Case: case_443

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicant was born in 1972.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicant lives in Yerevan.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "At the material time, the applicant was a member of the \"Republic\" Party (\"Հանրապետություն\" կուսակցություն).", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "On 10 May 2002, the \"Republic\" Party applied to the Mayor of Yerevan for permission to hold a demonstration on Freedom Square in Yerevan on 14 May 2002.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "On 13 May 2002, the Mayor of Yerevan authorised the demonstration on Freedom Square as requested by the \"Republic\" Party.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The demonstration was held as planned on 14 May 2002 at around 15.00 on Freedom Square in Yerevan.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The demonstration on 14 May 2002 was jointly organised by the \"Republic\" Party and six other political parties.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The applicant participated in the demonstration on 14 May 2002 on Freedom Square in Yerevan.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "Following the demonstration, at around 16.00 on 14 May 2002, the applicant called on participants to hold a procession through Baghramyan Avenue towards the Parliament building.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "A crowd of people followed the applicant in a procession along Baghramyan Avenue towards the Parliament building on 14 May 2002.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "On 14 May 2002 at 23.10, the applicant was arrested.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "After being arrested on 14 May 2002, the applicant was brought to the Arabkir District Police Station of Yerevan (ՀՀ ոստիկանության Երևան քաղաքի Արաբկիրի բաժին).", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "Police officers prepared a record of an administrative offence (վարչական իրավախախտման արձանագրություն) stating that the applicant had \"organised an unlawful procession and violated the prescribed rules for holding demonstrations and street processions\".", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "On 15 May 2002, the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan (Երևան քաղաքի Կենտրոն և Նորք-Մարաշ համայնքների առաջին ատյանի դատարան) examined the applicant's case.", "source_paragraph": 14, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan found that the applicant, in violation of the prescribed rules for holding street processions and demonstrations, on 14 May 2002 at around 16.00, participated with a group of people in an unauthorised procession.", "source_paragraph": 14, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan found that the applicant's participation in the unauthorised procession constituted an offence envisaged by Article 180.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences (Վարչական իրավախախտումների վերաբերյալ ՀՀ օրենսգիրք).", "source_paragraph": 14, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan found it necessary, taking into consideration the circumstances of the case and the personality of the applicant, to impose an administrative penalty in the form of a fine.", "source_paragraph": 14, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan imposed a fine on the applicant in the amount of 500 Armenian drams (AMD), which was approximately EUR 1 at the material time.", "source_paragraph": 15, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The decision of the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan imposing a fine on the applicant was final and not subject to appeal.", "source_paragraph": 15, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "On 24 May 2002, the applicant lodged an appeal with the Civil Court of Appeal (ՀՀ քաղաքացիական գործերով վերաքննիչ դատարան).", "source_paragraph": 16, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "In his appeal to the Civil Court of Appeal, the applicant argued that in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia he had a right to contest the decision of the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan before a higher court.", "source_paragraph": 16, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "In his appeal to the Civil Court of Appeal, the applicant argued that the interference with his right to freedom of assembly was not prescribed by law, as there did not exist any law which prescribed the rules that the applicant had allegedly violated.", "source_paragraph": 16, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "In his appeal to the Civil Court of Appeal, the applicant expressly requested the Civil Court of Appeal to name any law prescribing the rules he had allegedly violated, if such a law existed.", "source_paragraph": 16, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "On 14 June 2002, the Civil Court of Appeal examined the applicant's appeal.", "source_paragraph": 17, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The Civil Court of Appeal found that on 14 May 2002 at around 15.00 the applicant participated in an authorised demonstration on Freedom Square in Yerevan.", "source_paragraph": 17, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The Civil Court of Appeal found that on 14 May 2002 at around 16.00 the applicant, with a group of people, participated in an unauthorised procession through Baghramyan Avenue, during which he headed the procession.", "source_paragraph": 17, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The Civil Court of Appeal found that the applicant was brought to the police station as a result of heading the unauthorised procession through Baghramyan Avenue on 14 May 2002.", "source_paragraph": 17, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The Civil Court of Appeal found that the applicant heading an unauthorised procession was characterised as an offence envisaged under Article 180.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences, and therefore the applicant must be subjected to administrative liability.", "source_paragraph": 17, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "On 24 June 2002, the applicant lodged a cassation appeal with the Court of Cassation (ՀՀ վճռաբեկ դատարան).", "source_paragraph": 18, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030"

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F006", "F008", "F009", "F010", "F015", "F016", "F017", "F018"], "interference": ["F011", "F013", "F015", "F016", "F017", "F018", "F031"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F015", "F016", "F025", "F026", "F027", "F028", "F031", "F033", "F034", "F035", "F036", "F037", "F038", "F039", "F040", "F041", "F042", "F043", "F044", "F045", "F052", "F053", "F055", "F056", "F006"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F006", "F008", "F009", "F010"], "interference": ["F016", "F018", "F031"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F016", "F028", "F031", "F033", "F041", "F043", "F044", "F045", "F055", "F056"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F009", "F010", "F016", "F018", "F031", "F028", "F041", "F044", "F045", "F055"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}