next-tat/TAT-QA huggingface dataset:
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Reconciliation of free cash flow:
Net cash provided by operating activities
$115,549
$90,253
$67,510
Capital expenditures
(18,034)
(14,895)
(7,100)
Capitalized software costs
(24,668)
(25,515)
(20,571)
Free cash flow
$72,847
$49,843
$39,839
Free cash flow margin
12.6%
9.3%
8.3%

text: Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities and Free Cash Flow
text: The following table presents a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow (in thousands, except for percentages):
text: Net cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was $115.5 million as compared to $90.3 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to improved profitability, improved collections, and other working capital changes in 2019 when compared to the same period in 2018.
text: Free cash flow for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was $72.8 million, resulting in a free cash flow margin of 12.6%, as compared to free cash flow of $49.8 million and a free cash flow margin of 9.3% for the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to both improved profitability and collections, and is partially offset by cash paid for interest on our convertible notes of $17.4 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Refer to the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information on the convertible notes.

Questions:
question: What was the reason behind the increase of net cash provided by operating activities between 2018 and 2019?
answer: The increase was primarily due to improved profitability, improved collections, and other working capital changes
question: What was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
answer: $67,510
scale: thousand
question: What was the free cash flow in 2019?
answer: $72,847
scale: thousand
question: What was the average net cash provided by operating activities from 2017-2019?
answer: 91104
derivation: ($115,549+$90,253+$67,510)/(2019-2017+1)
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in free flow cash margin between 2017 and 2018?
answer: 1
derivation: (9.3%-8.3%)
scale: percent
question: What was the change in free cash flow between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 23004
derivation: ($72,847-$49,843)
scale: thousand
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2018
2019
Gross Accounts Receivable - Trade
$300,016
$273,053
Less
Allowances for doubtful accounts
1,893
1,276
Stock rotation and ship from stock and debit
15,989
14,140
Sales returns and discounts
6,875
646
Total allowances
24,757
16,062
Accounts Receivable - Trade, net
$275,259
$256,991

text: 5. Trade Accounts Receivable and Contract Liabilities:
text: Charges related to allowances for doubtful accounts are charged to selling, general, and administrative expenses. Charges related to stock rotation, ship from stock and debit, sales returns, and sales discounts are reported as deductions from revenue. Please refer to Note 6, “Revenue Recognition,” for additional information

Questions:
question: Where are charges related to allowances for doubtful accounts are charged to?
answer: Charged to selling, general, and administrative expenses
question: Where are charges related to stock rotation, ship from stock and debit, sales returns, and sales discounts are reported as?
answer: Reported as deductions from revenue.
question: What is the company's allowances for doubtful accounts in 2019?
answer: 1,276
question: What is the total allowances for doubtful accounts in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 3169
derivation: 1,893 + 1,276 
question: What is the percentage change in net accounts receivable - trade between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -6.64
derivation: (256,991 - 275,259)/275,259 
scale: percent
question: What is the total allowances in 2018 as a percentage of the gross accounts receivable - trade?
answer: 8.25
derivation: 24,757/300,016 
scale: percent
At December 31,
2019
2018
Cash
$437
$268
Foreign government treasury bills
37
32
Money market funds
5,320
3,925
Cash and cash equivalents
$5,794
$4,225

text: 4. Cash and Cash Equivalents
text: The following table summarizes the components of our cash and cash equivalents (amounts in millions):

Questions:
question: What was the cash amount in 2019?
answer: 437
scale: million
question: What was the foreign government treasure bills amount in 2019?
answer: 37
scale: million
question: What was the amount of cash and cash equivalents in 2018?
answer: 4,225
scale: million
question: What was the change in cash between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 169
derivation: 437-268
scale: million
question: What was the change in money market funds between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 1395
derivation: (5,320-3,925)
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in cash and cash equivalents between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 37.14
derivation: ($5,794-$4,225)/$4,225
scale: percent
Year Ended January 3, 2020
Defense Solutions
Civil
Health
Total
(in millions)
Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee
$3,697
$1,997
$234
$5,928
Firm-fixed-price
1,203
1,075
1,296
3,574
Time-and-materials and fixed-price-level-of-effort
466
564
444
1,474
Total
$5,366
$3,636
$1,974
$10,976

text: The majority of the Company's revenues are generated from U.S. government contracts, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to other contractors. Revenues from the U.S. government can be adversely impacted by spending caps or changes in budgetary priorities of the U.S. government, as well as delays in program start dates or the award of a contract.
text: Disaggregated revenues by contract-type were as follows:

Questions:
question: Where are the Company's majority revenues generated from?
answer: U.S. government contracts, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to other contractors.
question: What was the Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee in Defense Solutions, Civil and Health respectively?
answer: $3,697
$1,997
$234
scale: million
question: What was the total Firm-fixed-price?
answer: 3,574
scale: million
question: In which category was Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee more than 1,000 million?
answer: Defense Solutions
Civil
derivation: locate and analyze Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee in row 5
question: What was the difference in the Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price-incentive-fee between Civil and Health?
answer: 1763
derivation: 1,997 - 234
scale: million
question: What was the average Firm-fixed-price under Solutions, Civil and Health?
answer: 1191.33
derivation: (1,203 + 1,075 + 1,296) / 3
scale: million
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (1)
Option Awards ($)
All Other Compensation ($) (2)
Total ($)
Robert D. Rosenthal
95,000
40,000
-
25,900
160,900
Chad M. Lindbloom
95,00
40,000
-
13,800
148,800
Paul S. Pearlman
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850
Lawrence Reinhold
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850

text: Non-Management Director Compensation in Fiscal 2019
text: The non-management directors received the following compensation during fiscal 2019:
text: (1) This column represents the fair value of the stock award on the grant date determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718. As per SEC rules relating to executive compensation disclosure, the amounts shown exclude the impact of forfeitures related to service based vesting conditions. For additional information regarding assumptions made in calculating the amount reflected in this column, please refer to Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2019.
text: (2) Dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock.

Questions:
question: What is the total compensation received by Robert D. Rosenthal and Chad M. Lindbloom respectively during fiscal 2019?
answer: 160,900
148,800
question: What is the total compensation received by Paul S. Pearlman and Lawrence Reinhold respectively during fiscal 2019?
answer: 105,850
105,850
question: What does stock awards refer to?
answer: Represents the fair value of the stock award on the grant date determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.
question: What is the total compensation received by Robert D. Rosenthal and Chad M. Lindbloom during fiscal 2019?
answer: 309700
derivation: 160,900 + 148,800 
question: What is the total compensation received by Paul S. Pearlman and Lawrence Reinhold during fiscal 2019?
answer: 211700
derivation: 105,850 + 105,850 
question: What is the percentage of Pearlman's fees earned in cash as a percentage of his total compensation during fiscal 2019?
answer: 61.41
derivation: 65,000/105,850 
scale: percent
($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018*
2017*
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent/ Margin Change
Global Technology Services
External total gross profit
$10,035
$10,022
0.1%
External total gross profit margin
34.4%
34.3%
0.1 pts
Pre-tax income
$ 1,781
$ 2,618
(32.0)%
Pre-tax margin
5.9%
8.8%
(2.8) pts

text: * Recast to reflect segment changes.
text: The 2018 GTS gross profit margin was essentially flat year to year and reflected benefits from productivity initiatives, including automation of delivery processes infused with AI and global workforce optimization.
text: Pre-tax income performance reflected continued investment to expand go-to-market capabilities and develop new offerings for the hybrid market.

Questions:
question: What are the benefits reflected from gross profit margin?
answer: The 2018 GTS gross profit margin was essentially flat year to year and reflected benefits from productivity initiatives
question: What does the productivity initiatives include?
answer: automation of delivery processes infused with AI and global workforce optimization.
question: What does the Pre-tax income performance implied? 
answer: Pre-tax income performance reflected continued investment to expand go-to-market capabilities and develop new offerings for the hybrid market.
question: What is the average of External total gross profit?
answer: 10028.5
derivation: (10,035+10,022) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in External total gross profit from 2017 to 2018
answer: 13
derivation: 10,035-10,022
scale: million
question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Pre-tax income from 2017 to 2018
answer: -837
derivation: 1,781-2,618 
scale: million
(dollars in millions)
At December 31,
2019
2018
Projected benefit obligation
$ 21,190
$ 19,510
Accumulated benefit obligation
21,134
19,461
Fair value of plan assets
19,388
17,757

text: 2016 Collective Bargaining Negotiations
text: During 2016, we adopted changes to our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to reflect the agreed upon terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreements ratified in June 2016. The impact includes a net increase to Accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.9 billion (net of taxes of $1.8 billion).
text: The amount recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified to net periodic benefit cost on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of the respective plans’ participants, which, on a weighted-average basis, is 12.2 years for defined benefit pension plans and 7.8 years for other postretirement benefit plans.
text: The above-noted reclassification resulted in a decrease to net periodic benefit cost and increase to pre-tax income of approximately $658 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets follows:
text: Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets follows:

Questions:
question: What was the net increase to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016?
answer: $2.9 billion
question: What is the duration of postretirement benefit plan over which the amount will be reclassified?
answer: 7.8 years
question: What was the projected benefit obligation in 2019?
answer: $ 21,190
scale: million
question: What is the change in the projected benefit obligation from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1680
derivation: 21,190 - 19,510
scale: million
question: What was the average accumulated benefit obligation for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 20297.5
derivation: (21,134 + 19,461) / 2
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the fair value of plan assets from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 9.19
derivation: 19,388 / 17,757 - 1
scale: percent
K operations
2019
2018
Biogas (MWh)
17,045
15,958
Natural gas (MWh)
238,081
278,849
PG (MWh)
866
1,513
Fuel oils (MWh)
580
648
Coal (MWh)
0
0
Electricity (MWh)
195,796
196,965
Heat and steam (MWh)
212,482
272,985
Total energy (MWh)(a)
408,280
469,950
Total Scope 1 emissions (tonnes CO2e)
48,178
56,533
Total Scope 2 emissions (tonnes COe)(b)2
702
3,067

text: Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting
text: We have decided to voluntarily comply with the UK government’s Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) policy a year early. The table below represents Unilever’s energy use and associated GHG emissions from electricity and fuel in the UK for the 2018 and 2019 reporting years (1 October to 30 September), with scope calculations aligned to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The scope of this data includes 8 manufacturing sites and 11 non-manufacturing sites based in the UK. The UK accounts for 5% of our global total Scope 1 and 2 emissions, outlined in our mandatory GHG reporting also on this page.
text: (a) Fleet and associated diesel use excluded. Transportation is operated by a
third party and accounted for under Scope 3.
text: (b) Carbon emission factors for grid electricity calculated according to the marketbased method'
text: For further information on energy efficiency measures taken to reduce our carbon
emissions, please see page 19.

Questions:
question: How is the carbon emission factor for grid calculated?
answer: Carbon emission factors for grid electricity calculated according to the marketbased method'
question: UK accounts for what percentage of Total Scope 1 and 2?
answer: 5%
question: In which scope is transportation included?
answer: Scope 3
question: What is the increase in the Biogas from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1087
derivation: 17,045 - 15,958
question: What is the average total energy?
answer: 439115
derivation: (408,280 + 469,950) / 2
question: What is the percentage increase / (decrease) in Fuel Oils from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -10.49
derivation: 580 / 648 - 1
scale: percent
Fiscal Year
($ in millions)
2018
2017
Net sales
$2,157.7
$1,797.6
Less: surcharge revenue
365.4
239.2
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue
$1,792.3
$1,558.4
Operating income
$189.3
$121.5
Special items:
Loss on divestiture of business
—
3.2
Adjusted operating income excluding special items
$189.3
$124.7
Operating margin
8.8%
6.8%
Adjusted operating margin excluding surcharge revenue and special items
10.6%
8.0%

text: Operating Income
text: Our operating income in fiscal year 2018 increased to $189.3 million, or 8.8 percent of net sales as compared with $121.5 million, or 6.8 percent in net sales in fiscal year 2017. Excluding surcharge revenue and special items, adjusted operating margin was 10.6 percent for the fiscal year 2018 and 8.0 percent for fiscal year 2017. The increase in the operating margin reflects the stronger demand and improved product mix coupled with operating cost improvements partially offset by higher variable compensation expense compared to fiscal year 2017.
text: Operating income has been impacted by special items. The following presents our operating income and operating margin, in each case excluding the impact of surcharge on net sales and the loss on divestiture of business. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of these items provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.

Questions:
question: What was operating income in 2018?
answer: $189.3 million
question: What was operating income in 2017 as a percentage of net sales?
answer: 6.8 percent
question: In which years was operating income calculated?
answer: 2018
2017
question: In which year was the operating margin larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 8.8%>6.8%
question: What was the change in operating income in 2018 from 2017?
answer: 67.8
derivation: 189.3-121.5
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in operating income in 2018 from 2017?
answer: 55.8
derivation: (189.3-121.5)/121.5
scale: percent
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name (1)
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (2)
Total ($)
Keith Barnes
102,500
178,317
280,817
Richard E. Belluzzo
160,000
178,317
338,317
Laura Black
67,500
178,317
245,817
Tor Braham
67,500
178,317
245,817
Timothy Campos
77,500
178,317
255,817
Donald Colvin
97,500
178,317
275,817
Masood A. Jabbar
90,000
178,317
268,317

text: The director compensation policies summarized above resulted in the following total compensation for our non-management directors in fiscal year 2019:
text: Director Compensation Table
text: (1) Oleg Khaykin, President and Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table as he was an employee of the Company and as such received no compensation for his services as a director. His compensation is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.
text: (2) The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of RSUs issued pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. There can be no assurance that these grant date fair values will ever be realized by the non-employee directors. For information regarding the number of unvested RSUs held by each non-employee director as of the end of fiscal year 2019, see the column “Unvested Restricted Stock Units Outstanding” in the table below

Questions:
question: How much did Keith Barnes earn in cash?
answer: 102,500
question: How much did Donald Colvin earn in cash?
answer: 97,500
question: Why was Oleg Khaykin not included in the table?
answer: he was an employee of the Company and as such received no compensation for his services as a director.
question: What is the difference between  Richard E. Belluzzo's total compensation as compared to Laura Black?
answer: 92500
derivation: (338,317-245,817)
question: What is the summed compensation for the top 3 most compensated directors?
answer: 894951
derivation: (338,317+280,817+275,817)
question: What is the percentage difference of the total compensation between Timothy Campos and Tor Braham?
answer: 4.07
derivation: (255,817-245,817)/245,817
scale: percent
Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Cost of product revenues
$ 4
$ 3
$ 4
Cost of hardware maintenance and other services revenues
10
10
13
Sales and marketing
67
68
84
Research and development
48
49
59
General and administrative
29
31
35
Total stock-based compensation expense
$ 158
$ 161
$ 195
Income tax benefit for stock-based compensation
$ 15
$ 29
$ 41

text: Stock-Based Compensation Expense
text: Stock-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated statements of operations as follows (in millions):
text: As of April 26, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to our equity awards was $285 million, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining service period of 2.1 years.

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for the company's stock-based compensation expense?
answer: 2019
2018
2017
question: What was the cost of product revenues in 2019?
answer: 4
scale: million
question: How many years did the sales and marketing expense exceed $60 million?
answer: 3
derivation: 2019##2018##2017
question: What would be the change in Research and development expense between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -10
derivation: 49-59
scale: million
question: What would be the percentage change in General and administrative expense between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -6.45
derivation: (29-31)/31
scale: percent
question: What would be the total unrecognized compensation expense related to the company's equity awards?
answer: $285 million
December 31, 2019
Gross Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Net Cost
Technologies & licenses
699
(578)
121
Purchased & internally developed software
486
(427)
59
Technologies in progress
119
—
119
Other intangible assets
70
(70)
—
Total
1,374
(1,075)
299
December 31, 2018
Gross Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Net Cost
Technologies & licenses
705
(592)
113
Purchased & internally developed software
459
(404)
55
Technologies in progress
44
—
44
Other intangible assets
69
(69)
—
Total
1,277
(1,065)
212

text: As described in Note 7, the acquisition of Norstel resulted in the recognition of technology in process for $86 million in the line “Technologies in progress”.
text: The line “Technologies in progress” in the table above also includes internally developed software under construction and software not ready for use.
text: The amortization expense in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $69 million, $64 million and $58 million, respectively.

Questions:
question: What does Technologies in progress in the table include?
answer: includes internally developed software under construction and software not ready for use.
question: How much was the amortization expense in 2019?
answer: $69 million
question: How much was the amortization expense in 2018?
answer: $64 million
question: What is the average Gross Cost?
answer: 1325.5
derivation: (1,374+1,277) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average Accumulated Amortization?
answer: 1070
derivation: (1,075+1,065) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average Net Cost?
answer: 255.5
derivation: (299+212) / 2
scale: million
As of June 30,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(U.S. $ in thousands)
*As Adjusted
*As Adjusted
Cash and cash equivalents
$1,268,441
$1,410,339
$244,420
$259,709
$187,094
Short-term investments
445,046
323,134
305,499
483,405
30,251
Derivative assets
215,233
99,995
3,252
—
—
Working capital
(287,597)
1,377,145
296,984
542,038
50,477
Total assets
2,977,258
2,421,828
1,282,117
990,973
397,161
Deferred revenue
468,820
342,871
245,195
181,068
136,565
Derivative liabilities
855,079
207,970
—
—
—
Exchangeable senior notes, net
853,576
819,637
—
—
—
Total liabilities
2,411,791
1,514,508
379,424
259,310
207,107
Share capital
24,199
23,531
22,726
21,620
18,461
Total equity
565,467
907,320
902,693
731,663
190,054

text: Consolidated Statements of Financial Position Data:
text: * Adjusted IFRS balances to reflect the impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15. See Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

Questions:
question: What do the adjusted IFRS balances reflect?
answer: The impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15
question: What are the share capital for the years as of June 30, 2015 to 2019 in chronological order?
answer: 18,461
21,620
22,726
23,531
24,199
scale: thousand
question: What are the short-term investments for the years as of June 30, 2015 to 2019 in chronological order?
answer: 30,251
483,405
305,499
323,134
445,046
scale: thousand
question: What is the difference in the value of short-term investments between fiscal years 2018 and 2019?
answer: 121912
derivation: 445,046-323,134
scale: thousand
question: What is the average  Total equity  for fiscal years 2015 to 2019?
answer: 659439.4
derivation: ( 565,467 + 907,320+ 902,693 + 731,663 + 190,054  )/5
scale: thousand
question: What is the average  Cash and cash equivalents for 2015-2019?
answer: 674000.6
derivation: (1,268,441+1,410,339+244,420+259,709+187,094)/5
scale: thousand