niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: How many in percent from the census weren't Polish?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: How many in percent from the census weren't from two or more races?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: How many people were not of German ancestry, in percentage?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: How many percent of people in the 2000 census did not speak the English language as their first language?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: How many races each made up less than 1% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: In the 2000 census, how many percent of people spoke a language other than English or Spanish as their first language?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral group is larger: English or Italian?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral group is larger: Irish or English?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral group is larger: Irish or Italian?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral group is smaller: Irish or English?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral group is smaller: Irish or Italian?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral groups are at least 10%?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestral groups are smaller than 11%?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestry group consisted of more people than Irish and Polish people combined?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which ancestry groups each made up more than 9% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is larger: Germans or English?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is larger: Germans or Irish?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is larger: Germans or Polish?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is smaller: Germans or English?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is smaller: Germans or Irish?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 83,955 people, 32,023 households, and 21,647 families residing in the county.  The population density was 64 people per square mile (25/km²).  There were 39,839 housing units at an average density of 30 per square mile (12/km²).  The racial makeup of the county was 94.63% Race (United States Census), 1.06% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 2.60% Race (United States Census), 0.46% Race (United States Census), 0.02% Race (United States Census), 0.23% from Race (United States Census), and 1.01% from two or more races.  0.94% of the population were Hispanics in the United States or Race (United States Census) of any race. 26.8% were of Germans, 13.2% Irish people, 11.3% English people, 9.1% Polish people, 8.2% Italian people and 7.4% United States ancestry according to Census 2000. 95.2% spoke English language and 1.4% Spanish language as their first language.
Output: Which group from the census is smaller: Germans or Polish?
Passage: The Panthers began their season with a Week 1 duel with the Philadelphia Eagles. They were playing with Jake Delhomme, who had five interceptions, and one fumble in their postseason game, last year, vs. the Arizona Cardinals.  In the first quarter, Carolina pounced first with running back DeAngelo Williams getting an 11-yard touchdown run.  The Eagles would respond with kicker David Akers getting a 49-yard field goal.  In the second quarter, Philadelphia took control as Panthers quarterback Jake Delhomme lost a fumble, which was recovered by defensive end Victor Abiamiri and returned two yards for a touchdown.  Also, wide receiver DeSean Jackson returned a punt 85 yards for a touchdown, and quarterback Donovan McNabb completed a 9-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek and a 4-yard touchdown pass to running back Brian Westbrook.  The Panthers would close out the period with kicker John Kasay nailing a 22-yard field goal.  Afterwards, in the third quarter, the Eagles closed out their domination as McNabb got a 3-yard touchdown run. Delhomme (7-of-17 for 73 yards) was benched after committing five turnovers (four interceptions and a fumble).
Output: Who scored the first touchdown of the game?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: How many total field goals were there?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: How many touchdowns did Seattle score in the game?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: How many touchdowns did the 49ers score in the game?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: How many turnovers did the 49ers have?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: Which team allowed the least points?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: Which team had the most field goals?
Passage: The Thanksgiving night matchup against Seattle on national television turned out to be a Seahawk win. While the defense held Seattle to a touchdown and four field goals, the Niners only managed 164 yards of offense and one third quarter field goal. The offense, which traditionally collapsed this season in the face of second half adjustments, never got untracked at all, averaging 3.2 yards per pass and 3.6 yards per rush. Two Colin Kaepernick interceptions and a Perrish Cox fumble were the difference in the game. After the game, 49ers owner Jed York apologized to fans on Twitter for his team's poor performance.
Output: Who made more field goals, Niners or Seattle?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: About how many more percent of Amerians worked in services in 1980 than in 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Did less people work in agriculture in 1980 or 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Did more Americans work in services in 1980 or in 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many less worked in Agriculture in the United States than industry?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many more percent is the male unemployment rate compared to the female unemployment rate?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many more percent is the unemployment rate among African-Americans in 2009 comapred to Caucasians?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent higher was male unemployment compared to female in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent more African-Americans are unemployed compared to Caucasians in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent more people worked in services in 1980 compared to 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of American females were not unemployed in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of American males were not unemployed in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of Americans did not work in services in 1950?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of Americans did not work in services in 1980?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of Blacks were not unemployed in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percent of Caucasians were not unemployed in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many percentage were male unemployed than females in 2009?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: How many was the percentage range between 30% and 35% that worked in the industry in 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: In 1955 did more Americans work in industry or services?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: In 1955 did more Americans work in services or in industry?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: In 1955, did fewer Americans work in services or agriculture?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: In which sector were most Americans working in 1955?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Which gender was less unemployed, males or females?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Which race had the highest unemployment in the US in 1955,Caucasians or African Americans?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Which year had less employees in services, 1955 or 1980?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Which year had more people working in agriculture, 1955 or 1980?
Passage: After being higher in the postwar period, the U.S. unemployment rate fell below the rising eurozone unemployment rate in the mid-1980s and has remained significantly lower almost continuously since. In 1955, 55% of Americans worked in services, between 30% and 35% in industry, and between 10% and 15% in Agriculture in the United States. By 1980, over 65% were employed in services, between 25% and 30% in industry, and less than 5% in agriculture. Male unemployment continued to be significantly higher than those of females (at 9.8% vs. 7.5% in 2009). The unemployment among Caucasians continues being much lower than those for African-Americans (at 8.5% vs. 15.8% also in 2009).
Output: Who was more out of work, Caucasians or African-Americans?
Passage: Georgetown recorded a population of 118,363 in the 2012 Guyanese census, down 12 percent from the 134,497 people counted in the 2002 census. In 2002, about 70,962 (53%) listed themselves as Black people/Ethnic groups of Africa; 31,902 (24%) as Mixed Race; 26,542 (20%) as Indian people;  1,441 (1.1%) as Amerindian; 1075 (0.8%) as Portuguese people; 475 (0.35%) as Chinese people; 2,265 (1.7%) as "dont know/not stated"; 196 (0.15%) as white people not of Portuguese descent; 35 as "other".
Output: As of 2002, what were the two most populous racial groups?
Passage: Georgetown recorded a population of 118,363 in the 2012 Guyanese census, down 12 percent from the 134,497 people counted in the 2002 census. In 2002, about 70,962 (53%) listed themselves as Black people/Ethnic groups of Africa; 31,902 (24%) as Mixed Race; 26,542 (20%) as Indian people;  1,441 (1.1%) as Amerindian; 1075 (0.8%) as Portuguese people; 475 (0.35%) as Chinese people; 2,265 (1.7%) as "dont know/not stated"; 196 (0.15%) as white people not of Portuguese descent; 35 as "other".
Output: By how many people did the population of Georgetown decrease between 2002 and 2012?
Passage: Georgetown recorded a population of 118,363 in the 2012 Guyanese census, down 12 percent from the 134,497 people counted in the 2002 census. In 2002, about 70,962 (53%) listed themselves as Black people/Ethnic groups of Africa; 31,902 (24%) as Mixed Race; 26,542 (20%) as Indian people;  1,441 (1.1%) as Amerindian; 1075 (0.8%) as Portuguese people; 475 (0.35%) as Chinese people; 2,265 (1.7%) as "dont know/not stated"; 196 (0.15%) as white people not of Portuguese descent; 35 as "other".
Output: How many more individual people are there that are Portuguese than white people not of Portuguese descent?