English: [Review] [21 refs]</Title_Primary><Authors_Primary>Hyman,I.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Guruge,S.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Stewart,D.E.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Ahmad,F.</Authors_Primary><Date_Primary>2000/11</Date_Primary><Keywords>*Primary Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>mt [Methods]</Keywords><Keywords>*Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>pc [Prevention &amp; Control]</Keywords><Keywords>*Women&apos;s Health</Keywords><Keywords>Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>Article</Keywords><Keywords>Canada</Keywords><Keywords>Female</Keywords><Keywords>Health Education</Keywords><Keywords>Health Policy</Keywords><Keywords>Health Program</Keywords><Keywords>Humans</Keywords><Keywords>Law</Keywords><Keywords>Needs Assessment</Keywords><Keywords>Ontario</Keywords><Keywords>Ontario</Keywords><Keywords>ep [Epidemiology]</Keywords><Keywords>Policy</Keywords><Keywords>Power (Psychology)</Keywords><Keywords>Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>Primary Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>Research Support,Non-U.S.Gov&apos;t</Keywords><Keywords>Review</Keywords><Keywords>Safety Management</Keywords><Keywords>Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>lj [Legislation &amp; Jurisprudence]</Keywords><Keywords>Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>sn [Statistics &amp; Numerical Data]</Keywords><Keywords>United States</Keywords><Keywords>Universities</Keywords><Keywords>Victim</Keywords><Keywords>Victims</Keywords><Keywords>Violence</Keywords><Keywords>Women</Keywords><Keywords>Women&apos;s Health</Keywords><Keywords>Women&apos;s Rights</Keywords><Reprint>Not in File</Reprint><End_Page>Dec</End_Page><Periodical>Womens Health Issues.10(6):288-93,</Periodical><User_Def_1>Reviewed</User_Def_1><User_Def_2>Review</User_Def_2><User_Def_3>Include</User_Def_3><ZZ_JournalFull><f name="System">Womens Health Issues.10(6):288-93,</f></ZZ_JournalFull><ZZ_WorkformID>1</ZZ_WorkformID></MDL></Cite></Refman>29 While the authors describe that they were tasked to critically appraise the literature, the article is framed more at promoting interventions that are "successful" versus actually describing the nature of those successes and any limitations of the reviewed studies.
French: [Review] [21 refs]</Title_Primary><Authors_Primary>Hyman,I.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Guruge,S.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Stewart,D.E.</Authors_Primary><Authors_Primary>Ahmad,F.</Authors_Primary><Date_Primary>2000/11</Date_Primary><Keywords>*Primary Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>mt [Methods]</Keywords><Keywords>*Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>pc [Prevention &amp; Control]</Keywords><Keywords>*Women&apos;s Health</Keywords><Keywords>Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>Article</Keywords><Keywords>Canada</Keywords><Keywords>Female</Keywords><Keywords>Health Education</Keywords><Keywords>Health Policy</Keywords><Keywords>Health Program</Keywords><Keywords>Humans</Keywords><Keywords>Law</Keywords><Keywords>Needs Assessment</Keywords><Keywords>Ontario</Keywords><Keywords>Ontario</Keywords><Keywords>ep [Epidemiology]</Keywords><Keywords>Policy</Keywords><Keywords>Power (Psychology)</Keywords><Keywords>Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>Primary Prevention</Keywords><Keywords>Research Support,Non-U.S.Gov&apos;t</Keywords><Keywords>Review</Keywords><Keywords>Safety Management</Keywords><Keywords>Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>lj [Legislation &amp; Jurisprudence]</Keywords><Keywords>Spouse Abuse</Keywords><Keywords>sn [Statistics &amp; Numerical Data]</Keywords><Keywords>United States</Keywords><Keywords>Universities</Keywords><Keywords>Victim</Keywords><Keywords>Victims</Keywords><Keywords>Violence</Keywords><Keywords>Women</Keywords><Keywords>Women&apos;s Health</Keywords><Keywords>Women&apos;s Rights</Keywords><Reprint>Not in File</Reprint><End_Page>Dec</End_Page><Periodical>Womens Health Issues.10(6):288-93,</Periodical><User_Def_1>Reviewed</User_Def_1><User_Def_2>Review</User_Def_2><User_Def_3>Include</User_Def_3><ZZ_JournalFull><f name="System">Womens Health Issues.10(6):288-93,</f></ZZ_JournalFull><ZZ_WorkformID>1</ZZ_WorkformID></MDL></Cite></Refman>29. Bien que les auteurs indiquent qu’ils devaient effectuer une évaluation critique des documents, l’article tend davantage à promouvoir les interventions qui sont « efficaces » qu’à décrire la nature de ces interventions et les lacunes potentielles des études examinées.