niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: How many years was there between the nationwide boycott and the decision of Loewe v. Lawlor?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: What did Lawlor do?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: What did Sherman Antitrust Act prohibit?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: What did the Clayton Act do?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: What event happened first, the U.S. Supreme Court deciding Loewe v. Lawlor, or the Hatters' union instituting a nationwide boycott?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Which Act happened last, the Clayton act, or the Norris-La Guardia Act?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Which act came second the Norris-La Guardia Act or the Clayton Act?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Which event happened first, the decision of Loewe vs. Lawlor, or the boycott of hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Who did Loewe collect damages from?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Who did Loewe sue?
Passage: In 1908 the U.S. Supreme Court decided Loewe v. Lawlor . In 1902 the Hatters' Union instituted a nationwide boycott of the hats made by a nonunion company in Connecticut. Owner Dietrich Loewe brought suit against the union for unlawful combinations to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court ruled that the union was subject to an injunction and liable for the payment of triple damages. In 1915 Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the Court, again decided in favor of Loewe, upholding a lower federal court ruling ordering the union to pay damages of $252,130. . This was not a typical case in which a few union leaders were punished with short terms in jail; specifically, the life savings of several hundreds of the members were attached. The lower court ruling established a major precedent, and became a serious issue for the unions. The Clayton Act of 1914 presumably exempted unions from the antitrust prohibition and established for the first time the Congressional principle that "the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". However, judicial interpretation so weakened it that prosecutions of labor under the antitrust acts continued until the enactment of the Norris-La Guardia Act in 1932.
Output: Who won the 1908 Supreme Court case Loewe v. Lawlor?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Are more Hispanics in Stanislaus County Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Guatemalan?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many African Americans and Asians were there combined?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many more Asians were there compared with Native Americans?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many of the 514453 people living in Stanislaus County were non-white?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many people in Stanislaus County were not of Hispanic or Latino decent?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many people in the county were not Hispanic or Latino?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many people in the county were not white?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many people living in Stanislaus County were not white?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of Stanislaus County is not Mexican?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people in the county were not white?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not African American?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Asian?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Cambodian?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Chinese?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Filipino?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Hispanic?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Indian?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Native American?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Pacific Islander?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not Vietnamese?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not vietnamese?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent of people were not white?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent were not Filipino?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: How many percent were not Korean?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Of the group considered Asian, what was the largest subgroup?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Of the group considered Asian, what was the smallest subgroup?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Were there fewer people in the county that were Salvadoran or Nicaraguan?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Were there more African American or Native Americans?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Were there more African Americans or Native Americans in the county?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Were there more Asians or Native Americans in Stanislaus County in 2010?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Which groups made up between 2% and 5% of the population?
Passage: The 2010 United States Census reported that Stanislaus County had a population of 514,453. The racial makeup of Stanislaus County was 337,342 (65.6%) White (U.S. Census), 14,721 (2.9%) African American (U.S. Census), 5,902 (1.1%) Native American (U.S. Census), 26,090 (5.1%) Asian (U.S. Census) (1.5% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.7% Cambodian, 0.5% Chinese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.3% Laotian, 0.1% Japanese, 0.1% Korean, 0.1% Cambodian), 3,401 (0.7%) Pacific Islander (U.S. Census), 99,210 (19.3%) from Race (United States Census), and 27,787 (5.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) of any race were 215,658 persons (41.9%); 37.6% of Stanislaus County is Mexican, 0.6% Puerto Rican, 0.5% Salvadoran, 0.2% Nicaraguan, and 0.2% Guatemalan.
Output: Which racial groups made up the top two in the county?
Passage: Some hint of Cnut's childhood can be found in the Flateyjarbók, a 13th-century source that says he was taught his soldiery by the chieftain Thorkell the Tall, brother to Sigurd, Jarl of mythical Jomsborg, and the legendary Joms, at their Viking stronghold on the island of Wollin, off the coast of Pomerania. His date of birth, like his mother's name, is unknown. Contemporary works such as the Chronicon and the Encomium Emmae, do not mention this. Even so, in a Knútsdrápa by the skald Óttarr svarti, there is a statement that Cnut was "of no great age" when he first went to war. It also mentions a battle identifiable with Sweyn Forkbeard's invasion of England and attack on the city of Norwich, in 1003/04, after the St. Brice's Day massacre of Danes by the English, in 1002. If Cnut indeed accompanied this expedition, his birthdate may be near 990, or even 980. If not, and if the skald's poetic verse references another assault, such as Forkbeard's conquest of England in 1013/14, it may even suggest a birth date nearer 1000. There is a passage of the Encomiast  with a reference to the force Cnut led in his English conquest of 1015/16. Here  it says all the Vikings were of "mature age" under Cnut "the king". A description of Cnut appears in the 13th-century Knýtlinga saga:.
Output: Besides Thorkell who else taught Cnut his soldiery?
Passage: Some hint of Cnut's childhood can be found in the Flateyjarbók, a 13th-century source that says he was taught his soldiery by the chieftain Thorkell the Tall, brother to Sigurd, Jarl of mythical Jomsborg, and the legendary Joms, at their Viking stronghold on the island of Wollin, off the coast of Pomerania. His date of birth, like his mother's name, is unknown. Contemporary works such as the Chronicon and the Encomium Emmae, do not mention this. Even so, in a Knútsdrápa by the skald Óttarr svarti, there is a statement that Cnut was "of no great age" when he first went to war. It also mentions a battle identifiable with Sweyn Forkbeard's invasion of England and attack on the city of Norwich, in 1003/04, after the St. Brice's Day massacre of Danes by the English, in 1002. If Cnut indeed accompanied this expedition, his birthdate may be near 990, or even 980. If not, and if the skald's poetic verse references another assault, such as Forkbeard's conquest of England in 1013/14, it may even suggest a birth date nearer 1000. There is a passage of the Encomiast  with a reference to the force Cnut led in his English conquest of 1015/16. Here  it says all the Vikings were of "mature age" under Cnut "the king". A description of Cnut appears in the 13th-century Knýtlinga saga:.
Output: How many contemporary works are mentioned that fail to mention Cnut's birth date?
Passage: Some hint of Cnut's childhood can be found in the Flateyjarbók, a 13th-century source that says he was taught his soldiery by the chieftain Thorkell the Tall, brother to Sigurd, Jarl of mythical Jomsborg, and the legendary Joms, at their Viking stronghold on the island of Wollin, off the coast of Pomerania. His date of birth, like his mother's name, is unknown. Contemporary works such as the Chronicon and the Encomium Emmae, do not mention this. Even so, in a Knútsdrápa by the skald Óttarr svarti, there is a statement that Cnut was "of no great age" when he first went to war. It also mentions a battle identifiable with Sweyn Forkbeard's invasion of England and attack on the city of Norwich, in 1003/04, after the St. Brice's Day massacre of Danes by the English, in 1002. If Cnut indeed accompanied this expedition, his birthdate may be near 990, or even 980. If not, and if the skald's poetic verse references another assault, such as Forkbeard's conquest of England in 1013/14, it may even suggest a birth date nearer 1000. There is a passage of the Encomiast  with a reference to the force Cnut led in his English conquest of 1015/16. Here  it says all the Vikings were of "mature age" under Cnut "the king". A description of Cnut appears in the 13th-century Knýtlinga saga:.
Output: How many contemporary works are mentioned that fail to mentioned Cnut's birth?
Passage: Some hint of Cnut's childhood can be found in the Flateyjarbók, a 13th-century source that says he was taught his soldiery by the chieftain Thorkell the Tall, brother to Sigurd, Jarl of mythical Jomsborg, and the legendary Joms, at their Viking stronghold on the island of Wollin, off the coast of Pomerania. His date of birth, like his mother's name, is unknown. Contemporary works such as the Chronicon and the Encomium Emmae, do not mention this. Even so, in a Knútsdrápa by the skald Óttarr svarti, there is a statement that Cnut was "of no great age" when he first went to war. It also mentions a battle identifiable with Sweyn Forkbeard's invasion of England and attack on the city of Norwich, in 1003/04, after the St. Brice's Day massacre of Danes by the English, in 1002. If Cnut indeed accompanied this expedition, his birthdate may be near 990, or even 980. If not, and if the skald's poetic verse references another assault, such as Forkbeard's conquest of England in 1013/14, it may even suggest a birth date nearer 1000. There is a passage of the Encomiast  with a reference to the force Cnut led in his English conquest of 1015/16. Here  it says all the Vikings were of "mature age" under Cnut "the king". A description of Cnut appears in the 13th-century Knýtlinga saga:.
Output: How many years difference is there between the earliest and latest speculated birthdates of Cnut?