niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
You could argue that many in poverty cannot afford a gun as things currently stand.
Output: Valid
Why is a sign that says "NO GUNS" binding and legal but a sign saying "NO WOMEN" grounds for lawsuit?
Output: Valid
21 Most American gun owners are not violent criminals and will not be potential killers.
Output: Valid
Look at any country that has significantly tighter gun control laws than America, go far enough back and you'll eventually see that gun control was very simple at first.
Output: Valid
Then we should ban so stupid people can't kill people with guns.
Output: Valid
Lott claimes he lost a single footnote, ich showed that 98% of the time guns used definsivly only had to be brandished to be effective, which is in no way pivotal to his report.
Output: Valid
Then when a case like this comes along they take off running in the opposite direction, eager to distance themselves from anybody who would actually rebel against the government.
Output: Valid
One thing you gun grabbers will never understand...you lost your claim that the 2A was not an individual right.
Output: Valid
But of course I am no recognized historian, and my biases for gun rights are admittedly well documented on this blog cite.
Output: Valid
We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably asse
Output: Valid
The government then proceeded to quote at length from a Tennessee state court case interpreting ���Arms��� in the Tennessee Bill of Rights to mean weapons ���such as are usually employed in civilized warfare, and that constitute the ordinary military equipment.���
Output: Valid
In the time you have been here you have proven exactly one the many claims you have made; that being that the state of Georgia attempted to ban handgun ownership in 1837.
Output: Valid
You know as well as I do that we have a Large percentage of Patriotic Politicians in Washington, whom all take an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.
Output: Valid
That right there is reason enough not to give government absolute control over firearms.
Output: Valid
Based on previous statements made regarding the open carry movement in the state of California, the open carry ban was enacted not because of genuine concern by the people and politicians.
Output: Valid
However, in doing so, people also found out that the AR series were more accurate for hunting and target shooting, and a much more reliable design than previous hunting rifles.
Output: Valid
To generalize gun owners in this way must mean you're either a complete dick or that your government likes to keep you ignorant.
Output: Valid
That's what you seem to be doing since enough information is not provided to draw any conclusions about the relationship between guns and crime.
Output: Valid
I am as big a fan of the RKBA as there is, but I will be the first to say the RKBA is not a license to shoot people or run around as an armed drug dealer.
Output: Valid
When guns are moved from place to place, a young woman is often used as the courier because there is less risk of her being stopped and searched.
Output: Valid
And you don't do anything to address the fact that a hardened criminal who somehow did manage to get out on bail, would be free to just acquire another gun from black market sources.
Output: Valid
People who follow laws, aren't causing problems with the guns they own.
Output: Valid
The Eagle GunSafe�� Program teaches children in pre-K through third grade four important steps to take if they find a gun.
Output: Valid
The ease with which he had acquired it and carried out the assault leads to the creation of pressure groups, which eventually forces the federal government to set up a national gun control registry.
Output: Valid
(6) a certification by the applicant that the applicant will keep any firearm owned by the applicant safely stored and out of the possession of persons who have not attained 18 years of age;
Output: Valid
'The Chicago case is unlikely to have much practical impact on most gun laws regardless of how the court rules,' said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Output: Valid
Should a drug user, a felon, be banned from possessing WEAPONS, especially guns??
Output: Valid
When the individual approaches a doctor and indicates that they wish to engage in business, they are not longer choosing to be left alone and unnoticed.
Output: Invalid
* Assuming that the individual details in a survey which legally cannot be used in any means other than statistical will be made public, misunderstanding my point.
Output: Invalid
I know that we all would like to pretend we have the power to change the world, but for gun crimes you are dealing with the hardened hearts of men who are willing to take another���s life.
Output: Valid
Very few children are killed by firearm accidents compared to other causes of child deaths.
Output: Valid
I think a better debate would be when should gun control start?
Output: Valid
This is why I advocate explaining the costs of guns as much as possible, and fighting the gun lobby at every turn.
Output: Valid
If the Founding Fathers were referring to keeping and bearing arms for ANY legitimate purpose, they would have said so, in a SINGLE sentence or Amendment.
Output: Valid
Look online at firearm replicas and see how many retailers have statements about not being able to ship to certain states.
Output: Valid
Better than 99% of guns purchased never end up being used in a crime, but abortion KILLS better than 99% of the time!
Output: Valid
It's not exactly like criminals are looking for laws to exploit to arm themselves in order to carry out their crimes.
Output: Valid
Where is your true sympathy for folks like Suzanna Gratia Hupp who were disarmed by government edicts (unconstitutionally) while we arm our enemies of America and gun grabber/anti-Constitutionalists?
Output: Valid
But with six additional years of data now available for analysis, we think the need for further parsing of older data is of limited value in assessing the more guns, less crime hypothesis.
Output: Valid
I only support common sense gun control measures, thing such as no guns in schools, no guns on airplanes, background checks for the sale of all firearms, tougher sentences for crimes in which guns are used, etc.
Output: Valid
Ironically, both Lott and Handgun Control acknowledge that the reams of gun control laws on the books in Washington and in all 50 states have been ineffective in eradicating mass shootings or preventing children from bringing weapons to school.
Output: Valid
The higher rate of gun ownership by criminals is far outweighed by the threat of citizens owning guns.
Output: Valid
Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?
Output: Valid
Simple if the gun haters did not want your guns why do gun haters only want gun control laws that law abiding citizens obey and criminals do not?
Output: Valid
If most gun crimes are committed by illegal firearm holders then it means that legal ownership of firearms combined with government monitoring can have a positive effect.
Output: Valid
We may therefore conclude that, any reason or purpose for an individual owning a gun, OTHER THAN for a militia, is not provided for under the 2nd Amendment, and that current gun laws for private ownership of guns is mistaken.
Output: Valid
But guns aren't likely to do anything whatsoever, any more than cars are likely to drive or hammers are likely to strike.
Output: Valid
Gun grabbers are criminal because they advocate eliminating the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
Gun control laws, like handgun rationing, mandatory reporting standards, ammunition registries, secondary background checks, trigger lock and storage requirements, etc. are limited in their reach, sticking to only certain states.
Output: Valid
The second amendment means that all citizens have the potential right to bear arms as long as they pertain by the rules and obligations of modern society, such have having a license.
Output: Valid
The criminals already have plenty of guns, that means that ending gun ownership will play no real part in ending gun possession by criminals.
Output: Valid
And by the same token the anti-gun crowd believe that honest people can't be trusted, yet criminals can; unless there are laws that reinforce the Second Amendment right, which will make criminals more likely to get a gun.
Output: Valid
Or, to put it another way, more guns = more crime, and if we could stop the illegal gun running then we would have less guns = less crime.
Output: Valid
Just knowing that there are many Senators and Congressmen who would like to abolish gun rights gives credence to the fact that government could actually try to limit or ban the 2nd Amendment in the future.
Output: Valid
Various groups have been unable to show that the criminal use of firearms leads to more deaths than the number of lives that are saved by private and legal gun ownership.
Output: Valid
If more guns present means that more criminals will be able to commit more killings and violent criminals, wouldn't they have allowed the ban to remain in place?
Output: Valid
But gun hater pilot will demand that the right to bear arms be limited or banned to keep criminals from getting guns.
Output: Valid
I'm saying "false" in that answering 'A' would be wrong.
Output: Invalid
And so I disagree that the founders believed it was sufficient to have these rights protected by only common law.
Output: Valid
Would you want your children to go to a school where everyone was allowed to have a gun?
Output: Valid
Support was even higher among gun owners who were not involved with the NRA (88 percent favored lost or stolen handgun reporting).
Output: Valid
However, when a child gets shot with an UZI, for example, people on such websites are much more inclined to coldly ignore it or downplay such a tragedy by saying things like "accidents happen".
Output: Valid
They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
Output: Valid
The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
Output: Valid
His law is intended to largely accomplish by indirect taxation what the government has been prohibited from doing by a direct ban.
Output: Valid
Those who are bigger, stronger, and more violent, are free to prey on the rest of us (with the exception of the 20% or less that the police actually manage to catch).
Output: Valid
In my state, home burglary is a felony punished by a maximum sentence of 1-20 years, unless the burglar is armed with a deadly weapon when he breaks in, which increases the punishment to 20 years to life.
Output: Valid
The fact that somebody's willing to break the law and make a profit is reason enough to ban a legal product?
Output: Valid
Selective incorporation is a species of substantive due process, in which the rights the Due Process Clause protects include some of the substantive rights enumerated in the first eight amendments to the Constitution.
Output: Valid
And then the proposed federal Constitution comes along, which, if enacted, would radically alter the balance of control over the militia:
Output: Valid
They have repeatedly used Jared Loughner as an example of why concealed carry is a bad idea even though he cannot truthfully be considered a legal concealed carrier.
Output: Valid
Police are routinely armed with bullet-resistant armor, have a partner, can call for backup, and are able to carry large caliber firepower.
Output: Valid
Their only success has been violating the Constitution and killing women and children or just burning them to death and shooting nursing mothers.
Output: Valid
In one swoop this idea violates the right to privacy, the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment.
Output: Valid
Correspondingly, ammunition manufacturers are reporting record sales across the country as demand continues to outpace supply.
Output: Valid
You cannot defeat the facts about gun free zones��� failure to keep guns out of them so now you attack the messenger!
Output: Valid
Simply put, you should have to prove that the gun control you seek will do what you say it will do before burdening the Constitution with a load up of Liberal wishes and hopes!
Output: Valid
Keeping violent criminals in prison would do far more to reduce gun crime than banning guns.
Output: Valid
Within the United States, rural areas have higher rates of gun ownership and lower rates of murder, whites have higher rates of gun ownership than blacks and much lower murder rates.
Output: Valid
Now the courts have held in some instances, the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right and in some instances, it is a states right.
Output: Valid
So...you want laws dictating everything we can do with a gun...but when the laws spell out that we can't drink while armed, you're claiming that nobody will obey the law and drink anyway?
Output: Valid
The way I'm reading it, you're saying that the Second Amendment is about enabling the private military, which is under total governmental control, to be armed so it can crush any uprising whatsoever.
Output: Valid
If we had better guidelines in place, the mentally ill wouldn't get a hold of a gun, and if people were responsible with their weapons, children would not get a hold of them.
Output: Valid
The solution is for the right wing to keep and bear arms against the left wing anti Constitution criminals and whachos who commit crimes.
Output: Valid
Guns are becoming more easier to purchase and people are becoming more insane.humans are killing more innocent people everyday!
Output: Valid
And before Heller, numerous judges declared that the Second Amendment was nothing more than a collective right that belonged to the states, giving them permission to have private militia armies for their own defense.
Output: Valid
Or the belief that the militia is dependant on citizens being able to be armed as they see fit rather than the ownership of firearms being contingent upon militia service?
Output: Valid
The concept that guns violate rights is no different from the concept that spoons make people fat.
Output: Valid
Perhaps the Supreme Court's approach is a more realistic approach to the Second Amendment in our own day considering the increased risk to public safety that guns pose, but it still is revisionist.
Output: Valid
You can not buy a gun for your son, legally that is called a strawman purchase and is the most common way criminals obtain guns.
Output: Valid
But the argument that stricter gun laws in areas with more people from minority groups shows that gun control is racist is also entirely circumstantial.
Output: Valid
The pre-existing right to keep and bear arms was premised on the commonplace assumption that individuals would use them for these private purposes, in addition to whatever militia service they would be obligated to perform for the state.
Output: Valid
But until then, like the deaths of our agents and of the plethora of deaths of Mexicans in the Gun Walker scam, they are nothing but necessary and useful cannon fodder to Kill the 2nd Amendment.
Output: Valid
However although our constitution needs exceptions (no yelling "fire" in a movie theater, and background checks for guns), no rights in the bill of rights should be outright banned.
Output: Valid
Why in the name of god would you discuss acceptable reasons for domestic ownership of guns in a conference about curtailing illegal international gun trafficking?
Output: Valid
The problem is that widespread guns means greater criminal access to guns which means greater criminal gun use which means bad things.
Output: Valid
Innocent people were butchered where no guns were permitted, while nobody is being shot full of holes in the schools where carrying a gun is permitted.
Output: Valid
This will always serve you better than a firearm, which would only inject more violence into the situation.
Output: Valid
Please see other threads regarding the cost overrun of gun registration in Canada.
Output: Valid
Mexican authorities have been pressing the United States to do more to help a border force they describe as overwhelmed and often intimidated.
Output: Invalid
Civilians with other types of gun should be shot on sight by them.
Output: Valid
Stun guns should also last a lifetime - and have very few reliability issues.
Output: Valid
Then you don't understand the irony, because you've had no Jewish Presidents ... we've had Jewish Governors General.
Output: Invalid
I don't care about the number of people who buy guns or how many they buy per day or per month.
Output: Valid
Do you wish to offer your opinion on what impact the ban will have on California���s violent crime rate?
Output: Valid
States are claiming a gross usurpation of non delegated powers of Congress that rightly belongs to the States and or to the People, but powers that definitely have not been delegated to Congress.
Output: Valid
The feds have busted a police chief and a mayor for taking part in trafficking firearms to Mexico.
Output: Valid
Basically they're cowards and want to live another day to enjoy the fruits of their behaviour.
Output: Invalid
It sounds like the author wishes to use fear as a weapon to unconstitutionally restrict the RKBA.
Output: Valid
I still think the term commoner is a better definition when applied to non-members of the political caste, particularly when it comes to gun legislation.
Output: Valid
Targeting people who had registered their guns is a preventative measure, said Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair.
Output: Valid
Also, I think your illegal gun and Constitution analogy, as a double standard, is a bad one.
Output: Valid
Of course "immediate" is sufficiently vague to guarantee other challenges.
Output: Valid
You obviously have no experienced with even holding a gun first hand, otherwise you wouldn't have to ask such a stupid question.
Output: Valid
Familiarizing six year olds with firearms when not living in a rural setting doesn't seem sensible to me.
Output: Valid
If you managed to remove all firearms from America (which will never ever happen), then I would just use a knife or bow.
Output: Valid
So I have a right to carry a gun into your house?
Output: Valid
Why can a state attach limits "in their own individual RKBA" (such as prohibited concealed carry) that supercede the second amendment- unless the second amendment does not protect concealed carry.
Output: Valid
Furthermore, the Founders envisioned people being armed with much less powerful weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
Output: Valid
Every slave-owning civilization in history has had two things in common: they've tried to keep their slaves from owning weapons (besides Gladiators), and they've tried to keep their slaves as ignorant as possible.
Output: Valid
The reality is that in developed nations with stricter gun laws than the US there are less outlaws owning and using guns.
Output: Valid
It's quite obvious by this and as well as the SCOTUS decision that the right to keep and bear arms is not dependent on the militia part, but the other way around.
Output: Valid
All one can reasonably conclude is that more firearms does not increase the homicide rate, nor does less guns reduce it.
Output: Valid
[Exempting the Vice President, federal judicial and executive officers, congressmen and congressional officers, custom-house officers and clerks, post-officers and postal stage drivers, ferrymen on post roads, export inspectors, pilots, merchant mariners, and people exempted under the laws of their states
Output: Invalid
What puzzles me is that Gun control advocates will not change their unrealistic ideas when presented the facts.
Output: Valid
Of course, nothing in the text of the Second Amendment places location-based limits on the right to keep and bear arms.
Output: Valid
We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
Output: Valid
At the time the constitution was written, the militia, which was to be armed with privately owned weapons, was supposed to be our nations primary military force.
Output: Valid
Whenever government mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.
Output: Valid
I like guns as much as the normal person does but if guns are abused by people, we need restictions.
Output: Valid
It is interesting how people that want to ban the right to bear arms never apply their logic to the rights they like.
Output: Valid
NY responds by arguing that their gun restriction scheme cannot get a fair test to prove its worth because gun runners evade the restrictions by going to other states with less restrictive laws to import the guns illegally.
Output: Valid
I see you always use gun crime rates as an argument, are you totally uninterested in other types of violent crimes, what happens when all guns are banned and we only have knife crimes?
Output: Valid
The criminal homicides almost always include illegally gotten guns- so that's not relevant either as gun control laws won't change that.
Output: Valid
Gun haters if the 2nd amend did not protect the right to bear arms then all guns in America would be banned.
Output: Valid
But the access of innocent citizens will go up way more than that of criminals, thus less criminals will want to commit a robbery or something with the fear of the person living there owning a gun.
Output: Valid
You didn't address that since we have started adding more and more gun control that violent crimes have gone up and how even though America is #1 in gun ownership it tanks only 107th in homicide rates.
Output: Valid
However when a militia group makes the news, these same anti-gunners are quick to paint them as dangerous, anti-government, and even racist extremists, and an example of why gun control needs to be further tightened.
Output: Valid
Government(s) definitely have to regulate themselves as far as gun laws go because the 2nd Amendment, even though it is vaguely written, is definitely at the top of people's lists of important rights.
Output: Valid
Gun ownership is a protected right, and the fact that criminals use guns in the commission of crime will never change this fact.
Output: Valid
Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Output: Valid
Now that said, one has to wonder why people for gun control or anti gun types keep telling people that defend the right to bear arms that they could not win a fight.
Output: Valid
If you cannot demonstrate that more citizens owning guns leads to more violent crime, if the stats in fact support the opposite, what reason is there to ban guns?
Output: Valid
In particular, does the reader feel that the worthy law enforcement goal of eliminating gun crime justifies the sacrifice of the individual right to keep and bear them?
Output: Valid
Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.
Output: Valid
Why is it legal to ban marijuana but not to ban guns or cigarettes?
Output: Valid
Still waiting for a report of an armed citizen or group of armed citizens being involved in something as egregarious as this incident that you cling to and pronounce as a reason to demolish the Second Amendment.
Output: Valid
(5) The Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners��� Protection Act of 1986, and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere.
Output: Valid
The second amendment is in place to ensure that americans always have at their disposal the tools neccessary to protect themselves from tyranny.
Output: Valid
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
Output: Valid
Finally it mentions that Swiss "gun control" is not the reason for the low crime rates and, granted, it also mentions that this system is not proof that more guns means less crime.
Output: Valid
The opposite of "more guns = less crime is not true" is not "more guns = more crime".
Output: Valid
You've made the argument that registration of firearms is perfectly legal and constitutional, despite the fact that the Firearm Owners Protection Act forbids any and all type of database of guns or gun owners.
Output: Valid
I could easily point out how many people are killed by criminals because they aren't armed and able to fight back, and that could be seen as grounds for removing the restrictive gun laws we have in this country.
Output: Valid
Now if you want gun control laws that limit or ban the right to bear arms you are a gun haters.
Output: Valid
The right to bear arms is explicit and clear in the second amendment.
Output: Valid
Heck, in the UK cops used to only carry clubs, now they carry guns, body armour, and are not allowed to patrol alone.
Output: Valid
Too many gun control proponents try to suggest that the RKBA does not exist in our own Constitution, and that our Constitution trumps these older English rights.
Output: Valid
But is the answer to take down the gun free zones...and just allow kids to carry guns to school?
Output: Valid
Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
Output: Valid
To support this open carry ban, you have argued that no right exists to carry a loaded handgun outside the home���making them useless and therefore the ban is just sweeping up the crumbs.
Output: Valid
Gun controllers make us conclude that they are being disingenuous, and even using these crime factors to further their aim of more and more and more and even more gun control.
Output: Valid
Children are not taught the history or meaning of the Second Amendment in school, nor do they learn later as adults.
Output: Valid
The legal market for firearms gets killed off in hopes of hindering criminals, and instead the criminals continue buying from the black market, importing them illegally, or making their weapons themselves.
Output: Valid
This question has pretty much become a circus, with you trying to convince me that ccw states will not pursue illegal carriers, and that if you have a gun, all the criminals will have a gun.
Output: Valid
CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BROKEN BOTH GUN LAWS AND MURDER LAWS, not just 'criminals', we have plenty of people in jail for things other than murder by gun.
Output: Valid
While their by no means should be an outlaw of guns, I do believe restrictions should be put in place.
Output: Valid
The embraced anti-gun rights interpretation of the 2nd was that it was a provision that had but one function and intent, to protect the "state right" to organize and control their militia from federal interference.
Output: Valid
It's also silly to argue that the Second Amendment only protects arms in common use.
Output: Valid
In 1997, their ability to enforce gun laws and make firearm arrests was enhanced by a quadrupling of the number of officers assigned to the program."
Output: Valid
Thanks to the McDonald case it's been established as a point of law that the Second Amendment is not just an individual right, but a fundamental right that binds all 50 states.
Output: Valid
See Subaru's posts if you want real false dichotomy, suggesting that we either ban guns or we're inhuman scum that's fit to be wiped off the face of the planet.
Output: Valid
If guns are banned, the only people who will surrender them are those who commit nearly no gun crime at all.
Output: Valid
That includes populations, gun homicides, non gun homicides and households with weapons in them.
Output: Valid
Amendment militia preamble is no different: ���A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state������a state in which the citizen need not fear the ambitions of a would-be military tyrant at the head of a standing army.
Output: Valid
I feel like existing laws need to actually be enforced and new ones targeted at those they are created for and not at legal law abiding gun owners.
Output: Valid
a) You are required to be willing to engage in honest debate, which requires reading links and responding to legitimate questions.
Output: Invalid
Then why are you opposed to the innocent fighting for their own lives instead of hopeing the police will get there in time?
Output: Valid
I doubt gun activists would be impressed if I claimed they were wrong and then provided a link to Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence as support.
Output: Valid
Presumably, the cops knew if there was a gun in the homicide house since they searched it (even if it was not used in the homicide.)
Output: Valid
In such cases you are protecting against a violent felony offense which endangers your life and anyone else in the home, and you are then allowed to use deadly force to defend your home.
Output: Valid
It also bans the use of any device not attached to the firearm, such as shooting boxes, insulated rooms and down range baffles.
Output: Valid
Again, the decisions I'm referring to as "activist" are those that are granting powers to the government that are not enumerated.
Output: Valid
I guess the criminals are comfortable with the fact they will not be confronted with a armed citizen.
Output: Valid
Justice Souter gave indications he favored a narrow individual right view which ties the right closely to individual militia service.
Output: Valid
As far as I know, there is nothing to keep people from living the life they profess to maintain in the open.
Output: Valid
I also would bet that you have never had any formal training governing the use of deadly force by State instructors nor other top rated self defense experts in the field.
Output: Valid
The civilian firearm market is the primary source of hardware for criminals.
Output: Valid
The ATF is trying to single out gun manufactures to be responsible for policing customers.
Output: Valid
Well on the one hand some schools insist that their guards don't need guns to maintain the peace, I say that's a stupid idea.
Output: Valid
Your entire approach is akin to trying to hold bank robbers to jaywalking laws.
Output: Valid
You took an industry that previously sold how ever many guns that correspond with about 8 million background checks a year and pushed that figure to 14 million background checks a year.
Output: Valid
putting your family in all that danger because youre nuts about guns is immoral
Output: Valid
While a .45 ACP can't stop a plane, it can certainly do the job of killing an enemy soldier with a single shot to the head.
Output: Valid
But if even a single legal gun is introduced into the equation the result will be a long and drawn out firefight with the potential to kill many.
Output: Valid
ATF has analyzed firearms seizures in Mexico from FY 2005-07 and identified the following weapons most commonly used by drug traffickers:
Output: Valid
Once again gun haters you need to visit atf web site to see what is legal before you allow your mouth to over run you backside!
Output: Valid
That is why no ordinary individual in the US has the right to police protection.
Output: Valid
Again, the researchers found no protective benefits of gun ownership.
Output: Valid
Rather than confer protection, guns kept in the home are associated with an increase in the risk of homicide by a family member or intimate acquaintance. "
Output: Valid
I agree that it���s terrible that no one was able to stop the individual in this case, but I���m not sure that extreme answers that could cause other problems are necessarily good solutions to isolated mass shooting incidents.
Output: Valid
Right now all the police can do is try and match bullets against other bullets in an attempt to determine which gun was used.
Output: Valid
As a comparison on how much effect that an Assault Weapons ban would have on crime, even if they confiscated them all.
Output: Valid
You take away my right, then I take away your rights in spite, and then this all starts a war no one benefits from, and no one wants!
Output: Valid
In 1968, after nearly a decade of high-profile political assassinations, Congress passed the most stringent firearms regulations since the 1930s, despite the vigorous protests of the gun lobby.
Output: Valid
As a counter-fact, the UK hasn't had any school shootings since defensive guns were banned; the ban being put in place after (and largely due to) a school shooting.
Output: Valid
Democrats have abandoned the campaign platform of firearms restriction laws because they have learned such a position is political suicide.
Output: Valid
Evidently, (from the research I've done) we are required to insert people into the experiment in order to make inanimate objects do things.
Output: Valid
After hearing you guys argue for weapons on planes, I have officially lost any respect that I had for those defending the right to guns.
Output: Valid
I keep guns for the exact reason you state, when the government starts to interpret my rights for me, is when I get my gets and start shooting "them".
Output: Valid
When a person walks into a gun shop with the expressed idea of buying a gun to kill someone - in a premeditatd act - that - is a problem isn't it.
Output: Valid
Whilst true that guns do not kill people, they provide those with the ability to kill.
Output: Valid
CBS has new revelation in Zapata slaying, and Sen. Grassley is not happy - Seattle gun rights | Examiner.com
Output: Invalid
I for one would rather be able to defend my children without the risk of trying to overpower another person to keep the bat from hitting my children.
Output: Valid
Offenses committed with all types of firearms, including air guns, have also increased.
Output: Valid
More and more mayors in the little MAIG group are being charged with felony offenses for various crimes they've committed, meaning Bloomberg's gang is a mess of criminals.
Output: Valid
One can examine 19th century legal treates and find "When words of the enacting clause are clear and positive, recourse must not be had to the preamble."
Output: Valid
Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishments (not incorporated until 1962).
Output: Valid
If constitutional protection applies to ammunition then there's no reason to believe it doesn't extend to other vital components required for operation.
Output: Valid
There is NO possibility that background checks would pass even an intermediate scrutiny test.
Output: Valid
At least it does show self defense is now recognized as a legal deterrant and perfectly normal, lawful act that cannot be discredited.
Output: Valid
What part of the Constitution is this 'right to protection' from second hand smoke?
Output: Valid
First, right after the weeping victims, Moore puts on Heston's "I have only five words for you . . . cold dead hands" statement, making it seem directed at them.
Output: Valid
I will happily engage in a 30 page debate with most people here, with responses going into the thousands of words.
Output: Invalid
My arguments with you guys are intentionally very black and white because of the way you guys argue: you in particular dance all around an issue and never directly answer a question.
Output: Valid
So we need to know what actions the author of the article refers to with the comment ���the weapons-brandishing displays are 'intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population.'
Output: Valid
How many car races like the Indy 500 or Daytona 500 have been canceled when there have been car accidents killing kids days before the race?
Output: Valid
Well I guess that nationwide handgun ban is doing the trick then.
Output: Valid
Could it possibly be because no one else buys it���or that they are unwilling to commit to you because you cannot argue it effectively?
Output: Valid
I'm not attacking anybody's position, I'm asking honest questions because like I said, I'm speaking from more of a common sense approach than from a position of extensive knowledge on the subject.
Output: Valid
And Gary Schoener, a clinical psychologist who has been diagnosing and treating clergy abuse for 28 years, told Salon.com, "There are far more heterosexual cases than homosexual."
Output: Valid
While slavery was at one time legal, it was not legal as a result of the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
Output: Invalid
I'm more concerned with the concept of why the individual that committed the murder was able to kill in the first place.
Output: Valid
To argue that there are more ethical defensive means than firearms is stupid in my opinion.
Output: Valid
Whoever is making this 90 to 95% claim is practicing the exact same dishonest and using the exact same tactics as the discredited professor Kellerman.
Output: Valid
Data from the Joint Precision Strike Demonstration Project Office indicates that the crew then needs two minutes to lower the launcher, raise the stabilizing pads, and quickly return to the UGF.
Output: Valid
I implied that there are people with guns that are nuts, not that all gun owners are nuts...
Output: Valid
I would argue, for example, that since so called ���assault weapons��� are not as common today as handguns then they must be more ���dangerous and unususal��� and therefore more subject to a ban.
Output: Valid
What exactly is reasonable about a ban on commonly available firearms that're equipped with certain cosmetic features that play absolutely no part on the overall functionality of the firearm?
Output: Valid
The first is whether a mandatory law would deter home burglaries to begin with, and the second is whether they would help prevent or deter gun theft in the event of a burglary.
Output: Valid
Please tell the murder victims in these other countries that gun control works.
Output: Valid
To solve this gun buyers should be encouraged to attend a gun safety class.
Output: Valid
It doesnt say you have the right to shoot arms so it would be okay to ban bullets.
Output: Valid
The figures for the number of gun related deaths in the US should be evidence enough that 'the people' cannot be trusted with guns.
Output: Valid
The organized militia is equivalent to the well regulated militia of the second amendment.
Output: Valid
We must be doing something right because our violent crime rates are dropping while your native country keeps rising in spite of gun and knife bans.
Output: Valid
[28] Since none of Handgun Control Inc.'s Brady I or Brady II suggestions impact on the source of 93% of crime guns, their symbolic nostrums cannot be expected to do anything to reduce crime or violence.
Output: Valid
Here's the thing...the Second Amendment and the right to be armed for your own defense isn't just a right, it's a fundamental, human, and individual right.
Output: Valid
Or maybe that implementing gun control is too cost prohibitive to be effective and thus an exercise in futility and serves no logical purpose?
Output: Valid
Law enforcement has no obligation to protect or defend any citizen, not even when a restraining order is in place.
Output: Valid
The gun wont kill you without someone behind it, not all people have the right reasons for haveing a gun, but does that mean people who do have the right reasons will be punished and left unarmed, and defensless?
Output: Valid
We can never make something 100% safe, only safer, but letting everyone carry a gun on a plane is certainly not the answer.
Output: Valid
The Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, a division of Handgun Control, Inc., disagreed with Lott's findings, as well as the overall assumption that a reduction in the availability of guns in society reduces violent crime.
Output: Valid
Bloomberg wants to ATF to view anyone attending a gun show as absolutely guilty, and subject to arrest, detainment and prosecution without evidence or witnesses, thus violating a person's Sixth Amendment rights.
Output: Valid
The ban was put in place by the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act, designed to correct the erronius Gun Control Act of 1968.
Output: Valid
This broader definition is used to cover general crimes committed with firearms (like possession by felons, armed career criminal violations, etc.)
Output: Valid
Therefore, the clichet term "if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns" comes into play.
Output: Valid
1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.
Output: Valid
In the fifteen years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state.
Output: Valid
NATO, Galileo has claimed that these laws are designed to reduce criminal use of guns (which would have to mean that they target the people, not the guns).
Output: Valid
This was an interesting one because it seperated militia from the right to bear arms, including specifically stating that a state cannot deprive a person of that right.
Output: Valid
However, I am concerned that the selective release of certain statistical data without further clarification and categorization may inaccurately reflect the scope and source of the problem of firearms in Mexico and the DTO violence.
Output: Valid
Rather it is more beneficial to engage others in a discussion in their own threads to discuss matters on what would be regarded as "their home turf."
Output: Invalid
If theses non-lead rounds irreversibly damage the rifle bores on older weapons there could be major lawsuits at be had because the matter wasn't properly researched.
Output: Valid
Or a Democratic President saying "if they bring a knife to the fight we bring a gun".
Output: Valid
Every fear of theirs is there in your positions; you use the words to invent a regulating power, you use the words to erect strict conditioning and qualifications on the right merely recognized and secured by the Amendment.
Output: Valid
Neither one of these is reasonable cause to be against gun ownership, they're reasons to see a psychiatrist and get over it.
Output: Valid
So now you're saying that the drug cartels are getting all those anti-aircraft cannons and rocket propelled grenades and fragmentation grenades, for absolutely nothing?
Output: Valid
...and you are right, there is no credibility to a "needs based exercise of the right to keep and bear arms".
Output: Valid
I would wager that those (85%) have no idea what the gun laws are and once the Supreme Court gets through and does a lot of deleting as it has already begun, then 100% will like the changes.
Output: Valid
The racist origins of gun control laws are well known by those who seek the truth.... The liberals, the media like to ignore that....
Output: Valid
That is exactly what will happen with new gun control, the people who break the existing laws will mere just scoff at the new ones.
Output: Valid
Note that those advocating allowing atomic bombs to be owned by citizens would be the ones correct by the Constitution.
Output: Valid
I'll freely admit that there is a larger jump between guns and nukes than knives and guns, but there is still a direct difference in lethality.
Output: Valid
If I were the AG, and I were bent on trying to find out if a person has bought firearms, then I would first run a name search through a database like Accurint.
Output: Valid
There is no legitimate purpose in this task force even being convened for the purpose of analyzing the laws of the state of Florida as laws do not facilitate murder.
Output: Valid
(We all know those missile launchers, machine guns, and grenades are soooooooo easy to buy from your local gun shop, huh!)
Output: Valid
However, the people of Washington, D.C. should me made aware that their right to keep and bear arms does not come from the Federal government, the Constitution or their local government.
Output: Valid
Gun Facts Version 5.0Page 28 Copyright 2008, Guy Smith Fact: ���I ... [felt] that such legislation present[ed] a clear and present danger to law-abiding citizens by placing more handguns on our streets.
Output: Valid
Almost without exception, murderers are extreme aberrants with lifelong histories of crime, substance abuse, psychopathology, mental retardation and/or irrational violence against those around them, as well as other hazardous behavior, e.g., automobile and gun accidents."
Output: Valid
In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
Output: Valid
The definition is simple: the unorganized militia is every last American citizen that's able to legally buy or own a gun.
Output: Valid
If England wants to ban weapons, that is quite alright, but we should not trade with htem as long as they are violating the human rights of their citizens.
Output: Valid
As a federal enclave they must not be allowed to disregard the Constitution, and instead must be forced to obey only the federal laws already on the books and no others.
Output: Valid
(or, for those who favor the alternative collective right view, ���the right of militia members to keep and bear their militia arms when called for by the state for militia service?���)
Output: Valid
A lot of the most popular laws (unconstitutional in my estimation from many court cases) were examined by the CDC and NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE and found no benefit IN ANY OF THE CURRENT ILLEGAL GUN REGULATION/BAN LAWS.
Output: Valid
Interesting how some people insist that the RKBA is not limited by the militia, but here you let "arms" in the second amendment be limited according to the militia.
Output: Valid
Please respond to your opponents comments that you have taken "the right to keep and bear arms" statement and used it without the context specifically "the well regulated militia".
Output: Valid
Everything else said is just a way to suck We the People out of our Constitutionally recognized, as Inalienable, Rights to Keep and Bear Arms!
Output: Valid
Sinjin claims that mandatory storage laws would cut down on the number of guns that are stolen from people when they're out and away from their homes.
Output: Valid
They will not only confiscate the guns, but then charge the owners of those guns for being terrorists.
Output: Valid
Yet the gun industry easily found ways around the law and most of these weapons are now sold in post-ban models virtually identical to the guns Congress sought to ban in 1994."
Output: Valid
Or how about their opinion that plastic pellet guns are considered true guns, only to immediately reverse their previous decision?
Output: Valid
You gun control advocates keep talking about ballistic finger printing like it is some God send that is going to drastically reduce crime.
Output: Valid
I don't even carry a gun concealed nor openly, but I have to defend what is right, just because it is right!
Output: Valid
The Seventh Circuit described the rationale of those cases as ���defunct��� and recognized that they did not consider the question whether the Fourteenth Amendment���s Due Process Clause incorporates the Second Amendment right to keep andbear arms.
Output: Valid
You wanna be gun grabbers and anti rights activists are giving each other a 'high five' for scoring a goal for your opposition.
Output: Valid
That's still pretty outrageous to claim, especially given you keep saying only 44 States prohibit the restriction of guns.
Output: Valid
As you may know, the Revolutionary War started when the British came to both Lexington and Concord to seize the gun powder stores, collecting guns along the way.
Output: Valid
You can not use this as evidence that the reduction in crime is due to the gun ban.
Output: Valid
ATF then obtains the sale records which every FFL dealer is required to maintain for every firearm and learns when the gun was received by the dealer and when and to whom the particular gun was sold.
Output: Valid
they are in disarray and grasping for any stick to hold onto in the flood of falling gun control agenda and laws.
Output: Valid