Case: case_571

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicant was born in 1979.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicant lives in Odessa.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicant is a vice-president of Zelyonka (Зелёнка), a non-governmental youth organisation.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The applicant is a member of the Odessa City Council.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "On 17 March 2009 the applicant, acting on behalf of Zelyonka, notified the Odessa City Mayor of the organisation's intention to hold a peaceful assembly (picket) in front of the Odessa City Council building on 19 March 2009 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "On 17 March 2009 the applicant, acting on behalf of Zelyonka, notified the Head of the Prymorsky District Police Department of Odessa of the organisation's intention to hold a peaceful assembly (picket) in front of the Odessa City Council building on 19 March 2009 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The declared purpose of the planned assembly on 19 March 2009 was to demand the completion of the construction of residential buildings contracted by the Odessa City Council's Department of Construction.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "By a letter dated 17 March 2009, the Odessa City Council informed the applicant that holding a picket with such short notice was liable to be considered unlawful.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 indicated that, pursuant to the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of 28 July 1988 on the procedure for organisation and holding of meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations in the USSR (the 1988 Decree), notification had to be given no later than ten days prior to the meeting in question.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 indicated that the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, in its decision of 19 April 2001, had held that the organisers of peaceful assemblies must inform the authorities in advance of their intention to hold a meeting.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 mentioned that no implementing law in respect of the right to peaceful assembly had yet been enacted in Ukraine.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 mentioned that the 1988 Decree (Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of 28 July 1988 on the procedure for organisation and holding of meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations in the USSR) was still in force.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 informed the applicant that untimely notification about the picket could be considered a violation of the procedure for holding meetings under paragraph 2 of the 1988 Decree (Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of 28 July 1988).", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The Odessa City Council's letter of 17 March 2009 informed the applicant that the person responsible for untimely notification could be held administratively liable under Article 185-1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The picket took place as planned between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. on 19 March 2009.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "According to the applicant, the picket on 19 March 2009 was peaceful.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "According to the applicant, only a few people took part in the picket on 19 March 2009.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The police report of 19 March 2009 noted that about 250 persons had taken part in the picket.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The police report of 19 March 2009 noted that there had been no violation of public order during the picket.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "On 4 April 2009 a police officer of the Prymorsky District Police Department of Odessa drew up an administrative offence report in the applicant's presence.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The administrative offence report of 4 April 2009 indicated that on 19 March 2009 the applicant had organised and held a picket in violation of Article 185-1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The administrative offence report of 4 April 2009 indicated that on 19 March 2009 the applicant had organised and held a picket in violation of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 19 April 2001.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The applicant signed the administrative offence report of 4 April 2009, adding a note to the effect that he considered his actions lawful.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The administrative offence report of 4 April 2009 was referred to a court.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "On 15 May 2009 the Prymorsky District Court of Odessa examined the applicant's case.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "According to the record of the hearing provided by the Government, the questioning at the Prymorsky District Court of Odessa on 15 May 2009 took place between 1.24 and 1.34 p.m.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "After the questioning on 15 May 2009, the judge of the Prymorsky District Court of Odessa retired to the deliberations chamber.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "At 2.27 p.m. on 15 May 2009 the judge of the Prymorsky District Court of Odessa publicly pronounced judgment.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "The hearing at the Prymorsky District Court of Odessa on 15 May 2009 closed at 2.32 p.m.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "According to the Government, the full text of the judgment of the P

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F005", "F015", "F016", "F019", "F034"], "interference": ["F034", "F035", "F050"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F011", "F036", "F037", "F050", "F058", "F059", "F060", "F062", "F066", "F067", "F068", "F070", "F071", "F073", "F076", "F078", "F079", "F081", "F083", "F086", "F087", "F094"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F005", "F015", "F016", "F019"], "interference": ["F034", "F035"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F058", "F060", "F062", "F066", "F068", "F070", "F071", "F073", "F076", "F078", "F094"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F015", "F034", "F035", "F058", "F060", "F062", "F068", "F070", "F071", "F073", "F076", "F078"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}