Case: case_606

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The applicant was born in 1943.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The applicant lived in Budapest.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "On 24 November 2006, the applicant announced to the Budapest Police Department his intention to organise a demonstration on 9 December 2006 on Kossuth Square in Budapest, in front of Parliament.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The announcement of 24 November 2006 was made as required by the Assembly Act 1989.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "On 26 November 2006, the Budapest Police Department refused to deal with the applicant's application to organise a demonstration on Kossuth Square.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "On 23 October 2006, the Budapest Police Department declared the area of Kossuth Square a 'security operational zone' (biztonsági műveleti terület) for an indefinite period of time.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The Budapest Police Department declared Kossuth Square a 'security operational zone' in view of the tumultuous events in Budapest in September 2006.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The Budapest Police Department observed that the designation of Kossuth Square as a 'security operational zone' placed it outside the Budapest Police Department's jurisdiction as regards the prohibition of, or acquiescence in, a demonstration.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "On 6 December 2006, the Budapest Regional Court dismissed the applicant's request for judicial review of the Budapest Police Department's refusal to deal with the application.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The Budapest Regional Court, in dismissing the applicant's request for judicial review on 6 December 2006, observed that no decision on the merits of the case had ever been adopted by the administrative authorities, which excluded such a review.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "On 11 December 2006, the Deputy Head of the National Police Department dismissed the applicant's further complaint.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "On 19 December 2006, the applicant filed an action with the Budapest Regional Court challenging the decision of 23 October 2006 declaring Kossuth Square a 'security operational zone'.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "On 19 December 2006, the applicant filed an action with the Budapest Regional Court challenging the decision of 11 December 2006 by the Deputy Head of the National Police Department.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "On 11 January 2007, the Head of Budapest Police dismissed the applicant's renewed complaint.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "On 12 February 2007, the Deputy Head of the National Police Department partly reversed the Head of Budapest Police's decision of 11 January 2007.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "On 12 February 2007, the Deputy Head of the National Police Department instructed the Budapest Police Department to substitute the indefinite 'security operational zone' measure with one of definite duration.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "On 5 March 2007, the Budapest Regional Court dismissed the applicant's action arising from the decisions of 11 January 2007 and 12 February 2007.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "In dismissing the applicant's action on 5 March 2007, the Budapest Regional Court essentially endorsed the police authorities' earlier reasoning.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "The Budapest Regional Court pointed out on 5 March 2007 that the proceedings only concerned the police's decision on non-competence and did not constitute a review of the police's original decision declaring Kossuth Square a 'security operational zone'.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "Upon a further complaint by the applicant, on 18 March 2008 the Budapest Regional Court quashed the decisions of 11 January 2007 and 12 February 2007.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "On 18 March 2008, the Budapest Regional Court remitted the case to the National Police Department.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "In reaction to the applicant's petition for review, on 29 April 2009 the Supreme Court quashed the Budapest Regional Court's decision of 18 March 2008.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "On 29 April 2009, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the Budapest Regional Court.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The Budapest Regional Court's procedure was interrupted on 1 October 2009 on account of the applicant's death.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "The applicant's son and heir joined the proceedings before the Budapest Regional Court as successor on 25 August 2011.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The Government submitted that the subject matter of the litigation pending before the Budapest Regional Court was the police's original decision declaring Kossuth Square a 'security operational zone'.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE", "A. Proceedings initiated by the applicant"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "In a case

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F003", "F004"], "interference": ["F005", "F006", "F008"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F006", "F027", "F038", "F040", "F042", "F043"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F003"], "interference": ["F005", "F006", "F008"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F006", "F038", "F040", "F043"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": [], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F003", "F006", "F038", "F040", "F043"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}