the other rights GUARANTEED :) by the constitution are somehow natural rights?
Output: Valid
I think we have enough people against kids owning guns to pass an amendment to the second amendment or else the 13th saying that kids don't have quite as many rights.
Output: Valid
Anybody else in American history able to lend credibility to your belief that the Second Amendment was all about gun control and how gun ownership was never intended to be an individual right?
Output: Valid
Who can believe that the right to keep and bear arms could survive "community storage," with gun owners needing to ask government bureaucrats for permission to obtain access to their own guns?
Output: Valid
First you say no law will ever stop criminals from getting guns but now youre saying that criminals are never gun owners.
Output: Valid
The bird watchers don't pay doodly squat to enjoy what the hunters and gun purchasers provide for wildlife habitat.
Output: Valid
If you want how it relates to guns, there is clear evidence (gun crime) that many people use guns irresponsibly... I think a different thread put the figures at about 0.2% of guns used irresponsibly (criminally) per year.
Output: Valid
The lunatic fringe here has called me anti gun as well, and I can just about promise I have more guns than any 5 of them put together.
Output: Valid
Calibre Press, a well-known publisher/distributor of -officer-survival material, appropriately stated that this officer���s death ���serves as a grim reminder that red laser dots should, for good reason, cause police officers serious concern.���
Output: Valid
Walk into a school and tell the principle it is your constitutional right to have a gun there.
Output: Valid
Loose control of his firearm to a person who does not have the right to be in posession of the firearm.
Output: Valid
Second of all, I wholeheartedly believe in the thinking that guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Output: Valid
Or the ability of public housing authorities in San Francisco seeking to ban the ownership of firearms by their tenants.
Output: Valid
The Honorable Gentleman who presides, told us, that to prevent abuses in our Government, we will assemble in Convention, recall our delegated powers, and punish our servants for abusing the trust reposed in them.
Output: Valid
Despite municipal respondents��� doomsday proclamations, incorporation does not imperil every law regulating firearms."
Output: Valid
Conspiracy to commit a crime or disturb the peace is a violation of rights, not an exercise of rights.
Output: Valid
Another point that isn't taken in consideration in the stats that I've seen is that guns are used in self-defense but it still goes down as "gun violence."
Output: Valid
The MAIG poll confirmed the findings of earlier polls commissioned by CeaseFirePA, which found 96 percent of Pennsylvanians to be in support of lost or stolen - including 92 percent of gun owners."
Output: Valid
We have not seen the realization of the dire predictions of a massive wave of challenges to our state���s gun laws.
Output: Valid
Supposedly under Heller such a ban on future developments would be legal, because it only relates to new weaponry that is not yet available for general use by the public.
Output: Valid
He claims that he's not, but his support of proposals that have the potential to make criminals out of innocent crime victims would suggest otherwise.
Output: Valid
So, for example, a person who was involuntarily institutionalized for several weeks in 1973, and who has been mentally healthy since then, could petition for a restoration of Second Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
Attacking the root causes and only the root causes does not trample over anyones civil rights.
Output: Valid
An application is deemed complete when all information required to be furnished by the applicant is delivered to and received by the clerk of court before or concomitant with the conduct of a state or national criminal history records check.
Output: Valid
Even if they were it's an impossible task as there's approximately less than a million police officers for the entire country, meaning about ONE officer for every 300+ citizens.
Output: Valid
In addition to ORGANIZING the militia, and while congress has the power to ARM the militia, they have no responsibility to do so, and they have NEVER provided personal weapons.
Output: Valid
Machine gns are currently legal (despite an unconstitutional tax that is required to purchase one) and there has NEVER been a single case of a private citizen using a legally owned machine gun to commit a crime.
Output: Valid
Even the police forces are saying that the law is pointless as it would only serve to increase the smuggling of handguns from the US, and would likely not have any impact on the rate of handgun use in crimes.
Output: Valid
You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Valid
Think you are missing the point, there is no way that you can really argue a gun ban within the constitution as is (whether the thing is really valid is another discusion entirely).
Output: Valid
England and the Netherlands have not avoided these sinister voices advocating gun violence by restricting guns.
Output: Valid
You have been shown the facts that most criminals get their guns from family members or they steal them, even from cops.
Output: Valid
Yet this gun grabber group of drooling nit wits wants more laws that attack the law abiding.
Output: Valid
Whether or not he is a felon, if you give someone a gun knowing they intend to commit a particular crime with it then you are responsible as an accessory before the fact.
Output: Valid
The Second Amendment is about legal and lawful activities, not fulfilling some duty to the government, or serving in the military.
Output: Valid
Who's going to file a lawsuit and allege that a person doesn't have a right to own a gun for any reason?
Output: Valid
Also during the seventies and eighties, the government introduced new forms of noncustodial sentencing, including community service and early-release schemes even for career criminals.
Output: Valid
Meaningless circular hypotheticals aside, whatever the ifs, ands, buts, or maybe's, an individual with a gun undeniably has a potential to be deadlier than an individual without a weapon.
Output: Valid
For every one crime gun that California exports, we get more than two crime guns imported back into our state."
Output: Valid
But if you catch him with a gun while he is selling, then the punishment for just on offense of having the gun is an automatic 5 years which cannot be suspended.
Output: Valid
Neighborhood watch is set up with the police so it's an official organization of concerned citizens, not some random group of vigilantes looking to hang somebody for being in the wrong neighborhood with the wrong color of skin.
Output: Valid
Or is it only that the right to drive cars isn't protected by the constitution?
Output: Invalid
The issue here is your wish to carry a gun as according to a law, which you don't really respect anyway, because you're quite happy to circumvent it all the time.
Output: Valid
This doesn't have to be done with a gun, meaning that firearms and ammunition win hands down in terms of longevity.
Output: Valid
so the NRA is so stupid to believe that the second amendment means terrorists can tote around assault rifles
Output: Valid
The purpose was to demonize legitimate gun owners and gun shows, gun dealers and the entire pro rights community.
Output: Valid
SCOTUS still says we can ban ���machine guns��Ȋ��so all we have to do call these protected firearms ���machine guns��� and trust SCOTUS can���t see through our ruse.
Output: Valid
Civilians are held to much higer standards as far as liability goes than police officers are
Output: Valid
Therefore, while most people are hindranced by the laws, criminals will still obtain weapons illegally.
Output: Valid
H.R. 822 appears to move concealed carry permits into the same territory as driver's licenses, which a state is required to recognize as valid regardless of where it was issued.
Output: Valid
We border two countries one of which is quite corrupt, what makes you think that criminals can't get guns.
Output: Valid
Rawles Commentaries - Politically, a maxim like the preamble to the Second Amendment could warn the people of any state to be wary of any legislature, even a state legislature, that sought to disarm them.
Output: Valid
They're not dangerous or unique, and if they did pose a significant threat then congress would've covered them in the 1934 National Firearms Act.
Output: Valid
The same LE that has been caught selling drugs and guns in the evidence locker back to the bad guys?
Output: Valid
In short, Norway has more guns, yet less people killing each other.
Output: Valid
It ain't news if it isn't a gun being used, then mass murder is fine with you lot huh?
Output: Valid
I have to ask: are you people so idiotically diluted that you honestly believe the best way to fight crime is to target law-abiding citizens and require them to abide by unproven and unenforceable methods?
Output: Valid
The KKK and the Nazis will be happy to hear that the anti gun/gun control advocates are giving them permission to once again press for demands to limit other people rights.
Output: Valid
If you are talking firearms, then wouldnt it be called an assault gun, rather than an assault weapon.
Output: Valid
Economic factors would suggest otherwise with regards to the right to choose not to do business with an individual if they do not wish to.
Output: Valid
In fact, during a decade of fighting, losses by the US Armed forces totalled 47,378 more than the average of 45,000 people killed each year in car accidents during the mid-sixties.
Output: Valid
If somebody gives me that damned "That's different, guns are meant for killing but cars are made for traveling" argument, I'm gonna send them to the demolition durby.
Output: Valid
We had something like that in DC for over 30 years, and the police still couldn't get guns away from the criminals.
Output: Valid
Guns are a problem for dictators and tyrants alike and their goal is complete domination.
Output: Valid
The bill also calls for each gun owner to be fingerprinted, have a back ground check, and to submit pass port-style photos for registration cards.
Output: Valid
The exercise of a RIGHT guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the Sheriff - People vs. Zerillo
Output: Valid
You read of a riot act in a country [ England ] which is called one of the freest in the world, where a few neighbors cannot assemble without the risk of being shot by hired soldiery, the engines of despotism.
Output: Valid
Someone caught red-handed robbing or murdering someone with a firearm could get out on bail and immediately go replace the weapon taken from them by police.
Output: Valid
The Governor's denial of a petition for the restoration of voting rights shall be a final decision and the petitioner shall have no right of appeal.
Output: Invalid
Also, a ballistic fingerprint of every rifled firearm taken, and sealed with the records, and only accessed within the confines of a criminal investigation with a court order.
Output: Valid
The BCS is the most accurate measure of crime in England because it takes into account crimes not reported to police.
Output: Invalid
The vast majority of gun crimes do not end in a death.
Output: Valid
I think that they would almost have to set basic minimum standards to adhere to, but I agree that the government should not run the classes.
Output: Valid
You���re [apparently] 2 times more likely to robbed and 2.5 times as likely to be assaulted in the UK compared to the US.
Output: Valid
That means out of all the officers killed in a given year only two of their deaths can be somehow linked to a concealed carry permit.
Output: Valid
There is no right to a dollar, rights never trump each other.
Output: Invalid
That's just how the world works, sometimes things are gonna go wrong, somebody innocent is going to die, and there are going to be consequences afterward.
Output: Invalid
Everyone now thinks the constitution is a bunch of negative liberties including our current president.
Output: Invalid
A protracted campaign is out of the question, the US government would be able to lockdown and fight a war of attrition as they are doing in Iraq.
Output: Valid
Since they've never done this it's only safe to assume that they hate absolutely any kind of gun and want them all banned outright without exception.
Output: Valid
Banning individual ownership of guns defeats the whole purpose and the principles upon which this Country was founded.
Output: Valid
Exercising a constitutional right and going to and from on public property can no longer sustain such seizures.
Output: Valid
Removal of rights was never an issue for citizens of this Republic.
Output: Invalid
Do you want to compare how many people are killed or seriously hurt by criminals in the US as opposed to the UK.
Output: Valid
Did you ever stop and wonder why those $125 Hi-Point pistols are such big sellers, or why anybody would actually choose to own a $150 Jiminez pistol?
Output: Valid
Our legal system follows an Orwellian concept that all rights are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Output: Valid
I would bet there are some that have had the serial numbers removed or mutilated and there is no way to check.
Output: Valid
However, I can understand that people can use guns for recreation, hunting and sport.
Output: Valid
We get the spin from the left, and the spin from the right, but seldom do we ge the group of facts in the middle.
Output: Invalid
So MM took liberties in editing to make the gun lobby appear to be insensitive to murder and mayhem undertaken with their product.
Output: Valid
Federal law specifies that this form has to be filled out anytime one person buys more than two handguns in a one week calender period.
Output: Valid
The doctors are protected against malpractice and kill 10 times the TOTAL number of any and all deaths by guns.
Output: Valid
It served to show that even under the law standard of California successful prosecution would be difficult or impossible to achieve.
Output: Valid
So, too, the core rights retained and reserved to 'the people' in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were rights of the people collectively to govern themselves democratically.
Output: Valid
And because as he so convincingly puts it : MORE GUNS= LESS CRIME
Output: Valid
Repetition of the lie on this board reflects on the low quality of posters and their illegal abdication of their oaths and responsibilities.
Output: Valid
Sad but true, the old saying of "give them an inch and they will take a mile" comes to mind.
Output: Valid
Whilst the true term as I mentioned before: Well regulated referred to the property of something being in proper working order.
Output: Valid
They all know the law but turn their heads and hearts to their own desires and choose to ignore the laws and morals that founded this Republic and bears true faith and alligience to it.
Output: Valid
The supreme court has ruled on many occasions that when interpeting the constitution, the greatest weight mush be given to the original intent of those who wrote it.
Output: Valid
Let's see what they get, when REAL trouble happens, and they have to stop everything, and try to load the gun!
Output: Valid
Someone selling regularly to criminals won't be filing insurance claims.
Output: Valid
This is the best we can know about how a criminal feels about running into an armed citizen.
Output: Valid
Most parents today don't buy their kids toy guns and certainly not realistic replicas.
Output: Valid
So I take it you'd return 2A rights to armed robbers, for instance, upon completion of their parole.
Output: Valid
People if no one had a gun in an area and one single shot was heard, the whole area would be on alert for that one shot and the gun would get confiscated.
Output: Valid
I do not support more funding for law enforcement + gun restrictions on the same bill before Congress.
Output: Valid
And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."
Output: Valid
One of the things said by the majority was that the weapons involved must have been machineguns in interstate commerce because one originated from out of the country ad the other was a U.S. military weapon.
Output: Valid
A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
Output: Valid
There is no way an honest historian can assume from this that a lawyer believes the Pennsylvania RKBA statute does not recognize a right to armed self-defense.
Output: Valid
Just one month after the September 11 terrorist attacks, an unnamed Washington state woman was stopped for having a loaded two-shot derringer in her carry-on baggage at Sea-Tac Airport.
Output: Valid
In fact, in kanada, suicides increased with stricter gun laws...another failed experiment.
Output: Valid
In the US a few pounds of metal filled with explosives in one's possession can easily make the difference between successful defense against an attempted crime and victim status.
Output: Valid
If you want any protection for your rights, you have to be able to present an argument outlining how they are being violated.
Output: Valid
Now the gun haters that do not believe the 2.5 million lives a year saved by guns.
Output: Valid
Rather than admit wrongness, (very hard to do once a person has so vehemently commited themselves to an agenda) there is no other choice than to follow the trail of that path to the end.
Output: Valid
So don't believe anyone when they say there is a gun show loop hole.
Output: Valid
There's no problem in buying a gun, the problem comes in what you buy the gun for.
Output: Valid
These questions cannot be answered by a gun trace, no matter how accurate.
Output: Valid
Furthermore there is nothing that would conclusively suggest denying this individual a concealed carry permit would have prevented the shooting from occurring.
Output: Valid
Federal law doesn't give them authority to require sale reports of multiple shotgun and rifle sales, only handguns.
Output: Valid
What you are doing is a not so subtle form of propaganda by endlessly repeating the fallacy of an inantimate object, a gun, being illegal in and by itself.
Output: Valid
people against the mal-administration of the government; if we could suppose that in all cases the rights of the people would be attended to, the occasion for guards of this kind would be removed.
Output: Valid
Who's to say that someone doesn't board a plane, with no intent to criminal act, drinks way too much, then lets a few rounds off as he trips out
Output: Valid
Those are all the government, if it has gotten as far as the people, and the government (the president, the congress, the supreme court) has decided on gun control, who's going to arrest them for it?
Output: Valid
What seems odd is an Australian with no Constitution and subject of the U>K has so much time on his hands when working as an accountant for all these colleges talking about something he knows doodly about.
Output: Valid
Where ALL guns are registered and they even sent police into each gun owner's home to make sure that they were secured properly.
Output: Valid
A person has to pick up the gun and use it...just as they would a knife, a bat, a lead pipe, a #2 wooden pencil, a hatpin, a brick...you get the picture.
Output: Valid
Whether or not government should be dipping its fingers into matters concerning insurance records is a separate matter from government maintaining independent databases of private information.
Output: Valid
If the CDC states that the ban was ineffective, then it should be a given that bans do NOT work.
Output: Valid
I need to know why it is so important that the types of guns have changed.
Output: Valid
Your post was addressed, and it was pointed out that a place does not become a "sensitive location" simply because large gathering of people may congregate at that location, nor because children may gather to play there.
Output: Valid
Something that the 2nd amendment told the Federal Government that was not to be infringed.
Output: Valid
The Miller Court said that the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment should be read with the militia end in view.
Output: Valid
The goal has not been to win these legally weak cases but rather, with so many simultaneous suits, to bankrupt these companies through massive legal costs.
Output: Valid
You claimed that the Supreme Court gave the green light to all kinds of bans and restrictions on guns and ammunition, something that never took place.
Output: Valid
The crime comes from using the gun (or any other weapon) to violate the rights of others.
Output: Valid
Their argument was, that even if the right is deemed fundamental, the usual conditions that go with that designation should not be applied to the right to arms.
Output: Valid
Many countries sold, traded, destroyed, and/or donated these carbines to other countries and/or private gun brokers.
Output: Valid
Isn't the right to bear arms carved in the Constitution tablets that Jefferson brought down from Capitol Hill?
Output: Valid
One bust came in May, when the owner of a Phoenix gun shop was arrested on charges that he knowingly sold hundreds of weapons to "straw purchasers" who funneled the weapons to violent drug cartels in Mexico.
Output: Valid
How exactly, when the government has the power to arbitrarily regulate anything and everything, using the vague and abstract "quality of life" standard as a measuring stick, beneficial to the people overall?
Output: Valid
First, you claimed that gang bangers were buying guns at gun shows.
Output: Valid
How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
Output: Valid
After all, since these lethal weapons are only used to kill or maim, the police must only carry them to kill or maim, huh?
Output: Valid
How will this LA ordinance be able to address the issue of guns acquired out of state by straw purchasers.
Output: Valid