niryuu/sni-each-converted huggingface dataset:
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: How many more dollars was the personal  debt load in Ontario compared to Manitoba and Saskatchewan?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: How many more dollars was the personal  debt load in Ontario compared to Quebec?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: How many more percentage points did debt levels increase since 2012 in Western Canada compared to Eastern Canada?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: How many percentage points less of Canadians were debt free from 2012 to 2013?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: What all locations did the debt load increase less than 15%?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: What all locations did the debt load increase more than 30%?
Passage: Household debt in 2013 According to the August 2013 third annual Ipsos Reid Debt Poll only 24 per cent of Canadians were debt free in 2013 compared to 26 per cent in 2012. The average personal non-mortgage debt in 2013 was $15,920 up from $13,141 in 2012. According to an IPSOS chart produced in 2013 debt levels increased "a staggering 35 per cent" in Western Canada compared to 10 per cent in Eastern Canada since 2012 even before the Alberta floods. In Alberta in 2013 household debt rose 63 per cent to $24,271 per household from 2012 after the 2013 Alberta floods. In 2013 the average personal debt load in British Columbia was "up 38 per cent to $15,549"; in "Manitoba and Saskatchewan, up 32 per cent to $16,145"; in Ontario, "up 13 per cent to $17,416", in Quebec up "3 per cent to $10,458"; and in Atlantic Canada, "up 12 per cent to $15,243".
Output: What all locations did the debt load increase?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many households and families are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more households are there than families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more housing units are there than families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more housing units are there than households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more housing units than households were there in the 2000 census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more housing units were there compared to households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more people are there than families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more people are there than households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more people are there than housing units?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more people than families are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many more people than households are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many people (as a percentage) in the county were Hispanic in 2000?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many people and families are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many people and households are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many people, households, and families are in the county according to the census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many percent of people were not Hispanic?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many percent of people were not white non-Hispanic?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many percent of people were not white?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many races did not make up more than 1% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many races each made up more than 20% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many races made up 3% or more but less than 4% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many races made up more than the race that made up 16.74% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: How many races made up more than the race that only made up 0.06% of the population?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: In the 2000 census, were there more households or families residing in the county?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Were there more housing units or households in the county in the 2000 census?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Where there more families or households in the county?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is larger for the county according to the census: households or families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is larger for the county according to the census: people or families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is larger for the county according to the census: people or households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: households or families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: people or families?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: people or households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: which had less, housing units or households?
Passage: As of the census of 2000, there were 1,623,018 people, 654,445 households, and 411,645 families residing in the county. The population density was 1,346 people per square mile (520/km²). There were 741,043 housing units at an average density of 615 per square mile (237/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 70.57% Race (United States Census) (58% were Non-Hispanic), 20.54% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.24% Race (United States Census), 2.25% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 3.00% from Race (United States Census), and 3.35% from two or more races. 16.74% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race.
Output: which had more, households or families?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many field goals did Gould make?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many more total field goal yard did Shaun Suisham make than Robbie Gould?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many of Robbie Gould's field goals in the first half were over 30 yards?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many of Suisham's field goals were from below 40 yards in the second half?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many points did the Bears win the game by?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many points were scored in the first half of the game?
Passage: The Steelers returned home after a tough road loss to the Bengals to take on the Bears.  The first quarter was all Bears as they scored 17 unanswered points with Robbie Gould nailing a 47-yard field goal for a 3-0 lead followed up by Matt Forte's 5-yard touchdown run to make the score 10-0 and then Michael Bush's 1-yard touchdown run for a 17-0 lead.  The Steelers managed to get on the board in the 2nd quarter when Shaun Suisham nailed a 27-yard field goal to shorten the lead to 17-3, however the Bears increased their lead when Major Wright returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown to make the score 24-3.  The Steelers came within 14 points at halftime as Ben Roetlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 33-yard touchdown pass to  shorten the score 24-10.  After the break, Gould kicked a 32-yard field goal increasing the Bears' lead to 27-10, but the Steelers answered with 13 straight points starting in the 3rd heading into the 4th quarter as Suisham nailed a 36-yard field goal for a 14-point deficit 27-13 and then a 21-yard pass to Brown from Roethlisberger again shortening the lead to 7 at 27-20.  In the 4th quarter, the Steelers came within 4 points as Suisham nailed a 44-yard field goal to make the score 27-23.  However, the Bears were able to seal the victory with Jay Cutler's 17-yard pass to Earl Bennett for a score of 34-23 and then Julius Peppers' 42-yard fumble return for a touchdown (with a failed PAT) for a final score of 40-23. With the loss, the Steelers dropped to 0-3 but on a positive note the team's 21-point deficit is the largest erased deficit in the franchise's history.  Though on the negative side the Browns won earlier in the day leaving the team in last in the AFC North.
Output: How many points were scored in the second half of the game?