Case: case_153

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The present case concerns the allegedly unjustified interference with the applicants' right to freedom of assembly on account of the dispersal of an unauthorised peaceful protest.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicants alleged, relying on Article 6 of the Convention, that their rights were breached by the domestic authorities.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicants alleged, relying on Article 10 of the Convention, that their rights were breached by the domestic authorities.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The applicants alleged, relying on Article 11 of the Convention, that their rights were breached by the domestic authorities.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "On 4 and 5 March 2012, the mass media broadcast information to the effect that two persons arrested on allegedly political grounds had been subjected to ill-treatment while in custody.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The applicants, together with a number of other persons, gathered at around 3 p.m. on 6 March 2012 near the metro station Elmlar Akademiyasi in Baku to protest against the alleged ill-treatment of two persons arrested on allegedly political grounds.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The applicants and other protesters attempted to march towards the Ministry of Internal Affairs on 6 March 2012.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The protest on 6 March 2012 near the metro station Elmlar Akademiyasi in Baku was spontaneous and peaceful.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The attempt by the applicants and other protesters to stage a march towards the Ministry of Internal Affairs was stopped by police officers, who began to disperse the protesters.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The police arrested seventeen protesters, including the applicants, on 6 March 2012.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The seventeen arrested protesters, including the applicants, were taken to the Yasamal District Police Office.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "At the Yasamal District Police Office, administrative-offence reports (inzibati xəta haqqında protokol) were drawn up in respect of the arrested protesters, including the applicants.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "On 6 March 2012, the first applicant was brought before the Yasamal District Court.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The Yasamal District Court convicted the first applicant under Article 296 (minor hooliganism) of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The Yasamal District Court sentenced the first applicant to a fine in the amount of 50 Azerbaijani manats (AZN), approximately 40 euros (EUR) at the material time.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The administrative-offence reports in respect of the second applicant stated that the second applicant had committed an administrative offence under Article 298 (violation of the rules on holding public gatherings) of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The administrative-offence reports in respect of the third applicant stated that the third applicant had committed an administrative offence under Article 298 (violation of the rules on holding public gatherings) of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The police ordered the second applicant to pay a fine in the amount of 10 Azerbaijani manats (AZN), approximately 8 euros (EUR) at the material time.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The police ordered the third applicant to pay a fine in the amount of 10 Azerbaijani manats (AZN), approximately 8 euros (EUR) at the material time.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The second applicant was released after payment of the fine of 10 Azerbaijani manats (AZN).", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The third applicant was released after payment of the fine of 10 Azerbaijani manats (AZN).", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "On 19 March 2012, the applicants lodged a complaint with the Baku Administrative Economic Court against the Yasamal District Police Office.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "In their complaint to the Baku Administrative Economic Court, the applicants argued that the protest in which they had participated had been peaceful.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "In their complaint to the Baku Administrative Economic Court, the applicants argued that the police officers' interference with the protest had been unlawful and inadequate.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "On 27 July 2012, the Baku Administrative Economic Court dismissed the applicants' complaints as unsubstantiated.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "On 28 September 2012, the applicants lodged an appeal with the Baku Court of Appeal, reiterating their previous complaints against the Yasamal District Police Office.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "On 13 November 2012, the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the applicants' appeal.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "On 13 November 2012, the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the Baku Administrative Economic Court's judgment of 27 July 2012, finding it justified.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "On 24 December 2012, the third applicant lodged a cassation appeal complaining that the dispersal of the protest had violated his right to freedom of assembly.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "On 24 December 2012, the third applicant lodged a cassation appeal complaining that the dispersal of the protest had violated his right to freedom of expression.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F031", "text": "On 24 December 2012, the third applicant lodged a cassation appeal complaining that the hearing before the Baku Court of Appeal had not been fair.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F032", "text": "By a decision of 13 March 2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the third applicant's cassation appeal.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F033", "text": "By a decision of 13 March 2013, the Supreme Court upheld the Baku Court of Appeal's judgment of 13 November 2012, finding it justified.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["SU

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F006", "F008", "F010", "F017", "F019"], "interference": ["F006", "F009", "F010", "F017", "F019", "F021"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F005", "F006", "F008", "F017", "F019", "F025", "F027", "F028", "F032", "F033"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F006", "F008"], "interference": ["F006", "F009", "F017", "F019"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F005", "F006", "F008", "F017", "F025", "F032"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F005", "F006", "F008", "F009", "F017", "F019", "F032"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": ["prevention_of_disorder", "rights_of_others"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}