niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
CONTEXT: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him. The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack. Therefore Nina basically has to get Alexis free for the Drazen to make the final assasination attempt  <sep>  Q: Why does Nina Myers call Palmer in episode 22 to help save Jack from the Drazens? A: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him  Q: Okay, I'm confused about one thing...why did Nina help Jack if she was a mole? A: The Drazens planned this but saw an opportunity to get Alexis free by trading him for Jack  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh I see, why does Nina unexpectedly call Palmer and asks him to help save Jack in episode 22?
Output: Her objective is to ensure Palmer is killed - and Jack is the best way to get the phone bomb close to him
CONTEXT: Yes, it's done. In Telugu movie Sye (2004), there is a song Urura Urura. The main characters literally sing what is shown on wall posters, cutouts, and hoardings. (I am a Telugu speaking person.) The postures, hoardings are in Telugu and he reads the same. For English for crosschecking, see the video from 1:13 to 1:24.  <sep>  Q: Has this "lyrics with song" style of scene ever been done? A: In Telugu movie Sye (2004), there is a song Urura Urura. The main characters literally sing what is shown on wall posters, cutouts, and hoardings. (I am a Telugu speaking person  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did you know that some of the Coffee Run scene has the lyrics in graffiti on the walls?
Output: The main characters literally sing what is shown on wall posters, cutouts, and hoardings. (I am a Telugu speaking person
CONTEXT: He usually runs unopposed. The only time he did run against anyone he lost but that was to Sideshow Bob. Quimby was re-instated when Bob is found guilty of fraud and imprisoned. He also survives a recall election, with no candidate in the race against him garnering the five percent necessary to force a recall  <sep>  Q: Why is Mayor Quimby still mayor? A: He usually runs unopposed  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Has it ever been addressed on the show?
Output: Sideshow Bob. Qu
CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience.  <sep>  Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience  Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though? A: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, for up ad coming directors, is this the type of movie to stay away from
Output: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience
CONTEXT: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark. Their working together and sharing their personal issues caused Banner to rethink the way he thought of "the other guy". Stark coped with his condition by turning it into the Iron Man, and helping others. Banner still feared what "the other guy" would do when unleashed. This was then reinforced after he is induced into becoming the Hulk on the Helicarrier. Upon awaking in the abandoned warehouse and learning the Hulk aimed for it to prevent casualties, Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others. Thusly he chose to join the other heroes in New York City to defend Earth, whereas earlier in the film he had made it abundantly clear that his only role was to identify the location of the Tesseract.  <sep>  Q: Why does Banner finally allow the Hulk to come out? A: Banner came to realize that the Hulk isn't always a danger to others  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where does he get the confident he needs to be sure he can point the beast towards the enemy, and not towards the Avengers?
Output: Largely he gains his confidence from Tony Stark
CONTEXT: In some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages. The latter of which can not typically begin until the final edit is determined. In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases. As film companies see better returns internationally, they try to shorten this process or build it in for a world-wide release. In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons. One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited, or in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay.  <sep>  Q: What's with the trend of releasing movies outside the US first? A: In the cases of American film releases outside the US first; there are a number of reasons  Q: Why are movies being released this way? A: One can be to build US expectation; to assess general reaction before domestic release in the event the film needs to be reedited  Q: I think the films should be released in the US first as intended. What are the other reasons why? A: in some cases the delays above (such as rating or licensing) may cause a delay  Q: what kind of rating or licensing issue cause delays? A: n some cases the original delay involved the time required for licensing (music), appropriate copyrights, ratings, and in some cases the redubbing of the film into other languages  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long does it usually take to do this before official release?
Output: In some major films (especially action films) the final edit may not be complete until the film initially releases
CONTEXT: I have not seen the movie so I have not seen the tools themselves. However operations which require cutting bone often require tools which might at first glance look like conventional power tools, such as drills. Tools designed for operations are designed to be very controllable in terms of speeds and the cutting implements themselves are made of high quality materials to prevent contamination, and can be autoclaved to be sterilized (using high pressure and temperature) but essentially they are not that far removed from hardware tools. In terms of being awake during surgery. The main reason to anaesthetise a patient in an operation is to prevent the pain and stop any movement which would disturb the operation. The scalp itself has pain receptors but the brain has none, once the work has progressed into the brain itself no pain from that part would be felt, but with a local topical anaesthetic the scalp might not be too painful. One could imagine that you could be awake but not be in much discomfort in a brain operation.  <sep>  Q: Is the brain sequence similar to reality or not? A: operations which require cutting bone often require tools which might at first glance look like conventional power tools, such as drills  Q: How can a person speak during his open brain surgery? A: The scalp itself has pain receptors but the brain has none, once the work has progressed into the brain itself no pain from that part would be felt  Q: How can they perform an operation where hardware tools are used rather than medical instruments? A: Tools designed for operations are designed to be very controllable in terms of speeds and the cutting implements themselves are made of high quality materials to prevent contamination  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: But, is there any similarity between this operation sequence and reality?
Output: I have not seen the movie so I have not seen the tools themselves
CONTEXT: Regardless of whether Sully is the only one that has a real nose, Pixar did minimize noses for a reason, as discussed in the question comments. The monsters are meant to look inhuman and unfamiliar. Taking off noses makes them distinctly non-mammalian, and makes the world monstrous instead of just populated with animals. Sully, however, has to walk the line between a teddy bear and a blue Sasquatch so that Boo can both be terrified of him and grow to love him. The nose and the shaggy fur make him look approachable to both Boo and little kids in the audience.  <sep>  Q: Why is Sulley the only monster in the Monsters Inc films to have a nose? A: Pixar did minimize noses for a reason, as discussed in the question comments. The monsters are meant to look inhuman and unfamiliar  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did they do anything else to make them look less human?
Output: aking off noses makes them distinctly non-mammalian, and makes the world monstrous instead of just populated with animals
CONTEXT: Usually these kinds of stunts are done by some trained stunt men (dupe for the hero), they wear protective gear like lunatic vests. Mostly, you can see car drag scenes on a flat surface, off-road (where the friction is gonna' be less compared to rubberised roads) as it can be easiy performed with necessary protective gear and by a trained stunt man. But when it comes to on-road, they get the help of Computer Graphics.  <sep>  Q: How are car drag scenes filmed without hurting anyone? A: Mostly, you can see car drag scenes on a flat surface, off-road (where the friction is gonna' be less compared to rubberised roads  Q: How do they not get hurt when they hit rocks or obstructions in the road? A: it can be easiy performed with necessary protective gear and by a trained stunt man  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: When they are tied to the back of a vehicle how are their arms not hurt from being pulled?
Output: they wear protective gear like lunatic vests
CONTEXT: It looks like you're asking about the 1980 Stanley Kubrick movie. In that movie it's not clearly defined the exact location of the hotel. However we are given a few facts to narrow down the location: The Overlook is located somewhere in the Colorado Rockies. The Overlook is 25 miles from the nearest town; Sidewinder. Sidewinder however is a fictional town, so this doesn't provide any real help narrowing down the Overlook's location. (Thanks to Raidri for providing this information). The Overlook is within driving distance from Boulder Colorado (where The family is staying prior to going to the Overlook).  <sep>  Q: Where is The Shining set? A: The Overlook is located somewhere in the Colorado Rockies  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there a specific city or town?
Output: The Overlook is 25 miles from the nearest town; Sidewinder. Sidewinder however is a fictional town
CONTEXT: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted, it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques. What Freddie's trying to concede here is that he did his best work when Brian, Roger, and John were giving their input. The Munich guys were either unable or unwilling to stand up to Freddie's creativity, and so his work wasn't as good. In short, Freddie found out he is not the perfect musical force he believed he was before he went to Munich, he recognizes that he needs the rest of the band, and he's explaining why he was wrong in abandoning Queen.  <sep>  Q: Why is it a problem for Freddie if the guys from Munich did what he wanted? A: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted  Q: Why is their pushback that it was done? A: it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques  Q: Why is that a problem if it got done? A: What Freddie's trying to concede here is that he did his best work when Brian, Roger, and John were giving their input  Q: Then why didn't they give their input? A: The Munich guys were either unable or unwilling to stand up to Freddie's creativity, and so his work wasn't as good  Q: How do they fix this? A: In short, Freddie found out he is not the perfect musical force he believed he was before he went to Munich  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How is Freddie able to get back to being a good musician?
Output: he recognizes that he needs the rest of the band, and he's explaining why he was wrong in abandoning Queen
CONTEXT: The biggest reason is that they weren't prepared for an attack. The Lannister army wasn't supposed to be there, but rather defending King's Landing and Casterly Rock. Lady Tyrell even goes on to say that fighting was never really the Tyrell's strong suit, so in-universe it wasn't a surprise that they fell so quickly. Also, wealth doesn't equate to army size. Just because the Tyrell's have a lot of money doesn't mean that they have a huge army. In fact, house Lannister is in significant debt because of it's huge army and all of the fighting they've had to do over the last few years.  <sep>  Q: How was a powerful house so easily defeated? A: The biggest reason is that they weren't prepared for an attack  Q: In GOT season 7 episode 3, we see the Lannister army invade and defeat house Tyrell in Highgarden. The fight was so one-sided A: The Lannister army wasn't supposed to be there, but rather defending King's Landing and Casterly Rock  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Its established in season 7 episode 1 that the Lannister army is running short of supplies and money and house Tyrell richest house in Westeros.
Output: Also, wealth doesn't equate to army size. Just because the Tyrell's have a lot of money doesn't mean that they have a huge army
CONTEXT: Many reviews are calling this a black comedy or dark comedy, which is comedy that makes light of a serious subject or a comedy with gloomy or disturbing elements. If this film was just a drama, it would be a serious depiction of four girls going on spring break and the tragedy that unfolded when they got mixed up with a gangster. Instead, there are pink ski masks, bikinis in court, lots of sex, references to Britney Spears, the mere existence of a drug dealer named Alien who shows up to bail the girls out of jail... The basic premise is ridiculous, and the way that violence is interspersed with this ridiculousness sets up an uncomfortable edge that seems to keep audiences talking about this movie. Mostly the characters are flat and the story is not that gripping, but the edge that Harmony Korinne keeps the audience on - never knowing which direction it would go - seems to keep viewers engaged, whether they are engrossed or repelled.  <sep>  Q: How exactly is the movie a comedy? A: reviews are calling this a black comedy or dark comedy  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is a dark comedy?
Output: comedy that makes light of a serious subject or a comedy with gloomy or disturbing elements
CONTEXT: He was talking about the entire source code project (getting in someone else's body) and trying to explain to her what was really going on to make her understand/help him. As he realizes his actions might seem strange, he tries to convince her to go with it. She dismisses it as it doesn't seem important (only dreams) and flirts with him  <sep>  Q: What does the conversation mean? A: He was talking about the entire source code project (getting in someone else's body) and trying to explain to her what was really going on to make her understand/help him  Q: Was she weirded out that she was in his dreams? A: She dismisses it as it doesn't seem important (only dreams) and flirts with him  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What are his intentions with the conversation?
Output: As he realizes his actions might seem strange, he tries to convince her to go with it
CONTEXT: Yes, it is very realistic. While ADHD seems to be about kids who have excess energy, what it really is about is the focus and concentration. ADHD is caused because the areas of the brain that control focus and concentration are UNDER-stimulated or under-activated. So, taking a stimulant, for those with ADHD, actually activates/enervates those portions of the brain. It seems to "calm" the afflicted child or adult, but what it's really doing is allowing them to focus their efforts and energy. Now, to someone who does not have under-stimulated brain function in the area of focus and control, it just has the general, overall stimulative effect because it is a stimulant, after all.  <sep>  Q: Realism of the effect of ADHD medicine in Desperate Housewives? A: it is very realistic. While ADHD seems to be about kids who have excess energy, what it really is about is the focus and concentration  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does it have the effect that the show shows on LInette who does not have ADHD?
Output: to someone who does not have under-stimulated brain function in the area of focus and control, it just has the general, overall stimulative effect because it is a stimulant, after all
CONTEXT: These days it is more common for people to 'buy' themselves a credit on TV and film productions through financial backing, sponsorship or other enabling methods. Traditionally (at least on film), the executive producer(s) coughed up the money to get the production rolling - they generally wouldn't have any other impact on the production. Of course, there are a few horror stories about executive producers only providing finances on the proviso that their terrible niece got a role, or they could sit in on the set (and interfere). In the case of AGT, I suspect that this roster of EPs is made up mostly of financial backers.  <sep>  Q: Why does America's Got Talent have so many executive producers? A: Traditionally (at least on film), the executive producer(s) coughed up the money to get the production rolling  Q: Do they have anything to do with making the show? A: These days it is more common for people to 'buy' themselves a credit on TV  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are they all the same type of producer?
Output: I suspect that this roster of EPs is made up mostly of financial backers
CONTEXT: I agree with @Paulster2 - just to make you laugh while scratching your head. But I want to add that Billy comes back to the classroom while the teacher is performing a tortured dance of anguish, so I think the paste on her face is just another level of her psychosis. Adam Sandler thinks it's funny to show that a sweet Kindergarten teacher has this troubled psychological condition underneath it all. (And I remember laughing at the paste on the face, so I must think it's funny too!)  <sep>  Q: Why does the teacher put paste on her face? A: the paste on her face is just another level of her psychosis  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: There is a strange scene and the scene ends right after she does this.
Output: just to make you laugh while scratching your head
CONTEXT: Since becoming the Three Eyed Raven, Bran has the ability to remember, well, everything that's ever happened in Westeros, including how he fell from the tower (although given that Sam was able to tell him some, ahem, surprising news, it seems that he doesn't just "know" everything in the past). Bran also has a habit of repeating things he never could have heard people say, just as a subtle way of saying "just so you know, I know". As he throws Bran from the window, Jaime quips to Cersei, "The things I do for love". When Bran paraphrases this line back to Jaime while staring him in the eye in S8e2, it becomes clear to Jaime that Bran knows what happened. He does something similar with Littlefinger, quoting "chaos is a ladder" at him, despite it being impossible for him to have heard the original conversation.  <sep>  Q: When does Bran Stark remember Jaime pushing him? A: Since becoming the Three Eyed Raven, Bran has the ability to remember  Q: What does he remember exactly? A: everything that's ever happened in Westeros, including how he fell from the tower (although given that Sam was able to tell him some, ahem, surprising news  Q: How can he remember everything that has ever happened? A: Bran also has a habit of repeating things he never could have heard people say  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So how does Jamie discover that Brian remembers all things?
Output: it becomes clear to Jaime that Bran knows what happened
CONTEXT: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real. So the ones communicating with Neo know how to do this. I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo. So I guess this was not them being cheap rather than trying to stress this 'supernatural' element of the one behind the messages.  <sep>  Q: Why wasn't Neo's monitor connected to anything? A: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there any symbolism involved here?
Output: I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo
CONTEXT: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs! The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked. Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for! Equally, the SOE need Vatan to keep Marianne in place while they identify her handler...another reason not to shoot him.  <sep>  Q: Why S.O.E official didn't shoot Max Vatan for not allowing him to investigate Marianne? A: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs  Q: What do they shoot people for? A: The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is he ever attacked?
Output: Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for
CONTEXT: The wiki states that the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds" that would close/collapse quickly after forming, and that only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create. Presumably the "demo dogs" are too weak to make portals like this, which is why they dig the tunnels instead.  <sep>  Q: Why is the portal so hard to close in Stranger Things 2, when the monster opened many in the first season? A: the smaller portals were inter-dimensional "wounds  Q: So what makes them easier to close? A: would close/collapse quickly after forming  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who made these portals?
Output: only the Demogorgon could make them because they took a lot of energy to create
CONTEXT: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix. One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions. Kid from Kid's Story shows up in Reloaded, but becomes important in Revolutions, when he helps save people during the Battle of Zion. The story itself takes place between The Matrix and Reloaded. There is no spoilers for Reloaded or Revolutions in any of the 9 short films.  <sep>  Q: How does Animatrix fit into the Matrix movies world? A: The Animatrix has both prequel stories, as well as concurrent stories to the Matrix  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else does it add to the main storyline?
Output: One of the stories even becomes explicitly canon when the protagonist of it becomes a minor but important character in Revolutions
CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair.  <sep>  Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter  Q: Does Fitts have a gun? A: Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier  Q: Why did he shoot him? A: Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover  Q: Why was that a problem? A: You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Were they actually lovers?
Output: In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair
CONTEXT: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together that indicated Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know. Low quality clip from "Before the Three Hour Tour:"  <sep>  Q: What is Gilligan's full name? A: Willy Gilligan  Q: When was that told to the audience? A: When the first season of "Gilligan's Island" was released on DVD in 2004, it included a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour  Q: What else was revealed during that documentary? A: Gilligan's full name was to be: "Willy Gilligan." Schwarz purposely dropped that from the finished product. So, in the official "Gilligan's Island" universe, we never know  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else I should know?
Output: a short documentary called "Before the Three Hour Tour." That piece featured materials from Sherwood Schwarz's first attempt to put the show together
CONTEXT: It is the first episode of the first season. Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run. It is likely that they had him with a notebook at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory.  <sep>  Q: Why does Reid scribble into his notebook `Extreme Aggressor` A: at first and later determined that it didn't make sense for him to have a notebook because of his eidetic memory  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do they address why he has a notebook?
Output: Typically actors, writers, directors, etc are still getting a feel for the characters early in a show's run
CONTEXT: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything, and he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event. Being a super intelligent meta human, it wouldn't be outrageous to think he calculated how and what powers each of the bus metas were going to get.  <sep>  Q: Does the Thinker know about the power of metas he created? A: As far as I know, the Thinker himself proclaimed the fact that he has answers to almost anything  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Okay, but when he created 12 different metas did he know the powers of each one?
Output: he knows all the possible future outcomes of any event
CONTEXT: He did not go to any teachers about doing "lines with that special quill". Actually, Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go. (I looked for a clip, but could not find one. All the searches go directly to Harry and Umbridge.) Hermione then says that it is simple (a clear-cut case for which any teacher would act on behalf of the student). But Harry says something to the effect that whatever it is, it is not simple. And then he walks away. In the book, it's Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge. Then Ron suggests doing to Dumbledore. But Harry is upset with Dumbledore because he has refused to speak with Harry for the longest time. McGonagall does have a confrontation with Umbridge much later in the story, and for different reasons.  <sep>  Q: Did Harry Potter tell Professor McGonagall about Umbridge's punishment? A: Ron that tells Harry that he should seek assistance from McGonagall. Harry retorts that he is not certain if she had enough pull to defy Umbridge  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Harry go to anyone else?
Output: Hermione suggested that Harry go to Dumbledore, but Harry said he would not go
CONTEXT: I think Gus' initial plan was to sweeten the deal enough for Walt to become his chemist. While extremely distrustful of him to begin with because of Jesse, Gus takes a risk and accepts Walt into his trade and even gives him the lab at the behest of Gale encouraging Gus that purity means more money. Assuming everything went smoothly and certain events didn't occur, it is plausible that even after learning Walt's connection to Hank that it would still be beneficial to Gus to keep him on as long as he survived due to the extra money Gus could make and the monetary incentive for Walt. Judging by the series as a whole, Gus only intended death for Walt after he ran over his dealers, breaking the peace to save Jesse's life, who was still considered a lowly junkie by Gus.  <sep>  Q: Was Gus planning to kill Walt from the start? A: Gus only intended death for Walt after he ran over his dealers  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did he run over his dealers?
Output: breaking the peace to save Jesse's life, who was still considered a lowly junkie by Gus
CONTEXT: Ricin is extremely toxic. It has an LD50 (the lethal dose for 50% of people exposed) of 30–40mg per kilogram when ingested (its much much more dangerous when introduced to the body in other ways). Guessing Lydia's weight at around 50kg (110 lbs) would lead one to think the LD50 would be no more than 2g of ricin. It has a military-developed antidote, which has had only limited trials in humans. Ricin is a chemical subject to the Chemical Weapons Convention, in the same schedule as nerve agents Sarin and VX. (All this information gleaned from Wikipedia) Walt also only told her when she'd already begun to experience symptoms, so less likely to recover even if treated. Even if she sought attention and gave them this information it seems unlikely that she would recover. Even if she's not been given a lethal dose, survivors of ricin often suffer from long term organ damage, so she would have a pretty miserable and presumably shortened life even if she does survive. I think Walt probably weighed her slim improved chances of survival, against the pleasure of knowing that she was aware who had done this to her. I considered an answer like @Keen's too — perhaps she would not go to a hospital in fear of the attention, but I think this is less likely, even the risk averse would put fear of death above prison.  <sep>  Q: What is ricin? A: Ricin is a chemical subject to the Chemical Weapons Convention, in the same schedule as nerve agents Sarin and VX  Q: Could Lydia get medical help and survive a ricin poisoning? A: Even if she sought attention and gave them this information it seems unlikely that she would recover  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Walter want Lydia to survive?
Output: I think Walt probably weighed her slim improved chances of survival, against the pleasure of knowing that she was aware who had done this to her
CONTEXT: As at the end of Revenge of the Sith, Yoda is the one who teaches to Obi-Wan how to come back as a "Force ghost" (himself learning it from Qui-Gon), so it is possible that he comes back this way /!\ Warning, Spoiler about The Force Awakens /!\ Yoda isn't in the movie  <sep>  Q: Did Yoda appear in Star Wars The Force awakens? A: it is possible that he comes back this way  Q: Is he one of the main characters? A: is  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What happens to him in The Force Awakens?
Output: Yoda isn't in the movie
CONTEXT: According to the narrative of the program, it seems that Walter White is dead. However, if one looks at how he was wounded it is conceivable that he wouldn't have died from the wound that he received and that he simply became unconscious at the end of the episode. While an M-60 fires a 7.62 (.30 cal) round, its bullets are copper jacket military rounds. These rounds don't expand and often inflict non-fatal wounds if they don't strike major organs or blood vessels. As demonstrated in the episode "Felina", the series denouement, Walter isn't struck directly by a rounds but is hit by a ricochet. This could cause a serious injury and perhaps an incapacitating one; however death seems to be a stretch. Assuming that Walt's injury (on his lower right side) could have struck his liver or his renal artery and thus caused him to bleed out internally. Unfortunately, such a wound would have made it impossible for him to have walked out of the neo-Nazi's hideout and around for what would have been at least ten minutes. Given that the police shown to have arrived within seconds of Walt's collapse, he could have easily been saved if paramedics had been called. The series states that Walter White is dead. The injury that he received could have been easily survivable.  <sep>  Q: Is Walter White dead? A: According to the narrative of the program, it seems that Walter White is dead  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: BUT it only showed gum on floor they did not bury hum
Output: The series states that Walter White is dead. The injury that he received could have been easily survivable
CONTEXT: Supernatural is inspired from several folk lore, legends, myths and a creative team. So most of it is born out of the existing myths out there. Of course, the team goes on to make some stuff of their own. The thing is, Supernatural borrows from myths all over the world. The salt thing and devil's trap are myths that exist. Though I wouldn't worry about the series being credible because they often involve plots that throw you off your screen like the Horsemen, heaven, hell etc etc. Just enjoy the show! :)  <sep>  Q: Is there any credibility to the "details" in Supernatural? A: Supernatural is inspired from several folk lore, legends, myths and a creative team  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What folk lore, legends and myths is it inspired by?
Output: existing myths out there
CONTEXT: Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones) witnessed the death of Agent J's (Will Smith) father, who was killed by an alien in an act that could have been prevented by Agent K. Considering the time travel elements of the third movie, and the fact that Agent K from the past was aware of his future after Agent J told him, he has essentially lived with the fact that the father of one of his only friends in the universe died because of his own failures. Since the "past" elements of the movie took place in 1969, this means he's lived with this memory for some 40 years.  <sep>  Q: What happened to Agent K to make him so grumpy and emotionless? A: Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones) witnessed the death of Agent J's (Will Smith) father  Q: So how did Agent J's father die? A: was killed by an alien in an act that could have been prevented by Agent K  Q: Oh, so do you think that he was stoical and cranky because he felt guilty about that? A: he has essentially lived with the fact that the father of one of his only friends in the universe died because of his own failures  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Wow, so does Agent J know this is how his father dies?
Output: Considering the time travel elements of the third movie, and the fact that Agent K from the past was aware of his future after Agent J told him
CONTEXT: I have Walter Mitty on vudu, and it does not have the first ending you mention, only the second happier ending. Interestingly, I can think of a movie that has the exact ending you mentioned, starring Brendan Fraser, called Bedazzled. In it, the protagonist is in love with a woman from work, he is granted several wishes by Elizabeth Hurley as the Devil and all of them are based around this woman but go disastrously wrong, and in the end asks out his co-worker who politely declines as she is in a relationship. The movie ends with him meeting a new neighbor that he begins dating.  <sep>  Q: Does "Secret Life of Walter Mitty" have two endings? A: it does not have the first ending you mention, only the second happier ending  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the real ending?
Output: The movie ends
CONTEXT: As a writing device, it's far funnier to let the viewers imagination run away with the wild descriptions that Howard gives. Additionally, by not showing Howards mother, the writers are able to characterize and describe her any way they like, without having to find an actor who lives up to that description. Howard repeatedly describes his mother as having no neck, facial-hair that needs to be removed, and at one point, it was mentioned that she wears a wig. Howards mother is essentially a charicature of an overbearing, overprotective, troubled but caring, single-parent. Now imagine if we were to actually see Mrs. Wolowitz's reactions when Howard yells at her. Perhaps we would start to feel uncomfortable witnessing this coddled, well-off guy in his 20's, yelling at this morbidly obese, lonely woman. By not showing his mother, the audience can separate the charicature of the woman from the far less funny "reality."  <sep>  Q: Why is Howard Wolowitz' mother not shown in The Big Bang Theory? A: As a writing device  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What Is a writing device?
Output: far funnier to let the viewers imagination run away with the wild descriptions that Howard gives
CONTEXT: Because it is not the name she was given or known by in DCEU. Amazons call her Diana. Steve gives her name Diana Prince when they went to assembly. This name is used by everyone else later. However the name Wonder Woman is only for audience. There is another thing that nobody knows this name of her. We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet.  <sep>  Q: Is Wonder Woman even a Wonder Woman in DC Extended Universe? A: We only see the logo WW on Lex Luthor file, so maybe he gave her that name, but nobody knows it except him yet  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you know who plays her character?
Output: in DCEU
CONTEXT: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion. Even if Ottway kills the Alpha, will the rest of the pack let him survive? If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured. Ottway's head is resting on top of the wolf's body. Since both are so badly injured, I think it's unlikely that either one of them will survive.  <sep>  Q: What happened at the end of The Grey? A: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion  Q: Oh Well did Ottway fdie or survive A: If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh Ok so 3whsat happened at ther end?
Output: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion
CONTEXT: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground, and the background appears to move quicker thanks to the simple fact that it's further away. The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films. In fact, the inclusion of that shot in Hot Fuzz is a direct reference to Michael Bay - Bad Boys II (directed by Bay) is bought up earlier on in the film, and if I remember correctly, the shot in question is actually shown to the audience while Nicholas Angel and Danny watch the film at Danny's house.  <sep>  Q: What is this camera effect used in Hot Fuzz? A: The Michael Bay Spin I'm joking, but as far as I can tell the technique doesn't really have a name. All that's happening is that the camera is moving around subjects in the foreground  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Have you seen this used before?
Output: The reason I refer to it as the Michael Bay Spin is that director Michael Bay has used this exact shot (with different actors/locations, of course) in a lot of his films
CONTEXT: I don't have a source but I am fairly certain, Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion. Then the question comes, why did Unsullied let Jon through. We saw in S08E05 that Tyrion managed to see Jaime after convincing the guarding Unsullied that he has a higher authority then the person they possibly got their orders from. They have seen Jon by her side when she's standing on King's Landing steps and proclaiming her victory and further conquest. So they know he is a close ally to her. They must have gotten their orders from Grey Worm or some other officers to guard the prisoner but when they see Jon, a close ally of Dany and a Commander of the Northern forces, they let him through because they know he has a higher authority and possibly Queen's confidence in the visit  <sep>  Q: Did the queen allow Jon to visit Tyrion? A: don't have a source but I am fairly certain  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would she allow Jon to visit though?
Output: Daenerys didn't know about Jon visiting Tyrion in the cell because of the later scene with her and Jon and her reaction to Jon asking mercy for Tyrion
CONTEXT: The people of Dark City are kept in the city in darkness. Part of the way the Strangers keep the human populous from suspecting they are part of an experiment is to keep them from realizing that fact. So, they implant them with memories of being outside the city, in the daylight, to keep them docile. Shell Beach, in particular, represents hope. Without the belief that there is something better just outside the city, the humans would likely go mad with the realization that they are stuck in an elaborate prison. Of course, since there is no actual Shell Beach, they keep the memories vague, so that everyone thinks they know where it is, but can't give clear directions. Nobody questions this because they've all been programmed by the Strangers not to -- until John Murdock comes along. John Murdock knows there's something wrong with the city, and his partial memory implant gives him glimpses of Shell Beach, which he latches onto as a means of unraveling the mysteries of the city. John lacks the programming to accept things as they are, and his questions eventually lead Bumstead, who has been programmed to be a detective, to join him. He is, in essence, looking for hope, and in the end, he must create it himself.  <sep>  Q: Why did the Strangers make up Shell Beach in human's heads when they were not even supposed to go there? A: they are part of an experiment is to keep them from realizing that fact. So, they implant them with memories of being outside the city, in the daylight, to keep them docile  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you this this is dangerous?
Output: Without the belief that there is something better just outside the city, the humans would likely go mad with the realization that they are stuck in an elaborate prison
CONTEXT: You think that a large deployment of troops would somehow be immune from the black market abundance of illicit material? Even in real life, drugs, alcohol, and illicit materials are abundant in field ops. It would not be unheard of or even unexpected for soldiers to have access to alcohol. Most of the soldiers at the base would be there voluntarily, and would not be patted down or strip searched. Put it this way, J Squads direct drill Sargent was against poker or card games and J Squad had a poker game going. Alcohol is just as easy to bring. That said, Cage had plenty of opportunities to find illicit stashes of alcohol or drugs, both on base and off. From his various loops, he obviously didn't sleep that night between waking up at the DS kicks and the moving out, and he could have found alcohol on base or off. He would have been back before deployment if he wanted. It was N+x day, where N is the number of interactions we have seen and X is the number we haven't. Cage has seen many iterations not shown in the film.  <sep>  Q: Where could Cage get alcohol on base? A: Even in real life, drugs, alcohol, and illicit materials are abundant in field ops. It would not be unheard of or even unexpected for soldiers to have access to alcohol  Q: Where could he have gotten it? A: From his various loops, he obviously didn't sleep that night between waking up at the DS kicks and the moving out, and he could have found alcohol on base or off  Q: Will he get in trouble? A: It would not be unheard of or even unexpected for soldiers to have access to alcohol  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what would happen if he was drunk during combat?
Output: Put it this way, J Squads direct drill Sargent was against poker or card games and J Squad had a poker game going. Alcohol is just as easy to bring
CONTEXT: For US Federal civilian employees, there is no prohibition against having spouses (or immediate family members) working in the same agency or even the same unit. The only prohibition is that one of them cannot be in a supervisory chain of command above the other (conflict of interest/nepotism). I'm fairly certain state agencies would have similar restrictions as well. As in any workplace setting, it depends on the culture of the agency (fictional CBI in this instance) or personalities of those involved/affected on how much coworker dating relationships are on the down-low. It can vary. Normally it's not a big deal unless a supervisor starts dating his/her subordinate or something like that. It looks like the CBI in this case prefers keep personal relationships to a minimal so that it won't adversely affect decisions out in the field. So the characters might want keep it on the DL just to avoid it coming up in office politics/rumor mill/etc.  <sep>  Q: Is it forbidden to have a relationship in CBI in reality? A: It looks like the CBI in this case prefers keep personal relationships to a minimal so that it won't adversely affect decisions out in the field  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is CBI a real thing in America or was it made up for the Mentalist?
Output: fictional CBI in this instance
CONTEXT: In Prometheus, Elizabeth Shaw and Charlie Holloway are scientific partners who are also in a relationship before the events of the movie. They discover the location of LV-223 and get the support from Weyland to fund a scientific trip. It is entirely coincidental that they are in a relationship, though of course that fact is used later in the plot. They are a couple on the ship because they are responsible for the expedition. The situation in Alien Covenant is entirely different. This is a colonization ship, a deliberate, one-way trip to settle on another planet. It is clearly deliberate that the ship is (entirely?) crewed by couples who are likely to want to settle and raise families in their destination. I don't think you can extrapolate the second example to say it is 'encouraged officially'. Its clearly encouraged, possibly a requirement for the people funding a colonization of another planet, but why would it be a general requirement? The trip in Prometheus and the later Nostromo isn't one-way and is largely crewed by single people.  <sep>  Q: Is it a coincidence that there are many couples boarding ships in Alien? A: The situation in Alien Covenant is entirely different. This is a colonization ship, a deliberate, one-way trip to settle on another planet  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I am wondering in the Alien universe, having a married couple to go onto the same trip is encouraged officially?
Output: I don't think you can extrapolate the second example to say it is 'encouraged officially'. Its clearly encouraged