Case: case_473

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicant was born in 1986.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicant lives in Mozhaysk, Moscow Region.", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "On 31 January 2009, the applicant and six other people decided to hold a flash mob in front of the Office of the Russian Government in Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The applicant and six other people arrived at the Office of the Russian Government in Moscow at around 1 p.m. on 31 January 2009.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The applicant and six other people positioned themselves at Gorbatyy Bridge on 31 January 2009.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "Each participant in the flash mob held a blank sheet of paper.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "Each participant in the flash mob had their mouth covered with adhesive tape.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "At 1.20 p.m. on 31 January 2009, the police ordered the group at Gorbatyy Bridge to disperse.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "The applicant asked to be informed of the grounds for the police order to disperse.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The applicant was taken to Presnenskiy police station.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The applicant was charged under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences (breaches of the established procedure for the organisation or conduct of public gatherings, meetings, demonstrations, marches or pickets).", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The charge against the applicant under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences related to his participation in a public gathering.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "The basis for the charge against the applicant was that the requirement of prior notification under the Federal Law on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, no. FZ-54 of 19 June 2004 (the Public Events Act), had not been respected.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "On 11 March 2009, the justice of the peace of the 378th circuit of the Presnenskiy District of Moscow convicted the applicant of the administrative offence under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The justice of the peace of the 378th circuit of the Presnenskiy District of Moscow sentenced the applicant to a fine of 1,000 Russian roubles (approximately 22 euros).", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "The judgment of 11 March 2009 stated that at 1.20 p.m. on 31 January 2009, the applicant, as a participant in the public event in the form of a static demonstration (пикетирование), breached the established procedure for the conduct of a public event.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "The applicant denied his guilt in respect of the administrative offence charged under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "The applicant stated that he had been aware of the need to comply with the notification procedure when organising a public event.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The applicant stated that in this particular case compliance with the notification procedure had not been necessary because the act had not been political in character but had been a flash mob, that is to say a synchronised action of several people.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "The applicant told the police officers that the participants in the act had not been involved in a public event but had been taking photos on Gorbatyy Bridge while holding blank sheets of paper.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "The justice of the peace of the 378th circuit of the Presnenskiy District of Moscow declined the applicant's arguments because his guilt in the administrative offence had been proved by the bulk of evidence examined in the course of the court hearing.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "The judgment of 11 March 2009 found that the applicant voluntarily and directly participated in the public event in the form of a static demonstration that had been taking place in breach of the procedure set out by the Public Events Act (Federal Law no. FZ-54 of 19 June 2004).", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "The judgment of 11 March 2009 found that the applicant failed to comply with the lawful order by the police officers to stop the static demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The justice of the peace of the 378th circuit of the Presnenskiy District of Moscow dismissed the applicant's argument that the act did not amount to a public event in the form of a static demonstration and that he did not participate in a public event, because the evidence collected in the case showed otherwise.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The applicant appealed against the judgment of 11 March 2009, challenging the applicability of the Public Events Act (Federal Law no. FZ-54 of 19 June 2004) to the circumstances of the case.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The applicant appealed against the judgment of 11 March 2009, contesting the fine imposed on him.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "On 28 April 2009, the Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow upheld the judgment of 11 March 2009.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicant's and his lawyer's arguments presented in the statement of appeal.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "The Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow found that the applicant appeared at around 2 p.m. on 31 January 2009 among a group of comrades with whom he had agreed to do so on the Internet, on the bridge in front of the building at 2 Krasnopresnenskaya Embankment in Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "The Pres

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F003", "F004", "F005", "F006", "F007", "F017", "F019", "F032"], "interference": ["F003", "F008", "F010", "F011", "F013", "F014", "F015"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F039", "F040", "F043", "F044", "F045", "F048", "F049", "F050", "F051", "F052", "F053", "F054", "F055", "F056", "F057"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F003", "F005", "F006", "F007", "F008", "F011", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F021", "F022", "F027", "F032", "F033"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F003", "F005", "F006", "F007", "F032"], "interference": ["F008", "F013", "F014", "F015"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F043", "F044", "F045", "F048", "F049"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F003", "F006", "F007", "F013", "F014", "F022", "F027", "F033"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F003", "F006", "F007", "F008", "F013", "F014", "F015", "F022", "F027"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "implied"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": ["prevention_of_disorder"]}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}