niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: He usually runs unopposed. The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned. He also survives a recall election, with no candidate in the race against him garnering the five percent necessary to force a recall  <sep>  Q: Why is Mayor Quimby still mayor? A: He usually runs unopposed  Q: Has it ever been addressed on the show? A: Sideshow Bob. Qu  Q: Why do they not address how inappropriate he is for the job on the show? A: The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do you believe he is the reason he is still mayor of Springfield?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He usually runs unopposed. The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned. He also survives a recall election, with no candidate in the race against him garnering the five percent necessary to force a recall  <sep>  Q: Why is Mayor Quimby still mayor? A: He usually runs unopposed  Q: Has it ever been addressed on the show? A: Sideshow Bob. Qu  Q: Why do they not address how inappropriate he is for the job on the show? A: The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you think it's not addressed because part of a joke around his character?
Output: No
CONTEXT: He usually runs unopposed. The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned. He also survives a recall election, with no candidate in the race against him garnering the five percent necessary to force a recall  <sep>  Q: Why is Mayor Quimby still mayor? A: He usually runs unopposed  Q: Has it ever been addressed on the show? A: Sideshow Bob. Qu  Q: Why do they not address how inappropriate he is for the job on the show? A: The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned  Q: What do you believe he is the reason he is still mayor of Springfield? A: He also survives a recall election, with no candidate in the race against him garnering the five percent necessary to force a recall  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why is five percent necessary?
Output: No
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though? A: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, for up ad coming directors, is this the type of movie to stay away from
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though? A: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described  Q: So, for up ad coming directors, is this the type of movie to stay away from A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there evidence to suggest that this type of film have relatively poor post-cinema sales?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though? A: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described  Q: So, for up ad coming directors, is this the type of movie to stay away from A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  Q: Is there evidence to suggest that this type of film have relatively poor post-cinema sales? A: People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh I see, don't you think it could spoil the enjoyment of the viewing?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I still don't understand why he would do that?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them  Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did his father get involved?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them  Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work  Q: Why did his father get involved? A: At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh, so they were involved in something illegal?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money.  <sep>  Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them  Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do you think Jess was thinking when Nicky did this?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo.  <sep>  Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo.  <sep>  Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie? A: It's not the same attack  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What attack was it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo.  <sep>  Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie? A: It's not the same attack  Q: What attack was it? A: n the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him  Q: How does Neo enter Agent Smith's code? A: Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Ok, is there anything else you could share about the movie?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo.  <sep>  Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie? A: It's not the same attack  Q: What attack was it? A: n the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him  Q: How does Neo enter Agent Smith's code? A: Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is Neo's RSI?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo.  <sep>  Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie? A: It's not the same attack  Q: What attack was it? A: n the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him  Q: How does Neo enter Agent Smith's code? A: Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix  Q: Ok, is there anything else you could share about the movie? A: This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Neo actually die or does he survive because of the side effect?
Output: No
CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2.  <sep>  Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2.  <sep>  Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist? A: I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does he exhale the mist in multiple episodes or one time only?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2.  <sep>  Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist? A: I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well  Q: Does he exhale the mist in multiple episodes or one time only? A: This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you think there is a specific reason it happened in 1 episode only?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2.  <sep>  Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist? A: I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well  Q: Does he exhale the mist in multiple episodes or one time only? A: This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes  Q: do you think there is a specific reason it happened in 1 episode only? A: unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: DO you think maybe the werewolves just have very bad breath?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2.  <sep>  Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist? A: I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well  Q: Does he exhale the mist in multiple episodes or one time only? A: This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes  Q: do you think there is a specific reason it happened in 1 episode only? A: unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2  Q: DO you think maybe the werewolves just have very bad breath? A: It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are the rest of the episodes worth watching?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out? A: Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where does he get the confident he needs to be sure he can point the beast towards the enemy, and not towards the Avengers?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out? A: Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others  Q: Where does he get the confident he needs to be sure he can point the beast towards the enemy, and not towards the Avengers? A: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you could share with me?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out? A: Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others  Q: Where does he get the confident he needs to be sure he can point the beast towards the enemy, and not towards the Avengers? A: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark  Q: Is there anything else you could share with me? A: orking together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Interesting, so he warmed up to "the other guy" and felt that he could control him around his friends?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out? A: Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others  Q: Where does he get the confident he needs to be sure he can point the beast towards the enemy, and not towards the Avengers? A: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why does Banner choose to release the Hulk?
Output: No
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first? A: In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why are movies being released this way?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first? A: In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons  Q: Why are movies being released this way? A: One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I think the films should be released in the US first as intended. What are the other reasons why?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first? A: In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons  Q: Why are movies being released this way? A: One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited  Q: I think the films should be released in the US first as intended. What are the other reasons why? A: in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what kind of rating or licensing issue cause delays?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first? A: In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons  Q: Why are movies being released this way? A: One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited  Q: I think the films should be released in the US first as intended. What are the other reasons why? A: in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay  Q: what kind of rating or licensing issue cause delays? A: n some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long does it usually take to do this before official release?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think Graves said something along the lines of "for the greater good" which is the punchline and motto of you-know-who-2. The whole speech he gave was reeking of you-know-who-2's ideology Also he attacked the ministry with quite expertise.. which ministry employee would do that? The way he interacted with Credence and how he egged on Credence to unleash his power. I'm sure with prior knowledge of the sort of person you-know-who-2 is.. it ticked off some alarm in Newt's head Or he could just be absolutely lucky.  <sep>  Q: What did graves say?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think Graves said something along the lines of "for the greater good" which is the punchline and motto of you-know-who-2. The whole speech he gave was reeking of you-know-who-2's ideology Also he attacked the ministry with quite expertise.. which ministry employee would do that? The way he interacted with Credence and how he egged on Credence to unleash his power. I'm sure with prior knowledge of the sort of person you-know-who-2 is.. it ticked off some alarm in Newt's head Or he could just be absolutely lucky.  <sep>  Q: How did Newt realize that man was not really Graves?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think Graves said something along the lines of "for the greater good" which is the punchline and motto of you-know-who-2. The whole speech he gave was reeking of you-know-who-2's ideology Also he attacked the ministry with quite expertise.. which ministry employee would do that? The way he interacted with Credence and how he egged on Credence to unleash his power. I'm sure with prior knowledge of the sort of person you-know-who-2 is.. it ticked off some alarm in Newt's head Or he could just be absolutely lucky.  <sep>  Q: What did graves say? A: I think Graves said something along the lines of "for the greater good" which is the punchline and motto of you-know-who-2. The whole speech he gave was reeking of you-know-who-2's ideology  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Graves have any help?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away? A: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are you refering to the scene at the end of the movie?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away? A: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret  Q: Are you refering to the scene at the end of the movie? A: e realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also reali  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, so why did William expose her and admitted to her that he knows?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away? A: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret  Q: Are you refering to the scene at the end of the movie? A: e realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also reali  Q: Okay, so why did William expose her and admitted to her that he knows? A: Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Interesting, so when did Ellis find out?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away? A: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret  Q: Are you refering to the scene at the end of the movie? A: e realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also reali  Q: Okay, so why did William expose her and admitted to her that he knows? A: Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests  Q: Interesting, so when did Ellis find out? A: When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, she had a problem with attachment?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret. First, she doesn't want anyone to know and second, what kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter. Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests. She was falling in love with Ellis and she knew it. When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules.  <sep>  Q: Why did Adaline run away? A: Adaline ran away from Ellis at the end for the same reason she ran away from William. She knows she doesn't age and that is her secret  Q: Are you refering to the scene at the end of the movie? A: e realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also reali  Q: Okay, so why did William expose her and admitted to her that he knows? A: Keep in mind while William did reveal that he knew it was her, Ellis still did not know. Throughout the movie it was clear that Adaline avoided personal relationships, especially love interests  Q: Interesting, so when did Ellis find out? A: When she realized who William was, she was reminded of what would happen and also realized that she was letting herself get too attached to Ellis, thus breaking her own rules  Q: So, she had a problem with attachment? A: hat kind of life would it be to watch your spouse, the person you love dearly, fade away with age while you remain static in time. She has already done that with her daughter  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I guess you have a point there, do you think it's all kind of sad?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's no canon answer I've ever heard or read. Also, don't forget that Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit, although it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside.  <sep>  Q: John receives a small puppy and the beginning and later on takes with him a stronger piitbull puppy Was this and act of symbolisim?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's no canon answer I've ever heard or read. Also, don't forget that Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit, although it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside.  <sep>  Q: John receives a small puppy and the beginning and later on takes with him a stronger piitbull puppy Was this and act of symbolisim? A: Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: After his wifes death, john receives a new puppy named Daisy. Did get the puppy to cope with his wifes death?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's no canon answer I've ever heard or read. Also, don't forget that Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit, although it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside.  <sep>  Q: Was John's new dog at the end of the movie intentionally symbolic?
Output: No
CONTEXT: There's no canon answer I've ever heard or read. Also, don't forget that Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit, although it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside.  <sep>  Q: John receives a small puppy and the beginning and later on takes with him a stronger piitbull puppy Was this and act of symbolisim? A: Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit  Q: After his wifes death, john receives a new puppy named Daisy. Did get the puppy to cope with his wifes death? A: it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did his wife Die?
Output: No
CONTEXT: There's no canon answer I've ever heard or read. Also, don't forget that Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit, although it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside.  <sep>  Q: John receives a small puppy and the beginning and later on takes with him a stronger piitbull puppy Was this and act of symbolisim? A: Wick was a hard-core hitman and killer from a very early age, so saying he was a "puppy" or "fragile" in the beginning doesn't hold a lot of merit  Q: After his wifes death, john receives a new puppy named Daisy. Did get the puppy to cope with his wifes death? A: it could be said his wife dying brought out the coldness that was always inside  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did John overcome his sadness after his wife died?
Output: No
CONTEXT: There's something else to add to the other answers : Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head, which can't be done if the mind stone is on the gauntlet (as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone). So even if resurecting someone was possible, Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones.  <sep>  Q: Thanos killed Vision in Infinity War to get the Mind Stone. During end game, hulk does "the snap" does this mean that the chracter was brought back?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's something else to add to the other answers : Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head, which can't be done if the mind stone is on the gauntlet (as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone). So even if resurecting someone was possible, Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones.  <sep>  Q: Thanos killed Vision in Infinity War to get the Mind Stone. During end game, hulk does "the snap" does this mean that the chracter was brought back? A: Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How is this possible?
Output: Yes