niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: Winter in the world of A Song of Ice and Fire works very differently than a real-world winter. The "seasons" are broken up into a binary system, Summer and Winter. It is implied that in the times of Winter snow creeps up as high as castle walls and the cold is unbearable. These Winters can last decades sort of like an Ice Age. These words are the motto of House Stark, presumably because of their close proximity to the Wall and the Lands of Always Winter. Currently, the shows events are taking place during a ~10yr Summer that started shortly before Brandon was born.  <sep>  Q: Is it in another galaxy? A: Currently, the shows events are taking place during a ~10yr Summer that started shortly before Brandon was born  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: 10yr summer do the seasons always last 10 years at a time?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Winter in the world of A Song of Ice and Fire works very differently than a real-world winter. The "seasons" are broken up into a binary system, Summer and Winter. It is implied that in the times of Winter snow creeps up as high as castle walls and the cold is unbearable. These Winters can last decades sort of like an Ice Age. These words are the motto of House Stark, presumably because of their close proximity to the Wall and the Lands of Always Winter. Currently, the shows events are taking place during a ~10yr Summer that started shortly before Brandon was born.  <sep>  Q: Where does this movie take place?
Output: No
CONTEXT: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real. So the ones communicating with Neo know how to do this. I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo. So I guess this was not them being cheap rather than trying to stress this 'supernatural' element of the one behind the messages.  <sep>  Q: Why wasn't Neo's monitor connected to anything?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real. So the ones communicating with Neo know how to do this. I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo. So I guess this was not them being cheap rather than trying to stress this 'supernatural' element of the one behind the messages.  <sep>  Q: Why wasn't Neo's monitor connected to anything? A: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there any symbolism involved here?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real. So the ones communicating with Neo know how to do this. I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo. So I guess this was not them being cheap rather than trying to stress this 'supernatural' element of the one behind the messages.  <sep>  Q: Why wasn't Neo's monitor connected to anything? A: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real  Q: Is there any symbolism involved here? A: I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else of importance I should know?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs! The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked. Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for! Equally, the SOE need Vatan to keep Marianne in place while they identify her handler...another reason not to shoot him.  <sep>  Q: Why S.O.E official didn't shoot Max Vatan for not allowing him to investigate Marianne?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs! The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked. Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for! Equally, the SOE need Vatan to keep Marianne in place while they identify her handler...another reason not to shoot him.  <sep>  Q: Why S.O.E official didn't shoot Max Vatan for not allowing him to investigate Marianne? A: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do they shoot people for?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs! The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked. Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for! Equally, the SOE need Vatan to keep Marianne in place while they identify her handler...another reason not to shoot him.  <sep>  Q: Why S.O.E official didn't shoot Max Vatan for not allowing him to investigate Marianne? A: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs  Q: What do they shoot people for? A: The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is he ever attacked?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So what makes them easier to close?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  Q: So what makes them easier to close? A: would close/collapse quickly after forming  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who made these portals?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  Q: So what makes them easier to close? A: would close/collapse quickly after forming  Q: Who made these portals? A: only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me about these portals?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  Q: So what makes them easier to close? A: would close/collapse quickly after forming  Q: Who made these portals? A: only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create  Q: Is there anything else you can tell me about these portals? A: Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What do the demo dogs do in stranger things?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  Q: So what makes them easier to close? A: would close/collapse quickly after forming  Q: Who made these portals? A: only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the demogorgon?
Output: No
CONTEXT: They usually got all their reading and practice material from the supply store (spell books, candles etc.). So its safe to assume they are not natural witches but acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft. I think it had more to do with the reading and practice of witchcraft and firm belief that it works.  <sep>  Q: Where do the powers come from?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: They usually got all their reading and practice material from the supply store (spell books, candles etc.). So its safe to assume they are not natural witches but acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft. I think it had more to do with the reading and practice of witchcraft and firm belief that it works.  <sep>  Q: Where do the powers come from? A: acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What kind of powers do they acquire?
Output: No
CONTEXT: They usually got all their reading and practice material from the supply store (spell books, candles etc.). So its safe to assume they are not natural witches but acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft. I think it had more to do with the reading and practice of witchcraft and firm belief that it works.  <sep>  Q: Where do the powers come from? A: acquired powers through learning and studying witchcraft  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are their power's as strong as Sarah's?
Output: No
CONTEXT: David was of great historical interest to the future A.I.s, since he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time. Beyond that, he was actually built by humans, where they are undoubtedly built by other A.I.s. Studying him would help them understand their own past. They wanted to preserve him, and although they are not organic, seem to have a morality which prevents them from simply taking him apart or locking him in a cage.  <sep>  Q: Why was David's happiness so important to the Mecha descendants?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: David was of great historical interest to the future A.I.s, since he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time. Beyond that, he was actually built by humans, where they are undoubtedly built by other A.I.s. Studying him would help them understand their own past. They wanted to preserve him, and although they are not organic, seem to have a morality which prevents them from simply taking him apart or locking him in a cage.  <sep>  Q: Why was David's happiness so important to the Mecha descendants? A: he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What movie was this event in?
Output: No
CONTEXT: David was of great historical interest to the future A.I.s, since he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time. Beyond that, he was actually built by humans, where they are undoubtedly built by other A.I.s. Studying him would help them understand their own past. They wanted to preserve him, and although they are not organic, seem to have a morality which prevents them from simply taking him apart or locking him in a cage.  <sep>  Q: Why was David's happiness so important to the Mecha descendants? A: he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many years has the Mecha been encased?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else does it add to the main storyline?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  Q: What else does it add to the main storyline? A: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do they cover parts of the main storyline too or is it all new plot content?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  Q: What else does it add to the main storyline? A: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions  Q: Do they cover parts of the main storyline too or is it all new plot content? A: There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Ok so can you tell me anything else about the animatrix?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  Q: What else does it add to the main storyline? A: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions  Q: Do they cover parts of the main storyline too or is it all new plot content? A: There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films  Q: Ok so can you tell me anything else about the animatrix? A: Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Ok great. Any final comments to make make?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  Q: What else does it add to the main storyline? A: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions  Q: Do they cover parts of the main storyline too or is it all new plot content? A: There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films  Q: Ok so can you tell me anything else about the animatrix? A: Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion  Q: Ok great. Any final comments to make make? A: The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: That's interesting. Who is the kid?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  Q: What else does it add to the main storyline? A: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions  Q: Do they cover parts of the main storyline too or is it all new plot content? A: There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films  Q: Ok so can you tell me anything else about the animatrix? A: Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion  Q: Ok great. Any final comments to make make? A: The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Can you tell me anything else about any other characters?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Fitts have a gun?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter  Q: Does Fitts have a gun? A: Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did he shoot him?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter  Q: Does Fitts have a gun? A: Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier  Q: Why did he shoot him? A: Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why was that a problem?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter  Q: Does Fitts have a gun? A: Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier  Q: Why did he shoot him? A: Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover  Q: Why was that a problem? A: You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Were they actually lovers?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: By this point in the narrative, Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire. The affair with the bullets missing him in Marvin's apartment had convinced him that God had a higher purpose for him, and by allowing Ringo to take what he needed, Jules was ensuring that he wouldn't have to kill him for attempting to rob him. This was the first step towards Jules' new life. He was not only buying/saving Ringo's life, but also his own.  <sep>  Q: What should I know about the scene?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: By this point in the narrative, Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire. The affair with the bullets missing him in Marvin's apartment had convinced him that God had a higher purpose for him, and by allowing Ringo to take what he needed, Jules was ensuring that he wouldn't have to kill him for attempting to rob him. This was the first step towards Jules' new life. He was not only buying/saving Ringo's life, but also his own.  <sep>  Q: What should I know about the scene? A: Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did he want to change his life?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: By this point in the narrative, Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire. The affair with the bullets missing him in Marvin's apartment had convinced him that God had a higher purpose for him, and by allowing Ringo to take what he needed, Jules was ensuring that he wouldn't have to kill him for attempting to rob him. This was the first step towards Jules' new life. He was not only buying/saving Ringo's life, but also his own.  <sep>  Q: Why did Jules have to give Ringo $1,500?
Output: No
CONTEXT: By this point in the narrative, Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire. The affair with the bullets missing him in Marvin's apartment had convinced him that God had a higher purpose for him, and by allowing Ringo to take what he needed, Jules was ensuring that he wouldn't have to kill him for attempting to rob him. This was the first step towards Jules' new life. He was not only buying/saving Ringo's life, but also his own.  <sep>  Q: What should I know about the scene? A: Jules had already decided that he was going to change his life - he no longer wanted to be a killer for hire  Q: Why did he want to change his life? A: The affair with the bullets missing him in Marvin's apartment had convinced him that God had a higher purpose for him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What did he think his higher purpose was?
Output: No
CONTEXT: We're not given an on-screen explanation. That said, the 80s is closer to the era when Morse code was somewhat relevant. As mentioned in comments, knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license. We know the are interested in the radio, and AV club in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary. Some radios also used to include Morse code charts on the front; so Will could have memory from those as well.  <sep>  Q: Why does Will know Morse code?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We're not given an on-screen explanation. That said, the 80s is closer to the era when Morse code was somewhat relevant. As mentioned in comments, knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license. We know the are interested in the radio, and AV club in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary. Some radios also used to include Morse code charts on the front; so Will could have memory from those as well.  <sep>  Q: Why does Will know Morse code? A: We're not given an on-screen explanation  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How do Hopper and Eleven know it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We're not given an on-screen explanation. That said, the 80s is closer to the era when Morse code was somewhat relevant. As mentioned in comments, knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license. We know the are interested in the radio, and AV club in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary. Some radios also used to include Morse code charts on the front; so Will could have memory from those as well.  <sep>  Q: Why does Will know Morse code? A: We're not given an on-screen explanation  Q: How do Hopper and Eleven know it? A: knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What can you tell me about ham radio?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: We're not given an on-screen explanation. That said, the 80s is closer to the era when Morse code was somewhat relevant. As mentioned in comments, knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license. We know the are interested in the radio, and AV club in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary. Some radios also used to include Morse code charts on the front; so Will could have memory from those as well.  <sep>  Q: Why does Will know Morse code? A: We're not given an on-screen explanation  Q: How do Hopper and Eleven know it? A: knowing Morse code was a requirement for a ham radio license  Q: What can you tell me about ham radio? A: We know the are interested in the radio, and AV club in general, so this isn't out of the ordinary  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the cause of the riot?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies  Q: What is the cause of the riot? A: They both share common interest  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why are their thoughts simple and intriguing?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies  Q: What is the cause of the riot? A: They both share common interest  Q: Why are their thoughts simple and intriguing? A: they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why is the movie called "The Dreamers"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies  Q: What is the cause of the riot? A: They both share common interest  Q: Why are their thoughts simple and intriguing? A: they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies  Q: Why is the movie called "The Dreamers"? A: in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is this a romantic movie?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Théo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies.  <sep>  Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies  Q: What is the cause of the riot? A: They both share common interest  Q: Why are their thoughts simple and intriguing? A: they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies  Q: Why is the movie called "The Dreamers"? A: in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting  Q: Is this a romantic movie? A: from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does this movie take place in the United States?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From reading the article that @Richard has linked in the comments, it is clear that there certainly is a subtext of a homoerotic nature between the two characters Mr. Orange and Mr. White. That's almost indisputable. However I never interpreted it that way when I watched it, I just assumed it was simply the building of a mutual respect, and a mentor/mentee relationship. However, as the article goes on to say that their relationship is similar to “wakashudo”, and knowing Tarantino's affinity with samurai culture (which he made 2 films about) it is very possible that this is the relationship dynamic he intended to portray. Of course, like most movies, it is open to interpretation. Therefore whilst the subtext is certainly there, and it was almost certainly intended that way by the writer/director, it is also subtle enough so that it doesn't necessarily force the audience to interpret the movie that way.  <sep>  Q: Relationship between “Mr. Orange” and “Mr. White” in "Reservoir Dogs"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From reading the article that @Richard has linked in the comments, it is clear that there certainly is a subtext of a homoerotic nature between the two characters Mr. Orange and Mr. White. That's almost indisputable. However I never interpreted it that way when I watched it, I just assumed it was simply the building of a mutual respect, and a mentor/mentee relationship. However, as the article goes on to say that their relationship is similar to “wakashudo”, and knowing Tarantino's affinity with samurai culture (which he made 2 films about) it is very possible that this is the relationship dynamic he intended to portray. Of course, like most movies, it is open to interpretation. Therefore whilst the subtext is certainly there, and it was almost certainly intended that way by the writer/director, it is also subtle enough so that it doesn't necessarily force the audience to interpret the movie that way.  <sep>  Q: Relationship between “Mr. Orange” and “Mr. White” in "Reservoir Dogs"? A: it is clear that there certainly is a subtext of a homoerotic nature between the two characters Mr. Orange and Mr. White  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who says "Gay subtext always makes movies better?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From reading the article that @Richard has linked in the comments, it is clear that there certainly is a subtext of a homoerotic nature between the two characters Mr. Orange and Mr. White. That's almost indisputable. However I never interpreted it that way when I watched it, I just assumed it was simply the building of a mutual respect, and a mentor/mentee relationship. However, as the article goes on to say that their relationship is similar to “wakashudo”, and knowing Tarantino's affinity with samurai culture (which he made 2 films about) it is very possible that this is the relationship dynamic he intended to portray. Of course, like most movies, it is open to interpretation. Therefore whilst the subtext is certainly there, and it was almost certainly intended that way by the writer/director, it is also subtle enough so that it doesn't necessarily force the audience to interpret the movie that way.  <sep>  Q: Relationship between “Mr. Orange” and “Mr. White” in "Reservoir Dogs"? A: it is clear that there certainly is a subtext of a homoerotic nature between the two characters Mr. Orange and Mr. White  Q: Who says "Gay subtext always makes movies better? A: he subtext is certainly there, and it was almost certainly intended that way by the writer/director, it is also subtle  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long did they know each other when Mr. Orange was shot?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Because characters from different games can and do significantly interact with each other routinely. This is so common that there is Game Central Station – a place where characters quickly “commute” between games. They have inter-game therapy sessions with each other: We also see the ability of game characters to change the original game code of a game. Game characters can permanently move to another game: Turbo/King Candy did so when he left his original game to take up residence in Sugar Rush. On the whole, Wreck-It Ralph is a world where almost anything is possible with games.  <sep>  Q: How does Sugar Rush understand outside weapons?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because characters from different games can and do significantly interact with each other routinely. This is so common that there is Game Central Station – a place where characters quickly “commute” between games. They have inter-game therapy sessions with each other: We also see the ability of game characters to change the original game code of a game. Game characters can permanently move to another game: Turbo/King Candy did so when he left his original game to take up residence in Sugar Rush. On the whole, Wreck-It Ralph is a world where almost anything is possible with games.  <sep>  Q: How does Sugar Rush understand outside weapons? A: Because characters from different games can and do significantly interact with each other routinely  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How does she use them outside her own game?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because characters from different games can and do significantly interact with each other routinely. This is so common that there is Game Central Station – a place where characters quickly “commute” between games. They have inter-game therapy sessions with each other: We also see the ability of game characters to change the original game code of a game. Game characters can permanently move to another game: Turbo/King Candy did so when he left his original game to take up residence in Sugar Rush. On the whole, Wreck-It Ralph is a world where almost anything is possible with games.  <sep>  Q: How does Sugar Rush understand outside weapons? A: Because characters from different games can and do significantly interact with each other routinely  Q: How does she use them outside her own game? A: there is Game Central Station – a place where characters quickly “commute” between games  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do they weapons function normally in different games?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually. I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of, making the translation very rudimentary and child-like. Or possibly, if there was not a robust movie industry in that nation in the early 1980s, the quality of the output was considered pretty poor. Or some combination of the two. So, languages that were pretty common in the "western" and US part of the world would not work, even if the country was not really familiar (where the language was Spanish, French, German or Italian) or if there were not examples of any movies from a country. Portuguese? Maybe, but a Slavic or Balkan nation or language would be ideal for that line. Probably not Poland, because there was already a Polish stereotype about intelligence that was commonly used in jokes, so there might be some confusion about intent. "Czech" was merely chosen because it's a country an English speaking audience would be aware of, but there would be almost no movies, as of that time, that anyone could reference, making it an obscure scenario. They could have easily used Romania, Bulgaria, but could not use Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, etc (nations that were, at that time, considered part of the USSR).  <sep>  Q: What's wrong with subtitles for a Czech movie, as referenced in Tootsie? A: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually  Q: Why does Julie say my lines sound like subtitles for a Czech movie? A: I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there something characteristic about the...like bad grammar?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually. I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of, making the translation very rudimentary and child-like. Or possibly, if there was not a robust movie industry in that nation in the early 1980s, the quality of the output was considered pretty poor. Or some combination of the two. So, languages that were pretty common in the "western" and US part of the world would not work, even if the country was not really familiar (where the language was Spanish, French, German or Italian) or if there were not examples of any movies from a country. Portuguese? Maybe, but a Slavic or Balkan nation or language would be ideal for that line. Probably not Poland, because there was already a Polish stereotype about intelligence that was commonly used in jokes, so there might be some confusion about intent. "Czech" was merely chosen because it's a country an English speaking audience would be aware of, but there would be almost no movies, as of that time, that anyone could reference, making it an obscure scenario. They could have easily used Romania, Bulgaria, but could not use Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, etc (nations that were, at that time, considered part of the USSR).  <sep>  Q: What's wrong with subtitles for a Czech movie, as referenced in Tootsie? A: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually  Q: Why does Julie say my lines sound like subtitles for a Czech movie? A: I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Well, I live in the Czech Republic and was wondering what do our subtitles look like in the US?
Output: No