niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: To get rid of Jesse. It's my speculation, I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt. But he can create a situation where he can get killed on his own. So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self. It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day.  <sep>  Q: Why did Tomas have to die? A: To get rid of Jesse  Q: Was his method successful? A: I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the conclusion of the episode?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: To get rid of Jesse. It's my speculation, I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt. But he can create a situation where he can get killed on his own. So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self. It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day.  <sep>  Q: Why did Tomas have to die? A: To get rid of Jesse  Q: Was his method successful? A: I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt  Q: What is the conclusion of the episode? A: It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who's plan was it to kill Tomas?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: To get rid of Jesse. It's my speculation, I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt. But he can create a situation where he can get killed on his own. So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self. It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day.  <sep>  Q: Why did Tomas have to die? A: To get rid of Jesse  Q: Was his method successful? A: I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt  Q: What is the conclusion of the episode? A: It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day  Q: Who's plan was it to kill Tomas? A: So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are there any plot twists?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: To get rid of Jesse. It's my speculation, I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt. But he can create a situation where he can get killed on his own. So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self. It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day.  <sep>  Q: Why did Tomas have to die? A: To get rid of Jesse  Q: Was his method successful? A: I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt  Q: What is the conclusion of the episode? A: It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who are the main actors?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Because Wahyu was corrupt and Dagu and Rama figured it out during the raid (the guy in the apartment complex told Rama that Wahyu had been in the building many times before which he would only have known if he was in league with the criminals and Wahyu knew where Tama's office was). Jaka even told him he would go to jail as he had led an unsanctioned and highly dangerous mission and no one else knew about it. They were originally working together as that was the only way they could escape alive (by seizing Tama and using him as a hostage) once Wahyu had Tama as a bargaining chip he realised that he didn't need Dagu and Rama anymore and their knowledge of his corrupt actions would lead to him being incarcarated.  <sep>  Q: Near the end of the Raid, Wahyu and Dagu reach the boss,Why does Wahyu kill Dagu?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because Wahyu was corrupt and Dagu and Rama figured it out during the raid (the guy in the apartment complex told Rama that Wahyu had been in the building many times before which he would only have known if he was in league with the criminals and Wahyu knew where Tama's office was). Jaka even told him he would go to jail as he had led an unsanctioned and highly dangerous mission and no one else knew about it. They were originally working together as that was the only way they could escape alive (by seizing Tama and using him as a hostage) once Wahyu had Tama as a bargaining chip he realised that he didn't need Dagu and Rama anymore and their knowledge of his corrupt actions would lead to him being incarcarated.  <sep>  Q: Near the end of the Raid, Wahyu and Dagu reach the boss,Why does Wahyu kill Dagu? A: Because Wahyu was corrupt and Dagu and Rama figured it out during the raid  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: But he is not on the boss's side so why kill his comrade?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because Wahyu was corrupt and Dagu and Rama figured it out during the raid (the guy in the apartment complex told Rama that Wahyu had been in the building many times before which he would only have known if he was in league with the criminals and Wahyu knew where Tama's office was). Jaka even told him he would go to jail as he had led an unsanctioned and highly dangerous mission and no one else knew about it. They were originally working together as that was the only way they could escape alive (by seizing Tama and using him as a hostage) once Wahyu had Tama as a bargaining chip he realised that he didn't need Dagu and Rama anymore and their knowledge of his corrupt actions would lead to him being incarcarated.  <sep>  Q: Near the end of the Raid, Wahyu and Dagu reach the boss,Why does Wahyu kill Dagu? A: Because Wahyu was corrupt and Dagu and Rama figured it out during the raid  Q: But he is not on the boss's side so why kill his comrade? A: once Wahyu had Tama as a bargaining chip he realised that he didn't need Dagu and Rama anymore and their knowledge of his corrupt actions would lead to him being incarcarated  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Hmmm. May be I missed that
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it's intentionally left ambiguous whether it was an accident or it was done on purpose. Even in the short story that this incident is based on, My old man and the lascivious special award that heralded the birth of pop art, it's never stated outright if breaking the lamp was intentional. Of course, in both the story and the movie the Mother is glad to see it go, and the Old Man accuses her of breaking it on purpose, but I don't think there's a definite answer.  <sep>  Q: Did the Mother break the Leg Lamp?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it's intentionally left ambiguous whether it was an accident or it was done on purpose. Even in the short story that this incident is based on, My old man and the lascivious special award that heralded the birth of pop art, it's never stated outright if breaking the lamp was intentional. Of course, in both the story and the movie the Mother is glad to see it go, and the Old Man accuses her of breaking it on purpose, but I don't think there's a definite answer.  <sep>  Q: Did the Mother break the Leg Lamp? A: in both the story and the movie the Mother is glad to see it go, and the Old Man accuses her of breaking it on purpose, but I don't think there's a definite answer  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did she ever like it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it's intentionally left ambiguous whether it was an accident or it was done on purpose. Even in the short story that this incident is based on, My old man and the lascivious special award that heralded the birth of pop art, it's never stated outright if breaking the lamp was intentional. Of course, in both the story and the movie the Mother is glad to see it go, and the Old Man accuses her of breaking it on purpose, but I don't think there's a definite answer.  <sep>  Q: Did the Mother break the Leg Lamp? A: in both the story and the movie the Mother is glad to see it go, and the Old Man accuses her of breaking it on purpose, but I don't think there's a definite answer  Q: Did she ever like it? A: Mother is glad to see it go  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does she seem happy that is broken?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did he not want a promotion?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  Q: Why did he not want a promotion? A: Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Kurtz want to stay in the fight rather than get a higher rank?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  Q: Why did he not want a promotion? A: Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines  Q: Did Kurtz want to stay in the fight rather than get a higher rank? A: He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was he offered as a promotion?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  Q: Why did he not want a promotion? A: Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines  Q: Did Kurtz want to stay in the fight rather than get a higher rank? A: He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight  Q: What was he offered as a promotion? A: He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he want to make a particular choice due to his age?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the key is the line "He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead." Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines. He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight -- so Kurtz requested Airborne training as a first step toward returning to combat. Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training. Promotion would have required continuing to follow an advancing career path -- whereas Kurtz brought his career advancement to a halt by enrolling in Airborne training.  <sep>  Q: What was the significance of Kurtz joining airborne A: Kurtz took himself out of the running for promotion by enrolling in Airborne training  Q: Why did he not want a promotion? A: Kurtz had apparently lost interest in climbing higher in the military ranks, which presumably would have taken him away from combat and the front lines  Q: Did Kurtz want to stay in the fight rather than get a higher rank? A: He seemed to want to go in the opposite direction -- toward the heat of the fight  Q: What was he offered as a promotion? A: He could've gone for general, but he went for himself instead  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Kurtz regret his decision in the end?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there any difference in these episodes?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  Q: Is there any difference in these episodes? A: Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Have they been remastered or anything like that?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  Q: Is there any difference in these episodes? A: Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA  Q: Have they been remastered or anything like that? A: The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is this just a choice that Amazon streaming has decided to use?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  Q: Is there any difference in these episodes? A: Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA  Q: Have they been remastered or anything like that? A: The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from  Q: Is this just a choice that Amazon streaming has decided to use? A: Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, so they wouldn't just be able to change it at random?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS). Episodes for "Batman: The Animated Series" have been broadcast and distributed under both BTAS and TNBSA titles. Other TNBSA episodes are sourced from "Superman: The Animated Series" and "The New Batman Adventures"; the final 24 episodes of BTAS, which used the animation style of the Superman show. Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA. The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from. Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening. Since streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream, assuming your provider has access to both releases, I do not believe there is a way you can control whether the source of your BTAS episode is BTAS or TNBSA.  <sep>  Q: Why do some of the Batman: Animated Series episodes feature the Batman-Superman opening? A: The opening title sequence with Superman is from "The New Batman/Superman Adventures" (TNBSA), and the classic Batman opening is from "Batman: The Animated Series" (BTAS  Q: Is there any difference in these episodes? A: Except for the opening title sequence, there is no observable difference between BTAS episodes sourced from either BTAS or TNBSA  Q: Have they been remastered or anything like that? A: The opening sequence used for your video stream depends on the release the episode was sourced from  Q: Is this just a choice that Amazon streaming has decided to use? A: Streaming companies (Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc.) license different video releases. If Amazon sourced a particular BTAS episode from a TNBSA release, then you will see the TNBSA opening  Q: Okay, so they wouldn't just be able to change it at random? A: streaming providers usually provide only a single access point to a given video stream  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Any other helpful information you might have about these animated series episodes?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi? A: Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Didn't he say that the force was strong with her as well?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi? A: Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage  Q: Didn't he say that the force was strong with her as well? A: I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why is it not as strong with her?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi? A: Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage  Q: Didn't he say that the force was strong with her as well? A: I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke  Q: Why is it not as strong with her? A: Vader has her in captivity, even tortures he  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there an importance to it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Luke had discovered that his father was a Jedi and that he had some skill with the force from his time with Obi-Wan. He was advised by Ghost Obi-Wan to seek out Yoda to further his training. So he seeks out Yoda for training. Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage, had not experimented with any Force training and had no time with Obi-Wan at all. She does not even really understand the Force, never mind seeking out a master for her training. I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke. Vader has her in captivity, even tortures her and doesn't seem to sense her latent abilities. Luke, despite very brief training on the flight to Alderaan, is quickly identified by Vader as being strong, even when he is just another pilot in the battle over the Death Star. I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed, and that to keep her parentage secret from her, Vader and the Emperor was the best way to keep her safe.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Yoda train Princess Leia as a Jedi? A: Leia on the other hand does not know of her parentage  Q: Didn't he say that the force was strong with her as well? A: I think it is also clear that Leia is not as inherently strong with the force as Luke  Q: Why is it not as strong with her? A: Vader has her in captivity, even tortures he  Q: Is there an importance to it? A: I think Yoda and Obi-Wan view Leia as a backup, to be used if Luke failed  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, they will use her as backup but she isn't good enough otherwise?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet. However, in the novel Jack's father is Old Nick - the man who was holding Ma and Jack captive. Ma's father would not look at Jack because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger, etc at the the kidnapping of his daughter.  <sep>  Q: In the film Room, why was the Grandfather Unable to Look at Grandson?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet. However, in the novel Jack's father is Old Nick - the man who was holding Ma and Jack captive. Ma's father would not look at Jack because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger, etc at the the kidnapping of his daughter.  <sep>  Q: In the film Room, why was the Grandfather Unable to Look at Grandson? A: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: DId the grandfather make eye contact with the son?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet. However, in the novel Jack's father is Old Nick - the man who was holding Ma and Jack captive. Ma's father would not look at Jack because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger, etc at the the kidnapping of his daughter.  <sep>  Q: In the film Room, why was the Grandfather Unable to Look at Grandson? A: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet  Q: DId the grandfather make eye contact with the son? A: Ma's father would not look at Jack  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why not?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet. However, in the novel Jack's father is Old Nick - the man who was holding Ma and Jack captive. Ma's father would not look at Jack because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger, etc at the the kidnapping of his daughter.  <sep>  Q: In the film Room, why was the Grandfather Unable to Look at Grandson? A: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet  Q: DId the grandfather make eye contact with the son? A: Ma's father would not look at Jack  Q: Why not? A: because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who is old nick?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet. However, in the novel Jack's father is Old Nick - the man who was holding Ma and Jack captive. Ma's father would not look at Jack because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger, etc at the the kidnapping of his daughter.  <sep>  Q: In the film Room, why was the Grandfather Unable to Look at Grandson? A: I will preface this by saying that I haven't seen the film yet  Q: DId the grandfather make eye contact with the son? A: Ma's father would not look at Jack  Q: Why not? A: because doing so would make the father think of Old Nick - thus leading to anger  Q: Who is old nick? A: Jack's father is Old Nick  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why does he get angry about him?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: No password on the computer account, and the professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack. Many people do not require a password to enter their computer and many people save passwords to their browser. Note that the "stay signed in" checkbox for gmail was checked. Most people give little thought to security on their computer.  <sep>  Q: How was she able to crack the password of her professor's mail?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: No password on the computer account, and the professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack. Many people do not require a password to enter their computer and many people save passwords to their browser. Note that the "stay signed in" checkbox for gmail was checked. Most people give little thought to security on their computer.  <sep>  Q: How was she able to crack the password of her professor's mail? A: No password on the computer account  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would there not have been a password?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: No password on the computer account, and the professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack. Many people do not require a password to enter their computer and many people save passwords to their browser. Note that the "stay signed in" checkbox for gmail was checked. Most people give little thought to security on their computer.  <sep>  Q: How was she able to crack the password of her professor's mail? A: No password on the computer account  Q: Why would there not have been a password? A: he professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is this not very unwise?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: No password on the computer account, and the professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack. Many people do not require a password to enter their computer and many people save passwords to their browser. Note that the "stay signed in" checkbox for gmail was checked. Most people give little thought to security on their computer.  <sep>  Q: How was she able to crack the password of her professor's mail? A: No password on the computer account  Q: Why would there not have been a password? A: he professor saved his password in Safari, so there was nothing to crack/hack  Q: Is this not very unwise? A: Many people do not require a password to enter their computer and many people save passwords to their browser  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What can you tell me about the movie in general?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Interesting question. But I'd rather say they were just very useful tools, if they hadn't used them the way they did, they surely would have found other uses for them. More than being tailored for their specific futures they were probably chosen more to fit their individual characters, so I'd say she rather sensed they might be especially useful or fitting for the specific recipients. (But this is all rather speculation because despite having read the corresponding books I'm not completely sure.)  <sep>  Q: What is his mirror used for?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix? A: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: If this is the case then why did he want it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix? A: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry  Q: If this is the case then why did he want it? A: He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said  Q: When he found out what it said was it useful? A: He didn't know that it wouldn't help him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix? A: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry  Q: If this is the case then why did he want it? A: He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said  Q: When he found out what it said was it useful? A: He didn't know that it wouldn't help him  Q: What else can you tell me about it? A: Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: It seems to me that seeking out this prophecy was not a wise thing to do, why did he do it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry. What he did know was that he had been defeated by a baby, who was the likely subject of the prophecy (Neville Longbottom being the other potential subject). He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said, in case it held any information that would have helped him. He was aware he had only heard part of the details, and given the "defeat" by Baby-Harry, was keen to know the rest in case it gave him a clue how to avoid a repeat of that outcome. He didn't know that it wouldn't help him; and Dumbledore quite possibly thought it worth keeping secret to try and force Voldemort to reveal himself to the public when he tried to get hold of it.  <sep>  Q: Why did Voldemort want the prophecy in Order of the Phoenix? A: Voldemort didn't know that it held no useful information to defeat Harry  Q: If this is the case then why did he want it? A: He wanted the prophecy so that he could know fully what it said  Q: When he found out what it said was it useful? A: He didn't know that it wouldn't help him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why was it not helpful to him in any way?
Output: No
CONTEXT: You've misunderstood what's happening. The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels. This is to allow the combat to be fair. If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight. As it was, Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength.  <sep>  Q: How does Killmonger so easily defeat T'Challa in ritual combat?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You've misunderstood what's happening. The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels. This is to allow the combat to be fair. If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight. As it was, Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength.  <sep>  Q: How does Killmonger so easily defeat T'Challa in ritual combat? A: Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How can a regular human soldier so easily overpower a hero with superhuman strength?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You've misunderstood what's happening. The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels. This is to allow the combat to be fair. If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight. As it was, Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength.  <sep>  Q: How does Killmonger so easily defeat T'Challa in ritual combat? A: Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength  Q: How can a regular human soldier so easily overpower a hero with superhuman strength? A: The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, the potion didn't give him the same powers as the Black Panther?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You've misunderstood what's happening. The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels. This is to allow the combat to be fair. If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight. As it was, Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength.  <sep>  Q: How does Killmonger so easily defeat T'Challa in ritual combat? A: Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength  Q: How can a regular human soldier so easily overpower a hero with superhuman strength? A: The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels  Q: So, the potion didn't give him the same powers as the Black Panther? A: If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you have any idea what was in that special potion?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: You've misunderstood what's happening. The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels. This is to allow the combat to be fair. If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight. As it was, Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength.  <sep>  Q: How does Killmonger so easily defeat T'Challa in ritual combat? A: Killmonger won due to what appeared to be purely superior skill and strength  Q: How can a regular human soldier so easily overpower a hero with superhuman strength? A: The potion T'Challa drinks strips him of the Black Panther powers and reverts him to normal human levels  Q: So, the potion didn't give him the same powers as the Black Panther? A: If T'Challa had the Black Panther powers odds are good that he'd have won the fight  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me about superhuman strength, agility and resilience?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The bleach is for Trevor to clean his apartment with. Because he cannot sleep, I can only assume he turned his mind to something to keep him distracted; hence over-cleaning his apartment. He probably did not notice the blood as because the fish were from the trip that we can assume he was coming home from when he killed 'Nicholas'. He probably was so shocked from this crime that he shoved the fish into the freezer and forgot about them as his mind began to shut down over the course of the next year. I don't believe it is explicitly shown that this has occurred during the whole year, but at the very end when Trevor is trying to find Ivan, when he stops caring about his apartment due to his manhunt is when this occurs.  <sep>  Q: What is wrong with the bleach and the fish in the Machinist?
Output: Yes