niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes (read: prevents carpal tunnel or repetitive stress injuries of the wrist). It's considered one of the best split key keyboards, with nice heavy clicky action (for a membrane based keyboard). It (the whole series really) is consistently ranked as one of the best keyboards. It's an off the shelf product, not a specially designed prop. Source: looking at the one ten feet to my left.  <sep>  Q: What type of keyboard is Caden Cotard using? A: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes  Q: is it easier to use than a regular keyboard? A: It's considered one of the best split key keyboards, with nice heavy clicky action (for a membrane based keyboard). It (the whole series really) is consistently ranked as one of the best keyboards  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: would it help with pain from carpal tunnel syndrome?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes (read: prevents carpal tunnel or repetitive stress injuries of the wrist). It's considered one of the best split key keyboards, with nice heavy clicky action (for a membrane based keyboard). It (the whole series really) is consistently ranked as one of the best keyboards. It's an off the shelf product, not a specially designed prop. Source: looking at the one ten feet to my left.  <sep>  Q: What type of keyboard is Caden Cotard using? A: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: it is pretty cool looking can you still buy one like it?
Output: No
CONTEXT: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes (read: prevents carpal tunnel or repetitive stress injuries of the wrist). It's considered one of the best split key keyboards, with nice heavy clicky action (for a membrane based keyboard). It (the whole series really) is consistently ranked as one of the best keyboards. It's an off the shelf product, not a specially designed prop. Source: looking at the one ten feet to my left.  <sep>  Q: What type of keyboard is Caden Cotard using? A: That's a regular Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite. It's a split key format, for ergonomic purposes  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what job does his character do in the movie?
Output: No
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway? A: When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What makes the crowd so chaotic?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway? A: When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him  Q: What makes the crowd so chaotic? A: At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything you can tell me about the Subway the movie was filmed in?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway? A: When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him  Q: What makes the crowd so chaotic? A: At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic  Q: Is there anything you can tell me about the Subway the movie was filmed in? A: Grand Central Station  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many people were involved in the dance scene at the subway?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway? A: When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him  Q: What makes the crowd so chaotic? A: At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic  Q: Is there anything you can tell me about the Subway the movie was filmed in? A: Grand Central Station  Q: How many people were involved in the dance scene at the subway? A:   <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who directed the movie?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: It's in Parry's mind. At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic. Parry is looking for Lydia, whom he is in love with. When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him. Parry has a smile on his face. He follows Lydia through the sweetly dancing couples, all the way across Grand Central Station, and the universe is in harmony, for him. When he finally loses sight of Lydia on the other side, the couples go back to being a crowd, and the music stops and is replaced with the dissonant noises of the throng. Here is the scene: EDIT I also found an interview with director Terry Gilliam (below) regarding that particular scene. In the video, at 2:10, he says, "I just love the idea of Perry being so in love that, you know, the world changes to whatever dreams he has."  <sep>  Q: Why people were dancing at the subway? A: When Parry sees Lydia, classical music starts, and the chaotic crowd is now in sync (in Parry's mind). They begin waltzing around him  Q: What makes the crowd so chaotic? A: At the start of the scene, people in Grand Central Station are just walking, making noise, chaotic  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it a flash mob?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What did the accused do exactly?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character  Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who reported the shooting?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character  Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was it done purposely or by a mistake?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character  Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart  Q: Who reported the shooting? A: This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Santiago a bystander or was he involved?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver  Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character  Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart  Q: Who reported the shooting? A: This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was the charge?
Output: No
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose? A: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did they have to choose a different person each time they went one level deeper in Inception?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose? A: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously  Q: Why did they have to choose a different person each time they went one level deeper in Inception? A: For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Couldn't they have kept going into Yusuf's dream all the way down?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose? A: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously  Q: Why did they have to choose a different person each time they went one level deeper in Inception? A: For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence  Q: Couldn't they have kept going into Yusuf's dream all the way down? A: This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many dream levels are there?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose? A: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously  Q: Why did they have to choose a different person each time they went one level deeper in Inception? A: For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence  Q: Couldn't they have kept going into Yusuf's dream all the way down? A: This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames  Q: How many dream levels are there? A: he needs 3 dream levels  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there a literal sleep machine or was Pasiv used as the sleep machine?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously. For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence, in order to allow people to go down to the next level (the hotel dream of Arthur). For someone to simultaneously be maintaining level 1 and be able to go to 'sleep' and maintain level 2 seems unlikely - you'd essentially have to be 'awake' in each dream state. So it appears for the dream within a dream thing to work, you need as many people to dream as levels you wish to descend. This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames) - and he does not want to be a dreamer himself (for obvious reasons), and Ariadne was a late addition to the team.  <sep>  Q: Was it impossible to go into same person's dream each level down, or did it serve a purpose? A: I think it comes down to one point - can one mind actively dream two or more states simultaneously  Q: Why did they have to choose a different person each time they went one level deeper in Inception? A: For the dream within a dream thing to work .... the dreamer in level 1 (Yusuf) has to dream the Pasiv (sleep) machine into existence  Q: Couldn't they have kept going into Yusuf's dream all the way down? A: This appears to be why Cobb wants Yusuf to 'go into the field', as he needs 3 dream levels (Yusuf, Arthur, Eames  Q: How many dream levels are there? A: he needs 3 dream levels  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it possible to go further than 3?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Leverage. Xavier's seizures cause everyone to be paralyzed. Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is. By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier. It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope.  <sep>  Q: Why does Logan stab walls?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Leverage. Xavier's seizures cause everyone to be paralyzed. Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is. By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier. It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope.  <sep>  Q: Why does Logan stab walls? A: By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why was Xavier hard to reach?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Leverage. Xavier's seizures cause everyone to be paralyzed. Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is. By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier. It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope.  <sep>  Q: Why does Logan stab walls? A: By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier  Q: Why was Xavier hard to reach? A: Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How does Logan stab the wall?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Leverage. Xavier's seizures cause everyone to be paralyzed. Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is. By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier. It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope.  <sep>  Q: Why does Logan stab walls? A: By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where was Xavier?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Leverage. Xavier's seizures cause everyone to be paralyzed. Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is. By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier. It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope.  <sep>  Q: Why does Logan stab walls? A: By stabbing the walls, he uses them to climb towards an increasingly difficult to reach Xavier  Q: Why was Xavier hard to reach? A: Logan's healing factor allows him some movement, but the closer he moves to Xavier the stronger the effect by Xavier is  Q: How does Logan stab the wall? A: It provides a hand hold he can push against, like rock climbing or climbing a rope  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Logans weight distribution make him heavy that the blades won't stay in the wall?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So he wasn't eligible?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct  Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion? A: He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who is the main character?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct  Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion? A: He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot  Q: Who is the main character? A: Saroo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Saroo have a last name in this film?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct  Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion? A: He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot  Q: Who is the main character? A: Saroo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: When did the movie Lion come out?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct.  <sep>  Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so  Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy  Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct  Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion? A: He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot  Q: Who is the main character? A: Saroo  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is the main character a friend of the other guy?
Output: No
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are you sure because I googled it and couldn't find anything explicit?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  Q: Are you sure because I googled it and couldn't find anything explicit? A: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, why is Ramsay covered in blood when he arrives in the kennels?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  Q: Are you sure because I googled it and couldn't find anything explicit? A: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear  Q: Okay, why is Ramsay covered in blood when he arrives in the kennels? A: Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did she try and kill im by strangling him?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  Q: Are you sure because I googled it and couldn't find anything explicit? A: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear  Q: Okay, why is Ramsay covered in blood when he arrives in the kennels? A: Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex  Q: Did she try and kill im by strangling him? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does it seem that she enjoys it too?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear. Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex. In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it. The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her. She is on the cast list to appear in Season 5, so she's almost certainly not dead.  <sep>  Q: Did Myranda try to kill Ramsay? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  Q: Are you sure because I googled it and couldn't find anything explicit? A: There's a longer version of this scene in the Season 4 trailer, which was cut down for the episode, that makes things more clear  Q: Okay, why is Ramsay covered in blood when he arrives in the kennels? A: Ramsay is a sadomasochist; he enjoys giving and receiving pain, especially during sex  Q: Did she try and kill im by strangling him? A: In the extended version, Myranda not only chokes Ramsay, but also slaps him around a bit. He's enjoying it  Q: Does it seem that she enjoys it too? A: The fact that we don't see Myranda after that, I suspect, is simply to the fact that we haven't had any reason to see her  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What about the scene where Yara tries to free Theon from the Deathfort?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin? A: Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why does Roslin try to take charge on the ship she is on?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin? A: Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand  Q: Why does Roslin try to take charge on the ship she is on? A: This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it possible he was trying to position himself or another to take charge?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin? A: Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand  Q: Why does Roslin try to take charge on the ship she is on? A: This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why do they want the genocide of humanity?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin? A: Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand  Q: Why does Roslin try to take charge on the ship she is on? A: This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Lee Adama trying to prevent some semblance of order?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Yes. This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity. This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives. Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand.  <sep>  Q: Why was Doral opposing Roslin? A: Doral is doing everything he can to ensure that the humans are in-fighting so that the Cylons can get an upper hand  Q: Why does Roslin try to take charge on the ship she is on? A: This Doral is amongst the Cylons who want the genocide of humanity  Q: Is it possible he was trying to position himself or another to take charge? A: This is much before the Cylons vote to give humanity a chance, ending their all out attacks for alternative motives  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh I see, anything else you can tell me about this movie?
Output: No
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, I'm confused about one thing...why did Nina help Jack if she was a mole?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  Q: Okay, I'm confused about one thing...why did Nina help Jack if she was a mole? A: The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh I see, why does Nina unexpectedly call Palmer and asks him to help save Jack in episode 22?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  Q: Okay, I'm confused about one thing...why did Nina help Jack if she was a mole? A: The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack  Q: Oh I see, why does Nina unexpectedly call Palmer and asks him to help save Jack in episode 22? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, but why would she go out of her way when she obviously didn't have to?
Output: Yes
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  Q: Okay, I'm confused about one thing...why did Nina help Jack if she was a mole? A: The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack  Q: Oh I see, why does Nina unexpectedly call Palmer and asks him to help save Jack in episode 22? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  Q: Okay, but why would she go out of her way when she obviously didn't have to? A: Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you think that Nina's behavior adds up to the season't final plot twist?
Output: No