Case: case_219

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The Christian Democratic People's Party (CDPP) is a political party in the Republic of Moldova.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The Christian Democratic People's Party (CDPP) was represented in Parliament at the time of the events.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The Christian Democratic People's Party (CDPP) was in opposition at the time of the events.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "On 3 December 2003, the applicant party applied to the Chișinău Municipal Council for an authorisation to hold a protest demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The applicant party requested to hold the protest demonstration in the Square of the Great National Assembly, in front of the Government's building.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The applicant party requested to hold the protest demonstration on 25 January 2004.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "According to the application, the organisers intended to express views on the functioning of the democratic institutions in Moldova.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "According to the application, the organisers intended to express views on the respect for human rights.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "According to the application, the organisers intended to express views on the Moldo-Russian conflict in Transdniestria.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "On 20 January 2004, the Chișinău Municipal Council rejected the applicant party's request to hold a protest demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The Chișinău Municipal Council rejected the applicant party's request on the ground that it had convincing evidence that during the meeting there would be calls to a war of aggression, ethnic hatred and public violence.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The applicant party challenged the Chișinău Municipal Council's refusal to authorise the demonstration in court.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The applicant party argued, inter alia, that the reasons relied upon by the Chișinău Municipal Council for refusing the authorisation were entirely baseless.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "On 23 January 2004, the Chișinău Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant party's action challenging the Chișinău Municipal Council's refusal to authorise the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The Chișinău Court of Appeal found that the Chișinău Municipal Council's refusal to authorise the Christian Democratic People's Party's demonstration was justified.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The Chișinău Court of Appeal found that leaflets disseminated by the applicant party contained the slogan 'Down with Voronin's totalitarian regime'.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The Chișinău Court of Appeal found that leaflets disseminated by the applicant party contained the slogan 'Down with Putin's occupation regime'.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "According to the Chișinău Court of Appeal, the slogan 'Down with Voronin's totalitarian regime' constituted a call to a violent overthrow of the constitutional regime.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "According to the Chișinău Court of Appeal, the slogan 'Down with Putin's occupation regime' constituted a call to hatred towards the Russian people.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The Chișinău Court of Appeal recalled that during a previous demonstration organised by the applicant party, the protesters burned a picture of the President of the Russian Federation.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The Chișinău Court of Appeal recalled that during a previous demonstration organised by the applicant party, the protesters burned a Russian flag.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The previous demonstration referred to by the Chișinău Court of Appeal was organised by the applicant party to protest against the presence of the Russian military in Transdniestria.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The applicant party appealed against the Chișinău Court of Appeal's decision of 23 January 2004 dismissing its action.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The applicant party argued, inter alia, that the slogans 'Down with Voronin's totalitarian regime' and 'Down with Putin's occupation regime' could not have reasonably been interpreted as a call to a violent overthrow of the Government.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The applicant party argued, inter alia, that the slogans 'Down with Voronin's totalitarian regime' and 'Down with Putin's occupation regime' could not have reasonably been interpreted as a call to ethnic hatred.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The applicant party argued that the refusal to authorise the meeting constituted a breach of its rights guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The applicant party argued that the refusal to authorise the meeting constituted a breach of its rights guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "On 21 April 2004, the Supreme Court of Justice of Moldova dismissed the applicant party's appeal against the Chișinău Court of Appeal's decision.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "The Supreme Court of Justice of Moldova confirmed the judgment of the Chișinău Court of Appeal dated 23 January 2004.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "Section 6(1) of the Assemblies Act of 21 June 1995 provides that assemblies shall be conducted peacefully, without any sort of weapons.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW"]}, {"fact_id": "F031", "text": "Section 6(1) of the Assemblies Act of 21 June 1995 provides that assemblies shall ensure the protection of participants and the environment.",

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F004", "F006", "F010", "F016", "F017", "F020", "F021"], "interference": ["F004", "F006", "F010"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F011", "F055", "F056"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F001", "F002", "F003", "F007", "F008", "F009", "F011", "F016", "F017", "F018", "F019", "F020", "F021", "F022"], "positive_obligation": ["F011"]}, "list2": {"scope": ["F004", "F016", "F017", "F020", "F021"], "interference": ["F004", "F010"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F011", "F055"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F002", "F003", "F007", "F008", "F009", "F011", "F016", "F017", "F018", "F019", "F020", "F021", "F022"], "positive_obligation": ["F011"]}, "list3": ["F002", "F003", "F009", "F010", "F011", "F016", "F017", "F018", "F019", "F020", "F021"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": ["national_security", "prevention_of_disorder"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}}}