niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Passage: Matthias and Frederick III/V had been rivals stretching back to Matthias' succession as King of Hungary in 1458 after the early death of Frederick's Habsburg cousin King Ladislaus the Posthumous. At this time, Frederick held the Holy Crown of Hungary and was a candidate for becoming Hungarian king himself. Matthias, backed by the Bohemian king George of Poděbrady whose daughter Catherine  he married in 1461, finally prevailed: the two rivals settled their disagreements in 1463 with the Treaty of Wiener Neustadt, in which Frederick recognized the de facto King of Hungary and returned the Holy Crown to Matthias for a heavy ransom. With the consent of Pope Paul II, Matthias invaded Moravia in 1468, instigating the Bohemian War with his former ally George of Poděbrad, on the pretext of protecting Catholicism against the Hussite movement - in fact to depose his father-in-law King George. Welcomed by the German nobility in Silesia and the Lusatias, as well as by the Catholic Czechs in Moravia, Matthias acquired these territories for himself and in 1469 pronounced himself Bohemian king in Olomouc. Never able to seize the capital Prague however, Matthias' war would drag on with Poděbrad's successor, the Polish prince Vladislaus Jagiellon, until the latter recognized Matthias' gains in the 1478 Treaty of Brno. Emperor Frederick, at the same time stuck in the France-Habsburg rivalry over the Burgundian succession with King Louis XI of France, had initially assisted Matthias against the Hussites in the Bohemian War. Contributing very little however, Frederick soon came to reverse his role and forged an alliance with Poděbrad's successor Vladislaus whom he enfeoffed with the Kingdom of Bohemia in 1477. Angered by this action and recalling previous insults, Matthias proceeded to press for a peace with Vladislaus and invaded Frederick's Austrian lands.
Output: Which happened first, Matthias' succession as King of Hungary or him pronouncing himself Bohemian king of Olomouc?
Passage: Matthias and Frederick III/V had been rivals stretching back to Matthias' succession as King of Hungary in 1458 after the early death of Frederick's Habsburg cousin King Ladislaus the Posthumous. At this time, Frederick held the Holy Crown of Hungary and was a candidate for becoming Hungarian king himself. Matthias, backed by the Bohemian king George of Poděbrady whose daughter Catherine  he married in 1461, finally prevailed: the two rivals settled their disagreements in 1463 with the Treaty of Wiener Neustadt, in which Frederick recognized the de facto King of Hungary and returned the Holy Crown to Matthias for a heavy ransom. With the consent of Pope Paul II, Matthias invaded Moravia in 1468, instigating the Bohemian War with his former ally George of Poděbrad, on the pretext of protecting Catholicism against the Hussite movement - in fact to depose his father-in-law King George. Welcomed by the German nobility in Silesia and the Lusatias, as well as by the Catholic Czechs in Moravia, Matthias acquired these territories for himself and in 1469 pronounced himself Bohemian king in Olomouc. Never able to seize the capital Prague however, Matthias' war would drag on with Poděbrad's successor, the Polish prince Vladislaus Jagiellon, until the latter recognized Matthias' gains in the 1478 Treaty of Brno. Emperor Frederick, at the same time stuck in the France-Habsburg rivalry over the Burgundian succession with King Louis XI of France, had initially assisted Matthias against the Hussites in the Bohemian War. Contributing very little however, Frederick soon came to reverse his role and forged an alliance with Poděbrad's successor Vladislaus whom he enfeoffed with the Kingdom of Bohemia in 1477. Angered by this action and recalling previous insults, Matthias proceeded to press for a peace with Vladislaus and invaded Frederick's Austrian lands.
Output: Who assisted Matthias against the Hussites in the Bohemian War?
Passage: Matthias and Frederick III/V had been rivals stretching back to Matthias' succession as King of Hungary in 1458 after the early death of Frederick's Habsburg cousin King Ladislaus the Posthumous. At this time, Frederick held the Holy Crown of Hungary and was a candidate for becoming Hungarian king himself. Matthias, backed by the Bohemian king George of Poděbrady whose daughter Catherine  he married in 1461, finally prevailed: the two rivals settled their disagreements in 1463 with the Treaty of Wiener Neustadt, in which Frederick recognized the de facto King of Hungary and returned the Holy Crown to Matthias for a heavy ransom. With the consent of Pope Paul II, Matthias invaded Moravia in 1468, instigating the Bohemian War with his former ally George of Poděbrad, on the pretext of protecting Catholicism against the Hussite movement - in fact to depose his father-in-law King George. Welcomed by the German nobility in Silesia and the Lusatias, as well as by the Catholic Czechs in Moravia, Matthias acquired these territories for himself and in 1469 pronounced himself Bohemian king in Olomouc. Never able to seize the capital Prague however, Matthias' war would drag on with Poděbrad's successor, the Polish prince Vladislaus Jagiellon, until the latter recognized Matthias' gains in the 1478 Treaty of Brno. Emperor Frederick, at the same time stuck in the France-Habsburg rivalry over the Burgundian succession with King Louis XI of France, had initially assisted Matthias against the Hussites in the Bohemian War. Contributing very little however, Frederick soon came to reverse his role and forged an alliance with Poděbrad's successor Vladislaus whom he enfeoffed with the Kingdom of Bohemia in 1477. Angered by this action and recalling previous insults, Matthias proceeded to press for a peace with Vladislaus and invaded Frederick's Austrian lands.
Output: Who did Polish prince Vladislaus Jagiellon replace?
Passage: Matthias and Frederick III/V had been rivals stretching back to Matthias' succession as King of Hungary in 1458 after the early death of Frederick's Habsburg cousin King Ladislaus the Posthumous. At this time, Frederick held the Holy Crown of Hungary and was a candidate for becoming Hungarian king himself. Matthias, backed by the Bohemian king George of Poděbrady whose daughter Catherine  he married in 1461, finally prevailed: the two rivals settled their disagreements in 1463 with the Treaty of Wiener Neustadt, in which Frederick recognized the de facto King of Hungary and returned the Holy Crown to Matthias for a heavy ransom. With the consent of Pope Paul II, Matthias invaded Moravia in 1468, instigating the Bohemian War with his former ally George of Poděbrad, on the pretext of protecting Catholicism against the Hussite movement - in fact to depose his father-in-law King George. Welcomed by the German nobility in Silesia and the Lusatias, as well as by the Catholic Czechs in Moravia, Matthias acquired these territories for himself and in 1469 pronounced himself Bohemian king in Olomouc. Never able to seize the capital Prague however, Matthias' war would drag on with Poděbrad's successor, the Polish prince Vladislaus Jagiellon, until the latter recognized Matthias' gains in the 1478 Treaty of Brno. Emperor Frederick, at the same time stuck in the France-Habsburg rivalry over the Burgundian succession with King Louis XI of France, had initially assisted Matthias against the Hussites in the Bohemian War. Contributing very little however, Frederick soon came to reverse his role and forged an alliance with Poděbrad's successor Vladislaus whom he enfeoffed with the Kingdom of Bohemia in 1477. Angered by this action and recalling previous insults, Matthias proceeded to press for a peace with Vladislaus and invaded Frederick's Austrian lands.
Output: Who was king first - Ladislaus or Matthias?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: How many examples of neoclassical architecture are listed?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: How many years did construction take on Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: How many years did it take to rebuild Łazienki Palace?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: How many years was there building activity at Wilanów Palace?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: What two Palaces started construction in 1677?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: Which Palace's construction took longer, Krasiński Palace or Wilanów Palace?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: Which church began construction first, St. Kazimierz Church or Visitationist Church?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: Which location did building activity begin first, Wilanów Palace or St. Kazimierz Church?
Passage: Building activity occurred in numerous noble palaces and churches during the later decades of the 17th century. Some of the best examples of this architecture are Krasiński Palace (1677-1683), Wilanów Palace (1677-1696) and St. Kazimierz Church (1688-1692). The most impressive examples of rococo architecture are Czapski Palace (1712-1721), Palace of the Four Winds (1730s) and Visitationist Church (façade 1728-1761). The neoclassical architecture in Warsaw can be described by the simplicity of the geometrical forms teamed with a great inspiration from the Roman period. Some of the best examples of the neoclassical style are the Łazienki Palace (rebuilt 1775-1795), Królikarnia (1782-1786), Carmelite Church, Warsaw (façade 1761-1783) and Evangelical Holy Trinity Church, Warsaw (1777-1782). The economic growth during the first years of Congress Poland caused a rapid rise of architecture. The Neoclassical revival affected all aspects of architecture; the most notable examples are the Great Theatre, Warsaw (1825-1833) and buildings located at Plac Bankowy, Warsaw (1825-1828).
Output: Which location did building activity last long, Krasiński Palace or Wilanów Palace?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more people spoke African at home than Chinese language?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more people spoke the second and third most common languages combined compared to the most commonly spoken language?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more percent of Bronx residents spoke Spanish than English?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more percent of Bronx residents spoke Spanish than French?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more percent of Bronx residents spoke Spanish than Italian?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many more percentage spoke Italian language at home then Indo-European?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many people in total spoke the three least common languages?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many people spoke the top 3 most common languages?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents age five and older did not speak a language other than English at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak Chinese at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak English at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak French at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak Indo-Aryan languages at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak Indo-European languages at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak Italian at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: How many percent of Bronx residents did not speak Spanish at home?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: What were all languages did the Bronx residents spoke at home more than Indo Aryan?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: Which language did the Bronx residents five and older speak the least: Spanish or English?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: Which language was spoken at home by the second largest number of Bronx residents aged five and older?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: Which languages were spoken at home by the third largest number of Bronx residents aged five and older?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: Which languages were spoken by between 11000 and 12000 people in the Bronx?
Passage: As of 2010, 46.29% (584,463) of Bronx residents aged five and older spoke Spanish language at home, while 44.02% (555,767) spoke English language, 2.48% (31,361) Languages of Africa, 0.91% (11,455) French language, 0.90% (11,355) Italian language, 0.87% (10,946) Indo-Aryan languages, 0.70% (8,836) Indo-European languages, and Chinese language was spoken at home by 0.50% (6,610) of the population over the age of five. In total, 55.98% (706,783) of the Bronxs population age five and older spoke a language at home other than English. A Garifuna language-speaking community from Honduras and Guatemala also makes the Bronx its home.
Output: Which was the second most common language?
Passage: Coming off their first loss in their last 8 games, the Patriots came to San Diego to face the 8-4 Chargers, who were on a three-game winning streak. After forcing the Chargers to punt, the Patriots put together a 17 play, 89-yard marathon drive to the Chargers 1-yard line, but on 3rd-and-goal Brady was sacked for a 7-yard loss and Shareece Wright blocked Gostkowski's 26-yard field goal attempt, but he was flagged for being offsides, and Gostkowski made a 22-yard field goal. The Chargers answered the Patriots on their next drive, marching 80 yards in 11 plays with Philip Rivers hitting Malcolm Floyd for a 15-yard touchdown to put the Chargers up 7-3. On the fourth play of the Patriots next drive, Brady threw a two-yard pass to LaFell, who was stripped by Jahleel Addae with Darrell Stuckey picking up the fumble and rumbling 53 yards for a touchdown and a 14-3 Chargers lead. The Patriots drove all the way to the Charges 4-yard line, but the Chargers defense made a stand and the Patriots settled for a 22-yard Gostkowski field goal, and the score was 14-6. After forcing a Chargers three-and-out, Bolden blockedMike Scifres' punt, knocking him out of the game, at the Chargers 25. Four plays later, Brady threw a 14-yard touchdown pass to Gronkowski, cutting the deficit to 14-13. After another Chargers punt, the Patriots drove to the Chargers 18, but Brady was intercepted by Manti Te'o at the 4, concluding a sloppy, unimpressive, first half for both offenses. Both offenses came out just as bad in the second half, resulting in a combined five consecutive 3-and-outs. Midway through the third quarter, Devin McCourty intercepted Rivers at the Patriots 44 and returned it 56 yards for a touchdown, but a helmet-to-helmet hit by Browner on Ladarius Green nullified the score. Replays showed Browner hit his shoulder, not his head, but the ruling was upheld. The break seemed to spur the Chargers to a score, as they reached Patriots territory but Rivers was intercepted by Akeem Ayers at the Patriots 30-yard line. The Patriots offense continued their cold streak by going three-and-out on their fourth straight drive, but their defense continued to shut down San Diego. A 16-yard punt return by Edelman set the Patriots up at their own 25. They marched 55 yards to the Chargers 20, and took the lead on a 38-yard Gostkowski field goal, giving the Patriot a 16-14 lead midway through the fourth quarter. After the Chargers went three-and-out for the fourth time in five drives(the lone exception ending in an interception), Brady hit Edelman on the first play of the their next drive for a 69-yard catch-and-run touchdown. The extra point made the score 23-14, sealing another Patriots win. Despite the win, the Chargers showed that the Patriots offense was still prone to mistakes. Edelman was the star, with 8 catches for 141 yards and a touchdown. The Patriots defense had a great showing, holding the Chargers to just 216 total yards, sacking Philip Rivers four times, with an interception. This loss would send the Chargers to ultimately lose three of their last four and their season.
Output: How many 22-yard field goals did Gostkowski boot?
Passage: Coming off their first loss in their last 8 games, the Patriots came to San Diego to face the 8-4 Chargers, who were on a three-game winning streak. After forcing the Chargers to punt, the Patriots put together a 17 play, 89-yard marathon drive to the Chargers 1-yard line, but on 3rd-and-goal Brady was sacked for a 7-yard loss and Shareece Wright blocked Gostkowski's 26-yard field goal attempt, but he was flagged for being offsides, and Gostkowski made a 22-yard field goal. The Chargers answered the Patriots on their next drive, marching 80 yards in 11 plays with Philip Rivers hitting Malcolm Floyd for a 15-yard touchdown to put the Chargers up 7-3. On the fourth play of the Patriots next drive, Brady threw a two-yard pass to LaFell, who was stripped by Jahleel Addae with Darrell Stuckey picking up the fumble and rumbling 53 yards for a touchdown and a 14-3 Chargers lead. The Patriots drove all the way to the Charges 4-yard line, but the Chargers defense made a stand and the Patriots settled for a 22-yard Gostkowski field goal, and the score was 14-6. After forcing a Chargers three-and-out, Bolden blockedMike Scifres' punt, knocking him out of the game, at the Chargers 25. Four plays later, Brady threw a 14-yard touchdown pass to Gronkowski, cutting the deficit to 14-13. After another Chargers punt, the Patriots drove to the Chargers 18, but Brady was intercepted by Manti Te'o at the 4, concluding a sloppy, unimpressive, first half for both offenses. Both offenses came out just as bad in the second half, resulting in a combined five consecutive 3-and-outs. Midway through the third quarter, Devin McCourty intercepted Rivers at the Patriots 44 and returned it 56 yards for a touchdown, but a helmet-to-helmet hit by Browner on Ladarius Green nullified the score. Replays showed Browner hit his shoulder, not his head, but the ruling was upheld. The break seemed to spur the Chargers to a score, as they reached Patriots territory but Rivers was intercepted by Akeem Ayers at the Patriots 30-yard line. The Patriots offense continued their cold streak by going three-and-out on their fourth straight drive, but their defense continued to shut down San Diego. A 16-yard punt return by Edelman set the Patriots up at their own 25. They marched 55 yards to the Chargers 20, and took the lead on a 38-yard Gostkowski field goal, giving the Patriot a 16-14 lead midway through the fourth quarter. After the Chargers went three-and-out for the fourth time in five drives(the lone exception ending in an interception), Brady hit Edelman on the first play of the their next drive for a 69-yard catch-and-run touchdown. The extra point made the score 23-14, sealing another Patriots win. Despite the win, the Chargers showed that the Patriots offense was still prone to mistakes. Edelman was the star, with 8 catches for 141 yards and a touchdown. The Patriots defense had a great showing, holding the Chargers to just 216 total yards, sacking Philip Rivers four times, with an interception. This loss would send the Chargers to ultimately lose three of their last four and their season.
Output: How many field goals did Gostkowski kick?
Passage: Coming off their first loss in their last 8 games, the Patriots came to San Diego to face the 8-4 Chargers, who were on a three-game winning streak. After forcing the Chargers to punt, the Patriots put together a 17 play, 89-yard marathon drive to the Chargers 1-yard line, but on 3rd-and-goal Brady was sacked for a 7-yard loss and Shareece Wright blocked Gostkowski's 26-yard field goal attempt, but he was flagged for being offsides, and Gostkowski made a 22-yard field goal. The Chargers answered the Patriots on their next drive, marching 80 yards in 11 plays with Philip Rivers hitting Malcolm Floyd for a 15-yard touchdown to put the Chargers up 7-3. On the fourth play of the Patriots next drive, Brady threw a two-yard pass to LaFell, who was stripped by Jahleel Addae with Darrell Stuckey picking up the fumble and rumbling 53 yards for a touchdown and a 14-3 Chargers lead. The Patriots drove all the way to the Charges 4-yard line, but the Chargers defense made a stand and the Patriots settled for a 22-yard Gostkowski field goal, and the score was 14-6. After forcing a Chargers three-and-out, Bolden blockedMike Scifres' punt, knocking him out of the game, at the Chargers 25. Four plays later, Brady threw a 14-yard touchdown pass to Gronkowski, cutting the deficit to 14-13. After another Chargers punt, the Patriots drove to the Chargers 18, but Brady was intercepted by Manti Te'o at the 4, concluding a sloppy, unimpressive, first half for both offenses. Both offenses came out just as bad in the second half, resulting in a combined five consecutive 3-and-outs. Midway through the third quarter, Devin McCourty intercepted Rivers at the Patriots 44 and returned it 56 yards for a touchdown, but a helmet-to-helmet hit by Browner on Ladarius Green nullified the score. Replays showed Browner hit his shoulder, not his head, but the ruling was upheld. The break seemed to spur the Chargers to a score, as they reached Patriots territory but Rivers was intercepted by Akeem Ayers at the Patriots 30-yard line. The Patriots offense continued their cold streak by going three-and-out on their fourth straight drive, but their defense continued to shut down San Diego. A 16-yard punt return by Edelman set the Patriots up at their own 25. They marched 55 yards to the Chargers 20, and took the lead on a 38-yard Gostkowski field goal, giving the Patriot a 16-14 lead midway through the fourth quarter. After the Chargers went three-and-out for the fourth time in five drives(the lone exception ending in an interception), Brady hit Edelman on the first play of the their next drive for a 69-yard catch-and-run touchdown. The extra point made the score 23-14, sealing another Patriots win. Despite the win, the Chargers showed that the Patriots offense was still prone to mistakes. Edelman was the star, with 8 catches for 141 yards and a touchdown. The Patriots defense had a great showing, holding the Chargers to just 216 total yards, sacking Philip Rivers four times, with an interception. This loss would send the Chargers to ultimately lose three of their last four and their season.
Output: How many more field goals did Gostkowski make than he missed?
Passage: Coming off their first loss in their last 8 games, the Patriots came to San Diego to face the 8-4 Chargers, who were on a three-game winning streak. After forcing the Chargers to punt, the Patriots put together a 17 play, 89-yard marathon drive to the Chargers 1-yard line, but on 3rd-and-goal Brady was sacked for a 7-yard loss and Shareece Wright blocked Gostkowski's 26-yard field goal attempt, but he was flagged for being offsides, and Gostkowski made a 22-yard field goal. The Chargers answered the Patriots on their next drive, marching 80 yards in 11 plays with Philip Rivers hitting Malcolm Floyd for a 15-yard touchdown to put the Chargers up 7-3. On the fourth play of the Patriots next drive, Brady threw a two-yard pass to LaFell, who was stripped by Jahleel Addae with Darrell Stuckey picking up the fumble and rumbling 53 yards for a touchdown and a 14-3 Chargers lead. The Patriots drove all the way to the Charges 4-yard line, but the Chargers defense made a stand and the Patriots settled for a 22-yard Gostkowski field goal, and the score was 14-6. After forcing a Chargers three-and-out, Bolden blockedMike Scifres' punt, knocking him out of the game, at the Chargers 25. Four plays later, Brady threw a 14-yard touchdown pass to Gronkowski, cutting the deficit to 14-13. After another Chargers punt, the Patriots drove to the Chargers 18, but Brady was intercepted by Manti Te'o at the 4, concluding a sloppy, unimpressive, first half for both offenses. Both offenses came out just as bad in the second half, resulting in a combined five consecutive 3-and-outs. Midway through the third quarter, Devin McCourty intercepted Rivers at the Patriots 44 and returned it 56 yards for a touchdown, but a helmet-to-helmet hit by Browner on Ladarius Green nullified the score. Replays showed Browner hit his shoulder, not his head, but the ruling was upheld. The break seemed to spur the Chargers to a score, as they reached Patriots territory but Rivers was intercepted by Akeem Ayers at the Patriots 30-yard line. The Patriots offense continued their cold streak by going three-and-out on their fourth straight drive, but their defense continued to shut down San Diego. A 16-yard punt return by Edelman set the Patriots up at their own 25. They marched 55 yards to the Chargers 20, and took the lead on a 38-yard Gostkowski field goal, giving the Patriot a 16-14 lead midway through the fourth quarter. After the Chargers went three-and-out for the fourth time in five drives(the lone exception ending in an interception), Brady hit Edelman on the first play of the their next drive for a 69-yard catch-and-run touchdown. The extra point made the score 23-14, sealing another Patriots win. Despite the win, the Chargers showed that the Patriots offense was still prone to mistakes. Edelman was the star, with 8 catches for 141 yards and a touchdown. The Patriots defense had a great showing, holding the Chargers to just 216 total yards, sacking Philip Rivers four times, with an interception. This loss would send the Chargers to ultimately lose three of their last four and their season.
Output: How many more field goals were made in the first half than the second?