next-tat/TAT-QA huggingface dataset:
Years Ended
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Revenue:
Americas  .
$30,927
$29,070
$28,351
EMEA  .
13,100
12,425
12,004
APJC .
7,877
7,834
7,650
Total
$51,904
$49,330
$48,005
Gross margin:
Americas .
$20,338
$18,792
$18,284
EMEA  .
8,457
7,945
7,855
APJC .
4,683
4,726
4,741
Segment total .
33,479
31,463
30,880
Unallocated corporate items .
(813)
(857)
(656)
Total
$32,666
$30,606
$30,224

text: (a) Revenue and Gross Margin by Segment
text: We conduct business globally and are managed on a geographic basis consisting of three segments: the Americas, EMEA, and APJC. Our management makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from our internal management system. Sales are attributed to a segment based on the ordering location of the customer. We do not allocate research and development, sales and marketing, or general and administrative expenses to our segments in this internal management system because management does not include the information in our measurement of the performance of the operating segments. In addition, we do not allocate amortization and impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets, sharebased compensation expense, significant litigation settlements and other contingencies, charges related to asset impairments and restructurings, and certain other charges to the gross margin for each segment because management does not include this information in our measurement of the performance of the operating segments.
text: Summarized financial information by segment for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, based on our internal management system and as utilized by our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), is as follows (in millions):
text: Amounts may not sum and percentages may not recalculate due to rounding.
text: Revenue in the United States was $27.4 billion, $25.5 billion, and $25.0 billion for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Questions:
question: What was the revenue in the United States for fiscal 2018?
answer: $25.5 billion
question: What are the regions that the company operates in?
answer: Americas
EMEA
APJC
question: What was the gross margin from Americas in 2019?
answer: 20,338
scale: million
question: What was the change in the gross margin from APJC between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -15
derivation: 4,726-4,741
scale: million
question: How many years did total revenue from all segments exceed $50,000 million?
answer: 1
derivation: 2019
question: What was the percentage change in the total gross margin from all segments between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 6.73
derivation: (32,666-30,606)/30,606
scale: percent
(In millions)
2020
2021-2022
2023-2024
Thereafter
Total
Long-term debt: (a)
Principal payments
$ 5,518
$ 11,744
$ 8,000
$ 47,519
$ 72,781
Interest payments
2,299
4,309
3,818
29,383
39,809
Construction commitments (b)
3,443
515
0
0
3,958
Operating leases, including imputed interest (c)
1,790
3,144
2,413
3,645
10,992
Finance leases, including imputed interest (c)
797
2,008
2,165
9,872
14,842
Transition tax (d)
1,180
2,900
4,168
8,155
16,403
Purchase commitments (e)
17,478
1,185
159
339
19,161
Other long-term liabilities (f)
0
72
29
324
425
Total
$  32,505
$  25,877
$  20,752
$  99,237
$  178,371

text: Contractual Obligations
text: The following table summarizes the payments due by fiscal year for our outstanding contractual obligations as of June 30, 2019:
text: (a) Refer to Note 11 – Debt of the Notes to Financial Statements.
text: (b) Refer to Note 7 – Property and Equipment of the Notes to Financial Statements.
text: (c) Refer to Note 15 – Leases of the Notes to Financial Statements.
text: (d) Refer to Note 12 – Income Taxes of the Notes to Financial Statements.
text: (e) Amounts represent purchase commitments, including open purchase orders and take-or-pay contracts that are not presented as construction commitments above.
text: (f) We have excluded long-term tax contingencies, other tax liabilities, and deferred income taxes of $14.2 billion from the amounts presented as the timing of these obligations is uncertain. We have also excluded unearned revenue and non-cash items.

Questions:
question: Why has $14.2 billion been excluded from other long-term liabilities?
answer: We have excluded long-term tax contingencies, other tax liabilities, and deferred income taxes of $14.2 billion from the amounts presented as the timing of these obligations is uncertain.
question: What do the purchase commitments represent?
answer: Amounts represent purchase commitments, including open purchase orders and take-or-pay contracts that are not presented as construction commitments above.
question: Where can the long-term debt be found?
answer: Refer to Note 11 – Debt of the Notes to Financial Statements.
question: How much do the top 3 contractual obligation terms add up to in 2020?
answer: 26439
derivation: 5,518 + 17,478+3,443
scale: million
question: What are the construction commitments in 2020 as a percentage of the total contractual obligations?
answer: 10.59
derivation: 3,443/32,505
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in interest payments from 2020 to 2021-2022?
answer: 87.43
derivation: (4,309-2,299)/2,299
scale: percent
Number of Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016
1,160,419
$29.93
$14,299
Granted
534,030
$42.90
Exercised
(463,800)
$29.34
$7,203
Cancelled and expired
(61,241)
$33.80
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017
1,169,408
$35.88
$16,731
Granted
466,828
$54.87
Exercised
(420,524)
$30.05
$12,411
Cancelled and expired
(122,312)
$43.85
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018
1,093,400
$45.34
$8,776
Granted
489,947
$63.87
Exercised
(338,748)
$37.94
$9,641
Cancelled and expired
(108,504)
$51.21
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2019
1,136,095
$54.98
$28,291
4 years
Stock options exercisable at December 31, 2019
290,540
$44.90
$10,163
3 years

text: Stock Option Activity - The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, as determined under the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, was $12.07, $10.42 and $6.75, respectively. Option grants that vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 had a combined fair value of $2.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
text: The following table summarizes stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

Questions:
question: What were the weighted-average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively?
answer: $6.75
$10.42
$12.07
question: What was the number of stock options that were outstanding at December 31, 2017?
answer: 1,169,408
question: What was the weighted average remaining contractual life of the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019?
answer: 4 years
question: What is the total value of stock options outstanding on December 31, 2018?
answer: 49574756
derivation: 1,093,400*$45.34 
question: What is the total price of stock options exercised or canceled and expired during the period between December 31, 2018, and 2019?
answer: 18408588.96
derivation: (338,748*37.94)+(108,504*51.21)
question: What is the ratio of stock options exercisable to outstanding on December 31, 2019?
answer: 0.26
derivation: 290,540/1,136,095
(dollars in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Balance at January 1,
$ 2,871
$2,355
$ 1,902
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
149
160
219
Additions for tax positions of prior years
297
699
756
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
(300)
(248)
(419)
Settlements
(58)
(40)
(42)
Lapses of statutes of limitations
(89)
(55)
(61)
Balance at December 31,
$ 2,870
$ 2,871
$ 2,355

text: A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
text: Included in the total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is $2.4 billion, $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, that if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate.

Questions:
question: What was the amount that would favorably affect the effective income tax rate if included in 2019?
answer: $2.4 billion
question: What was the amount that would favorably affect the effective income tax rate if included in 2018?
answer: $2.3 billion
question: What was the amount that would favorably affect the effective income tax rate if included in 2017?
answer: $1.9 billion
question: What was the change in the Additions based on tax positions related to the current year from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -11
derivation: 149 - 160
scale: million
question: What was the average Additions for tax positions of prior years for 2017-2019?
answer: 584
derivation: (297 + 699 + 756) / 3
scale: million
question: What was the average settlements for 2017-2019?
answer: -46.67
derivation: -(58 + 40 + 42) / 3
scale: million
December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of period(1)
$ 150.1
$ 71.5
Gains (losses) on assets still held at end of year
16.8
(16.0)
Purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements(2)
8.3
103.7
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
—
1.0
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
5.0
(10.1)
Balance at end of period(1)
$ 180.2
$ 150.1

text: The following table shows the activity of our U.S. and international plan assets, which are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs.
text: (1) Balances as of December 31, 2018 have been revised from our 2018 Form 10-K filing to reflect changes in leveling classification of specific funds. These reclassifications did not impact the fair value of any of our pension plan assets.
text: (2) Purchases of Level 3 assets in 2018 primarily represent the purchase of bulk annuity contracts (buy-ins) in some of our international plans.

Questions:
question: What does this table represent?
answer: The following table shows the activity of our U.S. and international plan assets, which are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs.
question: Did revising of Balances as of December 31, 2018  from our 2018 Form 10-K filing to reflect changes in leveling classification of specific funds have an impact on the fair value of any of the pension plan assets?
answer: These reclassifications did not impact the fair value of any of our pension plan assets.
question: What years are included in the table?
answer: 2019
2018
question: What is the Balance at beginning of period expressed as a percentage of Balance at end of period for year 2019?
answer: 83.3
derivation: 150.1/180.2
scale: percent
question: What is the difference between the Balance at end of period for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 30.1
derivation: 180.2-150.1
scale: million
question: What is percentage growth of Balance at end of period for year 2018 to 2019?
answer: 20.05
derivation: (180.2-150.1)/150.1
scale: percent
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Years ended December 31,
2019
2018
BASIC AND DILUTED
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
8,844
5,884
Net loss attributable to Neonode Inc.
$(5,298)
$(3,060)
Net loss per share basic and diluted
$(0.60)
$(0.52)

text: 14. Net Loss Per Share
text: Basic net loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was computed by dividing the net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. for the relevant period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. for the relevant period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the year.
text: Potential common stock equivalents of approximately 0 and 350,000 outstanding stock warrants, 0 and 11,000 shares issuable upon conversion of preferred stock and 0 and 0 stock options are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect.

Questions:
question: How did the company compute the basic net loss per common share for 2018 and 2019?
answer: by dividing the net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. for the relevant period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year
question: How do we compute diluted loss per common share?
answer: by dividing net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. for the relevant period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the year
question: What was the net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. in 2018 and 2019?
answer: $(5,298)
$(3,060)
scale: thousand
question: What is the percentage change in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 50.31
derivation: (8,844 - 5,884)/5,884 
scale: percent
question: Which year has the highest net loss per share basic and diluted?
answer: 2019
derivation: -0.60<-0.52
question: What is the ratio of net loss attributable to Neonode Inc. in 2018 compared to 2019?
answer: 0.58
derivation: 3,060/5,298
December 31,
2019
2018
Current:
Domains
$752.7
$686.3
Hosting and presence
526.7
483.3
Business applications
265.0
224.1
$1,544.4
$1,393.7
Noncurrent:
Domains
$382.2
$365.8
Hosting and presence
187.2
180.6
Business applications
85.0
77.4
$ 654.4
$623.8

text: 8. Deferred Revenue
text: Deferred revenue consisted of the following:

Questions:
question: What are the 3 types of non-current deferred revenue?
answer: Domains
Hosting and presence
Business applications
question: What is the 2019 year end total non-current deferred revenue?
answer: 654.4
question: What is the 2018 year end total non-current deferred revenue?
answer: 623.8
question: What is the average total current deferred revenue for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 1469.05
derivation: (1,544.4+1,393.7)/2
question: What is the average total non-current deferred revenue for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 639.1
derivation: (654.4+623.8)/2
question: Was total current or total non-current deferred revenue greater for 2019 year end?
answer: Current
derivation: 1,544.4>654.4
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing
$227,733
$224,635
$240,271
Percent of revenue
39.5%
41.8%
49.9%

text: Sales and Marketing
text: Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.1 million, or 1%, in 2019 as compared to 2018. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense decreased by approximately two percentage points, resulting from the 2018 Reallocation, increased cost efficiency, and leverage realized from changes to our sales commission plans as we continued our efforts to strategically scale our sales teams and improve their productivity.
text: Sales and marketing expenses decreased $15.6 million, or 7%, in 2018 as compared to 2017. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense decreased by approximately eight percentage points, primarily resulting from a combination of increased cost efficiency, reduction in headcount as part of our restructuring activities, and leverage realized from changes to our sales commission plans as we continued our efforts to strategically scale our sales teams and improve their productivity.

Questions:
question: Why did sales and marketing expenses increase between 2018 and 2019?
answer: the 2018 Reallocation, increased cost efficiency, and leverage realized from changes to our sales commission plans as we continued our efforts to strategically scale our sales teams and improve their productivity
question: What was the sales and marketing expense in 2017?
answer: $240,271
scale: thousand
question: What was the sales and marketing expense in 2018?
answer: $224,635
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in sales and marketing between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 3098
derivation: ($227,733-$224,635)
scale: thousand
question: What was the average sales and marketing expense from 2017-2019?
answer: 230879.67
derivation: ($227,733+$224,635+$240,271)/(2019-2017+1)
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in percent of revenue between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -2.3
derivation: (39.5%-41.8%)
scale: percent
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value per share
Total vessel values including newbuildings (broker values)
1,801.5
1,675.1
1,661.1
Committed CAPEX on newbuildings
-51.2
-258.0
-306.9
Cash position
72.5
127.4
134.2
Loans receivables
4.6
-
-
Bunkers
34.8
39.4
33.2
Freight receivables
89.8
86.0
71.3
Other receivables
6.2
7.5
11.8
Other plant and operating equipment
4.3
3.0
1.9
Land and buildings
8.1
-
-
Investments in joint ventures
1.2
0.1
0.3
Prepayments
3.5
2.9
4.4
Borrowings
-863.4
-754.7
-753.9
Trade payables
-47.1
-35.1
-26.2
Other liabilities
-47.3
-36.5
-33.8
Current tax liabilities
-1.5
-1.0
-1.4
Total Net Asset Value (NAV)
1,016.0
856.1
796.0
Total number of shares excluding treasury shares (million)
74.4
73.9
62.0
Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) (USD)
13.6
11.6
12.8

text: Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share):
text: TORM believes that the NAV/share is a relevant measure that Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share. Such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. NAV/share is calculated using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments. NAV/share is calculated as follows:

Questions:
question: What does TORM believe that the NAV/share is a relevant measure for?
answer: Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share.
question: How is NAV/share calculated?
answer: using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments
question: For which years is the Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) calculated?
answer: 2019
2018
2017
question: In which year was the Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) the largest?
answer: 2019
derivation: 13.6>12.8>11.6
question: What was the change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 159.9
derivation: 1,016.0-856.1
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 18.68
derivation: (1,016.0-856.1)/856.1
scale: percent
(In thousands)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Accounts receivable
$90,531
$99,385
Contract assets (1)
$2,812
$3,766
Unearned revenue
$11,963
$17,940
Non-current unearned revenue
$6,012
$5,296

text: Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents contract revenues that have not yet been recognized for contracts with a duration greater than one year. As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any significant performance obligations related to customer contracts that had an original expected duration of one year or more, other than maintenance services, which are satisfied over time. As a practical expedient, for certain contracts recognize revenue equal to the amounts we are entitled to invoice which correspond to the value of completed performance obligations to date. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.3 million as of December 31, 2018. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.6 million as of December 31, 2019, and the Company expects to recognize 64% of such revenue over the next 12 months with the remainder thereafter.
text: The following table provides information about accounts receivables, contract assets and unearned revenue from contracts with customers:
text: (1) Included in other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
text: Of the outstanding unearned revenue balance as of December 31, 2018, $12.7 million was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Questions:
question: How much of the outstanding unearned revenue balance as of December 31, 2018 was recognized as revenue in 2019?
answer: $12.7 million
question: What was the amount of Accounts Receivable in 2019?
answer: $90,531
scale: thousand
question: What was the amount of Unearned revenue in 2019?
answer: $11,963
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in contract assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -954
derivation: $2,812-$3,766
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in non-current unearned revenue between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 716
derivation: $6,012-$5,296
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in unearned revenue between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -33.32
derivation: ($11,963-$17,940)/$17,940
scale: percent
2019
2018
No. of Shares
No. of Shares
Number of shares at beginning of year
114,758
137,227
Number of shares distributed to employees
45,560
42,480
Number of shares transferred to main share registry and/or disposed of
(44,526)
(64,949)
Number of shares at year end
115,792
114,758

text: 16. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
text: a. Employee Share Plan
text: The Employee Share Plan (ESP) is available to all eligible employees each year to acquire ordinary shares in the Company from future remuneration (before tax). Shares to be issued or transferred under the ESP will be valued at the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s shares traded on the Australian Securities Exchange during the five business days immediately preceding the day the shares are issued or transferred. Shares issued under the ESP are not allowed to be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed until the earlier of the end of an initial three-year period, or the participant ceasing continuing employment with the Company.
text: Details of the movement in employee shares under the ESP are as follows:
text: The consideration for the shares issued on 22 May 2019 was $3.72 (7 May 2018: $4.24).

Questions:
question: How much was the consideration for the shares issued on 22 May 2019?
answer: $3.72
question: How much was the consideration for the shares issued on 7 May 2018?
answer: $4.24
question: How many shares were distributed to employees in 2018?
answer: 42,480
question: What was the 2019 percentage change in number of shares distributed to employees?
answer: 7.25
derivation: (45,560 - 42,480) / 42,480 
scale: percent
question: What was the difference between the number of shares at the beginning and end of year 2019?
answer: 1034
derivation: 115,792 - 114,758 
question: What was the average number of shares at year end for both years?
answer: 115275
derivation: (115,792 + 114,758) / 2