Case: case_209

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicants raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention, in addition to their complaint about the lack of impartiality of the tribunal.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}]

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F001"], "interference": ["F001"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F001"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F001"], "interference": ["F001"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F001"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F001"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "implied"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}