Case: case_614

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicants attempted to participate in a public event in support of LGBTI people.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The public event in support of LGBTI people was authorised to take place on 12 October 2013 in St Petersburg.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The facts related to the public event on 12 October 2013 in St Petersburg were examined by the Court in Berkman v. Russia (no. 46712/15, 1 December 2020).", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The public event on 12 October 2013 in St Petersburg was disrupted by violent counter-demonstrators.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The police present at the public event on 12 October 2013 arrested a group of participants in the event.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The applicants were among the group of participants arrested by the police at the public event on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The applicants were transferred to a police station following their arrest at the public event on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The applicants were charged with disorderly misconduct (use of foul language), an offence under Article 20.1 of the Federal Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "On 21 November 2013, the court terminated the administrative proceedings against the second applicant for the lack of elements of an administrative offence in her acts.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "On 18 December 2013, the court terminated the administrative proceedings against the first applicant for the lack of elements of an administrative offence in her acts.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "On 24 February 2014, the first applicant lodged a civil claim against police and other authorities with the Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The first applicant's civil claim challenged the lawfulness of her arrest and detention at the police station.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The first applicant's civil claim alleged that her arrest and detention infringed, among others, her right to freedom of assembly.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The first applicant's civil claim alleged that her arrest and detention infringed, among others, her right not to be discriminated against.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "On 24 April 2014, the Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg dismissed the first applicant's civil claim.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg considered that the first applicant's arrest and transfer to the police station had been lawful because she had refused to show her ID documents to the police.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "On 6 October 2014, the St Petersburg City Court upheld the Primorskiy District Court's judgment of 24 April 2014 on appeal.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The St Petersburg City Court stressed that there had been tension between the participants of the gathering and counter-demonstrators during the event on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The St Petersburg City Court stressed that there had been a breach of public order during the event on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The St Petersburg City Court held that the first applicant's arrest and transfer to the police station had been justified for the purposes of facilitating subsequent administrative proceedings.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The St Petersburg City Court held that the fact that the administrative proceedings against the first applicant had later been terminated had not invalidated the lawfulness of the first applicant's arrest.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "On 6 February 2015, the St Petersburg City Court dismissed the first applicant's cassation appeal against the Primorskiy District Court judgment of 24 April 2014 and the St Petersburg City Court appeal decision of 6 October 2014.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "On an unspecified date in 2014, the second applicant brought civil proceedings against the State.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The second applicant claimed that her arrest at the venue of the gathering on 12 October 2013 had been unlawful.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The second applicant claimed that her transfer to the police station following her arrest had been unlawful.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The second applicant claimed that the police had failed to ensure public order during the gathering on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "The second applicant claimed that the police had failed to ensure the safety of participants in the gathering on 12 October 2013.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The second applicant claimed non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 225,000 Russian roubles (approximately 3,100 euros at the time).", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "On 16 December 2014, the Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg partly granted the second applicant's civil claim.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "The Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg found that the second applicant's arrest and transfer to the police station had been unlawful.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F031", "text": "The Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg awarded the second applicant 2,000 Russian roubles (about 28 euros at the time) in compensation.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F032", "text": "The Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg dismissed the remainder of the second applicant's claims concerning police inaction for the lack of evidence.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F033", "text": "The second applicant's subsequent appeals against the Petrogradskiy District Court judgment of 16 December 2014 were dismissed.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F034", "text": "The final decision dismissing the second applicant's appeals against the Petrogradskiy District Court judgment of 16 December 2014 was delivered by the Supreme Court of Russia on 22

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F001", "F002", "F004", "F005", "F006"], "interference": ["F005", "F006", "F007", "F008", "F039"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F005", "F006", "F007", "F008", "F009", "F010", "F016", "F020", "F021", "F039", "F042"], "positive_obligation": ["F004", "F005", "F026", "F027", "F038", "F040", "F042"]}, "list2": {"scope": ["F001", "F002", "F004"], "interference": ["F005", "F006", "F007"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F009", "F010", "F042"], "positive_obligation": ["F004", "F005", "F042"]}, "list3": ["F001", "F002", "F004", "F005", "F006", "F009", "F010", "F042"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "implied"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}}}