next-tat/TAT-QA huggingface dataset:
March 31,
2019
2018
Nippon Yttrium Co., Ltd ("NYC")
$8,215
$8,148
NT Sales Co., Ltd ("NTS")
1,218
998
Novasentis
977
2,870
KEMET Jianghai Electronics Components Co., Ltd (“KEMET Jianghai”)
2,515
—
$12,925
$12,016

text: Note 6: Equity Method Investments
text: The following table provides a reconciliation of equity method investments to the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (amounts in thousands):
text: TOKIN's Joint Ventures - NYC and NTS
text: As noted in Note 2, “Acquisitions,” on April 19, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of the remaining 66% economic interest in TOKIN and TOKIN became a 100% owned subsidiary of KEMET. TOKIN had two investments at the time of acquisition: NYC and NTS. The Company accounts for both investments using the equity method due to the related nature of operations and the Company's ability to influence management decisions.
text: NYC was established in 1966 by TOKIN and Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd (“Mitsui”). NYC was established to commercialize yttrium oxides and the Company owns 30% of NYC's stock. The carrying amount of the Company's equity investment in NYC was $8.2 million and $8.1 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
text: NTS was established in 2004 by TOKIN, however subsequent to its formation, TOKIN sold 67% of its stock. NTS provides world-class electronic devices by utilizing global procurement networks and the Company owns 33% of NTS' stock. During the year ended March 31, 2019, a significant portion of NTS' sales were TOKIN’s products. The carrying amount of the Company's equity investment in NTS was $1.2 million and $1.0 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for the reconciliation of equity method investments to the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets?
answer: 2019
2018
question: What was the amount of investments into Novasentis in 2019?
answer: 977
scale: thousand
question: What was the total investments in 2018?
answer: 12,016
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in the investments into Nippon Yttrium Co., Ltd ("NYC") between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 67
derivation: 8,215-8,148
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in the investments into Novasentis between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -1893
derivation: 977-2,870
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in total investments between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 7.56
derivation: (12,925-12,016)/12,016
scale: percent
December 31,
2019
2018
Property records database
$60.1
$59.9
Contract assets
37.8
17.0
Right-of-use assets
26.4
—
Deferred compensation plan related assets
15.2
11.1
Unbilled receivables
3.5
5.0
Prepaid expenses
8.1
18.3
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps
—
6.2
Other
7.7
4.3
Other non-current assets
$158.8
$121.8

text: (11) Other Non-Current Assets
text: Other non-current assets consist of the following (in millions):

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for other non-current assets of the company?
answer: 2019
2018
question: What were the amount of contract assets in 2019?
answer: 37.8
scale: million
question: What was the amount of right-of-use assets in 2019?
answer: 26.4
scale: million
question: What was the change in prepaid expenses between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -10.2
derivation: 8.1-18.3
scale: million
question: What was the change in unbilled receivables between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -1.5
derivation: 3.5-5.0
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the total other non-current assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 30.38
derivation: (158.8-121.8)/121.8
scale: percent
CONSOLIDATED
2019 $’000
2018 $’000
Consolidated income statement
Loss from continuing operations before income tax
(20,111)
(21,033)
Income tax benefit
5,949
6,734
Net loss for the year
(14,162)
(14,299)
Retained earnings at the beginning of the period
4,101
30,790
Transferred in from divested subsidiary
(8,676)
-
Net loss for the year
(14,162)
(14,299)
Dividends paid
-
(12,390)
Retained earnings at the end of the year
(18,737)
4,101

text: 6.4 Deed of cross guarantee
text: Pursuant to the iSelect Deed of Cross Guarantee (“the Deed”) and in accordance with ASIC Class Order 98/1418, the subsidiaries identified with a ‘2’ in note 6.2 are relieved from the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 relating to the preparation, audit and lodgment of their financial reports.
text: iSelect Limited and the subsidiaries identified with a ‘2’ in note 6.2 together are referred to as the “Closed Group”. The Closed Group, with the exception of General Brokerage Services Pty Ltd, Energy Watch Trading Pty Ltd, Procure Power Pty Ltd, Energy Watch Services Pty Ltd and iSelect International Pty Ltd entered into the Deed on 26 June 2013.
text: General Brokerage Services Pty Ltd, Energy Watch Trading Pty Ltd, Procure Power Pty Ltd and Energy Watch Services Pty Ltd entered into the Deed on 1 July 2014, the date they were acquired as part of the Energy Watch Group acquisition. iSelect International entered the Deed on 8 September 2014. The effect of the Deed is that iSelect Limited guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in the event of winding up any of the entities in the Closed Group.
text: The consolidated income statement of the entities that are members of the Closed Group is as follows:

Questions:
question: What is the effect of the Deed?
answer: iSelect Limited guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in the event of winding up any of the entities in the Closed Group
question: What is the income tax benefit in 2019?
answer: 5,949
scale: thousand
question: What is the loss from continuing operations before income tax in 2019?
answer: 20,111
scale: thousand
question: What is the percentage change in the Loss from continuing operations before income tax from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -4.38
derivation: (20,111-21,033)/21,033
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in the income tax benefit from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -11.66
derivation: (5,949-6,734)/6,734
scale: percent
question: In which year is there a greater net loss for the year?
answer: 2018
derivation: Find the year with the greater net loss for the year
VMware Stock Options
Pivotal Stock Options
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share)
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share)
Outstanding, February 3, 2017
1,991
$69.38
39,361
$6.72
Granted
745
13.79
20,323
9.73
Forfeited
(36)
55.44
(2,380)
8.13
Expired
(3)
93.87
(1,290)
6.24
Exercised
(1,050)
53.50
(1,626)
5.99
Outstanding, February 2, 2018
1,647
54.63
54,388
7.82
Granted
574
16.07
2,832
14.03
Special Dividend adjustment
348
n/a
n/a
n/a
Forfeited
(31)
24.44
(2,028)
9.35
Expired
—
—
(273)
7.02
Exercised
(569)
46.73
(9,018)
6.89
Outstanding, February 1, 2019(1)
1,969
36.50
45,901
8.31
Granted(2)
1,571
73.19
—
—
Forfeited(3)
(149)
52.83
(10,822)
10.65
Expired
—
—
(128)
10.10
Exercised(4)
(776)
39.94
(34,951)
7.59
Outstanding, January 31, 2020
2,615
56.58
—
—

text: VMware and Pivotal Stock Options
text: The following table summarizes stock option activity for VMware and Pivotal since February 3, 2017 (shares in thousands):
text: (1) The weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding as of February 1, 2019 reflects the adjustments to the options as a result of the Special Dividend.
text: (2) Stock option granted under the VMware equity plan includes 0.6 million options issued for unvested options assumed as part of the Pivotal acquisition.
text: (3) Stock options forfeited under the Pivotal equity plan includes 6.2 million options converted to VMware options as part of the Pivotal acquisition, using a conversion ratio of 0.1.
text: (4) Stock options exercised under the Pivotal equity plan includes 22.4 million of vested options that were settled in cash as part of the Pivotal acquisition.
text: The above table includes stock options granted in conjunction with unvested stock options assumed in business combinations. As a result, the weighted-average exercise price per share may vary from the VMware stock price at time of grant
text: The stock options outstanding as of January 31, 2020 had an aggregate intrinsic value of $239 million based on VMware’s closing stock price as of January 31, 2020.

Questions:
question: What were the stock options outstanding value as of January 31, 2020?
answer: aggregate intrinsic value of $239 million based on VMware’s closing stock price as of January 31, 2020
question: What was the outstanding number of shares for VMware stock options in 2017?
answer: 1,991
scale: thousand
question: What was the number of granted shares from Pivotal Stock Options in 2018?
answer: 2,832
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in outstanding number of shares for VMware Stock Options between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -344
derivation: 1,647-1,991
scale: thousand
question: How many years did the outstanding Weighted-Average Exercise Price (per share) for VMware stock options exceed $60.00?
answer: 1
derivation: 2017
question: What was the percentage change in the outstanding weighted-average exercise price per share for pivotal stock options between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 6.27
derivation: (8.31-7.82)/7.82
scale: percent
Year ended March 31,
Description of AOCI Component
2019
2018
2017
Related Statement of Income Line
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
$(5.6)
$(15.2)
$(1.5)
Other income, net
Amortization of actuarial loss
(1.0)
(0.8)
—
Other income, net
Reclassification of realized transactions, net of taxes
$(6.6)
$(16.0)
$(1.5)
Net Income

text: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
text: The table below details where reclassifications of realized transactions out of AOCI are recorded on the consolidated statements of income (amounts in millions).

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for reclassifications of realized transactions out of AOCI are recorded on the consolidated statements of income?
answer: 2019
2018
2017
question: What were the Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities in 2017?
answer: (1.5)
scale: million
question: What was the Amortization of actuarial loss in 2019?
answer: (1.0)
scale: million
question: What was the change in the Amortization of actuarial loss between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -0.2
derivation: -1.0-(-0.8)
scale: million
question: What was the change in the Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -13.7
derivation: -15.2-(-1.5)
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the Reclassification of realized transactions, net of taxes between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -58.75
derivation: (-6.6-(-16.0))/-16.0
scale: percent
€ thousands
2019
2018
2017
Total compensation
3,770
3,702
3,663
Thereof fixed compensation
3,218
3,162
3,135
Thereof committee remuneration
553
540
528

text: The total annual compensation of the Supervisory Board members is as follows:
text: Supervisory Board Compensation
text: The Supervisory Board members do not receive any share-based payment for their services. As far as members who are employee representatives on the Supervisory Board receive share-based payment, such compensation is for their services as employees only and is unrelated to their status as members of the Supervisory Board.

Questions:
question: What was the total compensation in 2019?
answer: 3,770
scale: thousand
question: What was the  Thereof committee remuneration  in 2018?
answer: 540
scale: thousand
question: In which years was the total annual compensation calculated in?
answer: 2019
2018
2017
question: In which year was the amount Thereof committee remuneration the largest?
answer: 2019
derivation: 553>540>528
question: What was the change in the amount Thereof committee remuneration in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 13
derivation: 553-540
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in the amount Thereof committee remuneration in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 2.41
derivation: (553-540)/540
scale: percent
Telkomsel
AIS
Airtel (1)
Globe
Country mobile penetration rate
123%
139%
90%
138%
Market share, 31 March 2019 (2)
51.1%
45.2%
28.0%
56.6%
Market share, 31 March 2018 (2)
48.5%
44.8%
25.7%
52.1%
Market position (2)
#1
#1
#2
#1
Mobile customers (‘000)
- Aggregate
168,642
41,491
384,078
83,490
- Proportionate
59,025
9,676
144,770
39,307
Growth in mobile customers (3) (%)
-13%
3.6%
-2.9%
32%

text: Notes:
(1) Mobile penetration rate, market share and market position pertained to India market only.
text: (2) Based on number of mobile customers.
text: (3) Compared against 31 March 2018 and based on aggregate mobile customers.

Questions:
question: Which market does the information reflect for Airtel?
answer: India
question: What is the market position of AIS?
answer: #1
question: What is the % growth of mobile customers for AIS?
answer: 3.6%
question: Which associate had the best % growth in mobile customers?
answer: Globe
derivation: 32% > 3.6% > -2.9% > -13%
question: Which associate has the worst market position?
answer: Airtel
derivation: #2 is worse than #1.
question: Which associate had the biggest change in market share from 2018 to 2019?
answer: Globe
derivation: (56.6 - 52.1) % > (51.1 - 48.5) % > (28.0 - 25.7) % > (45.2 - 44.8) %
Year ended December 31,
Variance
2019
2018
$
%
Software Solutions
$412.7
$394.8
$17.9
5%
Data and Analytics
123.4
115.0
8.4
7%
Corporate and Other
109.9
115.6
(5.7)
(5)%
Total
$646.0
$625.4
$20.6
3%

text: Consolidated Financial Results
text: Operating Expenses
text: The following table sets forth operating expenses by segment for the periods presented (in millions):
text: The increase in Operating Expenses was primarily driven by higher net personnel costs, technology-related costs and acquisition-related costs in our Software Solutions segment. The increase in our Data and Analytics segment primarily related to higher net personnel costs and higher data costs related to revenue growth. The decrease in Corporate and Other was primarily driven by lower incentive bonus expense.

Questions:
question: What was the main reason for the increase in Operating Expenses?
answer: higher net personnel costs, technology-related costs and acquisition-related costs in our Software Solutions segment.
question: What was the primary reason for the decrease in Corporate and Other?
answer: lower incentive bonus expense
question: Which years does the table provide information for the company's operating expenses by segment?
answer: 2019
2018
question: What was the difference in the percent variance between Software Solutions and Data and Analytics?
answer: 2
derivation: 7-5
scale: percent
question: What was the average revenue from Corporate and Other between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 112.75
derivation: (109.9+115.6)/2
scale: million
question: What was the average  operating expenses between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 635.7
derivation: (646.0+625.4)/2
scale: million
Name
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or  Units (#)
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
Threshold ($)
Target ($)
Maximum ($)
Barry Litwin
-
100,238
1,113,750
1,237,500
Thomas Clark
-
5,062
225,000
337,500
Robert Dooley
-
13,837
615,000
922,500
Eric Lerner
-
6,773
300,900
451,350
Manoj Shetty
-
5,435
241,535
362,303
Lawrence Reinhold
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

text: Grants of Plan-Based Awards
text: The following table sets forth the estimated possible payouts under the cash incentive awards granted to our Named
Executive Officers in respect of 2019 performance under the 2019 NEO Plan.
text: (1) Amounts presented assume payment of threshold, target and maximum awards at the applicable level.

Questions:
question: What is the maximum estimated future payouts under the 2019 NEO plan for Barry Litwin and Thomas Clark?
answer: 1,237,500
337,500
question: What is the maximum estimated future payouts under the 2019 NEO plan for Robert Dooley and Eric Lerner?
answer: 922,500
451,350
question: What is the maximum estimated future payouts under the 2019 NEO plan for Manoj Shetty and Lawrence Reinhold?
answer: 362,303
N/A
question: What is the difference between Manoj Shetty's estimated maximum and target payouts in the future under the 2019 NEO Plan?
answer: 120768
derivation: 362,303 - 241,535 
question: What is Eric Lerner's threshold estimated future payouts under the 2019 NEO plan as a percentage of Thomas Clark's threshold payouts?
answer: 133.8
derivation: 6,773/5,062 
scale: percent
question: What is the total target payout under the 2019 NEO Plan for the highest and lowest paying Named Executive Officer under the 2019 NEO Plan?
answer: 1338750
derivation: 1,113,750 + 225,000
As of December 31,
2019
2018(1)
Amount
% of total
Amount
% of total
United States
$385,302
85%
$426,321
85%
Singapore
63,556
14%
71,945
14%
Rest of world
5,034
1%
3,368
1%
Total
$453,892
100%
$501,634
100%

text: The determination of which country a particular sale is allocated to is based on the destination of the product shipment. No other individual country accounted for more than 10% of net revenue during these periods. Although a large percentage of the Company’s products is shipped to Asia, and in particular, China, the Company believes that a significant number of the systems designed by customers and incorporating the Company’s semiconductor products are subsequently sold outside Asia to Europe, Middle East, and Africa, or EMEA markets and North American markets.
text: Long-lived assets, which consists of property and equipment, net, leased right-of-use assets, intangible assets, net, and goodwill, by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
text: (1) Amounts do not include leased right-of-use assets in the prior period due to the adoption of ASC 842 under the modified retrospective method with a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019.

Questions:
question: What was the respective amount in 2019 and 2018 from Singapore?
answer: 63,556
71,945
scale: thousand
question: What was the respective amount in 2019 and 2018 from United States?
answer: $385,302
$426,321
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage of total from Singapore in 2019?
answer: 14
scale: percent
question: What was the change in the United States amount from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -41019
derivation: 385,302 - 426,321
scale: thousand
question: What was the average amount from Singapore in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 67750.5
derivation: (63,556 + 71,945) / 2
scale: thousand
question: What was the average total amount in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 477763
derivation: (453,892 + 501,634) / 2
scale: thousand
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
Cost of services 
$15,884
$15,335
$ 549
3.6%
Cost of wireless equipment 
18,219
18,763
(544)
(2.9)
Selling, general and administrative expense 
16,639
15,701
938
6.0
Depreciation and amortization expense 
11,353
11,952
(599)
(5.0)
Total Operating Expenses 
$ 62,095
$ 61,751
$ 344
0.6

text: Operating Expenses
text: Cost of Services Cost of services increased $549 million, or 3.6%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to increases in rent expense as a result of adding capacity to the networks to support demand as well as an increase due to the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in 2019, increases in costs related to the device protection package offered to our wireless retail postpaid customers, as well as regulatory fees.
text: These increases were partially offset by decreases in employee-related costs primarily due to the Voluntary Separation Program, as well as decreases in access costs and roaming.
text: Cost of Wireless Equipment Cost of wireless equipment decreased $544 million, or 2.9%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily as a result of declines in the number of wireless devices sold as a result of an elongation of the handset upgrade cycle. These decrease were partially offset by a shift to higher priced devices in the mix of wireless devices sold.
text: Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense increased $938 million, or 6.0%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to increases in sales commission and bad debt expense, and an increase in advertising costs. The increase in sales commission expense during 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to a lower net deferral of commission costs as a result of the adoption of Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach.
text: These increases were partially offset by decreases in employee-related costs primarily due to the Voluntary Separation Program.
text: Depreciation and Amortization Expense Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $599 million, or 5.0%, during 2019 compared to 2018, driven by the change in the mix of total Verizon depreciable assets and Consumer’s usage of those assets.

Questions:
question: How much did Cost of services increase in 2019?
answer: $549 million
question: What is the total operating expenses in 2019?
answer: $ 62,095
scale: million
question: How much did Cost of wireless equipment decrease in 2019?
answer: $544 million
question: What is the change in Cost of services from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 549
derivation: 15,884-15,335
scale: million
question: What is the change in Cost of wireless equipment from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -544
derivation: 18,219-18,763
scale: million
question: What is the change in Total Operating Expenses from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 344
derivation: 62,095-61,751
scale: million
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$ 591
$ 589
Due after one year through five years
644
642
Due after five years through ten years
455
452
$ 1,690
$ 1,683

text: The following table presents the contractual maturities of our debt investments as of April 26, 2019 (in millions):
text: Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

Questions:
question: What type of cost and value information does the table provide about the contractual maturities of our debt investments as of April 26, 2019?
answer: Amortized Cost
Fair Value
question: What was the amortized cost Due after one year through five years?
answer: 644
scale: million
question: What was the total fair value debt?
answer: 1,683
scale: million
question: What was the amortized cost that was due in one year or less as a ratio of the fair value for the same period?
answer: 100.34
derivation: 591/589
scale: percent
question: What was the difference between the amortized cost and fair value that was due after five years through ten years?
answer: 3
derivation: 455-452
scale: million
question: What was the difference in the total amortized cost and fair value?
answer: 7
derivation: 1,690-1,683
scale: million