niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: As noted in the comments, as seen during the events of Captain America, Winter Soldier, Hydra had infiltrated every level of SHIELD by the 2010s. We know that SHIELD was already doing alien weapon research (The Destroyer weapon that Coulson used) and Hydra Tesseract weapon research (Hydra guns Cap found on the helicarrier). They even "converted" Hydra scientists, like Arnim Zola, whom in turn decided to poison SHIELD from the inside. By 2010s, Hydra agents were everywhere, from low level rank and file, special agents (Jasper Sitwell), elite soldiers (STRIKE team leader Brock Rumlow), the World Security Council (Alexander Pierce), and even senators (Senator Stern, the prick from Iron Man). These two factors combined, would have meant SHIELD either intentionally set up to study the Leviathan for further benefit, or Hydra intercepted it, as they did the Scepter in the Winter Soldier stinger. It's highly likely that the Hydra base was a black site bankrolled by SHIELD until it collapsed.  <sep>  Q: How do HYDRA get the Leviathan to Strucker's base? A: By 2010s, Hydra agents were everywhere, from low level rank and file, special agents  Q: how did they get the corpse past shield? A: It's highly likely that the Hydra base was a black site bankrolled by SHIELD until it collapsed  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: why did they want a corpse?
Output: No
CONTEXT: As noted in the comments, as seen during the events of Captain America, Winter Soldier, Hydra had infiltrated every level of SHIELD by the 2010s. We know that SHIELD was already doing alien weapon research (The Destroyer weapon that Coulson used) and Hydra Tesseract weapon research (Hydra guns Cap found on the helicarrier). They even "converted" Hydra scientists, like Arnim Zola, whom in turn decided to poison SHIELD from the inside. By 2010s, Hydra agents were everywhere, from low level rank and file, special agents (Jasper Sitwell), elite soldiers (STRIKE team leader Brock Rumlow), the World Security Council (Alexander Pierce), and even senators (Senator Stern, the prick from Iron Man). These two factors combined, would have meant SHIELD either intentionally set up to study the Leviathan for further benefit, or Hydra intercepted it, as they did the Scepter in the Winter Soldier stinger. It's highly likely that the Hydra base was a black site bankrolled by SHIELD until it collapsed.  <sep>  Q: How do HYDRA get the Leviathan to Strucker's base? A: By 2010s, Hydra agents were everywhere, from low level rank and file, special agents  Q: how did they get the corpse past shield? A: It's highly likely that the Hydra base was a black site bankrolled by SHIELD until it collapsed  Q: why would shield bankroll them? A: would have meant SHIELD either intentionally set up to study the Leviathan for further benefit, or Hydra intercepted it, as they did the Scepter in the Winter Soldier stinger  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what power does a leviathan have?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie. We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him...let's assume they do... I don't remember where I heard this but there's a scene that's not in the movie. The second side of the head piece contains more info than just the 'correct' staff length. Also written on the back side are instructions not to look into the Ark...this is how Indy knows to 'KEEP YOUR EYES SHUT' when the Ark is opened. Indy learns this when he and Sallah have the head piece translated...don't know why this was left out of the movie...bad dates, maybe. Anyway, without Indy, either a) they never find the ark because they don't get the head piece without him, or b) they obtain the ark with the complete head piece but aren't killed by it because they have the instructions not to look at it. Sorry, Amy.  <sep>  Q: Is Amy right about Indiana Jones being irrelevant to the outcome?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie. We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him...let's assume they do... I don't remember where I heard this but there's a scene that's not in the movie. The second side of the head piece contains more info than just the 'correct' staff length. Also written on the back side are instructions not to look into the Ark...this is how Indy knows to 'KEEP YOUR EYES SHUT' when the Ark is opened. Indy learns this when he and Sallah have the head piece translated...don't know why this was left out of the movie...bad dates, maybe. Anyway, without Indy, either a) they never find the ark because they don't get the head piece without him, or b) they obtain the ark with the complete head piece but aren't killed by it because they have the instructions not to look at it. Sorry, Amy.  <sep>  Q: Is Amy right about Indiana Jones being irrelevant to the outcome? A: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why isn't Amy right though? Even Sheldon accepts that she is
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie. We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him...let's assume they do... I don't remember where I heard this but there's a scene that's not in the movie. The second side of the head piece contains more info than just the 'correct' staff length. Also written on the back side are instructions not to look into the Ark...this is how Indy knows to 'KEEP YOUR EYES SHUT' when the Ark is opened. Indy learns this when he and Sallah have the head piece translated...don't know why this was left out of the movie...bad dates, maybe. Anyway, without Indy, either a) they never find the ark because they don't get the head piece without him, or b) they obtain the ark with the complete head piece but aren't killed by it because they have the instructions not to look at it. Sorry, Amy.  <sep>  Q: Is Amy right about Indiana Jones being irrelevant to the outcome? A: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie  Q: Why isn't Amy right though? Even Sheldon accepts that she is A: We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you think Amy ruined the movie for the guys?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie. We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him...let's assume they do... I don't remember where I heard this but there's a scene that's not in the movie. The second side of the head piece contains more info than just the 'correct' staff length. Also written on the back side are instructions not to look into the Ark...this is how Indy knows to 'KEEP YOUR EYES SHUT' when the Ark is opened. Indy learns this when he and Sallah have the head piece translated...don't know why this was left out of the movie...bad dates, maybe. Anyway, without Indy, either a) they never find the ark because they don't get the head piece without him, or b) they obtain the ark with the complete head piece but aren't killed by it because they have the instructions not to look at it. Sorry, Amy.  <sep>  Q: Is Amy right about Indiana Jones being irrelevant to the outcome? A: I don't believe Amy is correct, and it relates to a scene that isn't in the movie  Q: Why isn't Amy right though? Even Sheldon accepts that she is A: We know that the nazis had the wrong length staff because they only had one side of the head piece. Other posters have argued whether or not the nazis obtain the head piece from Marion without him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you think Amy enjoyed the movie?
Output: No
CONTEXT: This is just what I gathered from both the book and film. It's likely that the group was being watched by the others. If they'd left anything behind it would arouse their suspicion and risk failure. Being the larger and more dangerous group it would be more secure for them to be seen to move as a group rather than leave people behind.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't they leave one end of the wire at the beach?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: This is just what I gathered from both the book and film. It's likely that the group was being watched by the others. If they'd left anything behind it would arouse their suspicion and risk failure. Being the larger and more dangerous group it would be more secure for them to be seen to move as a group rather than leave people behind.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't they leave one end of the wire at the beach? A: It's likely that the group was being watched by the others. If they'd left anything behind it would arouse their suspicion and risk failure  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was there anyone else who could pair with Katniss? Seems silly to send her alone.
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Why does any government produce a genocidal weapon really? The reason that a virus was chosen is because it was supposed to be a controlled way to quickly and painlessly kill a significant portion of the population, without arousing suspicion or cause panic. A pandemic that was supposed to come and go, with the virus dying off soon may confuse or cause fear, but wouldn't cause a breakdown in society. mass executions would cause the public to rebel. Killing only criminals wouldn't work towards significantly reducing the population to make up for the dwindling food supplies caused by the heat flares of the sun. Nuclear weapons cause too much collateral damage, radiation, and the public of one area would demand revenge. They wrongly believed that the virus they manufactured would go out, kill a good percentage of the population, then go inert. It's possible with proper genetic engineering (in real life), to produce bacteria or viruses that die after a few generations. They 100% believed there was no chance for the virus to mutate and wipe humanity out of existence. They were very wrong.  <sep>  Q: Why would the Disease Department in The Maze Runner unleash a disease ?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Why does any government produce a genocidal weapon really? The reason that a virus was chosen is because it was supposed to be a controlled way to quickly and painlessly kill a significant portion of the population, without arousing suspicion or cause panic. A pandemic that was supposed to come and go, with the virus dying off soon may confuse or cause fear, but wouldn't cause a breakdown in society. mass executions would cause the public to rebel. Killing only criminals wouldn't work towards significantly reducing the population to make up for the dwindling food supplies caused by the heat flares of the sun. Nuclear weapons cause too much collateral damage, radiation, and the public of one area would demand revenge. They wrongly believed that the virus they manufactured would go out, kill a good percentage of the population, then go inert. It's possible with proper genetic engineering (in real life), to produce bacteria or viruses that die after a few generations. They 100% believed there was no chance for the virus to mutate and wipe humanity out of existence. They were very wrong.  <sep>  Q: Why would the Disease Department in The Maze Runner unleash a disease ? A: it was supposed to be a controlled way to quickly and painlessly kill a significant portion of the population  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did they think of other ways to do it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends? A: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: was there any reference that his salary was lower?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends? A: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means  Q: was there any reference that his salary was lower? A: when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: was the show friends very popular?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends? A: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means  Q: was there any reference that his salary was lower? A: when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before  Q: was the show friends very popular? A: emotional  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you thunk that Joey was lonely in the big apartment without his friends?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends? A: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means  Q: was there any reference that his salary was lower? A: when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before  Q: was the show friends very popular? A: emotional  Q: Do you thunk that Joey was lonely in the big apartment without his friends? A: was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Were his friends missing him as well?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means. When he moved to the new place, he bought all kinds of unnecessary novelties on credit and accumulated quite a lot of debt (remember the giant ceramic dog and waterfall?) As a result, when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before), he could not go back to that extravagant lifestyle, at least not without making a lot of cuts. Plus, there was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to.  <sep>  Q: Why doesn't Joey move back to the bigger apartment in Friends? A: He couldn't afford the apartment as it was because he was living beyond his means  Q: was there any reference that his salary was lower? A: when he got the new job, (even if he was making as much as before  Q: was the show friends very popular? A: emotional  Q: Do you thunk that Joey was lonely in the big apartment without his friends? A: was the emotional aspect since he wasn't enjoying living on his own as much as he had expected to  Q: Were his friends missing him as well? A: the emotional aspect  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: was the name of the soap Joey worked on Days of our lives?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Ben could've escaped whenever he wanted, he wanted to ensure that Dan sees him off in the train to Yuma, The reason being he wants Dan to succeed in his endeavor because of the promise he made to his son and his wife and also he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war and wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail. So when Charlie kills him against his orders Ben gets angry on that issue and he no longer cares for the group and he kills them all and goes in the train simply to fulfill Dan once again and once the train departs he flees on his horse.  <sep>  Q: do you think he chose to help him out of guilt?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Ben could've escaped whenever he wanted, he wanted to ensure that Dan sees him off in the train to Yuma, The reason being he wants Dan to succeed in his endeavor because of the promise he made to his son and his wife and also he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war and wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail. So when Charlie kills him against his orders Ben gets angry on that issue and he no longer cares for the group and he kills them all and goes in the train simply to fulfill Dan once again and once the train departs he flees on his horse.  <sep>  Q: do you think he chose to help him out of guilt? A: he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you feel he could show compassion for others as h did for his new friend?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Ben could've escaped whenever he wanted, he wanted to ensure that Dan sees him off in the train to Yuma, The reason being he wants Dan to succeed in his endeavor because of the promise he made to his son and his wife and also he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war and wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail. So when Charlie kills him against his orders Ben gets angry on that issue and he no longer cares for the group and he kills them all and goes in the train simply to fulfill Dan once again and once the train departs he flees on his horse.  <sep>  Q: do you think he chose to help him out of guilt? A: he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war  Q: do you feel he could show compassion for others as h did for his new friend? A: wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: are you fearful he will get angry and go back to his old ways?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Ben could've escaped whenever he wanted, he wanted to ensure that Dan sees him off in the train to Yuma, The reason being he wants Dan to succeed in his endeavor because of the promise he made to his son and his wife and also he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war and wanted to give him the fulfillment of sending the notorious criminal to the jail. So when Charlie kills him against his orders Ben gets angry on that issue and he no longer cares for the group and he kills them all and goes in the train simply to fulfill Dan once again and once the train departs he flees on his horse.  <sep>  Q: do you think he chose to help him out of guilt? A: he sympathizes with Dan on the fact that he used to be a soldier and his life changed after he sustained the injury in the war  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: that sounds about tight, so you think even mass murderers can change?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Because it is not the name she was given or known by in DCEU. Amazons call her Diana. Steve gives her name Diana Prince when they went to assembly. This name is used by everyone else later. However the name Wonder Woman is only for audience. There is another thing that nobody knows this name of her. We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet.  <sep>  Q: Is Wonder Woman even a Wonder Woman in DC Extended Universe? A: We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you know who plays her character?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because it is not the name she was given or known by in DCEU. Amazons call her Diana. Steve gives her name Diana Prince when they went to assembly. This name is used by everyone else later. However the name Wonder Woman is only for audience. There is another thing that nobody knows this name of her. We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet.  <sep>  Q: Is Wonder Woman even a Wonder Woman in DC Extended Universe? A: We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet  Q: Do you know who plays her character? A: in DCEU  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are there many women woman movies?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Because it is not the name she was given or known by in DCEU. Amazons call her Diana. Steve gives her name Diana Prince when they went to assembly. This name is used by everyone else later. However the name Wonder Woman is only for audience. There is another thing that nobody knows this name of her. We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet.  <sep>  Q: Is Wonder Woman even a Wonder Woman in DC Extended Universe? A: We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet  Q: Do you know who plays her character? A: in DCEU  Q: Are there many women woman movies? A: Wonder Woman is  Q: Was it always played by the same actor? A: Wonder Woman  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So nobody refers her as wonder woman in the DC extended universe?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion. Even if Ottway kills the Alpha, will the rest of the pack let him survive? If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured. Ottway's head is resting on top of the wolf's body. Since both are so badly injured, I think it's unlikely that either one of them will survive.  <sep>  Q: What happened at the end of The Grey?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion. Even if Ottway kills the Alpha, will the rest of the pack let him survive? If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured. Ottway's head is resting on top of the wolf's body. Since both are so badly injured, I think it's unlikely that either one of them will survive.  <sep>  Q: What happened at the end of The Grey? A: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh Well did Ottway fdie or survive
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion. Even if Ottway kills the Alpha, will the rest of the pack let him survive? If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured. Ottway's head is resting on top of the wolf's body. Since both are so badly injured, I think it's unlikely that either one of them will survive.  <sep>  Q: What happened at the end of The Grey? A: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion  Q: Oh Well did Ottway fdie or survive A: If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh Ok so 3whsat happened at ther end?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground, and the background appears to move quicker thanks to the simple fact that it's further away. The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films. In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, the shot in question is actually shown to the audience while Nicholas Angel and Danny watch the film at Danny's house.  <sep>  Q: What is this camera effect used in Hot Fuzz?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground, and the background appears to move quicker thanks to the simple fact that it's further away. The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films. In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, the shot in question is actually shown to the audience while Nicholas Angel and Danny watch the film at Danny's house.  <sep>  Q: What is this camera effect used in Hot Fuzz? A: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Have you seen this used before?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground, and the background appears to move quicker thanks to the simple fact that it's further away. The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films. In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, the shot in question is actually shown to the audience while Nicholas Angel and Danny watch the film at Danny's house.  <sep>  Q: What is this camera effect used in Hot Fuzz? A: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground  Q: Have you seen this used before? A: The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Hot Fuzz the first tme he used it?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground, and the background appears to move quicker thanks to the simple fact that it's further away. The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films. In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, the shot in question is actually shown to the audience while Nicholas Angel and Danny watch the film at Danny's house.  <sep>  Q: What is this camera effect used in Hot Fuzz? A: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground  Q: Have you seen this used before? A: The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films  Q: Was Hot Fuzz the first tme he used it? A: In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, t  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else has Michael Bay directed?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I assumed that this was because he was about to die. I mean, really die. It's the only instance of a player character losing their last life in the movie so in universe it made sense to me that it would be a different effect. Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this.  <sep>  Q: do you think this movie ends well?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I assumed that this was because he was about to die. I mean, really die. It's the only instance of a player character losing their last life in the movie so in universe it made sense to me that it would be a different effect. Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this.  <sep>  Q: Why didn't Seaplane explode when stung by a mosquito?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I assumed that this was because he was about to die. I mean, really die. It's the only instance of a player character losing their last life in the movie so in universe it made sense to me that it would be a different effect. Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this.  <sep>  Q: what do you think the point of this story line is?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I assumed that this was because he was about to die. I mean, really die. It's the only instance of a player character losing their last life in the movie so in universe it made sense to me that it would be a different effect. Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this.  <sep>  Q: do you think this movie ends well? A: Sadly I could not find any sources confirming this  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you think everyone confronts there fears?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Bill had a very bad headache and ask for medicine in prison. He was suspicious about his wife and killed her. After being arrested by police he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison. The camera man is Bill's instinct. This man is under high pressure within murdering his wife and psychologically transformed.  <sep>  Q: How did Fred Madison change into Pete Dayton in prison?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Bill had a very bad headache and ask for medicine in prison. He was suspicious about his wife and killed her. After being arrested by police he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison. The camera man is Bill's instinct. This man is under high pressure within murdering his wife and psychologically transformed.  <sep>  Q: How did Fred Madison change into Pete Dayton in prison? A: he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why was he in prison?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Bill had a very bad headache and ask for medicine in prison. He was suspicious about his wife and killed her. After being arrested by police he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison. The camera man is Bill's instinct. This man is under high pressure within murdering his wife and psychologically transformed.  <sep>  Q: How did Fred Madison change into Pete Dayton in prison? A: he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: how long was he in prison?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Bill had a very bad headache and ask for medicine in prison. He was suspicious about his wife and killed her. After being arrested by police he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison. The camera man is Bill's instinct. This man is under high pressure within murdering his wife and psychologically transformed.  <sep>  Q: How did Fred Madison change into Pete Dayton in prison? A: he psycologically transformed to a young good guy with pure heart in prison  Q: Why was he in prison? A: He was suspicious about his wife and killed her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: was Pete Dayron someone he knew before he was in prison?
Output: No
CONTEXT: He first sends the message of STAY. Remember the scene in the beginning of the movie just before Cooper visits the teachers of his children. We are shown that Murph has some thick lines on her book. In the end we are shown that she is actually figuring out the morse code behind the falling books represented by the thick lines. Thus she was indeed receiving the messages of STAY before getting the co-ordinates. Now in the teseract Cooper initially wants Murph to stay in the room, so he sends the message of STAY. When he realises that what has happened in the past cannot be changed, then he wants to save the future of mankind. That is why he sends the location of NASA to his past self.  <sep>  Q: If Cooper wanted to stay, why did he send the NASA Coordinates?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He first sends the message of STAY. Remember the scene in the beginning of the movie just before Cooper visits the teachers of his children. We are shown that Murph has some thick lines on her book. In the end we are shown that she is actually figuring out the morse code behind the falling books represented by the thick lines. Thus she was indeed receiving the messages of STAY before getting the co-ordinates. Now in the teseract Cooper initially wants Murph to stay in the room, so he sends the message of STAY. When he realises that what has happened in the past cannot be changed, then he wants to save the future of mankind. That is why he sends the location of NASA to his past self.  <sep>  Q: If Cooper wanted to stay, why did he send the NASA Coordinates? A: When he realises that what has happened in the past cannot be changed, then he wants to save the future of mankind. That is why he sends the location of NASA to his past self  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about Cooper?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though? A: Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Tyrion try to talk Jon into doing something?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though? A: Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  Q: Did Tyrion try to talk Jon into doing something? A: Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did the queen respond to the request of mercy for Tyrion?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though? A: Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  Q: Did Tyrion try to talk Jon into doing something? A: Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  Q: How did the queen respond to the request of mercy for Tyrion? A: when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So the queen favor Jon?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though? A: Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  Q: Did Tyrion try to talk Jon into doing something? A: Jon asking mercy for Tyrion  Q: How did the queen respond to the request of mercy for Tyrion? A: when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  Q: So the queen favor Jon? A: he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What did Tyrion do after the visit?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I hope I don't spoil the party with an out-of-universe explanation, but I thought that this was really interesting when I found it out: It was just supposed to be funny. The sequels weren't written yet. In the commentary on the DVD, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale explain the scene, that it was all just there for fun, including the "To be continued…". At the time, they weren't planning on making a sequel, and in their own words, were just hoping that the first movie would break even at the box office. This scene was just a sort of joke. Afterward, when the film was such a success that they were asked to write a script for a sequel, they regretted writing this scene the way that they did, because Doc and Marty brought Jennifer along, which limited their options in writing the next script. If it has just been Doc and Marty, they could have made the next movie about anything they wanted, the two guys on any crazy adventure in time. With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids. They had "painted themselves into a corner" in a way, but still managed to make an excellent story out of it!  <sep>  Q: do you think its because martys son is goin to jail in future?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I hope I don't spoil the party with an out-of-universe explanation, but I thought that this was really interesting when I found it out: It was just supposed to be funny. The sequels weren't written yet. In the commentary on the DVD, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale explain the scene, that it was all just there for fun, including the "To be continued…". At the time, they weren't planning on making a sequel, and in their own words, were just hoping that the first movie would break even at the box office. This scene was just a sort of joke. Afterward, when the film was such a success that they were asked to write a script for a sequel, they regretted writing this scene the way that they did, because Doc and Marty brought Jennifer along, which limited their options in writing the next script. If it has just been Doc and Marty, they could have made the next movie about anything they wanted, the two guys on any crazy adventure in time. With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids. They had "painted themselves into a corner" in a way, but still managed to make an excellent story out of it!  <sep>  Q: do you think its because martys son is goin to jail in future? A: With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you think the movie will be good since its about the kids?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I hope I don't spoil the party with an out-of-universe explanation, but I thought that this was really interesting when I found it out: It was just supposed to be funny. The sequels weren't written yet. In the commentary on the DVD, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale explain the scene, that it was all just there for fun, including the "To be continued…". At the time, they weren't planning on making a sequel, and in their own words, were just hoping that the first movie would break even at the box office. This scene was just a sort of joke. Afterward, when the film was such a success that they were asked to write a script for a sequel, they regretted writing this scene the way that they did, because Doc and Marty brought Jennifer along, which limited their options in writing the next script. If it has just been Doc and Marty, they could have made the next movie about anything they wanted, the two guys on any crazy adventure in time. With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids. They had "painted themselves into a corner" in a way, but still managed to make an excellent story out of it!  <sep>  Q: Why is Doc Brown in a hurry in the end of Back to the Future part 1?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I hope I don't spoil the party with an out-of-universe explanation, but I thought that this was really interesting when I found it out: It was just supposed to be funny. The sequels weren't written yet. In the commentary on the DVD, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale explain the scene, that it was all just there for fun, including the "To be continued…". At the time, they weren't planning on making a sequel, and in their own words, were just hoping that the first movie would break even at the box office. This scene was just a sort of joke. Afterward, when the film was such a success that they were asked to write a script for a sequel, they regretted writing this scene the way that they did, because Doc and Marty brought Jennifer along, which limited their options in writing the next script. If it has just been Doc and Marty, they could have made the next movie about anything they wanted, the two guys on any crazy adventure in time. With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids. They had "painted themselves into a corner" in a way, but still managed to make an excellent story out of it!  <sep>  Q: do you think its because martys son is goin to jail in future? A: With Jennifer around (and what Doc said), the second movie now had to be about their kids  Q: do you think the movie will be good since its about the kids? A: They had "painted themselves into a corner" in a way, but still managed to make an excellent story out of it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: i also wonder if they will have anymore about the kids or go back to another subject?
Output: No