Case: case_642

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The United Civil Aviation Trade Union is a trade union registered in Budapest.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "Mr A. Csorba is a Hungarian national.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "Mr A. Csorba was born in 1970.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "Mr A. Csorba lives in Vecsés.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "Mr A. Csorba is the President of the United Civil Aviation Trade Union.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "On 12 October 2012, Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) applied to the Budapest police department for authorisation to hold a demonstration on the road leading to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) stated that the demonstration would be held on the hard shoulder of the road leading to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport, which was not ordinarily used for traffic.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "One of the declared objectives of the demonstration was to draw the public's attention to the precarious financial situation in which the employees of Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport would find themselves if salary cuts envisaged by the company managing the airport were carried out.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The demonstration was scheduled to be held between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. on 17 October 2012.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) specified that it was expected that about fifty to 100 persons would participate in the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) specified that it was intended that speeches would be given at the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) specified that it was intended that an open letter would be read out at the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "On 14 October 2012, the Budapest police department registered the application to hold a demonstration on the road leading to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "On 14 October 2012, the Budapest police department informed Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) that it was necessary to schedule a meeting with the organisers in order to clarify details regarding the programme of the demonstration and the number of police officers that would be required to secure the event.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) and the Vice-President of the United Civil Aviation Trade Union met with the representatives of the Monor police department on 14 October 2012.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The representative of the Monor police department suggested that the demonstration be held at another location, since the planned venue on the road leading to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport would endanger traffic.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) assured the police that the demonstrators would respect traffic rules.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) assured the police that the demonstrators would only occupy the part of the road not used for traffic.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) assured the police that the demonstrators would distribute flyers to car passengers.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) assured the police that the organisers would call off or halt the demonstration if it was not in compliance with the relevant legal provisions.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "On 14 October 2012, the Monor police department forbade the demonstration planned for 17 October 2012 on the road leading to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The Monor police department was of the view that the planned demonstration would endanger traffic.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The Monor police department was of the view that the planned demonstration would render Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport inaccessible, infringing passengers' right to leave the country.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The Monor police department was of the view that the demonstration would breach the traffic code, since those parts of the road not used for traffic were not supposed to be accessed by pedestrians or be used for parking.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "On 17 October 2012, the United Civil Aviation Trade Union (the first applicant) and Mr A. Csorba (the second applicant) requested judicial review of the Monor police department's decision forbidding the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The applicants relied on their right to freedom of expression in requesting judicial review of the Monor police department's decision forbidding the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The applicants relied on their right to freedom of assembly in requesting judicial review of the Monor police department's decision forbidding the demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The applicants argued that a demonstration could only be forbidden on the grounds of a need to ensure traffic safety if there were no alternative means of access to Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "The applicants argued that the demonstration would not constitute any greater hindrance to traffic than would roadworks.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "By a decision of 19 October 2012, the Budapest Surroundings High Court (Budapest Környéki Törvényszék) dismissed the applicants' complaint requesting judicial review of the Monor poli

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F001", "F005", "F006", "F007", "F009", "F010", "F011", "F012", "F017", "F018", "F020"], "interference": ["F021", "F030"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F032", "F021"], "legitimate_aim": ["F022", "F023", "F032"], "necessity": ["F007", "F008", "F009", "F010", "F016", "F017", "F018", "F020", "F021", "F022", "F023", "F030", "F031"], "positive_obligation": ["F006", "F008", "F016", "F021", "F030", "F031"]}, "list2": {"scope": ["F006", "F007", "F009", "F010", "F017", "F020"], "interference": ["F021"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F032", "F021"], "legitimate_aim": ["F022", "F023"], "necessity": ["F007", "F008", "F009", "F010", "F016", "F020", "F021", "F031"], "positive_obligation": ["F008", "F016", "F021"]}, "list3": ["F006", "F007", "F008", "F009", "F010", "F016", "F020", "F021", "F031"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit", "aims": ["prevention_of_disorder", "rights_of_others"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}}}