niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: The movie is an adaptation of Peter Shaffer's play of the same name, which suffers from the same criticism of historical accuracy. I can't find any references to hand, but I imagine that Shaffer was using the historical setting to stage a story of artistic genius and professional rivalry that makes such a good story, and that accuracy was somewhat secondary. It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals, and that Mozart fairly obviously was the more successful - but it is also clear that their rivalry did not descend into hatred nor that Salieri had any part in Mozart's death, despite rumors. On a positive front the movie makes it very clear that Salieri admires and respects Mozart's abilities, and you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills.  <sep>  Q: Why is the Salieri-Mozart relationship projected falsely in the movie Amadeus? A: you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills  Q: So, are you saying it wasn't based on factual events? A: It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there any particular reason why Salleri is projected as a character who despised Mozart?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The movie is an adaptation of Peter Shaffer's play of the same name, which suffers from the same criticism of historical accuracy. I can't find any references to hand, but I imagine that Shaffer was using the historical setting to stage a story of artistic genius and professional rivalry that makes such a good story, and that accuracy was somewhat secondary. It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals, and that Mozart fairly obviously was the more successful - but it is also clear that their rivalry did not descend into hatred nor that Salieri had any part in Mozart's death, despite rumors. On a positive front the movie makes it very clear that Salieri admires and respects Mozart's abilities, and you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills.  <sep>  Q: Why is the Salieri-Mozart relationship projected falsely in the movie Amadeus? A: you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills  Q: So, are you saying it wasn't based on factual events? A: It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals  Q: Is there any particular reason why Salleri is projected as a character who despised Mozart? A: I imagine that Shaffer was using the historical setting to stage a story of artistic genius and professional rivalry that makes such a good story, and that accuracy was somewhat secondary  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Shaffer the director?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Is that some kind of inside joke to the show or the area the show is supposed to take place in?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Is that some kind of inside joke to the show or the area the show is supposed to take place in? A: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Is that some kind of inside joke to the show or the area the show is supposed to take place in? A: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only  Q: Is there anything else you can tell me? A: With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh I see, what was the joke exactly? It don't really seem too funny to me.
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Is that some kind of inside joke to the show or the area the show is supposed to take place in? A: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only  Q: Is there anything else you can tell me? A: With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content  Q: Oh I see, what was the joke exactly? It don't really seem too funny to me. A: FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the difference of FM and AM other than what they play?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Bob's Burgers "FM" references
Output: No
CONTEXT: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only. With Tina, the joke is not about the availability of FM but about the content. FM is dominated by recently-recorded popular music, and AM stations are more likely to play oldies and news and call-in advice programs - the kind of stuff kids don't want to listen to, execpt maybe Tina because she's weird. Zeke's comment means he's bored by the entertainment being provided by Tina, and wants something more exciting.  <sep>  Q: Is that some kind of inside joke to the show or the area the show is supposed to take place in? A: In the cab, the joke is that the car is so old and/or cheaply built that Bob expected the radio to be AM only  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How old was the car?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Let's look at the two circumstances that resulted in her move. The Bet Monica and Rachel lose the apartment after a game with Joey and Chandler. When Joey and Chandler are moving in, Rachel seems to think it's a joke. Think about it for a second, if someone told you to get up and move into another apartment, especially one that seems smaller than Monica's would you do it? Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it, if she were to move, she would have to spend time re-customizing it. Chandler Moves In Remember again, Rachel didn't think she would have to move out, she thought Chandler would move in, and it would be the three of them. However, the circumstances are different, after Las Vegas, Monica and Chandler agree to move in together. She attempts to move in with Ross, but they are still married unknowing to Rachel until the lawyer calls, at which point she furious. She eventually moves in with Phoebe, but the apartment burns down. This leaves Joey which means, Naked Thursdays or Wednesdays ;D. Out of necessity she moves in with Joey. She still lives close to her friends, and she doesn't need to get to know a new roommate.  <sep>  Q: Why does Rachel hate living at the other apartment?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Let's look at the two circumstances that resulted in her move. The Bet Monica and Rachel lose the apartment after a game with Joey and Chandler. When Joey and Chandler are moving in, Rachel seems to think it's a joke. Think about it for a second, if someone told you to get up and move into another apartment, especially one that seems smaller than Monica's would you do it? Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it, if she were to move, she would have to spend time re-customizing it. Chandler Moves In Remember again, Rachel didn't think she would have to move out, she thought Chandler would move in, and it would be the three of them. However, the circumstances are different, after Las Vegas, Monica and Chandler agree to move in together. She attempts to move in with Ross, but they are still married unknowing to Rachel until the lawyer calls, at which point she furious. She eventually moves in with Phoebe, but the apartment burns down. This leaves Joey which means, Naked Thursdays or Wednesdays ;D. Out of necessity she moves in with Joey. She still lives close to her friends, and she doesn't need to get to know a new roommate.  <sep>  Q: Why does Rachel hate living at the other apartment? A: smaller  Q: Any other reasons? A: Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What does she hate about it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Let's look at the two circumstances that resulted in her move. The Bet Monica and Rachel lose the apartment after a game with Joey and Chandler. When Joey and Chandler are moving in, Rachel seems to think it's a joke. Think about it for a second, if someone told you to get up and move into another apartment, especially one that seems smaller than Monica's would you do it? Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it, if she were to move, she would have to spend time re-customizing it. Chandler Moves In Remember again, Rachel didn't think she would have to move out, she thought Chandler would move in, and it would be the three of them. However, the circumstances are different, after Las Vegas, Monica and Chandler agree to move in together. She attempts to move in with Ross, but they are still married unknowing to Rachel until the lawyer calls, at which point she furious. She eventually moves in with Phoebe, but the apartment burns down. This leaves Joey which means, Naked Thursdays or Wednesdays ;D. Out of necessity she moves in with Joey. She still lives close to her friends, and she doesn't need to get to know a new roommate.  <sep>  Q: Why does Rachel hate living at the other apartment? A: smaller  Q: Any other reasons? A: Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it  Q: What does she hate about it? A: seems smaller than Monica's  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Anything else you can tell me about the show?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Let's look at the two circumstances that resulted in her move. The Bet Monica and Rachel lose the apartment after a game with Joey and Chandler. When Joey and Chandler are moving in, Rachel seems to think it's a joke. Think about it for a second, if someone told you to get up and move into another apartment, especially one that seems smaller than Monica's would you do it? Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it, if she were to move, she would have to spend time re-customizing it. Chandler Moves In Remember again, Rachel didn't think she would have to move out, she thought Chandler would move in, and it would be the three of them. However, the circumstances are different, after Las Vegas, Monica and Chandler agree to move in together. She attempts to move in with Ross, but they are still married unknowing to Rachel until the lawyer calls, at which point she furious. She eventually moves in with Phoebe, but the apartment burns down. This leaves Joey which means, Naked Thursdays or Wednesdays ;D. Out of necessity she moves in with Joey. She still lives close to her friends, and she doesn't need to get to know a new roommate.  <sep>  Q: Why does Rachel hate living at the other apartment? A: smaller  Q: Any other reasons? A: Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: did she like living in Joey and Chandler's apartment?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Let's look at the two circumstances that resulted in her move. The Bet Monica and Rachel lose the apartment after a game with Joey and Chandler. When Joey and Chandler are moving in, Rachel seems to think it's a joke. Think about it for a second, if someone told you to get up and move into another apartment, especially one that seems smaller than Monica's would you do it? Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it, if she were to move, she would have to spend time re-customizing it. Chandler Moves In Remember again, Rachel didn't think she would have to move out, she thought Chandler would move in, and it would be the three of them. However, the circumstances are different, after Las Vegas, Monica and Chandler agree to move in together. She attempts to move in with Ross, but they are still married unknowing to Rachel until the lawyer calls, at which point she furious. She eventually moves in with Phoebe, but the apartment burns down. This leaves Joey which means, Naked Thursdays or Wednesdays ;D. Out of necessity she moves in with Joey. She still lives close to her friends, and she doesn't need to get to know a new roommate.  <sep>  Q: Why does Rachel hate living at the other apartment? A: smaller  Q: Any other reasons? A: Her bed room is probably customized the way she likes it  Q: What does she hate about it? A: seems smaller than Monica's  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many episodes did they make?
Output: No
CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on.  <sep>  Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on.  <sep>  Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it a good technique?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on.  <sep>  Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking  Q: Is it a good technique? A: This irks me  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it realistic?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on.  <sep>  Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking  Q: Is it a good technique? A: This irks me  Q: Is it realistic? A: it isn't realistic  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why do, they use this technique?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on.  <sep>  Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking  Q: Is it a good technique? A: This irks me  Q: Is it realistic? A: it isn't realistic  Q: Why do, they use this technique? A: it clearly shows the audience what's going on  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it misleading?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power? A: We have an answer in the finale episode  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the answer in the finale episode?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power? A: We have an answer in the finale episode  Q: What is the answer in the finale episode? A: Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can share with me?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power? A: We have an answer in the finale episode  Q: What is the answer in the finale episode? A: Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him  Q: Is there anything else you can share with me? A: f Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Barry get trapped in Devoe's mind?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power? A: We have an answer in the finale episode  Q: What is the answer in the finale episode? A: Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did Barry enter Devoe's mind?
Output: No
CONTEXT: We have an answer in the finale episode: Devoe anticipated most of the events of this season so that Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him. But, if Barry became trapped in Devoe's mind, the Thinker would have access to past, present and future knowledge through Barry's connection to Speed Force. This, combined with the Enlightenment where people would have mentally regressed, would have made the Thinker a god.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Devoe take Barry's power? A: We have an answer in the finale episode  Q: What is the answer in the finale episode? A: Barry decided to enter Devoe's mind to fight him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it because Devoe can only absorb the powers of the bus metas?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled. The world that they show follows the rules and strict principals. Divergent people do not necessarily follow these rules and it is speculated that sooner or later they will break out of the norms and defy the principles and rules of the world and will be a danger for themselves and for everyone else since they will disrupt the smooth flow of life around them. Apart from that, I guess another reason would be that they will question the system and demand justification for the housing system as to why is there a need of dividing everyone based on their test results. The authority would not allow that so they fear them and hate them  <sep>  Q: Why does everyone fear the Divergents?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled. The world that they show follows the rules and strict principals. Divergent people do not necessarily follow these rules and it is speculated that sooner or later they will break out of the norms and defy the principles and rules of the world and will be a danger for themselves and for everyone else since they will disrupt the smooth flow of life around them. Apart from that, I guess another reason would be that they will question the system and demand justification for the housing system as to why is there a need of dividing everyone based on their test results. The authority would not allow that so they fear them and hate them  <sep>  Q: Why does everyone fear the Divergents? A: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do the Erudites want to eradicate them just because they can't be controlled or are they a danger to civilization in some other way.
Output: No
CONTEXT: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled. The world that they show follows the rules and strict principals. Divergent people do not necessarily follow these rules and it is speculated that sooner or later they will break out of the norms and defy the principles and rules of the world and will be a danger for themselves and for everyone else since they will disrupt the smooth flow of life around them. Apart from that, I guess another reason would be that they will question the system and demand justification for the housing system as to why is there a need of dividing everyone based on their test results. The authority would not allow that so they fear them and hate them  <sep>  Q: Why does everyone fear the Divergents? A: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is the premise for this movie, that civilization only survives if there is a Big Brother in control of everyone?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled. The world that they show follows the rules and strict principals. Divergent people do not necessarily follow these rules and it is speculated that sooner or later they will break out of the norms and defy the principles and rules of the world and will be a danger for themselves and for everyone else since they will disrupt the smooth flow of life around them. Apart from that, I guess another reason would be that they will question the system and demand justification for the housing system as to why is there a need of dividing everyone based on their test results. The authority would not allow that so they fear them and hate them  <sep>  Q: Why does everyone fear the Divergents? A: The reason for the hatred and feeling of fear towards divergent is because they cannot be controlled  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there some great idea backing the idea that mind control is necessary for society to function?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's a figure of speech, sometimes when people speak, they refer themselves in third person perspective. Could be various reasons. In some cultures, people usually address themselves in third person perspective because they believe that addressing themselves in first person is not good. This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person. Illeism is sometimes used in literature as a stylistic device. In real life usage, illeism can reflect a number of different stylistic intentions or involuntary circumstances. In this matter, Sparrow refers herself in third person because she needs to give the herself lofty airs, to puff herself up or illustrate her egoism.  <sep>  Q: Why does Golden Sparrow always use "she" instead of "I" or "My"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's a figure of speech, sometimes when people speak, they refer themselves in third person perspective. Could be various reasons. In some cultures, people usually address themselves in third person perspective because they believe that addressing themselves in first person is not good. This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person. Illeism is sometimes used in literature as a stylistic device. In real life usage, illeism can reflect a number of different stylistic intentions or involuntary circumstances. In this matter, Sparrow refers herself in third person because she needs to give the herself lofty airs, to puff herself up or illustrate her egoism.  <sep>  Q: Why does Golden Sparrow always use "she" instead of "I" or "My"? A: This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is Golden Sparrow royalty?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's a figure of speech, sometimes when people speak, they refer themselves in third person perspective. Could be various reasons. In some cultures, people usually address themselves in third person perspective because they believe that addressing themselves in first person is not good. This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person. Illeism is sometimes used in literature as a stylistic device. In real life usage, illeism can reflect a number of different stylistic intentions or involuntary circumstances. In this matter, Sparrow refers herself in third person because she needs to give the herself lofty airs, to puff herself up or illustrate her egoism.  <sep>  Q: Why does Golden Sparrow always use "she" instead of "I" or "My"? A: This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is Golden Sparrows occupation?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's a figure of speech, sometimes when people speak, they refer themselves in third person perspective. Could be various reasons. In some cultures, people usually address themselves in third person perspective because they believe that addressing themselves in first person is not good. This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person. Illeism is sometimes used in literature as a stylistic device. In real life usage, illeism can reflect a number of different stylistic intentions or involuntary circumstances. In this matter, Sparrow refers herself in third person because she needs to give the herself lofty airs, to puff herself up or illustrate her egoism.  <sep>  Q: Why does Golden Sparrow always use "she" instead of "I" or "My"? A: This incident is called Illeism (from Latin ille meaning "he, that") which is the act of referring to oneself in the third person instead of first person  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is Golden Sparrow a single lady?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer. As you said story itself is good enough to make you feel those emotions but he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger.  <sep>  Q: Why does Nolan fill his recent hits with permanent noise/music?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer. As you said story itself is good enough to make you feel those emotions but he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger.  <sep>  Q: Why does Nolan fill his recent hits with permanent noise/music? A: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would he not be able to reach us just through the story alone?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer. As you said story itself is good enough to make you feel those emotions but he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger.  <sep>  Q: Why does Nolan fill his recent hits with permanent noise/music? A: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer  Q: Why would he not be able to reach us just through the story alone? A: he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Could it not be considered intrusive?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer. As you said story itself is good enough to make you feel those emotions but he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger.  <sep>  Q: Why does Nolan fill his recent hits with permanent noise/music? A: I think it is done not because he can't reach us through the story, but because he wants to amplify the moment, emotion and feeling you get as a viewer  Q: Why would he not be able to reach us just through the story alone? A: he wants you to feel them with higher intensity so he's using that music and buzz to make those moments and feelings even stronger  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Can you tell me anything else about Dunkirk?
Output: No
CONTEXT: You are assuming that all the engineers were wiped out with David's attack. This is obviously not the case though since we know that the Engineers have been colonizing worlds and setting up bases from the movie Prometheus. Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life.  <sep>  Q: How did another Engineer ship with a chest burst and lots of facehugger eggs end up on Allen?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You are assuming that all the engineers were wiped out with David's attack. This is obviously not the case though since we know that the Engineers have been colonizing worlds and setting up bases from the movie Prometheus. Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life.  <sep>  Q: How did another Engineer ship with a chest burst and lots of facehugger eggs end up on Allen? A: Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Anything else you can share about it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You are assuming that all the engineers were wiped out with David's attack. This is obviously not the case though since we know that the Engineers have been colonizing worlds and setting up bases from the movie Prometheus. Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life.  <sep>  Q: How to explain this in Alien and Prometheus considering Alien Covenant plot?
Output: No
CONTEXT: You are assuming that all the engineers were wiped out with David's attack. This is obviously not the case though since we know that the Engineers have been colonizing worlds and setting up bases from the movie Prometheus. Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life.  <sep>  Q: How did another Engineer ship with a chest burst and lots of facehugger eggs end up on Allen? A: Further we don't even know if all the Engineers are dead on the planet in Covenant. We just know one of the cities and probably several miles around the city is barren of life  Q: Anything else you can share about it? A: You are assuming that all the engineers were wiped out with David's attack. This is obviously not the case though since we know that the Engineers have been colonizing worlds and setting up bases  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Anything else about the plot?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine. It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make sense that he would need to vent on some other physical object, namely the tree.  <sep>  Q: Why does Bill Murray's character try to chop down the tree?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine. It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make sense that he would need to vent on some other physical object, namely the tree.  <sep>  Q: Why does Bill Murray's character try to chop down the tree? A: It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he hope the tree would fall?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine. It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make sense that he would need to vent on some other physical object, namely the tree.  <sep>  Q: Why does Bill Murray's character try to chop down the tree? A: It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who are the main characters?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine. It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make sense that he would need to vent on some other physical object, namely the tree.  <sep>  Q: Why does Bill Murray's character try to chop down the tree? A: It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make  Q: Did he hope the tree would fall? A: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does he just want to destroy something?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is the story about taking risks?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film.
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the relevance of the predators?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way  Q: What is the relevance of the predators? A: You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: isn't the moral about trying everything in life?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one.  <sep>  Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes  Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way  Q: What is the relevance of the predators? A: You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one  Q: isn't the moral about trying everything in life? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else that's relevant from the film?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Jon did not commit to murdering Daenerys when he came to the Throne room. The first thing he did was lash out at her about killing innocent civilians and prisoners of war. He had been a passive partner to Daenerys these last few episodes. He lashed out in anger because he wanted Daenerys to see reason. To snap her out of the cloud of smoke to see the rubble she had laid on ground. The next thing he does is plead to her to see reason. To give mercy to Tyrion and the rest. Daenerys at this moment is now convinced that she knows what's right for the people. The last thing he does is asks her plainly as to "what about the people who think they know what's best for them". She replies that they don't have a choice. After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her. He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always. Kisses her back, embrace her in his arms and stabs her in the heart.  <sep>  Q: Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Jon did not commit to murdering Daenerys when he came to the Throne room. The first thing he did was lash out at her about killing innocent civilians and prisoners of war. He had been a passive partner to Daenerys these last few episodes. He lashed out in anger because he wanted Daenerys to see reason. To snap her out of the cloud of smoke to see the rubble she had laid on ground. The next thing he does is plead to her to see reason. To give mercy to Tyrion and the rest. Daenerys at this moment is now convinced that she knows what's right for the people. The last thing he does is asks her plainly as to "what about the people who think they know what's best for them". She replies that they don't have a choice. After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her. He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always. Kisses her back, embrace her in his arms and stabs her in the heart.  <sep>  Q: Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable? A: After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did he back stab her?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Jon did not commit to murdering Daenerys when he came to the Throne room. The first thing he did was lash out at her about killing innocent civilians and prisoners of war. He had been a passive partner to Daenerys these last few episodes. He lashed out in anger because he wanted Daenerys to see reason. To snap her out of the cloud of smoke to see the rubble she had laid on ground. The next thing he does is plead to her to see reason. To give mercy to Tyrion and the rest. Daenerys at this moment is now convinced that she knows what's right for the people. The last thing he does is asks her plainly as to "what about the people who think they know what's best for them". She replies that they don't have a choice. After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her. He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always. Kisses her back, embrace her in his arms and stabs her in the heart.  <sep>  Q: Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable? A: After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he regret it?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Jon did not commit to murdering Daenerys when he came to the Throne room. The first thing he did was lash out at her about killing innocent civilians and prisoners of war. He had been a passive partner to Daenerys these last few episodes. He lashed out in anger because he wanted Daenerys to see reason. To snap her out of the cloud of smoke to see the rubble she had laid on ground. The next thing he does is plead to her to see reason. To give mercy to Tyrion and the rest. Daenerys at this moment is now convinced that she knows what's right for the people. The last thing he does is asks her plainly as to "what about the people who think they know what's best for them". She replies that they don't have a choice. After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her. He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always. Kisses her back, embrace her in his arms and stabs her in the heart.  <sep>  Q: Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable? A: After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her  Q: Why did he back stab her? A: He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the conclusion of the movie?
Output: No