Case: case_508

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The present case concerns alleged restrictions imposed by the authorities on the exercise of the applicants' freedom of peaceful assembly.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The present case concerns the alleged lack of domestic remedies in regard to restrictions on the applicants' freedom of peaceful assembly.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicants' names and other relevant details of the applications are set out in the Appendix to the judgment.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The Government were initially represented by Mr M. Galperin, former Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The Government were later represented by Mr M. Vinogradov, successor to Mr M. Galperin as Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "On 5 October 2018 the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 notified the prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow of his intention to hold a picket (пикетирование) on 11 October 2018.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The picket notified by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 was planned to run from 12 noon to 3 p.m. on 11 October 2018.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The picket notified by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 was to take place in front of the State Duma (lower chamber of the Russian Parliament) building in central Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "Twenty people were expected to attend the picket notified by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The aim of the picket notified by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 was to protest against the increase in the State pension age recently voted by the State Duma.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "On 5 October 2018 a deputy prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow refused to approve the location chosen by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 for the picket.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The deputy prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow indicated that the venue chosen by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 was unsuitable for public events because it would be impossible to meet safety requirements there.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The deputy prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow indicated that holding a picket at the chosen venue might result in disruption to the functioning of public utilities, transport, social or communications services.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The deputy prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow indicated that holding a picket at the chosen venue might result in obstruction of pedestrian traffic or a breach of the rights and interests of citizens not participating in the notified event.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The deputy prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow proposed that the picket be held in Moscow's Lermontov Park, some 3 km from the State Duma building.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The applicant in Application No. 29356/19 challenged the deputy prefect's decision refusing to approve the location of the picket before the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The applicant in Application No. 29356/19 submitted before the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow that the aim of the public event was to make the State Duma deputies aware of the inadmissibility of raising the State pension age.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The applicant in Application No. 29356/19 submitted before the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow that it was crucial to hold the event in front of the State Duma building, as the deputies were there daily.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The applicant in Application No. 29356/19 submitted before the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow that the pedestrian pavement in front of the State Duma building was large enough to allow the picket to take place without obstructing pedestrian traffic or access to the State Duma.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "On 10 October 2018 the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicant's complaint in Application No. 29356/19.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that pedestrian and vehicle traffic at Okhotnyy Ryad Street in Moscow, the location chosen by the applicant in Application No. 29356/19, is heavy.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that the deputy prefect's finding that the location at Okhotnyy Ryad Street in Moscow was unsuitable for public events was justified, as holding public events there might endanger the safety of participants and non-participants.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that the deputy prefect's decision met the requirements of section 8 of the Public Events Act.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 had been given a written decision within the established time-limit indicating the reasons why it was impossible to hold the public event at the chosen location and time.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that the applicant in Application No. 29356/19 had not been deprived of an opportunity to enjoy his constitutional right to hold a public event by choosing another location, including the location proposed by the deputy prefect.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The Taganskiy District Court of Moscow held that the participants' right to express opinions during public events and voice demands on issues related to political, economic, social or cultural life had not been restricted.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. APPLICATION NO. 29356/19"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The applicant in Application No. 29356/19 appealed against the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow's judgment of 10 October 2018.", "source_par

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F007", "F009", "F010", "F011", "F012", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F041", "F043", "F044", "F045", "F046", "F048", "F051"], "interference": ["F012", "F016", "F047", "F048"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F095", "F098", "F099", "F100", "F104", "F105", "F113", "F114", "F117", "F118", "F119", "F122", "F123", "F152", "F153", "F156"], "legitimate_aim": ["F012", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F023"], "necessity": ["F009", "F010", "F011", "F012", "F013", "F016", "F018", "F019", "F021", "F022", "F023", "F024", "F025", "F030", "F031", "F034", "F044", "F045", "F047", "F048", "F050", "F051", "F053", "F054", "F061", "F062", "F063", "F064", "F066", "F067", "F071", "F076", "F077", "F078", "F080", "F119", "F122"], "positive_obligation": ["F016", "F034", "F053", "F054"]}, "list2": {"scope": ["F007", "F009", "F011", "F041", "F044", "F045", "F046"], "interference": ["F012", "F047", "F048"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F113", "F119", "F152", "F156"], "legitimate_aim": ["F013", "F014", "F015", "F023"], "necessity": ["F010", "F012", "F013", "F016", "F019", "F022", "F034", "F044", "F045", "F048", "F051", "F053", "F054", "F066", "F078", "F080"], "positive_obligation": ["F016", "F034", "F053", "F054"]}, "list3": ["F009", "F011", "F013", "F016", "F022", "F034", "F044", "F045", "F048", "F051", "F053", "F054", "F080"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "implied"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit", "aims": ["public_safety", "rights_of_others"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}}}