next-tat/TAT-QA huggingface dataset:
July 31, 2019 
July 31, 2018
Computer hardware
$17,799
$20,614
Software
6,741
4,664
Capitalized software development costs
7,374
3,978
Equipment and machinery
10,455
4,265
Furniture and fixtures
8,137
4,217
Leasehold improvements
48,191
10,751
    Total property and equipment
98,697
48,489
Less accumulated depreciation
(32,888)
(29,894)
    Property and equipment, net 
$65,809
$18,595

text: Property and Equipment, net
text: Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
text: As of July 31, 2019 and 2018, no property and equipment was pledged as collateral. Depreciation expense, excluding the amortization of software development costs, was $9.7 million, $7.7 million, and $6.6 million for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
text: The Company capitalizes software development costs for technology applications that the Company will offer solely as cloud-based subscriptions, which is primarily comprised of compensation for employees who are directly associated with the software development projects. The Company begins amortizing the capitalized software development costs once the technology applications are available for general release over the estimated lives of the applications, ranging from three to five years.
text: The Company recognized approximately $1.0 million and $0.4 million in amortization expense in cost of revenue - license and subscription on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was no such amortization during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017.

Questions:
question: What was the Depreciation expense, excluding the amortization of software development costs in 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $9.7 million
$7.7 million
$6.6 million
question: What was the value of software in 2019?
answer: 6,741
scale: thousand
question: What was the value of Computer hardware in 2019?
answer: $17,799
scale: thousand
question: In which year was Computer hardware less than 20,000 thousands?
answer: 2019
derivation: locate and analyze computer hardware in row 2
question: What was the average Software value for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 5702.5
derivation: (6,741 + 4,664) / 2
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in the Capitalized software development costs from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 3396
derivation: 7,374 - 3,978
scale: thousand
(Dollars in Millions)
April 27, 2019
April 28, 2018
Net Change ($)
Net Change (%)
Net Sales
$ 57.7
$ 73.2
$ (15.5)
(21.2)%
Gross Profit
$ 7.8
$ 14.3
$ (6.5)
(45.5)%
Income (Loss) from Operations
$ (0.3)
$ 6.0
$ (6.3)
(105.0)%

text: Interface Segment Results
text: Below is a table summarizing results for the fiscal years ended:
text: Net Sales. Interface segment net sales decreased $15.5 million, or 21.2%, to $57.7 million in fiscal 2019, compared to $73.2 million in fiscal 2018. Net sales decreased primarily due to the timing of a major appliance program and reduced sales volumes of legacy data-solution products.
text: Gross Profit. Interface segment gross profit decreased $6.5 million, or 45.5%, to $7.8 million in fiscal 2019, compared to $14.3 million in fiscal 2018. Gross profit margin decreased to 13.5% in fiscal 2019 from 19.5% in fiscal 2018. The decrease primarily relates to lower sales volumes of our appliance products and lower sales volumes and unfavorable sales mix of our data solutions products, partially offset by lower cost of products purchased from Mexico as a result of the weakening of the Mexican peso.
text: Income (Loss) From Operations. Interface segment income from operations decreased $6.3 million, or 105.0%, to a loss of $0.3 million in fiscal 2019, compared to income of $6.0 million in fiscal 2018. The decrease was due to lower gross profit.

Questions:
question: How much was the Interface segment income from operations in fiscal 2019?
answer: Interface segment income from operations decreased $6.3 million, or 105.0%, to a loss of $0.3 million in fiscal 2019
question: What is the average Gross Profit for Fiscal Year Ended April 28, 2018 to Fiscal Year Ended April 27, 2019?
answer: 11.05
derivation: (7.8+14.3) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average Income (Loss) from Operations for Fiscal Year Ended April 28, 2018 to Fiscal Year Ended April 27, 2019?
answer: 3.15
derivation: (0.3+6.0) / 2
scale: million
question: In which period was net sales greater than 70 million?
answer: 2018
derivation: locate and analyze net sales in row 2
question: What was the Gross Profit in 2019 and 2018?
answer: $ 7.8
$ 14.3
scale: million
question: What was the decrease in net sales from interface segment in 2019?
answer: $15.5 million
(in thousands of $)
2019
2018
Balance sheet
Current assets
64,507
172,554
Non-current assets
1,300,065
1,392,710
Current liabilities
(496,029)
(278,728)
Non-current liabilities
(418,578)
(842,786)

text: Summarized financial information of Hilli LLC
text: The assets and liabilities of Hilli LLC(1) that most significantly impacted our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:
text: (1) As Hilli LLC is the primary beneficiary of the Hilli Lessor VIE (see above) the Hilli LLC balances include the Hilli Lessor VIE.

Questions:
question: In which years was the assets and liabilities recorded for?
answer: 2019
2018
question: Who is the primary beneficiary of the Hilli Lessor VIE ?
answer: Hilli LLC
question: What was the current liabilities in 2018?
answer: (278,728)
scale: thousand
question: Which year was the non-current liabilities higher?
answer: 2018
derivation: (842,786) > (418,578)
question: What was the change in current assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -108047
derivation: 64,507 - 172,554 
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in non-current assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -6.65
derivation: (1,300,065 - 1,392,710)/1,392,710 
scale: percent
Year ended December 31,
Variance
2018
2017
$
%
Software Solutions
$567.2
$516.5
$50.7
10%
Data and Analytics
39.5
38.4
1.1
3%

text: EBITDA and EBITDA Margin
text: The following tables set forth EBITDA (in millions) and EBITDA Margin by segment for the periods presented:
text: Software Solutions
text: EBITDA was $567.2 million in 2018 compared to $516.5 million in 2017, an increase of $50.7 million, or 10%, with an EBITDA Margin of 59.0%, an increase of 190 basis points from the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by incremental margins on revenue growth.
text: Data and Analytics
text: EBITDA was $39.5 million in 2018 compared to $38.4 million in 2017, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3%, with an EBITDA Margin of 25.6%, an increase of 30 basis points from the prior year. The EBITDA Margin increase was primarily driven by incremental margins on revenue growth.

Questions:
question: What was increase in EBITDA for Software Solutions?
answer: 50.7
scale: million
question: What was the increase in the EBITDA for Data and Analytics?
answer: 1.1
scale: million
question: Which years does the table provide information for the EBITDA by segment?
answer: 2018
2017
question: How many years did EBITDA for Software Solutions exceed $500 million?
answer: 2
derivation: 2018##2017
question: What was the sum of the EBITDA in 2018?
answer: 606.7
derivation: 567.2+39.5
scale: million
question: Which segments did the percent variance exceed 5%?
answer: Software Solutions
derivation: (Software Solutions:10%)
Estimated Useful Lives (years) (1)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Towers
Up to 20
$13,930.7
$12,777.9
Equipment (2)
2 - 20
1,897.3
1,667.3
Buildings and improvements
3 - 32
638.9
628.5
Land and improvements (3)
Up to 20
2,486.1
2,285.4
Construction-in-progress
372.6
358.1
Total
19,325.6
17,717.2
Less accumulated depreciation
(7,241.2)
(6,470.1)
Property and equipment, net
$12,084.4
$11,247.1

text: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
text: 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
text: Property and equipment (including assets held under finance leases) consisted of the following:
text: (1) Assets on leased land are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the corresponding ground lease taking into consideration lease renewal options and residual value.
text: (2) Includes fiber and DAS assets.
text: (3) Estimated useful lives apply to improvements only.

Questions:
question: What was the estimated useful life of Towers in years?
answer: Up to 20
question: What was the value of Equipment in 2018?
answer: 1,667.3
scale: million
question: What was the value of buildings and improvements in 2019?
answer: 638.9
scale: million
question: What was the change in Land and improvements between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 200.7
derivation: 2,486.1-2,285.4
scale: million
question: What was the change in Construction-in-progress between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 14.5
derivation: 372.6-358.1
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in Property and equipment, net between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 7.44
derivation: ($12,084.4-$11,247.1)/$11,247.1
scale: percent
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Current:
Federal
$(9,627)
$1,423
$26,550
State
882
12
601
Foreign
18,429
13,772
9,621
Total current provision
$9,684
$15,207
$36,772
Deferred:
Federal
$ 3,822
$  4,021
$ 28,297
State
(178)
2,363
(1,000)
Foreign
(2,629)
3,636
(1,979)
Total deferred provision
1,015
10,020
25,318
Total provision for income taxes
$10,699
$25,227
$62,090

text: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
text: The provision for income taxes from continuing operations is summarized as follows:
text: The Company’s effective tax rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, primarily due to the benefit of tax credits and earnings in foreign jurisdictions which are subject to lower tax rates, offset by additional GILTI tax in the US and withholding taxes.

Questions:
question: Which periods does the company's effective tax rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate?
answer: December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
question: What was the current provision for Federal taxes in 2018?
answer: $1,423
scale: thousand
question: What was the current provision for Foreign taxes in 2019?
answer: 18,429
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in total current provision between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -21565
derivation: $15,207-$36,772
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in Total deferred provision between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -9005
derivation: 1,015-10,020
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in total provision for income taxes between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -59.37
derivation: ($25,227-$62,090)/$62,090
scale: percent
EMEA
Sales Mix
2019
2018
%Change
Hardware
$622,949
$653,499
(5%)
Software
753,729
736,509
2%
Services
149,966
140,233
7%
$1,526,644
$1,530,241
—

text: Our net sales by offering category for EMEA for 2019 and 2018, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
text: Net sales in EMEA remained flat (increased 5% excluding the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates), or down $3.6 million, in 2019 compared to 2018. Net sales of hardware declined 5%, year to year, while net sales of software and services were up 2% and 7%, respectively, year over year. The changes were the result of the following:
text: • Lower volume of net sales of networking solutions, partially offset by higher volume of net sales of devices, to large enterprise and public sector clients in hardware net sales. • Higher volume of software net sales to large enterprise and public sector clients.
text: • Higher volume of net sales of cloud solution offerings and increased software referral fees that are recorded on a net sales recognition basis. In addition, there was an increase in the volume of Insight delivered services.

Questions:
question: What was the net sales of hardware in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: $622,949
$653,499
scale: thousand
question: What was the net sales of software in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: 753,729
736,509
scale: thousand
question: What was the net sales of services in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: 149,966
140,233
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Sales Mix of Hardware between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -30550
derivation: 622,949-653,499
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Sales Mix of Software between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 17220
derivation: 753,729-736,509
scale: thousand
question: What is the average Sales Mix of Hardware for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 638224
derivation: (622,949+653,499) / 2
scale: thousand
NEO
Total FY17 PRUs Vested at end of FY18
Total FY17 PRUs Vested at end of FY19
Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested (1)
Gregory S. Clark
2,404,175
175,023
2,579,198
Nicholas R. Noviello
606,935
44,184
651,119
Amy L. Cappellanti-Wolf
207,142
15,080
222,222
Samir Kapuria
148,322
10,798
159,120
Scott C. Taylor
414,287
30,160
444,447

text: Below is the summary of the FY17 PRUs vested and earned by each NEO.
text: (1) The Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to reduce any payouts.

Questions:
question: Were any payouts reduced by the Compensation Committee?
answer: The Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to reduce any payouts
question: What does the table show?
answer: summary of the FY17 PRUs vested and earned by each NEO
question: What is the Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested for  Gregory S. Clark?
answer: 2,579,198
question: What is the difference between Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested between Gregory S. Clark and  Nicholas R. Noviello?
answer: 1928079
derivation: 2,579,198-651,119
question: What is the total Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested for all NEOs?
answer: 4056106
derivation: 2,579,198+651,119+222,222+159,120+444,447
question: What is the average Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested for all NEOs?
answer: 811221.2
derivation: (2,579,198+651,119+222,222+159,120+444,447)/5
Years Ended December 31,
Change
2019
2018
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing
$15,836
$23,425
$(7,589)
(32)%
Percent of revenues, net
32%
40%

text: Sales and Marketing
text: Sales and marketing expenses in 2019 decreased by $7.6 million, or 32%, as compared to 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the global sales support and marketing headcount, including reductions that were part of our restructuring activities during 2019 (refer to Note 4 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements), contributing to net decreases of $4.8 million in personnel-related costs, and $1.0 million in allocated facilities and information technology costs as compared to 2018. Restructuring costs in 2019 decreased $0.4 million, as there were additional restructuring activities in 2018, including a headcount reduction of approximately 13% of our workforce and the closure of certain leased facilities. The remaining decrease during 2019 was primarily the result of lower marketing costs of $0.6 million, as we eliminated or shifted the timing of certain of our marketing activities.

Questions:
question: What is the company's decrease in sales and marketing expenses between 2018 and 2019?
answer: $7.6 million
question: What is the difference in the company's 2019 personnel-related costs as compared to 2018?
answer: $4.8 million
question: What is the company's respective sales and marketing expenses in 2019 and 2018 as a percentage of its revenue?
answer: 32%
40%
question: What is the company's average sales and marketing expenses in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 19630.5
derivation: (15,836 + 23,425)/2 
scale: thousand
question: What is the value of the change between 2018 and 2019's sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of the 2018 sales and marketing expenses?
answer: 32.4
derivation: 7,589/23,425 
scale: percent
question: What is the value of the change in 2018 and 2019's sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of the 2019 sales and marketing expenses?
answer: 47.92
derivation: 7,589/15,836 
scale: percent
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Equity securities
23
19
Long-term state receivables
358
391
Deposits and other non-current assets
56
42
Total
437
452

text: Long-term state receivables include receivables related to funding and receivables related to tax refund. Funding are mainly public grants to be received from governmental agencies in Italy and France as part of longterm research and development, industrialization and capital investment projects. Long-term receivables related to tax refund correspond to tax benefits claimed by the Company in certain of its local tax jurisdictions, for which collection is expected beyond one year.
text: In 2019 and 2018, the Company entered into a factoring transaction to accelerate the realization in cash of some non-current assets. As at December 31, 2019, $131 million of the non-current assets were sold without recourse, compared to $122 million as at December 31, 2018, with a financial cost of less than $1 million for both periods.
text: Other non-current assets consisted of the following:

Questions:
question: How many non-current assets were sold without recourse as of December 31, 2019?
answer: $131 million
question: How many non-current assets were sold without recourse as of December 31, 2018?
answer: $122 million
question: What does Long-term state receivables include?
answer: Long-term state receivables include receivables related to funding and receivables related to tax refund.
question: What is the average Equity securities?
answer: 21
derivation: (23+19) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average Long-term state receivables?
answer: 374.5
derivation: (358+391) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average Deposits and other non-current assets?
answer: 49
derivation: (56+42) / 2
scale: million
Year Ended
December 31,
2019
2018
Number of
Number of
Number of
Number of
RSUs
Vested RSUs
RSUs
Vested RSUs
Outstanding, Jan. 1
951
459
462
262
Granted
333
-
759
-
Distributed
(267)
(267)
(262)
(262)
Vested
-
825
-
459
Forfeited
-
-
(8)
-
Outstanding, Dec. 31
1,017
1,017
951
459

text: Restricted Stock Unit Award Plans
text: We have two Restricted Stock Unit Award Plans for our employees and non-employee directors, a 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan (the “2017 RSU Plan”) and a 2014 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan (the “2014 RSU Plan”). Vesting of an RSU entitles the holder to receive a share of our common stock on a distribution date. Our non-employee director awards allow for non-employee directors to receive payment in cash, instead of stock, for up to 40% of each RSU award. The portion of the RSU awards subject to cash settlement are recorded as a liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as they vest and being marked-to-market each reporting period until they are distributed. The liability was $29 thousand and $11 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
text: The compensation cost to be incurred on a granted RSU without a cash settlement option is the RSU’s fair value, which is the market price of our common stock on the date of grant, less its exercise cost. The compensation cost is amortized to expense and recorded to additional paid-in capital over the vesting period of the RSU award.
text: A summary of the grants under the RSU Plans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and for the year then ended consisted of the following (in thousands):

Questions:
question: What are the two restricted stock unit award plans for employee and non-employee directors?
answer: We have two Restricted Stock Unit Award Plans for our employees and non-employee directors, a 2017 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan (the “2017 RSU Plan”) and a 2014 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan (the “2014 RSU Plan”).
question: What was the RSU liability for non-employee directors in 2019 and 2018?
answer: The liability was $29 thousand and $11 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
question: What is the ending outstanding number of vested RSUs in 2019?
answer: 1,017
scale: thousand
question: What is the difference between ending outstanding balance of RSUs and Vested RSUs in 2018?
answer: 492
derivation: 951 - 459 
scale: thousand
question: What is the difference between the number of RSUs granted in 2019 and 2018?
answer: 426
derivation: 759 - 333 
scale: thousand
question: What is the percentage increase in number of RSUs from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 6.94
derivation: (1,017 - 951) / 951 
scale: percent
For the year ended December 31,
2017
2018
2019
Revenues from fixed rate time charters
485,961
515,324
558,266
Revenues from variable rate time charters
—
—
64,334
Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited (GasLog vessels)
38,046
102,253
45,253
Revenues from vessel management services
1,222
767
784
Total
525,229
618,344
668,637

text: GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
text: 18. Revenues from Contracts with Customers
text: The Group has recognized the following amounts relating to revenues:
text: Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited relate only to the pool revenues received from GasLog’s vessels operating in the Cool Pool and do not include the Net pool allocation to GasLog of ($4,264) for the year ended December 31, 2019 ($17,818 for the year ended December 31, 2018 and $7,254 for the year ended December 31, 2017), which is recorded as a separate line item in the Profit or Loss Statement.
text: Following the exit from the Cool Pool, management allocates revenues from time charters to two categories: (a) variable rate charters and (b) fixed rate charters. The variable rate charter category contains vessels operating in the LNG carrier spot and short-term market or those which have a variable rate of hire across the charter period.

Questions:
question: What are the components of the revenues?
answer: Revenues from fixed rate time charters
Revenues from variable rate time charters
Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited (GasLog vessels)
Revenues from vessel management services
question: What are the two segments the management allocated the revenues from time charters?
answer: (a) variable rate charters and (b) fixed rate charters.
question: What does the revenues from The Cool Pool Limited represent?
answer: Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited relate only to the pool revenues received from GasLog’s vessels operating in the Cool Pool
question: In which year was the revenues from fixed rate time charters the highest?
answer: 2019
derivation: 558,266 > 515,324 > 485,961
question: What was the change in revenues from The Cool Pool Limited  from 2017 to 2018?
answer: 64207
derivation: 102,253 - 38,046 
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in total revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 8.13
derivation: (668,637 - 618,344)/618,344 
scale: percent