niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because that is how he is remembered. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because he was a man of the world. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because "is" is present tense and indicates he is still alive. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because He is a remarkable man Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because MORE LIKELY FRED. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man still alive who remembers my great-grandfather. He was a remarkable man.
 Reason: The 'He' refers to my great-grandfather because my great-grantfather is more imporant than fred. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because He still remembers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because If Fred remembers that persons father as an infant of course he was the one that was 12 when he first saw that persons father because otherwise he would of never had been able of seen the father as an infant. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because Yes, because everything flows according to your destiny. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because he has always had the 'he' and the 'she' (and possibly the 'she'. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because in his own words, he is "a very odd man". 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because it is likely that his mother was very young when she became his father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because Fred wouldn't remember something that happened when he was twelve months old. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because Fred is older than my father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve years old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to fred because MY FATHER MORE LIKELY FRED. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because Fred wouldn't remember something that happened when he was twelve months old. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because Fred is older than my father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because The pronoun probably refers to Fred who saw someone else when he was little. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because he was still technically alive at the time. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because he was a man, but I don't know if it is the same thing. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because my mother's birth name was Fred. My mother's father's name is James. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because my father as an infant fred first saw my father. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Fred is the only man alive who still remembers my father as an infant. When Fred first saw my father, he was twelve months old.
 Reason: The 'he' refers to my father because Yes, because everything flows according to your destiny. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because Yakusk had a bigger and better army. Kamtchatka didn't. So Kamtchatka lost. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because The sentance describes who lost, and why Yakutsk had advantages. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because Yakutsk had the larger better equipped army therefore they were winners. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because defeat is more likely to the war. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because most of the fighting on the ground was done by the Soviet army. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because they are a state that is a close ally of the Soviet Union and are close to Russian borders. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because it was the first Russian army to take the war to the Yakutsk army. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because the city is so closely associated with the Soviet Union. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because Since Yakutsk's army was much better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks but July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because the bigger army would be victorious. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much better equipped. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were defeated within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to kamtchatka because YAKUTSK REFER TO KAMTCHATKA. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because Since Yakutsk's army was much better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks but July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because the bigger army would be victorious. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because Yakutsk had a better army. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because YAKUTSK REFER TO KAMTCHATKA. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because all the Soviet Union's armies in the war had been based in Yakutsk, but the '. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because of the fact that in the past, the two countries have been linked by the border and a common. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because the Russian army was deployed in the Komi republic of the south of the country. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because most of the military equipment was shipped to Yakutsk. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because of the region's historic ties to Russia. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because The sentance describes who lost, and why Yakutsk had advantages. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: In July, Kamtchatka declared war on Yakutsk. Since Yakutsk's army was much  better equipped and ten times larger, they were victorious within weeks.
 Reason: The 'they' refers to yakutsk because Yakutsk had the larger better equipped army therefore they were winners. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because its swimming below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because The minnow is the one likely to be in danger compared to the duck and the one in need of going away to safety. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because The duck is threatened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because Duck was above minnow as minnow was swimming below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because Safety is better in Swimming right below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because it can swim, but it has never been seen before. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because it is the biggest of the bunch, and it has to be moved away from the other ducks in. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because there is a long line of minnows in the water. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because The shark swims below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because The duck is the one most likely to be at risk in this situation making it likely they would need to get to safety. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because the duck get away from the shark. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because The duck needs speed for get escape from shark. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a minnow swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the minnow because sharks eat ducks. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because The duck is the one most likely to be at risk in this situation making it likely they would need to get to safety. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because the duck get away from the shark. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because The duck needs speed for get escape from shark. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because sharks eat ducks. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because it has a shark on it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because it is a duck, and the 'shark' is likely to refer to the duck because it. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because its swimming below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because The minnow is the one likely to be in danger compared to the duck and the one in need of going away to safety. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because The duck is threatened. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Look! There is a shark swimming right below that duck! It had better get away to safety fast!
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the duck because Safety is better in Swimming right below the duck. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because The archaeologists are the one that would be hunting for evidence. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because archaeologists are the one doing the research so they are the ones hunting for evidence. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because The early humans would not have been hunting for evidence about themselves. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because Because Archaeologists were te ones looking for the evidence. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because the people of the city were clearly not 'them' - they were only the Laputians. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because the site is located only about a mile or so from the site of Laputa. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because they found the remains of a 'lion'. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because they have discovered a new type of stone tool, the 'Laputa Stone', which will be. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because they are the ones who did the digging. We have a lot of evidence from their excavations. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because Archaeologists wouldn't likely be the ones hunting for deer. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because 20000 years ago,deer hunting was the main source of food. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for evidence on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to archaeologists because the red should refer to the humans. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because Humans is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because 20000 years ago,deer hunting was the main source of food. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because the archaelogists did research. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because they hunted for their meat and their fur. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because there's a connection between the Laputa people and Prehistoric humans. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because they were the first species to use fire, making this the earliest known example of fire-based technology. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because they were found to be using the same technology as our ancestors. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: Archaeologists have concluded that humans lived in Laputa 20,000 years ago. They hunted for deer on the river banks.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to prehistoric humans because they were likely to have lived in an area known as the 'Theyan Valley' in the early. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because The fish were being studied; the scientists were doing the studying which would have began two years ago. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because Scientists make studies not fish. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because the researchers are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because The fish is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because they are recently found. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They began two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the scientists because fish that have recently been fpounding two years ago. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They appeared two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the fish because The fish would  be the subject of the study and would have appeared to years ago. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They appeared two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the fish because fish that have recently been fpounding two years ago. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They appeared two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the fish because they are found in very deep water. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They appeared two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the fish because of their similarity in colouration, which suggests they are part of the same group. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The scientists are studying three species of fish that have recently been found living in the Indian Ocean. They appeared two years ago.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the fish because The scientists is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because journalists are persistent in interviewing. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because The journalists would be persistent with questions. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time but The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because No, the red pronoun refers to the journalist who wouldn't stop asking questions. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because they were also interested in the new movie.I'll get back to the 'They' later. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because they have been talking to multiple sources, and the 'they' refers to the press. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because they were the ones who wanted to take the time to interview the actors. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because they are the ones who are trying to answer the same question over and over again. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because The leading sentance is based on the movie starts, second sentence is a follow up. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because cooperative is more likely to the interview. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the journalists because Yakutsk's army was much better equipped and ten times larger. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because The journalists wanted to interview the stars. The stars had a choice. The stars agreed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because The leading sentance is based on the movie starts, second sentence is a follow up. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because The starts were the ones that were cooperative being interviewed. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because cooperative is more likely to the interview. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because Yakutsk's army was much better equipped and ten times larger. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because they are the movie's producers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because their names are on the movie poster. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because they have to be present for the interview to take place. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because the stars were persistent so that the interview lasted for a long time. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because The journalists would be persistent with questions. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because They were very persistent, so the interview lasted for a long time but The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The journalists interviewed the stars of the new movie. They were very cooperative, so the interview lasted for a long time.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the stars because No, the red pronoun refers to the journalist who wouldn't stop asking questions. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because The police would be stopping the drug trade, the gang would not. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because The gang members is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because gang members don't stop drug trading. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because the police trying to stop the drug trade. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because they, refers to the police because all the actions are done by them. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because they were the ones who arrested the gang members. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because they were not able to arrest the gang members in the course of the operation. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because the alleged gang members were arrested. The 'They' also referred to the neighborhood. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because a lot of people in the neighborhood are under arrest. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because the group was not officially affiliated with any group. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because gangsters run drug trade. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to stop the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the police because the red should refer to the gang members. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because gangsters run drug trade. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood  because the police arrested all of the gang members. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because the police took action. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because gangsters are more likely to run drug trade than the police. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because the police arrested all of the gang members. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because they are the main target of the ongoing investigation. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because they are also called the 'Mafiosi. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because the police have been working to find them. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because The gang members is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: The police arrested all of the gang members. They were trying to run the drug trade in the neighborhood.
 Reason: The 'They' refers to the gang members because they, refers to the police because all the actions are done by them. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because butter is an ingredient of cakes. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because eating the cake. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because I wanted it to be a cake, not a slice of cake. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because it is a cake – but this could be a reference to the cake being a metaphor for a person. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because it has a rich, rich flavor. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because it's so thin from the butter. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because it's a cake. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because The cake is referred to as the pronoun here a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because refrigerators is where we save food,so it may have leftovers. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of butter in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the cake because stored cake in refrigerator. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Wrong
Sentence: I put the cake away in the refrigerator. It has a lot of leftovers in it.
 Reason: The 'It' refers to the refrigerator because A Refrigerator would have leftovers in it not the cake. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
Output: Correct