English: <!-The description, claims or drawings (indicate particular elements below) or said claims Nos are so unclear that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify): --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-2 (claim-num* , p+)> <!-The said international application, or the said claims Nos. "rel-claims" relate to the following subject matter which does not require an international preliminary examination --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-1 (claim-num* , p+)> <!-The entire international application. --> <!ELEMENT entire-application EMPTY> <!-(PCT/IPEA/409) Box NO. II Priority --> <!ELEMENT iprp-priority (earlier-appl? , claim-invalid? , additional-info?)> <!-This opinion has been established as if no priority had been claimed due to the fact that the priority claim has been found invalid (Rules 43bis.1 and 64.1). Thus for the purposes of this opinion, the international filing date indicated above is considered to be the relevant date. --> <!ELEMENT claim-invalid EMPTY> <!-(PCT/IPEA/409) Box No. I Basis of the report --> <!ELEMENT iprp-basis ((iprp-basis-application? , iprp-basis-description* , iprpbasis-claims* , iprp-basis-drawings* , sequence-list-basis*) , basis-language-forexamination , cancellation-doc? , pct-rule70-2c?)> <!-4. This report has been established as if (some of) the amendments annexed to this report and listed below had not been made, since they have been considered to go beyond the disclosure as filed, as indicated in the Supplemental Box (Rule 70.2(c)). --> <!ELEMENT pct-rule70-2c (amend-description? , amend-claims? , amend-drawings? , amend-sequence-listing? , amend-sequence-listing-table?)> <!-The amendments have resulted in the cancellation of: -->
French: <!-No international search report has been established for said claims Nos. (rel-claims) --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-4 (claim-num+)> <!-The claims, or said claims Nos. (claim nos) are so inadequately supported by the description that no meaningful opinion could be formed. --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-3 (claim-num* , p+)> <!-The description, claims or drawings (indicate particular elements below) or said claims Nos are so unclear that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify): --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-2 (claim-num* , p+)> <!-The said international application, or the said claims Nos. "rel-claims" relate to the following subject matter which does not require an international preliminary examination --> <!ELEMENT non-estab-reason-1 (claim-num* , p+)> <!-The entire international application. --> <!ELEMENT entire-application EMPTY> <!-(PCT/IPEA/409) Box NO. II Priority --> <!ELEMENT iprp-priority (earlier-appl? , claim-invalid? , additional-info?)> <!-This opinion has been established as if no priority had been claimed due to the fact that the priority claim has been found invalid (Rules 43bis.1 and 64.1). Thus for the purposes of this opinion, the international filing date indicated above is considered to be the relevant date. --> <!ELEMENT claim-invalid EMPTY> <!-(PCT/IPEA/409) Box No. I Basis of the report --> <!ELEMENT iprp-basis ((iprp-basis-application? , iprp-basis-description* , iprpbasis-claims* , iprp-basis-drawings* , sequence-list-basis*) , basis-language-forexamination , cancellation-doc? , pct-rule70-2c?)> PCT/AI/DTD/4 page 383 <!-4.