Case: case_554

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicant was born in 1968.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicant lives in Kazan.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicant was represented by Mr I.N. Sholokhov, a lawyer practising in Kazan.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The Government were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Government before the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The Government were subsequently represented by Mr M. Galperin, successor to Mr G. Matyushkin as Representative of the Russian Government before the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "On 10 October 2007 the applicant notified the Kazan Town Hall of the intention of a group of dormitory residents to organise a static demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "On 12 October 2007 the Kazan Town Hall refused to approve the demonstration at the proposed location.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The Kazan Town Hall stated that heavy road traffic and a car park for government vehicles would put the participants' security in danger, as the reason for refusing to approve the demonstration at the proposed location.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The Kazan Town Hall proposed that the demonstration be held inside the park at Svoboda Square.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The Kazan Town Hall proposed that the demonstration be held on the other side of Svoboda Square opposite a theatre.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "On an unspecified date the applicant notified the authorities that he disagreed with the proposal to change the location of the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "Between 9 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. on 18 October 2007 a demonstration was held on the pavement close to Svoboda Square.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The demonstration on 18 October 2007 was held on the pavement close to the building of the Cabinet of Ministers opposite the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Tatarstan.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "At 3.45 p.m. on 18 October 2007 the applicant was forcibly arrested at a bus stop.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "After being forcibly arrested, the applicant was taken to the Yapeyeva police department in the Vakhitovskiy District of Kazan.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The applicant was charged with an administrative offence under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences on account of holding the demonstration in the vicinity of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Tatarstan.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The applicant was charged with an administrative offence under Article 19.3 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "On 20 October 2007 the applicant lodged a criminal complaint about the use of force by the police.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The Kazan investigative committee at the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tatarstan refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers, concluding that the use of force had been lawful and not excessive.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The Kazan investigative committee at the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tatarstan refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers in accordance with Article 24 § 1 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, citing lack of the constituent elements of a crime.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The Kazan investigative committee at the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tatarstan issued its last refusal to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers on 2 April 2008.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The Vakhitovskiy District Court upheld the refusal to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers in a judgment of 8 April 2008.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan upheld the Vakhitovskiy District Court's judgment of 8 April 2008 in a judgment of 29 April 2008, following appeals lodged by the applicant and the assistant prosecutor of Kazan.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation rejected a request by the applicant for supervisory review of the judgments of 8 April 2008 and 29 April 2008 in a decision of 18 August 2008.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "On 12 November 2007 the Justice of the Peace of the 4th Court Circuit of the Vakhitovskiy District of Kazan convicted the applicant of breaching the established procedure for conducting public assemblies under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The conviction under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences was on the grounds that the applicant had held the demonstration opposite the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, which was prohibited by law.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The applicant was sentenced to a fine of 1,000 roubles (RUB) for the offence under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "On 16 November 2007 the Justice of the Peace of the 5th Court Circuit of the Vakhitovskiy District of Kazan convicted the applicant of disobeying a lawful order of the police under Article 19.3 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "The applicant was sentenced to a fine of RUB 800 for the offence under Article 19.3 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F031", "text": "The applicant appealed against the judgments of 12 and 16 November 2007.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F032", "text": "On 23 November 2007 the Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan upheld the judgment of 12 November 2007.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F033", "text": "On 30 November 2007 the Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan upheld the judgment of 16 November 2007.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F034", "text": "On 11 January 2008 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan granted the applicant's request for supervisory review of the judgments in the proceedings which had ended with his conviction under Article 19.3 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F035", "text": "The Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan held that the record of the applicant's administrative

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F007", "F008", "F010", "F011", "F012", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F026"], "interference": ["F008", "F010", "F011", "F015", "F026", "F027", "F028", "F032"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F026", "F027", "F055"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F026", "F027", "F032", "F055"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F007", "F012", "F013", "F014"], "interference": ["F008", "F015", "F026"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F027", "F055"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F026", "F027", "F055"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F007", "F008", "F014", "F026", "F027", "F055"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}