next-tat/TAT-QA huggingface dataset:
Fiscal Years  
2018
2017
% Change
Telecom
$222,940
$340,022
(34.4)%
Data Center
162,098
172,481
(6.0)%
Industrial & Defense
185,360
186,269
(0.5)%
570,398
698,772
(18.4)%
Telecom
39.1%
48.6%
Data Center
28.4%
24.7%
Industrial & Defense
32.5%
26.7%
Total
100.0%
100.0%

text: Comparison of Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2018 to Fiscal Year Ended September 29, 2017
text: We acquired AppliedMicro on January 26, 2017 and certain assets of Picometrix on August 9, 2017, and we divested the Compute business on October 27, 2017 and our LR4 business on May 10, 2018. For additional information related to acquisitions and divestitures refer to Note 4 - Acquisitions and Note 23 - Divested Business and Discontinued Operations, respectively, in this Annual Report.
text: Our annual Statements of Operations includes activity since the dates of acquisition for AppliedMicro and Picometrix and excludes activity for the Compute business and LR4 business after the date of the divestiture, representing less than twelve months of activity for AppliedMicro and Picometrix for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017.
text: Revenue. In fiscal year 2018, our revenue decreased by $128.4 million, or 18.4%, to $570.4 million from $698.8 million for fiscal year 2017. Revenue from our primary markets, the percentage of change between the years and revenue by primary markets expressed as a percentage of total revenue were (in thousands, except percentages):
text: In fiscal year 2018, our Telecom market revenue decreased by $117.1 million, or 34.4%, compared to fiscal year 2017. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales of carrier-based optical semiconductor products to our Asia customer base, lower sales of products targeting fiber to the home applications and the May 2018 sale of our LR4 business.
text: In fiscal year 2018, our Data Center market revenue decreased by $10.4 million, or 6.0%, compared to fiscal year 2017. The decrease was primarily due to decreased revenue from sales of legacy optical products and lasers and cloud data center applications.
text: In fiscal year 2018, our I&D market revenues decreased by $0.9 million, or 0.5%, compared to fiscal year 2017. The decrease was primarily related to lower certain legacy defense products partially offset by higher revenue across other areas within the product portfolio.

Questions:
question: What led to decrease in I&D market revenues?
answer: lower certain legacy defense products partially offset by higher revenue across other areas within the product portfolio.
question: What is the change in Telecom value between fiscal year 2017 and 2018?
answer: -117082
derivation: 222,940-340,022
scale: thousand
question: What is the average Telecom value for fiscal year 2017 and 2018?
answer: 281481
derivation: (222,940+340,022) / 2
scale: thousand
question: In which year was Telecom value less than 300,000 thousand?
answer: 2018
derivation: locate and analyze Telecom in row 3
question: What was the respective value of Data Center in 2019 and 2018?
answer: 162,098
172,481
scale: thousand
question: When was AppliedMicro acquired?
answer: January 26, 2017
€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
Interest income
27
29
thereof finance leases
(0)
(0)
thereof from post-employment benefits plans
(5)
(7)
thereof from financial instruments of the measurement categories according to IFRS 9 (previous year: IAS39):
(16)
(12)
Interest expenses
−163
−148
thereof finance leases
(−51)
(−49)
thereof from post-employment benefits plans
(−16)
(−15)
thereof from financial instruments of the measurement categories according to IFRS9 (previous year: IAS39)
(−79)
(−69)
Interest result
−136
−119

text: 9. Net interest income/interest expenses
text: The interest result can be broken down as follows:
text: Interest income and interest expenses from financial instruments are assigned to the measurement categories according to IFRS 9 on the basis of the underlying transactions.
text: The interest expenses included here (of the measurement categories in accordance with IFRS 9) primarily include interest expenses for issued bonds (including the Commercial Paper Programme) of €41 million (2017/18: €55 million) and for liabilities to banks of €19 million (2017/18: €12 million).
text: The decline in interest expenses was primarily the result of more favourable refinancing terms.

Questions:
question: What are Interest income and interest expenses from financial instrument assigned to?
answer: assigned to the measurement categories according to IFRS 9 on the basis of the underlying transactions.
question: What led to the decline in interest expenses?
answer: primarily the result of more favourable refinancing terms.
question: What are the broad components in the table which are used to calculate the interest result?
answer: Interest income
Interest expenses
question: In which year was the interest income larger?
answer: 2018/2019
derivation: 29>27
question: What was the change in interest income in 2018/2019 from 2017/2018?
answer: 2
derivation: 29-27
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in interest income in 2018/2019 from 2017/2018?
answer: 7.41
derivation: (29-27)/27
scale: percent
(dollars in millions) Increase/(Decrease)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
Consumer
$ 91,056
$ 89,762
$ 1,294
1.4%
Business 
31,443
31,534
(91)
(0.3)
Corporate and other 
9,812
9,936
(124)
(1.2)
Eliminations 
(443)
(369)
(74)
20.1
Consolidated Revenues
$131,868
$130,863
$ 1,005
0.8

text: Consolidated Revenues
text: Consolidated revenues increased $1.0 billion, or 0.8%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to an increase in revenues at our Consumer segment, partially offset by decreases in revenues at our Business segment and Corporate and other.
text: Revenues for our segments are discussed separately below under the heading “Segment Results of Operations.”
text: Corporate and other revenues decreased $124 million, or 1.2%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to a decrease of $232 million in revenues within Verizon Media.

Questions:
question: What was the increase in the consolidated revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: $1.0 billion
question: What was the decrease in the corporate and other revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: $124 million
question: What caused the decrease in corporate and other revenue?
answer: a decrease of $232 million in revenues within Verizon Media.
question: What was the change in the consumer revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1294
derivation: 91,056 - 89,762
scale: million
question: What was the average business segment revenue for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 31488.5
derivation: (31,443 + 31,534) / 2
scale: million
question: What was the average corporate segment revenue and other segment revenue for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 9874
derivation: (9,812 + 9,936) / 2
scale: million
Named Executive Officer
Performance Share Units
Restricted Share Units
Stock Options
Total
Mark J. Barrenechea
$2,815,000
$1,407,500
$1,407,500
$5,630,000
Madhu Ranganathan
$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Muhi Majzoub
$550,000
$275,000
$275,000
$1,100,000
Gordon A. Davies
$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Simon Harrison
$218,750
$109,375
$109,375
$437,500

text: Fiscal 2021 LTIP
text: Grants made in Fiscal 2019 under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP took effect on August 6, 2018 with the goal of measuring performance over the three year period starting July 1, 2018. The table below illustrates the target value of each element under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP for each Named Executive Officer.
text: Awards granted in Fiscal 2019 under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP were in addition to the awards granted in Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2017, and prior years. For details of our previous LTIPs, see Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the appropriate year.

Questions:
question: What does the table represent?
answer: illustrates the target value of each element under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP for each Named Executive Officer
question: Who are the Named Executive Officers?
answer: Mark J. Barrenechea
Madhu Ranganathan
Muhi Majzoub
Gordon A. Davies
Simon Harrison
question: What is the total target value for Mark J. Barrenechea?
answer: 5,630,000
question: What is the average total target value for all Named Executive Officers?
answer: 1833500
derivation: (5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)/5
question: What is Mark J. Barrenechea's Total target value expressed as percentage of total target values for all Named Executive Officer?
answer: 61.41
derivation: 5,630,000/(5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)
scale: percent
question: What is Simon Harrison's Total target value expressed as percentage of total target values for all Named Executive Officer?
answer: 4.77
derivation: 437,500/(5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)
scale: percent
Fiscal Year ended January 31,
2019
2018
Total revenues
$2,632.6
$2,099.2
Pretax loss
(157.5)
(724.9)
Net loss
(200.1)
(734.5)

text: Unaudited Pro Forma Results of Acquirees
text: Autodesk has included the financial results of each of the acquirees in the consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition; the revenues and the results of each of the acquirees, except for PlanGrid, have not been material both individually or in the aggregate to Autodesk's fiscal 2019 and 2018 results.
text: The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the combined results of operations for Autodesk and PlanGrid, as though the companies were combined as of the beginning of Autodesk's fiscal year 2018. The unaudited pro forma financial information was as follows (in millions):
text: The pro forma financial information for all periods presented includes the business combination accounting effects from the acquisition of PlanGrid including amortization expense from acquired intangible assets, compensation expense, and the interest expense and debt issuance costs related to the term loan agreement. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the business combinations and factually supportable. The pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2018.
text: The pro forma financial information for fiscal 2019 and 2018 combines the historical results of the Company, the adjusted historical results of PlanGrid for fiscal 2019 and 2018 considering the date the Company acquired PlanGrid and the effects of the pro forma adjustments described above

Questions:
question: What does the pro forma financial information for all periods include?
answer: The pro forma financial information for all periods presented includes the business combination accounting effects from the acquisition of PlanGrid including amortization expense from acquired intangible assets, compensation expense, and the interest expense and debt issuance costs related to the term loan agreement
question: What does the pro forma financial information for fiscal 2019 and 2018 combine?
answer: The pro forma financial information for fiscal 2019 and 2018 combines the historical results of the Company, the adjusted historical results of PlanGrid for fiscal 2019 and 2018 considering the date the Company acquired PlanGrid and the effects of the pro forma adjustments described above
question: What is the total revenue for the fiscal year 2019?
answer: $2,632.6
question: What is the % change in the total revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 25.41
derivation: (($2,632.6-$2,099.2)/$2,099.2)
scale: percent
question: What is the change in the net loss from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -534.4
derivation: (734.5)-(200.1)
scale: million
question: What is the average total revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 2365.9
derivation: (2,632.6+2,099.2)/2 
scale: million
Restricted Stock-Based Awards Outstanding
(in millions, except fair value)
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Balance, May 31, 2016
52
$39.29
Granted
42
$39.40
Assumed
14
$37.83
Vested and Issued
(18)
$40.39
Canceled
(7)
$39.73
Balance, May 31, 2017
83
$39.18
Granted
44
$47.42
Vested and Issued
(27)
$39.10
Canceled
(11)
$41.97
Balance, May 31, 2018
89
$42.93
Granted
53
$42.47
Vested and Issued
(31)
$41.85
Canceled
(12)
$42.97
Balance, May 31, 2019
99
$43.01

text: The following table summarizes restricted stock-based award activity, including service-based awards and performance-based awards, granted pursuant to Oracle-based stock plans and stock plans assumed from our acquisitions for our last three fiscal years ended May 31, 2019 :
text: The total grant date fair value of restricted stock-based awards that were vested and issued in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1.3 billion, $1.0 billion and $715 million, respectively. As of May 31, 2019, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock-based awards was $2.8 billion and is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.68 years.
text: No PSUs were granted in each of fiscal 2019 and 2018. In fiscal 2017, 1.7 million PSUs were granted which vest upon the attainment of certain performance metrics and service-based vesting. Based upon actual attainment relative to the “target” performance metric, certain participants have the ability to be issued up to 150% of the target number of PSUs originally granted, or to be issued no PSUs at all. In fiscal 2019, 2.4 million PSUs vested and 1.3 million PSUs remained outstanding as of May 31, 2019.

Questions:
question: How many PSUs were granted in fiscal 2019?
answer: No PSUs were granted in each of fiscal 2019 and 2018.
question: How many PSUs remained outstanding as of May 31, 2019?
answer: In fiscal 2019, 2.4 million PSUs vested and 1.3 million PSUs remained outstanding as of May 31, 2019.
question: When does the company's fiscal year end?
answer: May 31
question: How many shares were granted over the 3 year period from 2017 to 2019 ?
answer: 139
derivation: (42+44+53)
scale: million
question: What is the average total grant date fair value of restricted stock-based awards that were vested and issued in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, in millions?
answer: 1005
derivation: (($1.3 billion +$1.0 billion +$715 million)/3)
scale: million
question: What is the total grant date fair value of restricted stock-based awards that were granted in fiscal 2019?
answer: 2250.91
derivation: 53*42.47
scale: million
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
$
$
Deferred revenues and gains (note 2)
28,612
31,324
Guarantee liabilities
10,113
9,434
Asset retirement obligation
31,068
27,759
Pension liabilities
7,238
4,847
In-process revenue contracts
11,866
17,800
Derivative liabilities (note 16)
51,914
56,352
Unrecognized tax benefits (note 22)
62,958
40,556
Office lease liability – long-term (note 1)
10,254
—
Other
2,325
1,325
216,348
189,397

text: Other Long-Term Liabilities
text: In-Process Revenue Contracts
text: As part of the Company’s previous acquisition of FPSO units from Petrojarl ASA (subsequently renamed Teekay Petrojarl AS, or Teekay Petrojarl), the Company assumed a certain FPSO contract with terms that were less favorable than the then prevailing market terms. At the time of the acquisition, the Company recognized a liability based on the estimated fair value of this contract and service obligation.
text: The Company is amortizing the remaining liability over the estimated remaining term of its associated contract on a weighted basis, based on the projected revenue to be earned under the contract.
text: Amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $5.9 million (2018 – $14.5 million, 2017 – $27.2 million), which is included in revenues on the consolidated statements of loss. Amortization of in-process revenue contracts following 2019 is expected to be $5.9 million (2020), $5.9 million (2021) and $5.9 million (2022).
text: (all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, other than share data and unless otherwise indicated)

Questions:
question: What was Amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the year ended December 31, 2019?
answer: $5.9 million
question: What was amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the year 2020?
answer: $5.9 million
question: What was Amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the year 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $14.5 million
$27.2 million
question: What is the change in Deferred revenues and gains from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: -2712
derivation: 28,612-31,324
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Guarantee liabilities from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 679
derivation: 10,113-9,434
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Asset retirement obligation from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 3309
derivation: 31,068-27,759
scale: thousand
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 Years
4-5 Years
More than 5 Years
Contractual cash obligations:
Operating leases
$2,040
$611
$902
$527
$—
Finance software lease obligations
514
214
300
—
—
Wafer purchases (1)
57
57
—
—
—
Other purchase commitments
413
386
27
—
—
Total contractual cash obligations
3,024
1,268
1,229
527
—
Other commercial commitments (2):
Revolving line of credit
15,000
15,000
—
—
—
Total commercial commitments
15,000
15,000
—
—
—
Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments (3)
$18,024
$16,268
$1,229
$527
—

text: Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
text: The following table summarizes our non-cancelable contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of the end of 2019 and the effect such obligations and commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future fiscal periods (in thousands):
text: (1) Certain of our wafer manufacturers require us to forecast wafer starts several months in advance. We are committed to take delivery of and pay for a portion of forecasted wafer volume.
text: (2) Other commercial commitments are included as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of the end of 2019.
text: (3) Does not include unrecognized tax benefits of $2.1 million as of the end of 2019. See Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Questions:
question: What are the respective values of operating leases due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: $611
$902
scale: thousand
question: What are the respective values of finance software lease obligations due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: 214
300
scale: thousand
question: What are the respective values of the company's total contractual cash obligations due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: 1,268
1,229
scale: thousand
question: What is the average operating leases due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: 756.5
derivation: ($611 + $902)/2 
scale: thousand
question: What is the average finance software lease obligations due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: 257
derivation: (214 + 300)/2 
scale: thousand
question: What is the average  total contractual cash obligations due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
answer: 1248.5
derivation: (1,268 + 1,229)/2 
scale: thousand
Associates
2018
2019
As of January 1,
20,800
20,713
Additions
136
158
Share of profit of associates
1,800
1,627
Dividend declared
(2,023)
(878)
As of December 31,
20,713
21,620

text: GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued) For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)      Investment in associates and joint venture consist of the following:
text: The additions of $158 relate to the investment in Gastrade (December 31, 2018: $136). On February 9, 2017, GasLog acquired a 20% shareholding in Gastrade, a private limited company licensed to develop an independent natural gas system offshore Alexandroupolis in Northern Greece utilizing an FSRU along with other fixed infrastructure. GasLog, as well as being a shareholder, will provide operations and maintenance (‘‘O&M’’) services for the FSRU through an O&M agreement which was signed on February 23, 2018.

Questions:
question: How many percent of shareholding in Gastrade did GasLog acquire?
answer: 20%
question: Which country will the development of an independent natural gas system take place?
answer: Greece
question: In which years was the investments recorded for?
answer: 2018
2019
question: In which year was the dividend declared higher?
answer: 2018
derivation: (2,023) > (878)
question: What was the change in additions from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 22
derivation: 158 - 136 
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in share of profit of associates from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -9.61
derivation: (1,627 - 1,800)/1,800 
scale: percent
Cost of revenue
Sales and marketing
Research and development
General and administrative
Total restructuring expense
Employee severance and related payroll taxes
$28
$1,355
$340
$194
$1,917
Facilities closure expenses
.
435
89
524
Legal fees
.
.
.
89
89
$28
$1,790
$429
$283
$2,530

text: Restructuring Expense
text: In October 2019, we began implementing a restructuring plan in our ongoing efforts to reduce operating costs and focus on advanced technologies. The restructuring plan, when complete, is expected to result in a workforce reduction of approximately 5% of our workforce and the closure and consolidation of certain U.S. and international office facilities. We expect to complete the restructuring by the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2020. We recorded restructuring expenses of $2.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2019, which included the following (in thousands)
text: As of December 31, 2019, we had accrued but unpaid restructuring costs of $1.5 million included in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets

Questions:
question: What are the three categories of restructuring expenses?
answer: Employee severance and related payroll taxes
Facilities closure expenses
Legal fees
question: What is the change in workforce as a result of the restructuring?
answer: reduction of approximately 5%
question: What is the restructuring costs incurred by the company?
answer: $2,530
scale: thousand
question: What is the proportion of the cost of revenue and research and development expenses as a percentage of the total restructuring expense?
answer: 18.06
derivation: ($28 + $429)/$2,530 
scale: percent
question: What is the total legal fees and facilities expenses?
answer: 613
derivation: 89+524
scale: thousand
question: What is the total Sales and marketing and General and administrative?
answer: 2073
derivation: 1,790+283
scale: thousand