niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: How many years after receiving the Vautrin Lud Prize did Torsten Hagerstrand die?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: How many years did Samuel Pufendorf live?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: How many years longer did Peter Wiselgren live than Samuel Pufendorf?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: How many years was Gunnar Jarring an ambassador for Sweden in total?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: Was Gunnar Jarring an ambassador to the UN or Washington D.C. longer?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: Was Gunnar Jarring first an ambassador to the UN or to Washington D.C.?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: Which of the notable persons mentioned were alive in the 2000s?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: Which persons mentioned had died previous to the 1800s?
Passage: Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694) was a notable jurist and philosopher known for his natural law theories, influencing Adam Smith  as well as Thomas Jefferson. Olof von Dalin (1708-1763) was an influential Swedish writer and historian of the late Age of Enlightenment. Peter Wieselgren (1800-1877) was a Swedish priest, literature critic and prominent leader of the Swedish temperance movements. Knut Wicksell (1851-1926) was an influential economist, sometimes considered one of the founders of modern macroeconomics. Oscar Olsson (1877-1950) was an important developer of self-education in Sweden and known as the father of study circles. Bertil Ohlin (1899-1979) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1977 for theories concerning international trade and capital, and was the leader of the Liberals Peoples Party (Liberals (Sweden)) for 23 years. Gunnar Jarring (1907-2002) was Swedens ambassador in UN 1956-1958, and Swedens ambassador in Washington, D.C. 1958-1964. Britta Holmström (1911-1992) was the founder of Individuell Människohjälp (IM), a human rights organization with activities in 12 countries. Torsten Hägerstrand (1916-2004) was an internationally renowned geographer, considered the father of time geography and receiver of the Vautrin Lud Prize in 1992. Judith Wallerstein (1921-2012) was a renowned psychologist and internationally recognized authority on the effects of marriage and divorce on children and their parents.
Output: Who was born first, Samuel Pufendorf or Olof von Dalin?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Between 2010 and 2014, in which season did Inter have it's highest ranking?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Did commercial or broadcasting occupy a larger percentage of the revenue in the 2008-09 season?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: How many more million €s did Nike contribute to commercial revenues compared to Pirelli?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: How many places did Inter drop in terms of revenue between 2008-09 and the 2013-14 season?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: How many teams earned more revenue than Inter in the 2008-09 season?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: In the 2008-09 season, who had more revenue, Milan or Inter?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: What boosted revenue in the 2009-10 season?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: What season did Inter rank the lowest, considering revenue alone?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: What sectors were revenue divided between?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who contributed more to commercial revenues, Nike or Pirelli?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who earned more revenue in the 2008-09 season, Inter, or Juventus?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who earned more revenue in the 2009-2010 season, Milan or Inter?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who had the higher revenue ranking in the 2009-10 season, Milan or Juventus?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who ranked higher in the 2008-90 season, Inter or Juventus?
Passage: Considering revenue alone, Inter surpassed city rivals in Deloitte Football Money League for the first time, in the 2008–09 season, to rank in 9th place, one place behind Juventus in 8th place. (Milan in 10th place.) In the 2009–10 season, Inter remained in 9th place, surpassing Juventus (10th) but Milan re-took the leading role as the 7th. Inter became the 8th in 2010–11, but was still one place behind Milan. Since 2011, Inter fell to 11th in 2011–12, 15th in 2012–13 and 17th in 2013–14 season. In 2008–09 season, Revenue percentages were divided up between matchday (14%, €28.2 million), broadcasting (59%, €115.7 million, +7%, +€8 million) and commercial (27%, €52.6 million, +43%). Kit sponsors Nike and Pirelli contributed €18.1 million and €9.3 million respectively to commercial revenues, while broadcasting revenues were boosted €1.6 million (6%) by Champions League distribution. in 2009–10 season the revenue was boosted by the sales of Zlatan Ibrahimović, the Treble (association football) and the release clause of coach José Mourinho. For the 2010–11 season, Serie A clubs started negotiating club TV rights collectively rather than individually. This was predicted to result in lower broadcasting revenues for Inter, with smaller clubs gaining from the loss. Eventually the result included an extraordinary income of €13 million from RAI. Deloitte expressed the idea that issues in Italian football, particularly matchday revenue issues were holding Inter back compared to other European giants, and developing their own stadia would result in Serie A clubs being more competitive on the world stage.
Output: Who was ranked higher in the Deloitte Football Money League in the 2009-10 season, Inter or Juventus?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: How many is the difference between the minimum and maximum population estimates around Lake Petén Itzá in 1697?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: How many years spanned between Martin de Ursua becoming Governor-General of the Phillippines and the 1714 census?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: What caused the population of Petén to fall to just over 3000 people in 1714?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: What did Martín de Ursúa take up in 1709?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: Who was not counted in the 1714 census?
Passage: Martín de Ursúa used his conquest of the Itza as a stepping stone to achieving the coveted post of Governor-General of the Philippines, which he took up in 1709. European-introduced diseases devastated the native population of Petén, with the effects of disease compounded by the psychological impact of defeat. The population around Lake Petén Itzá numbered between 20,000 and 40,000 in 1697. By 1714, a census recorded just over 3,000 individuals in Spanish Petén, including non-Indians. This number would not have included the so-called "wild" Maya living in the forest far from Spanish administration and control. By 1700 the new colonial capital of Petén was mainly inhabited by colonists, soldiers and convicts. During the second half of the 18th century, adult male Indians were heavily taxed, often being forced into debt peonage. Western Petén and neighbouring Chiapas remained sparsely populated, and the Maya inhabitants avoided contact with the Spanish. San José, on the northwest shore of lake Petén Itzá, is the home of the last surviving speakers of the Itza language. The surname Kowoj still survives, but the Kowoj and Itza have fully merged and no longer exist as separate ethnicities. In modern times there is a history of conflict between San José  and neighbouring San Andrés , and this mutual hostility probably represents ancient hostility between the Itza and the Kowoj.
Output: Who were the old enemies of the Itza?