niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually. I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of, making the translation very rudimentary and child-like. Or possibly, if there was not a robust movie industry in that nation in the early 1980s, the quality of the output was considered pretty poor. Or some combination of the two. So, languages that were pretty common in the "western" and US part of the world would not work, even if the country was not really familiar (where the language was Spanish, French, German or Italian) or if there were not examples of any movies from a country. Portuguese? Maybe, but a Slavic or Balkan nation or language would be ideal for that line. Probably not Poland, because there was already a Polish stereotype about intelligence that was commonly used in jokes, so there might be some confusion about intent. "Czech" was merely chosen because it's a country an English speaking audience would be aware of, but there would be almost no movies, as of that time, that anyone could reference, making it an obscure scenario. They could have easily used Romania, Bulgaria, but could not use Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, etc (nations that were, at that time, considered part of the USSR).  <sep>  Q: What's wrong with subtitles for a Czech movie, as referenced in Tootsie? A: I don't think it's a Czech-specific quip, actually  Q: Why does Julie say my lines sound like subtitles for a Czech movie? A: I believe the idea is that the lines are crude and not very intelligently written, as if someone were translating actual decent dialogue from a language they have poor command of  Q: Is there something characteristic about the...like bad grammar? A: Czech" was merely chosen because it's a country an English speaking audience would be aware of, but there would be almost no movies, as of that time, that anyone could reference  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, anything else you can tell me about Tootsie?
Output: No
CONTEXT: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together that indicated Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know. Low quality clip from "Before the Three Hour Tour:"  <sep>  Q: What is Gilligan's full name?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together that indicated Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know. Low quality clip from "Before the Three Hour Tour:"  <sep>  Q: What is Gilligan's full name? A: Willy Gilligan  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: When was that told to the audience?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together that indicated Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know. Low quality clip from "Before the Three Hour Tour:"  <sep>  Q: What is Gilligan's full name? A: Willy Gilligan  Q: When was that told to the audience? A: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else was revealed during that documentary?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together that indicated Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know. Low quality clip from "Before the Three Hour Tour:"  <sep>  Q: What is Gilligan's full name? A: Willy Gilligan  Q: When was that told to the audience? A: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour  Q: What else was revealed during that documentary? A: Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else I should know?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Well for the first film and for most of the second, the Bride is on a revenge mission where she is hunting her victims. Her identity would have to be a secret to make sure she doesn't get followed or caught. It could be Tarantino's way of breaking the 4th wall and including us in the element of mystery and disguise that the Bride has to undertake to remain anonymous. Also, this could mean we are meant to detached emotionally from her as a character until her name is finally revealed as Beatrix Kiddo by Elle Driver. This is when we see the character as fully vulnerable and when she opens up her emotions. So Tarantino thought of this as the opportune moment to unveil all secrets of this character. Or perhaps it was just Tarantino being weird and awesome.  <sep>  Q: Why is the bride's name beeped in Kill Bill Vol 1?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Well for the first film and for most of the second, the Bride is on a revenge mission where she is hunting her victims. Her identity would have to be a secret to make sure she doesn't get followed or caught. It could be Tarantino's way of breaking the 4th wall and including us in the element of mystery and disguise that the Bride has to undertake to remain anonymous. Also, this could mean we are meant to detached emotionally from her as a character until her name is finally revealed as Beatrix Kiddo by Elle Driver. This is when we see the character as fully vulnerable and when she opens up her emotions. So Tarantino thought of this as the opportune moment to unveil all secrets of this character. Or perhaps it was just Tarantino being weird and awesome.  <sep>  Q: Why is the bride's name beeped in Kill Bill Vol 1? A: It could be Tarantino's way of breaking the 4th wall and including us in the element of mystery and disguise that the Bride has to undertake to remain anonymous  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is this just a signature Tarantino move to keep us coming back for more?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's hard to say because most of the camera angles in that scene are taken from the lance side of the knights. Any sheathed weapons, such as swords, would be on the shield side for a crossdraw, and thus away from the camera angle. There is one shot from a falling horse late in the scene where the hilt of a sheathed sword becomes briefly visible. Whether this sword is strapped to the horse (a common means of keeping secondary weapons), or belongs to one of the Scots on the ground, is difficult to determine. On the other hand, non-sheathed weapons such as maces, warhammers and battleaxes tended to be attached via a strap to the belt or trousers on the right hand side. These were common secondary weapons for knights, and we should be able to see some of them in the scene, but none are visible. Chances are you are correct, and these weapons were not included as part of the cavalry equipment. Most likely this was done to reduce the cost of filming. After all, the knights get slaughtered in the scene and we don't see any scenes where they get to fight back after falling from their horses, so these weapons are redundant from a filming standpoint.  <sep>  Q: Are the cavalry knights missing close melee weapons in Braveheart?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's hard to say because most of the camera angles in that scene are taken from the lance side of the knights. Any sheathed weapons, such as swords, would be on the shield side for a crossdraw, and thus away from the camera angle. There is one shot from a falling horse late in the scene where the hilt of a sheathed sword becomes briefly visible. Whether this sword is strapped to the horse (a common means of keeping secondary weapons), or belongs to one of the Scots on the ground, is difficult to determine. On the other hand, non-sheathed weapons such as maces, warhammers and battleaxes tended to be attached via a strap to the belt or trousers on the right hand side. These were common secondary weapons for knights, and we should be able to see some of them in the scene, but none are visible. Chances are you are correct, and these weapons were not included as part of the cavalry equipment. Most likely this was done to reduce the cost of filming. After all, the knights get slaughtered in the scene and we don't see any scenes where they get to fight back after falling from their horses, so these weapons are redundant from a filming standpoint.  <sep>  Q: Are the cavalry knights missing close melee weapons in Braveheart? A: It's hard to say because most of the camera angles in that scene are taken from the lance side of the knights  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do u agree with me when i say they should have did different angles so we can better understand?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's hard to say because most of the camera angles in that scene are taken from the lance side of the knights. Any sheathed weapons, such as swords, would be on the shield side for a crossdraw, and thus away from the camera angle. There is one shot from a falling horse late in the scene where the hilt of a sheathed sword becomes briefly visible. Whether this sword is strapped to the horse (a common means of keeping secondary weapons), or belongs to one of the Scots on the ground, is difficult to determine. On the other hand, non-sheathed weapons such as maces, warhammers and battleaxes tended to be attached via a strap to the belt or trousers on the right hand side. These were common secondary weapons for knights, and we should be able to see some of them in the scene, but none are visible. Chances are you are correct, and these weapons were not included as part of the cavalry equipment. Most likely this was done to reduce the cost of filming. After all, the knights get slaughtered in the scene and we don't see any scenes where they get to fight back after falling from their horses, so these weapons are redundant from a filming standpoint.  <sep>  Q: Are the cavalry knights missing close melee weapons in Braveheart? A: It's hard to say because most of the camera angles in that scene are taken from the lance side of the knights  Q: do u agree with me when i say they should have did different angles so we can better understand? A: There is one shot from a falling horse late in the scene where the hilt of a sheathed sword becomes briefly visible  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: ok awesome i will look again, do you this melee would be a much needed wepon
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think that they may be modeling the initial fear and then subsequent relaxing of fears in the same way HIV/AIDS was viewed initially. At first it was believed that being around people that were infected would cause you to be infected as well (drinking after someone, etc), but this was eventually dispelled. From the Dr. at the CDC, Rick learns that they have all been infected and carry a dormant form of the zombie disease, but being bitten, scratched or dying accelerates the progression. In the case of Herschel and his leg, we see that if you are able to remove the infection quick enough, one can survive a bite. This may have been different in season 1, where you see several examples of people committing suicide or dying without turning. In Season 3 and going forward, I think its understood that you don't turn till you are attacked and/or die.  <sep>  Q: As of S03E01, does walker blood have an effect on open orifices/wounds?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think that they may be modeling the initial fear and then subsequent relaxing of fears in the same way HIV/AIDS was viewed initially. At first it was believed that being around people that were infected would cause you to be infected as well (drinking after someone, etc), but this was eventually dispelled. From the Dr. at the CDC, Rick learns that they have all been infected and carry a dormant form of the zombie disease, but being bitten, scratched or dying accelerates the progression. In the case of Herschel and his leg, we see that if you are able to remove the infection quick enough, one can survive a bite. This may have been different in season 1, where you see several examples of people committing suicide or dying without turning. In Season 3 and going forward, I think its understood that you don't turn till you are attacked and/or die.  <sep>  Q: As of S03E01, does walker blood have an effect on open orifices/wounds? A: At first it was believed that being around people that were infected would cause you to be infected as well (drinking after someone, etc), but this was eventually dispelled  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: During the first episode of season 3 of the walking dead, I noticed the group is now very cavalier about taking down walkers
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think that they may be modeling the initial fear and then subsequent relaxing of fears in the same way HIV/AIDS was viewed initially. At first it was believed that being around people that were infected would cause you to be infected as well (drinking after someone, etc), but this was eventually dispelled. From the Dr. at the CDC, Rick learns that they have all been infected and carry a dormant form of the zombie disease, but being bitten, scratched or dying accelerates the progression. In the case of Herschel and his leg, we see that if you are able to remove the infection quick enough, one can survive a bite. This may have been different in season 1, where you see several examples of people committing suicide or dying without turning. In Season 3 and going forward, I think its understood that you don't turn till you are attacked and/or die.  <sep>  Q: As of S03E01, does walker blood have an effect on open orifices/wounds? A: At first it was believed that being around people that were infected would cause you to be infected as well (drinking after someone, etc), but this was eventually dispelled  Q: During the first episode of season 3 of the walking dead, I noticed the group is now very cavalier about taking down walkers A: In Season 3 and going forward, I think its understood that you don't turn till you are attacked and/or die  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: this is a staunch contrast from the first season when they covered themselves in walker parts to get through Atlanta.
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: At the end Cage was not in the camp as a trainee or deserter, but as a major. When he awoke in the helicopter after killing the Omega, the time was still before his encounter with General Brigham. So at this time he still had his complete military status as Major Cage, since there was no need to go into the field anymore and thus no need to desert at all. The only reason why he was at the camp was to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her. He simply needed to tell her what an amazing adventure they just experienced, though knowing that she certainly didn't experience it at all, which is also the reason why he smiles, trying to find the words to convice her of all they've been through, just this time under a happier premise. And in fact he had just seen her die, so first of all, he needed to make sure she was still alive, even if knowing it.  <sep>  Q: Why does Cage visit the camp after the Omega is dead?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: At the end Cage was not in the camp as a trainee or deserter, but as a major. When he awoke in the helicopter after killing the Omega, the time was still before his encounter with General Brigham. So at this time he still had his complete military status as Major Cage, since there was no need to go into the field anymore and thus no need to desert at all. The only reason why he was at the camp was to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her. He simply needed to tell her what an amazing adventure they just experienced, though knowing that she certainly didn't experience it at all, which is also the reason why he smiles, trying to find the words to convice her of all they've been through, just this time under a happier premise. And in fact he had just seen her die, so first of all, he needed to make sure she was still alive, even if knowing it.  <sep>  Q: Why does Cage visit the camp after the Omega is dead? A: to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was he falling in love with her?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: At the end Cage was not in the camp as a trainee or deserter, but as a major. When he awoke in the helicopter after killing the Omega, the time was still before his encounter with General Brigham. So at this time he still had his complete military status as Major Cage, since there was no need to go into the field anymore and thus no need to desert at all. The only reason why he was at the camp was to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her. He simply needed to tell her what an amazing adventure they just experienced, though knowing that she certainly didn't experience it at all, which is also the reason why he smiles, trying to find the words to convice her of all they've been through, just this time under a happier premise. And in fact he had just seen her die, so first of all, he needed to make sure she was still alive, even if knowing it.  <sep>  Q: Why does Cage visit the camp after the Omega is dead? A: to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection  Q: Was he falling in love with her? A: he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, he wasn't at the camp only because he got arrested?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: At the end Cage was not in the camp as a trainee or deserter, but as a major. When he awoke in the helicopter after killing the Omega, the time was still before his encounter with General Brigham. So at this time he still had his complete military status as Major Cage, since there was no need to go into the field anymore and thus no need to desert at all. The only reason why he was at the camp was to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her. He simply needed to tell her what an amazing adventure they just experienced, though knowing that she certainly didn't experience it at all, which is also the reason why he smiles, trying to find the words to convice her of all they've been through, just this time under a happier premise. And in fact he had just seen her die, so first of all, he needed to make sure she was still alive, even if knowing it.  <sep>  Q: Why does Cage visit the camp after the Omega is dead? A: to seek out Rita Vrataski, but not because he had to prepare her for the upcoming fight as he did hundreds of days before, but because against her advice he grew a strong affection  Q: Was he falling in love with her? A: he grew a strong affection, if not love, for her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did she feel the same about him?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It is the first episode of the first season. Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run. It is likely that they had him with a notebook at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory.  <sep>  Q: Why does Reid scribble into his notebook `Extreme Aggressor`
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It is the first episode of the first season. Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run. It is likely that they had him with a notebook at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory.  <sep>  Q: Why does Reid scribble into his notebook `Extreme Aggressor` A: at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do they address why he has a notebook?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It is the first episode of the first season. Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run. It is likely that they had him with a notebook at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory.  <sep>  Q: Why does Reid scribble into his notebook `Extreme Aggressor` A: at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory  Q: Do they address why he has a notebook? A: Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he ever use a notebook in later episodes?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He's talking about the stress of the job. It's a common "joke" (though not really funny when you consider recent suicide rates) that is based on either suicide or stress. "I'm not sure what's going to kill me first, the stress from these people or the stress from this job" "I'm not sure what's going to make me kill myself first, dealing with these people or dealing with this job" Sam is essentially saying, "I always knew somehow this train would be the death of me." It's not really clear whether he was saying it in jest or if he truly believed it, but that's essentially what that quote means.  <sep>  Q: What is the meaning of Sam's words?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He's talking about the stress of the job. It's a common "joke" (though not really funny when you consider recent suicide rates) that is based on either suicide or stress. "I'm not sure what's going to kill me first, the stress from these people or the stress from this job" "I'm not sure what's going to make me kill myself first, dealing with these people or dealing with this job" Sam is essentially saying, "I always knew somehow this train would be the death of me." It's not really clear whether he was saying it in jest or if he truly believed it, but that's essentially what that quote means.  <sep>  Q: What is the meaning of Sam's words? A: He's talking about the stress of the job. It's a common "joke" (though not really funny when you consider recent suicide rates) that is based on either suicide or stress  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was he able to disconnect the last car of the train?
Output: No
CONTEXT: He's talking about the stress of the job. It's a common "joke" (though not really funny when you consider recent suicide rates) that is based on either suicide or stress. "I'm not sure what's going to kill me first, the stress from these people or the stress from this job" "I'm not sure what's going to make me kill myself first, dealing with these people or dealing with this job" Sam is essentially saying, "I always knew somehow this train would be the death of me." It's not really clear whether he was saying it in jest or if he truly believed it, but that's essentially what that quote means.  <sep>  Q: What is the meaning of Sam's words? A: He's talking about the stress of the job. It's a common "joke" (though not really funny when you consider recent suicide rates) that is based on either suicide or stress  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else of importance I should know?
Output: No
CONTEXT: When The Six Million Dollar Man premiered (1973) in the United States had just ended its involvement in the Vietnam War. The US military was not held in high regards in many circles and having Austin be a veteran might have been seen as "problematic." The pilot seems to have done away with this by having Austin be a civilian test pilot who was the only civilian ever sent to the Moon. After two additional television films (during which Steve Austin was returned to his former military rank) the series was picked up by ABC as a weekly series in 1974. The improbability of Austin having been a civilian astronaut was probably brought the attention of the producers who simply changed the back story during the second pilot film. In this respect, the television series began to match Martin Caidin's novels. The show later expanded upon Austin's background adding a family and then later love interest, Jamie Sommers, who herself became The Bionic Woman.  <sep>  Q: What plot points/cultural significance would making Steve Austin a civilian member of NASA have served?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: When The Six Million Dollar Man premiered (1973) in the United States had just ended its involvement in the Vietnam War. The US military was not held in high regards in many circles and having Austin be a veteran might have been seen as "problematic." The pilot seems to have done away with this by having Austin be a civilian test pilot who was the only civilian ever sent to the Moon. After two additional television films (during which Steve Austin was returned to his former military rank) the series was picked up by ABC as a weekly series in 1974. The improbability of Austin having been a civilian astronaut was probably brought the attention of the producers who simply changed the back story during the second pilot film. In this respect, the television series began to match Martin Caidin's novels. The show later expanded upon Austin's background adding a family and then later love interest, Jamie Sommers, who herself became The Bionic Woman.  <sep>  Q: What plot points/cultural significance would making Steve Austin a civilian member of NASA have served? A: The pilot seems to have done away with this by having Austin be a civilian test pilot who was the only civilian ever sent to the Moon  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: i have not read the Martin Caidin novels, but evidently he held the military rank and background in those.
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created? A: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, but when he created 12 different metas did he know the powers of each one?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created? A: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything  Q: Okay, but when he created 12 different metas did he know the powers of each one? A: he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he create each metas according to his needs?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created? A: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything  Q: Okay, but when he created 12 different metas did he know the powers of each one? A: he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event  Q: Did he create each metas according to his needs? A: Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Anything else you can tell me about Thinker?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created? A: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything  Q: Okay, but when he created 12 different metas did he know the powers of each one? A: he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event  Q: Did he create each metas according to his needs? A: Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was the dark matter they were exposed to in the bus?
Output: No
CONTEXT: He did not go to any teachers about doing "lines with that special quill". Actually, Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go. (I looked for a clip, but could not find one. All the searches go directly to Harry and Umbridge.) Hermione then says that it is simple (a clear-cut case for which any teacher would act on behalf of the student). But Harry says something to the effect that whatever it is, it is not simple. And then he walks away. In the book, it's Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge. Then Ron suggests doing to Dumbledore. But Harry is upset with Dumbledore because he has refused to speak with Harry for the longest time. McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story, and for different reasons.  <sep>  Q: Did Harry Potter tell Professor McGonagall about Umbridge's punishment?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He did not go to any teachers about doing "lines with that special quill". Actually, Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go. (I looked for a clip, but could not find one. All the searches go directly to Harry and Umbridge.) Hermione then says that it is simple (a clear-cut case for which any teacher would act on behalf of the student). But Harry says something to the effect that whatever it is, it is not simple. And then he walks away. In the book, it's Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge. Then Ron suggests doing to Dumbledore. But Harry is upset with Dumbledore because he has refused to speak with Harry for the longest time. McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story, and for different reasons.  <sep>  Q: Did Harry Potter tell Professor McGonagall about Umbridge's punishment? A: Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Harry go to anyone else?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He did not go to any teachers about doing "lines with that special quill". Actually, Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go. (I looked for a clip, but could not find one. All the searches go directly to Harry and Umbridge.) Hermione then says that it is simple (a clear-cut case for which any teacher would act on behalf of the student). But Harry says something to the effect that whatever it is, it is not simple. And then he walks away. In the book, it's Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge. Then Ron suggests doing to Dumbledore. But Harry is upset with Dumbledore because he has refused to speak with Harry for the longest time. McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story, and for different reasons.  <sep>  Q: Did Harry Potter tell Professor McGonagall about Umbridge's punishment? A: Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge  Q: Did Harry go to anyone else? A: Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does McGonagall have a confrontation with Umbridge?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: He did not go to any teachers about doing "lines with that special quill". Actually, Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go. (I looked for a clip, but could not find one. All the searches go directly to Harry and Umbridge.) Hermione then says that it is simple (a clear-cut case for which any teacher would act on behalf of the student). But Harry says something to the effect that whatever it is, it is not simple. And then he walks away. In the book, it's Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge. Then Ron suggests doing to Dumbledore. But Harry is upset with Dumbledore because he has refused to speak with Harry for the longest time. McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story, and for different reasons.  <sep>  Q: Did Harry Potter tell Professor McGonagall about Umbridge's punishment? A: Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge  Q: Did Harry go to anyone else? A: Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go  Q: Does McGonagall have a confrontation with Umbridge? A: McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it because of Harry's punishment
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I'd always wondered exactly why we got so much of the little relationship details between Butch and Fabienne. I decided that the subtext of the scenes was that she was pregnant. It explains a lot, including that Butch was getting out of boxing and getting serious about settling down, and why he dreamed of his father's gold watch before the fight. After rewatching the film, I decided that she probably was, and that was part of the point of seeing those scenes. I then decided to look up what the name Fabienne means, because of the theory that all the names in Pulp Fiction mean something, except for Esmarelda the Cab driver, who tells us that all names mean something. Fabienne is a female version of the Roman family name Fabius, which means 'Bean Grower'. Pregnant.  <sep>  Q: Is there a deeper meaning to Fabienne's pot belly talk?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I'd always wondered exactly why we got so much of the little relationship details between Butch and Fabienne. I decided that the subtext of the scenes was that she was pregnant. It explains a lot, including that Butch was getting out of boxing and getting serious about settling down, and why he dreamed of his father's gold watch before the fight. After rewatching the film, I decided that she probably was, and that was part of the point of seeing those scenes. I then decided to look up what the name Fabienne means, because of the theory that all the names in Pulp Fiction mean something, except for Esmarelda the Cab driver, who tells us that all names mean something. Fabienne is a female version of the Roman family name Fabius, which means 'Bean Grower'. Pregnant.  <sep>  Q: Is there a deeper meaning to Fabienne's pot belly talk? A: the subtext of the scenes was that she was pregnant  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else makes you think she is pregnant?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I'd always wondered exactly why we got so much of the little relationship details between Butch and Fabienne. I decided that the subtext of the scenes was that she was pregnant. It explains a lot, including that Butch was getting out of boxing and getting serious about settling down, and why he dreamed of his father's gold watch before the fight. After rewatching the film, I decided that she probably was, and that was part of the point of seeing those scenes. I then decided to look up what the name Fabienne means, because of the theory that all the names in Pulp Fiction mean something, except for Esmarelda the Cab driver, who tells us that all names mean something. Fabienne is a female version of the Roman family name Fabius, which means 'Bean Grower'. Pregnant.  <sep>  Q: Is there a deeper meaning to Fabienne's pot belly talk? A: the subtext of the scenes was that she was pregnant  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are they happy about being pregnant?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak? A: The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: And does that protect them in some way?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak? A: The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder  Q: And does that protect them in some way? A: If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: But, I thought Ivy knew the creatures weren't real?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak? A: The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder  Q: And does that protect them in some way? A: If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there  Q: But, I thought Ivy knew the creatures weren't real? A: Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What exactly are they doing?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak? A: The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder  Q: And does that protect them in some way? A: If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there  Q: But, I thought Ivy knew the creatures weren't real? A: Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did they use scare tactics to stope the villagers from traveling into other towns?
Output: No
CONTEXT: The Yellow clothes are a type of 'Elder Endorsement', a ratification or 'pass'. The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder, so it is a sanctioned activity. If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there. It's unlikely the 'beasts' would harm her, but they'd certainly interfere and try and scare her off/back to the village. Ivy possibly doesn't know what they're capable of. Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing, but within the narrative of the film her maintaining her cloak's yellow lustre removes that possibility.  <sep>  Q: Why was Ivy concerned with wiping the mud off of her yellow cloak? A: The village guardians who dress up as the beasts know that if someone is dressed in yellow they have been given the Yellow cloak under the supervision of a village elder  Q: And does that protect them in some way? A: If someone is found wandering without one, it will be assumed they're not supposed to be there  Q: But, I thought Ivy knew the creatures weren't real? A: Of course, Ivy could at this point tell them she knows they're not really beasts and knows what they're doing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did her dad tell her the truth only because she was blind?
Output: No
CONTEXT: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction, back to the main base. If she really wanted she could have stepped directly on the bus or blasted it with her huge gun, but did not. On the other hand, all the humans that just successfully executed their plan to trap your ship are fleeing on the big yellow vehicle, so if it gets destroyed in the process that would be fine.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Queen chase the school bus?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction, back to the main base. If she really wanted she could have stepped directly on the bus or blasted it with her huge gun, but did not. On the other hand, all the humans that just successfully executed their plan to trap your ship are fleeing on the big yellow vehicle, so if it gets destroyed in the process that would be fine.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Queen chase the school bus? A: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where are they headed?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction, back to the main base. If she really wanted she could have stepped directly on the bus or blasted it with her huge gun, but did not. On the other hand, all the humans that just successfully executed their plan to trap your ship are fleeing on the big yellow vehicle, so if it gets destroyed in the process that would be fine.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Queen chase the school bus? A: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction  Q: Where are they headed? A: back to the main base  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why didn't she stop them?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction, back to the main base. If she really wanted she could have stepped directly on the bus or blasted it with her huge gun, but did not. On the other hand, all the humans that just successfully executed their plan to trap your ship are fleeing on the big yellow vehicle, so if it gets destroyed in the process that would be fine.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Queen chase the school bus? A: From the movie it didn't appear that she was particularly interested in chasing the school bus. They just happened to be going in the same direction  Q: Where are they headed? A: back to the main base  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What are they going to do there?
Output: No