Case: case_237

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The present applications concern the applicants' arrests in relation to their intention to participate in peaceful demonstrations.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The present applications concern administrative proceedings against the applicants in relation to their intention to participate in peaceful demonstrations.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The applicants alleged that their arrest had been an unlawful interference with their right to freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The applicants alleged that their conviction had been an unlawful interference with their right to freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The applicants alleged that their arrest had been contrary to the guarantees of Article 5 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The applicants alleged that their arrest had been contrary to the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The applicants alleged that their conviction had been contrary to the guarantees of Article 5 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The applicants alleged that their conviction had been contrary to the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "Some applicants raised complaints under Article 10 of the Convention.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The applicants were represented by Mr R. Mustafazade, a lawyer based in Azerbaijan.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The applicants were represented by Mr A. Mustafayev, a lawyer based in Azerbaijan.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Əsgərov.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The circumstances relating to the applicants' arrest and custody are similar to those in Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan (application nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, paragraphs 5-55, judgment of 11 February 2016).", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The circumstances relating to the subsequent administrative proceedings against the applicants are similar to those in Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan (application nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, paragraphs 5-55, judgment of 11 February 2016).", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The circumstances relating to the applicants' arrest and custody are similar to those in Huseynov and Others v. Azerbaijan (application nos. 34262/14 and 5 others, paragraphs 4-30, judgment of 24 November 2016).", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The circumstances relating to the subsequent administrative proceedings against the applicants are similar to those in Huseynov and Others v. Azerbaijan (application nos. 34262/14 and 5 others, paragraphs 4-30, judgment of 24 November 2016).", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The applicants were opposition-oriented activists.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The applicants intended to participate in peaceful demonstrations planned for 8 April 2012.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The applicants intended to participate in peaceful demonstrations planned for 22 April 2012.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The applicants were arrested on various dates while distributing leaflets inviting people to participate in the authorised demonstration of 8 April 2012.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The applicants were arrested on various dates while distributing leaflets inviting people to participate in the authorised demonstration of 22 April 2012.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The applicants were subsequently convicted under the Code of Administrative Offences to various administrative detention terms.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "Further information concerning the applications is set out in the appended table.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}]

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F001", "F002", "F018", "F019", "F020", "F021"], "interference": ["F001", "F002", "F003", "F004", "F020", "F021", "F022"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F013", "F014", "F015", "F016", "F020", "F021", "F022"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F018", "F019", "F020", "F021"], "interference": ["F020", "F021", "F022"], "prescribed_by_law": [], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F013", "F014", "F015", "F016", "F020", "F021", "F022"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F018", "F019", "F020", "F021", "F022", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F016"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "implied"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}