Trial of aripiprazole in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia.
Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia. It is effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The aim of the present study was to investigate therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.



Twenty-one patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were recruited. The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) were completed at the beginning of the study and again after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment. Side-effects were analyzed using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser Side-Effect Rating Scale. Weight was checked at each testing session, and prolactin levels were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment.



Significant benefits were observed after the first week of treatment. After 1 week of aripiprazole treatment, subscale and total scores on the PANSS had decreased significantly. This significant decrease was maintained throughout the study period. The mean score of CGI severity was also significantly different after 2 weeks of aripiprazole administration when compared to baseline score, and the significance was maintained thereafter. Weight did not significantly change after aripiprazole administration. Although mean prolactin level was decreased at 8 weeks, the difference was not significant.



Aripiprazole is an effective and well-tolerated antipsychotic agent in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Further investigations with larger samples are needed.

title: No Association between Serotonin Receptor 2C-759C/T Polymorphism and Weight Change or Treatment Response to Mirtazapine in Korean Depressive Patients
abstract: Activation of one or more serotonin (5-HT) receptors may play a role in mediating the antidepressant effects of serotonergic antidepressants. The serotonin 2C (5HT 2C) receptor is known to be associated with antidepressant action and weight gain. We sought to determine whether the 5-HTR 2C receptor -759C/T polymorphism was associated with weight gain and treatment response to mirtazapine in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients.  The 5-HT 2C receptor -759C/T polymorphism was analyzed in 323 MDD patients. All patients were evaluated using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at the beginning of the study and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks of mirtazapine treatment.  There was no significant difference in the 5-HT 2C receptor -759C/T genotype distribution between responder and non-responder groups. The 5-HT 2C receptor -759C/T polymorphism was not associated with weight change over time after mirtazapine administration.  The 5-HT 2C receptor -759C/T polymorphism does not appear to be a predictor of treatment response to mirtazapine. This polymorphism was not associated with weight change after 8 weeks of mirtazapine treatment. Further investigation on other polymorphisms of the 5-HT 2C gene is required to determine whether the 5-HT 2C gene influences treatment response and weight change after mirtazapine administration in patients with major depressive disorder.

title: Demonstration of decreased gray matter concentration in the midbrain encompassing the dorsal raphe nucleus and the limbic subcortical regions in major depressive disorder: an optimized voxel-based morphometry study.
abstract: Previous neuroimaging studies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have reported changes in several brain areas, such as the medial and dorsolateral orbital cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and basal ganglia. However, the results of these studies are inconsistent, and relatively few studies have been conducted using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to detect gray matter concentration (GMC) abnormalities in patients with MDD.



We examined 47 MDD patients and 51 healthy controls to investigate structural abnormalities using a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging system, which was normalized to a customized T1 template and segmented with optimized VBM. Analysis of covariance with age and gender as covariates was adopted for the VBM statistics; the level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05 for the corrected false discovery rate.



Decreased GMC was found in MDD patients in the bilateral amygdalae, hippocampi, fusiform gyri, lingual gyri, insular gyri, middle-superior temporal gyri, thalami, cingulate gyri, the central lobule of the cerebellum, and the midbrain encompassing the dorsal raphe nuclei (DRN).



Half of our study subjects were taking antidepressants. This may have been a potential confounding factor if any of the medications affected cortical volume.



The results suggest that the GMC of several regions associated with emotion regulation was lower in MDD patients. In particular, we found decreased GMC in the DRN. These findings may provide a better understanding of the anatomical properties of the neural mechanisms underlying the etiology of MDD.

title: Reconstitution and characterization of a new desosaminyl transferase, EryCIII, from the erythromycin biosynthetic pathway.
abstract: EryCIII converts alpha-mycarosyl erythronolide B into erythromycin D using TDP-d-desosamine as the glycosyl donor. We report the heterologous expression, purification, in vitro reconstitution, and preliminary characterization of EryCIII. Coexpression of EryCIII with the GroEL/ES chaperone complex was found to enhance greatly the expression of soluble EryCIII protein. The enzyme was found to be highly active with a kcat greater than 100 min-1. EryCIII was quite selective for the natural nucleotide sugar donor and macrolide acceptor substrates, unlike several other antibiotic glycosyl transferases with broad specificity such as desVII, oleG2, and UrdGT2. Within detectable limits, neither 6-deoxyerythronolide B nor 10-deoxymethynolide were found to be glycosylated by EryCIII. Furthermore, TDP-d-mycaminose, which only differs from TDP-d-desosamine at the C4 position, could not be transferred to alphaMEB. These studies lay the groundwork for detailed structural and mechanistic analysis of an important member of the desosaminyl transferase family of enzymes.

title: Hydrocortisone for refractory hypotension of very low birth weight infant with patent ductus arteriosus: a case report
abstract: A male infant weighing 1,090 g, 28 weeks of gestation, was scheduled to take a ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Eight days after birth, mean arterial pressure (MAP) has fall to \30 mmHg. We started with dopamine (5–10 lg/kg/min), to maintain the blood pressure, but this was not successful. Although we did not confirm an adrenal insufficiency (AI), we decided to start medication of hydrocortisone, 3 mg/kg/day, which resulted in over 50/35 mmHg. The hydrocortisone was tapered for 3 days because MBP was maintained at[40 mmHg, and 5 lg/kg/min of dopamine was maintained until the day of surgery. At 31 days after birth, we induced anesthesia with 2 mg/kg of ketamine, 20 lg/kg of fentanyl, and 0.9 mg/kg of rocuronium without premedication. Anesthesia was maintained by a continuous infusion of ketamine (1 mg/kg/h) and intermittent rocuronium in 50% O2 with air. After ligation of a PDA, MAP was decreased to 30 mmHg by degrees which required an increase to 10 lg/kg/ min of dopamine and the addition of 5 lg/kg/min of dobutamine to maintain over 30 mmHg. An echocardiogram showed globally normal contractility without a PDA. In spite of our efforts, mean blood pressure had fallen to 24 mmHg at 6 h after ligation. The patient was commenced on intravenous hydrocortisone (3 mg/kg/day), which increased MAP to above 30 mmHg and heart rate to 172 bpm after 90 min. After 4 h, MAP was maintained over 50 mmHg and heart rate was 190 bpm. Two days after surgery, the dopamine, dobutamine, and hydrocortisone were tapered and the blood pressure was maintained until discharge. Hypotension of very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants is a major factor of morbidity, and mortality. Inotropes such as dopamine and dobutamine are widely used to normalize blood pressure but more than 50% of hypotensive VLBW infants requiring dopamine at doses[10 mg/kg/min develop refractory hypotension (RH) that is resistant to vasopressor . Hydrocortisone is beneficial in treatment of RH, but the mechanisms are not completely understood. Down-regulation of cardiovascular adrenergic receptors and the development of relative adrenal insufficiency are thought to be the factors that may explain the corticosteroid responsiveness of RH [2, 3]. Cardiovascular response to catechol amines is attenuated due to down-regulation of the cardiovascular adrenergic receptors in VLBW infants with critical illness . Moreover, VLBW infants have low adrenal reserves and reach a relatively adrenal insufficiency (AI) state in stressed situations . Watterberg et al.  has reported hydrocortisone (1 mg/kg every 8 h) was effective for VLBW infants with AI. In this case, the infant had RH in spite of the treatment with inotropes after birth and PDA ligation, and we successfully treated him with hydrocortisone. Thus, we recommend that early hydrocortisone therapy be administered to VLBW premature infants for perioperative RH resistant to inotropes..

title: Phase IV, 8-week, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, parallel group, efficacy, and tolerability study of high-dose candesartan cilexetil combined with hydrochlorothiazide in Korean adults with stage II hypertension.
abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose (32 mg) candesartan in Asians.



In Korean adult patients with stage II hypertension, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan 16 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 12.5 mg and candesartan 32 mg/HCT 12.5 mg compared with candesartan 16-mg and 32-mg monotherapy, respectively. This Phase IV, 8-week, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, parallel group, efficacy, and tolerability study, named CAESAR (Candesartan Effect in Second Stage Arterial Hypertension), enrolled 253 patients with stage II hypertension. Treatment started with either candesartan 16 mg or candesartan 16 mg/HCT 12.5 mg. After 4 weeks, the candesartan dose was forced titrated to 32 mg in both groups. The primary and secondary objectives were to compare the blood pressure (BP) changes after 4 weeks and 8 weeks between candesartan-HCT combination therapy and candesartan monotherapy. The proportion of patients achieving target BP (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <140 mm Hg, but <130 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mm Hg, but <80 mm Hg for those with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease) after 4 and 8 weeks of therapy was also evaluated. Adverse events were investigated both by spontaneous report by the patient and by the investigators' evaluations in each visit. Laboratory tests were performed at the end of the study to evaluate drug tolerability.



Study patients were all Asians, mostly male (65.7%), with a mean (SD) age of 49.4 (10.6) years and a mean body weight of 68.9 (12.1) kg; there were no between-group variances in demographic profiles except that the mean age in the candesartan-HCT group (51.0 [10.2] years) was about 3.2 years higher than that in the candesartan monotherapy group (47.8 [10.7] years; P = 0.02) despite random allocation. A total of 80.4% of the study patients had not been treated before, whereas 19.6% were previously treated and enrolled after 2 weeks of washout period. Baseline sitting systolic/diastolic BPs (SBP/DBP) were 160.7 (13.0)/104.6 (9.5) mm Hg. After 4 weeks, patients treated with candesartan 16 mg/HCT 12.5 mg showed significant decreases in SBP/DBP of 28.7 (17.5)/17.8 (10.2) mm Hg, and those in the candesartan 16 mg monotherapy group showed decreases of 20.5 (14.5)/14.1 (10.1) mm Hg (P < 0.01 between treatments for both SBP and DBP). After forced titration of candesartan from 16 mg to 32 mg at week 8, there was an additional reduction in SBP/DBP of 4.1 (12.7)/3.8 (8.3) mm Hg in the candesartan-HCT combination therapy group and 4.0 (11.6)/2.0 (8.5) mm Hg in the candesartan monotherapy group (P < 0.001 for SBP and DBP in both groups compared with values at week 4). A greater proportion of patients (70.6%) attained the target BP in the candesartan-HCT combination therapy group than in the candesartan monotherapy group (53.2%, P = 0.014). A total of 32 mg of candesartan was well tolerated both in combination therapy with HCT and in monotherapy. Dizziness was the most common adverse event in both groups (5 and 2 patients, respectively).



The candesartan-HCT combination was associated with a statistically significant lowering of BP compared with candesartan monotherapy.

title: Mixed-type paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma--a case report.
abstract: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue tumor of childhood; about 80% of cases occur before the age of 21 with the remaining 20% evenly spread throughout the remaining decades. A primary paratesticular site is considered to have a good prognosis in comparison with other RMS sites. Histologically, any subtype of RMS, including alveolar, pleomorphic, embryonal, and mixed type, may occur in the paratesticular region, but only a relatively small number of cases are mixed and this variant has a poor prognosis. We report a case of paratesticular RMS (mixed embryonal and alveolar type) in a 16-year-old boy.

title: Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.
abstract: The commercially available formulation of amlodipine is conjugated with besylate salt to increase water solubility. Recently, a new amlodipine salt formulation has been developed in which the free base of amlodipine is conjugated with a chemically different salt, adipate.



The goal of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of amlodipine adipate with those of amlodipine besylate in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.



This was a multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study in which patients received 8 weeks of treatment with either amlodipine adipate or amlodipine besylate. The primary efficacy variable was noninferiority of the difference in mean changes from baseline in trough diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary efficacy variables included mean changes in DBP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and response rate (defined as the proportion of patients whose DBP was <90 mm Hg or whose DBP had decreased from baseline by > or =10 mm Hg). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also assessed.



Two hundred eleven patients were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine adipate (n = 106) or amlodipine besylate (n = 105). Study patients were primarily female (54.5%), with a mean (SD) age of 52.2 (9.6) years and a mean body weight of 67.1 (10.2) kg; there were no between-group differences in demographic profiles. After 4 weeks of randomized treatment, 58 (27.5%) patients (29 [27.4%] amlodipine adipate, 29 [27.6%] amlodipine besylate) had not achieved a mean DBP <90 mm Hg, and their dose was doubled. Mean DBP changes at 8 weeks were -15.2 (7.3) mm Hg in the amlodipine adipate group and -14.2 (7.4) mm Hg in the amlodipine besylate group (P = NS). Because the 95% CI for the difference in mean DBP changes between groups (-0.53 to 2.55) was within the prespecified lower limit (-4 mm Hg), amlodipine adipate was considered noninferior to amlodipine besylate. Mean SBP changes were -24.9 (12.1) mm Hg in the amlodipine adipate group and -22.0 (14.7) mm Hg in the amlodipine besylate group (P = NS). The response rates were 92.0% for amlodipine adipate and 95.4% for amlodipine besylate (P = NS). The overall incidence of clinical AEs was 20.8% in the amlodipine adipate group and 25.7% in the amlodipine besylate group (P = NS). Drug-related clinical AEs occurred in 5.7% and 12.4% of patients in the respective treatment groups (P = NS). Serum uric acid levels decreased significantly from base-line in both groups (P < 0.001).



Eight weeks of treatment with amlodipine adipate produced significant reductions from baseline in blood pressure in these patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The efficacy of amlodipine adipate was not inferior to that of amlodipine besylate. Tolerability was comparable between the 2 treatment groups.