On chromatic roots of large subdivisions of graphs
Given a graph G, we derive an expression for the chromatic polynomials of the graphs resulting from subdividing some (or all) of its edges. For special subfamilies of these, we are able to describe the limits of their chromatic roots. We also prove that for any e >0, all sufficiently large subdivisions of G have their chromatic roots in | z −1| e . A consequence of our work will be a characterization of the graphs having a subdivision whose chromatic polynomial has a root with negative real part.

title: On chromatic roots with negative real part

title: A ramsey type problem concerning vertex colourings
abstract: Let H → k v G denote the fact that for every function π: V ( H ) → {1, …, k } there is an induced subgraph G ′ of H with G ′ ≅ G and V ( G ′) ⊆ π −1 ( i ) for some i . Folkman has shown that for all graphs G and for all positive integers k such a graph H exists. We examine here f ( G , k ), the minimum order of a graph H for which H → k v G . We show that for any fixed integer k ≥ 2 there are positive constants C 1 and C 2 such that C 1 n 2 ≤ max{ f ( G , k ): | V ( G )| = n } ≤ C 2 n 2 log 2 n .

title: The existence of uniquely -G colourable graphs
abstract: Given graphs F and G and a nonnegative integer k , a function π : V ( F ) → 1, …, k is a − G k-colouring of F if no induced copy of is monochromatic; F is − G k-chromatic if F has a − G k -colouring but no − G ( k − 1)-colouring. Further, we say F is uniquely − G k -colourable if F is − G k -chromatic and, up to a permutation of colours, it has only one − G k -colouring. Such notions are extensions of the well-known corresponding definitions from chromatic theory. It was conjectured that for all graphs G of order at least two and all positive integers k there exist uniquely − G k -colourable graphs. We prove the conjecture and show that, in fact, in all cases infinitely many such graphs exist.

title: The Complexity of Generalized Graph Colorings
abstract: Given a graph property P and positive integer k, a P k-coloring of a graph G is an assignment of one of k colors to each vertex of the graph so that the subgraphs induced by each color class have property P. This notion generalizes the standard definition of graph coloring, and has been investigated for many properties. We consider here the complexity of the decision problem. In particular, for the property —G, of not containing an induced subgraph isomorphic to G, we conjecture (and provide strong evidence) that —G k-colorability is NP-complete whenever G has order at least 3 and k ⩾ 2. The techniques rely on new NP-completeness results for hypergraph colorings.

title: Average independence polynomials
abstract: The independence polynomial of a graph G is the function i(G, x) = Σ k ≥ 0 ik xk, where ik is the number of independent sets of vertices in G of cardinality k. We investigate here the average independence polynomial, where the average is taken over all independence polynomials of (labeled) graphs of order n. We prove that while almost every independence polynomial has a nonreal root, the average independence polynomials always have all real, simple roots.

title: Steps Toward Automatic Theory Formation
abstract: This paper describes a theory formation system which can discover a partial axiomization of a data base represented as extensionally defined binary relations.- The system first discovers all possible intensional definitions of each binary relation in terms of the others. It then determines a minimal set of these relations from which the others can be defined. It then attempts to discover all the ways the relations of this minimal set can interact with each other, thus generating a set of inference rules. Although the system was originally designed to explore automatic techniques for theory construction for question-answering systems, it is currently being expanded to function as a symbiotic system to help social scientists explore certain kinds of data bases.

title: A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluences
abstract: A qualitative physics predicts and explains the behavior of mechanisms in qualitative terms. The goals for the qualitative physics are (1) to be far simpler than the classical physics and yet retain all the important distinctions (e.g., state, oscillation, gain, momentum) without invoking the mathematics of continuously varying quantities and differential equations, (2) to produce causal accounts of physical mechanisms that are easy to understand, and (3) to provide the foundations for commonsense models for the next generation of expert systems. This paper presents a fairly encompassing account of qualitative physics. First, we discuss the general subject of naive physics and some of its methodological considerations. Second, we present a framework for modeling the generic behavior of individual components of a device based on the notions of qualitative differential equations (confluences) and qualitative state. This requires developing a qualitative version of the calculus. The modeling primitives induce two kinds of behavior, intrastate and interstate, which are governed by different laws. Third, we present algorithms for determining the behavior of a composite device from the generic behavior of its components. Fourth, we examine a theory of explanation for these predictions based on logical proof. Fifth, we introduce causality as an ontological commitment for explaining how devices behave.

title: Theories of Causal Ordering
abstract: This paper is a response to Iwasaki and Simon  which criticizes de Kleer and Brown . We argue that many of their criticisms, particularly concerning causality, modeling and stability, originate from the difference of concerns between engineering and economics. Our notion of causality arises from considering the interconnections of components, not equations. When no feedback is present, the ordering produced by our qualitative physics is similar to theirs. However, when feedback is present, our qualitative physics determines a causal ordering around feedback loops as well. Causal ordering is a general technique not only applicable to qualitative reasoning. Therefore we also explore the relationship between causal ordering and propagation of constraints upon which the methods of qualitative physics are based.

title: Why AM and Eurisko Appear to Work
abstract: Seven years ago, the AM program was constructed as an experiment in learning by discovery. Its source of power was a large body of heuristics, rules which guided it toward fruitful topics of investigation, toward profitable experiments to perform, toward plausible hypotheses and definitions. "Other heuristics evaluated those discoveries for utility and "interestingness", and they were added to AM's vocabulary of concepts. AM's ultimate limitation apparently was due to its inability to discover new, powerful, domain-specific heuristics for the various new fields it uncovered. At that time, it seemed straight-forward to simply add Heuretics (the study of heuristics) as one more field in which to let AM explore, observe, define, and develop. That task - learning new heuristics by discovery - turned out to be much more difficult than was realized initially, and we have just now achieved some successes at it. Along the way, it became clearer why AM had succeeded in the first place, and why it was so difficult to use the same paradigm to discover new heuristics. This paper discusses those recent insights. They spawn questions about "where the meaning really resides" in the concepts discovered by AM. This leads to an appreciation of the crucial and unique role of representation in theory formation, a role involving the relationship between Form and Content.

title: G-functions for the hermeneutic circle of evolution
abstract: Evolution by natural selection may include both frequency and density-dependence. Frequency-dependent selection is a kind of hermeneutic circle. As a literary term (and a school of philosophy), a hermeneutic circle describes how each word of a sentence or paragraph simultaneously draws its meaning from its context (the other words) and contributes towards the context. Frequency dependence is like this. Under frequency dependence, the fitness of an individual is not only influenced by its own heritable phenotype (in evolutionary game theory heritable phenotype = strategy) but by the frequency of strategies found among others in the population. And, the fitness accrued by individuals with a particular strategy will in time influence the frequency of strategies in the population. The challenge is to develop conceptual and modeling tools that allow us to determine the outcome of this hermeneutic circle of evolution. We need a fitness concept that defines the fitness of (or payoff to) to individuals as influenced by both their own strategy and the strategies of others. And, this fitness formulation must describe how these payoffs translate into changes in strategy frequencies. The fitness generating function, or G-function, provides this service for evolutionary game theory.