Case: case_372

Atomic Facts:
[{"fact_id": "F001", "text": "The case concerns the alleged lack of public access to a reasoned judgment in a civil case.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F002", "text": "The case concerns the applicant's arrest and administrative offence proceedings for participating in an unlawful public assembly.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F003", "text": "The case concerns the applicant's dismissal from the police for criticising her superiors.", "source_paragraph": 1, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F004", "text": "The applicant was born in 1967.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F005", "text": "The applicant lives in Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F006", "text": "The applicant had been granted legal aid.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F007", "text": "The applicant was represented by Ms V. Petrova, a lawyer practising in Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 2, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F008", "text": "The Government were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F009", "text": "Mr G. Matyushkin was succeeded in the office of Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights by Mr M. Galperin.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F010", "text": "The Government were subsequently represented by Mr M. Galperin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights.", "source_paragraph": 3, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F011", "text": "The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.", "source_paragraph": 4, "section_path": ["THE FACTS"]}, {"fact_id": "F012", "text": "The applicant was a police officer in the Administrative Department of the Special Police Force (ОМОН).", "source_paragraph": 5, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F013", "text": "On 25 February 2009 the applicant held a solo demonstration in front of the Government of Russia building.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F014", "text": "The applicant's solo demonstration of 25 February 2009 was covered by the press.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F015", "text": "The applicant alleged that the in-house police medical practitioner had damaged her daughter's health on purpose.", "source_paragraph": 6, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F016", "text": "On 13 March 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the police for a serious breach of disciplinary rules.", "source_paragraph": 7, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F017", "text": "On 24 March 2009 the applicant challenged her dismissal before the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow.", "source_paragraph": 8, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F018", "text": "On 10 April 2009 the Tverskoy District Court found it established that by holding the solo demonstration the applicant had committed a serious breach of disciplinary rules.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F019", "text": "On 10 April 2009 the Tverskoy District Court found that there had been statutory grounds for the applicant's dismissal.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F020", "text": "On 10 April 2009 the Tverskoy District Court found that the applicant's dismissal had been lawful.", "source_paragraph": 9, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F021", "text": "On 30 June 2010 the Moscow City Court upheld the Tverskoy District Court judgment of 10 April 2009 on appeal.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F022", "text": "On 30 June 2010 the Moscow City Court found that the Tverskoy District Court judgment of 10 April 2009 had been lawful, sufficiently reasoned and justified.", "source_paragraph": 10, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "I. SOLO DEMONSTRATION OF 25 FEBRUARY 2009 AND THE APPLICANT'S DISMISSAL FROM POLICE SERVICE"]}, {"fact_id": "F023", "text": "On 20 September 2010 the applicant notified the Prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow of her intention to hold a picket from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. on 23 September 2010.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F024", "text": "The intended picket on 23 September 2010 was to be held in front of the Prosecutor General's office on Bolshaya Dmitrovka Street.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F025", "text": "Ten people were expected to attend the intended picket on 23 September 2010.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F026", "text": "The aim of the intended picket on 23 September 2010 was to draw the Prosecutor General's attention to corruption of prosecutors and to the absence of any effective remedy in that respect.", "source_paragraph": 11, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F027", "text": "On 20 September 2010 the Prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow refused to approve the public event planned for 23 September 2010.", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F028", "text": "The Prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow refused to approve the public event on the ground that the notification had been submitted outside the time-limit established by the Public Events Act (no. FZ-54 of 19 June 2004).", "source_paragraph": 12, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F029", "text": "At about 10.20 a.m. on 23 September 2010 four people started to picket on Bolshaya Dmitrovka Street in front of the Prosecutor General's office.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F030", "text": "As it was raining on 23 September 2010, the participants to the picket took shelter in the archway of one of the neighbouring buildings.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F031", "text": "The participants to the picket on 23 September 2010 displayed placards protesting against corruption of prosecutors.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F032", "text": "At about 11 a.m. on 23 September 2010 the participants to the picket were arrested by the police and brought to a police station.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "F033", "text": "The applicant was released at 2 p.m. on 23 September 2010.", "source_paragraph": 13, "section_path": ["THE FACTS", "II. PUBLIC EVENT OF 23 SEPTEMBER 2010"]}, {"fact_id": "

Fact Mapping:
{"list1": {"scope": ["F029", "F030", "F031", "F032", "F034", "F035", "F040", "F044"], "interference": ["F027", "F028", "F032", "F033", "F034", "F035", "F036"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F023", "F027", "F028", "F038", "F039", "F041", "F042", "F043", "F055", "F056", "F058"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F027", "F029", "F030", "F031", "F032", "F033", "F034", "F035", "F036", "F040", "F044"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list2": {"scope": ["F029", "F031", "F032"], "interference": ["F027", "F032", "F034", "F036"], "prescribed_by_law": ["F023", "F041", "F042", "F055"], "legitimate_aim": [], "necessity": ["F029", "F030", "F031", "F032", "F034", "F035", "F044"], "positive_obligation": []}, "list3": ["F029", "F030", "F031", "F032", "F035", "F041", "F044"]}

Conclusion:
{"violated": true, "elements": {"scope": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_assembly_exists": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_participation": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "scope_peaceful": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "interference": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "explicit"}, "prescribed_by_law_foreseeable": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law_accessible": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "prescribed_by_law_safeguards": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implied"}, "legitimate_aim": {"conclusion": "yes", "discussed": "implicit", "aims": []}, "necessity": {"conclusion": "no", "discussed": "explicit"}, "positive_obligation": {"conclusion": null, "discussed": "not_discussed"}}}