Case: case_635

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The first applicant was born in 1984.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The second applicant was born in 1979.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "Both applicants live in Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "On 14 December 2012 the State Duma adopted at first reading a draft law that prohibited adoption of children of Russian nationality by US citizens.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "On 17 December 2012 the official daily newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta announced that the second reading of the draft law was scheduled for 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "According to the applicants, they read on various online social networks that many people intended to stage solo pickets (одиночные пикеты) on 19 December 2012 in front of the State Duma to express their opposition to the draft law prohibiting adoption of children of Russian nationality by US citizens.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "According to the applicants, the format of solo pickets was chosen because there was no longer time to observe the minimum statutory three-day notification period required for other types of group public events.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The applicants decided to hold their own solo pickets on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "At around 9 a.m. on 19 December 2012 the applicants positioned themselves, holding banners, in the vicinity of the State Duma at some distance from other protesters.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The circumstances of the applicants holding solo pickets near the State Duma are also addressed in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 206-15, 7 February 2017.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "According to the applicants, they were arrested by the police several minutes after positioning themselves near the State Duma on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "According to the applicants, they were brought to a police station after their arrest on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "At 10.30 a.m. on 19 December 2012 the police drew up a record of administrative escorting (протокол административного доставления) in respect of each applicant.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "A record of administrative arrest (протокол административного задержания) drawn up at 10.30 a.m. on 19 December 2012 stated that the applicants had arrived at the police station at 10.30 a.m.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The first applicant, Mr Tsukanov, made a handwritten note on his arrest record stating that he had been actually apprehended at 9.20 a.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, made a handwritten note on his escorting record stating that he had been actually apprehended at 9.30 a.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "At the police station both applicants were accused of organising and holding a group public event without prior notification, in breach of Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The administrative offence records indicate that the offences were committed at 10 a.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The first applicant, Mr Tsukanov, made a handwritten note on his administrative offence record stating that he came to the event venue at 9 a.m. and was arrested at 9.20 a.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The first applicant, Mr Tsukanov, was released from the police station at 1.20 p.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, was released from the police station at 1.10 p.m. on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "On 15 January 2013 the justice of the peace of the 369th Court Circuit of the Tverskoy District of Moscow found the second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, guilty under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The justice of the peace of the 369th Court Circuit of the Tverskoy District of Moscow sentenced the second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, to a fine of 20,000 Russian roubles (about 495 euros at the time of the judgment on 15 January 2013).", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The justice of the peace found it established, on the basis of administrative records and testimony of police officers, that the second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, had taken part in a picket involving fifty people on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The justice of the peace found that the picket on 19 December 2012 was unlawful because no notification had been submitted by the organisers as required by the Public Events Act (PEA).", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The justice of the peace found that the second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, had waved a banner during the picket on 19 December 2012, thereby attracting the attention of passers-by and journalists assembled for the occasion.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The justice of the peace found that the second applicant, Mr Torchinskiy, had not complied with the police order to stop picketing on 19 December 2012.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "On 6 February 2013 the justice of the peace of the 369th Court Circuit of the Tverskoy District of Moscow found the first applicant, Mr Tsukanov, guilty under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "The justice of the peace of the 369th Court Circuit of the Tverskoy District of Moscow sentenced the first applicant, Mr Tsukanov, to a fine of 20,000 Russian roubles (about 495 euros at the time of the judgment on 6 February 2013).", "source_

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F008", "F009", "F024", "F025", "F030", "F022", "F028", "F004", "F006"], "interference": ["F011", "F012", "F013", "F014", "F020", "F021", "F022", "F023", "F028", "F029"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F017", "F040", "F041", "F042", "F043"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F009", "F024", "F025", "F026", "F027", "F028", "F030", "F017", "F005", "F007", "F022", "F034", "F035"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F008", "F009", "F024", "F025"], "interference": ["F011", "F013", "F020", "F021", "F022", "F028"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F017", "F042"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F005", "F007", "F009", "F025", "F030"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F005", "F007", "F009", "F025", "F022", "F028"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "implied"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": ["public_safety", "prevention_of_disorder", "rights_of_others"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}