niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: Being choked unconscious can result in short term memory loss. It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question. Or the assault. Choking someone out doesn't knock them out for very long either. It is possible Batman drugged Dent inside the panic room and then took him home later and he woke up in his own bed.  <sep>  Q: Did Harvey Dent know that it was Bruce Wayne who locked him up? A: It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question  Q: Who did Harvey think locked him up? A: Rachel  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who actually locked Harvey up?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Being choked unconscious can result in short term memory loss. It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question. Or the assault. Choking someone out doesn't knock them out for very long either. It is possible Batman drugged Dent inside the panic room and then took him home later and he woke up in his own bed.  <sep>  Q: Did Harvey Dent know that it was Bruce Wayne who locked him up? A: It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question  Q: Who did Harvey think locked him up? A: Rachel  Q: Who actually locked Harvey up? A: Batman drugged Dent  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where did Batman drug Dent?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Being choked unconscious can result in short term memory loss. It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question. Or the assault. Choking someone out doesn't knock them out for very long either. It is possible Batman drugged Dent inside the panic room and then took him home later and he woke up in his own bed.  <sep>  Q: Did Harvey Dent know that it was Bruce Wayne who locked him up? A: It is likely that Harvey Dent may not remember Rachel asking or the question  Q: Who did Harvey think locked him up? A: Rachel  Q: Who actually locked Harvey up? A: Batman drugged Dent  Q: Where did Batman drug Dent? A: inside the panic room  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: WHen did that happen?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood. Bobby and Dean made him go through a detox in order to get all of the demon blood out of him. It looks like this happened some time in season 4 after Dean came back. However in at least one episode Sam intentially drank demon blood for one reason or another and ends up going through detox again. At the end of season 5 we see him drinking gallons of demon blood to prepare him to host Lucifer so that they can capture him.  <sep>  Q: When does Sam lose his psychic powers?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood. Bobby and Dean made him go through a detox in order to get all of the demon blood out of him. It looks like this happened some time in season 4 after Dean came back. However in at least one episode Sam intentially drank demon blood for one reason or another and ends up going through detox again. At the end of season 5 we see him drinking gallons of demon blood to prepare him to host Lucifer so that they can capture him.  <sep>  Q: When does Sam lose his psychic powers? A: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What show is this?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood. Bobby and Dean made him go through a detox in order to get all of the demon blood out of him. It looks like this happened some time in season 4 after Dean came back. However in at least one episode Sam intentially drank demon blood for one reason or another and ends up going through detox again. At the end of season 5 we see him drinking gallons of demon blood to prepare him to host Lucifer so that they can capture him.  <sep>  Q: When does Sam lose his psychic powers? A: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood  Q: What show is this? A: season 4  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who are the main characters?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood. Bobby and Dean made him go through a detox in order to get all of the demon blood out of him. It looks like this happened some time in season 4 after Dean came back. However in at least one episode Sam intentially drank demon blood for one reason or another and ends up going through detox again. At the end of season 5 we see him drinking gallons of demon blood to prepare him to host Lucifer so that they can capture him.  <sep>  Q: When does Sam lose his psychic powers? A: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood  Q: What show is this? A: season 4  Q: Who are the main characters? A: Bobby and Dean  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Which season does he lose his powers?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood. Bobby and Dean made him go through a detox in order to get all of the demon blood out of him. It looks like this happened some time in season 4 after Dean came back. However in at least one episode Sam intentially drank demon blood for one reason or another and ends up going through detox again. At the end of season 5 we see him drinking gallons of demon blood to prepare him to host Lucifer so that they can capture him.  <sep>  Q: When does Sam lose his psychic powers? A: Sam loses his powers whenever he stops drinking demon blood  Q: What show is this? A: season 4  Q: Who are the main characters? A: Bobby and Dean  Q: Which season does he lose his powers? A: season 4  Q: Was it when Sam was brought back from hell? A: after Dean came back  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he lose all of his powers?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex. Since it was a big tragedy and words travel fast, the authorities might know about it. Now, all they have to do is to search that lagoon for indominous's remnants. If you notice, they were searching through lagoon before they reached its skeleton. However, this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do.  <sep>  Q: How did they know where to locate the Indominus Rex's corpse?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex. Since it was a big tragedy and words travel fast, the authorities might know about it. Now, all they have to do is to search that lagoon for indominous's remnants. If you notice, they were searching through lagoon before they reached its skeleton. However, this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do.  <sep>  Q: How did they know where to locate the Indominus Rex's corpse? A: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did they find the other dinosaur too?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex. Since it was a big tragedy and words travel fast, the authorities might know about it. Now, all they have to do is to search that lagoon for indominous's remnants. If you notice, they were searching through lagoon before they reached its skeleton. However, this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do.  <sep>  Q: How did they know where to locate the Indominus Rex's corpse? A: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex  Q: Did they find the other dinosaur too? A: this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: was the lagoon empty after that?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex. Since it was a big tragedy and words travel fast, the authorities might know about it. Now, all they have to do is to search that lagoon for indominous's remnants. If you notice, they were searching through lagoon before they reached its skeleton. However, this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do.  <sep>  Q: How did they know where to locate the Indominus Rex's corpse? A: Owen or Claire were there when Mosauraus dragged Indominus into the lagoon. It's possible that they might have told someone what happened to I-Rex  Q: Did they find the other dinosaur too? A: this is not shown how exactly Mosauraus ate I-rex, but by looking at the skeleton, he just ate it like a lion or a tiger do  Q: was the lagoon empty after that? A: If you notice, they were searching through lagoon before they reached its skeleton  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: are Owen and Claire still together?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It is entirely possible that they tried to make a joke or word play out of "DC" in Washington DC. Or Arrowverse, specifically the Flash show, have shown the concept of Multiverse to be true. And remember, they do not mention that they are in the universe where DC comics do not exist. They seem closer to what our universe would be like if it had superheroes. Since Multiverse is vast (in Arrowverse), it is very likely that our superheroes are in one where we have DC Comics. The more likely reason may also be due to the fact that the showrunners try to be very cheeky and want to throw in as many pop culture references in the show as possible.  <sep>  Q: Are the DC comics referenced in Arrowverse?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It is entirely possible that they tried to make a joke or word play out of "DC" in Washington DC. Or Arrowverse, specifically the Flash show, have shown the concept of Multiverse to be true. And remember, they do not mention that they are in the universe where DC comics do not exist. They seem closer to what our universe would be like if it had superheroes. Since Multiverse is vast (in Arrowverse), it is very likely that our superheroes are in one where we have DC Comics. The more likely reason may also be due to the fact that the showrunners try to be very cheeky and want to throw in as many pop culture references in the show as possible.  <sep>  Q: Are the DC comics referenced in Arrowverse? A: they do not mention that they are in the universe where DC comics do not exist  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was the conversaton between Ralph and Barry about in The Flash S04E17?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations. It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus.  <sep>  Q: Why can't the soldier "get used to the new rags"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations. It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus.  <sep>  Q: Why can't the soldier "get used to the new rags"? A: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do you mean by regulations?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations. It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus.  <sep>  Q: Why can't the soldier "get used to the new rags"? A: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations  Q: What do you mean by regulations? A: It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is having a beard against regulations?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations. It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus.  <sep>  Q: Why can't the soldier "get used to the new rags"? A: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations  Q: What do you mean by regulations? A: It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The  Q: Is having a beard against regulations? A: The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would shaving be against regulations?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations. It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus.  <sep>  Q: Why can't the soldier "get used to the new rags"? A: I think the soldier says, "I can't get used to the new regs" as in regulations  Q: What do you mean by regulations? A: It's referring to Neville's (Will Smith's) beard that he has in the flashback. The  Q: Is having a beard against regulations? A: The "new regs" are likely to prohibit shaving with a razor  Q: Why would shaving be against regulations? A: prohibit shaving with a razor in order to prevent open sores that could lead to infection by the virus  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Robert Neville Successfully rescue his family?
Output: No
CONTEXT: So, we can now easily check to see if Dr. Strange said anything to Maw when he arrived and the answer is no, he doesn't ask if he's Thanos. Maw makes it clear that it is the children of Thanos that have come to take the stone. This is further clarified in the ship when Strange is held by the surgical needles. Therefore, the answer that he thought Maw was Thanos at any point in time is definitely not correct. The correct answer could be that he thought the GOTG were somehow Thanos initially, but Strange is a smart guy and none of those people are even remotely Thanos, plus Thanos had already sent Maw after him who proclaimed as mentioned above that the children of Thanos essentially do all his work for him, so he probably thought that they were WITH Thanos. This makes more sense anyway as the general conversation goes when Spidey is caught by Starlord at gunpoint; i.e. "we're the Avengers man!" Therefore, this answer is also likely not correct (although closer to correct than the top answer). The only answer I can come up with is that Strange is breaking the 4th wall, something that a master of the mystic arts could possibly do, and is referring to Cable. This would be well-within the realm of the self-deprecating humor of Deadpool and acceptable to Marvel, because they would want to maintain that Brolin was always Thanos and not Cable.  <sep>  Q: Why did Dr. Strange make the comment "You look more like a Thanos"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: So, we can now easily check to see if Dr. Strange said anything to Maw when he arrived and the answer is no, he doesn't ask if he's Thanos. Maw makes it clear that it is the children of Thanos that have come to take the stone. This is further clarified in the ship when Strange is held by the surgical needles. Therefore, the answer that he thought Maw was Thanos at any point in time is definitely not correct. The correct answer could be that he thought the GOTG were somehow Thanos initially, but Strange is a smart guy and none of those people are even remotely Thanos, plus Thanos had already sent Maw after him who proclaimed as mentioned above that the children of Thanos essentially do all his work for him, so he probably thought that they were WITH Thanos. This makes more sense anyway as the general conversation goes when Spidey is caught by Starlord at gunpoint; i.e. "we're the Avengers man!" Therefore, this answer is also likely not correct (although closer to correct than the top answer). The only answer I can come up with is that Strange is breaking the 4th wall, something that a master of the mystic arts could possibly do, and is referring to Cable. This would be well-within the realm of the self-deprecating humor of Deadpool and acceptable to Marvel, because they would want to maintain that Brolin was always Thanos and not Cable.  <sep>  Q: Why did Dr. Strange make the comment "You look more like a Thanos"? A: The correct answer could be that he thought the GOTG were somehow Thanos initially, but Strange is a smart guy and none of those people are even remotely Thanos  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Dr. Strange went ahead in time to see the possible outcomes and he must have seen Thanos in it. Is this a movie plothole?
Output: No
CONTEXT: So, we can now easily check to see if Dr. Strange said anything to Maw when he arrived and the answer is no, he doesn't ask if he's Thanos. Maw makes it clear that it is the children of Thanos that have come to take the stone. This is further clarified in the ship when Strange is held by the surgical needles. Therefore, the answer that he thought Maw was Thanos at any point in time is definitely not correct. The correct answer could be that he thought the GOTG were somehow Thanos initially, but Strange is a smart guy and none of those people are even remotely Thanos, plus Thanos had already sent Maw after him who proclaimed as mentioned above that the children of Thanos essentially do all his work for him, so he probably thought that they were WITH Thanos. This makes more sense anyway as the general conversation goes when Spidey is caught by Starlord at gunpoint; i.e. "we're the Avengers man!" Therefore, this answer is also likely not correct (although closer to correct than the top answer). The only answer I can come up with is that Strange is breaking the 4th wall, something that a master of the mystic arts could possibly do, and is referring to Cable. This would be well-within the realm of the self-deprecating humor of Deadpool and acceptable to Marvel, because they would want to maintain that Brolin was always Thanos and not Cable.  <sep>  Q: Why did Dr. Strange make the comment "You look more like a Thanos"? A: The correct answer could be that he thought the GOTG were somehow Thanos initially, but Strange is a smart guy and none of those people are even remotely Thanos  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: did he see Thanos for the first time at Titan?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think you've pretty much answered your own question. The film is based on the idea of a fictional character crossing over into the real lives of the real actors who acted in the earlier films in the franchise. That Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film.  <sep>  Q: Is the script Wes Craven is writing on his computer the movie itself?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think you've pretty much answered your own question. The film is based on the idea of a fictional character crossing over into the real lives of the real actors who acted in the earlier films in the franchise. That Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film.  <sep>  Q: Is the script Wes Craven is writing on his computer the movie itself? A: Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What can you tell me about the franchise?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think you've pretty much answered your own question. The film is based on the idea of a fictional character crossing over into the real lives of the real actors who acted in the earlier films in the franchise. That Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film.  <sep>  Q: Is the script Wes Craven is writing on his computer the movie itself? A: Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is this a little confusing to anyone else?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think you've pretty much answered your own question. The film is based on the idea of a fictional character crossing over into the real lives of the real actors who acted in the earlier films in the franchise. That Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film.  <sep>  Q: Is the script Wes Craven is writing on his computer the movie itself? A: Wes is writing the dialogue in a script that exactly matches the dialogue the characters have just said totally fits the crossover world being created in this film  Q: What can you tell me about the franchise? A: The film is based on the idea of a fictional character crossing over into the real lives of the real actors who acted in the earlier films in the franchise  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many movies were there?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality? A: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would the writer include this subplot in the book?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality? A: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book  Q: Why would the writer include this subplot in the book? A: In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did the director choose not to include this on purpose?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In episode 11 of season 1, Underwood is speaking to Vice President Jim Matthews about the possibility of Matthews running for governor of Pennsylvania (and resigning the vice presidency). Matthews protests, saying "[President] Walker needs me for 2016." This establishes that Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012.  <sep>  Q: In what year is House of Cards set?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In episode 11 of season 1, Underwood is speaking to Vice President Jim Matthews about the possibility of Matthews running for governor of Pennsylvania (and resigning the vice presidency). Matthews protests, saying "[President] Walker needs me for 2016." This establishes that Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012.  <sep>  Q: In what year is House of Cards set? A: 2012  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What year was he inaugurated in?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: In episode 11 of season 1, Underwood is speaking to Vice President Jim Matthews about the possibility of Matthews running for governor of Pennsylvania (and resigning the vice presidency). Matthews protests, saying "[President] Walker needs me for 2016." This establishes that Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012.  <sep>  Q: In what year is House of Cards set? A: 2012  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What number president was Walker?
Output: No
CONTEXT: In episode 11 of season 1, Underwood is speaking to Vice President Jim Matthews about the possibility of Matthews running for governor of Pennsylvania (and resigning the vice presidency). Matthews protests, saying "[President] Walker needs me for 2016." This establishes that Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012.  <sep>  Q: In what year is House of Cards set? A: 2012  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who was Walker the successor of?
Output: No
CONTEXT: In episode 11 of season 1, Underwood is speaking to Vice President Jim Matthews about the possibility of Matthews running for governor of Pennsylvania (and resigning the vice presidency). Matthews protests, saying "[President] Walker needs me for 2016." This establishes that Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012.  <sep>  Q: In what year is House of Cards set? A: 2012  Q: What year was he inaugurated in? A: Walker/Matthews were elected to the White House in 2012  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there any in show evidence that the first season of House of Cards really does take place in 2017?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version. Searching through Spotify, I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration. It has similar instrumentation (discounting the electric guitar) and a driving beat with flourishes leading to a grand orchestral swell. It's 3:23 minutes long, might be helpful.  <sep>  Q: Was the track "Estasi Dell Anima" newly composed for "Zombieland"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version. Searching through Spotify, I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration. It has similar instrumentation (discounting the electric guitar) and a driving beat with flourishes leading to a grand orchestral swell. It's 3:23 minutes long, might be helpful.  <sep>  Q: Was the track "Estasi Dell Anima" newly composed for "Zombieland"? A: I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: It's a great piece but too short...do you know if there is a longer rendition available?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version. Searching through Spotify, I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration. It has similar instrumentation (discounting the electric guitar) and a driving beat with flourishes leading to a grand orchestral swell. It's 3:23 minutes long, might be helpful.  <sep>  Q: Was the track "Estasi Dell Anima" newly composed for "Zombieland"? A: I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration  Q: It's a great piece but too short...do you know if there is a longer rendition available? A: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me about Estasi Dell Anima?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version. Searching through Spotify, I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration. It has similar instrumentation (discounting the electric guitar) and a driving beat with flourishes leading to a grand orchestral swell. It's 3:23 minutes long, might be helpful.  <sep>  Q: Was the track "Estasi Dell Anima" newly composed for "Zombieland"? A: I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does anyone know for sure is this piece based on a classical piece?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version. Searching through Spotify, I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration. It has similar instrumentation (discounting the electric guitar) and a driving beat with flourishes leading to a grand orchestral swell. It's 3:23 minutes long, might be helpful.  <sep>  Q: Was the track "Estasi Dell Anima" newly composed for "Zombieland"? A: I found Ennio Morricone's L'Estasi Dell'oro, which has a similar feel and might be an inspiration  Q: It's a great piece but too short...do you know if there is a longer rendition available? A: Estasi dell Anima was composed for the movie by David Sardy, there isn't a longer version  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Ugh, what other pieces has Sardy done?
Output: No
CONTEXT: This break through might look a little vague but still there was a shot in the dark for Sean and Whitey. The only connection they could make from the case was that the shot fired to kill Katie was fired using the gun of 'Just Ray'. So there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime. However the elder Harris had passed his polygraph with flying colors as mentioned by Sean. When they went to question Katie's boyfriend Brendan for the first time at his house they had met the Harris junior with his friend John O'shea too. After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder. Hence they might have taken a wild guess that mute Harris junior might have access to that gun and he was always with his friend John. Although it looks to be exaggerated but for investigative purpose they went to meet him. One more feasible explanation can be that after listening to the tape Sean and Whitey had gone to question Brendan about those two boys whom Katie might have known or have grudge against. But at the time they entered John had already drawn a gun over Brendan. Once police got them they confessed everything.  <sep>  Q: In Mystic River, How did listening to the 911 tape solve the case?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This break through might look a little vague but still there was a shot in the dark for Sean and Whitey. The only connection they could make from the case was that the shot fired to kill Katie was fired using the gun of 'Just Ray'. So there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime. However the elder Harris had passed his polygraph with flying colors as mentioned by Sean. When they went to question Katie's boyfriend Brendan for the first time at his house they had met the Harris junior with his friend John O'shea too. After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder. Hence they might have taken a wild guess that mute Harris junior might have access to that gun and he was always with his friend John. Although it looks to be exaggerated but for investigative purpose they went to meet him. One more feasible explanation can be that after listening to the tape Sean and Whitey had gone to question Brendan about those two boys whom Katie might have known or have grudge against. But at the time they entered John had already drawn a gun over Brendan. Once police got them they confessed everything.  <sep>  Q: In Mystic River, How did listening to the 911 tape solve the case? A: After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: The names weren't mentioned so how did they make the connection to the boys?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This break through might look a little vague but still there was a shot in the dark for Sean and Whitey. The only connection they could make from the case was that the shot fired to kill Katie was fired using the gun of 'Just Ray'. So there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime. However the elder Harris had passed his polygraph with flying colors as mentioned by Sean. When they went to question Katie's boyfriend Brendan for the first time at his house they had met the Harris junior with his friend John O'shea too. After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder. Hence they might have taken a wild guess that mute Harris junior might have access to that gun and he was always with his friend John. Although it looks to be exaggerated but for investigative purpose they went to meet him. One more feasible explanation can be that after listening to the tape Sean and Whitey had gone to question Brendan about those two boys whom Katie might have known or have grudge against. But at the time they entered John had already drawn a gun over Brendan. Once police got them they confessed everything.  <sep>  Q: In Mystic River, How did listening to the 911 tape solve the case? A: After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder  Q: The names weren't mentioned so how did they make the connection to the boys? A: there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did they know the victim was a girl when they only saw the car, but the body was in the back?
Output: No
CONTEXT: This break through might look a little vague but still there was a shot in the dark for Sean and Whitey. The only connection they could make from the case was that the shot fired to kill Katie was fired using the gun of 'Just Ray'. So there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime. However the elder Harris had passed his polygraph with flying colors as mentioned by Sean. When they went to question Katie's boyfriend Brendan for the first time at his house they had met the Harris junior with his friend John O'shea too. After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder. Hence they might have taken a wild guess that mute Harris junior might have access to that gun and he was always with his friend John. Although it looks to be exaggerated but for investigative purpose they went to meet him. One more feasible explanation can be that after listening to the tape Sean and Whitey had gone to question Brendan about those two boys whom Katie might have known or have grudge against. But at the time they entered John had already drawn a gun over Brendan. Once police got them they confessed everything.  <sep>  Q: In Mystic River, How did listening to the 911 tape solve the case? A: After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder  Q: The names weren't mentioned so how did they make the connection to the boys? A: there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did it take them so long to listen to the tapes?
Output: No
CONTEXT: This break through might look a little vague but still there was a shot in the dark for Sean and Whitey. The only connection they could make from the case was that the shot fired to kill Katie was fired using the gun of 'Just Ray'. So there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime. However the elder Harris had passed his polygraph with flying colors as mentioned by Sean. When they went to question Katie's boyfriend Brendan for the first time at his house they had met the Harris junior with his friend John O'shea too. After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder. Hence they might have taken a wild guess that mute Harris junior might have access to that gun and he was always with his friend John. Although it looks to be exaggerated but for investigative purpose they went to meet him. One more feasible explanation can be that after listening to the tape Sean and Whitey had gone to question Brendan about those two boys whom Katie might have known or have grudge against. But at the time they entered John had already drawn a gun over Brendan. Once police got them they confessed everything.  <sep>  Q: In Mystic River, How did listening to the 911 tape solve the case? A: After listening to the 911 tape they found out that the boys knew more about the murder  Q: The names weren't mentioned so how did they make the connection to the boys? A: there was a possibility that someone from the Harris household would have committed the crime  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did the boys ever contact the police?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth? A: Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Would this work in real life as in the movie? Or would it be too far away to communicate with Earth?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth? A: Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes  Q: Would this work in real life as in the movie? Or would it be too far away to communicate with Earth? A: If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was the Capricorn One mission objective?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth? A: Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes  Q: Would this work in real life as in the movie? Or would it be too far away to communicate with Earth? A: If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Ok, that doesn't really answer my question. How many people were onboard Capricorn One?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.)  <sep>  Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts´ wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation  Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth? A: Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes  Q: Would this work in real life as in the movie? Or would it be too far away to communicate with Earth? A: If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What year did this take place?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The answer to that question is; no one will ever know. David Lynch knew he was onto something ethereal, so he prohibited any promotional photos of the baby and forced his SE crew to sign a release saying they could never talk about it. Lynch, himself, has always been elusive at best. All anyone will ever have is speculation, until Lynch decides to spill the beans. I want to add that the idea that the baby was living tissue has 2 main roadblocks; decomposition and Rigor Mortis. It is highly unlikely the baby was actually living tissue, though it may have been modeled on such. I have seen mention that it somewhat resembles a sheep fetus, so that may have been the vision Lynch worked from. Lynch would have needed several such fetuses for multiple days of filming, which just doesn't seem plausable.  <sep>  Q: What is the Eraserhead baby?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The answer to that question is; no one will ever know. David Lynch knew he was onto something ethereal, so he prohibited any promotional photos of the baby and forced his SE crew to sign a release saying they could never talk about it. Lynch, himself, has always been elusive at best. All anyone will ever have is speculation, until Lynch decides to spill the beans. I want to add that the idea that the baby was living tissue has 2 main roadblocks; decomposition and Rigor Mortis. It is highly unlikely the baby was actually living tissue, though it may have been modeled on such. I have seen mention that it somewhat resembles a sheep fetus, so that may have been the vision Lynch worked from. Lynch would have needed several such fetuses for multiple days of filming, which just doesn't seem plausable.  <sep>  Q: What is the Eraserhead baby? A: The answer to that question is; no one will ever know  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where was the baby born?
Output: Yes