សេចក្ដីសង្គ្រោះ

សេចក្ដីសង្គ្រោះ (អង់គ្លេស: Salvation) ជាការសង្គ្រោះព្រលឹងវិញ្ញាណឲ្យរួចពីបាប និងសេចក្ដីស្លាប់។ សេចក្ដីសង្គ្រោះក៏ត្រូវបានហៅថាជាការរំដោះ ឬការរួចចាកផុត ពីនិស្ស័យបាប និងជាសេចក្ដីសន្យានៃជីវិតអស់កល្បជានិច្ច តាមរយៈព្រះវិញ្ញាណ។ "The saving of the soul; the deliverance from sin and its consequences" OED 2nd ed. 1989. 

យោងតាមជំនឿរបស់គ្រីស្ទាន សេចក្ដីសង្គ្រោះពីបាបទូទៅ និងបាបដែលយើងមានតាំងពីកំណើតមក ត្រូវបានធ្វើឲ្យកើតឡើងដោយជីវិត ការសុគត និងដោយការមានព្រះជន្មរស់ឡើងវិញរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ ដែលនៅក្នុងបរិបទនៃសេចក្ដីសង្គ្រោះគឺសំដៅលើយញ្ញបូជាលោះបាប។"Christian Doctrines of Salvation." Religion facts. June 20, 2009. http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/beliefs/salvation.htmNewman, Jay. Foundations of religious tolerance. University of Toronto Press, 1982.Parry, Robin A. Universal salvation? The Current Debate. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004. ទោះបីជាមានគ្រីស្ទានខុសគ្នាជាច្រើនយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ក៏គ្រីស្ទានមួយចំនួនធំមានការយល់ឃើញស្របគ្នាថា សេចក្ដីសង្រ្គោះអាចកើតឡើងតាមរយៈកិច្ចការរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទព្រះបុត្រារបស់ព្រះ គឹដោយការដែលព្រះអង្គសុគតនៅលើឈើឆ្កាង។A. J. Wallace and R. D. Rusk, Moral Transformation: The Original Christian Paradigm of Salvation (New Zealand: Bridgehead, 2011), pp. 249-295.A. J. Wallace, R. D. Rusk, Moral Transformation: The Original Christian Paradigm of Salvation (New Zealand: Bridgehead, 2011), pp 249-271.Hastings Rashdall, The Idea of Atonement in Christian Theology (London: Macmillian, 1919), pp 190-292.Robert S. Franks, A history of the doctrine of the work of Christ in its ecclesiastical development vol. 1 (London: Hodder and Stoughton), p. 14: 'The above point of view of the Apostolic Fathers may be generally described as a Christian moralism.'.Michael Green, The Empty Cross of Jesus (Eastbourne: Kingsway, 2004; first published 1984), pp. 64-5: 'The simplest and most obvious understanding of the cross is to see it as the supreme example. ... This is a favourite theme in the early Fathers, as H.E.W. Turner showed in The Patristic Doctrine of Redemption. ... It can scarcely be denied that much of the second century understanding of the cross was frankly exemplarist.'J. F. Bethune-Baker, An introduction to the early history of Christian doctrine to the time of the Council of Chalcedon (London: Methuen & Co, 1903), pp. 351-2 : 'From this review of the teaching of the Church it will be seen that... in the earliest centuries... the main thought is that man is reconciled to God by the Atonement, not God to man. The change, that is, which it effects is a change in man rather than a change in God. It is God's unchangeable love for mankind that prompts the Atonement itself, is the cause of it, and ultimately determines the method by which it is effected.'For a recent defence of the moral transformation view, see A. J. Wallace, R. D. Rusk, Moral Transformation: The Original Christian Paradigm of Salvation (New Zealand: Bridgehead, 2011).Eusebius, Proof of the Gospel, 9.7.H. E. W. Turner, The Patristic Doctrine of Redemption: A Study of the Development of Doctrine During the First Five Centuries (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publish-ers, 2004), p. 54.A. J. Wallace, R. D. Rusk Moral Transformation: The Original Christian Paradigm of Salvation, (New Zealand: Bridgehead, 2011)David. A. Brondos, Paul on the Cross: Reconstructing the Apostle's Story of Redemption (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006)Stephen Finlan, Problems With Atonement: The Origins Of, And Controversy About, The Atonement Doctrine (Liturgical Press, 2005)Joel B. Green, Mark D. Baker, Recovering the Scandal of the Cross: Atonement in New Testament & Contemporary Contexts (IVP Academic, 2000)Pope John Paul II. General Audience 31 May 1995